A Study on Fauna of the Shahdagh National Park
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Book Section Reprint the STRUGGLE for TROGLODYTES1
The RELICT HOMINOID INQUIRY 6:33-170 (2017) Book Section Reprint THE STRUGGLE FOR TROGLODYTES1 Boris Porshnev "I have no doubt that some fact may appear fantastic and incredible to many of my readers. For example, did anyone believe in the existence of Ethiopians before seeing any? Isn't anything seen for the first time astounding? How many things are thought possible only after they have been achieved?" (Pliny, Natural History of Animals, Vol. VII, 1) INTRODUCTION BERNARD HEUVELMANS Doctor in Zoological Sciences How did I come to study animals, and from the study of animals known to science, how did I go on to that of still undiscovered animals, and finally, more specifically to that of unknown humans? It's a long story. For me, everything started a long time ago, so long ago that I couldn't say exactly when. Of course it happened gradually. Actually – I have said this often – one is born a zoologist, one does not become one. However, for the discipline to which I finally ended up fully devoting myself, it's different: one becomes a cryptozoologist. Let's specify right now that while Cryptozoology is, etymologically, "the science of hidden animals", it is in practice the study and research of animal species whose existence, for lack of a specimen or of sufficient anatomical fragments, has not been officially recognized. I should clarify what I mean when I say "one is born a zoologist. Such a congenital vocation would imply some genetic process, such as that which leads to a lineage of musicians or mathematicians. -
Environmental Assessment Report Armenia: North-South Road
Environmental Assessment Report Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Document Stage: Draft Sub-project Number: 42145 August 2010 Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 Prepared by Ministry of Transport and Communications (MOTC) of Armenia for Asian Development Bank The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 – Environmental Impact Assessment Report ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank AARM ADB Armenian Resident Mission CO2 carbon dioxide EA executing agency EARF environmental assessment and review framework EIA environmental impact assessment EMP environmental management and monitoring plan IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MFF multi-tranche financing facility MNP Ministry of Nature Protection MOC Ministry of Culture MOH Ministry of Health MOTC Ministry of Transport and Communication NGO nongovernment organization NO2 nitrogen dioxide NO nitrogen oxide MPC maximum permissible concentration NPE Nature Protection Expertise NSS National Statistical Service PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PMU Project Management Unit PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RA Republic of Armenia RAMSAR Ramsar Convention on Wetlands REA Rapid Environmental Assessment (checklist) SEI State Environmental Inspectorate -
Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) 2020 Azerbaijan
Report Azerbaijan Rome, 2020 FRA 2020 report, Azerbaijan FAO has been monitoring the world's forests at 5 to 10 year intervals since 1946. The Global Forest Resources Assessments (FRA) are now produced every five years in an attempt to provide a consistent approach to describing the world's forests and how they are changing. The FRA is a country-driven process and the assessments are based on reports prepared by officially nominated National Correspondents. If a report is not available, the FRA Secretariat prepares a desk study using earlier reports, existing information and/or remote sensing based analysis. This document was generated automatically using the report made available as a contribution to the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020, and submitted to FAO as an official government document. The content and the views expressed in this report are the responsibility of the entity submitting the report to FAO. FAO cannot be held responsible for any use made of the information contained in this document. 2 FRA 2020 report, Azerbaijan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1. Forest extent, characteristics and changes 2. Forest growing stock, biomass and carbon 3. Forest designation and management 4. Forest ownership and management rights 5. Forest disturbances 6. Forest policy and legislation 7. Employment, education and NWFP 8. Sustainable Development Goal 15 3 FRA 2020 report, Azerbaijan Introduction Report preparation and contact persons The present report was prepared by the following person(s) Name Role Email Tables (old contact) Sadig Salmanov Collaborator [email protected] All Sadig Salmanov National correspondent [email protected] All Introductory text Forests are considered to be one of the most valuable natural resources of Azerbaijan that integrate soil, water, trees, bushes, vegetation, wildlife, and microorganisms which mutually affect each other from biological viewpoint in the course of development. -
On Two Previously Undescribed Subspecies of Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) from Greece
