DOCSLIB.ORG

An Eye on New York Architecture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OCULUS an eye on new york architecture The New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects Volume 51, Number 7, March 1989 ew Co lumbus Center proposal by David Childs FAIA of Skidmore Owings Merrill. 2 YC/AIA OC LUS OCULUS COMING CHAPTER EVENTS Volume 51, Number 7, March 1989 Oculus Tuesday, March 7. The Associates Tuesday, March 21 is Architects Lobby Acting Editor: Marian Page Committee is sponsoring a discussion on Day in Albany. The Chapter is providing Art Director: Abigail Sturges Typesetting: Steintype, Inc. Gordan Matta-Clark Trained as an bus service, which will leave the Urban Printer: The Nugent Organization architect, son of the surrealist Matta, Center at 7 am. To reserve a seat: Photographer: Stan Ri es Matta-Clark was at the center of the 838-9670. avant-garde at the end of the '60s and The New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects into the '70s. Art Historian Robert Tuesday, March 28. The Chapter is 457 Madison Avenue Pincus-Witten will be moderator of the co-sponsoring with the Italian Marble New York , New York 10022 evening. 6 pm. The Urban Center. Center a seminar on "Stone for Building 212-838-9670 838-9670. Exteriors: Designing, Specifying and Executive Committee 1988-89 Installing." 5:30-7:30 pm. The Urban Martin D. Raab FAIA, President Tuesday, March 14. The Art and Center. 838-9670. Denis G. Kuhn AIA, First Vice President Architecture and the Architects in David Castro-Blanco FAIA, Vice President Education Committees are co­ Tuesday, March 28. The Professional Douglas Korves AIA, Vice President Stephen P. King AIA, Secretary sponsoring a panel discussion on Affiliates Committee have organized a James L. Garretson AIA , Treasurer Educating Artists and Architects for Chapter-wide program on "Getting in Wendy Evans AIA, Director Collaboration with panelists Elisabeth Print in New York and How to Get More Harold Fredenburgh AIA, Director Egbert, artist; Melvin H. Pekarsky, Work from It." Those of you who rail Margaret Helfand AIA, Director Ronnette Ril ey AIA, Director artist/professor; and Tim Prentice FAIA, because some newspaper or magazine John Winkler AIA, Director architect/sculptor. Donald Cromley AIA, has (a) covered only the most seemingly Margot Wooll ey AIA, Director chairman of Pratt Institute's inconsequential part of your project, (b) undergraduate architecture department, mauled your building, or ( c) ignored Lenore M. Lucey AIA, Executive Director Cathanne Piesla, Executive Secretary will be moderator. 6:15 pm. The Urban your story idea, will take great interest in Center. this program. Panel members are six star Chapter Staff editors and reporters from the New York Regina Kelly Tuesday, March 21. The Religious media, whose beats vary from real estate Rosa Ri vera Judith Rowe Architecture Committee is presenting to preservation to lifestyle. They will tell Stephen Suggs the second lecture in its series on how they decide what makes a good "Sacred Architecture: Places for story for their readers, how they develop © 1989 The New York Chapter of Worship." Percival Goodman FAIA and their articles, and how they want facts the American Institute of Architects Edgar Tafel FAIA will present slides and delivered to them. Public relations All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole panels of their work and lecture on the specialists Joan Capelin and Renee or in part without wri tten permission is specific architectural attributes that give Sacks will moderate and discuss such strictly prohibited. some places of worship a certain sacred topics as how to use an article to get OCULUS , published ten times a year, quality. 6 pm. The Urban Center. For more business for your firm. Call Chapter September through June, is a benefit of reservations: 838-9670. The series will headquarters for details at 838-9670. NYC/ AIA membership, toward which $32 continue on April 18 and May 23. of membership dues are applied. New York Foundation fo r Architecture public member subscription rates: First Class Mail $45 Overseas First Class Air Mail $85, Overseas Surface Mail $45. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the Executive Committee or Staff of the NYC/ AIA. For more information on professional and public memberships please call the Chapter, at 212-838-9670. MARCH 1989 3 COLUMBUS CENTER PROJECT Testimony prepared by NYC/AJA Columbus Center Task Force for the City Planning Commission Hearing, City Hall, New York, 1February1989: Joseph Wasserman FAlA New Columbus Center proposal as i t Terrance R. Williams FAIA would appear in contex t with ex isting Lenore M. Lucey AIA buildings and Central Park. In 1985 The Metropolitan Transportation circulation; there was no study of a coalition of organizations filed suit. Authority and the Public Development whether in urban design terms a building Early in December of that year Salomon Corporation issued requests for of mandated maximum FAR on this Inc. dropped out of the project. Three proposals for the sale and development unusually large site was desirable. days