DOCSLIB.ORG

© in This Web Service Cambridge University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
© in This Web Service Cambridge University Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03512-6 - Operation Typhoon: Hitler’s March on Moscow, October 1941 David Stahel Index More information INDEX Afrikakorps 308 losses 26, 294 Air Fleet 245, 60, 96, 183, 206, 222–224 Operation Barbarossa 32 II Air Corps 61, 206 Fourth Panzer 73 VIII Air Corps 61, 131, 149, 165, 206 Sixth 8, 32, 49, 76, 121, 256 Air Fleet 460 Ninth Aktion T4 programme 264 deployment 62, 73, 131, 179, 182, Aleksin 304 276 Alexander I, tsar 3, 239 horses 194 Anatolia 52 Kalinin 184–189, 252–254, 287–289 Antonescu, Ion 109, 198, 278–279 losses 26 Archangel 233–234 Operation Barbarossa 32, 84 Armies (British) Viaz’ma encirclement 146 Eighth 308 Eleventh 32, 301 Armies (German) Sixteenth 32 First Panzer 76, 198, 230 Seventeenth 32–33, 84, 277, 280 Second Eighteenth 32 Briansk encirclement 77, 87, 118, 159 Armies (Romanian) deployment 62, 76, 260 Third 32, 279 drive on Moscow 177 Fourth 32, 278 Second Panzer Armies (Soviet) Briansk encirclement 119, 159–160 Third 77, 118–119 deployment 179, 182 Fifth 139, 218–219 drive on Tula 241, 257–261, 283 Ninth 198, 301 establishment 76 Thirteenth 77, 87, 119 logistics 95–97, 123, 126, 195–196 Sixteenth 78, 139, 156, 218 Mtsensk 189–192 Eighteenth 198, 301 Fourth Nineteenth 78, 156 deployment 62, 276 Twentieth 62, 78, 153, 156 drive on Moscow 165, 173–174, Twenty-Second 140, 161, 183 177–179, 241–246, 260–261, Twenty-Fourth 62, 78, 153, 156 282–285 Twenty-Ninth 140, 161, 183 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03512-6 - Operation Typhoon: Hitler’s March on Moscow, October 1941 David Stahel Index More information 401 / Index Thirtieth 140, 183 Bagration, Petr 13 Thirty-Second 78, 153, 156 Baltic Sea 33, 49 Thirty-Third 161, 219 Bär, Heinz 61 Forty-Third 62, 139, 218–219 Barbarossa, Operation 1, 16, 32–33, Forty-Ninth 139, 218 272, 290 Fiftieth 77, 118–119, 158–159, 258 Barclay de Tolly, Andreas 13–14 Coastal Army 198 Barents Sea 32, 235 Army Group Centre Baromykin, Boris 244 BBC radio 238 Bätcher, Hans-Georg 223 Briansk encirclement 119, 157–162 Battleaxe, Operation 237 drive on Moscow 173–179, 239–246 Becker, Hans 171 foreign armies 275–278 Belarus (Belorussia) 8, 70, 272 Grosstransportraum 20, 35, 92, Belgium 278 187–188, 250, 257 Below, Nicolaus von 100 horses 193–195 Belyasnik, Petr 236 logistics 187–189, 195–196 Beria, L. P. 69–70, 216 morale 206–208 Berlin 6, 57–58, 105, 200, 225–226 objectives 76, 191 Bessarabia 70, 277–278 Operation Barbarossa 32, 40–41 Bezhetsk 253–255, 259–260 operational problems 25–26, Bidermann, Gottlob 131, 154, 169, 35–39, 92–94, 290–291, 207–208, 228, 248 303–304 Bismarck, Georg von 55 optimism 111–112 Bittrich, Wilhelm 176 orders 131 Black Sea 32–33, 49, 278 partisans 122–124, 293 Black Sea Fleet 198 railways 20–21, 92 Bletchley Park 273 reinforcement for Typhoon 2, Blue, Operation 256 43–45 Blumentritt, Günther sickness/losses 192–193, 246–249, drive on Moscow 165, 240 262–266, 268–270 Operation Barbarossa 26–27 Viaz’ma encirclement 71, 88–89, post-war correspondence 306 150–151, 153–154 propaganda 105, 287, 304 weather problems 166–172 strategic thinking 90, 97, 111, 150 Army Group North 8, 32, 64, 275 Bock, Fedor von 1 treatment of Jews 170 Briansk encirclement 88–89, 158–159 in Typhoon planning 81 impact of weather 81, 239–241 Army Group South 8, 32, 49, Kalinin 184–185, 188, 252–254 256, 301 new operations 259–262, 287–289 Axis formations within 278–281 October operations 298–300 disputes within 84 optimism for Typhoon 21, 56–57, Reichenau’s order 121 294–296 Army Group Vistula 374 planning for Typhoon 49–50 Arnim, Hans-Jürgen von 76 relationship with commanders 71–76, 84 Auchinleck, Claude 308, 361 Soviet POWs 162 