Historic Myths Inspire Today's Messianic Nationalism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historic Myths Inspire Today's Messianic Nationalism Historic Myths Inspire Today’s Messianic Nationalism Yehoshafat Harkabi’s most important book for the contemporary period is his 1988-89 work Israel’s Fateful Hour, which was published in Hebrew two years before and is largely a reworking of his 1982 book The Bar Kochba Syndrome. Shimon Bar Kochba was the leader of an unsuccessful revolt in Eretz Israel—mostly in Judea—against the Romans from 132 to 135 CE. Because the revolt lacked its own chronicler comparable to Josephus, the chronicler of the Jewish Revolt of 66 to 73 CE who had begun as one of its leaders before switching sides to save his life, few firm facts about it are known. Harkabi did research using the rabbinical lore about Bar Kochba, known to his opponents as Bar Kosiba—son of a lie—rather than Bar Kochba—son of a star. He then used what little the Romans wrote about the revolt and the archaeological record from the excavations of Yigael Yadin in the 1960s and others to piece together an account. Harkabi indicts Bar Kochba for an abject lack of realism in planning and carrying out a revolt that had no real hope of ultimate success, and that resulted in the destruction of many of the Jewish villages in Eretz Israel, the banning of Jews from Jerusalem, and the start of the mass exodus of Jews from Eretz Israel to the diaspora. Harkabi clearly sides with the rabbis regarding the legacy of Bar Kochba. Why is this important? Zionist ideology in the prestate and early state eras mythologizied historical figures from the Second Temple period, from the Hasmonean Maccabees to Bar Kochba. This is because the Maccabees restored Jewish sovereignty over Eretz Israel by defeating their Greek colonial masters, and even the two great revolts against the Romans triumphed briefly, before being crushed. Masada became the great pilgrimage site of Labor Zionism and was then adopted by the IDF as the place for swearing in graduating recruits of elite units. Bar Kochba was the partial inspiration of the Revisionist youth movement Betar, founded in Riga, Latvia in 1923. Betar was the name of the last Jewish stronghold to fall to the Romans in 135, and was also used as an acronym by the Revisionists for Brit Trumpeldor, the Alliance of Trumpeldor. Yosef Trumpeldor was the Jewish veteran of the Rusian Tsarist army, who lost an arm in the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-05. He then immigrated to Palestine and during World War I helped to recruit the Zion Mule Corps in 1915 that fought at Gallipoli and served as the core of the Jewish Legion that helped to conquer Palestine in 1918. Trumpeldor fell defending Tel Hai, near today’s Kiryat Shemonah, against Arab attackers in 1920. Both the Labor Zionists and the Revisionists turned him into Zionism’s first martyr. Writing in the 1980s during the era of Menahem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, the first period of Likud rule, Harkabi saw a tendency for a romantic politics of gestures, no matter what the likely and actual results. Several of Begin’s biographers have noted the influence of Polish nationalist romanticism on Begin. And Shamir, one of the three leaders of the 1940s Lehi underground, carefully cherished the memory of Yair—Avraham Stern—who died from British bullets in a Tel Aviv apartment in February 1942. Stern had instigated a revolt that had little hope for success, and was incongruously launched even while the British were fighting the Nazis in North Africa. Under the influence of Begin, the Likud transformed the memory of the Irgun and Lehi undergrounds into a mythology comparable to that of the Masada cult. Today, some three decades after Harkabi first wrote about Bar Kochba, we have the reality of Netanyahu continuing to settle the West Bank in defiance of Obama and most of the world. We have Netanyahu intervening in the politics of Israel’s only reliable great power ally at a time when he claims that Israel’s existence is on the line. And we have the phenomenon of the Hilltop Youth, the alienated offspring of the settlement movement and of ultra- Orthodox communities, who engage in settlement activity, even in defiance of the state. The Labor Zionist haShomer (civil guard) gave inspiration to Betar, which then delivered the Revisionist undergrounds of 1937-48. These then gave rise to the Likud in the 1970s and 1980s and allowed them to colonize the West Bank. The West Bank settlers have now given rise to the Kahanist Hilltop Youth—messianic nationalist anarchists. So in approximately the same amount of time that it took the memory of the Great Jewish Revolt to produce the ensuing Bar Kochba Revolt, the Zionist movement has gone from protecting isolated Jewish settlements to Jewish settlers defying the Jewish state on the West Bank, and carrying out terror attacks against Arabs in revenge for state action. Harkabi died in 1994 just as the Oslo process was getting underway. His most important legacy is not his analysis of Arab attitudes towards Israel published in the mid-1970s but his analyses of Israeli politics published in 1977 and during the 1980s..
