DOCSLIB.ORG

Seafood Industry Integration in All EU Member States with a Coastline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seafood Industry Integration in All EU Member States with a Coastline STUDY Requested by the PECH committee Seafood industry integration in all EU Member States with a coastline Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 629.176 - October 2018 EN RESEARCH FOR PECH COMMITTEE Seafood industry integration in all EU Member States with a coastline Abstract This study researched the drivers and mechanisms of both structural and non-structural horizontal and vertical integration in the seafood industry in all Member States with a coastline. The objective of the study was to identify trends among the Member States. The observed trends generally fall into three broad, inter-linked categories: regulatory environment, natural resources and firm performance. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Fisheries. AUTHORS Profundo: Ward Warmerdam, Barbara Kuepper, Jeroen Walstra, Mara Werkman, Milena Levicharova, Linnea Wikström MRAG: Daniel Skerrit, Laura Enthoven Robin Davies Consulting: Robin Davies Research managers: Priit Ojamaa, Carmen-Paz Martí Project and publication assistance: Adrienn Borka, Mariana Vaclacova, Marcus Breuer Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, European Parliament LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to updates on our work for the PECH Committee please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in October 2018, rev. edition December 2019 © European Union, 2019 This document is available on the internet in summary with option to download the full text at: http://bit.ly/2rzAZQh This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2018)629176 Further information on research for PECH by the Policy Department is available at: https://research4committees.blog/pech/ Follow us on Twitter: @PolicyPECH Please use the following reference to cite this study: Warmerdam, W, Kuepper, B, Walstra, J, Werkman, M, Levicharova, M, Wikström, L, Skerrit, D, Enthoven, L & Davies, R (2018), Research for PECH Committee – Seafood industry integration in all EU Member States with a coastline, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels. Please use the following reference for in-text citations: Warmerdam et al. (2018) DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. © Cover image used under licence from Shutterstock.com Seafood industry integration in all EU Member States with a coastline _________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 7 LIST OF TABLES 7 LIST OF FIGURES 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 1. METHODOLOGY 19 1.1. Definitions of integration 19 2. QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS 21 2.1. Data 21 2.2. Definitions of integration used in model 23 2.3. Empirical analysis 25 2.4. Results 25 3. BELGIUM 31 3.1. Composition of the Belgian seafood sector 31 3.2. Producer organisations 33 3.3. Company analysis 33 3.4. Integration 37 4. BULGARIA 39 4.1. Composition of the Bulgarian seafood sector 39 4.2. Producer organisations 41 4.3. Company analysis 42 4.4. Integration 46 5. CROATIA 49 5.1. Composition of the Croatian seafood sector 49 5.2. Producer organisations 50 5.3. Company analysis 51 5.4. Integration 53 6. CYPRUS 55 6.1. Composition of the Cypriot seafood sector 55 6.2. Producer organisations 57 6.3. Company analysis 57 6.4. Integration 58 3 Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies _________________________________________________________________ 7. DENMARK 61 7.1. Composition of the Danish seafood sector 61 7.2. Producer organisations 64 7.3. Company analysis 66 7.4. Integration 74 8. ESTONIA 77 8.1. Composition of the Estonian seafood sector 77 8.2. Producer organisations 79 8.3. Company analysis 80 8.4. Integration 92 9. FINLAND 95 9.1. Composition of Finnish seafood sector 95 9.2. Producer organisations 97 9.3. Company analysis 98 9.4. Integration 105 10. FRANCE 107 10.1. Composition of the French seafood sector 107 10.2. Producer organisations 109 10.3. Company analysis 110 10.4. Integration 115 11. GERMANY 