DOCSLIB.ORG

Who Are the Dugpas Print

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Who Are the Dugpas Print Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle, June 2009 In the early Theosophical writings, H. P. Blavatsky used the term “dugpa” for the various non-Gelugpa orders of Tibetan Buddhism, namely, for the Kagyupa, Nyingmapa, and Sakyapa orders. In doing this, she followed the usage of Western writers of the time. These writers indiscriminately termed all of these orders as “Red Caps,” “Shammars,” and “Dugpas,” or “Dukpas.” Blavatsky additionally used the term “dugpa” for followers of the non-Buddhist Bon religion of Tibet. We know that Blavatsky used the books of these writers because she often quotes them. Indeed, she drew the term “Kiu-te,” a phonetic spelling of the Tibetan rgyud sde that long baffled researchers, from Narratives of the Mission of George Bogle to Tibet, and of the Journey of Thomas Manning to Lhasa, published in London in 1876 (2nd ed. 1879). The editor of this book, Clements R. Markham, writes about the dugpas or dukpas in his Introduction: In the middle of the fourteenth century a great reforming Lama arose in Tibet, named Tsong-khapa, . His reforms led to a schism in the Tibetan church. The old sect, which resisted all change, adhered to their dress, and are called Shammars, or Dukpas, and Red Caps. Their chief monastery is at Sakia-jong, and they retain supremacy in Nepal and Bhutan. (p. xlvi) As may be seen, Markham lumped together all those who did not follow Tsongkhapa’s new order, the Gelugpas, as the “old sect,” calling them “Shammars, or Dukpas, and Red Caps.” Moreover, in the then prevailing ignorance of things Tibetan, he stated that the headquarters of the Red Caps is at Sakia-jong. the great monastery of Sakia-jong (Sankia of D’Anville), the head-quarters of the Red Cap sect of Buddhists. (p. xxviii) 2 Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? In fact, Sakia-jong, or Sakya-dzong, is the headquarters of only one “red cap” order, the Sakyapas. Markham did, however, give information from Brian Hodgson that would place the actual dugpas in Bhutan, not at Sakya-dzong in Tibet. While the Gelukpa, or Yellow sect, is in the ascendant in Tibet, the adherents of the older, but now heretical Red sect, still have a large monastery at Sakia-jong, and have retained supremacy among the Buddhists in Nepal and Bhutan, on the slopes of the Southern Himalaya. Mr. Brian Hodgson, who is unrivalled in his knowledge of the Cis-nivean Himalayan races, divides the inhabitants of the region between the Kali and the Monass into ten tribes, the Cis-Himalayan Bhotias or Tibetans in the upper zone, the Sienwar, Gurung, Magar, Murmi, Newar, Kirati, and Limbu, in Nepal; the Lepcha in Sikkim, and Lhopa or Dukpa* (Bhutanese) in Bhutan. *footnote: Lho is the native name of Bhutan. Lhopa is therefore a territorial designation, while Dukpa refers to their belonging to the Red Cap sect. (p. lii) Notice that already Markham refers to the red caps with the pejorative term “heretical.” We will return to this shortly. But at present we must find out just who the dugpas or dukpas really are. Markham shows in his footnote that he understands Dukpa to refer to the Red Cap sect. It is followed in Bhutan, in agreement with Brian Hodgson, and also in Sikkim according to Markham. The Lepchas of Sikkim are ruled over by a dynasty of Rajahs originally from Lhasa, who have always been under the domin- ion of Tibet, and of the Buddhist religion and Dukpa (Red Cap) sect. (p. lxxxii) Again, Markham equates the Dukpa with the “Red Cap” orders in general. But in fact, dugpa or dukpa is ’brug pa, the Kagyu sub-order that prevails in Bhutan, not in Sikkim. That this is a separate order or “sect” of Tibetan Buddhism was made known in an earlier book also quoted by Blavatsky, Buddhism in Tibet, by Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? 