Auleb, Helge 94 Spanish Blue Division 275–276 Austerlitz, battle of 13 strategic thinking 81, 120, 127, 165, Austria 12 179, 182, 196, 282–283, 290–291 Avdotnya 267 Viaz’ma encirclement 78–80, 89–92, Azov, battle of Sea of 301 115–116, 118, 143, 150–151 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03512-6 - Operation Typhoon: Hitler’s March on Moscow, October 1941 David Stahel Index More information 402 / Index Bogolyubskaya, Irina 216 Caulaincourt, Armand de 27–28, 83 Bolshoi Theatre 216, 224 Cavallero, Ugo 279 Bomber Command 200 Central Asia 5 Bonaparte, Napoleon 3, 13–15, 19, 27, Chales de Beaulieu, Walter 43, 176 83, 97–98, 142, 176–177, 239, Charles XII, King 11–12, 15, 269, 297 27, 297 Borodino, battle of 14, 176 Cherevichenko, I. T. 198 Brauchitsch, Walter von 64 Chern 257 logistics 197 China 271 Luftwaffe losses 225 Churchill, Winston 99, 156, 232–237, new operations 259–262 308, 361 OKH directives 81, 230 Ciano, Galeazzo 58, 99, 102, 181–182, strategic thinking 49, 111, 179, 199, 279 239–240, 253 Ciuperca, Nicolae 32 Braun, H. E. 144–145 Clausen, battle of 11–12 Breith, Hermann 189 Clausewitz, Carl von 9–10, 15, 19, 30, Bremen 201 150, 198, 258 Brest fortress 33, 216 Clössner, Heinrich 87 Brest(-Litovsk) 205, 352 Cochenhausen, Conrad von 159 Brest-Litovsk, Treaty of 69 Cologne 200 Briansk 49, 62, 73, 195–197, 212, Conrad III, king 52 258, 293 Constantinople 52 Briansk, battle of 2, 305 corps (German army) encirclement 76–78, 86–88 II 267 fighting to escape pocket 118–120, V 146, 282 157–162 VI 253 Britain 3, 31, 107, 156, 204, 224, 233, VIII 146 236–238 IX 58, 153, 195 Britain, battle of 235 XII 177, 245 Brockdorff-Ahlefeldt, Walter Graf von XIII 177, 245 266 XX 246 Bruch, Gerhard von 250, 286 XXIII 253 Bucharest 199, 222, 278 XXXIV 76, 192, 260 Budak, Mile 53 XXXV 76, 86–87, 192, 260 Budenny, S. M. 45 XXXXIII 36, 86, 193, 257 Bug, River 205 LIII 119, 193–194 Bukovina 70 corps (Hungarian) Bumke, Ludwig 166 Mobile Corps 279–280 Busch, Ernst 32 corps (Italian) CSIR (Italian Expeditionary Corps in Canaris, Wilhelm 270 Russia) 33, 279, 371 Carpathian Group 33 Crimea 16, 198, 214, 237, 290 Case Blue 1 Cripps, Stafford 140, 233, 237 Case Yellow 1 Croatian Air Force Legion (Hrvatska Cassidy, Henry 5, 223 Zrakoplovna Legija) 61 Catherine II, tsarina 13 Croatian Infantry Regiment 277 Catloš, Ferdinand 33 Crusader, Operation 237, 309 Caucasus 112, 245 Czechoslovakia 201 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03512-6 - Operation Typhoon: Hitler’s March on Moscow, October 1941 David Stahel Index More information 403 / Index Deck, Josef 162 ‘Grossdeutschland’ (Infantry Regiment) Degrelle, Léon 97, 165, 206, 370 118, 158 Denisova, Maria 148, 152 ‘Polizei’ 229 Denmark 278 ‘Das Reich’ 37, 173–177, 243–245, Desna River 45, 49, 77 247, 262 Detschino 178 ‘Wiking’ 33, 277 Dietrich, Otto 100–101, 105–106, divisions (Slovakian) 165–166, 181, 304 Mobile Division 280–281 divisions (German) divisions (Soviet) 176 1st (Cavalry) 80, 87, 194, 206, 275 3rd Communist Division 218 3rd (Motorised) 125 17th Rifle Division 215 6th (Infantry) 94, 103, 130, 269 107th Motorised Rifle Division 128 7th (Infantry) 276 divisions (Spanish) 8th (Infantry) 206 250th (Infantry) 275 10th (Motorised) 87, 119 Dmitriev 82 15th (Infantry) 246–247 Dmitriev-Lgovskiy 191 23rd (Infantry) 114, 282 Dmitrovsk 60 25th (Motorised) 80, 87, 103, 119–120, Dnepr River 16, 32, 56, 62, 115, 278 203 Dnepropetrovsk 133, 184, 216 28th (Infantry) 206 Don Basin 86, 108 29th (Motorised) 87, 119–120, 158 Dorokhovo 151, 304 30th (Infantry) 195 Dose, Wolf 54 35th (Infantry) 60, 146 Dukhovshchina 49 36th (Motorised) 130, 183–184, 188, Dukhovshchina offensive 300 252, 255, 288 Dumitrescu, Petre 32 46th (Infantry) 262 Dunkirk 156 52nd (Infantry) 118, 159 Dvina River 32 56th (Infantry) 194 58th (Infantry) 54 East Prussia 12 79th (Infantry) 50 Eberbach, Heinrich 126, 257–258 86th (Infantry) 73, 289 Eden, Anthony 237 87th (Infantry) 115 Efferbergen, Hans 193 98th (Infantry) 178, 239, 246, 263 Efremov, M. G. 219 112th (Infantry) 118 Egypt 112 129th (Infantry) 252, 255, 288–289 Ehrenburg, Ilya 220 131th (Infantry) 57 Elizabeth, empress 83 134th (Infantry) 159 Eremenko, A. I. 45, 58, 77, 87, 119–120, 137th (Infantry) 26 158 161st (Infantry) 89, 287 Erfurth, Waldemar 26 162nd (Infantry) 289 Ershakov, A. N. 153 163rd (Infantry) 201 Esebeck, Hans-Karl Freiherr von 95 167th (Infantry) 118 252nd (Infantry) 117 Far East 5 263rd (Infantry) 26 Fausten, Heinz Otto 55, 131 267th (Infantry) 114 Fehn, Gustav 18, 68 268th (Infantry) 282 Felber, Hans-Gustav 177 293rd (Infantry) 87, 119 Feldt, Kurt 194 707th (Infantry) 123 Filaret, Patriarch 10 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03512-6 - Operation Typhoon: Hitler’s March on Moscow, October 1941 David Stahel Index More information 404 / Index Fili 212 Grossman, Vasily 59, 62, 76, 81, 220 Finland 168, 236, 271, 278, 281 Guderian, Heinz 18 First Protocol 233, 237 Briansk pocket 86–88, 119–120, Fischer, Wolfgang 78 158–160 Foreign Armies East 271–272 drive on Tula 257–262 Foreign Armies West 271 logistics 195 Förster, Otto-Wilhelm 253 operational problems 61, 64–65, 126 Four-Year Plan Organisation 108 planning for Typhoon 49–50 Fourth Crusade 53 relations with fellow commanders France 13, 22, 199, 205–206, 276–277 73, 285 Franco, Francisco 102 strategic thinking 27, 67, 82, 190–191, Franco-Prussian War (1870–1871) 104 241, 367 Frederick I, Kaiser 30, 52–53 weather affecting operations 80, legend of Barbarossa 30–31 169–170 Frederick II, king 13 Guicking, Ernst 51, 118, 159, 193, Fremerey, Max 87 205, 231 Friedland, battle of 13 Günther, Helmut 205, 262, 268 Frisch, Franz 92, 97 Gzhatsk 174 Fritzsche, Hans
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Honors for Coach K
    WESOŁEGO ALLELUJA OR WESOŁYCH ŚWIĄT WIELKANOCNYCH?POLISH AMERICAN — JOURNAL PAGE 6 • MARCH 2015 www.polamjournal.com 1 POLISH AMERICAN YORK NEW BOSTON, AT PAID PERIODICAL POSTAGE AND ADDITIONAL ENTRY OFFICES AND ADDITIONAL ENTRY DEDICATED TO THE PROMOTION AND CONTINUANCE OF POLISH AMERICAN CULTURE JOURNAL IT FIGURES: GORTAT MAKES THE BIG TIME ESTABLISHED 1911 MARCH 2015 • VOL. 104, NO. 3 | $2.00 www.polamjournal.com PAGE 10 HOLOCAUST MUSEUM SHOWS BIAS • IT’S 1K FOR COACH K • DOBA IS NG’S “ADVENTURER OF THE YEAR” POLISH FRANCISCANS TO BE BEATIFIED • TRELIŃSKI DEBUTS AT THE MET • HISTORIC SLONIM TAPESTRIES RETURNED STUDY IN POLAND THIS SUMMER! • TO DANCE AGAIN WITH PANI ADA • OLD POLISH LENTEN FARE NEWSMARK Royal Ride Brzezinski: US PHOTO: ANDY GOLEBIOWSKI Should Deploy POLAND, RUSSIA CLASH OVER ANNIVERSARY. (NEWS.PL) — Russia has slammed Polish foreign minis- Troops to Baltics ter Grzegorz Schetyna over his support for Poland’s plans WASHINGTON — The to host V-E Day tributes in Gdańsk that would clash with United States and its allies Moscow’s own event. should deploy troops to Bal- “This is the newest in a line of clumsy attempts by the tic states to deter Russia from Polish politician to cast doubt upon the results of World staging a PHOTO: MSNBC War II, and the role of the Soviet Union as the winner in possible that war,” said Russia’s deputy foreign minister Grigory incursion Karasin. in those Schetyna said in an interview with Poland’s RMF countries, FM that President Bronisław Komorowski’s recently an- f o r m e r nounced proposal to host EU leaders in Gdańsk on May 8, p r e s i - seventy years after the end of World War II, is “an interest- d e n t i a l ing idea.” national Schetyna sparked Russian ire in the lead-up to the 70th security adviser, Zbigniew anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi German death Brzezinski, told lawmakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western