DOCSLIB.ORG

(Adr). Done at Geneva, on 30 September 19571

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Adr). Done at Geneva, on 30 September 19571 48 United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1995 ANNEX A — ANNEXE A No. 8940. EUROPEAN AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL CAR- RIAGE OF DANGEROUS GOODS BY ROAD (ADR). DONE AT GENEVA, ON 30 SEPTEMBER 19571 ENTRY INTO FORCE of amendments to annexes A and B, as amended,2 to the above- mentioned Agreement The amendments were proposed by the Government of France and circulated by the Secretary-General to the Contracting Parties on 30 June 1994. They came into force on 1 January 1995, in accordance with article 14 (3) of the Agreement. Authentic texts of the amendments: English and French. Registered ex officio on 1 January 1995. (The authentic French text of the amendments appears in volume 1846— Le texte authentique français des amendements paraît dans le volume 1846.) The text of the amendments reads as follows: 1 United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 619, p. 77; for subsequent actions, see references in Cumulative Indexes Nos. 9 and 11 to 21, as well as annex A in volumes 1259, 1279, 1283, 1297, 1344, 1394, 1395, 1430, 1489, 1505, 1553, 1580, 1663, 1679, 1696, 1701, 1719, 1723, 1724, 1732, 1775, 1777 and 1843. 2 Ibid, vol. 731, p. 3, and annex A in volumes 774, 828, 883, 907, 921, 922, 926, 951, 982, 987, 1003, 1023, 1035, 1074, 1107, 1161, 1162, 1259, 1279, 1283, 1297, 1344, 1395, 1489, 1553, 1663 and 1701. Vol. 1845, A-8940 1995 United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 49 EUROPEAN AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE OF DANGEROUS GOODS BY ROAD (ADR) WITH ANNEXES AND PROTOCOL OF SIGNATURE, DONE AT GENEVA ON 30 SEPTEMBER 1957 Amendments proposed bv the Government of France to Annexes A and B. as amended, to the abovp-mentioned Aareement ANNEX A of ADR TABLE OF CONTENTS PART II. Amend the entry for Class 6.2 to read "Class 6.2 Infectious substances ... 2650 et sea" PART III. Appendix A.I Replace "flammable solids" with "nitrated mixtures of nitrocellulose, self-reactive substances" Appendix A.3 Amend the title A as follows: "A. Tests relating to flammable liquids of Classes 3, 6.1 and 8 (Test for determining flash-point, Test for determining peroxide content, Test for determining combustibility)" Add: "G. Tests for determining the ecotoxicity, persistence and bioaccumulation of substances 1n the aquatic environment for assignment to Class 9." Vol. 1845, A-8940 50 United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1995 Part I. DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS 2002 (1) Delete the following and add it to fourth sentence: "6.2" and "2651". (2) Amend the entry for Class 6.2 to read: "Class 6.2 Infectious substances Non-restrictive" 2002(3)(a) Sixth subparagraph, amend as follows: "the total quantity of dangerous goods (as a volume or as a gross mass or as a net mass and, in addition, in the case of explosive substances and articles of Class 1, as a total net mass of explosive contents). NOTE 1: This information is not required in the case of uncleaned empty packagings, containers or tanks. NOTE 2: In the case of the application of marginal 10 Oil, the quantities of dangerous goods carried per transport unit shall be expressed as a gross mass". (8) 1. Amend (a) to read as follows: (a) A solution or mixture containing a dangerous substance listed by name in ADR together with one or more non-dangerous substances, shall be regarded as the dangerous substance listed by name, unless: 1. The solution or mixture is specifically listed by name elsewhere in ADR; or 2. It is quite clear from the item for the dangerous substance that it is applicable only to the pure or technically pure substance; or 3. The class, physical state or packing group (letter), of the solution or mixture is different from that of the dangerous substance. Vol. 1845, A-8940 1995 United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 51 2002 (8) For such solutions and mixtures, the word "solution" or "mixture" (cont'd) shall then be added as part of the name in the transport document for the purposes of clarity in the description, for example, "acetone solution". If the class, physical state or packing group are different from that for the pure substance, the solution or mixture shall be assigned to an appropriate n.o.s. entry, depending on the degree of danger. 