DOCSLIB.ORG

The Issue of Antitrinitarianism in the Fifteenth-Century Novgorod- Moscow Movement: Analysis and Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Issue of Antitrinitarianism in the Fifteenth-Century Novgorod- Moscow Movement: Analysis and Evaluation Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2000 The Issue of Antitrinitarianism in the Fifteenth-Century Novgorod- Moscow Movement: Analysis and Evaluation Oleg Zhigankov Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the History of Christianity Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, and the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Zhigankov, Oleg, "The Issue of Antitrinitarianism in the Fifteenth-Century Novgorod-Moscow Movement: Analysis and Evaluation" (2000). Dissertations. 172. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/172 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMi films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bieedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary THE ISSUE OF ANTITRINITARIANISM IN THE FIFTEENTH- CENTURY NOVGOROD-MOSCOW MOVEMENT: ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Oleg Zhigankov December 2000 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 9992446 __UMI ___ __ ® UMI Microform 9992446 Copyright 2001 by Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyrightowner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE ISSUE OF ANTITRINITARIANISM IN THE FIFTEENTH- CENTURY NOVGOROD-MOSCOW MOVEMENT ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION A Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy by Oleg Zhigankov APPROVAL BY THE COMMITTEE: ^ _______ Faculty Adviser, Dirpbtor, Ph.D./Th.D Miroslav KiS Randall W. Younker Professor of Ethics i 's ■__________ J. H. Denis Fortin • Dean, SDA Associate Professor of Theology John K. McVay \V L cry>\ Associate Profi of Church History Associate Professor of History j s — Q oQ LC . 0 * 0 0 0 Paul Meyendorff Date approved Professor of Liturgicalliturgical THeology ' St. Vladimir’s Theological Seminary Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT THE ISSUE OF ANTITRINITARIANISM IN THE FIFTEENTH- CENTURY NOVGOROD-MOSCOW MOVEMENT: ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION by Oleg Zhigankov Adviser: Miroslav M. KiS Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE ISSUE OF ANTITRINITARIANISM IN THE FIFTEENTH- CENTURY NOVGOROD-MOSCOW MOVEMENT: ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION Name of researcher: Oleg Zhigankov Name and degree of faculty adviser: Miroslav M. Ki§, Ph.D. Date completed: December 2000 This study attempts to examine the trinitarian beliefs o f the fifteenth-century Novgorod-Moscow movement, analyzing both their own writings and the polemical writings of those who considered their teaching antitrinitarian. The main objective of the present research is to contribute to the restoration of the authentic theological identity o f this movement. Chapter 1 defines the problem, which has already been raised by some nineteenth-century scholars who have pointed out that the allegedly antitrinitarian character of the Subbotniks’ movement must be open for further discussion. It also shows that no systematic research on Subbotniks’ theology has ever been produced. permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. The second chapter of this historical-theological study surveys the historical background of the Novgorod-Moscow movement and briefly analyzes the religious, political, and cultural context of fifteenth-century Russia. It demonstrates that the struggle surrounding this movement was motivated not only theologically, but also politically and culturally. Chapter 3 analyzes the polemical documents, giving priority to the primary sources contemporary to the Novgorod-Moscow movement, such as Archbishop Gennadii’s letters and Iosif of Volotsk’s Instructor. In general, the documents presented in this chapter differ in their charges o f antitrinitarianism against the Subbotniks. Chapter 4 analyzes the Subbotniks’ sources, which include all the passages directly or indirectly dealing with their trinitarian views. The writings of the Subbotniks in general represent the trends common for European reform movements of the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. The study of the Subbotniks’ literature shows that the antitrinitarian character o f this movement cannot be confirmed by the writings o f the Subbotniks themselves. Chapter 5 presents a systematic-analytical and historical evaluation of the question of the trinitarian status of the Novgorod-Moscow movement. The present research found no traces of antitrinitarianism in the Subbotniks’ movement. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. To my dear wife Elena and my children Akim and Sasha iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................... ix Chapter I. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 Background of the Problem ..........................................................................................1 Statement of the Problem ..............................................................................................6 Purpose and Justification of the Research................................................................... 