Or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 78 | Number 78 Article 5 4-2018 Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Murzionak, Piotra (2018) "Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization?," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 78 : No. 78 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol78/iss78/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Murzionak: Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or t Comparative Civilizations Review 41 Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak Abstract The aim of this article is to further develop the idea of the existence of a distinct Belarusian-Ukrainian/Western-Ruthenian civilization, to define its place among Western sub-civilizations, as well as to argue against the designation of Belarus and Ukraine as belonging to the Eurasian civilization. Most of the provided evidence will be related to Belarus; however, it also applies to Ukraine, the country that has had much in common with Belarus in its historical and cultural inheritance since the 9th and 10th centuries. Key words: designation, Belarus, Europe, civilization Introduction The designation of a modern country or group of countries to one or another civilization bears two aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Politics of Hungary and Romania Between 1940 and 1944
    ACTA UNIV. SAPIENTIAE, EUROPEAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 16 (2019) 59–74 DOI: 10 .2478/auseur-2019-0012 Minority Politics of Hungary and Romania between 1940 and 1944. The System of Reciprocity and Its Consequences1 János Kristóf MURÁDIN PhD, Assistant Professor Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) Faculty of Sciences and Arts e-mail: muradinjanos@sapientia .ro Abstract . The main objective of the paper is to highlight the changes in the situation of the Hungarian minority in Romania and the Romanian minority in Hungary living in the divided Transylvania from the Second Vienna Arbitration from 30 August 1940 to the end of WWII . The author analyses the Hungarian and Romanian governments’ attitude regarding the new borders and their intentions with the minorities remaining on their territories . The paper offers a synthesis of the system of reciprocity, which determined the relations between the two states on the minority issue until 1944. Finally, the negative influence of the politics of reciprocity is shown on the interethnic relations in Transylvania . Keywords: Transylvania, Second Vienna Arbitration, border, minorities, politics of reciprocity, refugees Introduction According to the Second Vienna Arbitration of 30 August 1940, the northern part of Transylvania, the Szeklerland, and the Máramaros (in Romanian: Maramureş, in German: Maramuresch) region, which had been awarded to Romania twenty years earlier, were returned to Hungary (L . Balogh 2002: 5) . According to the 1941 census, the population of a total of 43,104 km2 of land under Hungarian jurisdiction (Thrirring 1940: 663) was 2,557,260, of whom 53 .6% were Hungarian and 39 .9% were Romanian speakers .
    [Show full text]
  • GRAY-DISSERTATION-2018.Pdf (997.1Kb)
    Copyright by Travis Michael Gray 2018 The Dissertation Committee for Travis Michael Gray Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Dissertation: Amid the Ruins: The Reconstruction of Smolensk Oblast, 1943-1953 Committee: Charters Wynn, Supervisor Joan Neuberger Mary Neuburger Thomas Garza Amid the Ruins: The Reconstruction of Smolensk Oblast, 1943-1953 by Travis Michael Gray Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2018 Dedication Dedicated to my mother, father, and brother for their unending love and support.. Acknowledgements The following work could not have been possible without the help of many people. I am