117 11.1. Composition of the German seafood sector 117 11.2. Producer organisations 122 11.3. Company analysis 123 11.4. Integration 132 12. GREECE 137 12.1. Composition of the Greek seafood sector 137 12.2. Producer organisations 139 12.3. Company analysis 139 12.4. Integration 140 13. IRELAND 141 13.1. Composition of the Irish seafood sector 141 13.2. Producer organisations 144 13.3. Company analysis 146 13.4. Integration 149 4 Seafood industry integration in all EU Member States with a coastline _________________________________________________________________________ 14. ITALY 151 14.1. Composition of the Italian seafood sector 151 14.2. Producer organisations 154 14.3. Company analysis 156 14.4. Integration 162 15. LATVIA 165 15.1. Composition of the Latvian seafood sector 165 15.2. Producer organisations 167 15.3. Company analysis 167 15.4. Integration 173 16. LITHUANIA 175 16.1. Composition of the Lithuanian seafood sector 175 16.2. Producer organisations 176 16.3. Company analysis 177 16.4. Integration 183 17. MALTA 185 17.1. Composition of the Maltese seafood sector 185 17.2. Producer organisations 186 17.3. Company analysis 186 17.4. Integration 188 18. NETHERLANDS 189 18.1. Composition of the Dutch seafood sector 189 18.2. Producer organisations 191 18.3. Company analysis 192 18.4. Integration 201 19. POLAND 205 19.1. Composition of the Polish seafood sector 205 19.2. Producer organisations 207 19.3. Company analysis 208 19.4. Integration 214 20. PORTUGAL 215 20.1. Composition of Portuguese seafood sector 215 20.2. Producer organisations 217 20.3. Company analysis 218 20.4. Integration 223 5 Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies _________________________________________________________________ 21. ROMANIA 225 21.1. Composition of Romanian seafood sector 225 21.2. Producer organisations 227 21.3. Company analysis 227 21.4. Integration 229 22. SLOVENIA 231 22.1. Composition of the Slovenian seafood sector 231 22.2. Producer organisations 233 22.3. Company analysis 233 22.4. Integration 234 23. SPAIN 235 23.1. Composition of the Spanish seafood sector 235 23.2. Producer organisations 237 23.3. Company analysis 239 23.4. Integration 249 24. SWEDEN 251 24.1. Composition of the Swedish seafood sector 251 24.2. Producer organisations 253 24.3. Company analysis 254 24.4. Integration 259 25. UNITED KINGDOM 261 25.1. Composition of UK seafood sector 261 25.2. Producer organisations 264 25.3. Company analysis 265 25.4. Integration 276 26. CONCLUSION 279 26.1. Regulatory environment 282 26.2. Natural resources 284 26.3. Firm performance 286 26.4. Conclusion 286 27. RECOMMENDATIONS 289 REFERENCES 291 ANNEX 315 6 Seafood industry integration in all EU Member States with a coastline _________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CFP Common Fisheries Policy ITQ Individual Transferrable Quota PO Producer organisation TAC Total Allowable Catch LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Fleet economic performance data, STECF – Summary statistics 22 Table 2: Fishing fleet register, FFR – Summary statistics 23 Table 3: Integration indicators example 24 Table 4: Applied measures for the effect of integration by category 25 Table 5: Employment – parameters estimation 27 Table 6: Income – parameters estimation 28 Table 7: Vessel productivity – parameters estimation 29 Table 8: Sector productivity – parameters estimation 30 Table 9: Belgian seafood sector key figures 31 Table 10: Belgium and Luxembourg: Fish product retail composition 33 Table 11: Companies/families with more than one vessel 34 Table 12: Foreign ownership of Belgian fish catching companies 35 Table 13: Bulgarian seafood sector key figures 39 Table 14: Bulgaria: Fish product retail composition 41 Table 15: Croatian seafood sector key figures 49 Table 16: Croatia: Recognized producer organisations 50 Table 17: Cypriot seafood sector key figures 55 Table 18: Danish seafood sector key figures 62 Table 19: Denmark: Fish product retail composition 63 Table 20: Members of Danmarks Pelagiske Producentorganisation 64 Table 21: Members of Danmarks Fiskeriforening Producentorganisation 65 Table 22: Estonian