6 Viability of the Research ..............................................................................................8 Scope/Delimitations.......................................................................................................9 Methodology..................................................................................................................9 Primary Sources............................................................................................................10 Works Opposing the Novgorod-Moscow Movement ................................ 10 Letters of Archbishop Gennadii (Gonosov) and Related Sources ....................................................................10 Writings of Iosif of Volotsk ............................................................. 12 Penitence by the Heretic D enis.........................................................13 Sentence of the 1490 Council ...........................................................13 Voskresensk Chronicle of 1492 ...................................................... 13 Letter of Monk S a w a ........................................................................ 14 Works from within the Novgorod-Moscow Movement ..............................14 Books Found Among the Subbotniks ..............................................14 Books Written by the Subbotniks .................................................... 15 Writings of Fedor Kuritsin...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Christian Mission in a Russian Orthodox Context
    EAST -WE ST CHUR C H MINISTRY RE PORT &FALL 2014 Vol. 22, No. 4 Christian Mission in a Russian Orthodox Context Walter Sawatsky Christian mission in Orthodox lands is a 2000- significantly different church-state experiences of year-old story, generally unknown in the West Orthodox and evangelicals during the Soviet era. and still unexplored sufficiently for the purpose of Perhaps the most profound difference was that Contributing Editors Christian mission in post-Communist states. Because following the October Revolution, the first action Canon Michael Bourdeaux of Orthodox repression under Islamic and Soviet of Soviet authorities was to declare the separation Keston Institute, overlords, and a stifling tsarist bear hug in between, of the churches from the state. The new regime also Oxford public perception has not yet perceived Orthodoxy as refused the legal right of juridical personhood to all a missionary church. religious bodies, including the newly established Dr. Anita Deyneka Russian Patriarchate, calling into question the future Peter Deyneka Russian The Babylonian Captivity Even if the Russian Orthodox Mission Society, of all organized religious life. Orthodox experienced Ministries, the first decade of Soviet power as an outright Wheaton, Illinois founded in 1865, achieved impressive results in the spread of Christianity across major tribal peoples of war on the church, specifically the destruction of Father Georgi Edelstein Siberia and in East Asia, Russian Orthodox leadership Orthodox institutions, until in 1927 acting patriarch Russian Orthodox Church, came to refer to the period from 1721 to 1917 as the Sergei declared full loyalty to Soviet power without Kostroma Diocese era of the “Babylonian Captivity.” As a modernizing reservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sergei A. Mudrov
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE SERGEI A. MUDROV THE CONFRONTATION, INTIMIDATION AND NEW DIVISIONS? A CONTROVERSIAL PATH TO THE CREATION OF THE AUTOCEPHALOUS ORTHODOX CHURCH IN UKRAINE Sergei A. Mudrov Polotsk State University, Department of Social Communications, Belarus. Email: [email protected] Abstract: This article analyses the establishment of the autocephalous Orthodox Church in Ukraine. It explains the main steps that were taken in Ukraine towards obtaining auto- cephaly for the Orthodox Church, namely for two non-canonical groups — ‘Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church’ and ‘Ukrainian Orthodox Church -- Kiev Patriarchate’, which formally merged in December 2018. A special attention is devoted to the analysis of the events in 2018, starting from the April 2018 request of the Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, addressed to the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomeos. I argue that the move towards autocephaly was dictated primarily by politico-ideological reasons and was accom- panied by the rise of confrontation and a lack of cooperation. The majority of Orthodox, belonging to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate), opposed this process, which made them the subject of intimidation campaigns. It appears that in Ukraine there is an ongoing process of constructing a “radical other”, and much effort is being devoted to making the Ukrainian Orthodox Church this “radical other”, since the actions of this Church have been often interpreted in the most negative ways. Overall, the move towards autocephaly, instead of uniting Ukrainians, has brought about new dividing lines in Ukraine and has contributed to the split in global Orthodoxy. Key words: Orthodox Church; identity; religion; Ukraine; autocephaly; Ecumenical Patri- archate; Moscow Patriarchate.