2. Amend (b) 2.1 to read as follows: "2.1 If there is no predominant danger, classification shall be based on the following order of precedence: substances and articles of Class 1 substances and articles of Class 2 self-reactive and related substances and explosive substances in non-explosive state (wetted or phlegmatized explosive substances) of Class 4.1 pyrophoric substances of Class 4.2 substances of Class 5.2 substances of Class 6.1 or Class 3 which, on the basis of their inhalation toxicity, are to be classified under letter (a) of the various items (excluding substances, solutions and mixtures (such as preparations and wastes) meeting the classification criteria of Class 8 and having an inhalation toxicity of dust and mists (LC6O) in the range of group (a) and toxicity through oral ingestion or dermal contact only in the range of group (c) or less; such substances, solutions and mixtures (such as preparations and wastes) shall be assigned to Class 8) infectious substances of Class 6.2." Vol. 1845, A-8940 52 United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1995 2002 (8) (cont'd) (cont'd) 3. Amend 2.3.2 to read as follows: "2.3.2 Classification under an n.o.s. entry or an item of a class determined in accordance with 2.3.1 on the basis of the danger characteristics of the various components of the solution or mixture. Classification under a general n.o.s. entry is permitted only when classification under a specific n.o.s. entry is not possible. NOTE: Examples for the classification of mixtures and solutions under classes and items: A phenol solution of Class 6.1, 14° (b), in benzene of Class 3, 3* (b) is to be classified in Class 3, 3 (b); this solution is to be classified under the entry 1992 flammable liquid, toxic, n.o.s.. Class 3, 19° (b), by virtue of the toxicity of the phenol. A solid mixture of sodium arsenate of Class 6.1, 51* (b) and sodium hydroxide of Class 8, 41° (b), is to be classified under the entry 1557 arsenic compound, solid, n.o.s. in Class 6.1, 51° (b). A solution of crude or refined naphthalene of Class 4.1, 6° (c) in petrol of Class 3, 3* (b), is to be classified under the entry 3295 hydrocarbons, liquid, n.o.s. in Class 3, 3° (b). A mixture' of hydrocarbons of Class 3, 31° (c), and of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) of Class 9, 2° (b), is to be classified under the entry 2315 polvchlorinated biphenvls in Class 9, 2° (b). A mixture of propyleneimine of Class 3, 12°, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) of Class 9, 2° (b), is to be classified under the entry 1921 propvieneimine. inhibited in Class 3, 12°. Vol. 1845, A-8940 1995 United Nations — Treaty Series Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 53 l*(3 I'l c * I'C fi H I' l i fi i»_ l i ~ 2 l t | i 1 3 9 01 9 S 1 9 9 9 e » 1 •"• Ib •s 11 4 4)rl l o Bb I' I'C i'l L'i. I' I'l l l l l n i 5 i l I'l l I' i i 9 9 9 C C S » Ib Ib le til so 4 4 4 SIb G S3 j s .M El 1 l 1 I' I'l i | l i 2 I't l I'l I' 3 l •=• 9 9 C C o 1 g- lb • 0 "~ i . 4 n 1 vi •» ' >n til SÏ 1 M 40! m ! I 1 i 2 « , J i 2T S1 2 w TOS 1 I'C I'l I' t l' l ! ( I 6- 1 I'C m IT | I' , » 3 J5 S •= C S — 4!b 3 | I'C IM9 l | s 3 lb » I' | ( (lb SIb G C m _, M ) 1 CM ) 11 »• 11 9 9 » » II 1 I' J3 M w> 1 ** («1 M ' I' I' 1 l C C ]• 3 9 9 9 en c 9 pi I' o I' i C C n t I'l I'l 10 lo I'C I'C | | | ) | S S s Z* s » ) 3b 1b lc lb solut 4 4 1/1 W» 4 4Ie 4 o I' C n •0 IM 4-1 r TOS ^ ^ in c m ai I'C l | | ai ) in S t u n » lb s? Ib 4 4 43b si SIb to rfi x u 4T 25 S5 • mi lxt ** O — O — •ri I' I' I' I'C a- I'C n C C C 3 3 n ai » » i j c e I'l I' l y tox C C î ti •z 3 tanc lclt lt 1 3 stan ja : O *H 0 i I'C ce I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C n3 ? J-> X » » » » » » » » 0 T lat l i m o I' u a C n «( 10 _i n Der | Sol Inh | Llq Ora = = = = » s = 4Ib V» •* 41c . g 3- 23 ce « -J 0 u c= _,* S O M 0 0 2 ~ | S' 1c « ç-ï- 23 93 1 11 10 1 * III : I I " S » s*- —V.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pesticide Residues in Food 2007 – Report, 2007 (E)
    FAO Pesticide residues PLANT PRODUCTION in food 2007 AND PROTECTION PAPER Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues 191 Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues Geneva, Switzerland, 18–27 September 2007 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2007 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. ISBN 978-92-5-105918-0 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to: Chief Electronic
    [Show full text]
  • Routine Multipesticide Analysis Orbitrap
