DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment Report Armenia: North-South Road

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Environmental Assessment Report Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Document Stage: Draft Sub-project Number: 42145 August 2010 Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 Prepared by Ministry of Transport and Communications (MOTC) of Armenia for Asian Development Bank The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 – Environmental Impact Assessment Report ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank AARM ADB Armenian Resident Mission CO2 carbon dioxide EA executing agency EARF environmental assessment and review framework EIA environmental impact assessment EMP environmental management and monitoring plan IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MFF multi-tranche financing facility MNP Ministry of Nature Protection MOC Ministry of Culture MOH Ministry of Health MOTC Ministry of Transport and Communication NGO nongovernment organization NO2 nitrogen dioxide NO nitrogen oxide MPC maximum permissible concentration NPE Nature Protection Expertise NSS National Statistical Service PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PMU Project Management Unit PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RA Republic of Armenia RAMSAR Ramsar Convention on Wetlands REA Rapid Environmental Assessment (checklist) SEI State Environmental Inspectorate SNCO State Non-commercial Organization SO2 sulfur dioxide SPS Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) TOR terms of reference UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization WEIGHTS AND MEASURES dBA decibel (A-weighted) km kilometer(s) km2 square kilometer(s) m meter(s) mg/m3 milligram(s) per cubic meter µg/m3 microgram(s) per cubic meter GLOSSARY baird castle (e.g., Zakari) marz province marzpet provincial governor tuff volcanic rock NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 – Environmental Impact Assessment Report CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………. 4 II. POLICY, LEGAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ………………………………..… 5 A. Asian Development Bank Policy on Environment Protection ………………………..… 5 1. ADB Environmental Protection Requirements…………………………………..… 5 2. Specific Procedures for MFF Sub-projects………………………………………… 6 B. National Institutional Framework……………………………………………….……..……7 C. Armenian Laws Governing Environmental Management and Assessment…………... 7 D. Responsibilities and Authorities…………………………………………………….….… 11 E. Armenia’s Participation in International Environmental Conventions and Protocols.. 12 III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT …………………………………………………..……… 14 A. Type of Project………………………………………………………………………….…. 14 B. Magnitude of Operation ……………………………………………………………….…. 14 C. Project Description………………………………………………………….…….….…… 15 D. Economic Development & Social and Cultural Resources………………….…….….. 16 1. Economic Development………………………………………………………….….16 2. Social and Cultural Resources……………………………………………..……… 16 IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT (BASELINE DATA) ……………………………..18 A. Geographical Location and Relief……………………………………………………..… 18 B. Geology and Seismology………………………………… …………………………..….. 18 C. Climate, Air Quality, and Noise………. ………………………….………………..……. 19 1. Climate……………………………………………………………………………….. 19 2. Air Quality………………………………………………………………….………... 19 3. Greenhouse Gas Emissions…………………………………………………….….20 4. Noise…………………………………………………………………………….….…21 D. Hydrology and Water Quality………………………………………………….…………..24 1. Hydrology……………………………………………………………….….…….….. 24 2. Water Quality ………………………………………………………….…..…..…... 26 3. Soils, Erosion, and Land Contamination………………………………………… 28 E. Biodiversity…………………………………………………………………………..…….. 29 1. Flora………………………………………………………………………………...... 29 2. Fauna……………………………………………………………………….……..…. 32 F. Environmental Protected Areas and Nature Monuments………..………………….… 32 G. Environmental Hot Spots……………………………………………………………….… 32 H. Archaeology & Historical, Natural, and Cultural Monuments……………………….… 34 V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, IMPACTS ON PCR, AND MITIGATION MEASURES….. 45 A. Impacts Due to Location………………………….…………………………………..…. 48 B. Impacts Related to Design………………………………………………………………. 48 C. Impacts During Construction…….…….………………………………………………... 49 D. Impacts Related to Operations……………………………………………………..…… 52 E. Cumulative Environmental Effects……………………………………………………… 52 Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 – Environmental Impact Assessment Report VI. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRE-DESIGN …………………………………………………….. 53 VII. INFORMATION DISCLOSURES, CONSULTATION, AND PARTICIPATION ………….…62 A Stakeholder Meetings ……………………………………………………………………. 62 B. Information Disclosure……………………………………………………………..