World Bank Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Bank Document Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: 54600-AR Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT PAPER ON A PROPOSED SECOND ADDITIONAL LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$40.0 MILLION TO THE Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FOR A LIFELINE ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT June 18, 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized Sustainable Development Department South Caucasus Country Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective April 6, 2010) Currency Unit = Armenian Dram (AMD) AMD 1 = US$0.0025 US$ 1 = AMD 400 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic AMD Armenian Dram ARD Armenian Roads Directorate CPS Country Partnership Strategy EMF Environmental Management Framework EMP Environmental Management Plan EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return GDP Gross Domestic Product IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development IDA International Development Association IFRs Interim Financial Reports LRN Lifeline Road Network LRIP Lifeline Roads Improvement Project LRIP-AF1 Lifeline Roads Improvement Project Additional Financing LRIP-AF2 Lifeline Roads Improvement Project Second Additional Financing MoF Ministry of Finance MoTC Ministry of Transport and Communication NPV Net Present Value PDO Project Development Objective PIU Transport Project Implementation Unit Vice President: Philippe H. Le Houerou Country Director: Asad Alam Sector Manager: Henry G. R. Kerali Task Team Leader: Olivier Le Ber Co-Task Team Leader: Satoshi Ishihara ARMENIA LIFELINE ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – SECOND ADDITIONAL FINANCING CONTENTS I. Introduction 1 II. Background and Rationale for Second Additional Financing 1 III. Proposed Changes 4 IV. Consistency with Country Partnership Strategy 5 V. Appraisal of Scaled-Up Project Activities 5 VI. Expected Outcomes 10 VII. Benefits and Risks 11 VIII. Financial Terms and Conditions for the Additional Financing 12 Annex 1 Revised Arrangements for Results Monitoring 13 Map IBRD 37883 This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. Project Paper Data Sheet Date: 06/18/2010 Team Leader: Olivier Le Ber Country: Armenia Sector Manager: Henry G. Kerali Project Name: Armenia Lifeline Country Director: Asad Alam Roads Improvement Project – Second Environmental Category: B Additional Financing Original Project ID: P115486 Second AF Project ID: P121287 Borrower: Republic of Armenia Responsible agency: Ministry of Transport and Communication (MoTC) Revised estimated disbursements (Bank FY/US$m) (Original Project + AF1 + AF2) FY 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Annual 7.5 42.5 25 21.6 5 Cumulative 7.5 50 75 96.6 101.6 Current closing date: 12/31/2011 Revised closing date: 12/31/2013 Does the project require any exceptions from Bank policies? ○ Yes ● No Have these been approved by Bank management? ○ Yes ○ No Is approval for any policy exception sought from the Board? ○ Yes ○ No Revised project development objectives/outcomes The Project Development Objective is the same as under the original project, which is to upgrade selected sections of the Lifeline Road Network and create temporary employment in road construction. The results framework and the monitoring indicators have been updated to monitor the additional rehabilitation of approximately 190km of the Lifeline Road Network and about 19,000 person-months of additional job created. Does the project trigger any new safeguard policies? No For Second Additional Financing [X] Loan [ ] Credit [ ] Grant For Loans/Credits/Grants: Total Bank financing (US$m.) US$ 40.0 million Proposed terms: Flexible Loan at 6-month LIBOR for US Dollar, plus variable spread, with 25 year maturity and 10 years of grace period with level repayment of principal. Financing Plan (US$m.) (AF2) Source Local Foreign Total Borrower/Recipient 9.98 0 9.98 IBRD 24.00 16.00 40.00 Others 0 0 0 Total 33.98 16.00 49.98 Financing Plan (US$m.) (Original project + AF1 + AF2) Source Local Foreign Total Borrower/Recipient 24.50 0 24.50 IBRD 45.90 30.70 76.60 IDA 25.00 0 25.00 Others 0 0 0 Total 95.40 30.70 126.10 I. Introduction 1. This Project Paper seeks the approval of the Executive Directors to provide an additional loan in the amount of US$40 million to the Republic of Armenia for the Lifeline Roads Improvement Project (LRIP) (Credit: IDA-4549-AM). The proposed Second Additional Financing (LRIP-AF2) Loan would finance the scaling up of the project activities through rehabilitating approximately 190km of the Lifeline Road Network1 (LRN) and helping further mitigate the impact of the financial crisis by creating temporary employment in road construction. It would also finance the design of project roads and future projects, supervision of works, procurement of data collection equipment, capacity development in pavement design and road safety, project operating costs, and financial and technical audits. 