Alzayid2021.Pdf (1.098Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alzayid2021.Pdf (1.098Mb) This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. ARABIC DISLOCATION Ali A. Alzayid A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY to Linguistics and English Language School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences UNIVERSITY of EDINBURGH 2020 Supervisors: Prof. Caroline Heycock & Prof. Peter Ackema Internal examiner: Prof. Bettelou Los University of Edinburgh External examiner: Dr. Dora Alexopoulou University of Cambridge Declaration I, Ali Alzayid, declare that this thesis has been composed solely by myself and that it has not been submitted, in whole or in part, in any previous application for a degree. Except where stated otherwise by reference or acknowledgement, the work presented is entirely mine. 1 Abbreviations 1 first person 2 second person 3 third person ACC accusative ATB across-the-board AgroP object agreement phrase A-position argument position A’-position non-argument position AA agreement affixes AB Aoun and Benmamoun AP articulatory-perceptual BAC bound anaphora condition CLLD clitic left dislocation CLLD I clitic left dislocation I CLLD II clitic left dislocation II CLRD clitic right dislocation CLRD I clitic right dislocation I CLRD II clitic right dislocation II CT contrastive topic CF contrastive focus CI conceptual-intentional C complementizer CL clitic CLD contrastive left dislocation CIP clitic phrase CD clitic doubling CP complementizer phrase CSC coordinate structure constraint dXP dislocated phrase 2 DP determiner phrase DS Dobrovie-Sorin DAT dative E ellipsis FUT future tense FF fronting focus F focus F feminine GLD German left dislocation GM Guilliot and Malkawi GEN genitive HTLD hanging topic left dislocation IO indirect object IP inflectional phrase IND indefinite INF infinitive IS information structure JA Jordanian Arabic LF logical form LD left dislocation LCA linear correspondence axiom LA Lebanese Arabic LiA Libyan Arabic MOD mood MSA modern standard Arabic MADA move and delete approach M masculine MG modern Greek NOM nominative NEG negative marker NP noun phrase OVS object-verb-subject OSV object-subject-verb OBJ object PG parasitic gap PST past tense PP prepositional phrase 3 PRT particle PL plural PA pronominal affixes PERF perfect PAST past tense PF phonetic form P phrase Q question marker QP quantifier phrase QUD question under discussion RP resumptive pronoun SVO subject-verb-object SPEC specifier TP tense phrase TOP topic VP verb phrase T-role theta-role WCO weak crossover 4 Contents 1 Introduction 11 1.1 Three questions............................ 11 1.2 The language under investigation.................. 12 1.3 Outline................................. 12 2 Dislocation and Clitic Resumption in MSA : A New Taxonomy 15 2.1 Introduction.............................. 15 2.2 Word order and Information Structure . 16 2.3 Left Dislocation ............................ 21 2.3.1 Hanging Topic vs. Clitic Left Dislocation . 23 2.3.2 The current status of Arabic: CLLD vs. HTLD . 28 2.3.2.1 Aoun and Benmamaoun 1998 . 28 2.4 Right Dislocation ........................... 31 2.4.1 Clitic Right Dislocation ................... 31 2.4.2 CLRD in Arabic ........................ 33 2.5 Clitic Configurations in Arabic: a new taxonomy . 36 2.5.1 Terminological note ..................... 37 2.5.2 Justifying the taxonomy ................... 38 2.5.2.1 The left periphery: CLLD I vs. CLLD II . 38 2.5.2.2 The Right periphery: CLRD I vs. CLRD II . 43 2.5.3 Cinque’s (1990): the question of crosslinguistic validity . 45 2.5.4 The proposal ......................... 53 2.5.4.1 A note on connectivity effects . 