DOCSLIB.ORG

Great Power Policies Towards Central Europe, 1914–1945 Aliaksandr Piahanau

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Great Power Policies Towards Central Europe, 1914–1945 Aliaksandr Piahanau Great Power Policies towards Central Europe, 1914–1945 Aliaksandr Piahanau To cite this version: Aliaksandr Piahanau. Great Power Policies towards Central Europe, 1914–1945. E-International Relations, 2019, 1910814458. hal-02065018 HAL Id: hal-02065018 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02065018 Submitted on 25 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 EDITED BY ALIAKSANDR PIAHANAU Great Power Policies Towards Central Europe 1914–1945 This e-book is provided without charge via free download by E-International Relations (www.E-IR.info). It is not permitted to be sold in electronic format under any circumstances. If you enjoy our free e-books, please consider leaving a small donation to allow us to continue investing in open access publications: http://www.e-ir.info/about/donate/ iii Great Power Policies Towards Central Europe 1914–1945 EDITED BY ALIAKSANDR PIAHANAU iv E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, England 2019 ISBN 978-1-910814-45-1 This book is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You are free to: • Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: • Attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • Non-Commercial – You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission. Please contact [email protected] for any such enquiries, including for licensing and translation requests. Other than the terms noted above, there are no restrictions placed on the use and dissemination of this book for student learning materials/ scholarly use. Production: William Kakenmaster Cover Image: Andrey_Kuzmin / Keport via Depositphotos A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. v E-IR Edited Collections Series Editors: Stephen McGlinchey, Marianna Karakoulaki and Agnieszka Pikulicka-Wilczewska Books Editor: Cameran Clayton Copy-editing: Corey McCabe and Farah Saleem Editorial assistance: Jakob R. Avgustin, Hayden Paulsen, Christian Marks, Fernanda de Castro Brandão Martins and Alex Tanchev. E-IR’s Edited Collections are open access scholarly books presented in a format that preferences brevity and accessibility while retaining academic conventions. Each book is available in print and digital versions, and is published under a Creative Commons license. As E-International Relations is committed to open access in the fullest sense, free electronic versions of all of our books, including this one, are available on our website. Find out more at: http://www.e-ir.info/publications About the E-International Relations website E-International Relations (www.E-IR.info) is the world’s leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics, reaching over 3.5 million readers each year. E-IR’s daily publications feature expert articles, blogs, reviews and interviews – as well as student learning resources. The website is run by a registered non-profit organisation based in Bristol, UK and staffed with an all-volunteer team of students and scholars. vi Acknowledgments The preparation of this book has greatly benefited from the help of many individuals and organisations. The idea of making this volume was born and tested at two special panels dedicated to the ‘great power policies towards Central Europe,’ which were part of the 4th and 5th International Congresses of the Belarusian Studies in Kaunas, Lithuania in October 2014 and October 2015. I wish to thank the Congress Organising Committee and the paper contributors, who supported the project from the beginning. However, this collection would have never been achieved without assistance of Dr. Raisa Barash, Dr. Andras Becker and Silvana Vulcan, who helped with the translation of some papers into English, and also of Linda Ouma and Nicolas Vahdias, who pointed out some language shortcomings. Last, but not least, I feel indebted to the E-International Relations team whose assistance was crucial in finalising this book. vii Abstract This book provides an overview of the various forms and trajectories of Great Power policy towards Central Europe between 1914 and 1945. This involves the analyses of diplomatic, military, economic and cultural perspectives of Germany, Russia, Britain, and the USA towards Hungary, Poland, the Baltic States, Czechoslovakia and Romania. The contributions of established, as well as emerging, historians from different parts of Europe enriches the English language scholarship on the history of the international relations of the region. The volume is designed to be accessible and informative to both historians