……… 63 C. Public Consultations……………………………………………………………….……... 64 VIII. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND REDRESS MECHANISM………………………………..72 IX. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ………………………………………………..… 75 X. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS …………………………………………..….. 76 A. Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………………..… 76 B. Recommendations ……………………………………………………………...………… 76 XI. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………….…………..….…… 77 ANNEXES 1 Rapid Environmental Assessment Checklist 2 Wetland Specialist’s report 3 Ornithology report 4 Botany report 5 Zoology report 6 Archaeology report 7 Noise monitoring data 8 Air quality test results 9 Water quality test results (project sampling and Armecomonitoring data) 10 1st Public Consultation (advertisements, attendance lists and sheets, handout) 11 2nd Public Consultation (advertisements, attendance lists and sheets, handout) 12 Proposed Re-alignments (Presentation to PMU) 13 EMP (management plan and monitoring plan) ATTACHMENTS One CD that contains this report, its annexes, and a detailed archaeological survey of the entire 88.4 km route in 9 separate files. Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 – Environmental Impact Assessment Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Project The Government of Armenia is implementing the North-South Road Corridor Program in order to upgrade the transportation links with its neighbors Iran and Georgia to international standards. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is assisting the Ministry of Transportation and Communication (MOTC) with a multi-tranche financing facility (MFF) to undertake the North-South Road Corridor MFF Investment Program. The project consists of upgrading about 88 km 2-lane road from Ashtarak to Gyumri to a 4-lane divided highway. For budgetary reasons, the project will be split into Tranche 2 (about 40 km from Ashtarak to Talin) and Tranche 3 (about 44 km from Talin to Gyumri). Most of the alignment parallels the existing road but some is separated by as much as 330 m. The pre-design alignment crosses one important wetland and 15 gorges, 7 of which contain streams. According to ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009), constructing a highway on new alignment usually classifies the project as environment category “A”, which requires that an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report is posted on the ADB website for at least 120 days prior to Board Consideration. This project is environment category “A”. EA and IA The Ministry of Transport and Communication (MOTC) is the Executing Agency (EA). For its Implementing Agency (IA), the EA has decided to combine the customary PMU and PIU (Program Preparatory and Management Unit and Project Implementation Unit) into one PMU, a Project Management Unit, headed by a very experienced director. At the time of EIA report preparation, the PMU consisted of the director, an assistant, and two unit heads (technical and safeguards) and recruitment for the remainder of the 23- person PMU was underway. On 9 July, PMU staff indicated that the total number in the unit was 17, including a person in charge of public relations, but without environmental and archaeological specialists in the PMU's safeguard unit. The governing council has given its non-objection for posting the EIA on ADB's website by letter of 2 August 2010. The EIA Because of time constraints and the EA’s and PMU’s relative inexperience with ADB’s safeguard requirements, an EIA team funded by ADB was fielded on 4 May 2010. The team consisted of one international ADB staff consultant (environmental engineer) and nine national specialists (environmentalist, botanist, zoologist, ornithologist, wetland expert, archaeologist, GIS expert, and two GIS surveyors). The investigations, mapping, and report were substantially completed in 70 calendar days, with another 22 days added for internal review and revisions. The report was translated into Armenian and the non-objection to post the report on the ADB website was received from the MOTC. The EIA covers both tranches. 1/3 Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 – Environmental Impact Assessment Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ecology This EIA has determined that except for one important wetland, which requires special protection measures, the impact on the environment – sparse flora and fauna - is relatively benign and can be mitigated through routine design changes and construction measures that are summarized in the Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (EMP). There are, however, areas in which endangered and critically endangered Red Book species have been found.
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Genetic Characteristic of Dinucleotide Microsatellite Loci in Parthenogenetic Lizards Darevskia Unisexualis A

