DOCSLIB.ORG

Ancient Rhetoric and the Synoptic Problem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ancient Rhetoric and the Synoptic Problem Ancient Rhetoric and the Synoptic Problem by Alexander Lorne Damm A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department for the Study of Religion University of Toronto © Copyright by Alexander Lorne Damm, 2010 ii Ancient Rhetoric and the Synoptic Problem Alexander Lorne Damm Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department for the Study of Religion University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Only recently have studies of the synoptic problem begun to ground their assessments of literary dependence in ancient conventions. In an effort to appreciate more fully the evangelists’ modus operandi, our study examines their appeal to Greco-Roman rhetoric, the “science of speaking well.” Focusing on a rhetorical form called the chreia (xrei/a ), we examine rhetorical techniques and reasons for chreia adaptation, particularly reasons why authors changed this form in theory and in the practice of the Hellenistic authors Plutarch and Josephus. With these reasons in mind, we assess literary dependence among the synoptic gospels, focusing on one chreia in the Triple Tradition (Matt. 9:14- 17/Mark 2:18-22/Luke 5:33-39) and another in the Double Tradition (Matt. 12:22- 37/Mark 3:20-35/Luke 11:14-36). Our study illustrates that hypotheses of Markan priority, like the Farrer Hypothesis and Two-Document Hypothesis, are more rhetorically plausible than hypotheses of Matthean priority. While Matthew and Luke’s adaptations of Mark reflect the rhetorical reasoning that we should expect, Mark’s reasoning is often problematic, for Mark repeatedly works against the fundamental rhetorical principles of clarity and propriety. iii Acknowledgements The kind guidance of several individuals has been of great help to me in writing this dissertation. Above all, I wish to thank my supervisor, Professor John Kloppenborg (Department and Centre for the Study of Religion, University of Toronto), whose knowledge of gospel traditions is remarkable and who affords a scholarly role model of the highest order. Professor Kloppenborg helped me to generate this thesis and he has patiently and thoughtfully advised and encouraged me for several years. I also wish to thank the readers of my dissertation, Professor Terence Donaldson, Wycliffe College (Toronto), Professor Mechtilde O’Mara, St. Michael’s College (Toronto), Professor John Marshall, Department for the Study of Religion (Toronto), and Professor Loveday Alexander, University of Sheffield (England). Their careful reading and questioning of my work has helped me to improve it substantially. Constructive criticism and encouragement has come too from Professor Michel Desjardins, Wilfrid Laurier University (Waterloo) and Dr. Ryan Defonzo. Finally, I wish to express my gratitude to my mother Alexis, my father Beverley and my partner Priya. These individuals have had an immeasurable impact on me, and to them I dedicate this work. iv Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………ii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………….iii Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………iv List of Abbreviations………………………………………………………………v List of Tables…………………………………………………………………….viii List of Appendices…………………………………………………………………x Introduction. Ancient Rhetoric and the Synoptic Problem………………………...1 Part 1. The Rhetorical Adaptation of Chreiai ………………………….……...28 Chapter 1. Rhetorical Conventions for the Adaptation of Chreiai…………….….29 Chapter 2. Chreia Adaptation in the Writings of Plutarch…………….………...117 Chapter 3. Adaptation of Speeches ( lo&goi ) in Josephus’ Antiquitates Judaicae …………………………………………………………....152 Conclusion to Part 1………………………………………………………….….217 Part 2. Applications of Rhetoric to the Synoptic Problem …………..…... .222 Chapter 4. Rhetorical Criticism and the Triple Tradition: Fasting (Matt. 9:14-17 / Mark 2:18-22 / Luke 5:33-39)…………………………………………………..223 Chapter 5. Rhetorical Criticism and the Double Tradition: The Beelzebul Controversy (Matt. 12:22-37 / Mark 3:20-35 / Luke 11:14-36)………………...283 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………...………356 Appendix 1……………………………………………………………………...358 Appendix 2……………………………………………………………………...362 Appendix 3……………………………………………………………………...384 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………….433 v List of Abbreviations Modern Works AB Anchor Bible ABD Anchor Bible Dictionary. Edited by D. N. Freedman. 