DOCSLIB.ORG

Strasbourg, 19 April 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strasbourg, 19 April 2013 Strasbourg, 25 October 2013 T-PVS (2013) 17 [tpvs17e_2013.doc] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Group of Experts on the Conservation of Invertebrates Tirana, Albania 23-24 September 2013 ---ooOoo--- REPORT Document prepared by the Directorate of Democratic Governance This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS (2013) 17 - 2 - CONTENTS 1. Meeting report ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Appendix 1: Agenda .......................................................................................................................... 6 3. Appendix 2: List of participants ........................................................................................................ 9 4. Appendix 3: Compilation of National Reports .................................................................................. 10 5. Appendix 4: Draft Recommendation on threats by neurotoxic insecticides to pollinators ................ 75 * * * The Standing Committee is invited to: 1. Take note of the report of the meeting; 2. Thank the Albanian government for the efficient preparation of the meeting and the excellent hospitality; 3. Continue with Bern Convention engagement with invertebrate conservation issues by further encouraging and monitoring national implementation of European Strategy for the Conservation of Invertebrates; 4. Encourage and support awareness-raising and communication initiatives in invertebrate conservation strategies at national level; 5. Examine and, if appropriate, adopt the draft recommendation on the threats by neurotoxic insecticides to pollinators (appendix 4); 6. Take note of the activities proposed by the Group for its future work. - 3 - T-PVS (2013) 17 1. OPENING OF THE MEETING Prof. Pellumb Abeshi, General Director of Environmental Policies Ministry of Environment, Forest and Water Administration, welcomed the members of the Group of Experts on behalf of the Albanian environmental authorities. He stressed the country’s engagement to the biodiversity protection, illustrated by the adoption of laws on “Protected Areas” (2002), “Biodiversity protection” (2006), “Wild Fauna Protection” (2008) and “Hunting” (2010). The Chair of the Group of Experts, Ms Marian Ramos (Spain), welcomed participants (a list of which is included in Appendix 2) and opened the meeting. Participants introduced themselves, highlighting their work and experience in the conservation of invertebrates in their countries. 2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA The draft agenda was adopted as it appears in Appendix 1. 3. INTRODUCTION BY THE SECRETARIAT Mr Eladio Fernandez-Galiano recalled that the previous meeting of the Group of Experts took place in Norway in 2008. The present meeting follows the invitation by the Albanian government to host the Group of Experts five years later, and the meeting agenda reflects the changes occurred in the area of invertebrate conservation, namely as regards the threats to pollinators. Mr Fernandez-Galiano stressed that invertebrate conservation in Europe has been steadily gaining momentum over the last decade. Within the Bern Convention, 10 experts’ meetings have been held since 1989. Starting from 1997, the emphasis was put on the role of protected areas on strengthening habitat security and conservation. Networks of nature protection areas were established under both Habitats Directive (Natura 2000 network) and the Bern Convention (Emerald network) to ensure the long-term survival of Europe’s most valuable and threatened species – including invertebrates – and habitats. Mr Fernandez-Galiano highlighted that the Parties have to take responsibility for ensuring that conservation of invertebrates are part of national conservation strategies, and their place and the role in the global biodiversity and the ecosystem function needs to be further recognised and valued. 