3 Emil Schlagintweit, published in Leipzig and London in 1863. Under the heading, "Buddhist sects in Tibet," pp. 72 ff., he lists nine orders: the Nyigmapa, Urgyenpa, Kadampa, Sakyapa, Gelukpa, Kargyutpa, Karmapa, Brikungpa, and Brugpa. The ninth and last he describes as: The Brugpa (also Dugpa or Dad Dugpa) sect has established a particular worship of the Dorje (Vajra, or thunderbolt), which descended from heaven and fell upon the earth at Séra in East- ern Tíbet. This sect seems, moreover, to be particularly addicted to the Tantrika mysticism, in which the Dorje is considered as a very important and powerful instrument. (p. 74) Here we see that the Dugpa is a distinct order of Tibetan Buddhism, the Brugpa, and not the “red caps” in general, who would be all of the orders except the Gelugpa, or “yellow caps.” But not until L. Austine Waddell’s 1895 book, The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism (London: W. H. Allen & Co.) was this error among Western writers addressed. Waddell correctly describes the Dug-pa (’brug pa) as a sub-sect of the Kagyupas, pointing out that the name Dug-pa has been wrongly used in European books. Under the heading, “The Kar-gyu-pa Sect,” he writes: The next great sub-sect is the Dug-pa* [*footnote: 'brug-pa . .], which also arose with a pupil of Mila-rä-pa’s disciple, Dvag-po. Much confusion has been caused in European books by mis- using the name Dug-pa, employing it as a synonym for the “red-hat” sect, which properly is the Ôi∫-ma. (p. 68) But Waddell introduces a new error here, in saying that the “red-hat” sect is properly the Nyingma. In fact, all the orders except the Gelugpa wear red hats when hats are used. He no doubt meant that only the Nyingmas are entirely unreformed. Under the heading, “The Ôi∫-ma-pa Sects,” he writes further: The wholly unreformed section of the Låmas was, as we have seen, named Ôi∫-ma-pa, or “the old school.” It is more freely than any other tinged with the native Bön or pre-Buddhist 4 Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? practices; and celibacy and abstinence are rarely practised. This is the real “red-hat” sect of Låmas, and not the Dug-pa as is stated in European books. (p. 72) So we see that early European writers on Tibet referred to all the non-Gelugpa orders of Tibetan Buddhism as Dugpas. Moreover, even in Waddell’s book we notice a rather pejorative tone in his description of the “red-hats.” There was, historically, actual fighting and warfare between Gelugpas and Kagyupas for supremacy and state rule. This inevitably produces ill-will and prejudice. Markham notes in his book that a Chinese emperor attempted to reconcile the two factions. As regards Tibet, an embassy had been sent to Lhasa by the Em- peror Kang-hi, to reconcile the Yellow and Red Cap factions, . (p. lxi) The prevailing attitude of prejudice between the two parties is clearly portrayed in the 1774 account written by George Bogle, found in Markham’s book: It may be necessary to state that there are two sets of clergy in Tibet, distinguished by, and classed under the names of, Yellow Caps and Red Caps. The Dalai and Teshu Lamas are at the head of the Yellow Caps; the Red Caps have their own Lamas and monasteries. In times of old there were violent disputes between them, in which the Yellow Caps got the victory, as well by the assistance of the Tatars as by their superior sanctity. But as I ad- here to the tenets of this sect, and have acquired my knowledge of religion from its votaries, I will not here say much upon the subject, lest it should be thought spiteful. I may be allowed, how- ever, just to mention two things, which must convince every un- prejudiced person of the wicked lives and false doctrines of the Red Caps. In the first place, many of the clergy marry; and in the next, they persist, in opposition to religion and common sense, in wearing Red Caps. The priests who now visited us were of this last sect. There might be about eight of them. Each held a staff in one hand and a rosary in the other. They formed into a circle, Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? 5 and began to chant their prayers, which, as I understood they were put up for my welfare, I was in no haste to interrupt. At length, to show them that, however hostile to their principles, I bore them no personal grudge, I dismissed them with a few small pieces of silver." (pp. 179-180) Thus, not only did Blavatsky follow the usage then current, of referring indiscriminately to all the non-Gelugpa orders of Tibetan Buddhism as “Red Caps,” “Shammars,” and “Dugpas” (including also the non-Buddhist Bons), she also followed the then current prejudice against these orders. Whether or not there is any basis to this prejudice beyond historical animosities is another question. For now, I will conclude with a quotation from Blavatsky indicating that she did believe there were among these orders dugpas in the sense in which she often used the term, as black magicians or “Brothers of the Shadow”: In the East, they are known as the “Brothers of the Shadow,” living men possessed by the earth-bound elementaries; at times—their masters, but ever in the long run falling victims to these terrible beings. In Sikkim and Tibet they are called Dug-pas (red-caps), in contra-distinction to the Geluk-pas (yel- low-caps), to which latter most of the adepts belong.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VT Module6 Lineage Text Major Schools of Tibetan Buddhism