and wider audiences. --- Aliaksandr Piahanau received his PhD from Toulouse University, France. viii Contributors Sorin Arhire is a Lecturer at the ‘1 Decembrie 1918’ University of Alba Iulia, Romania. Ivan Basenko is a PhD Candidate at the National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy, Ukraine. Agne Cepinskyte holds a PhD in International Relations from King’s College London, UK. Oleg Ken (1960–2007) was a Professor at Herzen University and European University, Saint Petersburg, Russia. Tamás Magyarics is a Professor at Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, and a Hungarian diplomat. Halina Parafianowicz is a Professor at the Institute of History and Political Science of the Białystok University, Poland. Alexander Rupasov is a Senior Researcher at the Institute of History in Saint-Petersburg of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Ignác Romsics is a member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. He teaches at the Esterházy Károly University, Eger, Hungary. Artem Zorin is an Associate Professor in Vyatka State University, Russia. ix Contents INTRODUCTION Aliaksandr Piahanau 1 PART ONE - GEOPOLITICS AND SECURITY 1. HUNGARY’S PLACE IN GERMAN SOUTH-EAST EUROPEAN POLICY, 1919–1944 Ignác Romsics 7 2. MOSCOW AND THE BALTIC STATES: EXPERIENCE OF RELATIONSHIPS, 1917–1939 Oleg Ken and Alexander Rupasov 43 PART TWO - ECONOMY AND DIPLOMACY 3. BALANCING IN CENTRAL EUROPE: GREAT BRITAIN AND HUNGARY IN THE 1920S Tamás Magyarics 77 4. BRITISH POLICY TOWARDS ROMANIA, 1936–41 Sorin Arhire 91 5. AMERICAN POLICY TOWARDS CZECHOSLOVAKIA, 1918–1945 Artem Zorin 107 PART THREE - PROPAGANDA AND PERCEPTIONS 6. THE GREAT WAR AND THE POLISH QUESTION IN IMPERIAL RUSSIA: A CASE STUDY OF ITS REFLECTIONS IN KIEV’S PRESS, 1914–1917 Ivan Basenko 129 7. THE BALTIC DREAM OF A ‘HANDICAPPED’ GREAT POWER: THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC’S POLICIES TOWARDS THE BALTIC-GERMANS Agne Cepinskyte 153 8. HERBERT C. HOOVER AND POLAND, 1929–1933: BETWEEN MYTH AND REALITY Halina Parafianowicz 176 NOTE ON INDEXING 199 x 1 Great Power Policies Towards Central Europe 1914–1945 Introduction ALIAKSANDR PIAHANAU In the first half of the 20th century Central Europe repeatedly set the stage for Great Power rivalry and conflict, as well as political, economic and cultural exchange. With a touch of irony, contemporary Hungarian writer Lajos Grendel described the region as a mere sum of small landlocked countries that could be occupied by foreign armies from any direction and whose inhabitants and governments faced multiple foreign interferences during their lifespans. Indeed, during the Great War, the interwar period and World War 2, the area situated between Germany and Russia became the target of covert or direct expansion. The context of Great Power meddling in Central Europe in the period 1914– 45 offers numerous perspectives. The multiple and often conflicting regional viewpoints about national identity, frontier and territory had not only underpinned regional interstate antagonisms, but at the same time provided a platform for Great Power interference. This collection of studies provides an overview of the various forms and trajectories of Great Power policies towards Central Europe between 1914 and 1945. This involves the analyses of perspectives, such as the diplomatic, military, economic or cultural policy of Weimar and Nazi Germany, tsarist and Bolshevik Russia, Great Britain, and the US on Central European countries, like Hungary, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Czechoslovakia and Romania. The contributions of established as well as emerging historians from different parts of Europe are aimed at enriching the English language scholarship on the history of international relations. The volume is divided into three parts and, in total, contains eight papers. The first part, entitled ‘Geopolitics and Security,’ illustrates how two European Introduction 2 continental powers – Germany and Russia, whose frontiers set the limits of Central Europe, programmed their regional agenda and tried to implement it. Their ultimate objective was the expansion of influence in the region. The Great War brought military defeat, political and economic weakness, international humiliation and isolation for both powers. Despite the fact that they
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trials of the War Criminals