    Routine Multi-Pesticide Residue Analysis by Orbitrap MS Technology Osama Abu-Nimreh CMD Sales Support Specialist MECEC , Dubai The world leader in serving science Challenges of Pesticide-Residues Analysis • Sample variability (matrix) • Different compound characteristics • Large number of samples • Hundreds of analytes monitored • Low levels controlled • Baby food (MRL for all pesticides = 0.01 mg/kg) • Fast response required 2 Former Pesticide Multi-Residue Method Setup . Extraction Acetonitrile, Ethyl Mostly replaced acetate, Methanol... by QuEChERS today . Clean-up GPC, SPE, LLE, LC . Determination GC, LC, GC-MS, LC-MS, Thermo Scientific™ QuEChERS™ GC-MS/MS, LC-MS/MS... method 3 Simplified Extraction Procedure Applied 10 g of sample is weighed into Quechers extraction tube + 20 mL of water + 10 mL of ACN shaking 10 min Centrifugation 5 min @ 5000 rpm Injection to LC-HRAM 4 Consumables Used Consumables/Chemicals Part Number Acetonitrile A/0638/17 QuEChERS extraction tube, 50 mL, 250 pack 60105-216 QuEChERS pouches, 50 pack 60105-344 Apparatus/Columns Part Number Horizontal shaker 1069-3391 Horizontal shaker plate 1053-0102 Thermo Scientific™ Barnstead™ EASYpure™II water 3125753 Thermo Scientific™ Heraeus™ Fresco™ 17 micro centrifuge 3208590 Thermo Scientific™ Accucore™ aQ column 100x2.1, 2.6 µm 17326-102130 5 Improving QuEChERS Extraction Tips & Tricks: • Dry food (cereals/dried food, < 25 % water content): • Addition of water to enable adequate partitioning and reducing interaction of pesticides with matrix • Food containing fat/wax (avocado/oil): • After extraction step add a freezing out step and transfer supernatant to clean-up tube • More clean-up might be needed of raw extract (PSA+C18) • Food containing complex matrix (tea/spices) • Additional clean-up with GCB might be necessary (potential loss of planar structure pesticides like thiabendazole) • Acidic food (citrus): • Adjust pH (5-5.5) to increase recovery (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport of Dangerous Goods
    ST/SG/AC.10/1/Rev.16 (Vol.I) Recommendations on the TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS Model Regulations Volume I Sixteenth revised edition UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2009 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ST/SG/AC.10/1/Rev.16 (Vol.I) Copyright © United Nations, 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may, for sales purposes, be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the United Nations. UNITED NATIONS Sales No. E.09.VIII.2 ISBN 978-92-1-139136-7 (complete set of two volumes) ISSN 1014-5753 Volumes I and II not to be sold separately FOREWORD The Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods are addressed to governments and to the international organizations concerned with safety in the transport of dangerous goods. The first version, prepared by the United Nations Economic and Social Council's Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, was published in 1956 (ST/ECA/43-E/CN.2/170). In response to developments in technology and the changing needs of users, they have been regularly amended and updated at succeeding sessions of the Committee of Experts pursuant to Resolution 645 G (XXIII) of 26 April 1957 of the Economic and Social Council and subsequent resolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries
    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2015/025175 Al 26 February 2015 (26.02.2015) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/025175 Al 26 February 2015 (26.02.2015) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C09K 5/06 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (21) International Application Number: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, PCT/GB2014/052580 DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, 22 August 2014 (22.08.2014) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, (25) Filing Language: English OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (26) Publication Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, (30) Priority Data: ZW. 13 15098.2 23 August 2013 (23.08.2013) GB (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (71) Applicant: SUNAMP LIMITED [GB/GB]; Unit 1, Satel kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, lite Place, Macmerry, Edinburgh EH33 1RY (GB). GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, (72) Inventors: BISSELL, Andrew John; C/o SunAmp, Unit TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, 1, Satellite Place, Macmerry, Edinburgh EH33 1RY (GB).