4. PROGRESS IN THE CONSERVATION OF INVERTEBRATES SINCE THE LAST MEETING (JUNE 2008) – NATIONAL REPORTS The delegates of Austria, Albania, Croatia, Czech Republic, Iceland, Netherlands, Poland, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Ukraine presented their national reports. These national reports are presented in Appendix 3 to this document. The presentation of national reports illustrated that conservation of invertebrates continue to be focused on three main types of action including the work on habitats, species and better mobilisation of data and research on invertebrate species. Habitat actions: in most cases, the conservation of invertebrates have benefited from the establishment of increased number of protected areas, primarily due to the completion of the Natura 2000 and Emerald networks. Some reported actions included conservation and management measures for selected species or groups of invertebrates within protected areas, restoration of habitats and the assessment measures implemented within the framework of reporting on the status of listed habitats and species under the Article 17 of the Habitats Directive. Species actions: Some common points of particular relevance were the development and publication of red lists, red books, distribution studies, atlases, development and implementation of targeted actions for selected protected species (national action plans) or tailored support for the recovery and growth of most endangered populations. Mobilisation of data and research: Particularly optimistic progress was reported in increasing the knowledge and information on threatened and data deficient species to establish their population size, distribution and trends; recollecting of scattered information into national inventories and databanks; better taking into account data on invertebrates into the work on indicators; and building national taxonomic capacity. T-PVS (2013) 17 - 4 - 5. FOLLOW-UP OF RECOMMENDATION NO. 120 (2006) ON THE EUROPEAN STRATEGY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF INVERTEBRATES The Secretariat recalled that the Recommendation No. 120 (2006) encouraged governments to draw up and implement national strategies on invertebrate species, which justifies the need for the Group of Experts to exchange information on national policies put in place to assess and counter threats to invertebrates. Mr John Haslett gave a short presentation on the European Strategy for the Conservation of Invertebrates and recalled that raising awareness and changing human attitudes and behaviour remains one of the most important challenges for implementing the strategy. He stressed that despite the fundamental importance of invertebrates and the ecological services they provide, the need for invertebrate conservation is still little appreciated and more efforts are needed to raise the invertebrate profile in national conservations strategies. Mr Yves Gonseth (Switzerland) suggested that measuring impacts of invertebrate decline on national economies and analysing what is at stake if these impacts continue, can be a valuable tool in encouraging more decisive national policies. It was also argued that although it was important for the national decision-makers to recognize, demonstrate and capture the values of ecosystem services and biodiversity, the conservation of invertebrates should remain first of all a matter of shared values and that awareness-raising and environmental education are fundamental elements for implementing the European strategy for the conservation of invertebrates. Mr Jan Plesnik, Chairman of the Standing Committee, underlined that the EuropeanStrategy remains one of the key achievements under the Bern Convention and that there is a need to support and enhance its use at national level. All participants agreed that more efforts need be done to promote and publicise the Strategy at national level, and that the future work of the group should concentrate on that particular objective. 6. INVERTEBRATE DATABASES AND THEIR UPDATE The Secretariat briefly introduced the topic. Because of the high number of species and the relative scarcity of taxonomists, in some cases lack of updated information on the status of Europe’s invertebrates may lead to insufficient protection. The problem may become more important in the next decades when, as a result of climate change, distribution of many species experience radical change. Actually this is already happening, making some invertebrate groups indicators for climate change. Mr Yves Gonseth (Switzerland) pointed out that while taxonomic information is relatively good already – at least in some states and major groups – ecological data were still poor, so more efforts should be directed in that sense. The Chair noted that ecological and biological data had to be matched to know the potential future distribution of species as a result of climate change. Mr Jan Plesnik (Czech Republic) noted that for Natura 2000, information was gathered for species listed in the Appendices of the Directive (largely coincident with thus in the Convention). National databases are usually more robust. The Group encouraged states to keep gathering and sharing data, in co-operation with relevant scientific societies and conservation groups. 