46 ENTOMOLOGISCHE BERICHTEN, DEEL 36, 1.III. 1976 On two previously undescribed subspecies of Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) from Greece by J. BROWN ABSTRACT Two new subspecies of Plebejus pylaon Fischer and Agrodiaetus ripartii Freyer are described from Greece. Their occurrence in Greece is described as far as possible. The following presents the descriptions of two poorly known subspecies of Lycaenids which fly in Greece. The distribution of both subspecies seems to follow well established zoogeograph- ical patterns: for example, the distribution of Plebejus pylaon brethertoni which is given below closely resembles the known distribution of Colias aurorina heldreichi Staudinger. Plebejus pylaon brethertoni ssp. nov. DESCRIPTION Male. Upperside with a deep violet blue ground colour; marginal black borders narrow (a- bout 0.5 mm wide) and extend 2—3 mm basad along veins. Usually, 2—3 black antemarginal spots at anal angle of hindwing. Length of forewing 15.5—17.5 mm. Underside with a pale grey ground colour, almost steely grey. Submarginal markings as in P. pylaon trappi Verity and usual¬ ly, a well marked white shade between the postdiscal spots and orange lunules, especially on the hindwing. Female. Upperside ground colour dark brown; marginal black borders linears or vestigeal. Hindwing with 3—6 orange submarginal lunules, each with a black antemarginal spot. 50% of females show 2—4 submarginal orange lunules on their forewing. Length of forewing 15—18 mm. Underside ground colour pale coffee brown, although sometimes darker. Orange submar¬ ginal lunules well developed on both wings. Otherwise as in male. Material examined. Holotype <3 (forewing length 16.5 mm), Mt. -
1 Mission Report SUBMITTED BY: İsmail Belen, TCDC Consultant For
Mission Report SUBMITTED BY: İsmail Belen, TCDC Consultant for Public Awareness and Training, CEM/MoFWA, Turkey COUNTRIES VISITED: Azerbaijan DATES OF MISSION: 21-25 July 2014 DATE OF REPORT: 2 August 2014 1 Contents List of Pictures ................................................................................................................................ 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 4 Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Background and purpose................................................................................................................. 6 Daily Programmes .......................................................................................................................... 8 21 July 2014 Monday...................................................................................................................... 8 22 July 2014 Tuesday ..................................................................................................................... 8 Prepatory Meeting ........................................................................................................................... 8 Meeting With Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources ............................................................ 9 Visiting to FAO Office ................................................................................................................ -
Forest Dependency in Rural Azerbaijan
Forest Dependency in Rural Azerbaijan Based on the Case Study in Zagatala district Baku, October 2014 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi-fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES II ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction i) Forests and forest use in your Azerbaijan ii) Rationale 2. Methodology i) Study area ii) Method of sampling iii) Number of households iv) Timeline v) Field implementation and problems vi) Local unit conversion (incl. from key informant interview) 3. Study area characteristics i) Brief history of villages ii) Demographics iii) Infrastructure availability iv) Economic data v) Major economic activities vi) Seasonal calendar: vii) Major markets and market access viii) Major land cover and land uses ix) Description of conservation areas x) Tenure and governance xi) Government and other development/conservation projects xii) Calamities xiii) Other relevant issues 4. Results and discussion i) Income share by source ii) Frequency and value of forest products a. Fuelwood iii) Cash and subsistence of forest products iv) RFI over income quintiles v) RFI over asset groups vi) Most Important Products 5. Conclusion 6. References 1 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES: Table 1: Seasonal calendar Figure 1: Income share by source Figure 2: Frequency of forest product collected Figure 3: Forest products by value Figure 4: Cash and subsistence of forest products Figure 5: RFI over income quintiles Figure 6: RFI over asset groups Figure 7, 8: Most Important Products 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction In the Republic of Azerbaijan forested areas cover 1,021 hectares of the land, which is 11.8% of the country’s territory. -
Capacity Building in Sharing Forest and Market Information”
Workshop “ Capacity Building in Sharing Forest and Market Information” 24 – 28 October 2005, Prague and Křtiny, Czech Republic Country statement Azerbaijan Forest Resources Assessment for Sustainable Forest Management Mr. SADIG SALMANOV Main Specialist Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources Baghramyan 3 AM 375002 Jerevan Azerbaijan Evaluation of Inexhaustible Forest Resources Management in Azerbaijan a) Brief review on forest resources Azerbaijan has got 1 214 000 km 2 of forest lands, which makes 11,4 % of its whole area. Among these 1 000 035 ha are proper forests and 989 000 ha are covered with forests but of irregular consistency. The forests are distributed as follows: Grand Caucasus 49%; Small Caucasus – 34%; Talish Mountains – 15%; Lowlands – 2%. The forests are an integral part of the ecosystem of Azerbaijan. They are generally related to the 1s t group. However, they play a significant role not only in climate forming processes, prevention of desertification, decrease of natural diversity, and greenhouse effect, but also help solve social, economic and cultural problems. Due to territorial heterogeneity and complicated landscape, trees and shrubs can grow as high as 20002200 metres above the sea level. It also accounts for the great diversity of plant life. 435 wood and shrubs species grow in our republic, of which 107 wood and 288 shrub species are widespread and cover large areas. Eastern beech (Fagus orientalis) plays an important role in forming of forest stands. It can be met on 32% of the forest land. Oak (Quercus) is a frequent tree species in both hilly and plain regions and occupies 31,5% of the forest area. -