    [Show full text]
  • Stabilisation of Movable Feasts
    [Communicated to the Council and the Members of the League.] Official N o.: C. 335. M. 154. 1934. VIII. Geneva. August 3rd, 1934. LEAGUE OF NATIONS ORGANISATION FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSIT STABILISATION OF MOVABLE FEASTS SUMMARY OF REPLIES FROM RELIGIOUS AUTHORITIES TO THE LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS COMMUNICATING THE ACT REGARDING THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF FIXING MOVABLE FEASTS I. — COMMUNICATION OF THE ACT TO THE RELIGIOUS AUTHORITIES. According to the instructions of the Council, the Secretary-General brought the Act regarding the economic and social aspects of fixing movable feasts, adopted by the Fourth General Conference on Communications and Transit, to the notice of the Christian Religious Authorities, asking them to consider as favourably as possible what action they could “take in the matter. As far as the Holy See is concerned, the Act was communicated by letter from the Secretary-General of the League to the Secretary of State of His Holiness on November 16th, As regards Christian Churches other than the Roman Catholic Church, a request was addressed on November 16th, 1932, to the President of the Universal Christian Council for Life and Work, to which all these Churches are affiliated, asking him to bring the above-mentioned Act to their knowledge and to inform the Secretary-General of the League of the views expressed by the Churches in the matter. II. — RESULTS OF THE ENQUIRY. 1. — Attitude of the Holy See. By letter dated December 30th, 1932, Cardinal Pacelli informed the Secretary-General that the Holy bee maintains the point of view already expressed in previous communications — i.e., that the stabilisation of Easter is a pre-eminently religious question which falls within the competence of the Holy See and that, for reasons of higher spiritual concern, the Holy ?>ee cannot contemplate a change in this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • An Old Believer ―Holy Moscow‖ in Imperial Russia: Community and Identity in the History of the Rogozhskoe Cemetery Old Believers, 1771 - 1917
    An Old Believer ―Holy Moscow‖ in Imperial Russia: Community and Identity in the History of the Rogozhskoe Cemetery Old Believers, 1771 - 1917 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Doctoral Degree of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Peter Thomas De Simone, B.A., M.A Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Nicholas Breyfogle, Advisor David Hoffmann Robin Judd Predrag Matejic Copyright by Peter T. De Simone 2012 Abstract In the mid-seventeenth century Nikon, Patriarch of Moscow, introduced a number of reforms to bring the Russian Orthodox Church into ritualistic and liturgical conformity with the Greek Orthodox Church. However, Nikon‘s reforms met staunch resistance from a number of clergy, led by figures such as the archpriest Avvakum and Bishop Pavel of Kolomna, as well as large portions of the general Russian population. Nikon‘s critics rejected the reforms on two key principles: that conformity with the Greek Church corrupted Russian Orthodoxy‘s spiritual purity and negated Russia‘s historical and Christian destiny as the Third Rome – the final capital of all Christendom before the End Times. Developed in the early sixteenth century, what became the Third Rome Doctrine proclaimed that Muscovite Russia inherited the political and spiritual legacy of the Roman Empire as passed from Constantinople. In the mind of Nikon‘s critics, the Doctrine proclaimed that Constantinople fell in 1453 due to God‘s displeasure with the Greeks. Therefore, to Nikon‘s critics introducing Greek rituals and liturgical reform was to invite the same heresies that led to the Greeks‘ downfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Bogomils of Bulgaria and Bosnia