7. THREATS TO POLLINATORS FROM NEUROTOXIC INSECTICIDES (WITH DRAFT RECOMMENDATION) The Secretariat presented the draft recommendation on the threats by neurotoxic insecticides to pollinators. Delegates discussed the effects that new insecticides were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Iberian Dung Beetles Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae): Insights on the Evolution of Nesting Behavior
    J Mol Evol +2002) 55:116±126 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-002-2314-4 Phylogenetic Relationships of Iberian Dung Beetles Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae): Insights on the Evolution of Nesting Behavior Soraya Villalba,Jorge M. Lobo,Fermõ  n Martõ n-Piera,* Rafael Zardoya Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Jose Gutie rrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain Received: 22 October 2001 / Accepted: 25 January 2002 Abstract. A phylogeny of the main lineages of dung Introduction beetles +Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) from the Iberian Peninsula was based on partial nucleotide sequences The Scarabaeinae +dung beetles) are a worldwide- +about 1221 bp) of the mitochondrial cytochrome distributed, highly successful subfamily of Coleoptera oxidase I and II genes of 33 taxa. Our phylogenetic with nearly 5000 species grouped in 234 genera analyses con®rmed the validity and composition of +Hanski and Cambefort 1991). Ever since Linnaeus' most of the recognized tribes within the subfamily. Systema Naturae, dung beetles have received wide Interestingly, the Onitini showed an evolutionary rate attention from entomologists because of their singu- signi®cantly higher than that of the other tribes. The lar adaptations in exploiting vertebrate dung pads molecular phylogeny supports a sister-group rela- +e.g., Fabre 1897, 1899; Heymons and von Lengerken tionship of the tribes Onitini and Oniticellini + On- 1922; Burmeister 1930; Heymons 1930; Prasse 1957; thophagini. A close relationship of Scarabaeini, Rommel, 1961; Balthasar 1963; Halter and Matth- Gymnopleurini, and Sisyphini is also suggested but ews 1966; Halter and Edmonds 1982). Scarabaeids lacks bootstrap support. Surprisingly, the Coprini, are one of the best-studied groups of beetles in terms which had always been related to the Oniticellini and of taxonomy +Janssens 1949; Balthasar 1963; Iablo- Onthophagini, were placed closer to the Scarabaeini, kov-Khnzorian 1977; Zunino 1984; Browne and Gymnopleurini, and Sisyphini.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Indicators of the Effects of Multiple Farming Activities in a Mediterranean High Nature Value Farmland
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL Ecological indicators of the effects of multiple farming activities in a Mediterranean High Nature Value Farmland Bernardo Reis Rocha Mestrado em Ecologia e Gestão Ambiental Dissertação orientada por: Doutor Mário Boieiro (cE3c-FCUL) Doutora Paula Matos (cE3c-FCUL) 2017 Agradecimentos / Acknowlegments Primeiramente gostaria de agradecer à Doutora Cristina Branquinho, ao Doutor Mário Boieiro à Doutora Paula Matos e ao Doutor Pedro Pinho pela oportunidade que me concederam para desenvolver a minha tese de mestrado sob a sua alçada. Este ano que passou sob a vossa orientação permitiu-me abrir horizontes de conhecimento e criar dinâmicas de trabalho novas, que vou levar comigo no futuro. Apesar de oficialmente apenas o Doutor Mário Boieiro e a Doutora Paula Matos serem meus orientadores, também a Doutora Cristina Branquinho e o Doutor Pedro Pinho foram importantíssimos para a concretização deste estudo. Obrigado pelo auxílio, partilha de conhecimentos, orientação e amizade. Foram