    Molecular Genetic Characteristic of Dinucleotide Microsatellite Loci in Parthenogenetic Lizards Darevskia Unisexualis A

    ISSN 1022-7954, Russian Journal of Genetics, 2009, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 203–210. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2009 Original Russian Text © A.V. Omelchenko, V.I. Korchagin, G.A. Sevast’yanova, A.P. Ryskov, O.N. Tokarskaya, 2009, published in Genetika, 2009, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 230–238. ANIMAL GENETICS Molecular Genetic Characteristic of Dinucleotide Microsatellite Loci in Parthenogenetic Lizards Darevskia unisexualis A. V. Omelchenkoa,b, V. I. Korchagina, G. A. Sevast’yanovab, A. P. Ryskova, and O. N. Tokarskayaa aInstitute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334 Russia; e-mail: [email protected] bMoscow Pedagogical State Univrsity, Moscow, 119882 Russia; e-mail: [email protected] Received April 14, 2008; in final form, July 30, 2008 Abstract—In the present study, the first molecular genetic investigation of dinucleotide (GT)n microsatellite loci in parthenogenetic lizards Darevskia unisexualis was performed. New polymorphic locus, Du214, (GenBank Ac. No. EU252542) was identified and characterized in detail. It was demonstrated that allele of this locus differed in the size and structure of microsatellite locus, as well as in point mutations, the combinations of which enabled the isola- tion of stabile fixed double nucleotide substitutions A–A (alleles 2 and 4) and G–T (alleles 1, 3, 5, and 6). Double nucleotide substitutions described were also identified in the orthlogous loci of the parental species genomes, D. rad- dei (G–T) and D. valentine (A–A). Based on the analysis of allele distribution pattern at this locus in all populations of parthenospecies D. unisexualis, mathematic model was elaborated and realized.
  • Akhuryan Basin Management Area KEY WATER ISSUES

    Akhuryan Basin Management Area KEY WATER ISSUES

    ARMENIA Akhuryan Basin Management Area KEY WATER ISSUES EEnvi ronmenPt al Pr otectioIn of IntRe rnati onal RivBe r Basin s The project is funded This project is implemented by a consortium by the European Union led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG The Environmental Protection of International River Basins (EPIRB) project aims to improve the quality of water in transboundary river basins in the wider Black Sea region and Belarus, including Armenia. One of the specific objectives is to improve technical capacities by developing river basin management plans (RBMPs) in selected pilot river basins, according to the requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). One of the selected pilot basins is the Akhuryan basin management area, which includes the Akhuryan River basin, located in the western part of the Republic of Armenia, and the Metsamor River basin, which is adjacent to the Akhuryan River basin. 2 Good water status The Water Framework Directive is achieved when pollution is and river basin management plans controlled and there is One of the requirements of the WFD is the achievement and sufficient flow for ecosystems preservation of good water status by managing waters in natural to function and survive. units — that is, in river basins. River basin planning follows a structured approach: finding out facts, deciding on necessary actions, making a management plan, and putting the plan into practice. An important first step is to identify significant water management issues so that appropriate solutions and measures can be developed. The impacts of human activities Human activities can lead to serious problems in terms of both water quality and quantity.
  • Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf

    Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf

    1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES.....................................................................................................................................................
  • 5 Environmental Examination