    THE MAJOR SCHOOLS OF TIBETAN BUDDHISM By Pema Khandro A BIRD’S EYE VIEW 1. NYINGMA LINEAGE a. Pema Khandro’s lineage. Literally means: ancient school or old school. Nyingmapas rely on the old tantras or the original interpretation of Tantra as it was given from Padmasambhava. b. Founded in 8th century by Padmasambhava, an Indian Yogi who synthesized the teachings of the Indian MahaSiddhas, the Buddhist Tantras, and Dzogchen. He gave this teaching (known as Vajrayana) in Tibet. c. Systemizes Buddhist philosophy and practice into 9 Yanas. The Inner Tantras (what Pema Khandro Rinpoche teaches primarily) are the last three. d. It is not a centralized hierarchy like the Sarma (new translation schools), which have a figure head similar to the Pope. Instead, the Nyingma tradition is de-centralized, with every Lama is the head of their own sangha. There are many different lineages within the Nyingma. e. A major characteristic of the Nyingma tradition is the emphasis in the Tibetan Yogi tradition – the Ngakpa tradition. However, once the Sarma translations set the tone for monasticism in Tibet, the Nyingmas also developed a monastic and institutionalized segment of the tradition. But many Nyingmas are Ngakpas or non-monastic practitioners. f. A major characteristic of the Nyingma tradition is that it is characterized by treasure revelations (gterma). These are visionary revelations of updated communications of the Vajrayana teachings. Ultimately treasure revelations are the same dharma principles but spoken in new ways, at new times and new places to new people. Because of these each treasure tradition is unique, this is the major reason behind the diversity within the Nyingma.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tulku System in Tibetan Buddhism: Its Reliability, Orthodoxy and Social Impacts
    The Tulku System in Tibetan Buddhism: Its Reliability, Orthodoxy and Social Impacts By Ramin Etesami A thesis submitted to the graduate school in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the International Buddhist College, Thailand March, 20 Abstract The Tulku institution is a unique characteristic of Tibetan Buddhism with a central role in this tradition, to the extent that it is present in almost every aspect of Tibet’s culture and tradition. However, despite this central role and the scope and diversity of the socio-religious aspects of the institution, only a few studies have so far been conducted to shed light on it. On the other hand, an aura of sacredness; distorted pictures projected by the media and film industries;political propaganda and misinformation; and tendencies to follow a pattern of cult behavior; have made the Tulku institution a highly controversial topic for research; and consequently, an objective study of the institution based on a critical approach is difficult. The current research is an attempt to comprehensively examine different dimensions of the Tulku tradition with an emphasis on the issue of its orthodoxy with respect to the core doctrines of Buddhism and the social implications of the practice. In this research, extreme caution has been practiced to firstly, avoid any kind of bias rooted in faith and belief; and secondly, to follow a scientific methodology in reviewing evidence and scriptures related to the research topic. Through a comprehensive study of historical accounts, core Buddhist texts and hagiographic literature, this study has found that while the basic Buddhist doctrines allow the possibility for a Buddhist teacher or an advanced practitioner to “return back to accomplish his tasks, the lack of any historical precedence which can be viewed as a typical example of the practice in early Buddhism makes the issue of its orthodoxy equivocal and relative.