later the State Trial Court barred of the Columbus Circle Coliseum site. the sale of the property because of the Proceeds were earmarked for mass Fourteen proposals were submitted on mandated zoning bonus provision. transit improvements. The RFP called May 1, 1985, and Boston Properties/ for both financial and design Salomon Inc. were designated as Boston Properties entered into a series components, but stated forthrightly on developers on July 11th of that year. of discrete negotiations with page one: "The sponsor intends to sell Their architect was The Office of Moshe representatives of the coalition to the site to the applicant whose proposal Safdie. Mr. Safdie's scheme was an determine if mutually acceptable most successfully meets the sponsor's exuberant asymmetrical arrangement criteria could be established which goals, particularly the goal of realizing of towers rising out of the mandated base would make it feasible to continue. As a the highest financial return from the defining Columbus Circle. result of these and other discussions, sale." 1982 revisions to midtown zoning Boston Properties decided to continue had raised the allowable floor ratio Unanimously approved the City with the project. They retained the (FAR) for the site to a base of 15, with Planning Commission in December 1986, services of David Childs, FAIA, of optional 20% bonuses, which could bring public organizations remained Skidmore Owings and Merrill (SOM) to the allowable maximum FAR to 18. The vociferously opposed. Although issues design a new building without the bonus, Columbus Circle RFP mandated that all such as bulk (the 20% mandated bonus), and more responsive to public criticism. competitors include the use of the 3 FAR height (925'), the resulting increase in bonus in their proposals. shadows on Central Park, and ill­ Description of Present Proposal considered site circulation were raised Totally absent was any consideration as as pertinent, any assessment of the NYC/ AlA commends Boston Properties to the kind of project which would opposition must include widespread for their good faith in realizing that the contribute most to the present and objections to the Safdie design. earlier proposal was floundering and future life of the city. The City Planning responding seriously to specific department played a minimal role Soon after the Board of Estimate criticism. The mandated bonus has been confined to pedestrian and subway approved the proposal in February 1987, removed, thereby reducing the project 4 NYC/AJA OCULUS -, ] I I ; I 'I ) u L, I --~--- - - -· .• ----"- r-.. · · -··• - • --...--..- r • ~ 6TH AVENUE :·u·.: ·-.·\.. ~~ '· ,· J\· : •: , ' I ~p..'< y,~Of'.O Ground floor plan of ----­ new Columbus Center project. FAR from 18 to 15; the reduction in bulk In an urban context a number of factors building wall around the Circle is has resulted in a concomitant reduction have contributed to the significance of extended as far as possible, fully in height, from 925' to 850'; and further, the redesign. Perhaps the single most enveloping the existing subway kiosk, to commercial square footage has been important change has been the fact that help define the presently amorphous, reduced while retail and residential massing and vocabulary have become unresolved space. square footages have been increased. distinctly New York. The complex The redesign retains 640 parking spaces, appears comfortably in context and in SOM has proposed the redesign of the considerably more than currently scale with the surrounding buildings. Circle so that it both functions as, and permitted. The building elements are suitably looks like, the major focus in the differentiated with distinct expression of Manhattan cityscape that it was always This redesign means that the base must base, middle, break points, shafts, and meant to be. We strongly recommend unite all components into what can be building crowns, all of which relate well that the City implement this major legally defined as a single building in to both newer buildings on 57th Street public proposal for traffic rationalization which no residential units can be and older buildings along Central Park and urban beautification. positioned below the highest level of West. The suggested materials are warm office space. These constraints act as in color and sympathetic with In the immediate environment of the major determinants in the design. neighboring buildings; there are no large building, traffic circulation itself has expanses of glass. been handled in a felicitous manner. All Evaluations of the Present Proposal truck loading bays are located within the The architects have taken full advantage building mass at the western edge of the The SOM proposal is sensitive to of the Large Scale Development site with a complete one-way circulation virtually all the urban design issues of provisions of the Zoning Resolution to loop entered from 58th Street and context, scale, and street wall enclosure; distribute bulk in a manner creating less exiting at 60th Street.
Recommended publications
  • 1960 National Gold Medal Exhibition of the Building Arts