6 vols. New York, 1992 ALGHJ Arbeiten zur Literatur und Geschichte des hellenistischen Judentums ANRW Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt: Geschichte und Kultur Roms im Spiegel der neueren Forschung. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Hasse. Berlin, 1972- AQAA Ancient Quotes and Anecdotes: From Crib to Crypt , Compiled and Edited by V. K. Robbins. Sonoma, 1989 BAGD Bauer, W., W. F. Arndt, F. W. Gingrich, and F. W. Danker. Greek- English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 2d ed. Chicago, 1979 BDF Blass, F., A. Debrunner, and R. W. Funk. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Chicago, 1961 BETL Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium BibInt Biblical Interpretation BibS(F) Biblische Studien (Frieburg, 1895-) BiTS Biblical Tools and Studies BTB Biblical Theology Bulletin Budé Collection des universities de France, publiée sous le patronage de l’Association Guillaume Budé BZNW Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft CBET Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology FF Foundations and Facets FTS Frankfurter theologische Studien GRBS Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies HCS Hellenistic Culture and Society HDR Harvard Dissertations in Religion ICC International Critical Commentary JBL Journal of Biblical Literature JRS Journal of Roman Studies JSNT Journal for the Study of the New Testament JSNTSup Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series JSPSup Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha: Supplement Series LCL Loeb Classical Library LD Lectio divina LSJ Liddell, H. G., R. Scott, H. S. Jones, A Greek-English Lexicon. 9th ed. with revised supplement. Oxford, 1996 vi NIB The New Interpreter’s Bible NIGTC New International Greek Testament Commentary NovT Novum Testamentum NovTSup Novum Testamentum Supplements NRSV The New Revised Standard Version NTG New Testament Guides NTM New Testament Monographs NTS New Testament Studies OCD Oxford Classical Dictionary. Edited by S. Hornblower and A. Spawforth. 3d ed. Oxford, 1996 SAC Studies in Antiquity and Christianity SBLSBS Society of Biblical Literature Sources for Biblical Study SBLSP Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers SBLTT Society of Biblical Literature Texts and Translations SBLWGRW Society of Biblical Literature Writings from the Greco-Roman World Series SemeiaSt Semeia Studies SJSJ Journal for the Study of Judaism Supplements SNTSMS Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series SNTSU Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt SSEJC Studies in Early Judaism and Christianity TCGNT A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. 2 nd edition. Edited by Bruce M. Metzger. Stuttgart, 1994 TUMSR Trinity University Monograph Series in Religion WUNT Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament Ancient Authors and Works Ages. Plutarch, Agesilaus Alex. Plutarch, Alexander Art. Plutarch, Artaxerxes Caes. Plutarch, Caesar Comp. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, De compositione verborum Cor. Demosthenes, De corona Ctes. Aeschines, In Ctesiphonem Ant. Josephus, Antiquitates judaicae De or. Cicero, De oratore Hist. Thucydides, Historiae Hist. Conscr. Lucian, Quomodo historia conscribenda sit Il. Homer, Iliad Pomp. Plutach, Pompeius [Reg. imp. apophth.] Plutarch, Regum et imperatorum apophthegmata Rhet. Aristotle, Rhetorica Rhet. Her. Rhetorica ad Herrenium vii Sigla 2DH Two-Document (Two-Source) Hypothesis 2GH Two-Gospel (Neo-Griesbach) Hypothesis FH Farrer-Goulder Hypothesis LXX Septuaginta: Id est Vetus Testamentum graece iuxta LXX interpretes edidit Alfred Rahlfs , Stuttgart, 1935 viii List of Tables Table 1.1: Hermogenes’ Topoi for Refutation and Confirmation……………………...358 Table 1.2: Propriety Between Contents and Style in Speeches………………………...359 Table 2.1………………………………………………………………………………..363 Table 2.2………………………………………………………………………………..364 Table 2.3…………………………………………………………………………..……365 Table 2.4………………………………………………………………………………..366 Table 2.5………………………………………………………………………………..367 Table 3.1………………………………………………………………………………..368 Table 3.2…………………………………………………………………………….