    [Show full text]
  • Spread of Buddhism in Ladakh (From 2 BCE to 9
    Spread of Buddhism in Ladakh (From 2nd BCE to 9th CE) Dr. Mohd Ashraf Dar Cont. Assistant Professor, Department of History, Cluster University, Srinagar Abstract: Jammu and Kashmir State of India is still a blooming orchard of Buddhism. In this paper an attempt has been made to analyse how Buddhism reached Ladakh and why it is flourishing there till date. Oral traditions have also been used in this study. During the course of present study, Interdisciplinary approach of research methodology has been applied. Key Words: Ladakh, Buddhism, Bon-chos, Lamaism, Tantra, Tibetan Buddhism Introduction: Buddhism as a new religion was born in India and soon became the faith of multitude especially in the Gangetic region. It got the patronage of some powerful monarchs especially Asoka Maurya and Kaniska . It is generally believed that Buddhism spread to the other regions of India as well as outside the India due to the zealous efforts of missionaries for which monasteries provided a strong base. Kashmir the immediate neighbor of Ladakh got the gospel of Buddha as depicted in some primary sources regarding the history of Kashmir like Rajtarangini as early as 2nd BCE. Kashmir remained the hub of Buddhism for next 11 centuries till it was ousted from Kashmir as from the other parts of India. Ladakh is perhaps the only region in India where Buddhism not only remained till date but flourished as well. It even was able to sustain itself after the introduction of Islam to this region by Syed Ali Hamdani. What matters most here is to know when and to whom was the gospel of Buddha preached in Ladakh.
    [Show full text]
  • The Karmapa Controversy
    The Karmapa controversy A compilation of information 1 Foreword This work fills a requirement: to provide all meaningful information for a good understanding about the Karmapa controversy which, since 1992, shakes up the Karma Kagyu lineage. While web surfing, one can notice the huge information unbalance between the two differing sides: on Situ Rinpoche's side, there is plenty of documentation, while that on Shamar Rinpoche's side is sparse. On Situ Rinpoche's side, many websites give out information, with some, dedicated to this task, having almost daily updates. By comparison, Shamar Rinpoche side does not even provide the minimum information sufficient to understand its point of view. Now, complete information easily found is essential for everyone to make up one's opinion. To limit oneself to only one version of the facts does not allow for a full understanding and leads to all extremes, which we have sorely witnessed since 1992. Studying this controversy, one is surprised by the distressing level of disinformation and ignorance surrounding it. Few people know truly the circumstances and the unfolding of all these events which profoundly shook our lineage. Most contented themselves with adopting the view point of their entourage, siding either way, bringing up real quarrels and polemics between disciples of the same masters. It even came up to murders and monasteries attacks ! And yet, without going for any debate or confrontation, simply acquainting oneself with information provided by each side, allows us to stand back, to grasp the ins and outs in a more objective way and finally to reach a valid opinion in this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tibet-Dzungar Ideological Alliance's Challenge to the Qing
    The Tibet-Dzungar Ideological Alliance’s Challenge to the Qing Empire and the Adaptation of Qing Ideology in the mid- 18th century Master’s Thesis (credits 45) Author: Xinyang Wang Supervisor: John Hennessey Seminar chair: Margaret Hunt Semester: Spring 2021 HISTORISKA INSTITUTIONEN Abstract The Yellow Hat Sect of Tibetan Buddhism exerted an important influence on the ideology of the Dzungar Empire and the Qing Empire. At the end of the 16th century, the rise of the Romanov and the Qing squeezed the living space of nomads. The Mongols, including the Dzungars, chose to convert to Tibetan Buddhism to regulate the increasing internal and external tensions. In the 17th and 18th centuries, the power structure of Central Eurasia continuously changed with the expansion of the Yellow Hat Sect’s cross-regional religious, political and economic systems and religious wars. By the 1740s, the