seafood sector key figures 77 Table 23: Estonia: Recognized producer organisations 79 Table 24: Baltic trawl catch by company (tonnes) 81 Table 25: Baltic trawl catch by parent company (tonnes) 81 Table 26: Baltic coastal catch by company (tonnes) 90 Table 27: Finnish seafood sector key figures 95 Table 28: Finland: Fish product retail composition 97 7 Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies _________________________________________________________________ Table 29: French seafood sector key figures 107 Table 30: France: Fish product retail composition 109 Table 31: France: Recognized producer organisations 109 Table 32: German seafood sector key figures 118 Table 33: Domestic and foreign landings of the German fishery sector (2016) 120 Table 34: Germany: Fish product retail composition 122 Table 35: Germany: Recognized producer organisations 122 Table 36: DFFU high-seas fishing vessels, Germany 124 Table 37: Parlevliet & Van der Plas high-seas fishing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES and RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: a Guide for USAID Staff and Partners
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES AND RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: A Guide for USAID Staff and Partners June 2013 ABOUT THIS GUIDE GOAL This guide provides basic information on how to design programs to reform capture fisheries (also referred to as “wild” fisheries) and aquaculture sectors to ensure sound and effective development, environmental sustainability, economic profitability, and social responsibility. To achieve these objectives, this document focuses on ways to reduce the threats to biodiversity and ecosystem productivity through improved governance and more integrated planning and management practices. In the face of food insecurity, global climate change, and increasing population pressures, it is imperative that development programs help to maintain ecosystem resilience and the multiple goods and services that ecosystems provide. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem functions are central to maintaining ecosystem integrity, health, and productivity. The intent of the guide is not to suggest that fisheries and aquaculture are interchangeable: these sectors are unique although linked. The world cannot afford to neglect global fisheries and expect aquaculture to fill that void. Global food security will not be achievable without reversing the decline of fisheries, restoring fisheries productivity, and moving towards more environmentally friendly and responsible aquaculture. There is a need for reform in both fisheries and aquaculture to reduce their environmental and social impacts. USAID’s experience has shown that well-designed programs can reform capture fisheries management, reducing threats to biodiversity while leading to increased productivity, incomes, and livelihoods. Agency programs have focused on an ecosystem-based approach to management in conjunction with improved governance, secure tenure and access to resources, and the application of modern management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRY SECTION United States Fishery Products
    Validity date from COUNTRY United States 22/01/2021 00499 SECTION Fishery products Date of publication 28/07/2007 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 1000025102 GET SEAFOOD, INC. Winter Haven Florida PP 08/04/2013 1000025909 Fagan Alligator Products, Inc. Dade City Florida PP 1000084596 Sea-Trek Enterprises, Inc. East Greenwich Rhode Island PP O! 10/07/2008 1000112376 Pontchartrain Blue Crab Slidell Louisiana PP 14/04/2010 1000113172 Fishermen's Ice & Bait, Inc. Madeira Beach Florida PP 1000113708 Beck's Smokery Pompano Beach Florida PP 1000113902 Colorado Boxed Beef Co. Port Everglades Florida CS 16/11/2011 1000114005 D & D Seafood Corporation Marathon Florida PP 1000114027 BAMA SEA PRODUCTS St. Petersburg Florida PP 1000114048 Moon's Seafood Company W. Melbourne Florida PP O! 1000114049 Glanbia Performance Nutrition (Manufacturing), Inc., Florida Sunrise Florida PP 13/10/2017 Facility 1000114069 Placeres & Sons Seafood Hialeah