DOCSLIB.ORG

Tindak Lanjut One Belt One Road (Obor) Summit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tindak Lanjut One Belt One Road (Obor) Summit Version August 21, 2017 REPUBLIK INDONESIA PARTNERING WITH PRIVATE SECTOR THROUGH PPP IN INDONESIA Novie Andriani Acting as Deputy Director of Financial Engineering II Directorate of PPP and Financial Engineering Ministry of National Development Planning / National Development Planning Agency Republic of Indonesia INVESTMENT REQUIRED IN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT (2015 -2019) 2 Increasing the significant role of SOE & Private Sector Investment Value (The Sources) Sources Descriptions • Government Spending • Government’s infrastructure budget 2015-2017: • Non-Government 2015: USD 21.7 Bn State Budget: Spending (subsidy, PSO2) 2016: USD 23.5 Bn USD 148.2 Bn • Local Government 2017: USD 25.9 Bn Spending • Therefore, total 2015-2019: ± USD 112.3 Bn (< USD 148.2 Bn), Total Value of (41,3%) • Funding (PMN3 and Investment viability gap fund) require more funding support from private sector Required in Infrastructure1 SOE : 2015-2019: USD 79.8 Bn • State-Owned Enterprise • Proportion of infrastructure investment using PPP scheme in 58.7% GAP to (22,2%) (SOE) be funded by other countries (on average) is 22% USD 359.2 Bn • Private Sector Non- (UK, Thailand, Portugal, and Brazil (IDR 4,796.2 Tn) • Public Private Government Private the highest >40%) Participation: Partnership (PPP) with Budget Guarantee Fund USD 131.1 Bn (36,5%) 1 : Calculation based on infrastructure investment (required) to be a middle income country by 2025. Source: Bappenas- JICA, 2014: Background Study for RPJMN 2015-2019, Analyst team of Kementerian PPN/Bappenas 2 : Public Service Obligation 3 : Government Equity Version August 21, 2017 Why Should You Invest in Indonesia? REPUBLIK INDONESIA th Largest th 16 4 Most populous economy in Indonesia is a big market, country in the the world… world and the … Top 5 Emerging markets ±5% Private with the best consumption middle class grows steadily potential GDP per capita (USD) Indonesian Economic 3,6 Indonesia’s economic growth is Growth (%) 05 5,2 3,3 relatively high and stable with 5,0 5,0 4,9 74 improving GDP per capita 2014 2015 2016 2017* 2015 2016 Source: BPS *Outlook Infrastructure Development is Indonesia is projected to be the progressive 4th largest Economy in the World in 2050 (World in 2050, PwC) 3 Version August 21, 2017 Investment Facts of Indonesia REPUBLIK INDONESIA Indonesia obtains investment grade from rating agencies Baa3 / Positive BBB- / Stable BBB- / Positive BBB- / Positive BBB- / Positive Top Japanese investment Top Destination for destination attracting investors in 3 (JBIC Ratings) 3 Asia (The Economist) Rank Jumped from rank 109 in 2015 for Ease of Doing Business 91 ( EoDB, World Bank) of investment realization in Indonesia are FDI capital Abundant natural 65% resources 4 Version August 21, 2017 Public-Private Partnership Regulations in Infrastructure Provision REPUBLIK INDONESIA Subject matter of Presidential Regulation Number 38/2015 Aspects Regulation Presidential Regulation Number 38/2015 Subject of Government Business Entity partnership 1. Minister 1. SOE/ROE Ministry of National Development Planning Regulation 2. Head of Institution 2. Foreign Business Entity Number 4/2015 regarding General Guidelines 3. Head of Region 3. Limited Liability 4. SOE/ROE Company Head of Government Procurement of Goods and Services 4. Cooperation Agency Regulation Number 19/2015 regarding Provision by Business Entity Object of Economic and Social Infrastructures (19 sectors of Partnership infrastructure) AVAILABILITY PAYMENT; Government 1. Government in kind Contribution 2. Government support {i.e. Viability Gap Fund) Minister of Finance Regulation Number 3. Government guarantee 260 /PMK.08/2016 Investment 1. User charge (payment by user in the form of tariff) Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Return