DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Quality Monitoring: Facilitating Environmental Stewardship

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Quality Monitoring: Facilitating Environmental Stewardship 1 Smith Creek E. Coli Testing Meadow Brook Upper Petitcodiac River Water Quality Monitoring: Facilitating Environmental Stewardship Date: March 31st, 2021 Prepared by: Brittany Cormier (Project Leader) and Nattayada Thongboonmee (Project Technician) Project #: 200187 2 This page was intentionally left blank. 3 DISCLAIMER The Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance (PWA) is a non-profit environmental charity that works to improve and maintain the ecological systems within the Petitcodiac River Watershed. We use local science to educate community members within the watershed about the ecology within the Petitcodiac River’s watershed boundary, and the importance of protecting this unique river system. Laboratorial Disclaimer The PWA has been working on monitoring water quality within the Petitcodiac Watershed with the help of government organisations and volunteers since 1997, and we have been collecting our own monthly water quality data since 1999. The PWA has our own in-house, non-accredited water microbiology lab (PWAML) where we can conduct bacterial and nutrient testing. Although the PWAML is not fully accredited (due to financial constraints), we work to ensure our testing has the same scientific merit as at a fully accredited lab: we follow all necessary protocols, standard operating procedures, training and quality management systems as per ISO 17025 certification standards. Our Laboratory Quality Management System (LQMS) can be made available upon request. Photographic Credits Unless otherwise indicated, photographs, charts, and maps in this publication are courtesy of the Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance. All other photograph or map credits appear following the image caption. General Disclaimer While every effort has been made to present accurate maps and data, the Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance does not guarantee that the maps and data are correct. Users of facts presented in this report, as well as the data herein must take care to ensure that applications envisaged for these data are appropriate uses. The opinions expressed in this document are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the other employees and board members of the organisation, or of the Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance. The Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance 236 St. George St., Suite 405 Moncton, N.B., E1C 1W1 (506) 384-3369 4 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 9 Résumé Général ........................................................................................................................... 10 Remerciements ............................................................................................................................. 12 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Context .......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Watershed Geography .................................................................................................................. 14 1.3 Watershed Geology and Geomorphology .................................................................................... 15 1.3.1 Sub-watersheds of the Petitcodiac ............................................................................. 17 1.3.1.1 The Upper Petitcodiac River System .................................................................. 18 1.3.1.1.1 Pollett River ................................................................................................... 18 1.3.1.1.2 Little River ...................................................................................................... 19 1.3.1.1.3 North River ..................................................................................................... 20 1.3.1.1.4 Anagance River .............................................................................................. 21 1.3.1.2 The Lower Petitcodiac River System .................................................................. 21 1.3.1.2.1 Hall’s Creek ................................................................................................... 22 1.3.1.2.2 Mill Creek ....................................................................................................... 24 1.3.1.2.3 Jonathan Creek .............................................................................................. 26 1.3.1.2.4 Humphrey’s Brook ......................................................................................... 28 1.3.1.2.5 Rabbit Brook .................................................................................................. 29 1.3.1.2.6 Fox Creek ....................................................................................................... 30 1.3.1.2.7 Michael’s Brook ............................................................................................. 31 1.3.1.3 The Memramcook River System .......................................................................... 32 1.3.1.3.1 Breau Creek ................................................................................................... 33 1.3.1.3.2 Meadow Brook ............................................................................................... 34 1.3.1.3.3 Stony Creek .................................................................................................... 