2. The Project Development Objective (PDO) would remain the same as in the original Project. The results framework and the monitoring indicators have been revised to reflect the increased scope of the Project. There are no changes to the implementation arrangements. There would be no co-financing from other donors as was the case in the original Project. The closing date is being extended by two years, from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 to allow for all activities to be completed and fully cover the defect liability period of two years. 3. The proposed LRIP-AF2 is being requested for "implementation of additional or expanded activities that scale up a project‘s impact and effectiveness", as described in OP/BP13.20. The ongoing LRIP meets the criteria and conditions of OP/BP13.20 for additional financing for Project scale-up. II. Background and Rationale for Second Additional Financing 4. Original Project and first Additional Financing: The original Lifeline Roads Improvement Project (US$25 million equivalent IDA Credit) was prepared under the "IDA Financial Crisis Response Fast-Track Facility" utilizing OP 8.0, Rapid Response to Crisis and Emergencies, in order to mitigate the impact of the global financial crisis in Armenia. The LRIP was approved by the Board on February 24, 2009, and became effective on April 10, 2009. The Project Development Objective of the LRIP is ―to upgrade selected sections of the LRN and create temporary employment in road construction‖. On August 27, 2009, the Board approved the First Additional Financing2 (LRIP-AF1) in the amount of US$36.6 million (IBRD-7751- AM). The LRIP-AF1 aimed to scale up the project's activities through rehabilitating an additional 140km of the LRN and creating more temporary jobs in road construction. The LRIP- AF1 became effective on November 20, 2009. Overall, the original project aims to rehabilitate about 240 km of the LRN and create 17,650 person-months of jobs in road construction. 5. The implementation of the original project has progressed well. The Implementation Status and Results ratings for Implementation Progress/Development Objectives have been rated 1 The LRN roads are rural road links that connect rural communities in the country to an interstate road; they comprise some 3,014 kilometers of Armenia‘s 7,704 kilometers (39.1 percent) of nonurban roads. 2 This first Additional Financing was provided as an IBRD Loan. 1 Satisfactory (S) for the past 12 months and the project is expected to fully achieve its Development Objectives. Below are the key achievements thus far: a) About 153km of the LRN, including 35km under the LRIP-AF1, were rehabilitated within eight months of the project becoming effective, allowing the Government to swiftly mitigate the negative impact of the financial crisis. The original Credit outperformed the target by rehabilitating 118km of roads (i.e. 18 percent more than the original project length) thanks to the significant cost savings generated from the reduction in the cost of construction and the adoption of more cost effective design standards during the implementation.3 b) About 12,000 person-months of jobs have been created under the original Credit, 50 percent higher than the target value. 4 By hiring region-based contractors the Project helped local construction industries remain on business. On average, original Credit contracts accounted for about 25 percent of contractors‘ revenue during the period between June and December 2009, and for nine contractors, the original Credit contracts were the only contracts they had during the same period. c) Basic access to social services and livelihood opportunities has been improved by connecting rural poor to the main road network. Travel time was reduced on average by about 40 percent, which helped reduce income and non-income poverty among the rural population in Armenia. 6. By December 31, 2009, the original Credit had been fully disbursed. With regard to the LRIP-AF1, about US$20 million (54 percent of the IBRD loan) has already been disbursed within nine months since it was approved by the Board.5 It is expected that the LRIP-AF1 will be fully disbursed well before the current closing date of December 31, 2011. 7. Both the original project and the LRIP-AF1 were assigned environmental category B. The Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) was prepared for each road section in line with the Environmental Management Framework (EMF), and local communities and interested parties were consulted prior to the start of the works on the respective sections. No land acquisition has occurred under the project. 8. Rationale for the second Additional Financing: Armenia is experiencing one of the most severe economic crises since early 1990s. Although the Government prioritized expenditures that would save or create jobs in the short-term and protect the poor, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) declined by 14.4 percent and the fiscal deficit increased to 7.5 percent of the GDP in 2009.