for 2. Availability payment (payment of service availability) Number 96/2016 Business Entity 3. Other forms as long as it doesn’t contravene with the law GOVERNMENT GUARANTEE • Presidential Regulation Number 78/2010 • Minister of Finance Regulation Number 260/PMK.011/2010 jo. Minister of Phases 1. Planning phase Finance Regulation Number 8/PMK.08/2016 2. Preparation phase 3. Transaction phase GOVERNMENT SUPPORT Minister of Finance Regulation Number 223/PMK.11/2012 (VGF) 5 Version August 21, 2017 19 Sectors of PPP Infrastructure REPUBLIK INDONESIA Sports, art and Water Resources Centralized Local Waste Road Water Supply culture Facility Transportation and Irrigation Waste Water Water Telecommunica Waste Zone Energy Oil and Gas Urban Facility electricity tion and Management Conservation informatics System Correctional Education Tourism Housing Health Facility 6 PPP Scheme in Indonesia Version August 21, 2017 Indonesia’s Government has successfully implemented 6 schemes as benchmarks for future REPUBLIK INDONESIA PPP projects PPP Projects Based On Structure Development 1 PPP with Only Government Guarantee • Coal fired Power Plant Central Java 2x 1000 MW (investment US$ 3,900.0 million) 2 PPP with Tariff and Viability Gap Fund (VGF) • Umbulan Drinking-Water Facility (investment US$ 157.8 million) 3 PPP with Availability Payment (AP) for Investment Return • Palapa Ring Optic-Fiber Network (investment US$ 583.4 million) 4 PPP with Government in-Kind (Construction Support) Toll Road Solo – Kertosono (US$ 578.8 million) Toll Road Cisumdawu (US$ 1,050.0 million) Total: US$ 3,402.9 million Toll Road Balikpapan – Samarinda (US$ 1,120.0 million) Toll Road Manado – Bitung (US$ 654.1 million) PPP Projects Based On Project Preparation 1 PPP with Success Fee Scheme Coal fired Power Plant Central Java 2x 1000 MW (investment US$ 3,900.0 million) 2 Unsolicited PPP Project Toll Road Jakarta – Cikampek II Elevated (investment US$ 1,050.0 million) 7 PPP Stages (1) Version August 21, 2017 REPUBLIK INDONESIA Solicited Project CONSTRUCTION PLANNING PREPARATION TRANSACTION & OPERATION Project Preliminary PPP Agreement Outline Business Case Final Business Case Prequalification Request for Bid Award Financial Close identification study (OBC) (FBC) Proposal Signing 1 – 3 YEARS Private sector involvement : Private sector involvement: Private sector involvement: • Project preparation and transaction advisory through • transaction advisory through success fee mechanism • Debt Financier success fee mechanism • Investor/bidder • Project initiator under unsolicited scheme • Lender/ project sponsor Example: PPP OFFICE Palapa Ring Broad band internet, toll road, water GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA supply: 1 years CAPITAL PLACE, 8TH FLOOR KANTOR BERSAMA KPBU REPUBLIK INDONESIA JALAN JENDERAL GATOT SUBROTO KAV. 18 JAKARTA SELATAN 12710-INDONESIA PHONE: +62 21 27081111 www.pppoffice-indonesia.or.id 8 PPP Stages (2) Version August 21, 2017 REPUBLIK INDONESIA Unsolicited Project Project proponent submitting a Business Entity proposal and pre-feasibility PPP submit FS Procurement study (FS) document to GCA FS evaluation Agreement Signing • Pre-FS document evaluation to Issuing approval letter: get pre-FS approval 1. Establishing the project as an • GCA gives rights to project Unsolicited Project proponent to prepare feasibility 2. Establishing the business entity study (FS). as the project initiator 3. The approved type of compensation: CRITERIA OF EVALUATION: •Technically integrated with the sectoral master plan •Economically and financially feasible Compensation option to the •The business entity that proposes the project initiator initiative has adequate financial capability to finance the project Example: Additional mark of 10% on The GCA purchase Right to match Jakarta – Cikampek Elevated Toll Road the procurement score the PPP initiative Version August 21, 2017 Project Pipeline REPUBLIK INDONESIA CONSTRUCTION