54 2.5.5 What about islands? ..................... 57 2.6 Conclusion ............................... 59 3 Dislocation and Information Structure 61 3.1 Introduction .............................. 61 3.2 The information-structural characterization of left dXPs . 62 5 3.2.1 Aboutness........................... 63 3.2.2 Familiarity/Givenness.................... 66 3.2.3 Referentiality ......................... 68 3.3 CLLD I and CLRD I in MSA : the proposal . 70 3.3.1 Question Under Discussion (QUD) . 70 3.3.2 Contrastive topics ...................... 72 3.3.2.1 CLLD I in MSA . 73 3.3.3 Focus constructions ...................... 75 3.3.3.1 Information Focus vs. Contrastive Focus . 77 3.3.3.2 CLRD I in MSA: Contrastive Focus . 78 3.4 Atypical topics in the left periphery: necessary detour . 83 3.4.1 How other languages license atypical topics . 84 3.4.1.1 Romanian ...................... 85 3.4.1.2 Italian ........................ 88 3.4.1.3 Greek ........................ 91 3.4.1.4 Interim conclusion . 93 3.4.2 Contrast and atypical topics in MSA: the proposal . 93 3.5 Conclusion ............................... 99 4 It is a Single Clause! – The Monoclausal Analysis 100 4.1 Introduction .............................. 100 4.2 Clitic Left Dislocation (CLLD I) . 103 4.2.1 Demirdache (1991, 1997): CLLD is derived by LF move- ment of the clitic . 103 4.2.1.1 Discussion . 106 4.2.2 Cinque (1990): CLLD I is derived by Binding Chain . 114 4.2.2.1 Discussion . 117 4.2.2.2 Iatridou (1995): Cinque’s paradox . 122 4.3 CLLD I in Arabic . 126 4.3.1 Ouhalla (1997): CLLD I is derived by base-generation . 126 4.3.1.1 Discussion . 127 4.3.2 Aoun and Benmamoun (1998): two types of CLLD I . 129 4.3.2.1 Discussion . 131 4.4 Clitic Right Dislocation (CLRD) . 138 4.4.1 Kayne (1994): Right Dislocation as LF movement . 138 4.4.1.1 Discussion . 141 4.4.2 TP-external approaches to right dislocation . 145 4.4.2.1 Right dislocation is derived by movement . 146 6 4.4.2.2 Right dislocation is derived by base-generation 148 4.4.3 Monoclausal approaches to right dislocation: reevaluation 149 4.4.3.1 Base-generation analysis . 149 4.4.3.2 Movement analysis . 153 4.4.3.3 Right dislocation: remnant movement . 154 4.5 Residual issues: templatic approach to the left periphery . 157 4.5.1 Rizzi’s (1997) Split CP: cascade of projections in the left periphery . 158 4.5.2 Shlonsky (2000): Split-CP in Arabic . 159 4.5.3 Problems for the Cartography program . 160 4.6 Taking stock .............................. 164 5 It is a Double Clause indeed ! – The Biclausal Analysis 167 5.1 Introduction .............................. 167 5.2 Dislocation as clausal ellipsis . 168 5.2.1 Fragments: a type of clausal ellipsis . 171 5.2.2 Fragments in MSA . 175 5.2.3 Specifying Coordination . 178 5.3 CLLD I and CLRD I in MSA: a biclausal analysis . 181 5.3.1 Deriving movement properties . 181 5.3.1.1 T and case properties . 181 5.3.1.2 Reconstruction data . 182 5.3.1.3 Island sensitivity: loose ends . 183 5.3.2 Deriving base-generation properties . 184 5.3.2.1 A c-command glitch . 184 5.3.2.2 Weak Crossover (WCO) & Parasitic Gaps (PGs) 186 5.4 The dXP and clitic are not derivationally related . 188 5.4.1 CLLD I and CLRD I in MSA as doubling phenomena . 188 5.4.1.1 CLLD I and CLRD I are not agreement . 189 5.4.1.2 CLLD I and CLRD I are not Clitic Doubling . 196 5.4.2 CLLD I and CLRD I are not resumption . 201 5.5 Conclusion ............................... 203 6 The Elliptical Analysis: Miscellaneous Issues 205 6.1 Introduction .............................. 205 6.2 Ellipsis and information structure . 205 6.3 A (very short) note on the prosody of dislocation . 208 6.4 Ellipsis and movement . 210 7 6.4.1 What licenses ellipsis..................... 