    1960 National Gold Medal Exhibition of the Building Arts

    EtSm „ NA 2340 A7 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/nationalgoldOOarch The Architectural League of Yew York 1960 National Gold Medal Exhibition of the Building Arts ichievement in the Building Arts : sponsored by: The Architectural League of New York in collaboration with: The American Craftsmen's Council held at: The Museum of Contemporary Crafts 29 West 53rd Street, New York 19, N.Y. February 25 through May 15, i960 circulated by The American Federation of Arts September i960 through September 1962 © iy6o by The Architectural League of New York. Printed by Clarke & Way, Inc., in New York. The Architectural League of New York, a national organization, was founded in 1881 "to quicken and encourage the development of the art of architecture, the arts and crafts, and to unite in fellowship the practitioners of these arts and crafts, to the end that ever-improving leadership may be developed for the nation's service." Since then it has held sixtv notable National Gold Medal Exhibitions that have symbolized achievement in the building arts. The creative work of designers throughout the country has been shown and the high qual- ity of their work, together with the unique character of The League's membership, composed of architects, engineers, muralists, sculptors, landscape architects, interior designers, craftsmen and other practi- tioners of the building arts, have made these exhibitions events of outstanding importance. The League is privileged to collaborate on The i960 National Gold Medal Exhibition of The Building Arts with The American Crafts- men's Council, the only non-profit national organization working for the benefit of the handcrafts through exhibitions, conferences, pro- duction and marketing, education and research, publications and information services.
  • The Social and Political Thought of Paul Goodman

    The Social and Political Thought of Paul Goodman

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1980 The aesthetic community : the social and political thought of Paul Goodman. Willard Francis Petry University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Petry, Willard Francis, "The aesthetic community : the social and political thought of Paul Goodman." (1980). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2525. https://doi.org/10.7275/9zjp-s422 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DATE DUE UNIV. OF MASSACHUSETTS/AMHERST LIBRARY LD 3234 N268 1980 P4988 THE AESTHETIC COMMUNITY: THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL THOUGHT OF PAUL GOODMAN A Thesis Presented By WILLARD FRANCIS PETRY Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS February 1980 Political Science THE AESTHETIC COMMUNITY: THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL THOUGHT OF PAUL GOODMAN A Thesis Presented By WILLARD FRANCIS PETRY Approved as to style and content by: Dean Albertson, Member Glen Gordon, Department Head Political Science n Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.Org/details/ag:ptheticcommuni00petr . The repressed unused natures then tend to return as Images of the Golden Age, or Paradise, or as theories of the Happy Primitive. We can see how great poets, like Homer and Shakespeare, devoted themselves to glorifying the virtues of the previous era, as if it were their chief function to keep people from forgetting what it used to be to be a man.
  • The Flâneuse's Old Age