….373 Table 3.3………………………………………………………………………………..379 Table 3.4a: Insertion/Amplification of Proof in Appropriate Speech Parts……………208 Table 3.4b: Articulating Speech Parts and Their Sequence……………………………209 Table 3.4c: Enhancing a)retai//virtutes of Clarity, Conciseness, Plausibility, Propriety…………………………………………………………………..210 Table 3.5: Apologetic, Theological and Literary Reasons for Change………………...214 Table 4.1: The Question on Fasting……………………………………………………385 Table 4.2: Mark’s Adaptation of Matthew and Luke…………………………………..388 Table 4.3: Matthew’s Adaptation of Mark……………………………………………..390 Table 4.4: Luke’s Adaptation of Mark…………………………………………………391 Table 5.1: The Beelzebul Controversy…………………………………………………393 Table 5.2: The Sayings Gospel Q: Text of Beelzebul Controversy (Q 11:14-23), Return of Unclean Spirit (11:24-26) and Demand for a Sign (11:29-35)…..….…...…..409 Table 5.3: Mark’s Adaptation of Matthew and Luke (the 2GH)……………………….412 ix Table 5.4: Matthew’s Adaptation of Mark (the FH)…………………………………..417 Table 5.5: Matthew’s Adaptation of Mark and Q (the 2DH)………………………….420 Table 5.6: Luke’s Adaptation of Matthew (the FH/2GH)……………………………..425 Table 5.7: Luke’s Adaptation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manual of Mythology
    ^93 t.i CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY GIFT OF HENRY BEZIAT IN MEMORY OF ANDRE AND KATE BRADLEY BEZIAT 1944 Cornell University Library BL310 .M98 1893 and Rom No Manual of mythology. Greek « Cornell University S Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029075542 'f' liiiiiliilM^^ ^ M^ISTU^L MYTHOLOGY: GREEK AND ROMAN, NORSE, AND OLD GERMAN, HINDOO AND EGYPTIAN MYTHOLOGY. BY ALEXANDER S. MURRAY, DEPARTMENT OF GREEK AND ROMAN ANTIQUITIES, BRITISH MUSEUM- REPRINTED FROM THE SECOND REVISED LONDON EDITION. •WITH 45 PLATES ON TINTED PAPER, REPRESENTING MORE THAN 90 MYTHOLOGICAL SUBJECTS. NEW YORK: CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS, 1893. ; PUBLISHERS' NOTE. Murray's Manual of Mythology has been known to the American public thus far only through the English edition. As originally published, the work was deficient in its account of the Eastern and Northern Mythology; but with these imperfections it secured a sale in this country which proved that it more nearly supplied the want which had long been felt of a compact hand-book in this study than did any other similar work. The preface to the second English edition indicates the important additions to, and changes which have been made in, the original work. Chapters upon the North- ern and Eastern Mythology have been supplied ; the descrip- tions of many of the Greek deities have been re-written accounts of the most memorable works of art, in which each deity is or was represented, have been added ; and a number iii IV PUBLISHERS NOTE.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ETHNICITY and JEWISH IDENTITY in JOSEPHUS by DAVID
    ETHNICITY AND JEWISH IDENTITY IN JOSEPHUS By DAVID McCLISTER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 David McClister 2 To the memory of my father, Dorval L. McClister, who instilled in me a love of learning; to the memory of Dr. Phil Roberts, my esteemed colleague; and to my wife, Lisa, without whose support this dissertation, or much else that I do, would not have been possible. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gladly recognize my supervisory committee chair (Dr. Konstantinos Kapparis, Associate Professor in the Classics Department at the University of Florida). I also wish to thank the other supervisory commiteee members (Dr. Jennifer Rea, Dr. Gareth Schmeling, and Dr. Gwynn Kessler as a reader from the Religious Studies Department). It is an honor to have their contributions and to work under their guidance. I also wish to thank the library staff at the University of Florida and at Florida College (especially Ashley Barlar) who did their work so well and retrieved the research materials necessary for this project. I also wish to thank my family for their patient indulgence as I have robbed them of time to give attention to the work necessary to pursue my academic interests. BWGRKL [Greek] Postscript® Type 1 and TrueTypeT font Copyright © 1994-2006 BibleWorks, LLC. All rights reserved. These Biblical Greek and Hebrew fonts are used with permission and are from BibleWorks, software for Biblical
    [Show full text]
  • The Interpretation of the Old Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism
    Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum Studies and Texts in Antiquity and Christianity Herausgeber/Editor: CHRISTOPH MARKSCHIES (Berlin) Beirat/Advisory Board HUBERT CANCIK (Berlin) • GIOVANNI CASADIO (Salerno) SUSANNA ELM (Berkeley) • JOHANNES HAHN (Münster) JÖRG RÜPKE (Erfurt) 23 John Granger Cook The Interprétation of the Old Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism Mohr Siebeck JOHN GRANGER COOK, born 1955; 1976 B.A. in Philosophy, Davidson College; 1979 M. Div., Union Theological Seminary (VA); 1982-83 Doctoral research at the University of Gottin- gen; 1985 Ph.D. at Emory University; 1985-91 Pastor at Reems Creek Presbyterian Parish in Weaverville, NC/USA; 1991-94 post doctoral studies at Emory University; since 1994 Associate Professor of Religion and Philosophy at LaGrange College, GA/USA. ISBN 3-16-148474-6 ISSN 1436-3003 (Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum) Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.ddb.de. © 2004 by Mohr Siebeck,Tübingen, Germany. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Held in Rottenburg. Printed in Germany. For my doctoral fathers, Prof. David Hellholm and the late Prof. William Beardslee, with heartfelt gratitude Table of Contents Introduction 1 0.1 Hecataeus of Abdera (ca 300 B.C.E.) 4 0.2 Manetho (III B.C.E.) 6 0.3 Ocellus Lucanus (II B.C.E.) 8 0.4 Lysimachus 9 0.5 Apollonius Molon (I B.C.E.) 11 0.6 Alexander Polyhistor (ca 105-35 B.C.E.) 13 0.7 Diodorus Siculus (I B.C.E.) 16 0.8 Nicolaus of Damascus 19 0.9 Strabo (ca 64 B.C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Islām and Genesis 17
    religions Article Islam¯ and Genesis 17: A Study in Scriptural Intertextuality Khaleel Mohammed Department of Religious Studies, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-6062, USA; [email protected] Received: 25 August 2018; Accepted: 17 September 2018; Published: 28 September 2018 Abstract: Abraham Geiger’s 1833 essay launched a particular genre of research that posits foreign etymology for many terms in the Qur’an.¯ Whereas some work has been erudite, others have posited far-fetched concepts to the point where at least one author opines that Aramaic was the original language of the Qur’an.¯ Muslim exegetes have compounded the problem by seeking to interpret the Qur’an¯ on its own, without reference to other Abrahamic scriptures. I argue that Muhammad’s audience understood him clearly since he was using terms that had become part of the Arabic language long before his time. I examine three terms: islam,¯ iman,¯ and d¯ın, showing that the meaning of these words in the Qur’an¯ can be deciphered by reliance on context of usage and intertextuality. To this end, I refer to several verses of the Qur’an¯ as well as of the Hebrew Bible and Talmudic literature. A proper understanding of these words allows us to see Q3:19 and Q5:3 as pluralistic instead of the particularistic interpretation that most exegetes proffer. Keywords: Islam; Iman; Din; Qur’an;¯ Aramaic; Hebrew; Hebrew Bible; Talmud; Onkelos Abraham Geiger’s 1833 essay Was hat Muhammad aus dem Judenthume aufgenommen postulated that the Qur’an¯ was largely unoriginal: Muhammad had compiled it using at least 14 terms from the Hebrew Bible and rabbinic literature, in addition to several other Jewish concepts (Geiger 1970, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Hesiod Theogony.Pdf
    Hesiod (8th or 7th c. BC, composed in Greek) The Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, are probably slightly earlier than Hesiod’s two surviving poems, the Works and Days and the Theogony. Yet in many ways Hesiod is the more important author for the study of Greek mythology. While Homer treats cer- tain aspects of the saga of the Trojan War, he makes no attempt at treating myth more generally. He often includes short digressions and tantalizes us with hints of a broader tra- dition, but much of this remains obscure. Hesiod, by contrast, sought in his Theogony to give a connected account of the creation of the universe. For the study of myth he is im- portant precisely because his is the oldest surviving attempt to treat systematically the mythical tradition from the first gods down to the great heroes. Also unlike the legendary Homer, Hesiod is for us an historical figure and a real per- sonality. His Works and Days contains a great deal of autobiographical information, in- cluding his birthplace (Ascra in Boiotia), where his father had come from (Cyme in Asia Minor), and the name of his brother (Perses), with whom he had a dispute that was the inspiration for composing the Works and Days. His exact date cannot be determined with precision, but there is general agreement that he lived in the 8th century or perhaps the early 7th century BC. His life, therefore, was approximately contemporaneous with the beginning of alphabetic writing in the Greek world. Although we do not know whether Hesiod himself employed this new invention in composing his poems, we can be certain that it was soon used to record and pass them on.