PLANNING PREPARATION TRANSACTION & OPERATION Project Preliminary Tender PPP Agreement Outline Business Case Final Business Case PQ Request for Bid Award Financial Close identification study (OBC) (FBC) Preparation Proposal Signing 1. Railway 1. Yogya Solo Toll Road TPPAS Nambo 1. Central Java Power 1. Surabaya Madura Semarang – 1. Serang 1. SPAM Plant 2. Yogya Bawen Toll Makassar- Toll Road Demak Toll Panimbang Bandar 2. Palapa Ring Road Parepare 2. Hang Nadim Road toll road Lampung 3. Umbulan Water 3. Bitung Port 2. Surabaya Airport 2. Jakarta- 2. Probowangi Cisumdawu Supply Rapid Mass 4. Patimbang port 3. Medan LRT and Toll Road 4. Manado Bitung Toll Section II Cikampek Toll Road Transport BRT Road 5. West Semarang south toll 5. Balikpapan- 3. Makassar LRT 4. Pekanbaru Water Supply Regional Water road Samarinda Tollroad 4. Labuan Bajo 6. Pirngadi Hospital Supply 6. Pandaan-Malang Tollroad Airport 7. Sidoarjo General 5. Pondok Gede Hospital 7. Kerian-Legundi- water Supply Bunder-Manyar 8. Teaching Hospital at 6. Legok Nangka Tollroad University of Udayana Waste Treatment 8. Jakarta-Cikampek 9. Education Facility 7. Street Lighting elevated II Toll Development of Bandung Road Politechnic Batam 8. Teaching Hospital 9. Batang-Semarang 10.Industrial Prison University of Toll Road Nusakambangan Samratulangi 10. Serpong-Balaraja 11.Sports Arena Papua TollRoad Ready for Under Preparation: US$ 2.8 Billion Already tendered (but still available for Already Tendered Transaction: financing): US$ 4.0 Billion (Under Construction): US$ 0.1 Billion US$ 8.7Billion 10 Version August 21, 2017 PPP Project Pipeline (2) REPUBLIK INDONESIA Under preparation (US$ 2,782.2 million) Project Identification (US$ 806.9 million) 1. Railway Makassar- Parepare (US$ 518.0 million) FBC (US$ 1,272.8 million ) 2. Surabaya Rapid Mass Transport (under calculation) 3. Makassar
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Determination of Distribution Center Location in Xyz Small and Medium Enterprise (Sme) Using Center of Gravity Method
    Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation; 32(2) ISSN 2651-4451 | e-ISSN 2651-446X DETERMINATION OF DISTRIBUTION CENTER LOCATION IN XYZ SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE (SME) USING CENTER OF GRAVITY METHOD Riki Ridwan Margana1,Yoga R. Nurazis2, M. Roziqulloh Prima A3, Fitri Wineka4, Tami Mariza5 1,2,3,4,5 Widyatama University, Bandung, Indonesia 1Corresponding Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT XYZ Small Medium Enterprise (SME)is anSMEthat produces hijab. Research activities on XYZ aims to determine the operational cost of XYZ, caused by the far distance between the production site with retails. The analytical method which we use is by using the Center of Gravity. From the results of using the Center of Gravity method, the location of the new warehouse can be determined with the coordinates X = -7.51, Y = 110.45, which is located in Dusun II, Lencoh, Selo, Boyolali Regency, Central Java,XYZ can save distribution operational cost fromIDR 22,711,150 toIDR 12,712,400.Therefore, XYZ can save distribution operational costs of IDR 9,998,750or with a percentage of 55.97%.With the new distribution center location, it will shorten the distance from 1446 km to 264.6 km and reduce the transportation cost from the production site in Cicalengka, Bandung to the distribution center located in Dusun II, Lencoh, Selo, Boyolali Regency, Central Java. Keywords: Distribution Center, Center of Gravity, Distribution, Small Medium Enterprise I. INTRODUCTION Logistics is about planning and controlling the flow of material and information in an organization in both public and private sectors (Ghiani, Laporte, & Musmanno, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Morning Brief