210 6.4.2 Movement And Deletion Approach: MADA . 213 6.4.2.1 Problems for MADA . 213 6.4.3 Evidence for MADA..................... 216 6.4.3.1 Preposition Stranding . 216 6.4.3.2 Islands ....................... 220 6.4.4 The interplay between islands and dislocation . 224 6.4.4.1 Ott and De Vries (2016), De Vries (2013) . 225 6.4.4.2 Arabic dislocation and locality: the proposal . 227 6.4.5 Ellipsis is a phonological phenomenon . 233 6.5 Conclusion .............................. 234 7 Conclusion 235 Bibliography 237 8 Abstract and lay summary This thesis considers three intertwined research questions that are relevant to the phenomenology of dislocation in Modern Standard Arabic, henceforth MSA. The first of these research questions concerns the possible types of dis- location constructions. The second question concerns the interpretation of dis- location constructions. The last question takes on the syntactic make-up of dislocation constructions. As far as the first question is concerned, I argue that left-peripheral ele- ments in MSA are not uniform and thus they are best analyzed as comprising two different types: Clitic Left Dislocation I and Clitic Left Dislocation II. I further argue that the same constructions which appear in the left periphery have a presence in the right periphery, namely Clitic Right Dislocation I and Clitic Right Dislocation II. I further show that the determining factor underly- ing the partitioning of clitic resumption in MSA is morphological case (mis)- matching. Concerning the second question, I maintain that the interpretation of dislocation constructions in MSA is rooted in contrastiveness: the idea that the dislocated elements are drawn from a contrast set in the discourse.
Recommended publications
  • Mandative Subjunctive in Arabic Syntax: a Minimalist Study
    البلقاء للبحوث Al-Balqa Journal for Research and Studies والدراسات Volume 16 Issue 1 Article 6 2013 Mandative Subjunctive in Arabic Syntax: A Minimalist Study Atef Jalabneh King Khalid University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/albalqa Recommended Citation Jalabneh, Atef (2013) "Mandative Subjunctive in Arabic Syntax: A Minimalist Study," Al-Balqa Journal for .Vol. 16 : Iss. 1 , Article 6 :البلقاء للبحوث والدراسات Research and Studies Available at: https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/albalqa/vol16/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Arab Journals Platform. It has been accepted for by an authorized editor. The journal البلقاء للبحوث والدراسات inclusion in Al-Balqa Journal for Research and Studies is hosted on Digital Commons, an Elsevier platform. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Mandative Subjunctive in Arabic Syntax: A Minimalist Study Dr. Atef Jalabneh Faculty of Languages and Translation-King Khalid University Abha- Saudi Arabia Abstract An Arabic sentence is dealt with in this article as SVO at spell-out and VSO at the logical form (LF). Thus, the objective of this study is to check the grammaticality of the mandative subjunctive structure in the absence of a case assignor for the nominative case. It also checks the relevant syntactic and semantic formal and informal features that support the grammaticality of mandative subjunctive at LF. To achieve the objectives, the researcher refers to Chomsky’ s (1981, 1986a, 1986b and 1995) Minimalist Views and Radford’s (1988) Empty Tense Theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Syntactic Category: Noun Phrase