pessoas muito importantes nesta caminhada e espero que continuem a sê-lo no futuro. A vossa dedicação à ciência é uma inspiração para qualquer iniciante na “modalidade”. Às minhas companheiras de campo, as quase doutoras Clara Wendt e Joana Vieira. À Clara pelo auxílio na montagem e recolha dos pitfalls dos escaravelhos e à Joana pelas horas infindáveis, de lupa na mão, a identificar e contar líquenes. Sem ambas ainda hoje estaria na Companhia das Lezírias a trabalhar. Aproveito também para vos desejar boa sorte nos vossos doutoramentos. À Cristiana Aleixo, pela ajuda relativamente à recolha de informação sobre diversas variáveis ambientas e na construção dos mapas, sendo indispensável para que este trabalho fosse concretizado com sucesso.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Laboratory Breeding of Xylophagous Insect Larvae and Its Application in Cytogenetic Studies 2)
    Eos, t. LXII, págs. 7-22 (1986). Artificial laboratory breeding of xylophagous insect larvae and its application in cytogenetic studies 2) BY J. R. BARAGAÑO, A. NOTARIO y M. G. DE VIEDMA. INTRODUCTION HAYDAK, in 1936, managed to rear Oryzaephilus surinantensis (L.) in the la- boratory using an artificial diet. Many researchers have followed in his footsteps, so that since then, approximately 260 species of Coleoptera have been raised on nonnatural diets. Among these species there are 121 which are eminently xylophagous. They belong to seven families (Buprestidae, Elateridae, Bostrychiclae, Lyctidae, Myc- teridae, Cerambyciclae and Curculionidae). Their importance, from the economic point of view, varies widely : some of them attack living trees making them a pest ; others feed on dead or decaying wood so that they may be considered harmless or even beneficial (for example in the decomposition of tree stumps in forests) ; finally, a few cause damage to seasoned timber. Therefore, specialists in artificial breeding have been motivated by different objectives, and so have chosen the insect or insects in each case which were most suitable for obtaining specific desired results. It is clear that in the majority of cases the choice was not made at random. Generally, the insect studied was either recently established as a pest or well documented as such. •With these laboratory breeding experiments it is possible on the one hand to draw conclusions about the insects' nutritive requirements, parasitism, ethology etc ; and on the other to obtain enough specimens to try out different phytosanitary treatments with them. Both of these achievements are applicable to effectiye control of the insect problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: the Role of Nature Reserves in Preserving Saproxylic Biodiversity: Using Longhorn Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) As Bioindicators
    Title: The role of nature reserves in preserving saproxylic biodiversity: using longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) as bioindicators Author: Lech Karpiński, István Maák, Piotr Węgierek Citation style: Karpiński Lech, Maák István, Węgierek Piotr. (2021). The role of nature reserves in preserving saproxylic biodiversity: using longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) as bioindicators. "The European Zoological Journal" (2021, iss. 1, s. 487-504), doi 10.1080/24750263.2021.1900427 The European Zoological Journal, 2021, 487–504 https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2021.1900427 The role of nature reserves in preserving saproxylic biodiversity: using longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) as bioindicators L. KARPIŃSKI 1*, I. MAÁK 2, & P. WEGIEREK 3 1Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, 2Department of Ecology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary, and 3Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland (Received 9 August 2020; accepted 2 March 2021) Abstract The potential of forest nature reserves as refuges for biodiversity seems to be overlooked probably due to their small size. These, however, may constitute important safe havens for saproxylic organisms since forest reserves are relatively numerous in Europe. Saproxylic beetles are among the key groups for the assessment of biodiversity in forest habitats and longhorn beetles may play an important role in bioindication as they are ecologically associated with various micro- habitats and considered a very heterogeneous family of insects. To study the role of forest reserves as important habitats for saproxylic beetles, we compared cerambycid assemblages in corresponding pairs of sites (nature reserves and managed stands) in a forest region under high anthropogenic pressure (Upper Silesia, Poland, Central Europe).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum ARTHROPODA ORTHOPTERA