    5 Environmental Examination

    5 ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EXAMINATION FOR RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT SEWAGE SYSTEMS IN RA 5-1 Environmental Examination for Cultural Properties (1/2) Nos. of Nos. of Community cultural Rating Community cultural Rating properties properties ARAGATSOTN MARZ Akunq 9 D Lusagyugh 10 D Aghdzq 9 D Tsaghkahovit 5 D Antarut 3 D Tsaghkashen 2 D Ashnak 16 D Tsilqar 6 D Avan+Khnusik 36 D Katnaghbyur 10 D Avtona 13 D Karmrashen 13 D Aragats (Aparan district) 12 D Kaqavadzor 9 D Arayi 6 D Hartavan 15 D Arteni 1 D Dzoraglukh 14 D Apnagyugh 10 D Dzoragyugh 3 D Baysz 4 D Meliqgyugh 3 D Byurakan 40 D Miraq 4 D Garnahovit 10 D Mulqi 2 D Geghadir 1 D Nigavan 9 D Gegharot 11 D Norashen (Aparan district) 8 D Norashen (Aragats Davtashen 5 D District) 2 D Dian 4 D Shenavan 4 D Yeghipartush 8 D Shgharshik 2 D Yeghnik 10 D Vosketas 2 D Yernjatap 14 D Chqnagh 6 D Zovasar 3 D Vardenis 14 D Ttujur 7 D Vardenut 5 D Irind 6 D Verin Sasunik 18 D Lernapar 4 D Tegher 2 D Lernarot 24 D Orgov 24 D SHIRAK MARZ Alvar 3 D Krasar 6 D Aghvorik 2 D Hovit 11 D Ardenis 3 D Dzorashen 1 D Arpeni 6 D Mets Sariar 3 D Bandivan 14 D Musaelyan 19 D Bashgyugh 8 D Shaghik 3 D Garnaritch + Yeghnajur 4 D Shirak 2 D Kamkhut 2 D Pemzashen 12 D Lernakert 12 D Jajur 4 D Lernut 4 D Jrarat 18 D Tsaghkut 5 D Sarnaghbyur 45 D Kamo 12 D Sarapat 2 D Karmrakar 10 D Sizavet 1 D Kaqavasar 3 D Tzoghamarg 8 D Krashen 2 D Poqr Sariar 2 D Source: The Study Team (2007) EE-1-1/2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EXAMINATION FOR RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT SEWAGE SYSTEMS IN RA 5-1 Environmental Examination for Cultural Properties (2/2) Nos.
  • A Study on Fauna of the Shahdagh National Park

    A Study on Fauna of the Shahdagh National Park

    J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci. , 5(10)11-15, 2015 ISSN: 2090-4274 Journal of Applied Environmental © 2015, TextRoad Publication and Biological Sciences www.textroad.com A Study on fauna of the Shahdagh National Park S.M. Guliyev Institute of Zoology of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Pass.1128, block 504, Baku, AZ 1073, Azerbaijan Received: June 2, 2015 Accepted: August 27, 2015 ABSTRACT The paper contains information about mammals and insects entered the Red Book of Azerbaijanand the Red List of IUCN distributed in the Azerbaijan territories of the Greater Caucasus (South and North slopes). Researche carried out in the 2008-2012 years. It can be noted that from 43 species of mammals and 76 species of insects entering the Red Book of Azerbaijan 23 ones of mammals ( Rhinolophus hipposideros Bechstein, 1800, Myotis bechsteinii Kunhl, 1817, M.emarqinatus Geoffroy, 1806, M.blythii Tomas, 1875, Barbastella barbastella Scheber, 1774, Barbastella leucomelas Cretzchmar, 1826, Eptesicus bottae Peters, 1869, Hystrix indica Kerr, 1792, Micromys minutus Pollas, 1771, Chionomys gud Satunin,1909, Hyaena hyaena Linnaeus, 1758, Ursus arctos (Linnaeus, 1758), Martes martes (Linnaeus, 1758), Mustela (Mustela) erminea , 1758, Lutra lutra (Linnaeus, 1758), Telus (Chaus) Chaus Gued., 1776, Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758), Pantherapardus (Linnaeus, 1758), Rupicara rupicapra (Linnaeus, 1758), Capreolus capreolus (Linnaeus, 1758), Cervus elaphus maral (Ogilbi, 1840), Capra cylindricornis Bulth, 1840) and 15 species of insects ( Carabus (Procerus) caucasicus
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus

    Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus

    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
  • Darevskia Raddei and Darevskia Portschinskii) May Not Lead to Hybridization Between Them

    Darevskia Raddei and Darevskia Portschinskii) May Not Lead to Hybridization Between Them

