Characterization of Six Arabidopsis AROGENATE DEHYDRATASE Promoters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Characterization of Six Arabidopsis AROGENATE DEHYDRATASE Promoters Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 11-3-2017 10:00 AM Characterization of six Arabidopsis AROGENATE DEHYDRATASE promoters Emily J. Cornelius The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Susanne E. Kohalmi The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Science © Emily J. Cornelius 2017 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Cornelius, Emily J., "Characterization of six Arabidopsis AROGENATE DEHYDRATASE promoters" (2017). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5081. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5081 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Phenylalanine is an important aromatic amino acid synthesized by higher plants, and is a major component of numerous specialized metabolites including structural components, pigments, and defense compounds. The last step in the synthesis of phenylalanine is catalyzed by an enzyme called AROGENATE DEHYDRATASE, of which there are six different isoenzymes encoded by the Arabidopsis genome. All six have specialized roles within the plant, and are differentially expressed during development and under stressful conditions. To deduce the potential specialized role of each ADT, unique patterns of regulatory motifs were identified for all six ADT promoters, as well as corresponding transcription factors with similar expression profiles to each enzyme. Seven stable transgenic Arabidopsis lines were also generated using ADT promoter-eGFP/GUS constructs to test expression in all tissues during development, and under stressful conditions. Keywords Phenylalanine, specialized metabolism, arogenate dehydratase, cis regulatory motif, co-expression, transcriptional regulation i Acknowledgments Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Susanne Kohalmi, for her undying guidance, support, and mentorship throughout this thesis. Thank you for giving me the chance to learn, and for teaching me countless lessons about science, research, and life. I will be forever grateful for the opportunities you have given me along this entire journey. I would also like to thank my advisors, Dr. Norm Huner and Dr. Ryan Austin, for their much appreciated support and contributions throughout the process. Second, I would like to thank Emily Clayton, Sara Rad, and Caryn Dooner, not only for being the most wonderful lab mates, but also great friends. Your tireless support and encouragement means the world to me. Also thanks to Jessica Belcastro, Daniel Bour and Michelle Millones. Daily life in the lab would not have been the same without all of you. Third, I would like to thank my friends inside and outside the department, especially Tian Wu. Thank you for helping me realize my potential, and for keeping a smile on my face throughout every challenge. Thank you also to the rest of my friends for all the memories that I am so grateful to take with me from the last two years. I will truly miss watching ever major television event together. Finally, I would like to thank my family. Your unconditional love and support gives me the courage to persevere when times are at their most difficult. ii Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments ......................................................................................... ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………...vii List of Figures .............................................................................................. vii List of Appendices ..................................................................................... viii List of Abbreviations .................................................................................... ix 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Secondary Metabolism and the Phenylpropanoid Pathway ...................... 1 1.2 Phenylalanine Biosynthesis ....................................................................... 3 1.3 Arogenate Dehydratases ........................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Alternative Roles and Differential Expression ........................................ 7 1.4 Transcriptional Regulation in Eukaryotes .................................................. 8 1.5 Promoter Organization ............................................................................ 14 1.6 Duplications and Gene Family Evolution ................................................. 18 1.7 A Data Mining Approach to Gene Family Analysis .................................. 21 1.8 Research Questions, Experimental Design and Objectives .................... 23 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................... 24 2.1 Media, Solutions and Buffers .................................................................. 24 2.1.1 Media .................................................................................................... 24 2.1.2 Solutions ............................................................................................... 24 2.1.3 Buffers .................................................................................................. 25 2.2 Bacterial Strains and Plasmids ................................................................ 25 2.2.1 Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions .............................................. 