An Introduction to Direct Current Distribution Grids

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Introduction to Direct Current Distribution Grids AN INTRODUCTION TO DIRECT CURRENT DISTRIBUTION GRIDS Initiation of: DC – Road to its full potential JB Woudstra1 , P. van Willigenburg1 , BBJ Groenewald2 , H. Stokman3, S. De Jonge4,5, S. Willems4,5 1The Hague University of Applied Sciences (THU), Delft, Netherlands 2Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT), Cape Town, South Africa 3DC Current b.v., Aalsmeer, The Netherlands 4GROUP T – University College Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 5CORE cvba-so, Leuven, Belgium ABSTRACT Electricity consumption worldwide is and regional operating Small and Medium continuously on the rise due to the load Entrepreneurs (SME’s) to improve their requirements for the electrification of innovative capacity and maintain their transportation, houses, offices, factories and competitive advantage in the Netherlands and many other facilities. However, the use of worldwide. sustainable electricity in urban surroundings is on the rise: for example, solar panels on roofs of The paper will conclude by arguing for the buildings. creation of low voltage DC distribution grids to avoid DC-to-AC and AC-to-DC conversions, These loads and sustainable electricity sources stressing the perceived advantages of low voltage have one thing in common - Direct Current. Solid grids in terms of sustainability. State appliances define the new electric world. The introduction of these DC loads and Keywords: knowledge transfer; industrial sustainable DC electricity sources to the current partners; efficiency; material saving; lifespan grid could contribute to changes in the behavior 1. INTRODUCTION of the current electricity grid – although not all these effects are beneficial to the grid. The The continual growing demand for electricity current grid provides a very stable and very necessitates the consideration of natural resources to reliable supply for all its users. This may not be a generate electricity. However, it is necessary not certainty in the near future, especially in densely only to generate electricity but also to consider the populated areas, such as The Netherlands and losses and cost involved with the different conversions between AC and DC power sources and Belgium, where AC transportation and loads.. The Netherlands has seen growing demand distribution grids are facing more and more for electricity due to, for example, the increase in: stability and reliability issues. Their common ground is the re-discovery of Direct Current and • Electrical transport: trains, cars, motor its applications. bikes and scooters • Cloud storage and data centers This paper aims primarily to illustrate the need • Use of Air-conditioning to consider Direct Current Grids in the In the future, a trend towards full electric is Netherlands. Additionally, it describes the expected. But also an increase in energy sources ensuing research and educational programs providing DC power is expected. being developed around Direct Current Grids to support this need. Finally, it promotes the creation of strong networks to transfer knowledge from knowledge institutes to local The growth of sustainable energy plants in urban and frequency and connection to the grid is only possible industrial areas creates new possibilities and new via a power converter (AC-DC-AC). If almost all problems (challenges). Among the possibilities is loads need DC as a supply voltage, why do we use the alleviation of electricity supply from current Alternating Current (AC) for the transportation and generators. One of the challenges is the introduction of DC into the current AC grids. This may cause an distribution of electrical energy? oversupply of DC leading to possible harmonic distortions and instability in the AC grid. Where It therefore appears to be logical to reconsider the does one start and what does one do? The common possibility of creating a low voltage DC distribution factor is Direct Current at the origin and at the load. grid to avoid conversions between AC/DC. The advantages of low voltage DC grids are higher Low voltage Direct Current grids are not something efficiency, material saving and longer lifespan of new. Thomas Alva Edison patented in 1880 the first apparatus. incandescent light bulb and initiated the construction of the first DC-power station in Pearl Street, New Due to this renewed interest in DC the authors and York, including a network that supplied 110 V DC fifteen members of various industries in the to 59 clients. In that time it was not possible to Netherlands met to decide on a strategy to revive DC transform DC to a high voltage level to make it grids. To do this, the consensus was to introduce a possible to transport DC-energy over a long new research and educational program to consider distance. the advantages and disadvantages of scaled DC grids. This new program aims to generate Nikola Tesla conceived the concept of alternating knowledge