    The Flâneuse's Old Age

    Universiteit Gent Academiejaar 2005 Women’s Passages: A Bildungsroman of Female Flânerie Verhandeling voorgelegd aan de Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte Promotor: Prof. Dr. Bart Keunen voor het verkrijgen van de graad van licentiaat in de taal- en letterkunde: Germaanse Talen, door (Karen Van Godtsenhoven). Credits: The writing of a dissertation requires a lot more than just a computer and books: apart from the many material and practical necessities, there still are many personal and difficult-to- trace advices, inspiring conversations and cityscapes that have helped me writing this little volume. This list cannot be inclusive, but I can try to track down the most relevant people, in their most relevant environment (in the line of the following chapters…). First of all, I want to thank all the people of the University of Ghent, for their help and interest from the very beginning. My promotor, Prof. Bart Keunen, wins the first prize for valuable advice and endless patience with my writings and my person. Other professors and teachers like Claire Vandamme, Bart Eeckhout, Elke Gilson and Katrien De Moor were good mentors and gave me lots of reading material and titles. From my former universities, I want to thank Prof. Martine de Clercq (KUBrussel) who helped me putting things together in an inspiring way. Other thank you’s go to Prof. Kate McGowan (Critical and Cultural Theory) and Prof. Angela Michaelis (Culture of Decadence) from the Manchester Metropolitan University, who gave me a more academic basis for my interest in the subject of this dissertation. I want to thank Petra Broeders from Passaporta in Brussels for lending me books and providing me with coffee, Guido Fourrier from the Fashion Museum in Hasselt for his refreshing tour of the A la Garçonne exhibition, the people from Rosa in Brussels for explaining me several gender issues, and Belle and Carolien from DASQ (Ghent) for their “decadent” literature salons where I had the opportunity to listen and talk to Denise De Weerdt.
  • Jewish Dimensions in Modern Visual Culture: Antisemitism, Assimilation, Affirmation

    Jewish Dimensions in Modern Visual Culture: Antisemitism, Assimilation, Affirmation

    Fairfield University DigitalCommons@Fairfield History Faculty Book Gallery History Department 2009 Jewish Dimensions in Modern Visual Culture: Antisemitism, Assimilation, Affirmation Rose-Carol Washton Long Matthew Baigell Milly Heyd Gavriel D. Rosenfeld Fairfield University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/history-books Copyright 2009 Brandeis University Press Content archived her with permission from the copyright holder. Recommended Citation Washton Long, Rose-Carol; Baigell, Matthew; Heyd, Milly; and Rosenfeld, Gavriel D., "Jewish Dimensions in Modern Visual Culture: Antisemitism, Assimilation, Affirmation" (2009). History Faculty Book Gallery. 14. https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/history-books/14 This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 12 Gavriel D. Rosenfeld Postwar Jewish Architecture and the Memory of the Holocaust When Daniel Libeskind was named in early 2003 as the mas- ter planner in charge of redeveloping the former World Trade Center site in lower Manhattan, most observers saw it as a personal triumph that tes- tifi ed to his newfound status as one of the world’s most respected architects.
  • AMERICAN MEMORIAL to SIX MILLION JEWS of EUROPE,Me