25 2.2.2 Plasmids ............................................................................................... 26 2.3 Plant Material and Standard Growth Conditions ..................................... 26 2.4 DNA Isolation .......................................................................................... 28 2.4.1 Plasmid DNA Isolation from Bacteria ................................................... 28 2.4.2 Plant Genomic DNA Isolation ............................................................... 28 2.5 PCR Amplification and Purification of ADT Promoter Regions ............... 28 iii 2.5.1 Primer Design and Sequence Amplification ......................................... 30 2.5.2 Gel Electrophoresis of PCR Products and DNA Extraction .................. 30 2.6 Gateway Cloning Procedure ................................................................... 30 2.7 Transformations ...................................................................................... 31 2.7.1 E. coli Transformations ......................................................................... 31 2.7.2 A. tumefaciens Transformations ........................................................... 31 2.7.3 N. benthamiana Transformations ......................................................... 34 2.7.4 A. thaliana Transformations ................................................................. 34 2.8 Seed Collection, Sterilization and Storage .............................................. 35 2.9 Histochemical Detection of GUS ............................................................. 35 2.10 Confocal Microscopy ............................................................................. 35 2.11 In Silico Methods ................................................................................... 36 2.11.1 Sequence Analyses ............................................................................ 36 2.11.2 Motif Pattern Analysis ......................................................................... 36 2.11.3 Co-expression Analysis ...................................................................... 37 3 RESULTS ................................................................................................... 38 3.1 In Silico Results ....................................................................................... 38 3.1.1 Sequence Analyses .............................................................................. 38 3.1.2 Regulatory Motif Categories ................................................................. 41 3.1.3 Proportions of Motif Categories in Each Promoter ............................... 45 3.1.4 Motifs Common to all Promoters .......................................................... 45 3.1.5 Unique Motifs ....................................................................................... 51 3.1.6 Significantly Enriched Motifs ................................................................ 58 3.1.7 Co-expression Results ......................................................................... 67 3.2 Cloning and Expression of ADT Promoter-Reporter Constructs. ............ 76 3.2.1 Promoter Sequence Amplification from gDNA ..................................... 79 3.2.2 Construct Confirmation ......................................................................... 80 3.2.3 Transient Expression by ADT Promoter Sequences ............................ 80 3.2.4 Stable Transformations of Arabidopsis ................................................ 89 4 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................. 92 4.1 ADT Regulation and Alternative Roles ...................................................
Recommended publications
  • Yeast Genome Gazetteer P35-65
    gazetteer Metabolism 35 tRNA modification mitochondrial transport amino-acid metabolism other tRNA-transcription activities vesicular transport (Golgi network, etc.) nitrogen and sulphur metabolism mRNA synthesis peroxisomal transport nucleotide metabolism mRNA processing (splicing) vacuolar transport phosphate metabolism mRNA processing (5’-end, 3’-end processing extracellular transport carbohydrate metabolism and mRNA degradation) cellular import lipid, fatty-acid and sterol metabolism other mRNA-transcription activities other intracellular-transport activities biosynthesis of vitamins, cofactors and RNA transport prosthetic groups other transcription activities Cellular organization and biogenesis 54 ionic homeostasis organization and biogenesis of cell wall and Protein synthesis 48 plasma membrane Energy 40 ribosomal proteins organization and biogenesis of glycolysis translation (initiation,elongation and cytoskeleton gluconeogenesis termination) organization and biogenesis of endoplasmic pentose-phosphate pathway translational control reticulum and Golgi tricarboxylic-acid pathway tRNA synthetases organization and biogenesis of chromosome respiration other protein-synthesis activities structure fermentation mitochondrial organization and biogenesis metabolism of energy reserves (glycogen Protein destination 49 peroxisomal organization and biogenesis and trehalose) protein folding and stabilization endosomal organization and biogenesis other energy-generation activities protein targeting, sorting and translocation vacuolar and lysosomal
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Transcriptome and Metabolome Analyses to Understand the Dynamic Responses of Rice Plants to Attack by the Rice Stem