    Zoologischer Anzeiger 288 (2020) 43e52 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Zoologischer Anzeiger journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcz Research paper Syntopy of two species of rock lizards (Darevskia raddei and Darevskia portschinskii) may not lead to hybridization between them * Eduard Galoyan a, b, , Viktoria Moskalenko b, Mariam Gabelaia c, David Tarkhnishvili c, Victor Spangenberg d, Anna Chamkina b, Marine Arakelyan e a Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, 33 Leninskij Prosp. 119071, Moscow, Russia b Zoological Museum, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia c Center of Biodiversity Studies, Institute of Ecology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia d Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia e Department of Zoology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia article info abstract Article history: The two species of rock lizards, Darevsia raddei and Darevskia portschinskii, belong to two different Received 19 February 2020 phylogenetic clades of the same genus. They are supposed ancestors for the hybrid parthenogenetic, Received in revised form Darevskia rostombekowi. The present study aims to identify morphological features of these two species 22 June 2020 and the potential gene introgression between them in the area of sympatry. External morphological Accepted 30 June 2020 features provided the evidence of specific morphology in D. raddei and D. portschinskii: the species Available online 14 July 2020 differed in scalation and ventral coloration pattern, however, they had some proportional similarities Corresponding Editor: Alexander Kupfer within both sexes of the two species. Males of both species had relatively larger heads and shorter bodies than females. Males of D. raddei were slightly larger than males of D.
  • Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk

    Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk

    Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development of the Republic of Armenia DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IDEAS GORIS, TEGH, GORHAYK, MEGHRI, VAYK, JERMUK, ZARITAP, URTSADZOR, NOYEMBERYAN, KOGHB, AYRUM, SARAPAT, AMASIA, ASHOTSK, ARPI Expert Team Varazdat Karapetyan Artyom Grigoryan Artak Dadoyan Gagik Muradyan GIZ Coordinator Armen Keshishyan September 2016 List of Acronyms MTAD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund GIZ German Technical Cooperation LoGoPro GIZ Local Government Programme LSG Local Self-government (bodies) (FY)MDP Five-year Municipal Development Plan PACA Participatory Assessment of Competitive Advantages RDF «Regional Development Foundation» Company LED Local economic development 2 Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................. 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Approaches to Project Implementation ..................................................................................
  • Shirak Guidebook

    Shirak Guidebook

    Wuthering Heights of Shirak -the Land of Steppe and Sky YYerevanerevan 22013013 1 Facts About Shirak FOREWORD Mix up the vast open spaces of the Shirak steppe, the wuthering wind that sweeps through its heights, the snowcapped tops of Mt. Aragats and the dramatic gorges and sparkling lakes of Akhurian River. Sprinkle in the white sheep fl ocks and the cry of an eagle. Add churches, mysterious Urartian ruins, abundant wildlife and unique architecture. Th en top it all off with a turbulent history, Gyumri’s joi de vivre and Gurdjieff ’s mystical teaching, revealing a truly magnifi cent region fi lled with experi- ences to last you a lifetime. However, don’t be deceived that merely seeing all these highlights will give you a complete picture of what Shirak really is. Dig deeper and you’ll be surprised to fi nd that your fondest memories will most likely lie with the locals themselves. You’ll eas- ily be touched by these proud, witt y, and legendarily hospitable people, even if you cannot speak their language. Only when you meet its remarkable people will you understand this land and its powerful energy which emanates from their sculptures, paintings, music and poetry. Visiting the province takes creativity and imagination, as the tourist industry is at best ‘nascent’. A great deal of the current tourist fl ow consists of Diasporan Armenians seeking the opportunity to make personal contributions to their historic homeland, along with a few scatt ered independent travelers. Although there are some rural “rest- places” and picnic areas, they cater mainly to locals who want to unwind with hearty feasts and family chats, thus rarely providing any activities.
  • Ra Shirak Marz