    AMERICAN MEMORIAL to SIX MILLION JEWS of EUROPE,Me

    AMERICAN MEMORIAL TO SIX MILLION JEWS OF EUROPEme, . 165 WEST 46th STREET Suite 814 NEW YORK 19, N. Y. - Tel. PLaza 7-8430 Circle 6-2880 HONORARY SPONSORS COMMITTEE: BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADVISORY DESIGN COMMITTEE: Honorary Chairman Honorary Chairman CHARLES NAGEL, JR. HON. WILLIAM O'DWYER HON. HUGO E. ROGERS Director, Brooklyn Museum of Art and Sciences Mayor, The City of New York President, Borough of Manhattan Chairman GEOFFREY PARSONS HON. ROBERT MOSES, Member ex-officio I. ROGOSIN Editor, New York Herald Tribune Committee and Board Members: Secretary REV. DR. D. de SOLA POOL Rev. Carlyle Adams PROF. JAMES H. SHELDON FRANCIS HENRY TAYLOR Rabbi Isaac Alcalay Director, Metropolitan Museum of Art Congressman Walter G. Andrews Administrative Chairman Murray Antkies A. R. LERNER Joseph R. Apfel Hon. Thurman Arnold Sholem Asch Rev. Henry A. Atkinson Hon. Joseph C. Baldwin Prof. Salo W. Baron Hon. John J. Bennett B. Bialostotsky February 2, 1950 Justice Hugo L. Black Joseph G. Blum Gay H. Brown Hon. James A. Burke Congressman William T. Byrne Rudolph Callman The Rev. Dr. D. de Sola i^ool Eddie Cantor Hon. John Cashmore 99 Central Park West Congressman Emanuel Celler Prof. Emanuel Chapman New York 23, N. Harry Woodburn Chase Alexander P. Chopin Stuart Constable Hon. Edward Corsi My dear Dr. de Sola Pool: Myer Dorfman Justice William O. Douglas Congressman Edward J. Elsaesser Mrs. Moses P. Epstein In reply to your letter of January 31st, I wi3h Rev. Frederick L. Fagley Hon. James A. Farley to inform you that Mr. Joseph Ho veil was never asked to Abraham Feinberg Rabbi Abraham J.
  • BRYANT PARK in Celebration of Gabriel Kreuther's Second

    BRYANT PARK in Celebration of Gabriel Kreuther's Second

    christian boone BRYANT PARK In celebration of Gabriel Kreuther’s second anniversary and the 25th anniversary of Bryant Park as we know it today, we are delighted to present to you a cocktail menu that will allow you to travel through the history of our community and discover the secrets of the park and the New York public. Potter’s Field Illegal Mezcal • Lillet Blanc • St-Germain • Black Cardamom • Lemon ~ One of the first known uses for Bryant Park was as a potter’s field in 1823; its purpose was a graveyard for society’s solitary and indigent. It remained so until 1840, when the city decommissioned it and thousands of bodies were moved to Wards Island in prepara- tion for the construction of the Croton Reservoir. The Reservoir Ketel One Vodka • Red Pepper • Oregano • Lemon • Absinthe ~ The Croton Distributing Reservoir was surrounded by 50-foot high, thick granite walls and supplied the city with drinking water during the 19th century. Along the tops of the walls were public promenades where Edgar Allan Poe enjoyed his walks. A remnant of the reservoir can still be seen today in the New York Public Library. Washington’s Troop Michter’s Rye • Massenez Crème de Pêche • Apricot • Lemon • Rosemary ~ General George Washington solemnly crossed the park with his troops after suffering a defeat at the battle of Brooklyn in 1776, the first major battle of the war to take place after America declared independence on July 4th, 1776. After the battle, the British held CHAPTER I New York City for the remainder of the Revolutionary War.
  • Banning Cars from Manhattan

    Banning Cars from Manhattan

    Paul and Percival Goodman Banning Cars from Manhattan 1961 The Anarchist Library Contents Peripheral Parking.......................... 4 Roads.................................. 4 Means, etc................................ 6 Conclusion............................... 6 2 We propose banning private cars from Manhattan Island. Permitted mo- tor vehicles would be buses, small taxis, vehicles for essential services (doctor, police, sanitation, vans, etc.), and the trucking used in light industry. Present congestion and parking are unworkable, and other proposed solu- tions are uneconomic, disruptive, unhealthy, nonurban, or impractical. It is hardly necessary to prove that the actual situation is intolerable. “Motor trucks average less than six miles per hour in traffic, as against eleven miles per hour for horse drawn vehicles in 1911.” “During the ban on nonessential vehicles during the heavy snowstorm of February 1961, air pollution dropped 66 per cent.” (New York Times, March 13, 1961.) The street widths of Manhattan were designed, in 1811, for buildings of one to four stories. By banning private cars and reducing traffic, we can, in most areas, close off nearly nine out of ten cross-town streets and every second north-south avenue. These closed roads plus the space now used for off-street parking will give us a handsome fund of land for neighborhood relocation. At present over 35 percent of the area of Manhattan is occupied by roads. Instead of the present grid, we can aim at various kinds of enclosed neighborhoods, in approximately 1200-foot to 1600-foot superblocks. It would be convenient, however, to leave the existing street pattern in the main midtown shopping and business areas, in the financial district, and wherever the access for trucks and service cars is imperative.
  • A Structural Analysis of Constantin Brancusi's

