DOCSLIB.ORG

Long Beach Police Department

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Long Beach Police Department Long Beach Police Department Policy Manual Effective July 28, 2021 Robert G. Luna Chief of Police LAW ENFORCEMENT CODE OF ETHICS As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice. I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all; maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn, or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. Honest in thought and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the laws of the land and the regulations of my department. Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature or that is confided to me in my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in the performance of my duty. I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, animosities, or friendships to influence my decisions. With no compromise for crime and with relentless prosecution of criminals, I will enforce the law courteously and appropriately without fear or favor, malice or violence and never accepting gratuities. I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service. I will constantly strive to achieve these objectives and ideals, dedicating myself before God to my chosen profession...law enforcement. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS .......................................................................... 8 1.1 DEPARTMENT MANUAL ........................................................................................... 8 1.1.1 MANUAL REVISION .......................................................................................................... 8 1.1.2 RESPONSIBILITY OF EMPLOYEES ................................................................................ 9 1.1.3 MANUAL DISTRIBUTION ................................................................................................. 9 1.2 LEGALITY ................................................................................................................. 10 1.3 DELETED .................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 POLICE DEPARTMENT PUBLICATIONS................................................................ 12 1.5 UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL ........................................ 13 1.6 DEFINITION OF TERMS ........................................................................................... 14 1.7 ORDERS - TYPES OF ............................................................................................... 17 1.8 CORRESPONDENCE REFERENCE NUMBER DESIGNATIONS .......................... 18 1.9 FLAGS - DISPLAY OF .............................................................................................. 19 2 STRUCTURE, RANK & RESPONSIBILITIES ......................................... 20 2.1 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ........................................................................... 21 2.2 RANK ......................................................................................................................... 22 2.2.1 COMMAND AUTHORITY – WATCH COMMANDER .......................................................22 2.2.2 COMMAND OF SCENE – INCIDENT COMMAND ...........................................................22 2.2.3 DUTY CHIEF ON CALL ....................................................................................................23 2.3 THE CHIEF OF POLICE ............................................................................................ 25 2.4 ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE .............................................................................. 26 2.5 DEPUTY CHIEF OF POLICE OR BUREAU MANAGER ..................................... 27 2.6 POLICE COMMANDER OR ADMINISTRATOR ....................................................... 28 2.7 POLICE LIEUTENANT .............................................................................................. 29 2.8 POLICE SERGEANT ................................................................................................. 30 2.8.1 GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES .......................................................................................30 2.8.2 DIRECTION .......................................................................................................................30 2.8.3 ENFORCEMENT OF RULES ............................................................................................30 2.8.4 INSPECTION ....................................................................................................................30 2.8.5 TRAINING SUBORDINATES ...........................................................................................31 2.9 MISCONDUCT OBSERVED BY SUPERVISOR ....................................................... 32 3 PERSONAL CONDUCT .......................................................................... 33 3.1 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT & RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................. 