especially thankful to Dr. Charters Wynn for his valuable feedback, suggestions, and guidance throughout this process. I would also like to thank Dr. Joan Neuberger, Dr. Mary Neuburger, and Dr. Thomas Garza for reading and commenting on my work. My appreciation also goes to my friends and colleagues at the University of Texas who offered their suggestions and support. v Abstract Amid the Ruins: The Reconstruction of Smolensk Oblast, 1943-1953 Travis Michal Gray, PhD The University of Texas at Austin, 2018 Supervisor: Charters Wynn The first Red Army soldiers that entered Smolensk in the fall of 1943 were met with a bleak landscape. The town was now an empty shell and the countryside a vast wasteland. The survivors emerged from their cellars and huts on the verge of starvation. Amidst the destruction, Party officials were tasked with picking up the pieces and rebuilding the region’s political, economic, and social foundations.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500-1700
    Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700 In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Muscovy waged a costly struggle against the Crimean Khanate, the Ottoman Empire, and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth for control of the fertile steppe above the Black Sea. This was a region of great strategic and economic importance – arguably the pivot of Eurasia at the time. Yet, this crucial period in Russia’s history has, up until now, been neglected by historians. Brian L. Davies’s study provides an essential insight into the emergence of Russia as a great power. The long campaign took a great toll upon Russia’s population, economy, and institutions, and repeatedly frustrated or redefi ned Russian military and diplo- matic projects in the West. The struggle was every bit as important as Russia’s wars in northern and central Europe for driving the Russian state-building process, forcing military reform and shaping Russia’s visions of Empire. Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700 examines the course of this struggle and explains how Russia’s ultimate prevalence resulted from new strategies of military colonization in addition to improvements in army command-and-control, logistics, and tactics. Brian L. Davies is Associate Professor of History at the University of Texas at San Antonio. His publications include State Power and Community in Early Modern Russia: The Case of Kozlov, 1635–1649 (2004). Warfare and History General Editor Jeremy Black Professor of History, University of Exeter Air Power in the Age of Total War Modern Chinese Warfare, Warfare in Atlantic Africa, 1500– John Buckley 1795–1989 1800: Maritime Confl icts and the Bruce A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary at Crossroads: War, Peace, and Occupation Politics (1918-1946)
    HUNGARY AT CROSSROADS: WAR, PEACE, AND OCCUPATION POLITICS (1918-1946) The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by IŞIL TİPİOĞLU In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA July 2019 ABSTRACT HUNGARY AT CROSSROADS: WAR, PEACE, AND OCCUPATION POLITICS (1918-1946) Tipioğlu, Işıl M.A., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hakan Kırımlı July, 2019 This thesis traces the steps of the Hungarian foreign policy from 1918 to 1946, and analyzes the impact of revisionism after the Treaty of Trianon on Hungarian foreign policy decisions and calculations after the First World War. Placing the Hungarian revisionism at its center, this thesis shows the different situation Hungary had as a South European power as an ally of Germany throughout the Second World War and subsequently under the Soviet occupation. It also argues that it was the interlinked Hungarian foreign policy steps well before 1941, the official Hungarian participation in the war, which made Hungary