    A CODING SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING STUDENTS' PRODUCTIVE ENGLISH Gerald P. Berent, Ph.D. Department of Research Paula M. Brown, Ph.D. Chairperson, Department of Speech and Language Brenda H. Whitehead, M.A., CCC-SP Department of Speech and Language National Technical Institute for the Deaf Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York, U.S.A. Copyright © 2002 Rochester Institute of Technology, All Rights Reserved G. P. Berent, P. M. Brown, & B. H. Whitehead 2 CODING SYSTEM CATEGORIES PRODUCTION TYPE SYNTACTIC CATEGORY: COMPLEMENTIZER PHRASE INFLECTIONAL PHRASE VERB PHRASE DETERMINER PHRASE NOUN PHRASE ADJECTIVE PHRASE QUANTIFIER PHRASE PREPOSITIONAL PHRASE CONJUNCTION GRAMMATICAL RELATIONS MORPHOLOGICAL PROPERTIES SENTENCE AND VERB TYPES SEMANTIC RELATIONS INFORMATION STRUCTURE DISCOURSE PROCESSES: ORGANIZATION COHESION PERSPECTIVE RHETORICAL DEVICES MECHANICS AND PUNCTUATION Copyright © 2002 Rochester Institute of Technology, All Rights Reserved G. P. Berent, P. M. Brown, & B. H. Whitehead 3 PRODUCTION TYPE Symbol Description Form/Structure/Explanation S(UCC) Success Successful production E Error Unsuccessful production A Addition Superfluous addition O Omission Erroneous omission REP Repair Repaired production REV Revision Revised production AMB Ambiguous Ambiguous formation VAG Vague Vague expression FRAG Fragment Sentence fragment UGR Ungrammatical Ungrammatical formation U Utterance Turn taken (spoken/signed) or sentence (written) W Word Lexical item PHR Phrase Syntactic phrase CLS Clause Finite or nonfinite clause WO Word order Order of words in a sentence INV Inversion Inversion of two constituents WC Word choice Appropriate lexical item MOR Morphology Morphological form STX Syntax Syntactic structure SEM Semantics Word meaning or sentence interpretation DISC Discourse Discourse function Copyright © 2002 Rochester Institute of Technology, All Rights Reserved G.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Transformational Grammar
    Introduction to Transformational Grammar Kyle Johnson University of Massachusetts at Amherst Fall 2004 Contents Preface iii 1 The Subject Matter 1 1.1 Linguisticsaslearningtheory . 1 1.2 The evidential basis of syntactic theory . 7 2 Phrase Structure 15 2.1 SubstitutionClasses............................. 16 2.2 Phrases .................................... 20 2.3 Xphrases................................... 29 2.4 ArgumentsandModifiers ......................... 41 3 Positioning Arguments 57 3.1 Expletives and the Extended Projection Principle . ..... 58 3.2 Case Theory and ordering complements . 61 3.3 Small Clauses and the Derived Subjects Hypothesis . ... 68 3.4 PROandControlInfinitives . .. .. .. .. .. .. 79 3.5 Evidence for Argument Movement from Quantifier Float . 83 3.6 Towards a typology of infinitive types . 92 3.7 Constraints on Argument Movement and the typology of verbs . 97 4 Verb Movement 105 4.1 The “Classic” Verb Movement account . 106 4.2 Head Movement’s role in “Verb Second” word order . 115 4.3 The Pollockian revolution: exploded IPs . 123 4.4 Features and covert movement . 136 5 Determiner Phrases and Noun Movement 149 5.1 TheDPHypothesis ............................. 151 5.2 NounMovement............................... 155 Contents 6 Complement Structure 179 6.1 Nouns and the θ-rolestheyassign .................... 180 6.2 Double Object constructions and Larsonian shells . 195 6.3 Complement structure and Object Shift . 207 7 Subjects and Complex Predicates 229 7.1 Gettingintotherightposition . 229 7.2 SubjectArguments ............................. 233 7.2.1 ArgumentStructure ........................ 235 7.2.2 The syntactic benefits of ν .................... 245 7.3 The relative positions of µP and νP: Evidence from ‘again’ . 246 7.4 The Minimal Link Condition and Romance causatives . 254 7.5 RemainingProblems ............................ 271 7.5.1 The main verb in English is too high .