Recommended publications
  • European Union Foreign Affairs Journal
    European Union Foreign Affairs Journal eQuarterly for European Foreign, Foreign Trade, Development, Security Policy, EU-Third Country Relations and Regional Integration (EUFAJ) N° 04– 2015 ISSN 2190-6122 Contents Editorial ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 New Members of the Editorial Advisory Board ................................................................................................... 5 Presidential Elections in Belarus from 11.10.2015: What an Election Observer Mission Could Find Out .......... 6 The Systematic Roots of Russia’s Recession Marek Dabrowski ............................................................................................................................................... 20 Debate on Presidential Versus Parliamentary Systems: Should Armenia Opt for the Parliamentary System? Alik Sargsyan ...................................................................................................................................................... 38 Europe’s True Immigration Capacity: What We Can Learn from the US Green Card System Reinhilde Veugelers / Grace Choi ...................................................................................................................... 68 Trafficking in Human Beings in Conflict and Post-conflict Situation ................................................................ 75 Foreign Labour Force in the Economy of Modern Russia: Tendencies
    [Show full text]
  • Glendale Exhibits Explore Concept of Inherited Trauma of Armenian Genocide
    MARCH 24, 2018 Mirror-SpeTHE ARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXVIII, NO. 35, Issue 4530 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 INBRIEF Washington Armenian Aliyev Insists on Community Unites in ‘Historic Azeri Lands’ Support of Artsakh In Armenia BAKU (RFE/RL) — Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev has stood by his claims that much of By Aram Arkun modern-day Armenia lies in “historic Azerbaijani Mirror-Spectator Staff lands.” “I have repeatedly said and want to say once again that the territory of contemporary Armenia WASHINGTON — Upon the initiative of is historic Azerbaijani lands. There are numerous the representation of Artsakh in the United books and maps confirming that,” Aliyev said on States, the Armenian Assembly of America Monday, March 19, at the start of official celebra- and the Armenian National Committee of tions of Nowruz, the ancient Persian New Year America (ANCA) organized a reception and marked as a public holiday in Azerbaijan. banquet for the Armenian community on “The Azerbaijani youth must know this first and March 17 at the University Club in foremost. Let it know that most of modern-day Washington D. C. to honor the visiting del- Armenia is historic Azerbaijani lands. We will egation of the Republic of Artsakh led by never forget this,” he said. President Bako Sahakyan. Aliyev has repeatedly made such statements, The bilingual event was moderated by Annie Totah receives a medal from President Bako Sahakyan, while Aram Hamparian holds the medal he just got (photo: Aram Arkun) most recently on February 8. Speaking at a pre- Annie Simonian Totah, board member of election congress of his Yeni Azerbaycan party, he the Armenian Assembly, and Aram pledged to “return Azerbaijanis” to Yerevan, Hamparian, executive director of the two Armenian lobbying organizations of pointed out that the ANCA and the Syunik province and the area around Lake Sevan.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Report Armenia: North-South Road
    Environmental Assessment Report Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Document Stage: Draft Sub-project Number: 42145 August 2010 Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 Prepared by Ministry of Transport and Communications (MOTC) of Armenia for Asian Development Bank The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 – Environmental Impact Assessment Report ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank AARM ADB Armenian Resident Mission CO2 carbon dioxide EA executing agency EARF environmental assessment and review framework EIA environmental impact assessment EMP environmental management and monitoring plan IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MFF multi-tranche financing facility MNP Ministry of Nature Protection MOC Ministry of Culture MOH Ministry of Health MOTC Ministry of Transport and Communication NGO nongovernment organization NO2 nitrogen dioxide NO nitrogen oxide MPC maximum permissible concentration NPE Nature Protection Expertise NSS National Statistical Service PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PMU Project Management Unit PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RA Republic of Armenia RAMSAR Ramsar Convention on Wetlands REA Rapid Environmental Assessment (checklist) SEI State Environmental Inspectorate