Recommended publications
  • Policy Strategies of Accommodation Or Domination in Jerusalem: an Historical Perspective Ira D
    Document generated on 09/25/2021 1:08 p.m. Journal of Conflict Studies Policy Strategies of Accommodation or Domination in Jerusalem: An Historical Perspective Ira D. Sharkansky Volume 15, Number 1, Spring 1995 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/jcs15_01art05 See table of contents Publisher(s) The University of New Brunswick ISSN 1198-8614 (print) 1715-5673 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Sharkansky, I. D. (1995). Policy Strategies of Accommodation or Domination in Jerusalem:: An Historical Perspective. Journal of Conflict Studies, 15(1), 74–91. All rights reserved © Centre for Conflict Studies, UNB, 1995 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Policy Strategies of Accommodation or Domination in Jerusalem: An Historical Perspective by Ira Sharkansky Ira Sharkansky is Professor of Political Science and Public Administration at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. With an age of some 4.000 years, Jerusalem is one of the world's oldest cities. Although there have been numerous changes in regime, prominent issues confronting the present city resemble those of times past, and certain continuities can be found in the policy strategies pursued by those who have governed Jerusalem. This article compares the strategy of the present regime with those apparent in previous periods from the sixth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table
    The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table Dan Zafrir THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS Every academic year ICSR is offering six young leaders from Israel and Palestine the opportunity to come to London for a period of two months in order to develop their ideas on how to further mutual understanding in their region through addressing both themselves and “the other”, as well as engaging in research, debate and constructive dialogue in a neutral academic environment. The end result is a short paper that will provide a deeper understanding and a new perspective on a specific topic or event that is personal to each Fellow. Author: Dan Zafrir, 2017 Through the Looking Glass Fellow, ICSR. The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not reflect those of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation. Editor: Katie Rothman, ICSR CONTACT DETAILS Like all other ICSR publications, this report can be downloaded free of charge from the ICSR website at www.icsr.info. For questions, queries and additional copies of the report, please contact: ICSR King’s College London Strand London WC2R 2LS United Kingdom T. +44 (0)20 7848 2065 E. [email protected] For news and updates, follow ICSR on Twitter: @ICSR_Centre. © ICSR 2017 The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table Contents Introduction 3 Empathy Starts with the Self 4 The Opening of the Israeli Mind… 5 … And the Closing of the Palestinian One 7 Empathizing with the Past to Establish a Future (i.e.: Policy Recommendations) 8 Conclusion 9 Reference List 10 1 The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table 2 The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table Introduction mpathy is often regarded as a key feature of social life.
    [Show full text]
  • Eytan 20 Jun 1990 Transcript
    United Nations Oral History Project Walter Eytan 20 June 1990 r _. • ,<; .. iJ (()~ ~ NO~J-CIRCULATI NG ) YUN INTERVIEW lJ'" llBRf\R'LlBR;.\ t"!' . F( i Gr ~­~- . ·'·'::::··,':;·'WALTER·'·'::::··.':;·'WALTER EYTAN ~ ~lr.J\~lr.J\!! : -~-'~, "' .... JUNE 20, 1990"1990 .. ,'U"'~~U'"'t''''1''1'l '.,J:'-C)LL'[ I ~ ......."",1"':Ll J "'co""""',,",,,,,, _ NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK INTERVIEWER, JEAN KRASNO TABLE OF CONTENTCONTENTSS FOUNDING OF THE STATE OF ISRAEISRAELL positions Held by Mr. Eytan • . 1,2,4 The Jewish Agency ••• • . ... 2-5,7,10,11 The New York Delegation ... 4,5 statehood and Partition •••. • . ...... 6-9 UN Special Committee on Palestine .... 6-8,12,28 General Assembly ••••••.•....•... • • • • . • . • . .7,8,11 Jerusalem •••••• .- ••.....•.... 8-12,26,28,40 The Fighting •••• • • . ...11,12,24,29,39,40 The British Role . .13,18,19,21 Declaring Independence .15-18 The Palestine Committee . ... ... 19-21 The Truce •• . ... 22-24 UN Mediation •••••• • • • • . .25,26,27 Armistice Negotiations at Rhodes . .27-41 UN Conciliation Commission ...35,44,45 Mixed Armistice Commission • .39,41 UNTSO . ... •••••••......... • • • • . 