    TRIALS OF THE WAR CRIMINALS General Considerations The Fascist regime that ruled Romania between September 14, 1940, and August 23, 1944, was brought to justice in Bucharest in May 1946, and after a short trial, its principal leaders—Ion and Mihai Antonescu and two of their closest assistants—were executed, while others were sentenced to life imprisonment or long terms of detention. At that time, the trial’s verdicts seemed inevitable, as they indeed do today, derived inexorably from the defendants’ decisions and actions. The People’s Tribunals functioned for a short time only. They were disbanded on June 28, 1946,1 although some of the sentences were not pronounced until sometime later. Some 2,700 cases of suspected war criminals were examined by a commission formed of “public prosecutors,”2 but only in about half of the examined cases did the commission find sufficient evidence to prosecute, and only 668 were sentenced, many in absentia.3 There were two tribunals, one in Bucharest and one in Cluj. It is worth mentioning that the Bucharest tribunal sentenced only 187 people.4 The rest were sentenced by the tribunal in Cluj. One must also note that, in general, harsher sentences were pronounced by the Cluj tribunal (set up on June 22, 1 Marcel-Dumitru Ciucă, “Introducere” in Procesul maresalului Antonescu (Bucharest: Saeculum and Europa Nova, 1995-98), vol. 1: p. 33. 2 The public prosecutors were named by communist Minister of Justice Lucret iu Pătrăşcanu and most, if not all of them were loyal party members, some of whom were also Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • British Clandestine Activities in Romania During the Second World
    British Clandestine Activities in Romania during the Second World War This page intentionally left blank British Clandestine Activities in Romania during the Second World War Dennis Deletant Visiting ‘Ion Ra¸tiu’ Professor of Romanian Studies, Georgetown University, USA © Dennis Deletant 2016 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2016 978–1–137–57451–0 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2016 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Question of War Reparations in Polish-German Relations After World War Ii
    Patrycja Sobolewska* THE QUESTION OF WAR REPARATIONS IN POLISH-GERMAN RELATIONS AFTER WORLD WAR II DOI: 10.26106/gc8d-rc38 PWPM – Review of International, European and Comparative Law, vol. XVII, A.D. MMXIX ARTICLE I. Introduction There is no doubt that World War II was the bloodiest conflict in history. Involv- ing all the great powers of the world, the war claimed over 70 million lives and – as a consequence – has changed world politics forever. Since it all started in Poland that was invaded by Germany after having staged several false flag border incidents as a pretext to initiate the attack, this country has suffered the most. On September 17, 1939 Poland was also invaded by the Soviet Union. Ultimately, the Germans razed Warsaw to the ground. War losses were enormous. The library and museum collec- tions have been burned or taken to Germany. Monuments and government buildings were blown up by special German troops. About 85 per cent of the city had been destroyed, including the historic Old Town and the Royal Castle.1 Despite the fact that it has been 80 years since this cataclysmic event, the Polish government has not yet received any compensation from German authorities that would be proportionate to the losses incurred. The issue in question is still a bone of contention between these two states which has not been regulated by both par- ties either. The article examines the question of war reparations in Polish-German relations after World War II, taking into account all the relevant factors that can be significant in order to resolve this problem.
    [Show full text]
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate
    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
    [Show full text]
  • Riigikogu Aastaraamat 2019/2020 Riigikogu Aastaraamat 2019/2020
    RIIGIKOGU AASTARAAMAT 2019/2020 AASTARAAMAT RIIGIKOGU RIIGIKOGU AASTARAAMAT 2019/2020 RIIGIKOGU AASTARAAMAT 2019/2020 Riigikogu Kantselei 2020 RIIGIKOGU AASTARAAMAT 2019/2020 1 Riigikogu aastaraamat 2019/2020 Aastaraamat koondab perioodi 30. märts 2019 – 13. september 2020 ning on valminud Riigikogu Kantselei ja Eesti Rahvusraamatukogu koostöös Peatoimetaja Tõnu Kaljumäe Koostanud ja toimetanud Rita Hillermaa, Piret Pärgma ja Piret Viljamaa Keeleliselt toimetanud Gerli Randjärv Kujundanud ja küljendanud Tuuli Aule Fotod: Erik Peinar, Riigikogu Kantselei ISSN 1736-776X (trükis) ISSN 2733-2020 (võrguväljaanne) Autoriõigus – Riigikogu Kantselei 2020, Eesti Rahvusraamatukogu 2020 2 RIIGIKOGU AASTARAAMAT 2019/2020 SISUKORD SAATESÕNA PARLAMENTAARNE Peep Jahilo 5 KONTROLL 46 Arupärimised 47 Kirjalikud küsimused 48 RIIGIKOGU XIV KOOSSEIS: Infotunniküsimused 49 VALIMISED, JUHATUS JA Umbusaldushääletused 51 FRAKTSIOONID 6 Muu kontrolltegevus 52 Valimised 7 Juhatus 11 Fraktsioonid 12 TEGEVUS MUUDES Koosseisu muudatused 16 VALDKONDADES 54 Fakte Riigikogu liikmete kohta 17 VÄLISSUHTLUS 60 RIIGIKOGU KOMISJONID: Riigikogu delegatsioonid 62 TEGEVUSE ÜLEVAADE 18 Riigikogu väliskülalised 63 Euroopa Liidu asjade komisjon 19 Riigikogu juhatuse välisvisiidid 67 Keskkonnakomisjon 20 Parlamendirühmad 67 Kultuurikomisjon 22 Maaelukomisjon 23 Majanduskomisjon 25 RIIGIKOGU Põhiseaduskomisjon 27 JA AVALIKKUS 68 Rahanduskomisjon 29 Riigikaitsekomisjon 31 Sotsiaalkomisjon 33 Väliskomisjon 35 Õiguskomisjon 37 Julgeolekuasutuste järelevalve erikomisjon 39 Korruptsioonivastane