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 1. Social Economic Background & Current Indicators of Syunik Region...........................2 2. Key Problems & Constraints .............................................................................................23 Objective Problems ...................................................................................................................23 Subjective Problems..................................................................................................................28 3. Assessment of Economic Resources & Potential ..............................................................32 Hydropower Generation............................................................................................................32 Tourism .....................................................................................................................................35 Electronics & Engineering ........................................................................................................44 Agriculture & Food Processing.................................................................................................47 Mineral Resources (other than copper & molybdenum)...........................................................52 Textiles......................................................................................................................................55 Infrastructures............................................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk
    Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development of the Republic of Armenia DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IDEAS GORIS, TEGH, GORHAYK, MEGHRI, VAYK, JERMUK, ZARITAP, URTSADZOR, NOYEMBERYAN, KOGHB, AYRUM, SARAPAT, AMASIA, ASHOTSK, ARPI Expert Team Varazdat Karapetyan Artyom Grigoryan Artak Dadoyan Gagik Muradyan GIZ Coordinator Armen Keshishyan September 2016 List of Acronyms MTAD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund GIZ German Technical Cooperation LoGoPro GIZ Local Government Programme LSG Local Self-government (bodies) (FY)MDP Five-year Municipal Development Plan PACA Participatory Assessment of Competitive Advantages RDF «Regional Development Foundation» Company LED Local economic development 2 Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................. 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Approaches to Project Implementation ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shirak Guidebook
    Wuthering Heights of Shirak -the Land of Steppe and Sky YYerevanerevan 22013013 1 Facts About Shirak FOREWORD Mix up the vast open spaces of the Shirak steppe, the wuthering wind that sweeps through its heights, the snowcapped tops of Mt. Aragats and the dramatic gorges and sparkling lakes of Akhurian River. Sprinkle in the white sheep fl ocks and the cry of an eagle. Add churches, mysterious Urartian ruins, abundant wildlife and unique architecture. Th en top it all off with a turbulent history, Gyumri’s joi de vivre and Gurdjieff ’s mystical teaching, revealing a truly magnifi cent region fi lled with experi- ences to last you a lifetime. However, don’t be deceived that merely seeing all these highlights will give you a complete picture of what Shirak really is. Dig deeper and you’ll be surprised to fi nd that your fondest memories will most likely lie with the locals themselves. You’ll eas- ily be touched by these proud, witt y, and legendarily hospitable people, even if you cannot speak their language. Only when you meet its remarkable people will you understand this land and its powerful energy which emanates from their sculptures, paintings, music and poetry. Visiting the province takes creativity and imagination, as the tourist industry is at best ‘nascent’. A great deal of the current tourist fl ow consists of Diasporan Armenians seeking the opportunity to make personal contributions to their historic homeland, along with a few scatt ered independent travelers. Although there are some rural “rest- places” and picnic areas, they cater mainly to locals who want to unwind with hearty feasts and family chats, thus rarely providing any activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Stocktaking Exercise to Identify Legal, Institutional, Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Gaps and Barriers in Water Resour