42 1 JK: For the record, Mr. Eytan, could you please explain thethe role that you played during the time around thethe establishment of the state of Israel approximately between the years of 1947 and 1949? When did your involvement with Palestine begin? EytanEytan:: My involvement with Palestine began much earlier, inin 1933. But in 1933 there was no UN and all thesethese questions that you are raising don't really apply. In 1947 I was in Jerusalem. I was a member of the political department of the Jewish Agency for Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Mowing the Grass': Israel'sstrategy for Protracted Intractable Conflict
    This article was downloaded by: [Bar-Ilan University] On: 27 February 2014, At: 05:21 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Strategic Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fjss20 ‘Mowing the Grass’: Israel’s Strategy for Protracted Intractable Conflict Efraim Inbara & Eitan Shamira a Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, Bar-Ilan University, Israel Published online: 10 Oct 2013. To cite this article: Efraim Inbar & Eitan Shamir (2014) ‘Mowing the Grass’: Israel’s Strategy for Protracted Intractable Conflict, Journal of Strategic Studies, 37:1, 65-90, DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2013.830972 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2013.830972 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • The IDF in the Second Intifada
    Volume 13 | No. 3 | October 2010 A Decade since the Outbreak of the al-Aqsa Intifada: A Strategic Overview | Michael Milstein The IDF in the Second Intifada | Giora Eiland The Rise and Fall of Suicide Bombings in the Second Intifada | Yoram Schweitzer The Political Process in the Entangled Gordian Knot | Anat Kurz The End of the Second Intifada? | Jonathan Schachter The Second Intifada and Israeli Public Opinion | Yehuda Ben Meir and Olena Bagno-Moldavsky The Disengagement Plan: Vision and Reality | Zaki Shalom Israel’s Coping with the al-Aqsa Intifada: A Critical Review | Ephraim Lavie 2000-2010: An Influential Decade |Oded Eran Resuming the Multilateral Track in a Comprehensive Peace Process | Shlomo Brom and Jeffrey Christiansen The Core Issues of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: The Fifth Element | Shiri Tal-Landman המכון למחקרי ביטחון לאומי THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURcITY STUDIES INCORPORATING THE JAFFEE bd CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES Strategic ASSESSMENT Volume 13 | No. 3 | October 2010 CONteNts Abstracts | 3 A Decade since the Outbreak of the al-Aqsa Intifada: A Strategic Overview | 7 Michael Milstein The IDF in the Second Intifada | 27 Giora Eiland The Rise and Fall of Suicide Bombings in the Second Intifada | 39 Yoram Schweitzer The Political Process in the Entangled Gordian Knot | 49 Anat Kurz The End of the Second Intifada? | 63 Jonathan Schachter The Second Intifada and Israeli Public Opinion | 71 Yehuda Ben Meir and Olena Bagno-Moldavsky The Disengagement Plan: Vision and Reality | 85 Zaki Shalom Israel’s Coping with the al-Aqsa Intifada: A Critical Review | 101 Ephraim Lavie 2000-2010: An Influential Decade | 123 Oded Eran Resuming the Multilateral Track in a Comprehensive Peace Process | 133 Shlomo Brom and Jeffrey Christiansen The Core Issues of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: The Fifth Element | 141 Shiri Tal-Landman The purpose of Strategic Assessment is to stimulate and Strategic enrich the public debate on issues that are, or should be, ASSESSMENT on Israel’s national security agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Lost Opportunities for Peace in the Arab- Israeli Conºict
    Lost Opportunities for Jerome Slater Peace in the Arab- Israeli Conºict Israel and Syria, 1948–2001 Until the year 2000, during which both the Israeli-Palestinian and Israeli-Syrian negotiating pro- cesses collapsed, it appeared that the overall Arab-Israeli conºict was ªnally going to be settled, thus bringing to a peaceful resolution one of the most en- during and dangerous regional conºicts in recent history.The Israeli-Egyptian conºict had concluded with the signing of the 1979 Camp David peace treaty, the Israeli-Jordanian conºict had formally ended in 1994 (though there had been a de facto peace between those two countries since the end of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war), and both the Israeli-Palestinian and Israeli-Syrian