35 1.3.1.3.4 Smith Creek .................................................................................................... 35 1.3.1.3.5 South Branch of the Memramcook River ....................................................... 36 1.3.1.3.6 Upper Branch of the Memramcook River ...................................................... 37 1.3.1.3.7 Lower Memramcook River ............................................................................. 38 1.4 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING SITES ..................................................................................... 39 1.5 WETLAND ASSESSMENT SITES ............................................................................................ 43 1.5.1 Smith Brook ............................................................................................................... 43 1.5.2 Memramcook Lake .................................................................................................... 44 1.5.3 Folly Lake .................................................................................................................. 44 1.5.4 College Bridge Causeway ......................................................................................... 45 1.6 PARAMETERS & HISTORICAL TRENDS IN PARAMETER VALUES .............................. 45 1.6.1 Water Temperature .................................................................................................... 45 1.6.1.1 Historical Trends in Water Temperature in the Petitcodiac Watershed ............ 46 1.6.2 Dissolved Oxygen ...................................................................................................... 46 1.6.2.1 Historical Trends in Dissolved Oxygen in the Memramcook River Watershed . 47 5 1.6.3 pH .............................................................................................................................. 47 1.6.4 Specific Conductivity ................................................................................................. 48 1.6.5 Salinity ....................................................................................................................... 48 1.6.6 Total Dissolved Solids ............................................................................................... 49 1.6.7 Turbidity .................................................................................................................... 49 1.6.8 Nitrates ...................................................................................................................... 50 1.6.9 Phosphates ................................................................................................................. 51 1.6.10 Total Coliforms ...................................................................................................... 51 1.6.11 Escherichia coli ...................................................................................................... 52 1.6.11.1 Historical Trends in E. coli levels in the Memramcook Watershed ................... 52 1.6.12 Guidelines for Assessing Water Quality Parameter Data ..................................... 53 2 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 54 2.1 FIELD SAMPLING ..................................................................................................................... 54 2.1.1 Field Observations .................................................................................................... 55 2.1.2 Field Sampling: Physical Parameters ....................................................................... 55 2.1.3 Field Sampling: Bacteria and Nutrients .................................................................... 56 2.1.4 Field Sampling: Temperature Logger ......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EIA Final Report (PDF)
    YB299A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE PETITCODIAC RIVER CAUSEWAY Submitted to: New Brunswick Department of Supply and Services Fredericton, New Brunswick Submitted by: AMEC Earth & Environmental, A Division of AMEC Americas Limited Fredericton, New Brunswick September 30, 2005 TE23520.4 NB Department of Supply and Services EIA Report Modifications to the Petitcodiac River Causeway September 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background This document is the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report for the Modifications to the Petitcodiac River Causeway Project. The Petitcodiac River causeway (“causeway”) is a gated dam structure with an installed vertical slot fishway that was built across the Petitcodiac River between the City of Moncton and the Town of Riverview. Figure 1 shows the location of the Petitcodiac River and Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the causeway. Completed in 1968, the causeway was intended to create a second transportation link between the two communities, offer flood protection for farmland between the causeway and the head of tide at Salisbury, and create a freshwater headpond with potential for recreation and as an industrial water source. A bridge would have achieved the transportation objective, but not the other benefits. As early as 1961, it was recognized by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (“DFO”) that fish passage would be an issue if a causeway was built across the Petitcodiac River. Consequently, DFO required that a fishway be included in the structure. However, the construction of the causeway with the fishway resulted in fish passage issues from the outset. The fishway proved ineffective for all fish species that require passage for life cycle purposes, including the Inner Bay of Fundy Atlantic salmon that is now also protected under the Species at Risk Act because of declining numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • MCP No 02-E.Cdr