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Index of Substances and Articles
    ALPHABETICAL INDEX OF SUBSTANCES AND ARTICLES - 355 - NOTES TO THE INDEX 1. This index is an alphabetical list of the substances and articles which are listed in numerical order in the Dangerous Goods List in Chapter 3.2. 2. For the purpose of determining the alphabetical order the following information has been ignored even when it forms part of the proper shipping name: numbers; Greek letters; the abbreviations “sec” and “tert”; and the letters “N” (nitrogen), “n” (normal), “o” (ortho) “m” (meta), “p” (para) and “N.O.S.” (not otherwise specified). 3. The name of a substance or article in block capital letters indicates a proper shipping name. 4. The name of a substance or article in block capital letters followed by the word “see” indicates an alternative proper shipping name or part of a proper shipping name (except for PCBs). 5. An entry in lower case letters followed by the word “see” indicates that the entry is not a proper shipping name; it is a synonym. 6. Where an entry is partly in block capital letters and partly in lower case letters, the latter part is considered not to be part of the proper shipping name. 7. A proper shipping name may be used in the singular or plural, as appropriate, for the purposes of documentation and package marking. - 356 - INDEX Name and description Class UN No. Name and description Class UN No. Accumulators, electric, see 4.3 3292 Acid mixture, nitrating acid, see 8 1796 8 2794 8 2795 Acid mixture, spent, nitrating acid, see 8 1826 8 2800 8 3028 Acraldehyde, inhibited, see 6.1 1092 ACETAL 3 1088
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Dried Blood Spots for the Determination of Organophosphorus Pesticides by GC-MS/MS
    UNIVERSIDADE DA BEIRA INTERIOR Ciências Application of dried blood spots for the determination of organophosphorus pesticides by GC-MS/MS Sofia Pires Seixo Soares Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Bioquímica (2º ciclo de estudos) Orientador: Doutor Mário Jorge Dinis Barroso Co-orientador: Professora Doutora Maria Eugenia Gallardo Alba Covilhã, junho de 2018 Agradecimentos A realização de uma dissertação de mestrado é o culminar de muitas horas de estudo, reflexão e trabalho pessoal, mas representa também uma etapa que não seria possível sem o contributo fundamental de várias pessoas. À Doutora Eugénia Gallardo e ao Doutor Mário Barroso, como excelentes mentores que são, quero agradecer toda a orientação, motivação, incentivo e confiança. Toda a ajuda e partilha de experiência e conhecimento durante todo este percurso. Ao Tiago Rosado, pela imprescindível ajuda e disponibilidade constante, bem como pela amizade. À Joana Gonçalves e ao Ângelo Luís um agradecimento especial pela amizade e carinho demonstrado ao longo deste ano. A todos, quero agradecer pelo bom ambiente proporcionado. Aos meus pais Ana Soares e José Soares, a quem dedico este feito, por me darem a possibilidade de concretizar conquistas como esta, pelo apoio incondicional, por sempre terem acreditado em mim e por fazerem parte deste momento. Aos meus avós e restante família, por todo o apoio e preocupação. Um agradecimento particular à Inês Ramos, à Rita Marques, à Maria Cunha e ao Pedro Batista pelo companheirismo, amizade e apoio de há tantos anos. E por último, mas nunca menos importante, um enorme obrigada ao meu namorado António Fernandes por toda a paciência, pelo incansável apoio, carinho e ajuda.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Residue Analysis of 210 Pesticides in Food Samples by Triple Quadrupole UHPLC-MS/MS