conºicts seemedLost Opportunities for Peace on the verge of settlement. Yet by the end of 2000, both sets of negotiations had collapsed, leading to the second Palestinian intifada (uprising), the election of Ariel Sharon as Israel’s prime minister in February 2001, and mounting Israeli-Palestinian violence in 2001 and 2002.What went wrong? Much attention has been focused on the lost 1 opportunity for an Israeli-Palestinian settlement, but surprisingly little atten- tion has been paid to the collapse of the Israeli-Syrian peace process.In fact, the Israeli-Syrian negotiations came much closer to producing a comprehen- Jerome Slater is University Research Scholar at the State University of New York at Buffalo.Since serving as a Fulbright scholar in Israel in 1989, he has written widely on the Arab-Israeli conºict for professional journals such as the Jerusalem Journal of International Relations and Political Science Quarterly.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace, Peace, When There Is No Peace (Israel and the Arabs 1948–1961)
    Peace, Peace, When There Is No Peace (Israel and the Arabs 1948–1961) N. Israeli (Akiva Orr and Moshé Machover) Translated from Hebrew by Mark Marshall ii Introduction [to the first edition]................................................................................... xv Chapter 1: “Following Clayton’s Participation in the League’s Meetings”................ 1 Chapter 2: Borders and Refugees ................................................................................. 28 Map: How the Palestinian state was divided............................................................ 42 Chapter 3: Israel and the Powers (1948-1955)............................................................. 83 Chapter 4: Israel and Changes in the Arab World ................................................... 141 Chapter 5: Reprisal Actions......................................................................................... 166 Chapter 6: “The Third Kingdom of Israel” (29/11/56 – 7/3/57).............................. 225 Chapter 7: Sinai War: Post-Mortem........................................................................... 303 Chapter 8: After Suez................................................................................................... 394 Chapter 9: How is the Problem to be Solved?............................................................ 420 Appendices (1999) ......................................................................................................... 498 Appendix 1: Haaretz article on the 30th anniversary of “Operation Qadesh”
    [Show full text]
  • Time for Reorientation: a Review of Recent Research on the Arab-Israeli Conflict
    Discussions and Reviews Time for reorientation: a review of recent research on the Arab-Israeli conflict Ania Francos, Les Palestiniens Paris: Julliard, 1968. Pp. 318. Fr. 20.70. Yehoshafat Harkabi, Fedayeen Action and Arab Strategy London: Institute for Strategic Studies (Adelphi Paper No. 53), 1969. Pp. 43. 5s (75&cent;). To Make War or Make Peace (New Outlook Symposium) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Inevitable War or Initiatives for Peace. Tel-Aviv: New Outlook, 1969. Pp. 288. I.L. 8.00 ($2.50). Hisham Sharabi, Palestine and Israel: The Lethal Dilemma New York: Pegasus, 1969. Pp. 224. $6.95. Nadav Safran, From War to War: The Arab-Israeli Confrontation, 1948-1967 New York: Pegasus, 1969. Pp. 464. $10.00. JOSEPH D. BEN-DAK Center for Research on Conflict Resolution. Universitv of Michigan Voltaire’s somewhat facetious criticism of extension of traditional work on the Middle certain Biblical texts, &dquo;dans un livre saint un East. Orientalists, staunch adherents of the peu d’exactitude ne nuirait pas,&dquo; can be ap- historical-philological approach, wrote dic- plied to current writings on the Arab-Israeli tionaries and grammars alike, &dquo;through a conflict. A good amount of the work is an very considerable amount of additions and ~ ~ z translations of texts, to histories of wider or 1The author wishes to acknowledge his indebted- narrower scope&dquo; (van Nieuwenhuijze, 1965, ness to Ziva Reuveni and Rosalind without Daly, p. 1). The taste of a wider public was served whose this review would have been help impos- which into sible. Daniel Heradstveit and Johan Galtung (Oslo) by travelogues gradually expanded have been instrumental in suggesting the type of general descriptions of regions or countries: approach argued for in this review.
