DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplementary Tables Table S1 Specificities and Efficiency Scores Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplementary Tables Table S1 Specificities and Efficiency Scores Of Supplementary Tables Table S1 Specificities and efficiency scores of sgRNAs targeting the reference gene and the CNS-specific promoters sgRNA Sequence 5‘to 3‘ PAMa Positionb MIT Guide CRISPspec Doench Potential Off -Targets Specificity Score Efficiency For Number of Mismatches Score Score (%) 0 1 2 3 RG1 GCGTTACTTC AGG -258 to -239 82 7.394 86 0 0 0 13 ACTGAAGCAG RG2 TAGAGCAGCA GGG -210 to -191 68 7.464 98 0 0 3 14 AGCTGCACAG RG3 ACTGGGGACT AGG -132 to -112 85 8.321 86 0 0 0 5 GTAGTAAGAC CNS1 AGATAATGAG TGG -69 to -82 89 8.362 63 0 0 0 4 CGAGCCGGGA CNS2 CGCAGAGCGA GGG -34 to -56 83 8.320 94 0 0 0 8 GAGACCGCAG CNS3 CGCACACACG AGG +5 to +24 83 8.030 56 0 0 1 7 CAGCCGGCAC *Protospacer Adjacent Motif; RG1-3, reference gene promoter-specific sgRNAs; CNS1-3, CNS-promoter specific sgRNAs. The MIT specificity and the Doench efficienty scores ranges from 0-100 and summarizes off-target effects into a single number; the higher the number the fewer off target effects are anticipated. The CRISPRspec score represents overall whole genome off-targeting; all scores were in the high range, indicating low off-target predictions (rth.dk/resources/crispr/crisproff); please see main text for additional references. Table S2a Effects of mismatches in sgRNAs targeting the CNS promoter on in silico off-targets sgRNA Potential Locus, Position CNS vs Scrambled* RG vs scrambled* Off-target number CNS 1 2 mismatches 0 3 mismatches 4 Intergenic MIR5095-CTCFL; chr 20:56017262(-) Not in file Not in file Intron ASAP1; chr6:131204007(+) 0.145-fold down, p=0.007 0.353-fold down, p =2.4E-11 Intergenic AK124832-CA10; chr 17:49479286(+) Not in file Not in file Intergenic AKAP7-ARG1; chr 6:131676375(+) n.s.; not in file n.s.; not in file CNS 2 2 mismatches 0 3 mismatches 8 Intergenic LYRM2-ANKRD6;chr 6:90300681(-) n.s.; n.s. n.s.; n.s. Intergenic TPCN2/BC064339.MYEOV;chr 11:68881239(-) n.s.; not in file n.s.; not in file Intron MAD1L1; chr 7:2122602(-) 0.476-fold up, p=3-19E-12 0.460-fold up, p =4.08E-11 Intergenic FBXO47-LRRC37A11P;chr17:37174551(+) Not in file; n.s. Not in file; n.s. Intron AACS;chr 12:125579071(+) n.s. n.s. Intergenic LOC100130700- Not in file Not in file RNA5SP411/FLJ26245;chr16:34778137(-) Intergenic NCOR2-SCARB1; chr 12:125090098(+) 0.387-fold up, p =1.95E- 0.419-fold up, p=1.69E-11; 10; 0.424-fold up, p=1.4E- 0.140-fold up, p =0.083 09 Intron UMODL1; chr 21:43516739(-) Not in file Not in file CNS 3 2 mismatches 1 Intergenic ZBTB18/AK310634-C1orf100; chr 1:244388184(+) n.s., not in file 0.132-fold-up, p =0.033, not in file 3 mismatches 7 Intron ACOT7;chr 1:6359884(+) 0.358-fold up, p =1.1E-09 0.246-fold up, p =8.90E-05 Intron AYA4;chr 6:133563395(-) n.s. n.s. Intergenic LANCL3-XK;chr X:37544905(+) Not in file Not in file Intron FGFR3;chr 4:1796528(+) 0.0423-fold down, p =0.01 n.s. Intergenic LOC100506207-OFCC1/MRDS1;chr 6:9399387(-) Not in file Not in file Intron BAIAP2;chr 17:79042391(+) n.s. n.s. Intron AJAP1;chr 1:4715528(-) Not in file Not in file *for intergenic regions, the first statement refers to the first gene mentioned and the second statement to the second gene mentioned; n.s., no significant change in expression. Table S2b Effects of mismatches in sgRNAs targeting the reference gene promoter