Florida PP 1000114070 Webb's Seafood, Inc. Youngstown Florida PP 14/10/2009 1000114156 Cox's Wholesale Seafood, Inc. Tampa Florida PP 1000114170 Kings Seafood, Inc. Port Orange Florida PP 1 / 59 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 1000114326 Optimus, Inc. Dba Marky's Miami Florida PP 1000115645 AMERIQUAL FOODS LLC Evansville Indiana PP 06/02/2019 1000115810 Henriksen Fisheries, Inc Sister Bay Wisconsin PP 1000117125 RB Manufacturing LLC Salt Lake City Utah PP 08/01/2015 1000120312 Stauber Performance Ingredients, Inc. Florida New York PP 08/08/2019 1000120556 Plenus Group, Inc. Lowell Massachusetts PP 06/05/2008 1000120753 GARBO LOBSTER LLC Groton Connecticut PP 17/10/2016 1000121950 True World Foods, NY LLC Elizabeth New Jersey PP Aq 1000122358 Lamonica Fine Foods, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Efficiency of Lambari Production and Diet Assimilation Using Integrated Aquaculture with Benthic Species Aline M
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 23 August 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202108.0110.v2 Improving the efficiency of lambari production and diet assimilation using integrated aquaculture with benthic species Aline M. Marques1; Andre Z. Boaratti1; Dalton Belmudes1; Julia R. C. Ferreira1; Paulo V. L. Mantoan1; Patricia Moraes-Valenti1; Wagner C. Valenti1 1 Aquaculture Center and CNPq, UNESP—São Paulo State University, São Paulo 14884-900, Brazil; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract A single farmed fish species assimilates about 20% of the nutrients in the supplied diet. This study evaluated if the culture of complementary ecological- function species can recover nutrients dispersed into the water and transform them into high-valued biomass. A completely randomized experiment was designed with three treatments and four replications of each production system: monoculture of lambari (Astyanax lacustris); integrated aquaculture of lambari and Amazon river prawn (Macrobrachium amazonicum); and integrated aquaculture of lambari, Amazon river prawn, and curimbatá (Prochilodus lineatus). Fingerlings of lambari (0.8 ± 0.8 g) were stocked in twelve earthen- ponds (0.015 ha) at the density of 50 fish m-2. Eight ponds, were stocked with juveniles of Amazon river prawn (1.1 ± 0.2 g) at the density of 25 prawn m−2. Four of these eight ponds were stocked with curimbatá fingerlings (0.2 ± 0.1 g) at a density of 13 fish m-². Only lambari was fed twice a day with an extruded commercial diet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dutch Case
    The Dutch Case A Network of Marine Protected Areas The Dutch Case – A Network of Marine ProtectedEmilie Areas Hugenholtz Abbreviations BALANCE Baltic Sea Management: Nature Conservation and Sustainable Development of the Ecosystem through Spatial Planning BPA(s) Benthic Protection Areas CFP Common Fisheries Policy EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EC European Commission EU European Union HP Horse Power HELCOM Regional Sea Convention for the Baltic Area IBN 2015 The Integrated Management Plan for the North Sea 2015 ICES International Council for the Exploration of the Sea IMARES Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature Lundy MNR Lundy Marine Nature Reserve MESH (Development of a Framework for) Mapping European Seabed Habitats MPA(s) Marine Protected Area(s) NM Nautical Mile (1.852 km) NGO(s) Non-Governmental Organisation(s) OSPAR Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic RFMOs Regional Fisheries Management Organisations SACs Special Areas of Conservation under 92/43 Habitats Directive SCI Site of Community Importance SPAs Special Protected Area under 79/409 Birds Directive SSB Spawning Stock Biomass t Ton (1,000 kilo) TRAC Transboundary Resources Assessment Committee (USA/Canada) WWF World Wide Fund for Nature Cover Illustration (left) North Sea wave breakers in Cadzand, The Netherlands Cover Illustration (right) White-bellied monkfish (Lophius piscatorius) is a predominant species in the northern North Sea. Common along the entire Norwegian
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Bottom Trawl?