and strong networks to transfer current in 1886, together with the concept of using knowledge from knowledge institutes to local and transformers to step up the voltage. This causes a regional operating companies (SME’s), improving proportional reduction in current, therefore inducing their innovative capacity and maintaining their voltage drops and losses. This was the beginning of competitive advantage. the development of AC-grids. With the invention of high voltage power electronic 2. DC: BACK TO THE FUTURE devices, direct current has made a comeback. Long high voltage direct current (HVDC) lines and cables The electricity timeline is shown in figure 1. Before are on the rise. Direct current is also present in 1880 electricity was purely experimental. With the distribution grids from 230 V to 50 kV. Photovoltaic invention of the light bulb in 1879 it became more (PV) panels produce a DC output voltage and when relevant; everyone wanted to use electrical lighting. connected to current grids the Figure 1 Electricity time line DC output must be converted to AC. Wind turbines Batteries were no longer enough to satisfy the produce an AC output voltage with variable energy demands, raising the need for DC-generators. 2.1 War of the currents + Sustainable sources and users are working mostly with DC Thomas Alva Edison (1847 – 1931) initiated the + Lower losses with transport on high powers construction of the first DC-power station in Pearl (HVDC cables) Street, New York, including a network that supplied + Fewer conversions, on higher frequencies 110 V DC to 59 clients. In many other places DC + Possible to transport more power over a cable or networks were used as well. Soon after the line with the same cross section + No reactive power realization struck: DC power lines are limited in + No power factor problems their length due to voltage drop constraints. + Reliable power line communication + Longer lifespan loads and components Nikola Tesla (1856 – 1943) conceived the concept + of alternating current in 1886, together with the No short circuit power concept of using transformers to step up the voltage. + Reduced use of raw materials This causes a proportional reduction in current, − Safety (still) not standardized therefore inducing voltage drops and losses. An − Mechanical switching is difficult impolite campaign raged in the late 1880’s between − Standardization only for high voltage DC and Tesla and Edison, the so-called “War of the not for low voltage DC currents.” Tesla emerged as winner, marking the − Not commonly known beginning of the AC-grid. 2.2 DC Comeback After the invention of the transistor in 1947 by John Bardeen, the electronic revolution started. The invention of high voltage power electronic devices in particular has made a comeback for direct current possible. Long high voltage direct current (HVDC) lines and cables are now used more often. In addition to HVDC, direct current is present in residential and urban grids from 230 V to 50 kV. PV-panels produce a DC-voltage. Wind turbines produce an AC output voltage with variable frequency; connection to the grid is only possible via a power converter (AC-DC- AC). Almost all loads need DC as supply voltage. In figure 2 some DC sources and users are shown. 2.3 Advantages and disadvantages Below are some advantages and disadvantages of AC and DC. 2.3.1 Alternating current Figure 2 Some DC-Sources and Users 2.4 Saving, efficiency and lifespan + Efficient transformers This research program aims to search for savings of + Switching without sparks material and energy. Furthermore it is important to + Securing can be selective discover the lifespan of the DC tools. The lifespan + Widespread use of AC equipment is better defined.. Is it necessary − Reactive power that the lifespan of DC equipment is as long as some − Power factor AC-equipment (40 years)? Perhaps it is cheaper to − Losses with high power transport renew DC installations every 10 years. In this case, it is important that the source materials are easily − Short circuit power needed (certainly with obtainable and recyclable. decentralized energy production) − Difficult to connect different grids with each Figure 3 shows a normal three phase, 3 kVA, 50 HZ other AC transformer 400/20V 150A with a weight of40 kg and a DC transformer 350/16V 200A 3200W. 2.3.2 Direct Current The transformer used in the DC/DC converter weights 0,4 kg, the frequency is 30 kHz. The electronics and housing weights 2,6 kg, for a total of Table 2 DC world 3kg. PV ±25 DC 350 DC panels – transport – load 350 V 20 V DC DC DC transport is more efficient (±2,5%) than AC transport due to the higher voltage used: 350 V instead of 230 V. The overall efficiency is ±92%, resulting in an energy savings of around 10%. This figure gives the energy savings possible for a household, and considers only internal energy distribution. Additional savings are expected from Figure 3 AC and DC transformer of 3 kVA the used materials. Because DC systems require less current than AC systems, less copper, is needed.