    A Structural Analysis of Constantin Brancusi's

    A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF CONSTANTIN BRANCUSI'S STONE SCULPTURE by LESLIE ALLAN DAWN B.A., M.A., University of Victoria A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Art History We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard © LESLIE ALLAN DAWN UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA October 1982 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part3 by mimeograph or other means3 without the permission of the author. In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Ws>TQg.»? CF E)g.T The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date (3/81) i i ABSTRACT It has long been recognized by Sidney Geist and others that Constantin Brancusi's stone work, after 1907, forms a coherent totality in which each component depends on its relationship to the whole for its significance; in short, the oeuvre comprises a rigorous sculptural language. Up to the present, however, formalist approaches have proven insufficient for decodifying the clear design which can be intuited in the language.
  • The Museum of Modern Art for RELEASE: Thursday, October I7, I968 11 West 53 Street, New York, N.Y

    The Museum of Modern Art for RELEASE: Thursday, October I7, I968 11 West 53 Street, New York, N.Y

    ^^. The Museum of Modern Art FOR RELEASE: Thursday, October I7, I968 11 West 53 Street, New York, N.Y. 10019 Tel. 245-3200 Cable: Modernart PRESS PREVIEW: Wednesday, October I6, I968 2-6 P.M. A six-foot scale model of Louis Kahn^s Monument to the Six Million Jewish Martyrs will have its first public showing at The Museum of Modern Art from October I7 through November I5. Commissioned by the Committee to Commemorate the Six Million Jewish Martyrs representing nearly 50 national and local Jewish organizations, the monument was designed for a site in Battery Park, alongside the Promenade near the Emma Lazarus Tablet and overlooking the Statue of Liberty. It has been approved in principle by the Parks Department and by the City Art Commission, and it is hoped that work can be completed by 1970. Arthur Drexler, Director of the Museum*s Department of Architecture and Design, says that the monument offers a physical embodiment of hope as well as despair. It consists of seven glass piers each 10* square and 11* high placed on a 66^ square granite pedestal. The center pier has been given the character of a small chapel into which people may enter. The walls of the chapel will be inscribed. The six piers around the center, all of equal dimensions^ are blank. "The one - the chapel - speaks; the other six are silent," the architect says. The piers are constructed of solid blocks of glass that interlock without the use of mortar, "Changes of light, the seasons of the year, the play of the weather, and the drama of movement on the river will transmit their life to the monument," Mr.
  • June 2020 Landmarks Minutes

    June 2020 Landmarks Minutes

    Alida Camp 505 Park Avenue, Suite 620 Chair New York, NY 10022 (212) 758-4340 Will Brightbill (212) 758-4616 (Fax) District Manager [email protected] – E-Mail www.cb8m.com – Website The City of New York Community Board 8 Manhattan Landmarks Committee Monday, May 18, 2020 – 6:30PM Please note: The resolutions contained in the committee minutes are recommendations submitted by the committee chair to the Community Board. At the monthly full board meeting, the resolutions are discussed and voted upon by all members of Community Board 8 Manhattan. PLEASE NOTE: When evaluating Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness, the Landmarks Committee of Community Board 8M ONLY considers the appropriateness of the proposal to the architecture of the building and, in the case of a building within an Historic District, the appropriateness of the proposal to the character of that Historic District. All testimony should be related to such appropriateness. The Committee recommends a Resolution to the full Community Board, which votes on a Resolution to be sent to the Landmarks Preservation Commission. These Resolutions are advisory; the decision of the Landmarks Preservation Commission is binding. Applicants and members of the public who are interested in the issues addressed are invited, but not required, to attend the Full Board meeting on Wednesday, June 17, 2020 via Zoom at 6:30PM. They may testify for up to three minutes in the Public Session, which they must sign up for no later than 6:45PM. Members of the Board will discuss the items in executive session; if a member of the public wishes a comment made or a question asked at this time, he or she must ask a Board Member to do it.
  • Polishing the Jewel