    What is a Bottom Trawl? Bottom trawls are a type of mobile fishing gear consisting of very large nets that are dragged on the seafloor to catch groundfish and other species. Bottom trawls are used in virtually all East Coast, West Coast and Alaska fisheries to catch shrimp and fish such as cod, flounder and rockfish. Trawls are used from shallow, inshore depths of 50-feet to extreme depths of 6,000-feet on the continental slope. The National Academy of Sciences found in its 2002 report, “Effects of Trawling and Dredging on Seafloor Habitats,” that U.S. trawlers have damaged over 230,000 square nautical miles of seafloor, an area greater than California. The most common type of bottom trawl in the United States is the otter trawl, in which the net is held open vertically by the force of water moving against two massive otter doors/boards. The trawl net can stretch 40-feet in height and spread over 200 feet wide between the doors, depending on factors such as the depth fished and the type of fish targeted. A large, fully-rigged net weighs well over a ton and requires a large, powerful boat to drag the net, particularly when loaded with a catch of hundreds or thousands of pounds of fish and bycatch (unwanted, non-target species) in the codend, or back of the net. The impact to the seafloor from trawling is a compound of the weight of the net and the forward momentum of the gear as it is dragged forward. The opening of a bottom trawl net is lined with floats on the headrope and with weighted ground gear on the footrope.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand's Shrimp Culture Growing
    Foreign Fishery Developments BURMA ':.. VIET­ ,' . .' NAM LAOS .............. Thailand's Shrimp ...... Culture Growing THAI LAND ,... ~samut Sangkhram :. ~amut Sakorn Pond cultivation ofblacktigerprawns, khlaarea. Songkhla's National Institute '. \ \ Bangkok........· Penaeus monodon, has brought sweep­ ofCoastal Aquaculture (NICA) has pro­ , ••~ Samut prokan ing economic change over the last2 years vided the technological foundation for the to the coastal areas of Songkhla and establishment of shrimp culture in this Nakhon Si Thammarat on the Malaysian area. Since 1982, NICA has operated a Peninsula (Fig. 1). Large, vertically inte­ large shrimp hatchery where wild brood grated aquaculture companies and small­ stock are reared on high-quality feeds in .... Gulf of () VIET­ scale rice farmers alike have invested optimum water temperature and salinity NAM heavily in the transformation of paddy conditions. The initial buyers ofNICA' s Thailand fields into semi-intensive ponds for shrimp postlarvae (pI) were small-scale Nakhon Si Thammarat shrimp raising. Theyhave alsodeveloped shrimp farmers surrounding Songkhla • Hua Sai Songkhla an impressive infrastructure ofelectrical Lake. .. Hot Yai and water supplies, feeder roads, shrimp Andaman hatcheries, shrimp nurseries, feed mills, Background Sea cold storage, and processing plants. Thailand's shrimp culture industry is Located within an hour's drive ofSong­ the fastest growing in Southeast Asia. In khla's new deep-waterport, the burgeon­ only 5 years, Thailand has outstripped its Figure 1.-Thailand and its major shrimp ing shrimp industry will have direct competitors to become the region's num­ culture area. access to international markets. Despite ber one producer. Thai shrimp harvests a price slump since May 1989, expansion in 1988 reached 55,000 metric tons (t), onall fronts-production, processingand a 320 percent increase over the 13,000 t marketing-continues at a feverish pace.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture for Food Security and Nutrition
    The Role of Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture for Food Security and Nutrition James Rohan CPA MBA WorldFish, FAO and World Resources Institute has conducted research recently which will support many of the questions suggested. Principles of sustainable business should be considered as the framework seeks to have minimal negative impact on the global or local environment, community, society, or economy,while achieving an industrious objective. Local environment will require an understanding of marine life and a model similar to planetary boundaries may promote education, research opportunities and continuous improvement principles. Many of the researchers have commented on the lack of research activity in this area and justifies the request by FSN for consideration. Rather than calories, I have proposed in the past a nutritional mass balance approach to recognise nutrition for health in food security. This would require consideration of yield and while some researchers have identified process capability, we should also explore product capability. Is nutrition compromised under stress or can it be enhanced with management? Over 90% of the world's living biomass is contained in the oceans, which cover 71% of the Earth's surface. At present, we harvest about 0.2% of marine production. ● Marine sources provide about 20% of the animal protein eaten by humans. Another 5% is provided indirectly via livestock fed with fish. ● 60% of fish consumption is by the developing world. ● The fishing enterprise employs some 200 million people worldwide. http://www.globalchange.umich.edu/globalchange2/current/lectures/fisheries/fisheries.html Data exists which suggests some fisheries are over and under exploited.