    Silica Natural Resources Lands, Minerals and Petroleum Division Mineral Commodity Profile No. 2 ilicon (Si) is the second most common element on Earth after World Production and Reserves Soxygen. Si does not occur naturally in its pure state but instead is found chiefly in mineral form as either silica (SiO2) or silicates. Silica Silica deposits occur, and are mined, in most and/or silicate minerals are a constituent of nearly every rock type in countries. Global silica output is estimated at Earth's crust. roughly 120 Mt to 150 Mt per year (Dumont 2006). The most familiar silica mineral is quartz. In commodity terms, silica About 5.9 Mt of ferrosilicon were produced also refers to geological deposits enriched in quartz and/or other silica worldwide in 2006. The major contributors were minerals. Silica resources include 1) poorly consolidated quartzose China, Russia, United States, Brazil and South sand and gravel, 2) quartz sand/pebbles in consolidated rock (e.g. Africa (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] 2006). quartzose sandstone), 3) quartzite , and 4) quartz veins. Global production of silicon metal reportedly Uses approached 1.2 Mt in 2006, almost half of which came from China (USGS 2006). Other important Silica is hard, chemically inert, has a high melting point, and functions producers are the United States, Brazil, Norway, as a semiconductor—characteristics that give it many industrial France, Russia, South Africa and Australia. applications. Silica deposits generally must be processed to remove iron, clay and other impurities. The most valuable resources contain Silica Consumption in Canada (Total = 2.57 Mt) >98% SiO2 and can be readily crushed into different sizes for the various end products.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the PDF File
    The Dispossession of the Míkmaq Indians from Chignecto to Elsipogtog1: A Case Study Analysis of the Health Determinants of the Physical Environment by Patrick J. Augustine A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Indigenous and Canadian Studies Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2021, Patrick J. Augustine 1 The community uses the Pacifique orthography, while the Francis-Smith system spells it L’sipuktuk (Sable & Francis, 2012). Abstract Traditionally, the Míkmaq enjoyed an interconnected relationship with the land, harvesting what they needed from the earth and the ocean, guided by the concept of Netukulimk, the practice of sustainability. Upon the arrival of European settlers, new trade practices were introduced, and what was once plentiful was quickly depleted. Although the original inhabitants were assured that their lands would be protected by agreements and treaties, these assurances proved to be false, and the traditional relationship with the land was threatened, as the Míkmaq—presaging the fate of most Indigenous Peoples in Canada—were dispossessed of their historical lands and forced to live on reserves; many of them far away from the environments to which they had had biological and spiritual ties. Land is central to our understanding of current Indigenous health issues; centering around how the Míkmaq traditionally employed land and resources, what changes in that relationship were brought about by colonization, and how their removal to reserves influenced their relationship vis-à-vis their environment. In addressing the ways that land policies, post-first contact, were developed and implemented over time, it is possible and necessary to juxtapose that history with the story of the forced mobilization of the Míkmaq and examine the effects that the dispossession of land had upon their livelihood and economic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2748 English
    -B N 37 ’ M RUNSWICK OUVEAU DU ARCHÉOLOGIE L SUR ANUSCRITS H K RISTMANSON ELEN A SHORT HISTORY OF BEAUMONT, NEW BRUNSWICK : PAR BY: -B N B B RUNSWICK OUVEAU AU EAUMONT E ITRQEDE HISTORIQUE REF HELEN KRISTMANSON NEW BRUNSWICK MANUSCRIPTS IN ARCHAEOLOGY 37 A Short History of Beaumont, New Brunswick NEW BRUNSWICK MANUSCRIPTS IN ARCHAEOLOGY 37 By Helen Kristmanson Culture and Sport Secretariat 2 New Brunswick Manuscripts in Archaeology 37 A Short History of Beaumont, New Brunswick 3 This series is designed to facilitate the distribution of manuscripts relating to New Brunswick archaeology. They will be published in small quantities and will generally be available by special request only. © Helen Kristmanson and the Province of New Brunswick New Brunswick Manuscripts in Archaeology 37, 2004. Published and edited by: Archaeological Services, Heritage Branch Culture and Sport Secretariat P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, N.B. E3B 5H1, Canada ISBN 1-55396-559-0 Printed in Canada CNB 2748 2 New Brunswick Manuscripts in Archaeology 37 A Short History of Beaumont, New Brunswick 3 Table of Contents List of Figures. 4 Abstract. 5 Acknowledgements . 5 Introduction . 7 The Mi’kmaq. 7 The Chapel . 9 Related Sites: A Network of Mi’kmaq Communities . 10 Beaumont: Part of a Larger Community . 11 Fort Folly Point . 11 Industry . 13 Boudreau Quarry . 14 Beaumont Quarry . 15 Beaumont Brickyard . 16 Conclusions . 16 References . 17 4 New Brunswick Manuscripts in Archaeology 37 A Short History of Beaumont, New Brunswick 5 List of Figures 1. General location map . 6 2. St. Anne’s Chapel Exterior . 9 3. St. Anne’s Chapel Interior .