    Phylum ARTHROPODA ORTHOPTERA Baetica ustulata (Rambur, 1838). Ephippiger ustulata Rambur, 1838. "F. Ent.". Andal. II (3), Dec., p. 52. Baetica Bolivar, 1903. "Bull. Mus.". Paris, 9, p.227. Phylum ARTHROPODA. Subphylum UNIRAMIA. Clase: INSECTA. Orden: ORTHOPTERA. Suborden: ENSIFERA. Superfamilia: TETTIGONIOIDEA. Familia: TETTIGONIIDAE. Subfamilia: EPHIPPIGERINAE. Nombre vulgar: desconocido por nosotros. Género monoespecífico. STATUS Convenio de Berna II. UICN-V. Directiva hábitats. España: rara (5). DISTRIBUCION Distribución mediterránea montana: rango Penibético, Sierra Nevada (Granada) (2-4,7- 9). UTM (2) 30SVG60, 30SVF69. (7) 30SVG60, 30SVG40, 30SVF69, 30SVF79. BIOLOGIA Especie carnívora y detritívora, muy especializada al hábitat alpino (3). Presenta actividad diurna. No parece mostrar una alta especialización en la dieta, recurriendo a un alimento alternativo. Especialización reproductiva (5). MAPA 80 HABITAT Forma alpina: especie que vive en cumbres altas, en suelo desnudo o bajo piedras y rocas, en áreas desoladas, desprovistas de vegetación, a veces cerca de la línea de nieves perpetuas (1); en pastizales xéricos; desde los 2.500 a 3.400 m. de altitud. Es una especie geófila especialmente con las condiciones meteorológicas adversas (5). POBLACION El área sobre la que el taxón se distribuye es muy pequeño. El tamaño poblacional es mediano. Las poblaciones están restringidas a zonas montañosas y se sospechan estables (6). La distribución está bien conocida y su presencia es predecible en todo su rango. Los factores que actúan en su distribución y población son desconocidos o cuestionables (5). AMENAZAS Dada la distribución tan restringida y la fragilidad del biotopo montano, todos aquellos factores que puedan alterar mínimamente su hábitat constituyen graves amenazas. Actúa especialmente de esta forma la presión turística.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance Document on the Strict Protection of Animal Species of Community Interest Under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC
    Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC Final version, February 2007 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 I. CONTEXT 6 I.1 Species conservation within a wider legal and political context 6 I.1.1 Political context 6 I.1.2 Legal context 7 I.2 Species conservation within the overall scheme of Directive 92/43/EEC 8 I.2.1 Primary aim of the Directive: the role of Article 2 8 I.2.2 Favourable conservation status 9 I.2.3 Species conservation instruments 11 I.2.3.a) The Annexes 13 I.2.3.b) The protection of animal species listed under both Annexes II and IV in Natura 2000 sites 15 I.2.4 Basic principles of species conservation 17 I.2.4.a) Good knowledge and surveillance of conservation status 17 I.2.4.b) Appropriate and effective character of measures taken 19 II. ARTICLE 12 23 II.1 General legal considerations 23 II.2 Requisite measures for a system of strict protection 26 II.2.1 Measures to establish and effectively implement a system of strict protection 26 II.2.2 Measures to ensure favourable conservation status 27 II.2.3 Measures regarding the situations described in Article 12 28 II.2.4 Provisions of Article 12(1)(a)-(d) in relation to ongoing activities 30 II.3 The specific protection provisions under Article 12 35 II.3.1 Deliberate capture or killing of specimens of Annex IV(a) species 35 II.3.2 Deliberate disturbance of Annex IV(a) species, particularly during periods of breeding, rearing, hibernation and migration 37 II.3.2.a) Disturbance 37 II.3.2.b) Periods
    [Show full text]
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]
  • Boring Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in White Spruce (Picea Glauca (Moench) Voss) Ecosystems of Alaska