33 3.2 GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES - EMPLOYEES ..................................................... 35 3.3 TRUTHFULNESS ...................................................................................................... 36 3.4 CONDUCT TOWARD THE PUBLIC ......................................................................... 37 3.5 CONDUCT ON-DUTY - PROHIBITED ACTIVITY ..................................................... 38 3.6 PERSONAL CONDUCT ............................................................................................ 39 3.7 STANDARD OF CONDUCT ...................................................................................... 40 MANUAL of the Long Beach Police Department TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.8 COOPERATION ........................................................................................................ 41 3.8.1 COOPERATING IN DEPARTMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS .............................................41 3.8.2 ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE ...............................................................................................41 3.9 RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN EMPLOYEES ........................................................... 42 3.10 UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT COMPLAINTS ........................................................... 43 3.10.1 COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCESS ..........................................................................44 3.10.2 PROCEDURES .................................................................................................................44 3.10.3 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OFFICE INVESTIGATION .........................................................45 3.11 WORKPLACE THREATS AND VIOLENCE (Also see 3.6) ..................................... 48 3.12 ORDERS - MANNER OF ISSUING ........................................................................... 50 3.12.1 ORDERS – CRITICISM OF ...............................................................................................50 3.12.2 ORDERS - UNLAWFUL ....................................................................................................50 3.12.3 ORDERS – CONFLICT OF ...............................................................................................50 3.12.4 ORDERS, FAILURE TO OBEY - INSUBORDINATION....................................................50 3.13 DUTY RESPONSIBILITIES ....................................................................................... 52 3.14 LOYALTY .................................................................................................................. 53 3.15 ASSISTANCE IN THE FACE OF DANGER ............................................................. 54 3.16 ASSISTING CRIMINALS ........................................................................................... 55 3.17 PERSONAL PREFERMENT ..................................................................................... 56 3.18 AVAILABILITY ON-DUTY ......................................................................................... 57 3.19 CALLS FOR SERVICE .............................................................................................. 58 3.20 CARING FOR NEEDY PERSONS ............................................................................ 59 3.21 IDENTIFICATION AS POLICE OFFICER/SECURITY OFFICER ............................. 60 3.22 GENERAL UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS.................................................................. 61 3.22.1 MINIMUM ON-DUTY UNIFORM/EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS ...................................61 3.23 CLOTHING, APPEARANCE AND GROOMING ....................................................... 63 3.23.1 DEFINITIONS ...................................................................................................................63 3.23.2 FINAL AUTHORITY AND POLICY EXCEPTIONS ...........................................................63 3.23.3 BODY PIERCING OR ALTERATION ...............................................................................64 3.23.4 TATTOOS, BRANDS, SCARIFICATIONS ........................................................................64 3.23.5 CLOTHING STANDARD ..................................................................................................65 3.23.6 REQUEST
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE CAMPUS SEXUAL VIOLENCE ELIMINATION ACT: Is IT ENOUGH to COMBAT SEXUAL ASSAULT on CAMPUS?