    BOGOMILS OF BULGARIA AND BOSNIA The Early Protestants of the East. AN ATTEMPT TO RESTORE SOME LOST LEAVES OF PROTESTANT HISTORY. BY L. P. BROCKETT, M. D. Author of: "The Cross and the Crescent," "History of Religious Denominations," etc. PHILADELPHIA AMERICAN BAPTIST PUBLICATION SOCIETY, 1420 CHESTNUT STREET. Entered to Act of Congress, in the year 1879, by the AMERICAN BAPTIST PUBLICATION SOCIETY, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. CONTENTS _______ SECTION I. Introduction.—The Armenian and other Oriental churches. SECTION II. Dualism and the phantastic theory of our Lord's advent in the Oriental churches —The doctrines they rejected.—They held to baptism. SECTION III. Gradual decline of the dualistic doctrine —The holy and exemplary lives of the Paulicians. SECTION IV. The cruelty and bloodthirstiness of the Empress Theodora —The free state and city of Tephrice. SECTION V. The Sclavonic development of the Catharist or Paulician churches.—Bulgaria, Bosnia, and Servia its principal seats —Euchites, Massalians, and Bogomils SECTION VI. The Bulgarian Empire and its Bogomil czars. SECTION VII. A Bogomil congregation and its worship —Mostar, on the Narenta. SECTION VIII. The Bogomilian doctrines and practices —The Credentes and Perfecti —Were the Credentes baptized? SECTION IX. The orthodoxy of the Greek and Roman churches rather theological than practical —Fall of the Bulgarian Empire. SECTION X. The Emperor Alexius Comnenus and the Bogomil Elder Basil —The Alexiad of the Princess Anna Comnena. SECTION XI. The martyrdom of Basil —The Bogomil churches reinforced by the Armenian Paulicians under the Emperor John Zimisces. SECTION XII. The purity of life of the Bogomils —Their doctrines and practices —Their asceticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance on Russia's Early-Modern Frontier
    ABSOLUTISM AND EMPIRE: GOVERNANCE ON RUSSIA’S EARLY-MODERN FRONTIER DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Matthew Paul Romaniello, B. A., M. A. The Ohio State University 2003 Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Eve Levin, Advisor Dr. Geoffrey Parker Advisor Dr. David Hoffmann Department of History Dr. Nicholas Breyfogle ABSTRACT The conquest of the Khanate of Kazan’ was a pivotal event in the development of Muscovy. Moscow gained possession over a previously independent political entity with a multiethnic and multiconfessional populace. The Muscovite political system adapted to the unique circumstances of its expanding frontier and prepared for the continuing expansion to its east through Siberia and to the south down to the Caspian port city of Astrakhan. Muscovy’s government attempted to incorporate quickly its new land and peoples within the preexisting structures of the state. Though Muscovy had been multiethnic from its origins, the Middle Volga Region introduced a sizeable Muslim population for the first time, an event of great import following the Muslim conquest of Constantinople in the previous century. Kazan’s social composition paralleled Moscow’s; the city and its environs contained elites, peasants, and slaves. While the Muslim elite quickly converted to Russian Orthodoxy to preserve their social status, much of the local population did not, leaving Moscow’s frontier populated with animists and Muslims, who had stronger cultural connections to their nomadic neighbors than their Orthodox rulers. The state had two major goals for the Middle Volga Region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rebirth of Religion in Russia
    View of the Holy of Holies of Russia, showing the high wall and lofty watch-towers which enclose it. Originally a fort, the Kremlin is now a museum, mausoleum, and treasure-house of things precious in Russian life and Russian religion. In no other equal area in the world ANNALS OF HISTORY is there crowded such an array of historic cathedrals THE REBIrtH OF RELIGION IN RUSSIA and monaster- ies, sacred relics, trophies of war, The Church Reorganized While Bolshevik Cannons sacerdotal robes, gold and silver Spread Destruction in the Nation’s vessels, precious Holy of Holies stones, pearls, and jewels to the value of millions of Y HOMAS HITTEMORE dollars, etc. B T W Note: The text, he Holy Kremlin of Moscow has During the bombardment a Chinese photographs, and Tbecome a Bolshevik fortress. From workman, looking on, was heard to captions of this ar- the 9th to the 16th of November, 1917, say, “The Russian is not good; bad ticle were originally published in National for more than seven days under a man; he shoots on his God.” Geographic 34:5 hurricane of fire, the city was stormed (November 1918): and finally carried by the Bolsheviks Outraged and despoiled, the Kremlin 378–401. in terrible fratricidal war. Since then is in bonds today, guarded by foreign the sacred citadel has been playing a mercenaries. The forty times forty new and ignominious role in the his- churches of the white stone city seem tory of Russia. to draw a little closer in answer to the trumpet calls of the Kremlin domes.