on in silico off-targets sgRNA Potential Locus, Position RG vs scrambled* CNS vs scrambled* Off- target number RG 1 2 mismatches 0 3 mismatches 13 Intron MFSD10;chr 4:2933484 n.s. 0.248-fold up, p=0.0001 Intergenic PCP4-DSCAM;chr 21:41373320(+) Not in file Not in file Intergenic VPS37C-PGA3;chr 11: 609363324 n.s.; not in file n.s.; not in file Intergenic LINC00900-Mir_652;chr 11:115834494 Not in file Not in file Intergenic L37717-ZNF733P, CHR 7:62709008(-) Not in file Not in file Intergenic SEPT7P9;chr 10:38688991 Not in file Not in file Intergenic SEPT7P2;chr 7:45805745 Not in file Not in file Intergenic DL490813-ZNF479; chr. 7:57142701(-) Not in file Not in file Intergenic LOC100287834-MIR4283-1;chr 7:62955844(+) Not in file Not in file Intergenic DQ599872-AK124970;chr 1:224183241(+) Not in file Not in file Intron LOC645513;chr 4:120378771(+) Not in file Not in file Intergenic LOC100288069-LINC00115;chr 1:716961 Not in file Not in file Intergenic DQ599872-AK124970;chr 1224183241(+) Not in file Not in file Intron LOC645513;chr 4:120378771(+) Not in file Not in file Intergenic LOC100288069-LINC00115;chr 1:716961(+) Not in file Not in file Intergenic GABARAPL1-KLRD1;chr 12:10400702(-) n.s.; not in file 0.599-fold down, p= 4.6E-07; not in file RG 2 2 mismatches 3 Intergenic TNS4-CCR7;chr 17:38662563(-) Not in file Intergenic SMARCA4-LDLR;chr 19:11178504(+) n.s.; 0.219-fold up, 0.314-fold up, p =1.7E- p =0.014 09; 0.214-fold up p=0.01 Intron SCAI;chr 9:127874179(+) n.s. n.s. 3 mismatches 14 Intergenic ZCAH2-ZC3H12B;chr X:64689095(+) n.s.; n.s. n.s.; n.s. Intergenic U6atac-AK128059;chr 11:131260302(+) Not in file Not in file Intron WBSCR17;chr 7:70634123(-) Not in file Not in file Intergenic CALN-TYW1B;chr 771949606(-) Not in file; n.s. Not in file, n.s. Intron FAM185A;chr 7102447374(+) n.s. n.s. Intron TNRC6B;chr 22:40443758(-) n.s. 0.163-fold up, p=0.044 Intergenic FGFBP1-FGFBP2;chr 4:15953483(+) Not in file Not in file Intron OPCML;chr 11:132783443(+) Not in file Not in file Intergenic CYB561-ACE;chr 17:61528081 n.s.; n.s. 0.479-fold up, p =1.7E- 08; 0.3-fold up, p =0.0016 Intergenic LOC257396-FST;chr 5:52614293 Not in file Not in file Intergenic HAND1-MIR3141;chr 5:153961950(+) n.s.; not in file 0.434-fold up, p =6.6E- 10; not in file Intergenic TGFB2-LOC643723;chr 1:218917293(-) Not in file Not in file Intergenic PTPRD-JB1753000;chr 9:11502106(+) n.s.; not in file n.s.; not in file Intron LOC285501;chr 4:178904870(+) Not in file Not in file RG 3 2 mismatches 0 3 mismatches 5 Intergenic MFAP3L-BC031941;chr 4:170950596(-) n.s.; not in file n.s.; not in file Intron TNRC6B;chr 22:40529575(+) n.s. 0.163-fold up, p =0.044 Intron THSD7B;chr 2:137900825(-) Not in file Not in file Intergenic AF086294-FSTL4;chr 5:132460458(+) Not in file Not in file Intron SOX5;chr 12:23923679(+) n.s. n.s. *for intergenic regions, the first statement refers to the first gene mentioned and the second statement to the second gene mentioned; n.s., no significant change in expression. Table S3 Activation of CNS or reference PPARGC1A gene promoters and differential expression of genes encoded by mitochondria Gene Mitochondrial CNS PPARGC1A Reference PPARGC1A complex Log2-fold Change p-adj Log2-fold Change p-adj MT-ND1 I 0.330 4.14E-06 0.123 1.02E-01 MT-ND2 I 0.318 1.02E-05 -0.063 4.95E-01 MT-ND3 I 0.206 1.86E-03 -0.114 1.31E-01 MT-ND4 I 0.293 2.44E-04 0.080 4.20E-01 MT-ND4L I 0.599 3.33E-18 0.486 8.20E-12 MT-ND5 I 0.504 7.38E-10 0.230 1.11E-02 