    [Show full text]
  • Profeslonelt.Nsr.Us11th~.Nw 426-Sm
    EDUCATIOWAL. RA LROADS WINTER RPRORTS, PROPQSAjS. ORANTED LICENSES. AN UP-TO-DATE AmmUELANC3, 33 mAMN HOUs FLEET EVOLUTIONS Number of Retail Ones Issned Yea- WAaSamNOTON. BALTIMORE AND AMr.AnM ,. I. X Freedamen's Hospital Provides Itself on Oa PROMIL'I VATION 03'F Schedule in eeta. Directly 6=L 4 0- noGat LT FAL .TEPOTMAC. terday Afternoon. Of NOW ]= satbats Relator. W With a Muelk-Ieeded Aeeessary. I1ANO LOtW -M'WIAL ATfEITION PAi) Leave Washington fregs statics earner The Great Power o wi receiveSI- The excise board afternoon to beginners; papua taken rm iz years up. Jersey avenne and street. - £4-lUCHAS. ZVANS. utlNOON or BAT 6AY =H late yesterday The ambulance-service of Washington is . Iias for eixeSvA shaft for the Address W.tar ere. fe7t* For Chicage and Northwest, Vestinle4 D(VLG BBUNSWIK granted the following retail liquor licenses: to be increased on Monday or soon there- trains 31:5 a.. :00 s. wheel pits of the compa gs bouse at Great Maneuvers of the North For and Imnapb. Vbdi- Pactfie ave., above Now York, Atlantle it. falls, Said shaft will be- by eight feet in Projected T. F. Kinslow, 2155 Pennsylvania ave.; Cas- after by the ambulance of Fradmen's Cincinnai, St. Look cp3 n aB the year steam heat; rates, $, bitadmenion, t de ale F. buled Limited 3:0 p.m. espress 12:1 Night. an iiJW CHAS El KM titonty Verti Atlantio Naval M. Leahy, 1001 6th at. sw.; Ernest Hospital. This will answer emegency For Pittsburg and-Cevelad, dsm1 11:0 fLB $3Pa day.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Liste Totale Des Chansons
    40ú Comórtas Amhrán Eoraifíse 1995 Finale - Le samedi 13 mai 1995 à Dublin - Présenté par : Mary Kennedy Sama (Seule) 1 - Pologne par Justyna Steczkowska 15 points / 18e Auteur : Wojciech Waglewski / Compositeurs : Mateusz Pospiezalski, Wojciech Waglewski Dreamin' (Révant) 2 - Irlande par Eddie Friel 44 points / 14e Auteurs/Compositeurs : Richard Abott, Barry Woods Verliebt in dich (Amoureux de toi) 3 - Allemagne par Stone Und Stone 1 point / 23e Auteur/Compositeur : Cheyenne Stone Dvadeset i prvi vijek (Vingt-et-unième siècle) 4 - Bosnie-Herzégovine par Tavorin Popovic 14 points / 19e Auteurs/Compositeurs : Zlatan Fazlić, Sinan Alimanović Nocturne 5 - Norvège par Secret Garden 148 points / 1er Auteur : Petter Skavlan / Compositeur : Rolf Løvland Колыбельная для вулкана - Kolybelnaya dlya vulkana - (Berceuse pour un volcan) 6 - Russie par Philipp Kirkorov 17 points / 17e Auteur : Igor Bershadsky / Compositeur : Ilya Reznyk Núna (Maintenant) 7 - Islande par Bo Halldarsson 31 points / 15e Auteur : Jón Örn Marinósson / Compositeurs : Ed Welch, Björgvin Halldarsson Die welt dreht sich verkehrt (Le monde tourne sens dessus dessous) 8 - Autriche par Stella Jones 67 points / 13e Auteur/Compositeur : Micha Krausz Vuelve conmigo (Reviens vers moi) 9 - Espagne par Anabel Conde 119 points / 2e Auteur/Compositeur : José Maria Purón Sev ! (Aime !) 10 - Turquie par Arzu Ece 21 points / 16e Auteur : Zenep Talu Kursuncu / Compositeur : Melih Kibar Nostalgija (Nostalgie) 11 - Croatie par Magazin & Lidija Horvat 91 points / 6e Auteur : Vjekoslava Huljić
    [Show full text]
  • THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NOUN PHRASE and VERB PHRASE Japensarage [email protected]´
    Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES) Vol. 1, Issue 1-2, September 2014 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NOUN PHRASE AND VERB PHRASE JapenSarage [email protected]´ Ahmad Dahlan University Yogyakarta Abstract Among words classes or parts of speech a noun and a verb or precisely a noun phrase and a verb phrase play a very important role in syntax. In English, they mark the presence of sentence. The relationship between them is very close that one may cause the presence of another. This is often called a subject-predicate relationship and their degree is a bilateral dependency i.e. the verb phrase determines the noun phrase called valence and the noun phrase determines the verb through agreement (Bussman, 1996:1139). Other relationships among different phrases are one-sided or in the form of modifiers, subordinators, or complementizers, one is more important than others. This paper attempts to discuss a noun phrase and a verb phrase as the main part of a sentence. Some special characteristics of the noun phrase and the verb phrase are discussed. This paper also tries to see if other sentence elements such as an adjectival, adverbial, and prepositional phrases can have an emphasis in a sentence. Key words: phrase, complementizer, valence, agreement. A. Introduction. A traditional sentence analysis often involves the terms such as subject, predicate, object, complement, and adverbial. Such terms are said to be inconsistent because a noun can function as a subject, object, complement, or an adverbial. So does a verb, it can serve as a subject, object, and an adverbial. The terms representing a word class are now preferred.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Reo O Te Repo – the Voice of the Wetland Introduction 1
    TE REO O TE REPO THE VOICE OF THE WETLAND CONNECTIONS, UNDERSTANDINGS AND LEARNINGS FOR THE RESTORATION EDITED BY YVONNE TAURA CHERI VAN SCHRAVENDIJK-GOODMAN OF OUR WETLANDS AND BEVERLEY CLARKSON Te reo o te repo = The voice of the wetland: connections, understandings and learnings for the restoration of our wetlands / edited by Yvonne Taura, Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman, Beverley Clarkson. -- Hamilton, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research and Waikato Raupatu River Trust, 2017. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-478-34799-9 (electronic) ISBN 978-0-947525-03-3 (print) I. Taura, Y., ed. II. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. III. Waikato Raupatu River Trust. Published by Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Private Bag 3127, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand Waikato Raupatu River Trust PO Box 481, Hamilton 3204, New Zealand This handbook was funded mainly by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (contract C09X1002).The handbook is a collaborative project between the Waikato Raupatu River Trust and Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research. Editors: Yvonne Taura (Ngāti Hauā, Ngāti Tūwharetoa, Ngai Te Rangi, Ngāti Rangi, Ngāti Uenuku/Waikato Raupatu River Trust and Manaaki Whenua), Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (Te Atihaunui a Papārangi, Ngāti Apa, Ngāti Rangi), and Beverley Clarkson (Manaaki Whenua). Peer reviewers: Anne Austin (Manaaki Whenua), Kiriwai Mangan (Waikato Raupatu Lands Trust), and Monica Peters (people+science). Design and layout: Abby Davidson (NZ Landcare Trust) This work is copyright. The copying, adaptation, or issuing of this work to the public on a non-profit basis is welcomed. No other use of this work is permitted without the prior consent of the copyright holder(s).