    Ra Shirak Marz

    RA SHIRAK MARZ 251 RA SHIRAK MARZ Marz center – Gyumri town Territories - Artik, Akhuryan, Ani, Amasia and Ashotsk Towns - Gyumri, Artik, Maralik RA Shirak marz is situated in the north-west of the republic. In the West it borders with Turkey, in the North it borders with Georgia, in the East – RA Lori marz and in the South – RA Aragatsotn marz. Territory 2681 square km. Territory share of the marz in the territory of RA 9 % Urban communities 3 Rural communities 116 Towns 3 Villages 128 Population number as of January 1, 2006 281.4 ths. persons including urban 171.4 ths. persons rural 110.0 ths. persons Share of urban population size 60.9 % Share of marz population size in RA population size, 2005 39.1 % Agricultural land 165737 ha including - arable land 84530 ha Being at the height of 1500-2000 m above sea level (52 villages of the marz are at the height of 1500-1700 m above sea level and 55 villages - 2000 m), the marz is the coldest region 0 of Armenia, where the air temperature sometimes reaches -46 C in winter. The main railway and automobile highway connecting Armenia with Georgia pass through the marz territory. The railway and motor-road networks of Armenia and Turkey are connected here. On the Akhuryan river frontier with Turkey the Akhuryan reservoir was built that is the biggest in the country by its volume of 526 mln. m3. Marzes of the Republic of Armenia in figures, 1998-2002 252 The leading branches of industry of RA Shirak marz are production of food, including beverages and production of other non-metal mineral products.
  • Stocktaking Exercise to Identify Legal, Institutional, Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Gaps and Barriers in Water Resour

    Stocktaking Exercise to Identify Legal, Institutional, Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Gaps and Barriers in Water Resour

    “National Adaptation Plan to advance medium and long-term adaptation planning in Armenia” UNDP-GCF Project Stocktaking exercise to identify legal, institutional, vulnerability assessment and adaptation gaps and barriers in water resources management under climate change conditions Prepared by “Geoinfo” LLC Contract Number: RFP 088/2019 YEREVAN 2020 Produced by GeoInfo, Ltd., Charents 1, Yerevan, Armenia Action coordinated by Vahagn Tonoyan Date 11.06.2020 Version Final Produced for UNDP Climate Change Program Financed by: GCF-UNDP “National Adaptation Plan to advance medium and long-term adaptation planning in Armenia” project Authors National experts: Liana Margaryan, Aleksandr Arakelyan, Edgar Misakyan, Olympia Geghamyan, Davit Zakaryan, Zara Ohanjanyan International consultant: Soroosh Sorooshian 2 Content List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 1. ANALYSIS OF POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF WATER SECTOR AND IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS AND BARRIERS IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ............................. 19 Summary of Chapter 1 .......................................................................................................................... 19 1.1 The concept and criteria of water resources adaptation to climate change .................................
  • On Two Previously Undescribed Subspecies of Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) from Greece

    On Two Previously Undescribed Subspecies of Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) from Greece

    46 ENTOMOLOGISCHE BERICHTEN, DEEL 36, 1.III. 1976 On two previously undescribed subspecies of Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) from Greece by J. BROWN ABSTRACT Two new subspecies of Plebejus pylaon Fischer and Agrodiaetus ripartii Freyer are described from Greece. Their occurrence in Greece is described as far as possible. The following presents the descriptions of two poorly known subspecies of Lycaenids which fly in Greece. The distribution of both subspecies seems to follow well established zoogeograph- ical patterns: for example, the distribution of Plebejus pylaon brethertoni which is given below closely resembles the known distribution of Colias aurorina heldreichi Staudinger. Plebejus pylaon brethertoni ssp. nov. DESCRIPTION Male. Upperside with a deep violet blue ground colour; marginal black borders narrow (a- bout 0.5 mm wide) and extend 2—3 mm basad along veins. Usually, 2—3 black antemarginal spots at anal angle of hindwing. Length of forewing 15.5—17.5 mm. Underside with a pale grey ground colour, almost steely grey. Submarginal markings as in P. pylaon trappi Verity and usual¬ ly, a well marked white shade between the postdiscal spots and orange lunules, especially on the hindwing. Female. Upperside ground colour dark brown; marginal black borders linears or vestigeal. Hindwing with 3—6 orange submarginal lunules, each with a black antemarginal spot. 50% of females show 2—4 submarginal orange lunules on their forewing. Length of forewing 15—18 mm. Underside ground colour pale coffee brown, although sometimes darker. Orange submar¬ ginal lunules well developed on both wings. Otherwise as in male. Material examined. Holotype <3 (forewing length 16.5 mm), Mt.