    Polishing the Jewel

    Polishing the Jewel An Administra ti ve History of Grand Canyon Na tional Pa rk by Michael F.Anderson GRA N D CA N YO N A S S OC I ATI O N Grand Canyon Association P.O. Box 399 Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 www.grandcanyon.org Grand Canyon Association is a non-profit organization. All proceeds from the sale of this book will be used to support the educational goals of Grand Canyon National Park. Copyright © 2000 by Grand Canyon Association. All rights reserved. Monograph Number 11 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Anderson, Michael F. Polishing the jewel : an adminstrative history of Grand Canyon National Park/by Michael F.Anderson p. cm. -- (Monograph / Grand Canyon Association ; no. 11) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-938216-72-4 1. Grand Canyon National Park (Ariz.)--Management—History. 2.Grand Canyon National Park (Ariz.)--History. 3. United States. National Park Service—History. I. Title. II. Monograph (Grand Canyon Association) ; no. 11. F788 .A524 2000 333.78’3’0979132--dc21 00-009110 Edited by L. Greer Price and Faith Marcovecchio Designed by Kim Buchheit, Dena Dierker and Ron Short Cover designed by Ron Short Printed in the United States of America on recycled paper. Front cover: Tour cars bumper-to-bumper from the Fred Harvey Garage to the El Tovar Hotel, ca.1923. Traffic congestion has steadily worsened at Grand Canyon Village since the automobile became park visitors’ vehicle of choice in the mid-1920s.GRCA 3552; Fred Harvey Company photo. Inset front cover photo: Ranger Perry Brown collects a one dollar “automobile permit” fee at the South Rim,1931.GRCA 30.
  • Robert Fishman Curriculum Vitae Page 1 Professor of Architecture and Urban Planning the Taubman College of Architecture and Urba

    Robert Fishman Curriculum Vitae Page 1 Professor of Architecture and Urban Planning the Taubman College of Architecture and Urba

    Robert Fishman Curriculum vitae Page 1 Professor of Architecture and Urban Planning The Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning The University of Michigan 2000 Bonisteel Boulevard Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2069; 734 764-6885; fax: 734 763-2322; [email protected] . Education: Ph.D. Harvard University, 1974. History. A.M. Harvard University, 1969. History. A.B. Stanford University, 1968. History. Employment: Professor of Architecture and Urban Planning, The Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2000- Emil Lorch Professor, 2006-2009. Professor of History, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Rutgers University, Camden. 1988-2000; (Associate Professor with tenure, 1978-88; Assistant Professor, 1974-78). Adjunct Visiting Professor, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Hunter College, City University of New York, Fall 1998. Adjunct Visiting Professor of History and Urban Studies, University of Pennsylvania, 1990-92. Visiting Associate Professor, Urban Studies, Barnard College, Columbia University, Fall 1984. Honors Laurence Gerckens Prize for Lifetime Achievement in Scholarship and Teaching, 2009. Society for American City and Regional Planning History. Shared with Eugenie Birch, U. of Pennsylvania. Distinguished Visiting Scholar, Cornell University College of Architecture and Planning, 2007. Associate Editor, Journal of the American Planning Association, 2005-2008. Member, Editorial Board, 2008- President, The Urban History Association, 2003. The Urban Studies Lectureship, The University of Pennsylvania, 2002. Robert Fishman Curriculum vitae Page 2 The Lansdowne Lectureship, The University of Victoria, British Columbia, 2002. Board, The Society for City and Regional Planning History, 1999-2003. Public Policy Scholar, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 1999. Cass Gilbert Visiting Professor, School of Architecture, University of Minnesota, March, 1998.