Qing Empire established a new order in Tibet and its surrounding areas, as well as Mongolia, in other words, in most Tibetan Buddhist areas except Dzungaria. Due to the special relationship between the Dzungar and Tibet, the Dzungar constantly challenged the new ideological order constructed by the Qing with the “irrational” request of inviting Tibetan lamas. In response, the Qing constantly adjusted its strategy, which is the main problem discussed in this thesis. The ideological conflict between the two eventually led to a war that eliminated the Dzungar and the attempt to ontologically homogenize the Qing Empire in the post-Dzungar era. 1 Acknowledgements Thanks to my supervisor John Hennessey, who made me discover my interest in Qing ideology and has encouraged and helped me to study this topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Films and Videos on Tibet
    FILMS AND VIDEOS ON TIBET Last updated: 15 July 2012 This list is maintained by A. Tom Grunfeld ( [email protected] ). It was begun many years ago (in the early 1990s?) by Sonam Dargyay and others have contributed since. I welcome - and encourage - any contributions of ideas, suggestions for changes, corrections and, of course, additions. All the information I have available to me is on this list so please do not ask if I have any additional information because I don't. I have seen only a few of the films on this list and, therefore, cannot vouch for everything that is said about them. Whenever possible I have listed the source of the information. I will update this list as I receive additional information so checking it periodically would be prudent. This list has no copyright; I gladly share it with whomever wants to use it. I would appreciate, however, an acknowledgment when the list, or any part, of it is used. The following represents a resource list of films and videos on Tibet. For more information about acquiring these films, contact the distributors directly. Office of Tibet, 241 E. 32nd Street, New York, NY 10016 (212-213-5010) Wisdom Films (Wisdom Publications no longer sells these films. If anyone knows the address of the company that now sells these films, or how to get in touch with them, I would appreciate it if you could let me know. Many, but not all, of their films are sold by Meridian Trust.) Meridian Trust, 330 Harrow Road, London W9 2HP (01-289-5443)http://www.meridian-trust/.org Mystic Fire Videos, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iconography of Nepalese Buddhism
    TheThe IconographyIconography ofof NepaleseNepalese BuddhismBuddhism by Min Bahadur Shakya HAN DD ET U 'S B B O RY eOK LIBRA E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.buddhanet.net Buddha Dharma Education Association Inc. P H A N I C- ZDH / T A P P H A N / M, T P. O. B N: , K, N e of Nepalese Buddhism M B S v A A Min Bahadur Shakya is a scholar of Newar and Tibetan Buddhism. Among his major publications are hort istory of uddhism in epal, . ntroduction to uddhist onasteries of athmandu alley, . He was elected Vice President of World Fellowship of Buddhist Youth WFBY for the years –. His major re- search work on ife and ontribution of epalese rincess hrikuti evi is shortly forthcoming. Mr. Shakya was nomi- nated by Venerable Master Hsing Yun, Fokuang Shan, Taiwan as Research Associate in Fokuang Shan Chinese Buddhist Research Academy for the years –. In , he was granted a SAARC Fellowship (Buddhist Studies) by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, impu, Bhutan. Currently he is working as the Chief Editor of uddhist ima- laya, a bi-annual journal dealing with Buddhism in the Hima- layan regions. He has also contributed more a dozen research papers in reputed foreign journals. Since , he is teaching in Engineering Institute, Pulchowk Campus, Lalitpur. Presently he is the Director, Nagarjuna Institute of Exact Methods. F Under the definition of andicrafts there are multiple products. Of them the statues of gods and goddesses of Buddhism and Hinduism stand foremost.eir importance is enhanced not only because of the fact that they are hand made but also that they are made by using meticulously time-consuming traditional tech- v niques: Lost Wax Process, Chiselling, antique finishing and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamaism in Tibet--A Brief Survey