MT-ND6 I 1.192 9.89E-58 0.411 2.94E-07 MT-CYB III 0.320 3.82E-06 0.112 1.68E-01 MT-CO1 IV 0.263 1.83E-05 0.104 1.42E-01 MT-CO2 IV 0.286 7.43E-04 0.104 3.06E-01 MT-CO3 IV 0.322 5.02E-06 0.031 7.58E-01 MT-ATP6 V 0.082 2.73E-01 -0.218 2.47E-03 MT-ATP8 V -0.151 1.90E-02 -0.559 1.36E-19 Data show the differences in comparison between CNS or RG promoter activations with transfections of scrambled sgRNA. Table S4 Predicted physical protein-protein interactions and physical Local Network Clusters (STRING) Table S4a Predicted physical protein-protein interactions of proteins encoded by various genes sets Gene set1 Number of Genes Protein-Protein Interactions Average Local Clustering Coefficient (STRING) Predicted Expected P2 RGP all up 872 517 449 0.0010 0.237 CNSP all up 1792 1834 1591 1.5E-09 0.218 RGP selective up 452 138 125 0.1300 0.173 CNSP selective up 1374 963 811 1.1e-07 0.203 RGP up CNSP down 29 18 8 0.0018 0.363 RGP down CNSP up 27 11 6 0.0392 0.262 RGP up CNSP up 391 120 94 0.0064 0.199 1For gene sets refer to Figure 4a; RGP, RG promoter; CNSP, CNS promoter; selectively upregulated genes without down- or upregulation by the activation of the other promoter; RGP up CNSP up refers to genes upregulated by both RG and CNS promoters. 2 The smaller the value, the higher the probability that the proteins encoded by the respective gene set show more interactions among themselves than would be expected for a random set of proteins of similar size, drawn from the genome.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DEDD (NM 001039712) Human Untagged Clone Product Data
    OriGene Technologies, Inc. 9620 Medical Center Drive, Ste 200 Rockville, MD 20850, US Phone: +1-888-267-4436 [email protected] EU: [email protected] CN: [email protected] Product datasheet for SC310813 DEDD (NM_001039712) Human Untagged Clone Product data: Product Type: Expression Plasmids Product Name: DEDD (NM_001039712) Human Untagged Clone Tag: Tag Free Symbol: DEDD Synonyms: CASP8IP1; DEDD1; DEFT; FLDED1; KE05 Vector: pCMV6-Entry (PS100001) E. coli Selection: Kanamycin (25 ug/mL) Cell Selection: Neomycin Fully Sequenced ORF: >NCBI ORF sequence for NM_001039712, the custom clone sequence may differ by one or more nucleotides ATGGCGGGCCTAAAGCGGCGGGCAAGCCAGGTGTGGCCAGAAGAGCATGGTGAGCAGGAACATGGGCTGT ACAGCCTGCACCGCATGTTTGACATCGTGGGCACTCATCTGACACACAGAGATGTGCGCGTGCTTTCTTT CCTCTTTGTTGATGTCATTGATGACCACGAGCGTGGACTCATCCGAAATGGACGTGACTTCTTATTGGCA CTGGAGCGCCAGGGCCGCTGTGATGAAAGTAACTTTCGCCAGGTGCTGCAGCTGCTGCGCATCATCACTC GCCACGACCTGCTGCCCTACGTCACCCTCAAGAGGAGACGGGCTGTGTGCCCTGATCTTGTAGACAAGTA TCTGGAGGAGACATCAATTCGCTATGTGACCCCCAGAGCCCTCAGTGATCCAGAACCAAGGCCTCCCCAG CCCTCTAAAACAGTGCCTCCCCACTATCCTGTGGTGTGTTGCCCCACTTCGGGTCCTCAGATGTGTAGCA AGCGGCCAGCCCGAGGGAGAGCCACACTTGGGAGCCAGCGAAAACGCCGGAAGTCAGTGACACCAGATCC CAAGGAGAAGCAGACATGTGACATCAGACTGCGGGTTCGGGCTGAATACTGCCAGCATGAGACTGCTCTG CAGGGCAATGTCTTCTCTAACAAGCAGGACCCACTTGAGCGCCAGTTTGAGCGCTTTAACCAGGCCAACA CCATCCTCAAGTCCCGGGACCTGGGCTCCATCATCTGTGACATCAAGTTCTCTGAGCTCACCTACCTCGA TGCATTCTGGCGTGACTACATCAATGGCTCTTTATTAGAGGCACTTAAAGGTGTCTTCATCACAGACTCC CTCAAGCAAGCTGTGGGCCATGAAGCCATCAAGCTGCTGGTAAATGTAGACGAGGAGGACTATGAGCTGG
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Functional Interactions During Biogenesis of Epithelial Junctions