    [Show full text]
  • Building an Unwanted Nation: the Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository BUILDING AN UNWANTED NATION: THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP AND AUSTRIAN PROPONENTS OF A SEPARATE NATIONHOOD, 1918-1934 Kevin Mason A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2007 Approved by: Advisor: Dr. Christopher Browning Reader: Dr. Konrad Jarausch Reader: Dr. Lloyd Kramer Reader: Dr. Michael Hunt Reader: Dr. Terence McIntosh ©2007 Kevin Mason ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Kevin Mason: Building an Unwanted Nation: The Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934 (Under the direction of Dr. Christopher Browning) This project focuses on American and British economic, diplomatic, and cultural ties with Austria, and particularly with internal proponents of Austrian independence. Primarily through loans to build up the economy and diplomatic pressure, the United States and Great Britain helped to maintain an independent Austrian state and prevent an Anschluss or union with Germany from 1918 to 1934. In addition, this study examines the minority of Austrians who opposed an Anschluss . The three main groups of Austrians that supported independence were the Christian Social Party, monarchists, and some industries and industrialists. These Austrian nationalists cooperated with the Americans and British in sustaining an unwilling Austrian nation. Ultimately, the global depression weakened American and British capacity to practice dollar and pound diplomacy, and the popular appeal of Hitler combined with Nazi Germany’s aggression led to the realization of the Anschluss .
    [Show full text]
  • Ettekande Fail
    Põhiseaduse tegijad Hannes Vallikivi ja nende päritolu 1919 1920 märts aprill mai juuni juuli august sept okt nov dets jaan veebr märts aprill mai juuni MNK APSK VAK PSK I PSK II PSK III PS Uluotsa APS eelnõu Uluotsa II PS eelnõu Uluotsa I PS eelnõu Riigikohtu, kohtunike, riigikontrolöri, peastaabi, ministrite jt kommentaarid MNK APSK PSK § Palvadre § Asson, Jans, Kurs-Olesk, Oinas, Vain § Ast, Kartau, Kurs-Olesk, Neps, Vain jt § Ruubel § Anderkopp, Kalbus, Olesk, Tomberg § Anderkopp, Kalbus, Olesk, Ruubel, Strandman, Talts jt § Maim, Parts § Parts, Poska, Tõnisson, Westholm § Kuusner, Maim, Parts, Poska jt § Linnamägi § Kann § Kann, Leesment § Uluots § Uluots § Uluots § Pezold, Koch § Kruus § Loorits, Kruus § Sorokin MNK = Maanõukogu juristide komisjon; APSK = ajutise põhiseaduse komisjon; PSK = põhiseaduskomisjon; VAK = valitsemise ajutine kord; PS = põhiseadus © Hannes Vallikivi 2020 Erakondade aktiivsus (VAK) Erakondade aktiivsus (PS) kristlik rahvaerakond tööerakond rahvaerakond rahvaerakond 4% 21% 11% 34% kristlik rahvaerakond 4% maaliit 21% maaliit 12% sakslased 1% sakslased 4% venelased tööerakond 3% venelased 15% 1% sotsiaaldemokraadid esseerid 42% esseerid sotsiaaldemokraadid 0% 5% 22% Saadikute aktiivsus (VAK) Saadikute aktiivsus (PS) Tõnisson Uluots Einbund Päts Olesk Ast Vain Seljamaa Jans Sorokin Ast Jans Päts Tõnisson* Strandman Olesk Oinas Anderkopp Vain Kruus © Hannes Vallikivi 2020 MNK APSK VAK PSK PS PM KM Koht. MNK APSK VAK PSK PS PM KM Koht. Anderkopp, Ado Olesk, Lui Asson, Emma Palvadre, Anton Ast, Karl Parts, Kaarel
    [Show full text]
  • From Ukrainian People's Republic to the Hetmanate
    The Perception of Germany in the Kyivan Press: From Ukrainian People’s Republic to the Hetmanate (November 1917 — December 1918) Author(s): Ivan Basenko Source: Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal 4 (2017): 67–84 Published by: National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy http://kmhj.ukma.edu.ua/ The Perception of Germany in the Kyivan Press: From Ukrainian People’s Republic to the Hetmanate (November 1917 — December 1918) Ivan Basenko National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Department of History Abstract The 1917 February Revolution led to the reshaping of the war-era image of the German enemy. Focusing on the former imperial borderland province of the Southwestern Krai, this article unveils the national, political, and cultural considerations