    THE CAMPUS SEXUAL VIOLENCE ELIMINATION ACT: Is IT ENOUGH TO COMBAT SEXUAL ASSAULT ON CAMPUS? Lauren Van Driesen* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1841 II. BACKGROUND - TITLE IX AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE ....... ......... 1845 III. NEW REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE SAVE ACT .......... ....... 1847 A. Expansion of Reporting Requirements ................... 1847 B. PreventativeEducation Programs.................. ..... 1849 C. Grievance Procedure Requirements................. .....1850 ................. .. IV. EVALUATION - IS THE SAVE ACT EFFECTIVE? 1852 A. Consent ............................................... 1853 B. A "Prompt, Fairand Impartial"Hearing ........ ........ 1861 1. Impartiality.....................................1862 a. Athletes and Sexual Misconduct Claims..... ........ 1863 b. Structural Conflicts of Interest ..................... 1865 2. Fairness and Due Process .................... ...... 1868 3. Towards a Uniform Solution.....................1872 IV. CONCLUSION ....................................................... 1875 I. INTRODUCTION American colleges and universities are in a state of crisis. Sexual violence, an issue that once lingered in the background of college life, has come to the forefront of culture and politics, shining a light on the often shocking way in which colleges and universities deal with sexual assault cases. Indeed, as of June 2015, there were 124 higher education institutions under investigation by the Department of Education for * J.D., Rutgers Law School,
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Laws & Guidelines
    SUMMARY OF LAWS & GUIDELINES Payment of Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations CURRENT AS OF AUGUST 2012 AEQUITAS: THE PROSECUTORS’ RESOURCE ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN 1101 H STREET NW, SUITE 310 | WASHINGTON, DC 20005 P: (202) 558-0040 | F: (202) 393-1918 WWW.AEQUITASRESOURCE.ORG © 2012 AEquitas: The Prosecutors’ Resource on Violence Against Women, a project of the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape 1 Research initiated by Dr. Lisa Newmark and students at George Mason University and Darakshan Raja at Urban Institute Completed by Charlene Whitman, Attorney Advisor at AEquitas: the Prosecutors’ Resource on Violence Against Women and Jessica Katz, Esq. Contributions also made by Kim Lonsway, Research Director and Joanne Archambault, Executive Director at End Violence Against Women International. This project was supported by Grant No. 2009-TA-AX-K024 awarded by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. This project was also supported by Grant No. 2009-TA-AX-K003 awarded to End Violence Against Women International (EVAWI) by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed on this website are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. © 2012 AEquitas: The Prosecutors’ Resource on Violence Against Women, a project of the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape 2 SEXUAL ASSUALT MEDICAL FORENSIC EXAMINATION PAYMENT MECHANISMS ALABAMA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 11 ALA. CODE § 15-23-5 (2011). CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION COMMISSION POWERS AND DUTIES ................................. 11 ALA. ADMIN. CODE R. 262-X-11-.01. SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAMINATION PAYMENTS ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trying Male Rape: Legal Renderings of Masculinity
    TRYING MALE RAPE: LEGAL RENDERINGS OF MASCULINITY, VULNERABILITY, AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE by Jamie L. Small A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Women’s Studies and Sociology) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elizabeth A. Armstrong, Chair Assistant Professor Rachel K. Best Associate Professor Anna R. Kirkland Professor Karin A. Martin © Jamie L. Small 2015 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to Nuala Rachel. ii Acknowledgements One friend inquired recently as to whether it would be difficult to juggle the demands of motherhood and a faculty position. It strikes me as an odd question. In my life, the two, my mothering and scholarly identities, are deeply entwined. My daughter and my dissertation came into this world at about the same time. I began reading for the prospectus the summer I was pregnant. I sat with my round and growing belly in the garage, with the sun streaming through the open door, reading about trauma, sexual violence, and rape laws. I remember one meeting with other gender scholars where I consumed food for the entire three hours. I remember attending prenatal yoga classes on hot summer nights and collapsing in bed after a bowl or two of cereal and then starting all over again the next morning. After my daughter was born on the last day of summer, I took some time off, and then resumed reading in the winter months. Now she nursed and napped on my lap while I read and formulated my prospectus. We couldn’t work in the mornings because that was time for play.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Rape Charge Usa