    Liu et al. BMC Plant Biology (2016) 16:259 DOI 10.1186/s12870-016-0946-6 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Combined transcriptome and metabolome analyses to understand the dynamic responses of rice plants to attack by the rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Qingsong Liu1†, Xingyun Wang1†, Vered Tzin2, Jörg Romeis1,3, Yufa Peng1 and Yunhe Li1* Abstract Background: Rice (Oryza sativa L.), which is a staple food for more than half of the world’s population, is frequently attacked by herbivorous insects, including the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis. C. suppressalis substantially reduces rice yields in temperate regions of Asia, but little is known about how rice plants defend themselves against this herbivore at molecular and biochemical level. Results: In the current study, we combined next-generation RNA sequencing and metabolomics techniques to investigate the changes in gene expression and in metabolic processes in rice plants that had been continuously fed by C. suppressalis larvae for different durations (0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h). Furthermore, the data were validated using quantitative real-time PCR. There were 4,729 genes and 151 metabolites differently regulated when rice plants were damaged by C. suppressalis larvae. Further analyses showed that defense-related phytohormones, transcript factors, shikimate-mediated and terpenoid-related secondary metabolism were activated, whereas the growth-related counterparts were suppressed by C. suppressalis feeding. The activated defense was fueled by catabolism of energy storage compounds such as monosaccharides, which meanwhile resulted in the increased levels of metabolites that were involved in rice plant defense response. Comparable analyses showed a correspondence between transcript patterns and metabolite profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Arch Biochem Biophys
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Arch Biochem Biophys. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 November 01. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Arch Biochem Biophys. 2013 November 1; 539(1): . doi:10.1016/j.abb.2013.09.007. Redesign of MST enzymes to target lyase activity instead promotes mutase and dehydratase activities Kathleen M. Meneely, Qianyi Luo, and Audrey L. Lamb* Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 Abstract The isochorismate and salicylate synthases are members of the MST family of enzymes. The isochorismate synthases establish an equilibrium for the conversion chorismate to isochorismate and the reverse reaction. The salicylate synthases convert chorismate to salicylate with an isochorismate intermediate; therefore, the salicylate synthases perform isochorismate synthase and isochorismate-pyruvate lyase activities sequentially. While the active site residues are highly conserved, there are two sites that show trends for lyase-activity and lyase-deficiency. Using steady state kinetics and HPLC progress curves, we tested the “interchange” hypothesis that interconversion of the amino acids at these sites would promote lyase activity in the isochorismate synthases and remove lyase activity from the salicylate synthases. An alternative, “permute” hypothesis, that chorismate-utilizing enzymes are designed to permute the substrate into a variety of products and tampering with the active site may lead to identification of adventitious activities, is tested by more sensitive NMR time course experiments. The latter hypothesis held true. The variant enzymes predominantly catalyzed chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydratase activities, sequentially generating prephenate and phenylpyruvate, augmenting previously debated (mutase) or undocumented (dehydratase) adventitious activities.
    [Show full text]
  • When an Enzyme Isn't Just an Enzyme Anymore Extra Botany
    eXtra Botany Insight When an enzyme isn’t just an enzyme anymore Brenda S.J. Winkel Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA [email protected] In this issue (pages 1425–1440) Bross et al. provide evi- There are numerous other examples of glycolytic enzymes dence of surprising alternative functions for two iso- with alternative non-catalytic functions, though none as inten- forms of the plastid enzyme arogenate dehydratase. sively studied as GAPDH (Jeffery, 2014). The functions of This study points to a previously unsuspected con- these proteins range from serving as transcriptional regulators nection between central metabolism and chloroplast that are sensitive to sucrose concentrations to binding of plas- division and a potential new mechanism for retrograde minogen during microbial pathogenesis (Rolland et al., 2006; signaling. These findings add to a growing awareness He et al., 2013; Henderson and Martin, 2013; Vega et al., of the complexities of protein function that has sub- 2016). Dual functionality is also associated with enzymes of stantial implications for both basic and applied plant many other pathways of central metabolism, such as homoci- science. trate synthase, which is essential for lysine biosynthesis in mitochondria but can also mediate DNA repair in the nucleus We are in the midst of a paradigm shift in our understanding (Torres-Machorro et al., 2015). Aconitase is another well- of cellular metabolism, as growing numbers of proteins with established example, functioning not only as a key enzyme well-established catalytic roles are being found to have addi- in the TCA cycle, but also as an iron-responsive protein that tional, alternative functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 4. V. Cholerae Flexgene ORF Collection