    [Show full text]
  • MA Thesis Copy
    MA Thesis Greek Lund University Centre for Languages and Literature Spring Term 2010 Septuagintal hapax legomena and neologisms in 2 Maccabees, 4-7 Nikolaos Domazakis Supervisor: Professor Karin Blomqvist ii ABSTRACT 2 Maccabees, an intertestamental Jewish historiographic work, is a case apart among the books preserved in the Greek translation of the Bible, the Septuagint: it is Biblical in its content, but Greek in its form. This particularity is manifest in its language, which differs markedly from the ‘translationese’ Greek of most other books of the Septuagint. The rich and varied vocabulary the author employs is rather to be compared with that of the best specimens of Hellenistic Greek historiography. The present study examines the vocabulary of 2 Maccabees, 4-7 from two aspects: that of rarity, evidenced in words occurring in this book and nowhere else in the Septuagint (LXX hapax legomena), and that of novelty, attested in new words appearing for the first time in this book (neologisms). A detailed commentary of this vocabulary seeks to trace its links with both the classical language and the contemporary Koine of the Hellenistic inscriptions and papyri, and relate the author’s lexical choices to his stylistic and rhetorical aspirations. Keywords: 2 Maccabees, hapax legomena, neologisms, Septuagint ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply grateful to my supervisor, Professor Karin Blomqvist, who kindled my interest in Hellenistic literature, encouraged me to write this thesis, and generously assisted me, both scientifically and personally, throughout my Greek studies. I am also indebted to Emeritus Professor Jerker Blomqvist, who directed my attention to 2 Maccabees, and to all my teachers in the Department of Linguistics at Lund University.
    [Show full text]
  • (Getting Rid of the «Presocratics»), In: Philosophy in the Dialogue of Cultures
    Andrei V. Lebedev, Izbavliaias’ ot «dosokratikov» (Getting rid of the «Presocratics»), in: Philosophy in the dialogue of cultures. Materials of the World Philosophy Day (Moscow - St. Petersburg, November 16 -19, 2009), p. 177 - 183 (in Russian). Translated into English by the author. This paper was delivered in the Institute of philosophy of the Russian Academy of sciences at the Round Table «Getting rid of stereotypes in the history of philosophy». Some explanatory remarks that have been added in the English translation are placed in square brackets. In 1903 the Weidmann Publishing House in Berlin published the first edition of Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker by the distinguished German classical scholar Hermann Diels which still remains the most complete single edition of the fragments of the Early Greek philosophers (of the VI - V centuries B.C.). In the first edition it started with Thales and ended with «Anhang» that contained pre-philosophical tradition (cosmogonic poetry and prose, the sayings of the Seven Sages) as well as the fragments of the Sophists. After Diels’s death (1922) his disciple Walter Kranz in the last 5th edition (1934) gave it its present structure by dividing the whole text into three parts: A) Anfänge (pre-philosophical tradition), B) Fragments of the Greek Philosophers of the 6th and 5th centuries and their immediate followers and C) Sophists. There are all in all 90 chapters, in which about 400 names are mentioned, of which 235 derive from Jamblichus’ Catalogue of Pythagoreans. Diels himself explained in the preface to the first edition that he included in his collection also some mathematicians and a selection of non-Hippocratic doctors.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermeneutical Outlines in and of Dante's Legal Theory
    Hermeneutical Outlines in and of Dante’s Legal Theory Francesco Cavinato JD Candidate, University of Bologna Abstract: Based upon the concept of Law qualified in Monarchia, II.50, Dante was not only a general philosopher (a lover of knowledge) as well as a political disputant in his times, but also his primary contribution (not always obvious) in legal speculation could be demonstrated. In fact, if his thought reflected the platonic ordo sapientiae through a deep intersection between téchne and episteme (phronesis) toward a linguistic koiné, could we say the same thing on his concept of justice as a rational ars boni et aequi? This essay aims to depict Dante as legal theorist of his times and theorist of Justice beyond them, adopting the hermeneutical point of view, not just as an interest into textual interpretation but referring his use of language as form of life and his works an inexhaustible sources of education for legal philosophy. Keywords: Dante Alighieri; The Divine Comedy; Monarchia; Post-Aristotelian Philosophy; Counterpass; Synallagma; Theory of Law; Theory of Punishment; Hermeneutics. Table of Contents: Introduction ; 1. Dante and his time; 2. Elements of Dante’s legal theory; 3. The holistic feature of Dante’s legal theory. §§§ Introduction This essay is structured into three parties, which are strongly interconnected not only in relation to the subject, but also to the method I have chosen to adopt: the hermeneutical1 (or interpretivist2) approach, for which an ecdotic sense in the text – object3 (and in the reality as well) does not exist, but a vital relation 1 “The term hermeneutics covers both the first order art and the second order theory of understanding and interpretation of linguistic and non- linguistic expressions.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Moses/Musaeus/Mochos and His