    [Show full text]
  • Discord Behind the Table: the Internal Conflict Among Israeli Jews Concerning the Future of Settlements in the West Bank and Gaza
    Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2005 Issue 1 Article 5 2005 Discord behind the Table: The Internal Conflict among Israeli Jews concerning the Future of Settlements in the West Bank and Gaza Robert H. Mnookin Ehud Eiran Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Robert H. Mnookin and Ehud Eiran, Discord behind the Table: The Internal Conflict among Israeli Jews concerning the Future of Settlements in the West Bank and Gaza, 2005 J. Disp. Resol. (2005) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2005/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Dispute Resolution by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mnookin and Eiran: Mnookin: Discord behind the Table Discord "Behind the Table": The Internal Conflict Among Israeli Jews Concerning the Future of Settlements in the West Bank and Gaza Robert H. Mnookin* & Ehud Eiran** I. INTRODUCTION The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is deeply paradoxical: the basic outline of a deal that might better serve the interests of most Israelis and most Palestinians is reasonably clear and yet this violent conflict persists. Since the Camp David ne- gotiations orchestrated by President Bill Clinton collapsed in the summer of 2000, the entire Oslo peace process has disintegrated and in the following four years more than 1000 Israelis and 3000 Palestinians have died in renewed violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of the Israel-Arab Conflict
    17.42 / Causes and Prevention of War Stephen Van Evera CAUSES OF THE ISRAEL-ARAB CONFLICT I. ISRAEL/PALESTINE IN ANCIENT TIMES The territory west of the Jordan River--today's Israel/Palestine--was called Canaan before 1200 B.C.E. It was inhabited by Canaanites, a semitic people culturally like the Israelites of that age, for most of the third millennium B.C.E. and the first half of the second millennium B.C.E. Israelites (forbearers of today's Jews) and Philistines appeared in Canaan at about the same time, in the 12th century B.C.E. The Israelites traced their origins to Abraham of Ur of Chaldea (circa 1900 B.C.E.). Some historians today instead think that the Israelites formed from a community of escaped Canaanite slaves. They settled the highlands of Canaan, which is today's West Bank area. The Philistines settled its coastal plains, which are Israeli territory today. After two centuries the Jews subjugated the Philistines, Canaanites, and others. They created a Jewish kingdom in around 1000 B.C.E.1 This Israelite kingdom split into northern and southern kingdoms in 927 B.C.E. The northern kingdom was destroyed by Assyria in 722 B.C.E., the southern was conquered by Babylon in 528 B.C.E. The Jews of the region regained independence during 140-63 B.C.E. but were then annexed by Rome, which then ruled the Jews with great cruelty. This left the Jews stateless until 1948 C.E. The Jews rebelled disastrously against Roman rule in 66-73 C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinian Society in the Wake of the 1948 Catastrophe [Al-Nakba]
    Moshe Shemesh Th e Palestinian Society in the Wake of the 1948 War: From Social Fragmentation to Consolidation The repercussions of the 1948 War between the Arab states and Israel created deep social, demographic, and political crises within Pales- tinian society: two major products of the war were the refugee problem and the Arab-Israeli confl ict. Moreover, the Palestinians were left without responsible leadership that both the Palestinians and the Arab states could accept as representative. “Palestine,” or “Filastin” as a geo-political entity vanished from the map of the Middle East. Th e Eastern part of Palestine, which was occupied by the Arab Legion, was formally annexed to Trans- Jordan in April 1950 and called the West Bank of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Th e other part of Palestine, which was occupied by Egypt, was not annexed to Egypt, but was called the Gaza Strip or offi cially “the Pal- estinian land under the control of the Egyptian Army.” At the Arab League Council in March 1959, Egypt initiated the notion of the revival of the Palestinian entity. In September 1963, the Arab League Council nominated Ahmad al-Shuqayri as Filastin representative at the Council instead of Ahmad Hilmi, who had died in June of that year. It was only in January 1964, however, that the fi rst Arab summit’s decisions on the Palestinian entity paved the way for Ahmad al-Shuqayri to establish the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) in June 1964. Th e PLO was designed to represent the Palestinians and symbolize their political- national issue rather than the Palestinian refugee problem.¹ Th e year 1959 witnessed three important Palestinian phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Strategies of Accommodation Or Domination in Jerusalem: an Historical Perspective Ira D
    Document généré le 27 sept. 2021 23:57 Journal of Conflict Studies Policy Strategies of Accommodation or Domination in Jerusalem: An Historical Perspective Ira D. Sharkansky Volume 15, numéro 1, spring 1995 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/jcs15_01art05 Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) The University of New Brunswick ISSN 1198-8614 (imprimé) 1715-5673 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Sharkansky, I. D. (1995). Policy Strategies of Accommodation or Domination in Jerusalem:: An Historical Perspective. Journal of Conflict Studies, 15(1), 74–91. All rights reserved © Centre for Conflict Studies, UNB, 1995 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ Policy Strategies of Accommodation or Domination in Jerusalem: An Historical Perspective by Ira Sharkansky Ira Sharkansky is Professor of Political Science and Public Administration at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. With an age of some 4.000 years, Jerusalem is one of the world's oldest cities. Although there have been numerous changes in regime, prominent issues confronting the present city resemble those of times past, and certain continuities can be found in the policy strategies pursued by those who have governed Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]