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Provinces Fishery Regulations Règlement De Pêche Des Provinces Maritimes TABLE of PROVISIONS TABLE ANALYTIQUE
    CANADA CONSOLIDATION CODIFICATION Maritime Provinces Fishery Règlement de pêche des Regulations provinces maritimes SOR/93-55 DORS/93-55 Current to September 11, 2021 À jour au 11 septembre 2021 Last amended on May 14, 2021 Dernière modification le 14 mai 2021 Published by the Minister of Justice at the following address: Publié par le ministre de la Justice à l’adresse suivante : http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca OFFICIAL STATUS CARACTÈRE OFFICIEL OF CONSOLIDATIONS DES CODIFICATIONS Subsections 31(1) and (3) of the Legislation Revision and Les paragraphes 31(1) et (3) de la Loi sur la révision et la Consolidation Act, in force on June 1, 2009, provide as codification des textes législatifs, en vigueur le 1er juin follows: 2009, prévoient ce qui suit : Published consolidation is evidence Codifications comme élément de preuve 31 (1) Every copy of a consolidated statute or consolidated 31 (1) Tout exemplaire d'une loi codifiée ou d'un règlement regulation published by the Minister under this Act in either codifié, publié par le ministre en vertu de la présente loi sur print or electronic form is evidence of that statute or regula- support papier ou sur support électronique, fait foi de cette tion and of its contents and every copy purporting to be pub- loi ou de ce règlement et de son contenu. Tout exemplaire lished by the Minister is deemed to be so published, unless donné comme publié par le ministre est réputé avoir été ainsi the contrary is shown. publié, sauf preuve contraire. ... [...] Inconsistencies in
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Beauséjour National Park Museum CATALOGUE of EXHIBITS
    CATALOGUE OF EXHIBITS IN THE Fort Beauséjour National Park Museum CATALOGUE OF EXHIBITS IN THE Fort Beauséjour National Park Museum PREPARED BY J. C. WEBSTER, C.M.G., M.D., D.Sc. LL.D., F.R.S.C. Member of the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada HONORARY CURATOR DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND RESOURCES HON. T. A. CRERAR. Minister CHARLES CAMSELL, Deputy Minister LANDS, PARKS AND FORESTS BRANCH R. A. GIBSON, Director NATIONAL PARKS BUREAU F. H. H. WILLIAMSON, Controller OTTAWA, CANADA 43910—U FORT BEAUSËJOUR NATIONAL PARK NEW BRUNSWICK Introduction HE site of old Fort Beauséjour, located on the long ridge between the Aulac and Missaguash rivers, and over­ Tlooking Chignecto Bay, forms one of the most interest­ ing historical places in New Brunswick. The fort was originally constructed by the French between 1751 and 1755 on the orders of de la Jonquière, Governor of Canada, as a counter defence against the English Fort Lawrence, which stood on a parallel ridge about a mile and half to the south­ east. It derived its name from an early settler, Laurent Chatillon, surnamed Beauséjour, after whom the southern end of the ridge had been named Pointe-à-Beauséjour. In 1755, before its actual completion, Fort Beauséjour was attacked by an expedition from Boston under the com­ mand of Colonel the Honourable Robert Monckton. Landing at the mouth of the Missaguash river, the English force, which numbered about 2,000 New Englanders, encamped at Fort Lawrence before marching on the fort, being joined there by 300 British regulars. Following the capture of an outpost at Pont à Buot, heavy guns and mortars were landed from the boats, gun-emplacements were dug over 800 yards north of the fort, and a heavy fire was opened on the fortifi­ cations by the batteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix to "The Acadian Refugee Camp on the Miramichi, 1756-1761"
    List of Refugee Acadian Households at Camp Espérance on the Miramichi, 1756-1757 Appendix to "The Acadian Refugee Camp on the Miramichi, 1756-1761" by Ronnie-Gilles LeBlanc English translation & glossary of place names by John Estano DeRoche See a glossary of PLACE NAMES after the lists of households Columns in the Lists of Households 1. Surname of husband or male individual. (In the rare cases of a single woman alone, her names are in cols. 1 & 2.) Also, “dit” indicates a nickname. 2. His given name, with his code number in Stephen A. White’s Dictionnaire généalogique des familles acadiennes (DGFA); & in parentheses, his father, ditto. 