    Multi-Residue Analysis of 210 Pesticides in Food Samples by Triple Quadrupole UHPLC-MS/MS David R. Baker1, Chris Titman1, Alan J. Barnes1, Neil J. Loftus1, Alexander Mastoroudes2, Simon Hird3 1Shimadzu Corporation, Manchester, UK 2Kings College London, London, UK 3Food and Environment Research Agency, York, UK Abstract Pesticides and their metabolites are of great concern to society as they are harmful to human health, pollute natural resources and disturb the equilibrium of the ecosystem. Consequently, stricter food safety regulations are being enforced around the world, placing pesticide analysis laboratories under increasing pressure to expand the list of targeted pesticides, detect analytes at lower levels and with greater precision, reduce analysis turnaround times, and all the while maintaining or reducing costs. In this study a method was successfully developed for the quantitation of 210 commonly analysed pesticides in food samples using the Nexera UHPLC and LCMS-8040. Initial validation was performed to demonstrate instrument capabilities. Limits of detection (LOD) for 90 % of compounds were less than 0.001 mg kg-1 (1 ppb) and all compounds were less than 0.01 mg kg-1 (10 ppb) for both the quantifying and qualifying transitions using only a 2 µL injection. Repeatability at the 0.01 mg kg-1 reporting level was typically less than 5 %RSD for compounds and correlation coefficients were typically greater than 0.997 in a variety of studied food extracts. Consequently, the LCMS-8040 is ideally suited for routine monitoring of pesticides below the 0.01 mg kg-1 default level set by EU and Japanese legislation. Keywords: Pesticides; Multi-residue analysis; LCMS-8040; Food safety; Fruit; Vegetables 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,528,079 B2 Podszun Et Al
    US006528079B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,528,079 B2 PodsZun et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Mar. 4, 2003 (54) SHAPED BODIES WHICH RELEASE 4,845,106 A 7/1989 Shiokawa et al. .......... 514/342 AGROCHEMICALACTIVE SUBSTANCES 4,849,432 A 7/1989 Shiokawa et al. .......... 514/341 4.882,344 A 11/1989 Shiokawa et al. .......... 514/342 (75) Inventors: Wolfgang Podszun, Köln (DE); Uwe 4.914,113 A 4/1990 Shiokawa et al. .......... 514/333 Priesnitz, Solingen (DE); Jirgen 4,918,086 A 4/1990 Gsell .......................... 514/351 4,918,088 A 4/1990 Gsell .......................... 514/357 Hölters, Leverkusen (DE); Bodo 4.948.798.2- Y - A 8/1990 Gsell .......................... 514/275 Rehbold, Köln (DE); Rafel Israels, 4,963,572 A 10/1990 Gsell .......................... 514/357 Monheim (DE) 4,963,574. A 10/1990 Bachmann et al. ......... 514/357 4,988,712 A 1/1991 Shiokawa et al. .......... 514/340 (73) Assignee: Bayer Aktiengesellschaft, Leverkusen 5,001,138 A 3/1991 Shiokawa et al. .......... 514/342 (DE) 5,034.404 A 7/1991. Uneme et al. .............. 514/365 5,034,524 A 7/1991 Shiokawa et al. .......... 544/124 (*) Notice: This patent issued on a continued pros- 5,039,686 A 8/1991 Davies et al. ............... 514/341 ecution application filed under 37 CFR 5,049,571. A 9/1991 Gsell .......................... 514/345 1.53(d), and is subject to the twenty year SE A :1: S. - - - - - - - -tal.5 E.s pass" provisions of 35 U.S.C. 5,166,1642Y- - - 2 A 11/1992 NanjoOKaWa et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 4050 Safety Wash
    4050 Safety Wash MG Chemicals UK Limited Version No: A-2.00 Issue Date: 26/03/2019 Safety data sheet according to REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, as amended by UK REACH Regulations SI 2019/758 Revision Date: 22/04/2021 L.REACH.GB.EN SECTION 1 Identification of the substance / mixture and of the company / undertaking 1.1. Product Identifier Product name 4050 Synonyms SDS Code: 4050-Liquid; 4050-1L, 4050-4L, 4050-20L | UFI: 58R0-10PR-8006-PNCW Other means of identification Safety Wash for Electronics 1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Relevant identified uses Cleaner for electronics that is safe for plastics Uses advised against Not Applicable 1.3. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Registered company name MG Chemicals UK Limited MG Chemicals (Head office) Heame House, 23 Bilston Street, Sedgely Dudley DY3 1JA United Address 9347 - 193 Street Surrey V4N 4E7 British Columbia Canada Kingdom Telephone +(44) 1663 362888 +(1) 800-201-8822 Fax Not Available +(1) 800-708-9888 Website Not Available www.mgchemicals.com Email [email protected] [email protected] 1.4. Emergency telephone number Association / Organisation Verisk 3E (Access code: 335388) Emergency telephone +(44) 20 35147487 numbers Other emergency telephone +(0) 800 680 0425 numbers SECTION 2 Hazards identification 2.1. Classification of the substance or mixture Classification according to regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 H225 - Flammable Liquid Category 2, H319 - Eye Irritation Category 2 [CLP] and amendments [1] Legend: 1. Classified by Chemwatch; 2. Classification drawn from Regulation (EU) No 1272/2008 - Annex VI 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Formula of Binary Ionic Compounds – Sheet 1 the Combining Power Or Valency of Silver Is Always 1