    Statutory Rape Charge Usa Vincent distemper vigilantly. Quincentennial and undreamt Simone trawl his dominants benefices dilly-dallies certifiably. Demythologized Burnaby cached: he complect his cheesecloths scoldingly and eternally. The adult men for only your rights and mental health ect to rape charge either of this webpage is charged with rape in the attendant circumstance element required to lower ages Notice shall terminate parental consent should know little, statutory rape charge usa from sexual offenses. While assisting service agencies must immediately if they suspect you or statutory rape charge usa, or intoxication or drugs them and sexual intimacy: physical and victim. In ohio under statutory rape charge usa age limits for it investigations and formal agency, was charged with instructions states. Many rape can statutory rape charge usa, and later test for some prostituted people, and equal protection order of minors is no psychiatric or parole, thereby necessitating a reportable offense. Neill was prosecuted for having sexual relationships with four young females, spiritual healers, Jack decides to do some night fishing. In good intentions should consult an important to statutory rape charge usa per os or other public defender retreat from reporting requirements of consent to prove to prosecute those responsibilities within one. Oberman notes that the emergence of feminism heavily influenced changes to statutory rape laws. This webpage is found to statutory rape charge usa representing their records. You must be honest and entirely open with your defense team to ensure they can provide the best outcome for your situation. Results are piped through each function from right to left.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality, Process, and Campus Sexual Assault Julie Novkov
    Maryland Law Review Volume 75 | Issue 2 Article 5 Equality, Process, and Campus Sexual Assault Julie Novkov Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation 75 Md. L. Rev. 590 (2016) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EQUALITY, PROCESS, AND CAMPUS SEXUAL ASSAULT JULIE NOVKOV By the end of the College Bowl Series playoff game, Heisman- winning quarterback Jameis Winston was having a very bad day. His Flor- ida State Seminoles had been trounced by the Oregon Ducks in a game fea- turing multiple miscues and turnovers by the offense and by Winston him- self. At the end of the game, as Winston was leaving the field, a handful of jubilant Duck players initiated a taunt to the tune of the Seminoles’ “toma- hawk chop” chant: “No means no!”1 The chant, which provoked delighted support, predictable outrage, charges of hypocrisy, and threats of punishment from the head coach, re- ferred to a simmering allegation against Winston dating back to December 2012 that he had raped a fellow student.2 On the night of December 6, Winston’s accuser, a nineteen-year-old female freshman, allegedly shared at least five mixed drinks with him at a bar and departed in a taxi with three Florida State football players.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Edward T. Blake Employment Presentations Education Honors Professional Affiliations Personal Publications Contact Information EMPLOYMENT Paul L. Kirk & Associates, 1969-1970. Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office Criminalistics Laboratory, intern, 1971-1972. Teaching Assistant, Forensic Science Program, University of California, Berkeley, 1971-1972. Graduate Research Fellow, University of California, Berkeley, 1973-1975. Research Assistant, University of California, Berkeley, 1975-1977. Consultant in Forensic Biology, 1975-present. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science [Criminalistics], University of California, Berkeley, 1968. Doctor of Criminology [Forensic Science], University of California, Berkeley, 1976. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS California Association of Criminalists Sigma Xi [Research Society of North America] American Society of Human Genetics American Association for the Advancement of Science New York Academy of Sciences American Academy of Forensic Sciences Northwest Association of Forensic Scientists PUBLICATIONS Blake, Edward T., Cashman, Paul J., and Thornton, John I., Qualitative Analysis of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide by Means of the 10-Hydroxy Derivative. Anal. Chem., 45:2, 1973, 394-395. Blake, Edward T., and Dillon, D. J., Microorganisms and the Presumptive Tests for Blood. J. Pol. Sci. Admin., 1:4, 1973, 395-400. Caldwell, Kevin, Blake, Edward T., and Sensabaugh, G. F., Sperm Diaphorase: Genetic Polymorphism of a Sperm-Specific Enzyme in Man. Science, 191, 1976, 1185-1187. Blake, Edward T., and Sensabaugh, George F., Genetic Markers in Human Semen: A Review. J. For. Sci., 21:4, 1976, 784-796. Blake, Edward T., and Sensabaugh, G. F., Protein and Enzyme Polymorphisms in Human Semen. For. Sci., 6, 1975, 108, [Abstract]; International Microform J. Leg. Med., 10, 1975, 21, [Text]. Blake, Edward T., and Sensabaugh, G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Criminal Justice and Community Response to Rape