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Study of Morphology
    A-PDF Merger DEMO : Purchase from www.A-PDF.com to remove the watermark An Introductionto the Studyof MorphologY Vit Bubenik fulltext research abstractsofall titles monthlyupdates LINC.OMwebshop 2003(2nd Printing) www.lrncom-eulopa.com' LINCOMEUROPA Publishedby LINCOMGmbH 2003 (2nd printing) 1stprinting: 1999 All correspondenceconcerning LINCOM Coursebooks in Linguisticsshould be addressedto: PREFACE LINCOMGmbH Freibadstr.3 Thrs introductorytextbook to the studyoflinguislic morphologyis basedon four prcvious D-81543Muenchen vcrsionsof a nranuscriptentitled An IntroductirlttIo thc Sntly oJ Nlorphologt'.They were publishedin a mimeographedform by Mcmorial University of Newlbundland(St. Johr's, Canada)in 1978,1982, 1986 and 1997,and were used at thc third-ycarlevel rn the Deparlment [email protected] of l,inguistics. http://home.t-online.de/home/LINCOM. E U ROpA Its currentversion is designedfor usc as a second-or third-yearuniversity level introductory www. lincom-europa.com textbookto lirrguisticmorphology. Bcfore taking this coursc.students should have previously introductorycourses to the whole disciplincof linguisticsat their first or webshop:lincom.at completedone or two sccondyear at the university. major tuming points in the recenthistory of morphology All rightsreserved, including the rightsof translationinto any Its argumcntationis built aroundthe foreignlanguage. No partof this bookmay be reproducedin any linkedwith Europeanand American scholars such as C. Ilockett, P. I{. Matthews,J. Bybee,W. way withoutthe permissionof the publisher. Dressler,A. Spencer',A. Carstairs-McCarthy,M. Aronoil and others.Its primary data are taken lrom representativeIndo-European (English, Gcnnan, Spanish, Latin, Greek, Russian, Sanskrit), Alro-Asiatic (Flebrew,Arabic, Berber)and sevcralother languages(Turkish, Chinese,Algonkian Printed inE.C. andothers). Printedon chlorine-freepaper The book consistsof ten chaptersexplicating fundamcntal principlcs of morphologyby mcansof (numbered)examples.
    [Show full text]
  • The Acquisition of Inflection: a Case Study Joseph Galasso California State University—Northridge
    The Acquisition of Inflection: A Case Study Joseph Galasso California State University—Northridge The study of syntactic development in children, for all intents and purposes, is reducible to a single minded inquiry into how the very young child (implicitly) knows to distinguish between lexical stems and functional affixes. Hence, the overriding question burning in the minds of most developmental linguists is morpho- phonological in nature. For instance, it would seem that the child must at least know (a priori) the stem before she can then engage in a dual-track process by which ambient separation of the morpho-phonological distinction attributive to past tense is carried out, say, between the paradigmatic representation of the English word play vs. play-ed /plei-d/ (a dual processing which provokes separation of the /play/-stem and the /d/-affix). Otherwise, it could be conceivable for the young child that the pair play-played would represent altogether two different lexical stems, and, stored as such, reflect two distinct though relatively similar semantic notions (a single processing): perhaps not unlike what we do find regarding derived words where an otherwise ‘two-morpheme’ analysis of [teach]-{er} is processed (tagged, stored and retrieved) as a ‘single-morpheme’ stem [teacher], similar to how the word [brother] is stored (see Clahsen et al. 2001). In this paper, we limit our discussion to exploring the developmental onset of inflection in child language acquisition and to seeing if such a maturational-based interpretation of the Dual Mechanism Model (DMM) is justified. We believe the findings provided in this study coincide with a maturational-based interpretation consistent with the Dual Mechanism Model, a processing model which seeks to distribute specific language processing tasks related to stem+affix separation to certain areas of the brain—inflection being just one such processing task.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum of English Grammar Glossary