Recommended publications
  • Investigating Hidden Flexibilities Provided by Power-To-X Consid- Ering Grid Support Strategies
    InVESTIGATING Hidden FleXIBILITIES ProVIDED BY Power-to-X Consid- ERING Grid Support StrATEGIES Master Thesis B. Caner YAgcı˘ Intelligent Electrical POWER Grids Investigating Hidden Flexibilities Provided by Power-to-X Considering Grid Support Strategies Master Thesis by B. Caner Yağcı to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Tuesday September 14, 2020 at 9:30. Student number: 4857089 Project duration: December 2, 2019 – September 14, 2020 Thesis committee: Dr. Milos Cvetkovic, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. ir. J. L. Rueda Torres, TU Delft Dr. L. M. Ramirez Elizando TU Delft This thesis is confidential and cannot be made public until September 14, 2020. An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Preface First of all, I would like to thank PhD. Digvijay Gusain and Dr. Milos Cvetkovic for not only teaching me the answers through this journey, but also giving me the perception of asking the right questions that lead simple ideas into unique values. I would also like to thank my family Alican, Huriye, U˘gur, Gökhan who have been supporting me from the beginning of this journey and more. You continue inspiring me to find my own path and soul, even from miles away. Your blessing is my treasure in life... My friends, Onurhan and Berke. You encourage me and give me confidence to be my best in any scene. You are two extraordinary men who, I know, will always be there when I need. Finally, I would like to thank TU Delft staff and my colleagues in TU Delft for making this journey enter- taining and illuminative for me.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Cogeneration in Large Industrial Projects
    COGENERATION USE OF COGENERATION IN LARGE INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS (RECENT ADVANCES IN COGENERATION?) PRESENTER: JIM LONEY, PE [email protected] 281-295-7606 COGENERATION • WHAT IS COGENERATION? • Simultaneous generation of electricity and useful thermal energy (steam in most cases) • WHY COGENERATION? • Cogeneration is more efficient • Rankine Cycle – about 40% efficiency • Combined Cycle – about 60% efficiency • Cogeneration – about 87% efficiency • Why doesn’t everyone use only cogeneration? COGENERATION By Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung - https://www.flickr.com/photos/boellstiftung/38359636032, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=79343425 COGENERATION GENERATION SYSTEM LOSSES • Rankine Cycle – about 40% efficiency • Steam turbine cycle using fossil fuel • Most of the heat loss is from the STG exhaust • Some heat losses via boiler flue gas • Simple Cycle Gas Turbine– about 40% efficiency • The heat loss is from the gas turbine exhaust • Combined Cycle – about 60% efficiency • Recover the heat from the gas turbine exhaust and run a Rankine cycle • Cogeneration – about 87% efficiency COGENERATION • What is the problem with cogeneration? • Reality Strikes • In order to get to 87% efficiency, the heating load has to closely match the thermal energy left over from the generation of electricity. • Utility electricity demand typically follows a nocturnal/diurnal sine pattern • Steam heating loads follow a summer/winter cycle • With industrial users, electrical and heating loads are typically more stable COGENERATION • What factors determine if cogeneration makes sense? • ECONOMICS! • Not just the economics of the cogeneration unit, but the impact on the entire facility. • Fuel cost • Electricity cost, including stand-by charges • Operational flexibility including turndown ability • Reliability impacts • Possibly the largest influence • If the cogeneration unit has an outage then this may (will?) bring the entire facility down.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility Incentives for Combined Heat and Power
    UTILITY INCENTIVES FOR COMBINED HEAT AND POWER U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Partnership October 2008 FOREWORD The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Partnership as a voluntary program that seeks to reduce the environmental impact of power generation by promoting the use of CHP. CHP is an efficient, clean, and reliable approach to generating power and thermal energy from a single fuel source. CHP can increase operational efficiency and decrease energy costs, while reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases that contribute to global climate change. The CHP Partnership works closely with energy users, the CHP industry, state and local governments, and other stakeholders to support the development of new CHP projects and promote their energy, environmental, and economic benefits. The CHP Partnership provides resources about CHP technologies, incentives, emissions profiles, and other information on its Web site at <www.epa.gov/chp>. i CONTENTS About This Report........................................................................................................................... 1 Utility-Initiated Incentives, Policies, and Programs for CHP......................................................... 5 Investor-Owned Gas Utilities ..................................................................................................... 5 Investor-Owned Electric Utilities ...............................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical Balance of Plant Solutions for Power Generation
    GE Grid Solutions Electrical Balance of Plant Solutions for Power Generation g imagination at work Today’s Environment Todays power plants, whether heavy duty gas turbines, a distributed mobile “power plant on wheels”, or a remote wind farm, are becoming increasingly complex, especially when connecting different disparate systems seamlessly together. This is resulting in increasing industry challenges including: Demand Management Emergency Power Supplementing power to the grid for peak Support during natural disasters due to shaving or managing seasonal demands. unpredictable global weather patterns as well as support in politically volatile regions of the world. Constraint Management Regulatory Environment Overcoming generation constraints with Rapidly changing regulations, standards and impact increasing demand. on grid stability due to a variety of power generation sources on the grid. Back-up Power Power Quality Supporting maintenance, overhauls, or Managing changed network load profiles, larger outages