    Morning Brief JCI Movement Daily | 07 Sept, 2021 JCI Index Sept 06 6,126.93 Chg. +0.01pts (+0.00%) Volume (bn shares) 180.89 Value (IDR tn) 9.92 Adv. 252 Dec. 231 Unc. 245 Untr. 88 Today’s Outlook: Most Active Stocks (IDR bn) by Value Global stock markets tended to strengthen at the beginning of the week (06/09), Stocks Val. Stocks Val. marked by an increase in the MSCI All-Country World index by 0.3%. Investors BBRI 665.6 BBCA 242.0 seem to respond to the possibility of survival of the low interest rates era in the PGAS 425.8 CARE 222.8 US. Meanwhile, the price of aluminium reached its highest price in 10 years, TBIG 312.0 WIKA 209.3 following supply concerns after the coup in Guinea. ARTO 292.1 TLKM 178.5 BABP 289.7 NATO 163.5 Domestically, the JCI started the week sideways ahead of PPKM extension until September 13, 2021. Bank Indonesia will release the position of Foreign Foreign Transaction (IDR bn) Exchange Reserves for the August period which has the opportunity to increase Buy 1,946 to USD 139 billion. The JCI's movement today may potentially strengthen with a Sell 1,584 projected range of 6,100 - 6,169. Net Buy (Sell) 361 Company News Top Buy NB Val. Top Sell NS Val. BBCA 79.6 TOWR 42.2 WSKT : Targets Divestment of 6-7 Toll Roads This Year TLKM 79.0 ARTO 36.9 PTBA : Aims for 30 Million tons of Coal Production in 2021 BUKA 52.1 UNVR 17.7 ENRG : Obtains Assets in the Upstream Oil and Gas Sector BABP 43.6 FREN 16.4 Domestic & Global News TBIG 38.2 KLBF 15.0 Jokowi Releases PPh Rules for Transfer of Oil and Gas Contractors Obligations Government Bond Yields & FX German Factory Orders Boosted by Foreign Demand for Ships Last Chg.
    [Show full text]
  • Coming to Financial Close in Ppps
    PWMXXX10.1177/1087724X20914627Public Works Management & PolicyEndo et al. 914627research-article2020 Research & Theory Public Works Management & Policy 1 –29 Coming to Financial Close © The Author(s) 2020 Article reuse guidelines: in PPPs: Identifying Critical sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X20914627DOI: 10.1177/1087724X20914627 Factors in the Case of Toll journals.sagepub.com/home/pwm Road Projects in Indonesia Kei Endo1,2 , Alberto Gianoli2, and Jurian Edelenbos2 Abstract In Indonesia, public–private partnerships (PPPs) schemes have been attracting a lot of attention to meet the huge demand for infrastructure developments. However, their applications are still limited and the financial close of a project tends to be behind the planned schedule. This research therefore aims to investigate the critical success factors (CSFs) causing fast/slow progress in the processes toward the financial close of PPPs toll road projects in Indonesia. The results revealed that, to realize smoother delivery of PPPs toll road projects in Indonesia to the financial close in the future, it is important to improve coordination among the related stakeholders especially between the central and local governments, though the other CSFs are currently well developed. The research also found an issue that should be addressed from a sustainability viewpoint, namely that the government highly depends on state-owned companies (SOEs) for a timely financial close of PPPs toll road projects. Keywords public–private partnerships, critical success factors, financial close, toll roads, Indonesia Introduction Public–private partnerships (PPPs) have gained a lot of popularity in realizing infra- structure projects across the world since the private finance initiative (PFI) was pro- posed by John Major’s Conservative government in 1992 (Hodge et al., 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Key Improvements in Infrastructure Delivery in Indonesia