    ARTICLE Received 11 Dec 2015 | Accepted 13 Oct 2016 | Published 6 Dec 2016 | Updated 5 Jan 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13542 OPEN Defining functional interactions during biogenesis of epithelial junctions J.C. Erasmus1,*, S. Bruche1,*,w, L. Pizarro1,2,*, N. Maimari1,3,*, T. Poggioli1,w, C. Tomlinson4,J.Lees5, I. Zalivina1,w, A. Wheeler1,w, A. Alberts6, A. Russo2 & V.M.M. Braga1 In spite of extensive recent progress, a comprehensive understanding of how actin cytoskeleton remodelling supports stable junctions remains to be established. Here we design a platform that integrates actin functions with optimized phenotypic clustering and identify new cytoskeletal proteins, their functional hierarchy and pathways that modulate E-cadherin adhesion. Depletion of EEF1A, an actin bundling protein, increases E-cadherin levels at junctions without a corresponding reinforcement of cell–cell contacts. This unexpected result reflects a more dynamic and mobile junctional actin in EEF1A-depleted cells. A partner for EEF1A in cadherin contact maintenance is the formin DIAPH2, which interacts with EEF1A. In contrast, depletion of either the endocytic regulator TRIP10 or the Rho GTPase activator VAV2 reduces E-cadherin levels at junctions. TRIP10 binds to and requires VAV2 function for its junctional localization. Overall, we present new conceptual insights on junction stabilization, which integrate known and novel pathways with impact for epithelial morphogenesis, homeostasis and diseases. 1 National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 2 Computing Department, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 3 Bioengineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 4 Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Genomic Analysis of Hyperlipidemia, Obesity and Diabetes Using (C57BL/6J × TALLYHO/Jngj) F2 Mice
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Nutrition Publications and Other Works Nutrition 12-19-2010 Genetic and genomic analysis of hyperlipidemia, obesity and diabetes using (C57BL/6J × TALLYHO/JngJ) F2 mice Taryn P. Stewart Marshall University Hyoung Y. Kim University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Arnold M. Saxton University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Jung H. Kim Marshall University Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_nutrpubs Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, and the Nutrition Commons Recommended Citation BMC Genomics 2010, 11:713 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-713 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nutrition at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nutrition Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stewart et al. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:713 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/713 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Genetic and genomic analysis of hyperlipidemia, obesity and diabetes using (C57BL/6J × TALLYHO/JngJ) F2 mice Taryn P Stewart1, Hyoung Yon Kim2, Arnold M Saxton3, Jung Han Kim1* Abstract Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the most common form of diabetes in humans and is closely associated with dyslipidemia and obesity that magnifies the mortality and morbidity related to T2D. The genetic contribution to human T2D and related metabolic disorders is evident, and mostly follows polygenic inheritance. The TALLYHO/ JngJ (TH) mice are a polygenic model for T2D characterized by obesity, hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose uptake and tolerance, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia.