at power plants. switched or dynamic loads, missing or overloaded interconnections. Rural Demand Energy Savings Population growth in large cities creating Reduce production cost through energy savings and increase in electrification of rural areas. increase process efficiency. With one of the largest installed base of turbine generators in the world, coupled with more than a century of experience delivering innovative, high voltage solutions in generation, transmission, and distribution networks, GE helps utilities solve these challenges with its versatile and robust suite of solutions for Electrical Balance of Plant (EBoP) applications offering best-in-class manufactured products with engineering and installation services. Providing a broad range of solutions to suit customer’s specific EBoP requirements, GE’s solutions are designed with scalability in mind to support a large scope of projects ranging from heavy duty turbine generation to hydro pump storage, renewable wind and solar applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Power Grid Modernization Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities
    Electric Power Grid Modernization Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities Michael I. Henderson, Damir Novosel, and Mariesa L. Crow November 2017. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States License. Background The traditional electric power grid connected large central generating stations through a high- voltage (HV) transmission system to a distribution system that directly fed customer demand. Generating stations consisted primarily of steam stations that used fossil fuels and hydro turbines that turned high inertia turbines to produce electricity. The transmission system grew from local and regional grids into a large interconnected network that was managed by coordinated operating and planning procedures. Peak demand and energy consumption grew at predictable rates, and technology evolved in a relatively well-defined operational and regulatory environment. Ove the last hundred years, there have been considerable technological advances for the bulk power grid. The power grid has been continually updated with new technologies including increased efficient and environmentally friendly generating sources higher voltage equipment power electronics in the form of HV direct current (HVdc) and flexible alternating current transmission systems (FACTS) advancements in computerized monitoring, protection, control, and grid management techniques for planning, real-time operations, and maintenance methods of demand response and energy-efficient load management. The rate of change in the electric power industry continues to accelerate annually. Drivers for Change Public policies, economics, and technological innovations are driving the rapid rate of change in the electric power system. The power system advances toward the goal of supplying reliable electricity from increasingly clean and inexpensive resources. The electrical power system has transitioned to the new two-way power flow system with a fast rate and continues to move forward (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Modernizing the U.S. Electrical Grid
    Transmission Innovation Symposium Modernizing the U.S. Electrical Grid Chen-Ching Liu Electricity Transmission Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State System Research University and Development: Emma M. Stewart Distribution Integrated Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory with Transmission Operations Prepared for the Transmission Reliability and Renewable Integration Program Advanced Grid R&D, Office of Electricity US Department of Energy April 2021 Electricity Transmission System Research and Development: Distribution Integrated with Transmission Operations Transmission Innovation Symposium: Modernizing the U.S. Electric Grid 2021 White Papers Prepared for the Office of Electricity U.S. Department of Energy Principal Authors Chen-Ching Liu Power and Energy Center Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Emma M. Stewart Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory April 2021 The work described in this study has been authored by authors at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, under a subcontract from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344 with the U.S. Department of Energy. Disclaimer This work was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Grid Energy Storage
    Grid Energy Storage U.S. Department of Energy December 2013 Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the members of the core team dedicated to developing this report on grid energy storage: Imre Gyuk (OE), Mark Johnson (ARPA-E), John Vetrano (Office of Science), Kevin Lynn (EERE), William Parks (OE), Rachna Handa (OE), Landis Kannberg (PNNL), Sean Hearne & Karen Waldrip (SNL), Ralph Braccio (Booz Allen Hamilton). Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 State of Energy Storage in US and Abroad .......................................................................................... 11 3.0 Grid Scale Energy Storage Applications .............................................................................................. 20 4.0 Summary of Key Barriers ..................................................................................................................... 30 5.0Energy Storage Strategic Goals .......................................................................................................... 32 6.0 Implementation of its Goals ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Energy Storage: Grid and Transportation Services Workshop
    02 Hydrogen Energy Storage: Grid and Transportation Services February 2015 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy EfficiencyWorkshop Structure and Renewable / 1 Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Hydrogen Energy Storage: Grid and Transportation Services February 2015 Hydrogen Energy Storage: Grid and Transportation Services Proceedings of an Expert Workshop Convened by the U.S. Department of Energy and Industry Canada, Hosted by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the California Air Resources Board Sacramento, California, May 14 –15, 2014 M. Melaina and J. Eichman National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task No. HT12.2S10 Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-62518 February 2015 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 303-275-3000 www.nrel.gov NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Energy Storage for Grid Applications: Current Status and Emerging Trends