    Table 4. V. cholerae FLEXGene ORF collection Reference Clone protein PlasmID clone GenBank Locus tag Symbol accession identifier FLEX clone name accession Product name VC0001 NP_062585 VcCD00019918 FLH200476.01F DQ772770 hypothetical protein VC0002 mioC NP_062586 VcCD00019938 FLH200506.01F DQ772771 mioC protein VC0003 thdF NP_062587 VcCD00019958 FLH200531.01F DQ772772 thiophene and furan oxidation protein ThdF VC0004 yidC NP_062588 VcCD00019970 FLH200545.01F DQ772773 inner membrane protein, 60 kDa VC0005 NP_062589 VcCD00061243 FLH236482.01F DQ899316 conserved hypothetical protein VC0006 rnpA NP_062590 VcCD00025697 FLH214799.01F DQ772774 ribonuclease P protein component VC0007 rpmH NP_062591 VcCD00061229 FLH236450.01F DQ899317 ribosomal protein L34 VC0008 NP_062592 VcCD00019917 FLH200475.01F DQ772775 amino acid ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein VC0009 NP_062593 VcCD00019966 FLH200540.01F DQ772776 amino acid ABC transproter, permease protein VC0010 NP_062594 VcCD00019152 FLH199275.01F DQ772777 amino acid ABC transporter, periplasmic amino acid-binding portion VC0011 NP_062595 VcCD00019151 FLH199274.01F DQ772778 hypothetical protein VC0012 dnaA NP_062596 VcCD00017363 FLH174286.01F DQ772779 chromosomal DNA replication initiator DnaA VC0013 dnaN NP_062597 VcCD00017316 FLH174063.01F DQ772780 DNA polymerase III, beta chain VC0014 recF NP_062598 VcCD00019182 FLH199319.01F DQ772781 recF protein VC0015 gyrB NP_062599 VcCD00025458 FLH174642.01F DQ772782 DNA gyrase, subunit B VC0016 NP_229675 VcCD00019198 FLH199346.01F DQ772783 hypothetical protein
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Protein Dynamics and Cofactor Interactions in Photosystem I
    A STUDY OF PROTEIN DYNAMICS AND COFACTOR INTERACTIONS IN PHOTOSYSTEM I A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty By Shana L. Bender In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorate of Philosophy in the School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology December 2008 A STUDY OF PROTEIN DYNAMICS AND COFACTOR INTERACTIONS IN PHOTOSYSTEM I Approved by: Dr. Bridgette Barry, Advisor Dr. Ingeborg Schmidt-Krey School of Chemistry and Biochemistry School of Biology Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Donald Doyle Dr. Nael McCarty School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Department of Pediatrics Georgia Institute of Technology Emory University Dr. Wendy Kelly School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: October 15, 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my parents, who have given my strength, moral support and practical advice throughout my educational endeavors. I would also like to thank my husband who has always put my goals and education above his own ambitions. I would like to acknowledge my entire family for their constant support in my education. I would like to thank my grandparents who have kept me in their prayers, and my sister who has never doubted my career goals. I would like to acknowledge my advisor, Dr. Bridgette Barry for her valuable support throughout the years. She has been a great advisor, always challenging me to think critically. She has helped me become a better scientist. I would like to thank the past members of the Barry group: Dr. Idelisa Ayala who trained me, Dr. Colette Sacksteder who taught me to be critical of everything, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Chandran Et Al. Supporting Info.Pdf
    Supporting Information (SI) Appendix Part 1. Impact of tissue preparation, LMD, and RNA amplification on array output. p. 2 Text S1: Detailed Experimental Design and Methods Figure S1A: Correlation analysis indicates tissue preparation has minimal impact on ATH1 array output. Figure S1B: Correlation analysis indicates RNA degradation does not significantly impact array output. Figure S1C: Correlation analysis indicates two-round amplification does not significantly impact array output. Figure S1D: Independent biological replicates of LMD samples are highly correlated. Figure S1E: Validation of LMD array expression by qPCR. Table S1: Tissue preparation-associated genes Part 2. Analysis of LMD and parallel whole leaf array data. p. 13 Table S2A: Known PM-impacted genes enriched in LMD dataset Table S2B: Dataset of LMD and whole leaf genes with PM-altered expression Table S2C: LMD PM MapMan Results and Bins Table S2D: ics1 vs. WT LMD PM MapMan Results and Bins Table S2E: Infection site-specific changes for redox and calcium categories Table S2F: cis-acting regulatory element motif analysis Part 3. Process network construction p. 149 3A. Photosynthesis 3B. Cold/dehydration response Part 4. Powdery mildew infection of WT and myb3r4 mutants p. 173 Text S4: Detailed Experimental Design and Methods (supplement to manuscript) Figure S4A. Uninfected 4 week old WT and myb3r4 plants Figure S4B. myb3r4 mutants exhibit reduced visible PM growth and reproduction Figure S4C. PM-infected WT and myb3r4 mutants do not exhibit cell death Figure S4D. Endoreduplication occurs at site of PM infection not distal to infection Figure S4E. Ploidy correlates with nuclear size. Part 1. Impact of tissue preparation, LMD, and RNA amplification on array output.