of the local Ukrainian and Russian- language media that affected their attitude towards the Germans. It argues that the developments of the 1917–1918 Ukrainian Revolution presented a unique case of constructing the image of the Germans due to the ongoing rivalry between the respective Ukrainian and Russian national projects. The study is based on the materials of prominent Kyivan daily newspapers, thus rendering the spectrum of the region’s political thought. Built upon the concept of imagology, the article apprehends the images of “otherness” in conjunction with the actor’s own identity. Key Words: image of the Germans, Kyivan press, Ukrainian Revolution, nationalism, First World War. 3 Introduction Throughout the First World War, the image of the ultimate German threat had served as a key instrument of the Russian Empire’s mass mobilization and war effort. However, by the time the 1917 February Revolution broke out, this propaganda construct had already been overshadowed by general war weariness.1 The downfall of the Romanov dynasty brought to an end the country’s rigid “war till victory” policy and thus shattered the uniform image of the enemy.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Role in Romanian's Diplomatic Struggle (1St Of
    Tarih Okulu Dergisi (TOD) Journal of History School (JOHS) Eylül 2013 September 2013 Yıl 6, Sayı XV, ss. 355-384. Year 6, Issue XV, pp. 355-384. DOI No: http://dx.doi.org/10.14225/Joh305 TURKEY’S ROLE IN ROMANIAN’S DIPLOMATIC STRUGGLE (1ST OF FEBRUARY 1943 - 23RD OF AUGUST 1944) Liliana Boscan ALTIN Ömer METİN Abstract The present study aimed to to focus on the intense diplomatic activity developed by Romania in efforts to negotiate an armistice with the Allies especially between September 1943 and August 1944. Romania which was joined into the Axis Countries upon executing an agreement with Germany would have felt the Soviet threat on its borders upon defeat of Germany in Stalingrad front. On the other hand, although Turkey had saved its neutral position from the beginning of the war, it had tried to support Romania, its ally in the Balkan Pact, in a political dimension in case the risk of Soviet expansion across the Balkans. As Turkey did not desire Romania to be partitioned, it played an active role in regard to making a fare cease-fire agreement between Romanian Government and the Allies. Starting the spring of 1943, the Romanian diplomacy, including here Ion Antonescu Marshal, the King and the opposition parties, engaging in consistent separate peace negotiations with the United Kingdom using the mediation of Turkey. The paper is based on unpublished documents found in the Romanian diplomatic and national archives. Key Words : Turkey, Romania, Second World War, Diplomacy. Romanya’nın Diplomasi Mücadelesinde Türkiye’nin Rolü (1 Şubat 1943 – 23 Ağustos 1944) Dr., The Romanian Association for Middle East Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Politics of Hungary and Romania Between 1940 and 1944
    ACTA UNIV. SAPIENTIAE, EUROPEAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 16 (2019) 59–74 DOI: 10 .2478/auseur-2019-0012 Minority Politics of Hungary and Romania between 1940 and 1944. The System of Reciprocity and Its Consequences1 János Kristóf MURÁDIN PhD, Assistant Professor Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) Faculty of Sciences and Arts e-mail: muradinjanos@sapientia .ro Abstract . The main objective of the paper is to highlight the changes in the situation of the Hungarian minority in Romania and the Romanian minority in Hungary living in the divided Transylvania from the Second Vienna Arbitration from 30 August 1940 to the end of WWII . The author analyses the Hungarian and Romanian governments’ attitude regarding the new borders and their intentions with the minorities remaining on their territories . The paper offers a synthesis of the system of reciprocity, which determined the relations between the two states on the minority issue until 1944. Finally, the negative influence of the politics of reciprocity is shown on the interethnic relations in Transylvania . Keywords: Transylvania, Second Vienna Arbitration, border, minorities, politics of reciprocity, refugees Introduction According to the Second Vienna Arbitration of 30 August 1940, the northern part of Transylvania, the Szeklerland, and the Máramaros (in Romanian: Maramureş, in German: Maramuresch) region, which had been awarded to Romania twenty years earlier, were returned to Hungary (L . Balogh 2002: 5) . According to the 1941 census, the population of a total of 43,104 km2 of land under Hungarian jurisdiction (Thrirring 1940: 663) was 2,557,260, of whom 53 .6% were Hungarian and 39 .9% were Romanian speakers .