    United States Department of Agriculture Effect of Ecosystem Disturbance Forest Service on Diversity of Bark and Wood- Pacific Northwest Research Station Boring Beetles (Coleoptera: Research Paper PNW-RP-546 April 2002 Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in White Spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) Ecosystems of Alaska Richard A. Werner This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommenda- tions for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate state and federal agencies, or both, before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. Author Richard A. Werner was a research entomologist (retired), Pacific Northwest Research Station, 8080 NW Ridgewood Drive, Corvallis, OR 97330. He is currently a volunteer at the Pacific Northwest Research Station conducting research for the Long Term Ecological Research Program in Alaska. Abstract Werner, Richard A. 2002. Effect of ecosystem disturbance on diversity of bark and wood-boring beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) ecosystems of Alaska. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-546. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 15 p. Fire and timber harvest are the two major disturbances that alter forest ecosystems in interior Alaska. Both types of disturbance provide habitats that attract wood borers and bark beetles the first year after the disturbance, but populations then decrease to levels below those in undisturbed sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Bees and Wasps of the East Sussex South Downs
    A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 Abstract For six years between 2003 and 2008, over 100 site visits were made to fifteen chalk grassland and chalk heath sites within the South Downs of Vice-county 14 (East Sussex). This produced a list of 227 bee and wasp species and revealed the comparative frequency of different species, the comparative richness of different sites and provided a basic insight into how many of the species interact with the South Downs at a site and landscape level. The study revealed that, in addition to the character of the semi-natural grasslands present, the bee and wasp fauna is also influenced by the more intensively-managed agricultural landscapes of the Downs, with many species taking advantage of blossoming hedge shrubs, flowery fallow fields, flowery arable field margins, flowering crops such as Rape, plus plants such as buttercups, thistles and dandelions within relatively improved pasture. Some very rare species were encountered, notably the bee Halictus eurygnathus Blüthgen which had not been seen in Britain since 1946. This was eventually recorded at seven sites and was associated with an abundance of Greater Knapweed. The very rare bees Anthophora retusa (Linnaeus) and Andrena niveata Friese were also observed foraging on several dates during their flight periods, providing a better insight into their ecology and conservation requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Depressariinae of Madeira and the Azores Islands (Lepidoptera: Depressariidae)
    69 (2): 331 – 353 2019 © 2019 TheSenckenberg Authors Gesellschaft für Naturforschung Depressariinae of Madeira and the Azores Islands (Lepidoptera: Depressariidae) With 35 figures Peter Buchner 1 and Ole Karsholt 2 1 Scheibenstraße 335, A-2625 Schwarzau am Steinfeld, Austria. – [email protected] 2 Zoological Museum, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. – [email protected] Published on 2019–12–23 DOI: 10.21248/contrib.entomol.69.2.331-353 Abstract We review and illustrate the species of Depressariinae known from Madeira and the Azores Islands. The following six species are treated: Agonopterix scopariella (Heinemann, 1870), A. conciliatella (Rebel, 1892), A. vendettella (Chrétien, 1908) (new to Madeira), A. perezi Walsingham, 1908, Depressaria marcella Rebel, 1901 (new to Madeira and the Azores), and D. halophilella Chrétien, 1908. The latter replaces Depressaria ultimella Stainton, 1849 in the list of Lepidoptera found in Madeira. Depressaria iliensis Rebel, 1936 is a synonym of Agonopterix vendettella (Chrétien, 1908) (syn. nov.). Depressaria halophilella is new to the Canary Islands. We provide brief notes on each of the species and give short diagnoses for correctly identifying them, and we discuss previous misidentifications of Madeiran Depressariinae. Key words Lepidoptera, Depressariinae, Madeira, Azores Islands Zusammenfassung Wir überprüfen und illustrieren die von Madeira und den Azoren bekannten Depressariinae. Folgende sechs Arten werden behandelt: Agonopterix scopariella (Heinemann, 1870), A. conciliatella (Rebel, 1892), A. vendettella (Chrétien, 1908) (neu für Madeira), A. perezi Walsingham, 1908, Depressaria marcella Rebel, 1901 (neu für Madeira und die Azoren), und D. halophilella Chrétien, 1908. Letztere ersetzt Depressaria ultimella Stainton, 1849 in der Liste der von Madeira nachgewiesenen Lepidoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation
    M DC, — _ CO ^. E CO iliSNrNVINOSHilWS' S3ldVyan~LIBRARlES*"SMITHS0N!AN~lNSTITUTl0N N' oCO z to Z (/>*Z COZ ^RIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTlON NOIiniIiSNI_NVINOSHllWS S3ldVaan_L: iiiSNi'^NviNOSHiiNS S3iavyan libraries Smithsonian institution N( — > Z r- 2 r" Z 2to LI ^R I ES^'SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTlON'"NOIini!iSNI~NVINOSHilVMS' S3 I b VM 8 11 w </» z z z n g ^^ liiiSNi NviNOSHims S3iyvyan libraries Smithsonian institution N' 2><^ =: to =: t/J t/i </> Z _J Z -I ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHilWS SSIdVyan L — — </> — to >'. ± CO uiiSNi NViNosHiiws S3iyvaan libraries Smithsonian institution n CO <fi Z "ZL ~,f. 2 .V ^ oCO 0r Vo^^c>/ - -^^r- - 2 ^ > ^^^^— i ^ > CO z to * z to * z ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNl NVINOSHllWS S3iaVdan L to 2 ^ '^ ^ z "^ O v.- - NiOmst^liS^> Q Z * -J Z I ID DAD I re CH^ITUCnMIAM IMOTtTIITinM / c. — t" — (/) \ Z fj. Nl NVINOSHIIINS S3 I M Vd I 8 H L B R AR I ES, SMITHSONlAN~INSTITUTION NOIlfl :S^SMITHS0NIAN_ INSTITUTION N0liniliSNI__NIVIN0SHillMs'^S3 I 8 VM 8 nf LI B R, ^Jl"!NVINOSHimS^S3iavyan"'LIBRARIES^SMITHS0NIAN~'lNSTITUTI0N^NOIin L '~^' ^ [I ^ d 2 OJ .^ . ° /<SS^ CD /<dSi^ 2 .^^^. ro /l^2l^!^ 2 /<^ > ^'^^ ^ ..... ^ - m x^^osvAVix ^' m S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — NOIlfliliSNrNVINOSHimS^SS iyvyan~LIBR/ S "^ ^ ^ c/> z 2 O _ Xto Iz JI_NVIN0SH1I1/MS^S3 I a Vd a n^LI B RAR I ES'^SMITHSONIAN JNSTITUTION "^NOlin Z -I 2 _j 2 _j S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iyVaan LI BR/ 2: r- — 2 r- z NVINOSHiltNS ^1 S3 I MVy I 8 n~L B R AR I Es'^SMITHSONIAN'iNSTITUTIOn'^ NOlin ^^^>^ CO z w • z i ^^ > ^ s smithsonian_institution NoiiniiiSNi to NviNosHiiws'^ss I dVH a n^Li br; <n / .* -5^ \^A DO « ^\t PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD AND Journal of Variation Edited by P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Spineless Spineless Rachael Kemp and Jonathan E
    Spineless Status and trends of the world’s invertebrates Edited by Ben Collen, Monika Böhm, Rachael Kemp and Jonathan E. M. Baillie Spineless Spineless Status and trends of the world’s invertebrates of the world’s Status and trends Spineless Status and trends of the world’s invertebrates Edited by Ben Collen, Monika Böhm, Rachael Kemp and Jonathan E. M. Baillie Disclaimer The designation of the geographic entities in this report, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expressions of any opinion on the part of ZSL, IUCN or Wildscreen concerning the legal status of any country, territory, area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Citation Collen B, Böhm M, Kemp R & Baillie JEM (2012) Spineless: status and trends of the world’s invertebrates. Zoological Society of London, United Kingdom ISBN 978-0-900881-68-8 Spineless: status and trends of the world’s invertebrates (paperback) 978-0-900881-70-1 Spineless: status and trends of the world’s invertebrates (online version) Editors Ben Collen, Monika Böhm, Rachael Kemp and Jonathan E. M. Baillie Zoological Society of London Founded in 1826, the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) is an international scientifi c, conservation and educational charity: our key role is the conservation of animals and their habitats. www.zsl.org International Union for Conservation of Nature International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) helps the world fi nd pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. www.iucn.org Wildscreen Wildscreen is a UK-based charity, whose mission is to use the power of wildlife imagery to inspire the global community to discover, value and protect the natural world.
    [Show full text]