    [Show full text]
  • O O2 Enzymes Available from Sigma Enzymes Available from Sigma
    COO 2.7.1.15 Ribokinase OXIDOREDUCTASES CONH2 COO 2.7.1.16 Ribulokinase 1.1.1.1 Alcohol dehydrogenase BLOOD GROUP + O O + O O 1.1.1.3 Homoserine dehydrogenase HYALURONIC ACID DERMATAN ALGINATES O-ANTIGENS STARCH GLYCOGEN CH COO N COO 2.7.1.17 Xylulokinase P GLYCOPROTEINS SUBSTANCES 2 OH N + COO 1.1.1.8 Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase Ribose -O - P - O - P - O- Adenosine(P) Ribose - O - P - O - P - O -Adenosine NICOTINATE 2.7.1.19 Phosphoribulokinase GANGLIOSIDES PEPTIDO- CH OH CH OH N 1 + COO 1.1.1.9 D-Xylulose reductase 2 2 NH .2.1 2.7.1.24 Dephospho-CoA kinase O CHITIN CHONDROITIN PECTIN INULIN CELLULOSE O O NH O O O O Ribose- P 2.4 N N RP 1.1.1.10 l-Xylulose reductase MUCINS GLYCAN 6.3.5.1 2.7.7.18 2.7.1.25 Adenylylsulfate kinase CH2OH HO Indoleacetate Indoxyl + 1.1.1.14 l-Iditol dehydrogenase L O O O Desamino-NAD Nicotinate- Quinolinate- A 2.7.1.28 Triokinase O O 1.1.1.132 HO (Auxin) NAD(P) 6.3.1.5 2.4.2.19 1.1.1.19 Glucuronate reductase CHOH - 2.4.1.68 CH3 OH OH OH nucleotide 2.7.1.30 Glycerol kinase Y - COO nucleotide 2.7.1.31 Glycerate kinase 1.1.1.21 Aldehyde reductase AcNH CHOH COO 6.3.2.7-10 2.4.1.69 O 1.2.3.7 2.4.2.19 R OPPT OH OH + 1.1.1.22 UDPglucose dehydrogenase 2.4.99.7 HO O OPPU HO 2.7.1.32 Choline kinase S CH2OH 6.3.2.13 OH OPPU CH HO CH2CH(NH3)COO HO CH CH NH HO CH2CH2NHCOCH3 CH O CH CH NHCOCH COO 1.1.1.23 Histidinol dehydrogenase OPC 2.4.1.17 3 2.4.1.29 CH CHO 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 O 2.7.1.33 Pantothenate kinase CH3CH NHAC OH OH OH LACTOSE 2 COO 1.1.1.25 Shikimate dehydrogenase A HO HO OPPG CH OH 2.7.1.34 Pantetheine kinase UDP- TDP-Rhamnose 2 NH NH NH NH N M 2.7.1.36 Mevalonate kinase 1.1.1.27 Lactate dehydrogenase HO COO- GDP- 2.4.1.21 O NH NH 4.1.1.28 2.3.1.5 2.1.1.4 1.1.1.29 Glycerate dehydrogenase C UDP-N-Ac-Muramate Iduronate OH 2.4.1.1 2.4.1.11 HO 5-Hydroxy- 5-Hydroxytryptamine N-Acetyl-serotonin N-Acetyl-5-O-methyl-serotonin Quinolinate 2.7.1.39 Homoserine kinase Mannuronate CH3 etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortifying Horticultural Crops with Essential Amino Acids: a Review
    Review Fortifying Horticultural Crops with Essential Amino Acids: A Review Guoping Wang 1, Mengyun Xu 1, Wenyi Wang 1,2,* and Gad Galili 2,* 1 College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; [email protected] (G.W.); [email protected] (M.X.) 2 Department of Plant Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel * Corresponding author: [email protected] (W.W.); [email protected] (G.G.); Tel.: +972-8-934-3511 (G.G.); Fax: +972-8-934-4181 (G.G.) Received: 17 May 2017; Accepted: 14 June 2017; Published: 19 June 2017 Abstract: To feed the world′s growing population, increasing the yield of crops is not the only important factor, improving crop quality is also important, and it presents a significant challenge. Among the important crops, horticultural crops (particularly fruits and vegetables) provide numerous health compounds, such as vitamins, antioxidants, and amino acids. Essential