    Chemical Formula of Binary Ionic Compounds – Sheet 1 The combining power or valency of silver is always 1. All other transition metals are 2 unless otherwise indicated. No. Binary compound Formula No. Binary compound Formula 1 potassium fluoride 26 calcium sulfide 2 calcium chloride 27 lithium bromide 3 barium bromide 28 nickel sulfide 4 silver sulfide 29 zinc phosphide 5 aluminium iodide 30 barium iodide 6 potassium iodide 31 caesium chloride 7 lead(IV) oxide 32 copper bromide 8 zinc nitride 33 sodium nitride 9 silver iodide 34 silver chloride 10 barium fluoride 35 sodium hydride 11 lead(II) iodide 36 potassium nitride 12 silver fluoride 37 cobalt chloride 13 sodium sulfide 38 magnesium sulfide 14 sodium bromide 39 potassium chloride 15 calcium oxide 40 calcium bromide 16 zinc fluoride 41 iron(III) oxide 17 strontium phosphide 42 aluminium fluoride 18 barium sulfide 43 magnesium bromide 19 aluminium oxide 44 iron(III) chloride 20 aluminium chloride 45 barium nitride 21 aluminium sulfide 46 sodium fluoride 22 lead(II) oxide 47 lithium fluoride 23 barium chloride 48 lithium iodide 24 copper chloride 49 lithium hydride 25 barium phosphide 50 potassium oxide “Aluminum” and “cesium” are commonly used alternative spellings for "aluminium" and "caesium that are used in the US. May be freely copied for educational use. ©www.chemicalformula.org Chemical Formula of Binary Ionic Compounds – Sheet 2 The combining power or valency of silver is always 1. All other transition metals are 2 unless otherwise indicated. No. Binary compound Formula No.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Butocarboxim Residue in Agricultural Products by HPLC with Post-Column Derivatization System
    Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 1999. 7(4) : 269-277 Determination of Butocarboxim Residue in Agricultural Products by HPLC with Post-Column Derivatization System SU-HSIANG TSENG*, PI-CHIOU CHANG AND SHIN-SHOU CHOU A method using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for the determination of butocarboxim in agricultural products was developed. Butocarboxim was extracted from samples with acetone and the extract solution was concentrated. The residue was dissolved in sodium chloride solution and partitioned with n-hexane. The aqueous phase was collected fol- lowed by extracted with dichloromethane, which was then evaporated to a volume of 2 mL prior to passing through an aminopropyl cartridge for sample clean-up. Determination of butocarboxim residue in crops was carried out by HPLC equipped with a post-column deriva- tization system and a fluorescence detector. HPLC separation was performed on a Lichrospher 60 RP-Select B column eluted with a mobile phase of acetonitrile-water (25:75, v/v). Butocarboxim was hydrolyzed at 90°C under alkaline conditions and subsequently react- ed with o-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) / 2-mercaptoethanol reagent via a post-column reactor to generate a fluorophore, which was then detected with a fluorescence detector at Ex 340 nm and Em 455 nm. Average recoveries from radishes and bamboo sprouts, which were spiked with 0.1~0.3 and 0.2 ppm butocarboxim, respectively, were in the range of 81.9~82.6%. The detection limit was 0.05 ppm. No butocarboxim residue was detected in 10 commercial prod- ucts including radishes, carrots, and bamboo sprouts. Key words: agricultural products, butocarboxim, aminopropyl cartridge, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), post-column derivatization system, fluorescence detection.
    [Show full text]