    [Show full text]
  • DEATH and DYING in EARLY MODERN RUSSIA Daniel H. Kaiser
    DEATH AND DYING IN EARLY MODERN RUSSIA Daniel H. Kaiser Professor of Social Studies Grinnell College Daniel H. Kaiser is the Joseph F. Rosenfield Professor of Social Studies and a Professor of History at Grinnell College in Iowa. Dr. Kaiser's previous publications include The Growth of Law in MedievaL Russia (Princeton, 1980}, as well as a number of articles on the legal history of Muscovite and Kievan Russia. He is the editor of The Workers' RevoLution in Russia, 1917: The View from BeLow (Cambridge, 1987). As a Kennan Institute Research fellow in 1986, Dr. Kaiser completed Marriage and the FamiLy in EarLy Modern Russia (forth- coming). "Death and Dying in Early Modern Russia," an excerpt from that work, was delivered at a colloquium on May 22, 1986, at the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies. The author gratefully acknowledges support from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, the Kennan Institute, and Grinnell College, and extends special thanks to his Kennan Institute assistant, Susan Conwell, and to his Grinnell College student assistants, Kina Carpino and Brian McMahon, for data entry and graphics preparation. DEATH AND DYING IN EARLY MODERN RUSSIA Daniel H. Kaiser Professor of Social Studies Grinnell College Daniel H. Kaiser is the Joseph F. Rosenfield Professor of Social Studies and a Professor of History at Grinnell College in Iowa. Dr. Kaiser's previous publications include The Growth of Law in MedievaL Russia (Princeton, 1980), as well as a number of articles on the legal history of Muscovite and Kievan Russia. He is the editor of The Workers' Revolution in Russia, 1917: The View from BeLow (Cambridge, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • St. Xenia Parish News 170 North Lowell Street, Methuen, MA 01844 November - December 2018
    St. Xenia Parish News 170 North Lowell Street, Methuen, MA 01844 November - December 2018 Metropolitan ONUPHRY: Man’s Main Task Is To Rule Not The World But His Own Heart Belaya Tserkov, October 29, 2018 is Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of He also noted that few are those who strive to live Kiev and All Ukraine, the primate of the according to God’s Word, and thus few are those H Ukrainian Orthodox Church, offered a who bring forth good fruits. Such are atheists and word on the parable of the sower (Mt. 13:3-23) in those who do not renounce God but constantly his Sunday homily given at St. Mary Magdalene complain and accuse Him of injustice. Monastery in the city of Belaya Tserkov (White “We must not say that we deserve a better fate, Church) in which he emphasized that man’s main because we thereby blaspheme God, we insult task in life is to “work on his spiritual develop- God. We must always thank Him and say, ‘Lord, I ment.” know that I have received more than I deserve, The Ukrainian primate also added that it is prayer, because I am worthy of nothing.’ When God sees fasting, and living according to the Divine com- such humility, then … He sends man everything mandments that help a man attain spiritual perfec- he needs for life,” the Ukrainian archpastor ex- tion, “in cleansing the heart of sin and cruelty,” plained. reports the site of the Ukrainian Orthodox This also includes those who believe in God but Church. not trust Him with their lives and constantly put “Some say that the greatest work is to be a politi- off correcting their lives: “These people accept the cian, to direct the world to the right and to the Word of God when they are praised for it, but left.