a belligerent country. Also, based largely on the American archival documents, this study places Hungary into a retrospective framework of the immediate post-war era in Europe, where the strong adherence to Nazi Germany and the Hungarian revisionism shaped the future of the country. Key Words: European Politics, Hungary, Revisionism, the Second World War, Twentieth Century iii ÖZET YOL AYRIMINDA MACARİSTAN: SAVAŞ, BARIŞ VE İŞGAL POLİTİKALARI (1918-1946) Tipioğlu, Işıl Yüksek Lisans, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Tez Danışmanı: Doç. Dr. Hakan Kırımlı Temmuz, 2019 Bu tez, 1918’den 1946’ya kadar olan Macar dış politikası adımlarını takip ederek Trianon Antlaşması’ndan sonra ortaya çıkan Macar revizyonizminin, Macar dış politika kararlarında ve hesaplamalarındaki etkisini analiz etmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Military Mission to Romania, 1940-1941 by Richard L. Dinardo
    The German Military Mission to Romania, 1940–1941 By RICHARD L. Di NARDO hen one thinks of security assistance and the train- ing of foreign troops, W Adolf Hitler’s Germany is not a country that typically comes to mind. Yet there were two instances in World War II when Germany did indeed deploy troops to other countries that were in noncombat cir- cumstances. The countries in question were Finland and Romania, and the German mili- tary mission to Romania is the subject of this article. The activities of the German mission to Romania are discussed and analyzed, and some conclusions and hopefully a few take- aways are offered that could be relevant for military professionals today. Creation of the Mission The matter of how the German military mission to Romania came into being can be covered relatively quickly. In late June 1940, the Soviet Union demanded from Romania the cession of both Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina. The only advice Germany could give to the Romanian government was to agree to surrender the territory.1 Fearful of further Soviet encroachments, the Roma- nian government made a series of pleas to Germany including a personal appeal from Wikimedia Commons King Carol II to Hitler for German military assistance in the summer of 1940. Hitler, Finnish Volunteer Battalion of German Waffen-SS return home from front in 1943 however, was not yet willing to undertake such a step. Thus, all Romanian requests were rebuffed with Hitler telling Carol that Romania brought its own problems upon itself by its prior pro-Allied policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian-Romanian Relations: Assessing Prospects for Cooperation and Conflict
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1994-12 Hungarian-Romanian relations: assessing prospects for cooperation and conflict Rodgers, Joel E. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/42858 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA f)FrfiC ELECTEt MAY 0 2 1995 F THESIS HUNGARIAN-ROMANIAN RELATIONS: ASSESSING PROSPECTS FOR COOPERATION AND CONFLICT By Joel E. Rodgers December 1994 Thesis Advisor: DavidS. Yost Approv.ed for public release; distribution is unlimited. 19950501 022 - ----------------------------------- Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704.0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, inducting the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, inducting suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washingon headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Sutte 1204, Ar1ington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704 0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave ,2.REPORT DATE ,3.REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED blank) December 1994 Master's Thesis 4.TITLE AND SUBTITLE HUNGARIAN-ROMANIAN RELATIONS: ASSESSING S.FUNDING NUMBERS PROSPECTS FOR COOPERATION AND CONFLICT 6.AUTHOR(S) Joel E. Rodgers ?.PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) &.PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey CA 93943-5000 9.SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 1 O.SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11.SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler's Policy Towards the Soviet Union January 1933