    University of Groningen Moses/Musaeus/Mochos and his God Yahweh, Iao, and Sabaoth, seen from a Graeco- Roman perspective van Kooten, G.H. Published in: The revelation of the name YHWH to Moses IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2006 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Kooten, G. H. (2006). Moses/Musaeus/Mochos and his God Yahweh, Iao, and Sabaoth, seen from a Graeco-Roman perspective. In G. H. V. Kooten (Ed.), The revelation of the name YHWH to Moses: Perspectives from Judaism, the pagan Graeco-Roman world, and early christianity (pp. 107-138). (Themes in Biblical Narrative; No. 9). Brill. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • The Issue of Antitrinitarianism in the Fifteenth-Century Novgorod- Moscow Movement: Analysis and Evaluation
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2000 The Issue of Antitrinitarianism in the Fifteenth-Century Novgorod- Moscow Movement: Analysis and Evaluation Oleg Zhigankov Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the History of Christianity Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, and the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Zhigankov, Oleg, "The Issue of Antitrinitarianism in the Fifteenth-Century Novgorod-Moscow Movement: Analysis and Evaluation" (2000). Dissertations. 172. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/172 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMi films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bieedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Do the Multi-Religious Origins of Islam Lie? a Topological Approach to a Wicked Problem
    9 (2019) Article 6: 165-210 Where Do the Multi-Religious Origins of Islam Lie? A Topological Approach to a Wicked Problem MANFRED SING Leibniz Institute of European History, Mainz, Germany This contribution to Entangled Religions is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0 International). The license can be accessed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Entangled Religions 9 (2019) http://doi.org/10.13154/er.v9.2019.165–210 Where Do the Multi-Religious Origins of Islam Lie? Where Do the Multi-Religious Origins of Islam Lie? A Topological Approach to a Wicked Problem MANFRED SING Leibniz Institute of European History ABSTRACT The revelation of Islam in Arabic, its emergence in the Western Arabian Peninsula, and its acquaintance with Biblical literature seem to be clear indications for Islam’s birthplace and its religious foundations. While the majority of academic scholarship accepts the historicity of the revelation in Mecca and Medina, revisionist scholars have started questioning the location of early Islam with increasing fervour in recent years. Drawing on the isolation of Mecca and the lack of clear references to Mecca in ancient and non-Muslim literature before the mid-eighth century, these scholars have cast doubt on the claim that Mecca was already a trading outpost and a pilgrimage site prior to Islam, questioning the traditional Islamic and Orientalist view. Space, thus, plays a prominent role in the debate on the origins of Islam, although space is almost never conceptually discussed. In the following paper, I challenge the limited understanding of space in revisionist as well as mainstream scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Qurʾa¯N
    The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Qurʾa¯n The Wiley Blackwell Companions to Religion The Wiley Blackwell Companions to Religion series presents a collection of the most recent scholarship and knowledge about world religions. Each volume draws together newly commissioned essays by distinguished authors in the field, and is presented in a style which is accessible to undergraduate students, as well as scholars and the interested general reader. These volumes approach the subject in a creative and forward‐thinking style, providing a forum in which leading scholars in the field can make their views and research available to a wider audience. Recently Published The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth‐Century Theology Edited by David Fergusson The Blackwell Companion to Religion in America Edited by Philip Goff The Blackwell Companion to Jesus Edited by Delbert Burkett The Blackwell Companion to Paul Edited by Stephen Westerholm The Blackwell Companion to Religion and Violence Edited by Andrew R. Murphy The Blackwell Companion to Christian Ethics, Second Edition Edited by Stanley Hauerwas and Samuel Wells The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Practical Theology Edited by Bonnie J. Miller‐McLemore The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Religion and Social Justice Edited by Michael D. Palmer and Stanley M. Burgess The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Chinese Religions Edited by Randall L. Nadeau The Wiley Blackwell Companion to African Religions Edited by Elias Kifon Bongmba The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Christian Mysticism Edited by Julia A. Lamm The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Anglican Communion Edited by Ian S. Markham, J. Barney Hawkins IV, Justyn Terry, and Leslie Nuñez Steffensen The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Interreligious Dialogue Edited by Catherine Cornille The Wiley Blackwell Companion to East and Inner Asian Buddhism Edited by Mario Poceski The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Latino/a Theology Edited by Orlando O.
    [Show full text]