amino acids are those that cannot be produced by the organism and, therefore, must be obtained from diet, particularly from meat, eggs, and milk, as well as a variety of plants. Extensive efforts have been devoted to increasing the levels of essential amino acids in plants. Yet, these efforts have been met with very little success due to the limited genetic resources for plant breeding and because high essential amino acid content is generally accompanied by limited plant growth. With a deep understanding of the biosynthetic pathways of essential amino acids and their interactions with the regulatory networks in plants, it should be possible to use genetic engineering to improve the essential amino acid content of horticultural plants, rendering these plants more nutritionally favorable crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Affy ID Fold Change P-Value Realtive Change Annotation Derivation
    Supplemental Table 2: Gene changes at 60 minutes in adherent versus non-adherent samples Affy_ID Fold change p-value Realtive_change Annotation Derivation of annotation A4052_s_at 4.313332633 0.024012538 Increase_in_Adherent trpE; anthranilate synthase component I (EC:4.1.3.27); K01657 anthranilate synthase component I [EC:4.1.3.27] ecw:EcE24377A_1463 V1799_s_at 3.972247924 0.033307448 Increase_in_Adherent hscB; co-chaperone HscB ; K04082 molecular chaperone HscB sdy:SDY_2723 V0231_s_at 3.95580421 0.000284517 Increase_in_Adherent ssb; single-stranded DNA-binding protein ; K03111 single-strand DNA-binding protein sdy:SDY_4508 SB5_0275_s_at 3.893614168 1.07E-05 Increase_in_Adherent hypothetical protein ; K02040 phosphate transport system substrate-binding protein sbo:SBO_3421 K3820_x_at 3.763692747 7.60E-05 Increase_in_Adherent putative holin protein eoj:ECO26_3693 O2ColV121_at 3.647435418 2.22E-05 Increase_in_Adherent NO_KEGG_DATA NO_KEGG_DATA SD1_2456_x_at 3.566304619 0.015156769 Increase_in_Adherent putative fructose-like phosphotransferase EIIB subunit 3 ; K11202 PTS system, fructose-specific IIB-like component [EC:2.7.1.69] sbc:SbBS512_E4440 SDY_4180_x_at 3.540687986 4.18E-05 Increase_in_Adherent NO_KEGG_DATA NO_KEGG_DATA D1328_s_at 3.533442346 0.004222188 Increase_in_Adherent NO_KEGG_DATA NO_KEGG_DATA A0552_s_at 3.51323466 0.019815913 Increase_in_Adherent hscB; co-chaperone HscB ; K04082 molecular chaperone HscB sdy:SDY_2723 b3350_s_at 3.455476842 0.000165312 Increase_in_Adherent NO_KEGG_DATA NO_KEGG_DATA V0624_x_at 3.388319399 0.000108353
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Table S1: Comparison of the Deleted Genes in the Genome-Reduced Strains
    Supplemental Table S1: Comparison of the deleted genes in the genome-reduced strains Legend 1 Locus tag according to the reference genome sequence of B. subtilis 168 (NC_000964) Genes highlighted in blue have been deleted from the respective strains Genes highlighted in green have been inserted into the indicated strain, they are present in all following strains Regions highlighted in red could not be deleted as a unit Regions highlighted in orange were not deleted in the genome-reduced strains since their