    Key Improvements in Infrastructure Delivery in Indonesia Joseph Tobing, Director of Finance Committee for Acceleration of Priority Infrastructure Delivery August 2017 Agenda KPPIP, National Strategic Projects (PSN) and Priority Projects Issues and Challenges Latest Policy Development 2 Agenda KPPIP, National Strategic Projects (PSN) and Priority Projects Issues and Challenges Latest Policy Development 3 KPPIP is formed as a center of excellence for priority projects acceleration and preparation to achieve infrastructure development target KPPIP is mandated by Presidential Regulation No. 75/2014 j.o. Presidential Regulation No. 122/2016 in decision-making, project involvement from planning and capacity building for human resource. Through PR No. 122/2016, there are 2 new additional ministry as the member of KPPIP KPPIP MEMBERS SOME FUNCTIONS OF KPPIP Coordinating Minister of Economic Affairs Established standard quality of Pre-Feasibility 1 1 o Providing OBC facility for top-down projects Study/Outline Business Case (OBC) o Monitoring and debottlenecking of projects on economic issues 2 Provided facilities for review and revision/re-do and/or other project preparation (e.g: Coordinating Minister of Maritime Affairs – New Member Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)) o Overseeing and performs debottlenecking effort especially for issues in energy and transportation 3 Preparing action plans, carry out monitoring projects activities as well as conduc debottlenecking Minister of Finance strategies for priority projects o Reviewing and approving
    [Show full text]
  • 1St IRF Asia Regional Congress & Exhibition
    1st IRF Asia Regional Congress & Exhibition Bali, Indonesia November 17–19 , 2014 For Professionals. By Professionals. "Building the Trans-Asia Highway" Bali’s Mandara toll road Executive Summary International Road Federation Better Roads. Better World. 1 International Road Federation | Washington, D.C. ogether with the Ministry of Public Works Indonesia, we chose the theme “Building the Trans-Asia Highway” to bring new emphasis to a visionary project Tthat traces its roots back to 1959. This Congress brought the region’s stakeholders together to identify new and innovative resources to bridge the current financing gap, while also sharing case studies, best practices and new technologies that can all contribute to making the Trans-Asia Highway a reality. This Congress was a direct result of the IRF’s strategic vision to become the world’s leading industry knowledge platform to help countries everywhere progress towards safer, cleaner, more resilient and better connected transportation systems. The Congress was also a reflection of Indonesia’s rising global stature. Already the largest economy in Southeast Asia, Indonesia aims to be one of world’s leading economies, an achievement that will require the continued development of not just its own transportation network, but also that of its neighbors. Thank you for joining us in Bali for this landmark regional event. H.E. Eng. Abdullah A. Al-Mogbel IRF Chairman Minister of Transport, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Indonesia Hosts the Region’s Premier Transportation Meeting Indonesia was the proud host to the 1st IRF Asia Regional Congress & Exhibition, a regional gathering of more than 700 transportation professionals from 52 countries — including Ministers, senior national and local government officials, academics, civil society organizations and industry leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation for Sustainability
    PT JASA MARGA (Persero) Tbk TRANSFORMATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY 2017 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Highlights of Company Message from the Board Message from the Board Concerning Sustainability Profile of Commissioners of Directors Sustainability Report Performance 2017 HIGHLIGHTS OF SUSTAINABILITY 5 COMPANY PROFILE 20 PERFORMANCE REPORT OF THE BOARD OF 37 REPORT OF THE BOARD OF 43 COMMISSIONERS DIRECTORS 49 57 CONCERNING SUSTAINABLE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT GOVERNANCE 2017 2 PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk. 2017 Sustainability Report Sustainable Sustainability GRI Standards POJK No. 51 of 2017 Indeks GRI Governance Performance Application Statement Reference Standards Opsi “Core” TABLE OF CONTENTS THEME 3 HIGHLIGHTS OF SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE 6 Economic Aspect 6 Environmental Aspect 8 Social Aspect 10 AWARD AND CERTIFICATIONS 12 IMPORTANT EVENTS 14 SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE ASPECTS OVERVIEW 17 A COMPANY PROFILE 20 Vision, Mission, and Sustainability Values 21 Brief Profile 24 Scale of Business 26 Employee Profile 27 Policy in Employment Opportunities 31 Share Ownership Information 32 Operation Area 32 Business Field 33 Membership of the Association 35 Significant Changes 35 B MANAJEMENT REPORT 36 Message from the Board of Commissioners 37 Message from the Board of Director 43 C ABOUT SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2017 49 D SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE 57 Structure of Governance 58 Position of GMS, Board of Commissioners and Directors 60 Risk Management Control 75 Stakeholders Management 77 Supply Chain 80 The Problems Encountered 81 E SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE 84 Economic Aspect 84 Social Aspect 85 Environmental Aspect 98 Product Responsibility 102 FEED BACK SHEET 106 STATEMENTS OF GRI STANDARDS APPLICATION 107 INDEX OF FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY REGULATION (FSA) NO.51 108 INDEX OF GRI STANDARDS IN OPTION “CORE” 109 PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk.
    [Show full text]
  • SWISS CHAM INDONESIA “Benefit and Incentive for Investment in Special Economic Zone”
    SWISS CHAM INDONESIA “Benefit and Incentive for Investment in Special Economic Zone” www.kendalindustrialpark.co.id Words of Wishdom “ Every year visit a place you have not been before, and do something you have not done before.” - Dalai Lama- Benefits & Incentive in Special Economic Zones & Brief in KEK Kendal 1. What is Special Economic Zone (SEZ) 2. Benefits & Incentives of SEZ 3. Short Brief of KEK Kendal 4. Video of KEK Kendal What is Special Economic Zone (SEZ) (Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus) • A SEZ is an area in which business and trade laws are different from the rest of the country • It is located within a country’s national borders and their aims include increased trade balance, employment, increased investment, job creation • Attract both foreign direct investment (FDI) and local investments SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE IN INDONESIA 15 SEZ as of Nov 30, 2020 5 INCENTIVES IN SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE COMPETITIVENESS INVESTMENT INCENTIVES INSEZ CORPORATE INCOME TAX (CIT) Categories Applied in all SEZ Remarks • 10 years zero CIT for minimum investment of Tax Holidays USD6.9 million (IDR100 billion) • 15 years zero CIT for minimum investment of Corporate USD34.5 million (IDR500 billion) For Income Tax Business • 20 years zero CIT for minimum investment of Investors (CIT) USD67 million (IDR1 trillion) 6 INVESTMENT INCENTIVES INSEZ VALUE ADDED TAX Categories Applied in all SEZ Remarks • Delivery from domestic territory: For Expat only From • VAT not collected for: outside SEZ • delivery of taxable goods • delivery of taxable services: For domestic
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 Selection of Candidate Cities for Demonstration Project
    Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN Final Report APPENDIX 3 SELECTION OF CANDIDATE CITIES FOR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Table A3-1 Long List Cities (No.1-No.62: “abc” city name order) Source: JICA Project Team NIPPON KOEI CO.,LTD. PAC ET C ORP. EIGHT-JAPAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC. A3-1 Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN Final Report Table A3-2 Long List Cities (No.63-No.124: “abc” city name order) Source: JICA Project Team NIPPON KOEI CO.,LTD. PAC ET C ORP. EIGHT-JAPAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC. A3-2 Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN Final Report Table A3-3 Long List Cities (No.125-No.186: “abc” city name