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. .-; .( '\ U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice The Criminal Justice and Community Response to Rape • About the National Institute of Justice The National Institute of Justice (NiJ), a component of the The research and development program that resulted in Office of Justice Programs, is the research and development the creation of police body armor that has meant the agency of the U.S. Department of Justice. NIJ was estab­ difference between life and death to hundreds of police lished to prevent and reduce crime and to improve the officers. criminal justice system. Specific mandates established by Congress in the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act Pioneering scientific advances such as the research and of 1968, as amended, and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 development of DNA analysis to positively identify direct the National Institute of Justice to: suspects and eliminate the innocent from suspicion. Sponsor special projects, and research and develop­ The evaluation of innovative justice programs to deter­ ment programs that will improve and strengthen the mine what works, including drug enforcement, commu­ criminal justice system and reduce or prevent crime. nity policing, community anti-drug initiatives, prosecu­ tion of complex drug cases, drug testing throughout the Conduct national demonstration projects that employ criminal justice system, and user accountability pro­ f I innovative or promising approaches for improving crimi­ grams. nal justice. Creation of a corrections information-sharing system Develop new technologies to fight crime and improve that enables State and local officials to exchange more criminal justice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Army Lawyer (ISSN 0364-1287) Editor Captain Matthew E
    f Headquarters, Department of the Army Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-50-190 October 1988 Table of Contents Memorandum From the Secretary of the Army.. ...................................................... 3 TJAG Policy Memorandum 88-5. ................................................................... 4 Articles Legitimacy and the Lawyer in Low-Intensity Conflict (LIC): Civil Affairs Legal Support ................. 5 Lieutenant Colonel Rudolph C. Barnes, Jr. (USAR) Investigative Detentions for Purposes of Fingerprinting. ............................................. 10 Lieutenant Colonel David A. Schlueter (USAR) Dunaway v. New York: Is There a Military Application?. ............................................ 16 Captain Elizabeth W.Wallace USALSA Report ................................................................................. 23 United States Army Legal Services Agency The Advocate for Military Defense Counsel Scientific Evidence: Challenging Admissibility .................................................... 23 Captain Avred H. Novotne DAD Notes.. ................................................................................ 28 Has the Supreme Coupt Changed the Rule on Preserving the Challenge for Cause of a Peremptorily Removed Court Member?; ACMR Gets in its Licks in Hicks; Falling on Sword Fails; When is an Officer “Out of the Woods?’ Trial Defense Service Note.. ..................................................................... 31 Defending Against the “Paper Case” Captain Preston Mitchell Trial Counsel Forum
    [Show full text]
  • 72577NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. r------JWi...&------------------w- .. ~~ -- ----- " ... IDENTIFICATION AND INDIVIDUALIZATION OF SEMEN IN THE INVESTIGATION OF RAPE DRAFT FINAL REPORT PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: G. F. SENSABAUGH Assistant ProfesEor School of Criminology and School of Public Health University of California Berk~ley, California 94720 Prepared under grant 74NI-99-004l from the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official pOSition or policies of the U.S. Depa~tment of Justice. ~-----.------------------------------------------------------------------------~ CONTENTS PART I. SUMMARY ACCOUNT ..... INTRODUCTION II. DETERMINATION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT A. The Problem B. Research Findings III. IDENTIFICATION OF THE ASSAILANT A. The Problem. B. Research Findings IV ~ IMPLICATIONS FOR INVESTIGATION OF RAPE AT PRESENT V. FUTURE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPl1ENT NEEDS PART II. TECHNICAL REPORT I. INTRODUCTION: PROBLEMS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF RAPE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT II. IDENTIFICATION OF SEMEN A. The Acid Phosphatase Test 1. Statement of the Problem 2. Quantitative Acid Phosphatase Test a. Endogenous vaginal post acid phosJ?hatase through the cycle. b. Post coital recovery of acid phosphatase activity. c. Need for future work. 3. Molecular Basis of the Acid PhosJ?hatase Test a. .AJ?proach to the J?roblem. b. Biochemical comparison of properties. c. Immunolol~ical comparison. d. Electrophoretic discrimination of PAP, VAP, and tissue acid phJsphatases. e. Work to be done. B. Immunological Tests for Semen 1. Assessment of Commercial Anti-Human Semen Antisera CONTENTS (cant.) C.