    Glossary, Further Definitions and Abbreviations Accusative (See Case) Adjective/Phrase A word/category which often denotes states or well being (e.g., happy, sad), and which can often take an adverb suffix {-ly}(e.g., sad>sadly) or prefix {un-} (e.g., unhappy). Adjectives merge with and modify nouns to form adjective phrases (AdjP) (e.g, red shoes, sad boy, little news). Adverb/Phrase A word/category which often denotes manner (e.g., greatly, quickly, softly). Adverbs merge with and modify verbs to form adverb phrases (e.g., softly spoke, quickly ran). In English, most Adverbs end with the suffix {-ly}. Affix A grammatical morpheme which inflects onto a stem and cannot stand alone as an individual word. A Bound morpheme is a morpheme that must attach to a word stem. A Free morpheme, on the other hand, may stand alone as a free word (e.g., the word visit in re-visit is a free morpheme (and hence a word). The {re-} portion of the word is a prefix and thus bound. A prefix attaches at the beginning of the word, an infix to the middle, and a suffix attaches at the end. Agreement When the Person/Number features of a verb match that of its subject: a Verb-to-Subject relationship of grammatical features. For example, the verb like-s projects {s} due to its 3rd person/singular features matched to the subject John (e.g., John likes syntax). Anaphor An anaphor is an expression (e.g., himself) which cannot have independent reference, but which must take its reference from an antecedent (e.g., He hurt himself)— where himself refers back to He.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Merge' Over 'Move'
    Why Move? Preliminary Thoughts and Overview: <> How ‘Merge over Move’ informs Early Child Syntax Joseph Galasso [email protected] Incomplete Draft—December 17, 2012 Abstract, Preliminary Thoughts and Overview One of the leading questions burning in the minds of most developmental linguists is: To what extent do biological factors—such as a maturational brain— play a role in the early stages of syntactic development? This paper, pulled from chapter 2 of a monograph in preparation, summarizes the Chomskyan Minimalist Program framework regarding the theory of ‘Merge over Move’ and attempts to apply it to the earliest observable stages of English Child Syntax. In sum the conclusions reached in this paper suggest that early child syntax is structured in a flat (non-hierarchical manner) whereby (i) only sister-hood relations hold and (ii) that such a flat structure lexical projection would be what one would expect given the young child’s limited capacity to project only simple bricolage merge operations. As a result of a delimited flat structure, all forms of inflection (which are known ‘move’ operations which require higher functional projections)) should be absent in early child speech. Such a Non-INFLectional stage-1 is exactly what we find in the data below. But such prosaic structures are not exclusive to early child syntax alone. They too show up in adult target syntax. As an opener to subsequent discussion, consider the semantic vs. syntactic distinction in the following examples (to be expanded upon later in the sections): a. wine bottle > bottle of wine b. coffee cup > cup of coffee c.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches to the Structure of English Small Clauses Vivien Tomacsek
    Approaches to the Structure of English Small Clauses Vivien Tomacsek 1 Introduction1 The topic of small clauses did not become a target of much research until the 1980s — before that, predicative [NP XP] sequences occurring after main verbs were not really tackled by linguists. Within the Government and Binding framework, two main opposing ideas were formulated concerning small clauses, but there is disagreement from many aspects even among those working in the same theoretical framework. Small Clause theorists claim that the [NP XP] string in [V NP XP] constructions should be considered a single constituent; however, there has been no conclusion on the categorial status of small clauses. Various proposals have been made to solve the issue and provide a synthesised resolution to this problematic issue; however, none of them has been accepted entirely yet. The general aim of this paper is to demonstrate the complexity of the small clause construction analysed in frameworks which rely mostly on the Government and Binding and earlier frameworks, before the rise of Minimalism. The thesis attempts to represent both the theory that supports the existence of small clauses and the one that rejects it in chapter 2. This part will also argue for the acceptability of the clausal interpretation of the postverbal [NP XP] strings where the NP and the XP are in a subject-predicate relationship, and then chapter 3 will review the major proposals for the categorial status of small clauses, providing counterarguments for each. Finally, chapter 4 will summarise the most important points of the paper. 1I would like to acknowledge the expert guidance of my former Syntax lecturer, Krisztina Szécsényi, who encouraged and supported me to deal with Syntax in greater depth.
    [Show full text]