    “National Adaptation Plan to advance medium and long-term adaptation planning in Armenia” UNDP-GCF Project Stocktaking exercise to identify legal, institutional, vulnerability assessment and adaptation gaps and barriers in water resources management under climate change conditions Prepared by “Geoinfo” LLC Contract Number: RFP 088/2019 YEREVAN 2020 Produced by GeoInfo, Ltd., Charents 1, Yerevan, Armenia Action coordinated by Vahagn Tonoyan Date 11.06.2020 Version Final Produced for UNDP Climate Change Program Financed by: GCF-UNDP “National Adaptation Plan to advance medium and long-term adaptation planning in Armenia” project Authors National experts: Liana Margaryan, Aleksandr Arakelyan, Edgar Misakyan, Olympia Geghamyan, Davit Zakaryan, Zara Ohanjanyan International consultant: Soroosh Sorooshian 2 Content List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 1. ANALYSIS OF POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF WATER SECTOR AND IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS AND BARRIERS IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ............................. 19 Summary of Chapter 1 .......................................................................................................................... 19 1.1 The concept and criteria of water resources adaptation to climate change .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008
    Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008 June 2008 - N°499/2 Mission in Armenia, 29 March to 3 April 2008 FOREWORD Alerted by both the "Democracy in Armenia" group and the Civil Society Institute (an FIDH affiliate) to the violent repression that followed the presidential elections in this country in February 2008, the undersigned lawyers and jurist were mandated by the President of the Paris Bar Association (M. le Bâtonnier de l’Ordre des Avocats de Paris) and the International Union of Lawyers (l’Union Internationale des Avocats) on one hand and, on the other hand, the FIDH (International Federation of Human Rights). The mission visited Yerevan from 29 March to 3 April to report on the situation of the right to defend oneself and the right to freedoms in the Republic of ARMENIA following the events that took place in February and March 2008. INTRODUCTION Before considering the legal and juridical context of the mission's work, it is appropriate to recall some chronological milestones to put into perspective the current situation in Armenia and its evolution, seventeen years after the independence of the Republic of Armenia was proclaimed in the Southern Caucasus. - 21 September, 1991: the Republic of Armenia becomes independent following a referendum. - October 1991: Election by universal suffrage of Mr. Levon TER-PETROSIAN, who becomes the first President of the Republic of Armenia. - 1992-1994: Fighting in the autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh between the opposing Armenian self- defence forces and the Azerbaijan armed forces. A cease-fire comes into force on 14 May 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoinfo EIA Completion Report.Pdf
    ADDITIONAL SUPPORT TO FORMAL ADOPTION OF THE RBMP FOR AKHURYAN RBD OF ARMENIA, INCLUDING EIA AND EXPERT EXAMINATION COMPLETION REPORT Prepared by: “Geoinfo” LLC September 9, 2016 List of acronyms BMO Basin Management Organization CWME Country Water Management Expert EIA Environmental Impact Analysis EPIRB Environmental Protection of International River Basins EU European Union IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management KFW German Reconstruction Credit Bank LLC Limited Liability Company MES Ministry of Emergency Situations MNP Ministry of Nature Protection NGO Non-Governmental Organization RBD River Basin District RBMP River Basin Management Plan ROA Republic of Armenia SNCO Sate Non-Commercial Organization WRMA Water Resources Management Agency 2 ADDITIONAL SUPPORT TO THE FORMAL ADOPTION OF THE RBMP FOR AKHURYAN RBD OF ARMENIA, INCLUDING EIA AND EXPERT EXAMINATION This report is prepared according to the requirements of the contracts signed between Hulla & Co Human Dynamics KG and “Geoinfo” LLC on May 30, 2016. The overall objective of the contract was to provide additional support to the formal adoption of the RBMP for Akhuryan RBD of Armenia, including environmental