3. Surname of wife. (In the rare cases of a single woman alone, her subsequent husband might be named here.) 4. Her given name; and in parentheses, her father’s given name & his code # in White’s DGFA. (Note: “Isabelle” and “Élisabeth” were interchangeable.) 5. Date and place of marriage if known. The letter “c” (for “circa”) indicates an estimate of the year. Many place names had multiple spellings, in both English & French. Some of those are provided in the glossary of “Places”, below. In all cases, mention of a 2nd or 3rd marriage refers to the man; instances of a woman’s remarriage are not entered in this table 6. Place of origin of the household (or of the man), before displacement. 7. Number of persons in the household in the 1754/55 census of Beaubassin & of the Memramcook, Petitcodiac, & Shepody River communities. A zero means the household was not counted in that census.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Studies Grade 3 Provincial Identity
    Social Studies Grade 3 Curriculum - Provincial ldentity Implementation September 2011 New~Nouveauk Brunsw1c Acknowledgements The Departments of Education acknowledge the work of the social studies consultants and other educators who served on the regional social studies committee. New Brunswick Newfoundland and Labrador Barbara Hillman Darryl Fillier John Hildebrand Nova Scotia Prince Edward Island Mary Fedorchuk Bethany Doiron Bruce Fisher Laura Ann Noye Rick McDonald Jennifer Burke The Departments of Education also acknowledge the contribution of all the educators who served on provincial writing teams and curriculum committees, and who reviewed and/or piloted the curriculum. Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Program Designs and Outcomes ..................................................................................................................... 3 Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Essential Graduation Learnings .................................................................................................................... 4 General Curriculum Outcomes ..................................................................................................................... 6 Processes ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 3 Social Studies That Have Been Organized According and Perspectives to the Six Conceptual Strands and the Three Processes
    2012 Prince Edward Island Department of Education and Early Childhood Development 250 Water Street, Suite 101 Summerside, Prince Edward Island Canada, C1N 1B6 Tel: (902) 438-4130 Fax: (902) 438-4062 www.gov.pe.ca/eecd/ CONTENTS Acknowledgments The Prince Edward Island Department of Education and Early Childhood Development acknowledges the work of the social studies consultants and other educators who served on the regional social studies committee. New Brunswick Newfoundland and Labrador John Hildebrand Darryl Fillier Barbara Hillman Nova Scotia Prince Edward Island Mary Fedorchuk Bethany Doiron Bruce Fisher Laura Ann Noye Rick McDonald Jennifer Burke The Prince Edward Island Department of Education and Early Childhood Development also acknowledges the contribution of all the educators who served on provincial writing teams and curriculum committees, and who reviewed or piloted the curriculum. The Prince Edward Island Department of Education and Early Childhood Development recognizes the contribution made by Tammy MacDonald, Consultation/Negotiation Coordinator/Research Director of the Mi’kmaq Confederacy of Prince Edward Island, for her contribution to the development of this curriculum. ATLANTIC CANADA SOCIAL STUDIES CURRICULUM GUIDE: GRADE 3 i CONTENTS ii ATLANTIC CANADA SOCIAL STUDIES CURRICULUM GUIDE: GRADE 3 CONTENTS Contents Introduction Background ..................................................................................1 Aims of Social Studies ..................................................................1 Purpose
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Petitcodiac River Causeway and Fish Passage Issues