    Lamaism in Tibet A Brief Survey B. Ghosh. There is no denying the fact that Buddhism spread not only in India but also in the remote countries of the world from caucasus to Kamchatka and Buryat Siberia to ladakh, Sikkim, Bhutan and Nepal and played an important part in the religious life of the people of those countries for several centuries. Before the introduction of Buddhism in Tibet, Bon was the sale religion there till the 7th century A. D. In this context it may be pointed out here that Bon was a primitive type of religion with the dominating Shamaism. a kind of sorcery working on psychic levels, a form of nature worship with sacrifice to vaguely defined gods of earth and sky. The seventh century A. D. (569-649 A. D. or 617·697 A. D.) witnessed the introduction of Buddhism in Tibet during the reign of king Srong Tsan Gam po. his two wives, one Chinese Kong-jo revered as the incarnation of goddess Tara (Tibetan Sgrol·ma-Dolma) and the other Nepalese Princess Bhrikuti Devi said to be the incarna­ tion of goddess Sarasvati. They prevailed upon the king to introduce Saddharma i.e .• Buddhism in Tibet, which in course· of time became the State religion of Tibet. The king thus became very famous in the history of Tibet and was known as Chos-rgyal-Dharmaraja. It is pertinent to point out here to a great event in the Tibetan history during his reign. One of his celebrated ministers Thomi Sambota (The noble Bhota-as Tibetan say) was sent to India with sixteen other scholars for studying the art and sciences of Brahmanas as well as the Buddhists.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of Tibetology
    BULLETIN OF TIBETOLOGY NEW SERIES 1981 NO. 4 18 NOVEMB ER 1981 SIKKIM RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TIBETOLOGY & OTHER BODDHIST STUDIES GANGTOK, INDIA The Bulletin of Tibetology seeks to serve the specialist as well as the general reader with an interest in this field of study. The picture portrays Tibetology's massive building in the typical Himalayan Architectural Style. Editor: Dr. A. C. Banerjee Director: SRIT BULLETIN OF TIBETOLOGY 1981 NO. 4 r 18 NOVEMBER 1981 SIKKIMRESEAftCH INSTITUTE OF TIBETOLOGY GANGTOK, INDIA. L.HABAB THUCHEN 18 NOVEMBER 1~81 Price Rs. 10/­ For supply overseas ( including air postage) £. 1.50 ( British Sterling) 4/81 Printed at Impression. Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Gangtok and published by the Director, Sikkim Research Institute of Tibetologv. Gangtok-737 1 01. CONTRIBUTORS IN THIS ISSUE Dr. A. C. Banerjee. M. A., lL. B., Ph. D., F. A. S., F. R. A. S. (london) Bhajagovinda Ghosh, librarian SRIT. Views expressed in the Bulletin of Tibetology are those of the contributors and not of the Sikkim Research Institute of Tibetology. An article represents the Private individual views of the author and does not reflect those of any office or institution with which the author may be associated. The editor is the publisher of the Article (s): copyright of an article belongs to the author. unless otherwise indicated. co' ,,,,_, ~ I.' PREFACE Since the inception of the Bulletin of Tibetoiogy. more than a , decade and a half years back. it has been carrying on its eventful existence as one of the leading Journals on Tibetology and Buddhism. It covers a wide range of subjects dealing with Tibetology, Central Asian and Indological Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Tricky Representations: Buddhism in the Cinema During Socialism in Mongolia
    Tricky Representations: Buddhism in the Cinema during Socialism in Mongolia Manduhai Buyandelger Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Mass. (USA) The socialist state regarded religion as an venues. The idea that all societies go through obstacle to modernization and an opiate of the the same stages of development once masses. From late 1937 through early 1939, propagated by the European enlightenment Mongolia eliminated religion along with the theorists was reinforced in Mongolia as a part intelligentsia, the upper classes, and political of socialist revolution in the 1921 and leaders. In the span of about 18 months, 800 subsequent nation-building processes. Buddhist temple compounds (5,953 buildings) Ideologically, religion was seen as a remnant became ash heaps [Fig. 1]. Of 85,000 lamas, of the past and primitive superstition that 20,356 were killed and the rest were jailed, impeded modernization and progress. In