    HITLER'S POLICY TOWARDS THE SOVIET UNION JANUARY 1933 - JUNE I94I by HARVEY LEONARD DYCK B.A., University of British Columbia, 195?< A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in International Studies We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, 195>8 ABSTRACT Within a year of his accession to power, Hitler, by concluding a non-aggression pact with Poland and by bringing relations with Russia to an impasse, had revolut• ionized German foreign policy. This policy reversal was chosen, primarily, for tactical reasons and only second• arily for ideological reasons. Prom the outset, it is true, relations with Russia were made difficult by Hitler's per• secution of the German Communist Party and by his own hatred for Bolshevism. But it was only after Poland had twice threatened a preventative war against Germany and after Germany had become diplomatically isolated through her desertion of the League of Nations, that Hitler decided upon a rapprochement with Poland and a break with Russia. This policy was finalized by the German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact of January, 1934• The political orientation of German foreign policy, established by this pact, remained fixed in its outlines for the following five years. During these years, Hitler used the anti-Communist bogey.to justify his foreign policy coups and to ease his relations with Poland. Russia herself, he ignored as a power factor in opposition. Nor did he consider a political understanding with her. However, he did toy with the idea of her as an object of aggression.
    [Show full text]
  • Borders of Trianon Had Been Determined on May 8, 1919, One Year Before the Signing of the Peace Treaty
    FOREWORD The Peace Treaty of Trianon was Hungary’s turn of fate—a second Mohács. Hungary was compelled to sign it in one of the downturns of its history. Pál Teleki, the Prime Minister at that time who presented the peace treaty for parliamentary ratification, filed an indictment against himself in Parliament because he felt responsible... Recently, there has been increased interest concerning the Peace Treaty of Trianon. The subject of Trianon is inexhaustible. Nobody has yet written about Trianon in its complexity, and perhaps it will be long before anyone will. The subject is so complex that it must be studied from different angles, various scientific approaches, and using several methods. It remains unsettled, as its scholars can always discover new perspectives. This study - perhaps best described as a commentary - is not a scientific work. Rather, its goal is to enhance public awareness and offer a more current and realistic synthesis of the Peace Treaty of Trianon while incorporating more recent observations. Intended for a broad audience, its purpose is not to list historical events - as the historians have done and will continue to do - but rather to provide data regarding those geographic, economic and geo- political aspects and their correlation which have received inadequate attention in the literature on Trianon so far. Perhaps this work will also succeed in providing new perspectives. It is not as difficult to interpret and explain the text of the treaty as it is to write about and focus public attention on its spirit and its open and hidden aims. It is difficult - perhaps delicate - to write about its truths, how it really came about, and what effects it had on the Hungarian nation.