impact assessment and expert examination. The report includes the following 2 deliverables as envisaged in the contract: Deliverable 1: Proceedings of two public hearing meetings: (i) on preliminary assessment of the RBMP for Akhuryan RBD; and (ii) on strategic assessment/environmental impact assessment of the RBMP for Akhuryan RBD; Deliverable 2: Preliminary environmental impact assessment report and primary impact assessment report for RBMP of Akhuryan RBD. The procedures of environmental impact assessment and expert examination of the RBMP for Akhuryan RBD of Armenia and corresponding public hearings are regulated by the Republic of Armenia law “On Environmental Impact Assessment and Expert Examination” (2014) and Government of Armenia Resolution “On Procedures of Public Notification and Public Discussions” (2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Brachytron 13 (1/2)
    New finds of ‘critical’ species of Odonata in Armenia – Onychogomphus assimilis and Libellula pontica V. Ananian The latest review of the Odonatofauna of through the Caucasus and Iran to Turkmenistan. Armenia (TAILLY ET AL., 2004) has briefly The species inhabits mountain streams, often outlined both past and recent research on the in wooded environment (DUMONT ET AL., 1992; dragonflies of the country and has presented an BOUDOT, 2006; DIJKSTRA & LEWINGTON, 2006). updated checklist for the country. Two species Libellula pontica has a similar distribution pattern, in the checklist - Onychogomphus assimilis and but is reaching farther south to Israel and Jordan Libellula pontica - were lacking recent records and east to Kyrgyzstan. It is found in river valleys and had not been observed in Armenia since with slow flowing waters of natural and artificial their last observation half a century ago. Both origin richly fringed with reed (DUMONT 1991; species have a West Asiatic biogeographic DIJKSTRA & LEWINGTON 2006; KALKMAN 2006). affinity (AKRAMOWSKI, 1948, 1964; DUMONT ET AL. 1992). Onychogomphus assimilis is distributed Published data of Onychogomphus assimilis from the eastern Mediterranean coast eastwards from Armenia comprise two records from Syunik Figure 1. Map showing locations mentioned in the text with historical and recent records of Onychogomphus assimilis and Libellula pontica from Armenia. 36 Table 1. Records of Onychogomphus assimilis and Libellula pontica from Armenia. For each record, the number of individuals, the date, the location with coordinates, the altitude, the kind of habitat and the source is given. Legend: - no information is available, * years of collection not specified in the source. Coordinates Altitude Species Number recorded Date Location Province (decimal (m Habitat Source degrees) a.s.l.) Vayots Akramowski Onychogomphus assimilis 1 male, 2 females 6-9.vii.* Vaik town 39.69N, 45.47E 1240 Arpa River Dzor 1948 Akramowski Onychogomphus assimilis 1 male 13.vi.* Getap vill.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report April - June 2016
    QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL - JUNE 2016 PREPARED BY MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR TABLE OF CONTENT 1. COMMERCIAL DIRECTORATE .................. 4 2. OPERATIONAL DIRECTORATE ................. 8 3. WATER REMOVAL DIRECTORATE ........ 32 4. ADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL DIRECTORATE ................................................ 38 5. INTERNAL CONTROL DIRECTORATE .... 43 6. HUMAN RESEOURCE DIRECTORATE .... 47 7. QUALITY, SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT ................................................. 50 8. PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT ....... 53 9. INVESTMENT PROGRAMS COORDINATION DIRECTORATE ................ 55 10. INDICATORS ............................................. 72 11. APPENDIX ................................................ 83 COMMERCIAL DIRECTORATE 1.1 Billing and revenue ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Customers service center .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Installation of new high quality water meters is over. About 40 000 water meters ( about 32 000 resi- dent-customers) were installed. Research proves that the program is justified and old water meters must be replaced with “C” class water meters. Below is the result of installed new water meters in Abovyan, Hrazdan and Ashtarak towns. Table 1 Number of Average consumption Average consumption customers with old water meters with new water meters Hrazdan 2 423 6.6
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]