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfram Wette: Német Propaganda És a Csatlós Országok
    470 WOLFRAM WETTE Német propaganda és a csatlósországok: Magyarország, Románia és Bulgária (1941-43) /. A Délkelet-Európa felé irányuló német propaganda néhány sajátossága Az elfogulatlan szemlélő joggal teheti fel a kérdést, hogy létezett-e egyáltalán különleges német propaganda a délkelet-európai csatlósországok, Magyarország, Románia és Bulgária felé a második világháború idején? Hiszen ezek az országok — a hivatalos verzió szerint — „szövetségesek", illetve „baráti országok",1 azaz szuverén államok voltak, amelyek belső ügyeiket saját belátásuk szerint intézték, tehát propagandatevékenységüket is maguk alakították. Amint tudjuk, ezeknek az országoknak a szuverenitásával más volt a helyzet, mint ahogy ezt a hivatalos nyelvhasználat próbálta beállítani. Ezek ugyanis már a harmincas évek végén, de legkésőbb a negyvenes évek elején először a gazdasági behatolás útján, később politikailag is erős függőségbe kerültek a Német Birodalomtól. Ha kritikusan értékeljük a függetlenség 1941 nyarára — a Szovjetunió elleni háború kezdetére — elért fokát, jogos kétségeink támadhatnak, hogy a szövetséges szó helyesen írja-e körül ezeknek az országoknak Németországhoz fűződő valódi viszonyait. Közben kelet- és nyugat- európai történészek is használták a „csatlósállamokJ'2 fogalmát. Ha ezen a fogalmon azt értjük, hogy bár ezek az államok formáüsan függetlenek voltak, ténylegesen azonban a német nagyhatalom bizonyos befolyása alatt álltak, akkor alkalmazása bizonyára bölcs. A következő fejtegetések egyik célja, hogy részben új forrásanyag segítségével megmutassa, a német propaganda eljárási módja is bizonyítja a csatlós-státuszt. Mert a nemzetiszocialista rezsim ténylegesen nem mondott le arról, hogy propagandát folytasson a „szövetségesek" körében; csak éppen más módszereket alkalmazott, mint a birodalmon belül vagy a megszállt országokban. 1A tanácsokért és ösztönzésért köszönetet mondok kollegáimnak, Dr. J. Försternek, P. Konstantynak, Dr. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross & Cockade International
    Cross & Cockade International THE FIRST WORLD WAR AVIATION HISTORICAL SOCIETY Registered Charity No 1117741 1970 to 2015 www.crossandcockade.com ABSTRACTS for JOURNAL VOLUMES 1- 46 There are 1131 abstract articles listed in over 10,072 pages in the 45 years worth of Cross & Cockade. These contain some of the most interesting and informative articles about the people and aircraft during World War One. Written by renowned WWI experts and over 10,392 photographs. Read as Year, Season, Page “year . issue . page”, Title, Author and Description. 1970 Vol. 1 - pg.1 1979 Vol. 10 - pg.8 1988 Vol. 19 - pg.15 1997 Vol. 28 - pg.24 2006 Vol. 37 - pg.33 1971 Vol. 2 - pg.1 1980 Vol. 11 - pg.9 1989 Vol. 20 - pg.16 1998 Vol. 29 - pg.25 2007 Vol. 38 - pg.34 1972 Vol. 3 - pg.2 1981 Vol. 12 - pg.10 1990 Vol. 21 - pg.17 1999 Vol. 30 - pg.26 2008 Vol. 39 - pg.35 1973 Vol. 4 - pg.3 1982 Vol. 13 - pg.10 1991 Vol. 22 - pg.18 2000 Vol. 31 - pg.27 2009 Vol. 40 - pg.36 1974 Vol. 5 - pg.4 1983 Vol. 14 - pg.11 1992 Vol. 23 - pg.18 2001 Vol. 32 - pg.28 2010 Vol. 41 - pg.37 1975 Vol. 6 - pg.4 1984 Vol. 15 - pg.12 1993 Vol. 24 - pg.20 2002 Vol. 33 - pg.29 2011 Vol. 42 - pg.38 1976 Vol. 7 - pg.5 1985 Vol. 16 - pg.12 1994 Vol. 25 - pg.21 2003 Vol. 34 - pg.30 2012 Vol. 43 - pg.39 1977 Vol.
    [Show full text]