    [Show full text]
  • 8-13 Belarus and Belarusians
    Belarus and its Neighbors: Historical Perceptions and Political Constructs BelarusBelarus andand itsits Neighbors:Neighbors: HistoricalHistorical PerceptionsPerceptions andand PoliticalPolitical ConstructsConstructs InternationalInternational ConferenceConference PapersPapers EDITED BY ALEŚ Ł AHVINIEC TACIANA Č ULICKAJA WARSAW 2013 Editors: Aleś Łahviniec, Taciana Čulickaja Project manager: Anna Grudzińska Papers of the conference “Belarus and its Neighbors: Historical Perceptions and Political Constructs”. The conference was held on 9–11 of December 2011 in Warsaw, Poland. The conference was sponsored by Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Belarus Office, National Endowment for Democracy and Open Society Institute. Translation: Vieranika Mazurkievič Proof-reading: Nadzieja Šakun (Belarusian), Katie Morris (English), Adrianna Stansbury (English) Cover design: Małgorzata Butkiewicz Publication of this volume was made possible by National Endowment for Democracy. © Copyright by Uczelnia Łazarskiego, Warsaw 2013 Oficyna Wydawnicza Uczelni Łazarskiego 02-662 Warszawa ul. Świeradowska 43 tel. 22 54-35-450, 22 54-35-410 [email protected] www.lazarski.pl ISBN: 978-83-60694-49-7 OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS Implementation of publishing: Dom Wydawniczy ELIPSA ul. Infl ancka 15/198, 00-189 Warszawa tel./fax 22 635 03 01, 22 635 17 85 e-mail: [email protected], www.elipsa.pl Contents Foreword ...................................................................................................... 7 Andrzej Sulima-Kamiński – Quo Vadis, Belarus? Instead of an
    [Show full text]
  • Transylvanian Review
    RANSYLVANIAN EVIEW Vol. XXVI T R No. 3 /REVUE DE TRANSYLVANIE Autumn 2017 Contents/Sommaire ROMANIAN ACADEMY Chairman: • Paradigms Academician Ionel-Valentin Vlad Es ist die größte Torheit, mit vielen Worten nichts sagen: Eine inhaltliche, sprachliche und CENTER FOR handlungskommunikative Betrachtung über TRANSYLVANIAN STUDIES Martin Luthers Sprichwörter und Redensarten 3 Director: Veronica Câmpian Academician Ioan-Aurel Pop La città di Cluj e la Riforma protestante nel XVI secolo 16 Ioan-Aurel Pop The Irenical Impact of David Pareus’ Work on the Hungarian Protestant Churches 38 Olga Lukács Under the Sway of Orthodoxy and the Reformation: Romanian-Saxon Confessional Relations in Transylvania between 1688 and 1848 54 Mircea-Gheorghe Abrudan • Focus Laudatio 72 Ioan-Aurel Pop Speech by His Royal Highness Charles, Prince of Wales 76 • Transsilvanica Dominikus, Bischof von Cenad (1360–1373) und Oradea (1373–1374), und sein Wirken vor der Bischofsweihe 80 Peter Labanc • Tangencies Revisiting Romania’s Regional Approach: Lessons from the Recent Past 94 On the cover: Horaþiu Sorin Dan ªERBAN SAVU, Mircea Teodor Maniu Bertha as Saint Jerome (2017), oil on canvas, 192×157 cm • Communio The Birth of a Group: Two Roma Micro-Groups Transylvanian Review continues the in Bukovina and Transylvania 109 tradition of Revue de Transylvanie, founded by Silviu Dragomir, which Elena Marushiakova was published in Cluj and then in Sibiu Vesselin Popov between 1934 and 1944. The Rusyns in Romania: Transylvanian Review is published quarterly by the Center for Transylvanian A Minority Hidden in a Minority 124 Studies and the Romanian Academy. Marc Stegherr EDITORIAL BOARD • Philosophy CESARE ALZATI, Ph.D. Seduction, Communication and Leadership 137 Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione, Istituto di Storia Moderna e Contemporanea, Sandu Frunzã Università Cattolica, Milan, Italy • Book Reviews HORST FASSEL, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]