ATALANTA, Bd. IX, Heft 3, September 1978, Würzburg Taxonomie And
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 1978 Band/Volume: 9 Autor(en)/Author(s): Naumann Clas M., Racheli Tommaso Artikel/Article: Taxonomie and ecological observations on Zygaena F. from the Province of Fars, Southern Iran (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae) 208-218 ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at A TA LAN TA , Bd. IX , Heft 3, September 1978, Würzburg Taxonomie and ecological observations on Zygaena F. from the Province of Fars, Southern Iran (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae) by CLAS M. N A U M A N N *) and TOMMASO RACHELI *) 11th contribution to the knowledge of the genus Zygaena F. and related taxa (Zygaenidae, Lepidoptera) (10: Ent.Z. 88: 37-40). In 1976 the second author together with Ing. EM ILIO STEFANELLI and friends of the Zoology department of the university of Rome, conducted an entomolo gical and ecological field trip to Iran (May 22 to Juni 9). Since some of the findings in the moth genus Zygaena F. (Zygaenidae, Lepidoptera) are of spe cial faunistic, ecological and phylogenetic interest a short account is given here. Collecting and observations took place in the following localities: 1) Dasht-e-Arjan, biotop 1, 2100 m (approximately 60 km west of Shiraz): A south exposed slope on the north-western border of Dasht-e-Arjan Natio nal Park. The biotope is characterised by small ravines, whose sides were scantly covered with bushes among which numerous M arrubium crassidens (Labiatae) were flowering. These were the main feeding and resting flowers for the Zygaena, as has also been stated by TREMEWAN (1975). -
The Status and Distribution of Mediterranean Butterflies
About IUCN IUCN is a membership Union composed of both government and civil society organisations. It harnesses the experience, resources and reach of its 1,300 Member organisations and the input of some 15,000 experts. IUCN is the global authority on the status of the natural world and the measures needed to safeguard it. www.iucn.org https://twitter.com/IUCN/ IUCN – The Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of more than 10,000 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. http://www.iucn.org/theme/species/about/species-survival-commission-ssc IUCN – Global Species Programme The IUCN Species Programme supports the activities of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and individual Specialist Groups, as well as implementing global species conservation initiatives. It is an integral part of the IUCN Secretariat and is managed from IUCN’s international headquarters in Gland, Switzerland. The Species Programme includes a number of technical units covering Species Trade and Use, the IUCN Red List Unit, Freshwater Biodiversity Unit (all located in Cambridge, UK), the Global Biodiversity Assessment Initiative (located in Washington DC, USA), and the Marine Biodiversity Unit (located in Norfolk, Virginia, USA). www.iucn.org/species IUCN – Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation The Centre was opened in October 2001 with the core support of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Environment, the regional Government of Junta de Andalucía and the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID). -
Rote Listen Von Rheinland-Pfalz
Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege Rote Listen von Rheinland-Pfalz Quelle: Standardartenliste vom 08.11.2006 (Ref. 41) Herausgeber: Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht Rheinland-Pfalz Kaiser-Friedrich-Str. 7 55116 Mainz Ansprechpartner: Standardartenliste und Redaktion: Claudia Röter-Flechtner Tel.: 06131 / 6033 - 1428 [email protected] : Rote Listen: Ludwig Simon Tel.: 06131 / 6033 - 1434 [email protected] Dr. Dieter Rühl Tel.: 06131 / 6033 - 1430 [email protected] Auflage: 1. Auflage, Dezember 2006 2. erweiterte Auflage, September 2007 Einleitung...................................................................................................................................... 1 Kategorien der Rote Listen........................................................................................................... 2 Rote Liste Krebse – Crustacea .................................................................................................... 3 Rote Liste Libellen – Odonata...................................................................................................... 4 Sortierung nach wissenschaftlichen Artnamen ................................................................... 4 Sortierung nach deutschen Artnamen ................................................................................ 6 Rote Liste Geradflügler – Orthoptera ........................................................................................... 8 Sortierung nach wissenschaftlichen Artnamen .................................................................. -
How Reliable Is It?