    [Show full text]
  • C-Terminal Region (ARP58987 P050) Data Sheet
    CASP3 antibody - C-terminal region (ARP58987_P050) Data Sheet Product Number ARP58987_P050 Product Name CASP3 antibody - C-terminal region (ARP58987_P050) Size 50ug Gene Symbol CASP3 Alias Symbols CPP32; CPP32B; SCA-1 Nucleotide Accession# NM_032991 Protein Size (# AA) 277 amino acids Molecular Weight 12kDa Product Format Lyophilized powder NCBI Gene Id 836 Host Rabbit Clonality Polyclonal Official Gene Full Name Caspase 3, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase Gene Family CASP This is a rabbit polyclonal antibody against CASP3. It was validated on Western Blot by Aviva Systems Biology. At Aviva Systems Biology we manufacture rabbit polyclonal antibodies on a large scale (200-1000 Description products/month) of high throughput manner. Our antibodies are peptide based and protein family oriented. We usually provide antibodies covering each member of a whole protein family of your interest. We also use our best efforts to provide you antibodies recognize various epitopes of a target protein. For availability of antibody needed for your experiment, please inquire (). Peptide Sequence Synthetic peptide located within the following region: NLKYEVRNKNDLTREEIVELMRDVSKEDHSKRSSFVCVLLSHGEEGIIFG CASP3 is a protein which is a member of the cysteine-aspartic acid protease (caspase) family. Sequential activation of caspases plays a central role in the execution-phase of cell apoptosis. Caspases exist as inactive proenzymes which undergo proteolytic processing at conserved aspartic residues to produce two subunits, Description of Target large and small, that dimerize to form the active enzyme. This protein cleaves and activates caspases 6, 7 and 9, and the protein itself is processed by caspases 8, 9 and 10. It is the predominant caspase involved in the cleavage of amyloid-beta 4A precursor protein, which is associated with neuronal death in Alzheimer's disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Aneuploidy: Using Genetic Instability to Preserve a Haploid Genome?
    Health Science Campus FINAL APPROVAL OF DISSERTATION Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Science (Cancer Biology) Aneuploidy: Using genetic instability to preserve a haploid genome? Submitted by: Ramona Ramdath In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Science Examination Committee Signature/Date Major Advisor: David Allison, M.D., Ph.D. Academic James Trempe, Ph.D. Advisory Committee: David Giovanucci, Ph.D. Randall Ruch, Ph.D. Ronald Mellgren, Ph.D. Senior Associate Dean College of Graduate Studies Michael S. Bisesi, Ph.D. Date of Defense: April 10, 2009 Aneuploidy: Using genetic instability to preserve a haploid genome? Ramona Ramdath University of Toledo, Health Science Campus 2009 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my grandfather who died of lung cancer two years ago, but who always instilled in us the value and importance of education. And to my mom and sister, both of whom have been pillars of support and stimulating conversations. To my sister, Rehanna, especially- I hope this inspires you to achieve all that you want to in life, academically and otherwise. ii Acknowledgements As we go through these academic journeys, there are so many along the way that make an impact not only on our work, but on our lives as well, and I would like to say a heartfelt thank you to all of those people: My Committee members- Dr. James Trempe, Dr. David Giovanucchi, Dr. Ronald Mellgren and Dr. Randall Ruch for their guidance, suggestions, support and confidence in me. My major advisor- Dr. David Allison, for his constructive criticism and positive reinforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Elabscience®
    Tel:240-252-7368(USA) Fax:240-252-7376(USA) www.elabscience.com ® E-mail:[email protected] Elabscience Elabscience Biotechnology Inc. DEDD Polyclonal Antibody Catalog No. E-AB-67706 Reactivity H,M,R Storage Store at -20°C. Avoid freeze / thaw cycles. Host Rabbit Applications IHC Isotype IgG Note: Centrifuge before opening to ensure complete recovery of vial contents. Images Immunogen Information Immunogen Recombinant fusion protein of human DEDD (NP_001034801.1). GeneID 9191 Swissprot O75618 Synonyms DEDD,CASP8IP1,DEDD1,DEFT,FLDED1,KE05 Immunohistochemistry of paraffin- Product Information embedded Rat lung using DEDD Buffer PBS with 0.02% sodium azide, 50% glycerol, pH7.3. Polyclonal Antibody at dilution of Purify Affinity purification 1:100 (40x lens). Dilution IHC 1:50-1:100 Background This gene encodes a protein that contains a death effector domain (DED). DED is a protein-protein interaction domain shared by adaptors, Immunohistochemistry of paraffin- regulators and executors of the programmed cell death pathway. embedded Human esophagus using Overexpression of this gene was shown to induce weak apoptosis. Upon DEDD Polyclonal Antibody at dilution stimulation, this protein was found to translocate from cytoplasm to of 1:100 (40x lens). nucleus and colocalize with UBTF, a basal factor required for RNA polymerase I transcription, in the nucleolus. At least three transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. Immunohistochemistry of paraffin- embedded Mouse kidney using DEDD Polyclonal Antibody at dilution of 1:100 (40x lens). For Research Use Only Focus on your research Thank you for your recent purchase. If you would like to learn more about antibodies,please visit www.elabscience.com.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Gene Connectome As a Map of Short Cuts for Morbid Allele Discovery