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Modelling 321 (2016) 35–45
    Ecological Modelling 321 (2016) 35–45 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Modelling journa l homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolmodel Modelling the effects of fishing on the North Sea fish community size composition a,∗ b a Douglas C. Speirs , Simon P.R. Greenstreet , Michael R. Heath a Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XH, UK b Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB11 9DB, UK a r a t i b s c t l e i n f o r a c t Article history: Ecosystem-based management of the North Sea demersal fish community uses the large fish indicator Received 18 March 2015 (LFI), defined as the proportion by weight of fish caught in the International Bottom Trawl Survey (IBTS) Received in revised form 23 October 2015 exceeding a length of 40 cm. Current values of the LFI are ∼0.15, but the European Union (EU) Marine Accepted 27 October 2015 Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) requires a value of 0.3 be reached by 2020. An LFI calculated from an eight-species subset correlated closely with the full community LFI, thereby permitting an exploration Keywords: of the effects of various fishing scenarios on projected values of the LFI using an extension of a previously Length-structured population model published multi-species length-structured model that included these key species. The model replicated Multi-species model historical changes in biomass and size composition of individual species, and generated an LFI that was North Sea ∼ Fisheries significantly correlated with observations.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.9.2020 SWD(2020)
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.9.2020 SWD(2020) 206 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT REGIONAL SEA BASIN ANALYSES REGIONAL CHALLENGES IN ACHIEVING THE OBJECTIVES OF THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY – A SEA BASIN PERSPECTIVE TO GUIDE EMFF PROGRAMMING EN EN Contents INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Reducing the impacts of fishing on ecosystems ............................................................................. 7 1.1 Reducing fishing pressure ........................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Managing the landing obligation on board and on land............................................................. 8 1.3 Preserving ecosystems through environmental legislation ........................................................ 8 2 Providing conditions for an economically viable and competitive fishing sector and contributing to a fair standard of living for those who depend on fishing activities ................................................ 10 2.1 Addressing overcapacity ........................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Consolidating economic and social performance ..................................................................... 10 2.3 Estimation of the impact of COVID-19 crisis on the fisheries sector ........................................ 11 3 Improving enforcement and control
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Fish and the Fishery Industry in Wartime
    ADVANCE RELEASE ---- A D VA N C 3 RELEASE OFFICE OF WAR INFORMATION Thie Report on UNm isTArnS FISHERmS Is ADvmcE REmsE: For FRIDAY A3TERNOONPapers, September 3, 1943. The attY&Xd Yxdease iS a COmpr8henSiVe mpOrt prepared by the Office of Mar lnfomkion and designed to meet the various need8 of editors, writere, commentators, broadcasters, progzwn planners, photogre- phers, and gthers concerned with presenting the news* It may be re- produced in its entirety, excerpted, oondensed or used a8 baCk@Qmd and reference naaterial. * X-19961 FACTS ABOUT FISH FISH PROTEINS ARE COMPIETE--a meal of fish con- tains all the @xedients necessaxy to build body tissues. You don't have to supplelnsnt a platter of fish with other tissue-building foods. Ocean-caught