order) Source: JICA Project Team NIPPON KOEI CO.,LTD. PAC ET C ORP. EIGHT-JAPAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC. A3-3 Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN Final Report Table A3-4 Long List Cities (No.187-No.248: “abc” city name order) Source: JICA Project Team NIPPON KOEI CO.,LTD. PAC ET C ORP. EIGHT-JAPAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC. A3-4 Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN Final Report Table A3-5 Long List Cities (No.249-No.310: “abc” city name order) Source: JICA Project Team NIPPON KOEI CO.,LTD. PAC ET C ORP. EIGHT-JAPAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC. A3-5 Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN Final Report Table A3-6 Long List Cities (No.311-No.372: “abc” city name order) Source: JICA Project Team NIPPON KOEI CO.,LTD. PAC ET C ORP.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Highway Handbook
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC ASIAN HIGHWAY HANDBOOK UNITED NATIONS New York, 2003 ST/ESCAP/2303 The Asian Highway Handbook was prepared under the direction of the Transport and Tourism Division of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. The team of staff members of the Transport and Tourism Division who prepared the Handbook comprised: Fuyo Jenny Yamamoto, Tetsuo Miyairi, Madan B. Regmi, John R. Moon and Barry Cable. Inputs for the tourism- related parts were provided by an external consultant: Imtiaz Muqbil. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has been issued without formal editing. CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION TO THE ASIAN HIGHWAY………………. 1 1. Concept of the Asian Highway Network……………………………… 1 2. Identifying the Network………………………………………………. 2 3. Current status of the Asian Highway………………………………….. 3 4. Formalization of the Asian Highway Network……………………….. 7 5. Promotion of the Asian Highway……………………………………... 9 6. A Vision of the Future………………………………………………… 10 II. ASIAN HIGHWAY ROUTES IN MEMBER COUNTRIES…... 16 1. Afghanistan……………………………………………………………. 16 2. Armenia……………………………………………………………….. 19 3. Azerbaijan……………………………………………………………... 21 4. Bangladesh……………………………………………………………. 23 5. Bhutan…………………………………………………………………. 27 6. Cambodia……………………………………………………………… 29 7. China…………………………………………………………………... 32 8. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea……………………………… 36 9. Georgia………………………………………………………………... 38 10. India…………………………………………………………………… 41 11. Indonesia………………………………………………………………. 45 12. Islamic Republic of Iran………………………………………………. 49 13 Japan…………………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • AR Waskita 2016.Pdf
    2016 LAPORAN TAHUNAN ANNUAL REPORT PEMBANGUNAN BERKELANJUTAN Sustainable Growth Kilas Kinerja 2016 Laporan Manajemen Profil Perusahaan Tinjauan Pendukung Bisnis Flashback Performance 2016 Management Report Company Profile Supporting Business Review Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Sustainable Growth Guna mendukung penyediaan infrastruktur startegis yang merata di seluruh tanah air, Waskita senantiasa bersinergi dengan pemerintah dalam mewujudkan rencana-rencana yang telah disusun. Dengan kerja keras, inovasi dan komitmen yang kuat, Perseroan melakukan upaya optimal sepanjang 2016 dalam meraih target bisnis maupun peningkatan terhadap portofolio proyek. Hal tersebut menjadi modal utama bagi seluruh insan Perseroan dalam mewujudkan karya nyata yang memiliki dampak keberlanjutan tidak hanya bagi Perseroan namun juga bangsa, masyarakat dan dunia. Dengan landasan tersebut, PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk mempersembahkan Laporan Tahunan 2016 dengan tema “Pembangunan Berkelanjutan”. Tema berkelanjutan yang kami sampaikan memiliki pemahaman sebagai upaya tanpa henti Perseroan untuk lebih meningkatkan perannya tidak hanya untuk masa sekarang namun juga bagi masa depan bangsa. Komitmen tersebut diwujudkan dalam bentuk realisasi kerja yang dipaparkan secara holistik melalui penyajian yang komprehensif. Laporan tahunan yang disajikan akan memuat uraian kinerja Perseroan dari aspek bisnis, operasional, tata kelola serta peningkatkan peran Perseroan bagi lingkungan, sosial kemasyarakatan dan pelanggan. Apa yang menjadi catatan dalam laporan ini tentunya menjadi