deletion resulted in severe growth defects Gene BSU_number 1 Function ∆6 IIG-Bs27-47-24 PG10 PS38 dnaA BSU00010 replication initiation protein dnaN BSU00020 DNA polymerase III (beta subunit), beta clamp yaaA BSU00030 unknown recF BSU00040 repair, recombination remB BSU00050 involved in the activation of biofilm matrix biosynthetic operons gyrB BSU00060 DNA-Gyrase (subunit B) gyrA BSU00070 DNA-Gyrase (subunit A) rrnO-16S- trnO-Ala- trnO-Ile- rrnO-23S- rrnO-5S yaaC BSU00080 unknown guaB BSU00090 IMP dehydrogenase dacA BSU00100 penicillin-binding protein 5*, D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase pdxS BSU00110 pyridoxal-5'-phosphate synthase (synthase domain) pdxT BSU00120 pyridoxal-5'-phosphate synthase (glutaminase domain) serS BSU00130 seryl-tRNA-synthetase trnSL-Ser1 dck BSU00140 deoxyadenosin/deoxycytidine kinase dgk BSU00150 deoxyguanosine kinase yaaH BSU00160 general stress protein, survival of ethanol stress, SafA-dependent spore coat yaaI BSU00170 general stress protein, similar to isochorismatase yaaJ BSU00180 tRNA specific adenosine
    [Show full text]
  • Plastid-Localized Amino Acid Biosynthetic Pathways of Plantae Are Predominantly Composed of Non-Cyanobacterial Enzymes
    Plastid-localized amino acid biosynthetic pathways of Plantae are predominantly SUBJECT AREAS: MOLECULAR EVOLUTION composed of non-cyanobacterial PHYLOGENETICS PLANT EVOLUTION enzymes PHYLOGENY Adrian Reyes-Prieto1* & Ahmed Moustafa2* Received 1 26 September 2012 Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada, 2Department of Biology and Biotechnology Graduate Program, American University in Cairo, Egypt. Accepted 27 November 2012 Studies of photosynthetic eukaryotes have revealed that the evolution of plastids from cyanobacteria Published involved the recruitment of non-cyanobacterial proteins. Our phylogenetic survey of .100 Arabidopsis 11 December 2012 nuclear-encoded plastid enzymes involved in amino acid biosynthesis identified only 21 unambiguous cyanobacterial-derived proteins. Some of the several non-cyanobacterial plastid enzymes have a shared phylogenetic origin in the three Plantae lineages. We hypothesize that during the evolution of plastids some enzymes encoded in the host nuclear genome were mistargeted into the plastid. Then, the activity of those Correspondence and foreign enzymes was sustained by both the plastid metabolites and interactions with the native requests for materials cyanobacterial enzymes. Some of the novel enzymatic activities were favored by selective compartmentation should be addressed to of additional complementary enzymes. The mosaic phylogenetic composition of the plastid amino acid A.R.-P. ([email protected]) biosynthetic pathways and the reduced number of plastid-encoded proteins of non-cyanobacterial origin suggest that enzyme recruitment underlies the recompartmentation of metabolic routes during the evolution of plastids. * Equal contribution made by these authors. rimary plastids of plants and algae are the evolutionary outcome of an endosymbiotic association between eukaryotes and cyanobacteria1.
    [Show full text]