    energies Review Thermal Energy Storage for Grid Applications: Current Status and Emerging Trends Diana Enescu 1,2,* , Gianfranco Chicco 3 , Radu Porumb 2,4 and George Seritan 2,5 1 Electronics Telecommunications and Energy Department, University Valahia of Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania 2 Wing Computer Group srl, 077042 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected] (R.P.); [email protected] (G.S.) 3 Dipartimento Energia “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy; [email protected] 4 Power Engineering Systems Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania 5 Department of Measurements, Electrical Devices and Static Converters, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 December 2019; Accepted: 8 January 2020; Published: 10 January 2020 Abstract: Thermal energy systems (TES) contribute to the on-going process that leads to higher integration among different energy systems, with the aim of reaching a cleaner, more flexible and sustainable use of the energy resources. This paper reviews the current literature that refers to the development and exploitation of TES-based solutions in systems connected to the electrical grid. These solutions facilitate the energy system integration to get additional flexibility for energy management, enable better use of variable renewable energy sources (RES), and contribute to the modernisation of the energy system infrastructures, the enhancement of the grid operation practices that include energy shifting, and the provision of cost-effective grid services. This paper offers a complementary view with respect to other reviews that deal with energy storage technologies, materials for TES applications, TES for buildings, and contributions of electrical energy storage for grid applications.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Smart Grid Means to Americans
    ONE of SIX SMART GRID STAKEHOLDER BOOKS environmental groups consumer advocates utilities regulators technology providers policymakers WHAT THE SMART GRID MEANS TO AMERICANS. A smarter electrical grid can save us energy, protect consumers, safeguard our environment and ultimately save money for all Americans. prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy by Litos Strategic Communication under contract No. DE-AC26-04NT41817, Subtask 500.01.02 Your stake as a consumer advocate. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, work sponsored by an agency of the United or usefulness of any information apparatus, recommendation or favoring by the United States Government. Neither the United product, or process disclosed, or represents that States Government or any agency thereof, or States Government nor any agency thereof, its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Litos Strategic Communication. The views and nor Litos Strategic Communication, nor any of Reference herein to any specific commercial opinions of authors expressed herein do not their employees, make any warranty, express product, process, or service by trade name, necessarily state or reflect those of the United or implied, or assumes any legal liability or trademark, manufacturer or otherwise does not States Government or any agency thereof. 2 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. PREFACE The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is charged released in 2008 and available online under the Energy Independence and Security at www.smartgrid.gov, this publication is Act of 2007 (EISA 2007) with modernizing the one in a series of books designed to better nation’s electricity grid to improve its reliability acquaint discrete stakeholder groups with the and efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • State Efforts to Protect the Electric Grid
    Strong States, Strong Nation State Efforts to Protect the Electric Grid BY DANIEL SHEA April 2016 Overview There are growing threats to the nation’s critical infrastruc- states introduced legislation in 2015 that calls for greater ture and state legislatures have been working diligently to diversity in power sources—from expanding renewables address these issues through a variety of measures. Recent to supporting nuclear and fossil fuels. At the same time, events have highlighted weaknesses in the nation’s aging there has been a significant push to encourage and incor- electrical grid, sections of which originated more than a cen- porate microgrids into the electrical system. These stand- tury ago.1 Even as Superstorm Sandy and Hurricane Irene alone systems can operate independently and supply power continue to loom large in the collective memory, Hurricane to a specific area in the event of a broader disruption to Joaquin ushered in October 2015 by battering the Eastern the electric system. Some lawmakers are eager to promote seaboard with record levels of rain and 100-mph winds. The microgrids, given the economic impacts of widespread increased intensity of recent weather events is raising aware- power outages. It has been estimated that a single day ness about the physical threats to the grid. At the same time, without power in New York City would cost $1 billion.2 a growing array of cyberthreats to energy infrastructure have led experts to increasingly draw attention to the grid’s tech- Many states are also considering legislation in support of nological vulnerabilities. smart grid technology to not only increase energy system resilience, but also improve reliability and efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA Wind Task 24 Integration of Wind and Hydropower Systems Volume 1: Issues, Impacts, and Economics of Wind and Hydropower Integration
    IEA Wind Task 24 Final Report, Vol. 1 1 IEA Wind Task 24 Integration of Wind and Hydropower Systems Volume 1: Issues, Impacts, and Economics of Wind and Hydropower Integration Authors: Tom Acker, Northern Arizona University on behalf of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Wind and Hydropower Program Prepared for the International Energy Agency Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy 1617 Cole Boulevard Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Golden, Colorado 80401 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Technical Report NREL/TP-5000-50181 December 2011 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S.
    [Show full text]