    [Show full text]
  • Company Update
    COMPANY UPDATE June 2021 CORPORATE STRUCTURE OF WASKITA GROUP Waskita Group, which has vertically integrated business lines, has supported PT Waskita Toll Road (WTR), particularly with the capability and extensive experience in the field of construction and precast concrete. Waskita is one of the leading construction companies in Indonesia. Waskita has more than 50 years experience in construction business with proven track records. 99.99% 87,595% 59.99% 99.99% . Selected Waskita projects : Bali – Benoa Gempol – Mandara Toll Road Toll Road Pasuruan Toll Road WBP is supplying precast concrete to support the WBP has business activities in the field of execution of Waskita’s projects, including WTR toll roads, marketing, production, design, development and hence the quality of concrete can always be maintained. expedition of precast. Currently, WBP is one of the biggest precast and WTR collaborates with Waskita, as the contractor readymix concrete manufacturing in Indonesia. of the projects, which ensures the projects . WBP has 11 concrete plants with the production completion time and quality. capacity of 3.25 million tons every year. Selected WBP Projects: Enhancing WTR's ability to complete the project on schedule with the best quality Nusa Dua – Gempol– Gempol – Ngurah Rai Toll Porong Toll Pasuruan Toll 2 Overview of PT Waskita Toll Road (“WTR”) Currently, WTR owns 13 toll roads, of which 10 toll roads are already in operation and when all of the projects are completed, it will become a leading toll road company with a total length of ±687,69 km.* CORPORATE STRUCTURE* Transjava Sumatera Area 60.00% 39.50 % 30.00% 98.18% PT Waskita Toll Road (“WTR”), established PT PT PT Hutama PT on June 19, 2014 is a subsidiary of Waskita Pemalang Waskita Marga Waskita that focuses on investing and managing toll Batang Tol Trans Jawa Waskita Sriwijaya road in Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Q--Daily News-2015-Jun-20150610-Te.Mdi
    Thursday, 11 June 2015 CONSTRUCTION SECTOR/COMPANY UPDATE BUY Waskita Karya Target Price, IDR 2,150 Upside 28.7% On higher ground WSKT IJ/WSKT.JK Post-rights issue, Waskita will be the largest state contractor, thus the company will Last Price, IDR 1,670 have no problems in financing either its future investments or working capital, No. of shares, mn (post-rights) 13,567 ensuring, we believe, a brighter future for the company and a faster pace of growth. Going forward, Waskita’s ventures into toll road investments should boost its order Market Cap, IDR bn 22,657 book and lead to higher profitability as well. All in all, our post-rights valuation (US$ mn) 1,702 suggests TP of Rp2,150. Waskita remains as one of our Top Picks in our construction 3M T/O, US$mn 1.6 sector universe. BUY. Last Recommendation The company that delivers 22-May-2015 BUY IDR 2,100 Backed by its growing order book and sound reputation, Waskita growth story has continued to 04-May-2015 BUY IDR 2,100 unfold and earnings quality has improved. Post-IPO, Waskita successfully restructured its debts 05-Mar-2015 BUY IDR 2,100 and, at the same time, the IPO proceeds gave the company more flexibility in its balance sheet to WSKT relative to JCI Index work on larger projects. Subsequently, Waskita’s total carry-over projects in 2015 stood at Rp20.3tn, or 2.0x its FY14 total revenues – meaning that projects are sufficient to fuel growth. All in all, the IDR WSKT (LHS) Relative to JCI Index (RHS) % 2,000 155 new government’s infrastructure acceleration program should benefit Waskita given that government-related projects remain very important to the company.
    [Show full text]