    [Show full text]
  • Preložené Ako Inšpirácia Pre Tých, Ktorí Hľadajú Odpovede V Chaose a Despovláde Parazitov
    Preložené ako inšpirácia pre tých, ktorí hľadajú odpovede v chaose a despovláde parazitov. http://chronologia.org/en/how_it_was/index.html А.Т. Фоменко - Как было на самом деле. Каждая история желает быть рассказанной 1 / 423 Table of Contents Predslov..............................................................................................................................................10 1. Všeobecne prijatá verzia svetovej histórie bola vytvorená len v xvii storočí. Bola upravovaná až do 19. Storočia - táto verzia je nesprávna.................................................................................10 2. Psychologické poznámky..........................................................................................................16 Epocha pred xi. Storočím...................................................................................................................17 Kapitola 1. Epoch xi. storočia............................................................................................................19 1. Prvé románske kráľovstvo starého Rímu...................................................................................19 2. Astronomické záznamy novej chronológie................................................................................20 Kapitola 2. Epocha xii. storočia.........................................................................................................22 1. Druhý Rím alebo rímska cár-grad ríša. Yoros = Jeruzalem = Trója..........................................22 2. Narodenie krista
    [Show full text]
  • Russia and Siberia: the Beginning of the Penetration of Russian People Into Siberia, the Campaign of Ataman Yermak and It’S Consequences
    The Aoyama Journal of International Politics, Economics and Communication, No. 106, May 2021 CCCCCCCCC Article CCCCCCCCC Russia and Siberia: The Beginning of the Penetration of Russian People into Siberia, the Campaign of Ataman Yermak and it’s Consequences Aleksandr A. Brodnikov* Petr E. Podalko** The penetration of the Russian people into Siberia probably began more than a thousand years ago. Old Russian chronicles mention that already in the 11th century, the northwestern part of Siberia, then known as Yugra1), was a “volost”2) of the Novgorod Land3). The Novgorod ush- * Associate Professor, Novosibirsk State University ** Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University 1) Initially, Yugra was the name of the territory between the mouth of the river Pechora and the Ural Mountains, where the Finno-Ugric tribes historically lived. Gradually, with the advancement of the Russian people to the East, this territorial name spread across the north of Western Siberia to the river Taz. Since 2003, Yugra has been part of the offi cial name of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug: Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug—Yugra. 2) Volost—from the Old Russian “power, country, district”—means here the territo- rial-administrative unit of the aboriginal population with the most authoritative leader, the chief, from whom a certain amount of furs was collected. 3) Novgorod Land (literally “New City”) refers to a land, also known as “Gospodin (Lord) Veliky (Great) Novgorod”, or “Novgorod Republic”, with its administrative center in Veliky Novgorod, which had from the 10th century a tendency towards autonomy from Kiev, the capital of Ancient Kievan Rus. From the end of the 11th century, Novgorod de-facto became an independent city-state that subdued the entire north of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Legami Culturali Tra La Russia E L'italia in Architettura
    SCUOLA SUPERIORE PER MEDIATORI LINGUISTICI (Decreto Ministero dell’Università 31/07/2003) Via P. S. Mancini, 2 – 00196 - Roma TESI DI DIPLOMA DI MEDIATORE LINGUISTICO (Curriculum Interprete e Traduttore) Equipollente ai Diplomi di Laurea rilasciati dalle Università al termine dei Corsi afferenti alla classe delle LAUREE UNIVERSITARIE IN SCIENZE DELLA MEDIAZIONE LINGUISTICA Legami culturali tra la Russia e l’Italia in architettura RELATORE: CORRELATORI: prof.ssa Adriana Bisirri prof. Alfredo Rocca prof.ssa Claudia Piemonte prof.ssa Eleonora Malykhina CANDIDATA: OLGA MOSKALEVA MATRICOLA: 1826 ANNO ACCADEMICO 2015/2016 Ad Angelo Dulizia «L’indelebile importanza che gli architetti italiani hanno lasciato sia nel Cremlino di Mosca che nella città di San Pietroburgo è la migliore testimonianza di come l’Italia e la Russia siano unite da una tradizione di amicizia ricca e profonda» GIORGIO NAPOLITANO INDICE SEZIONE ITALIANA Introduzione ................................................................................................ 12 1. Presupposti per l’inizio delle relazioni con l’Italia............................ 16 1.1. Il carattere dell’architettura russa nel XII secolo .............................. 16 1.2. Il Cremlino di Mosca prima dell’inizio di collaborazione con i maestri italiani ....................................................................................................... 19 2. I rapporti italo-russi in architettura nei secoli XV – XVI ................... 21 2.1. L’arrivo a Mosca di Fioravanti. La ricostruzione della
    [Show full text]