    The human gene connectome as a map of short cuts for morbid allele discovery Yuval Itana,1, Shen-Ying Zhanga,b, Guillaume Vogta,b, Avinash Abhyankara, Melina Hermana, Patrick Nitschkec, Dror Friedd, Lluis Quintana-Murcie, Laurent Abela,b, and Jean-Laurent Casanovaa,b,f aSt. Giles Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Rockefeller Branch, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065; bLaboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, Paris Descartes University, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U980, Necker Medical School, 75015 Paris, France; cPlateforme Bioinformatique, Université Paris Descartes, 75116 Paris, France; dDepartment of Computer Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel; eUnit of Human Evolutionary Genetics, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité de Recherche Associée 3012, Institut Pasteur, F-75015 Paris, France; and fPediatric Immunology-Hematology Unit, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, 75015 Paris, France Edited* by Bruce Beutler, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, and approved February 15, 2013 (received for review October 19, 2012) High-throughput genomic data reveal thousands of gene variants to detect a single mutated gene, with the other polymorphic genes per patient, and it is often difficult to determine which of these being of less interest. This goes some way to explaining why, variants underlies disease in a given individual. However, at the despite the abundance of NGS data, the discovery of disease- population level, there may be some degree of phenotypic homo- causing alleles from such data remains somewhat limited. geneity, with alterations of specific physiological pathways under- We developed the human gene connectome (HGC) to over- come this problem.
    [Show full text]
  • MCL1 and DEDD Promote Urothelial Carcinoma Progression
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 18, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0963 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. MCL1 and DEDD promote urothelial carcinoma progression Andrew L. Hong1,2,3, Jennifer L. Guerriero2, Mihir B. Doshi3, Bryan D. Kynnap2, Won Jun Kim2, Anna C. Schinzel2, Rebecca Modiste2, Amy J. Schlauch2, Rosalyn M. Adam1, David J. Kwiatkowski2,4, Rameen Beroukhim2,3, Anthony Letai2, Jonathan E. Rosenberg5,6,7, William C. Hahn2,3,4,7 1Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, USA 2Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215 USA 3Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 415 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02142 USA 4Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115 USA 5Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, USA. 6Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. 7These authors jointly directed this work. Running title: MCL1 and DEDD promote urothelial carcinoma progression The authors declare the following competing financial interests: J.L.G. receives sponsored research support from Eli Lilly and GlaxoSmithKline and is a paid consultant for GlaxoSmithKline. D.J.K. is a consultant for Genentech, AADi, and Novartis. R.B. receives 1 Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2019 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 18, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0963 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Programmed Necrotic Death Initiated by Intrinsic Death Signals Gary Xiaoshi Wang Washington University in St
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) Spring 3-19-2014 Molecular Mechanisms of Programmed Necrotic Death Initiated by Intrinsic Death Signals Gary Xiaoshi Wang Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Recommended Citation Wang, Gary Xiaoshi, "Molecular Mechanisms of Programmed Necrotic Death Initiated by Intrinsic Death Signals" (2014). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 1267. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/1267 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences Molecular Cell Biology Dissertation Examination Committee: Emily H.-Y. Cheng, Chair Kendall J. Blumer, Co-Chair Ron Bose Shin-ichiro Imai Gerald P. Linette Jason C. Mills Zhongsheng You Molecular Mechanisms of Programmed Necrotic Death Initiated by Intrinsic Death Signals by Gary Xiaoshi Wang A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2014 Saint Louis, Missouri 1 © 2014, Gary Xiaoshi Wang TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………………..iv
    [Show full text]
  • Death Effector Domain–Containing Protein (DEDD) Is Required for Uterine Decidualization During Early Pregnancy in Mice