    Review of the Petitcodiac River Causeway And Fish Passage Issues Prepared For: Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada Prepared By: Eugene Niles Special Advisor to The Minister of Fisheries and Oceans P.O. Box 1262 Cap-Pelé, NB Tel: (506) 577-6002 Fax: (506) 577-6708 TD Date: February 9, 2001 195 R63 N55 2001 & ET TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .............................................. ............................................. 1 BACKGROUND ............................................ ................................................. 1 PART ONE FINDINGS FROM STUDIES AND REPORTS .. .. ... .. ................................................. 3 The Consultation Process............................ .... .................. ......... .. ........... .............. 10 Issues and Concerns Raised By Stakeholders .. ....................................................... 12 Consultation with Interested Citizens........... .. .. .. .................................................... 19 Consultation with Scientists, Experts and other Consultants ............................................. 19 PART TWO POSSIBLE OPTIONS .................................. .... ... .... ..... .. ................................................... 20 Discussion and Analysis .................................................................................................... 21 Option 1. Status Quo ..................... ...... .................................................................. 21 Option 2. Replacing the Fishway .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tracer Analysis of Sediment Redistribution of Tamar AMC Search and Estuary for Launceston Flood Authority ETS Worldwide Ltd
    Thesis: Strategies for Sustainable Morphological Remediation of the Tamar River Estuary and other Similarly Degraded Estuaries by Ian M Kidd, BSc, Grad. Dip. of Computing Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania October 2016 Table of Contents Abstract ………………………………………………………………………….…...I General Declarations………….……………………….………………………..……II Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….III List of Figures……………………………………………………………………….IV List of Tables……………………………….……………………………………..…V List of symbols and abbreviations used in the thesis……………….………………VI Chapter One: Introduction 1. Research Question………………………………………………………….……1 1.1 Background………………………………………………………………1 2. Literature review………………………………………………………………...1 2.1 Definition and classification of estuaries……………………………...1 2.2 Water circulation…………………….………………………………... 2 2.2.1 Classification of estuaries by circulation mode………………..3 2.3 Tides, tidal constituents and harmonics……………………………….3 2.3.1Tidal constituent analysis……………………………………...4 2.4 Sediment dynamics……………………………………………..………..4 2.4.1 Turbidity maximum, flocculation……….……………………..4 2.4.2 Tidal asymmetry……………………………….………………4 2.4.3 Sediment transport……………………………….……………5 2.4.4 Tidal asymmetry ratio…………………………………………7 2.4.5 Net sediment flux…………………….………………………..7 2.4.6 Sediment supply……………..……..……………………….....9 2.4.7 Sediment management………………...………………………9 Dredging……………………………..…………………………9 Silt raking………………..……………………………………10 Catchment management……………….……………….…..…10
    [Show full text]
  • Em-Coates The-Petitcodiac-River.Pdf
    Em Coates February 16, 2017 The Petitcodiac River The Petitcodiac river, often nicknamed by the locals as the chocolate river due to its heavy sedimentation, is located in South Eastern, New Brunswick. It is a popular belief that the name derives from the French term “petit coude” meaning “little elbow”. The real etymology of the word comes from an indigenous word. According to Maliseet Elder and linguist Dr. Peter Paul of the Woodstock Reserve, the name refers to a wall of water rushing in and means “sound of thunder”. The name could also derive from the Mi’kmaq word Epetkutogoyek which means “the river that bends like a bow”. This is a reference to the right-angle bend near Moncton. Acadians transformed the spelling to Petcoudiac or Petitcoudiac which was modified to Petitcodiac by British settlers. Ten named tributaries join the river in its course toward its mouth in Shepody Bay. Its tributaries to the left are North River, Mill Creek, Jonathan Creek, Halls Creek, and Fox Creek. Its tributaries on the right are Anagance River, Little River, Pollett River, Turtle Creek, and Weldon Creek. The Memramcook River joins the Petitcodiac River near its mouth. The Petitcodiac then drains into Shepody Bay. Once the bay passes Hopewell Rocks, it merges with the Cumberland Basin, which flows South-West towards Chignecto Bay. Chignecto Bay drains into the Bay of Fundy, which flows into the Gulf of Maine, which continues South-East into the Atlantic Ocean via the Northeast Channel. The river has a meander length of 79 kilometers. It runs through Westmorland, Albert, and Kings counties.
    [Show full text]