order sent to labor camps, or forced to adopt lay to succeed the socialist state needed devoted professions. By 1939 there were no official and dutiful followers who believed in the categories of religious practitioners registered ideology of socialism and nothing else. The state in the census, and Mongolia became a classless sanctioned mass media and art to shape and atheistic society (Baabar 1996). people’s minds, to produce culture that would transform the populace from devoted Buddhist to atheist citizens of a modernizing socialist country. Yet the making of anti-religious propaganda films was a complex task and required an immense creativity on the side of the filmmakers. That is because Buddhism was not just a spiritual domain, but a complex cultural mechanism through which people made sense of their daily lives, maintained family memory, and constituted a core of individual and national identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 -: 52
    CHAPTER 3 -: 52 :- CHAPTER.-3 SPREAD OF BUDDHISM TO TIBET AND SIKKIM SEC'!' ION-I JOURNEY OF BUDDHISI-1 TO TIBET 3.1 e 1 • The Period of Introduction First Acquaintance with Buddhism It is interesting to note that Tibet, the propagator of Lamaist polity, vas completely unaware of Buddhism till the beginning of the seventh century. One of the reasons for this might be the natural barrier of the great Himalayas which kept 'l'ibet isolated from the rest of the world. The introduction of Buddhism into Tibet took place around the second quarter of the seventh century A.D., during the reign of King Sron-btsan-sgam-po (A.D. 629-50), the greatest 1 ruler of Tibet in ancient times. • It is said t.hat King Sron-btsan- sgam-po married two princesses from China and Nepal, both of whom were Buddhists and drew their husband towards Buddhism. Both these countries (China and Nepal) ~ere the g~eat centres of Buddhism in that time, and thus great influence was brought. to bear for the 2 propagation of Buddhism i.n Tibet by those two queens • According to Ti9etan chronicles, there was no written language or alphabets upto his time. King Sron-btf.an-sga.m-po, realizing the ,.· necessi-~y of the written language, sent his Minister Thom-mi-sam-bhota with some companions to Kashi (Benaras) in India to study Sanskrit and -: 53 :- 3 also the sacred literatures of Indian Buddhism • Thon-mi-sam-bhota. adopted Indian alphabet with some modifications and framed the two- . h 4 fold system of T1beta.n scr1pts, v:LZ., 'U-med' and 'U-c en' • It is presum·ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of Tibetology
    BVLL£T1N OF T1B£TOLO(;V Sikkim Research Institute of Tibetology Gangtok, Sikkim India EDITORIAL BOARD Chief f:ditor : Tashi Tobdcn I.A.S MClnber Shri Bahjagovinda Ghosh. Member Acharya Samtcn Gyalso < Member Dr. Rigzin Ngodup Dokhampa Member Dr Sunam Gyatso Tenzing Vicws expresscd in the Bullctm ofTibetology are those of the contributors and not of the Sikkim Research Institute of Tibetology. An article represents the pm/ate indi­ vidual views onhe author Md dges not reflect those' of any offi~c or institution with which the author may be associated. The editors are the publishers of the article (s); copyright of an article belongs to the author, unless otherwise indicated . ..' Bulletin of Tibetology DVLL£T1N OF T1D£TOLOGV ,. Seminar Volume 1995 Sikkim Research Institute of Tibetology Gangtok, Sikkim India Bulletin of Tibetology '/ ... GlJRlJ }>ADlVIASA!VIBHAVt\ Bulletin of Tibetology NATIONAL SEMINAR (29TH, 30TH MARCH 1995) PART I GURU PADMASAMBHAVA'S CONTRIBIJTION TO SIKKIM PART II CULTURAL ASPECTS OF SIKKIM Published SIKKIM RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TIBETOLOGY GANGTOK, SIKKIM 1995 Pdnted at : Cybcr PRINT & Systems, Old Children Park Taxi Stand, Gangtok. Bulletin of Tibetology Sikkim Research Institute of Tibetology Price per copy Rs. 85.00 Fron-tis-piece Guru Rinpoche Bulletin of Tibetology CONTENTS S. NO. Page I. FOREWORD 2 ReslJme 1. InaugllL11 Address of HF The Governor of Sikkim Shri P Shiv ') .Shankar. Pre~,ident SRIT PART I 4. Guru Padmasambhav<I's cOlllribution to the cSl'lblisilmGlll of Dhanna 15 tradition in Sikkllll Khenpo Deehell DOlJee. Ph D. Principal. SlkkJln fnSIHute of Higher Nyingma StudIes. Gangtok. Guru Padm3sambhava's COlllribution : The GenesIs of Buddhism 19 in Sikkim 13\ Chewang Acharya.
    [Show full text]