    Death effector domain–containing protein (DEDD) is required for uterine decidualization during early pregnancy in mice Mayumi Mori, … , Satoko Arai, Toru Miyazaki J Clin Invest. 2011;121(1):318-327. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI44723. Research Article Reproductive biology During intrauterine life, the mammalian embryo survives via its physical connection to the mother. The uterine decidua, which differentiates from stromal cells after implantation in a process known as decidualization, plays essential roles in supporting embryonic growth before establishment of the placenta. Here we show that female mice lacking death effector domain–containing protein (DEDD) are infertile owing to unsuccessful decidualization. In uteri of Dedd–/– mice, development of the decidual zone and the surrounding edema after embryonic implantation was defective. This was subsequently accompanied by disintegration of implantation site structure, leading to embryonic death before placentation. Polyploidization, a hallmark of mature decidual cells, was attenuated in DEDD-deficient cells during decidualization. Such inefficient decidualization appeared to be caused by decreased Akt levels, since polyploidization was restored in DEDD-deficient decidual cells by overexpression of Akt. In addition, we showed that DEDD associates with and stabilizes cyclin D3, an important element in polyploidization, and that overexpression of cyclin D3 in DEDD- deficient cells improved polyploidization. These results indicate that DEDD is indispensable for the establishment of an adequate
    [Show full text]
  • Unifying the Genomics-Based Classes of Cancer Fusion Gene Partners: Large Cancer Fusion Genes Are Evolutionarily Conserved
    CANCER GENOMICS & PROTEOMICS 9: 389-396 (2012) Unifying the Genomics-based Classes of Cancer Fusion Gene Partners: Large Cancer Fusion Genes Are Evolutionarily Conserved LIBIA M. PAVA, DANIEL T. MORTON, REN CHEN and GEORGE BLANCK Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, U.S.A. Abstract. Background: Genes that fuse to cause cancer have fusion of NPM and ALK in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma been studied to determine molecular bases for proliferation, to (3); ABL and BCR in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) develop diagnostic tools, and as targets for drugs. To facilitate (4, 5); and C-MYC and IgH in Burkitt’s lymphoma in (6), identification of additional, cancer fusion genes, following among many others. The detection and understanding of the observation of a chromosomal translocation, we have ABL-BCR fusion protein, which stimulates unregulated cell characterized the genomic features of the fusion gene partners. division and leads to leukemia, led to the development of Previous work indicated that cancer fusion gene partners, are Gleevec, a drug able to block the ATP-binding site of the either large or evolutionarily conserved in comparison to the tyrosine kinase domain of ABL-BCR, halting CML (7). This neighboring genes in the region of a chromosomal extraordinary success has led to the hope of designing drugs translocation. These results raised the question of whether targeted against other cancer fusion proteins. large cancer fusion gene partners were also evolutionarily There are about 50,000 unstudied translocations, raising conserved. Methods and Results: We developed two methods the question of whether that information can continue to be for quantifying evolutionary conservation values, allowing the used to facilitate the identification of fusion genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Func6onal Profiling from Babelomics 5
    Func%onal profiling from Babelomics 5 Dan Crespo [email protected] March 3th, 2016 Where are we? General NGS pipeline: Func9onal analysis: • Single enrichment: Fa9GO • Gene set enrichment: Logisc Model Genomics Transcriptomics Where are we? Func9onal analysis Implemented in: Differenal expression hp://babelomics.org Genes Gene Sets Fa9GO GSA logisc model Ques9ons we try to answer • Is there any significant func%onal enrichment in my gene list / gene sets? Ques9ons we try to answer • Is there any significat func%onal enrichment in my gene list / gene sets? • Are these genes involved in common pathways? Ques9ons we try to answer • Is there any significat func%onal enrichment in my gene list / gene sets? • Are these genes involved in common pathways? • Do they share specific regulaon? Ques9ons we try to answer • Is there any significat func%onal enrichment in my gene list / gene sets? • Are these genes involved in common pathways? • Do they share specific regulaon? • Are they involved in the same disease? Babelomics 5: FaGO Single enrichment Comparison between two list of genes with user defined annotaons Single enrichment Comparison between two list of genes with user defined annotaons List 1: User provided List 2: Func9onal annotaons: • Gene symbols • User provided • Pre-defined annotaons • Probe Ids • Rest of genome • Custom annotaons • Entrez Ids … • Complementary list Mul9ple tesng context Fisher exact test Benjamini – Hochberg p-value correcon Ranked results Single enrichment List 1 List 2 Func9onal annotaons AATF BIRC7 CIAS1 PEA15 ACTA1 DNAI1 KIF3B
    [Show full text]