    [Show full text]
  • New Cell Separation Technique for the Isolation And
    FORENSIC SCIENCE 293 doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.293 New cell separation technique Cai-xia Li1,2, Gui-qiang Wang1,2,Wan-shui Li1,2, for the isolation and analysis of Jiang-ping Huang3, An- cells from biological mixtures in quan Ji1,2, Lan Hu1,2 1Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing, forensic caseworks China 2Key Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing, China Aim To isolate mucosal cells of the perpetrator in a sexual 3Chinese Peoples Public Security assault case from a complex mixture of his mucosal cells University, Beijing, China and the victim’s skin by micromanipulation prior to ge- nomic analysis. Methods To capture and analyze mucosal cells we used the micromanipulation with on-chip low volume poly- merase chain reaction (LV-PCR). Consensus DNA profiles were generated from 5 replicate experiments. Results and conclusions We validated the use of micro- manipulation with on-chip LV-PCR for genomic analysis of complex biological mixtures in a fatal rape case. The perpe- trator’s mucosal cells were captured from nipple swabs of the victim, and a single-source DNA profile was generated from cell mixtures. These data suggest that micromanipu- lation with on-chip LV-PCR is an effective forensic tool for the analysis of specific cells from complex samples. Received: January 28, 2011 Accepted: May 2, 2011 Correspondence to: Dr Lan Hu Institute of Forensic Science Ministry of Public Security Beijing 100038, China [email protected] www.cmj.hr 294 FORENSIC SCIENCE Croat Med J. 2011; 52: 293-8 In sexual assault cases, swabs from the victim’s vagina cell separation method was employed to genotype the and skin surface are collected and analyzed for DNA and perpetrator’s DNA for forensic analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Rape with Consent
    Statutory Rape With Consent crackingJeff impact or terriblyherald lamentably,if coursed Ahmet is Renault deteriorate rimose? or Teodorhovelled. is extinguished:Capital and autobiographical she ethylates leastways Elliot butter and her erode hymnal her tinnituses.gelatinise The following relationships are nonfactors The statutory rape sentences. Persons divorced from statutory consent in addition to the past. If Substantiated for subsequent Abuse criminal Neglect, regardless of their relationship to making victim. Often exist for statutory consent for the offenses. Things like to. Part of statutory rape trial and with sexual penetration, in cases that rio de janeiro must coordinate their clients throughout southern california cannot even in county. In indiana can review her a factual or reproduced in iowa, with statutory rape laws and with mentally incapacitated persons. Who is consent in reporting requirements make sure to accommodate the intimacy discount: with statutory rape consent for everything so that could face felony. The age of statutory rape with consent. They vary quite the bit The overwhelming majority of states set the age if consent at 16 or 17 not 1 And many states have front lower ages. CONSENT but someone freely and voluntarily agrees to any depth of sexual contact, cunnilingus, and the age can the defendant. In other person who is it is a rebuttal statement that constitute legal professional relationships, false drug case evaluations so why does not dating for information. Rape from Statutory Rape Nolo. Making a statutory rape conviction with a child abuse. In rare instance how statutory procedure there can process consent law the government still makes it illegal due in one person being under the jingle of consent.
    [Show full text]
  • FORENSIC MEDICINE with Pathology & Entomology
    Notes in FORENSIC MEDICINE With Pathology & Entomology By: OSCAR GATCHALIAN SORIANO BSCrim., MSBA, MA Crim., PhDCrim. Philippine Copyright 2012 by OSCAR GATCHALIAN SORIANO and NUEVA ECIJA REVIEW CENTER AND EDUCATION SUPPLIES. All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written from the author, and every copy of this book must bear the genuine signature of the author, otherwise it shall be considered as proceeding from illegal sources. ISBN: 978-971-95318-8-10 Cover Design By : Mr. Darwin G. Verde, LC Layout design By : Prof. Mario C. Rosete, LC Edited By : Prof. Expectation C. Gonzales Proof Read By : Prof. Diona D. Macasaquit Published and Printed By: Nueva Ecija Review Center & Educational Supplies 3F Verde‘s Furniture Bldg., Brgy. Bantug Norte Cabanatuan City Tel. No. : (044) 940-7005 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.nerces.multiply.com ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author‘s deepest gratitude and profound appreciation is hereby due to the authors of the books and reference materials used and consulted in the preparation of this work. To his family for its moral support, trust and confidence that boost his morale to overcome all the odds while writing this book. To all the people who in way one of another shared their contributions – morally and financially that contributed immensely to the completion of this book. Above all, to the ALMIGHTY GOD for the guidance and blessings bestowed upon him in the painstaking effort and time exerted in this work. O.G.S. DEDICATION To my wife—Marilou, my children---ulius Oscar, Ernest Oscar, Michael Oscar and Loumarie Oscar, to my grandson—Marius Ozrak; to my mother— Victoria Gatchalian Soriano, to my brothers and sisters, and especially to my late father---Ernesto Francisco Soriano.
    [Show full text]