PROTECTED AREA SITE SELECTION BASED ON ABIOTIC DATA: HOW RELIABLE IS IT? A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY BANU KAYA ÖZDEMĠREL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOLOGY FEBRUARY 2011 Approval of the thesis: PROTECTED AREA SITE SELECTION BASED ON ABIOTIC DATA: HOW RELIABLE IS IT? submitted by BANU KAYA ÖZDEMİREL in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Canan Özgen _____________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Musa Doğan _____________ Head of Department, Biological Sciences, METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. C. Can Bilgin _____________ Supervisor, Department of Biological Sciences, METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Aykut Kence ____________________ Department of Biological Sciences, METU. Assoc. Prof. Dr. C. Can Bilgin ____________________ Department of Biological Sciences, METU. Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya ____________________ Department of Biological Sciences, METU. Prof. Dr. Nilgül Karadeniz ____________________ Department of Landscape Architecture. AU. Prof. Dr. ġebnem Düzgün ____________________ Department of Mining Engineering. METU. Date: 11.02.2011 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Banu Kaya Özdemirel Signature : III ABSTRACT PROTECTED AREA SITE SELECTION BASED ON ABIOTIC DATA: HOW RELIABLE IS IT? Özdemirel Kaya, Banu Ph.D., Department of Biology Supervisor: Assoc. -
Punakaiki Coastal Restoration Project: 2014 - 2016
RESTORATION RESEARCH Punakaiki Coastal Restoration Project: 2014 - 2016 Edited by Juergen Esperschuetz, Mike Bowie, Carol Smith, Mick Abbott and Nick Dickinson Lincoln University Wildlife Management Report No. 60 www.designlab.ac.nz ISSN: 1179-7738 ISBN: 978-0-86476-418-8 Acknowledgements: Lincoln University staff members: Myles MacKintosh, Lynne Clucas, Jon Sullivan, Nathan Curtis, Hannah Buckley, Brad Case, Kate Blackburne, Woody Lee. Lincoln University students: Youngnam Kim, Greg Curline and Michael Smith. Canterbury Museum staff: Peter Johns, Cor Vink and Matt Shaw. Canterbury University: Milen Marinov, Stephen Pohe, Phillip Jellyman and Simon Howard. CVNZ: James Washer, Dave Sharp, Ian Smith and Eddie Morrow. Te Papa: Bruce Marshall. DOC: Bob Dickson, Jane Marshall, and Chippy Wood. Rio Tinto: Stuart Rhodes and Karin Lorenzon. Environmental Management & Research Consultants: Owen Nichols. Ministry for Primary Industries: Carol Muir. Landcare Research: Andre Larochelle, Katherine Trought. NIWA: Shannan Crow. 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................5 2. Introduction ...........................................................................7 3. The Punakaiki Coastal Restoration Project .........................8 3.1 Introduction to the research site .................................................................................................................8 3.2 Research activities from 2013 until present ................................................................................................9