fish also bring you minerals fmmthe sea--copper, ixon, calcium, phosphoxous, andothexs. SSXBILLZON POUNDSof fish and shellfish will be needed this year to supply our men 3n uniform, OUT Allies, and ouxselvs. This is a billion pounds more than we pro- , duced in oux biggest pxe-war yeas. You can help. Save canned sawn, sardines, and mckexel for Army and Navy use by: Canning ox salt-9ng fish at home; Eating uufazniliax varieties which may be available in your paxt of the countxy. HAVE YOU TRIED squid tith tcmato sauce? Steamed mussels? Skate wJ.th mayonnaise? Shark steak? Carp, buxbot, sheepshead? How about canning surplus fish, Just as you can surplus vegetables from your victoxy men? HERE'S A LIST of government publications on the cooking and home cama of fish: 'Xome Pxesexvatfon of Fishery Products" by Eorma~n 6 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaponics NOMA New Innovations for Sustainable Aquaculture in the Nordic Countries
    NORDIC INNOVATION PUBLICATION 2015:06 // MAY 2015 Aquaponics NOMA New Innovations for Sustainable Aquaculture in the Nordic Countries Aquaponics NOMA (Nordic Marine) New Innovations for Sustainable Aquaculture in the Nordic Countries Author(s): Siv Lene Gangenes Skar, Bioforsk Norway Helge Liltved, NIVA Norway Paul Rye Kledal, IGFF Denmark Rolf Høgberget, NIVA Norway Rannveig Björnsdottir, Matis Iceland Jan Morten Homme, Feedback Aquaculture ANS Norway Sveinbjörn Oddsson, Matorka Iceland Helge Paulsen, DTU-Aqua Denmark Asbjørn Drengstig, AqVisor AS Norway Nick Savidov, AARD, Canada Randi Seljåsen, Bioforsk Norway May 2015 Nordic Innovation publication 2015:06 Aquaponics NOMA (Nordic Marine) – New Innovations for Sustainable Aquaculture in the Nordic Countries Project 11090 Participants Siv Lene Gangenes Skar, Bioforsk/NIBIO Norway, [email protected] Helge Liltved, NIVA/UiA Norway, [email protected] Asbjørn Drengstig, AqVisor AS Norway, [email protected] Jan M. Homme, Feedback Aquaculture Norway, [email protected] Paul Rye Kledal, IGFF Denmark, [email protected] Helge Paulsen, DTU Aqua Denmark, [email protected] Rannveig Björnsdottir, Matis Iceland, [email protected] Sveinbjörn Oddsson, Matorka Iceland, [email protected] Nick Savidov, AARD Canada, [email protected] Key words: aquaponics, bioeconomy, recirculation, nutrients, mass balance, fish nutrition, trout, plant growth, lettuce, herbs, nitrogen, phosphorus, business design, system design, equipment, Nordic, aquaculture, horticulture, RAS. Abstract The main objective of AQUAPONICS NOMA (Nordic Marine) was to establish innovation networks on co-production of plants and fish (aquaponics), and thereby improve Nordic competitiveness in the marine & food sector. To achieve this, aquaponics production units were established in Iceland, Norway and Denmark, adapted to the local needs and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Business Review 2017
    Business Review 2017/ 1 Wrist Ship Supply wrist.com BUSINESS REVIEW 2017 Business Review 2017/ 2 EXPERT CARE Wrist Ship Supply is the world’s leading ship and offshore supplier of provisions and stores with a market share around 8%. Wrist offers a global 24/7 service, including handling of owners’ goods, shipping, air freight and related marine services that meet the demands of international organisations as well as local businesses. From offices around the globe, all Wrist staff take pride in making it easy for customers to receive their supplies – where and when requested – efficiently and at the best possible price. Our mission is to provide expert care - making our customers' life at sea better. VANCOUVER MONTREAL SEATTLE ∙ PORTLAND NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND LOS ANGELES / LONG BEACH SAVANNAH HOUSTON ∙ CORPUS CHRISTI JACKSONVILLE W Business Review 2017/ 3 WRIST SHIP SUPPLY REPRESENTATIVE OFFICES GARRETS INTERNATIONAL N PETERHEAD ∙ ABERDEEN GREAT YARMOUTH AALBORG ∙ COPENHAGEN ∙ ESBJERG ∙ SKAGEN ROMFORD HAMBURG ROTTERDAM / DEN HELDER MARSEILLE ALGECIRAS PIRAEUS IZMIR LAS PALMAS SHANGHAI GUANGZHOU DUBAI MANILA E MALE SINGAPORE Business Review 2017/ 4 GROWING OUR BUSINESS – EVEN IN DIFFICULT TIMES The shipping and offshore industries both stores before delivery from shipyards to saw continued difficulties in 2017. Wrist the ship owners. The steady expansion and kept working with customers on enhancing improvement of our global infrastructure their profitability while maintaining the continued, including upgrading our ware- quality promised and optimising opera- housing facilities, increasing our capacity tional efficiency. At the same time, the and enhancing our operating processes. steady expansion of Wrist’s global business platform continued.
    [Show full text]