UNIVERSITY SENATE Sixth Meeting, Monday, 20 March 2017, 2:30 P.M. Stewart Center, Room 302
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY SENATE Sixth Meeting, Monday, 20 March 2017, 2:30 p.m. Stewart Center, Room 302 AGENDA 1. Call to order Professor David A. Sanders 2. Approval of Minutes of 20 February 2017 3. Acceptance of Agenda 4. Remarks of the Senate Chair Professor David A. Sanders 5. Remarks of the President President Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. 6. Question Time 7. Résumé of Items Under Consideration For Information by Various Standing Committees Professor Gerald E. Shively 8. Senate Document 16-06 Nominees for Senate Vice-Chair For Action Professor Michael A. Hill 9. Senate Document 16-10 Nominating & Steering Committee For Action Nominees Professor Natalie Carroll 10. Senate Document 16-13 Faculty Committee Nominees For Action Professor Natalie Carroll 11. Senate Document 16-14 Senate Standing Committee Nominees For Action Professor Natalie Carroll 12. Senate Document 16-07 Student Affairs Committee Resolution in For Action Support of the Student-led Honor Pledge Professor Russell Jones 13. Senate Document 16-08 Changes to the Senate Bylaws for Term For Action Limits and Eligibility Professor Natalie Carroll 14. Senate Document 16-09 Absence from Campus Resolution For Discussion Professor Russell Jones 15. Senate Document 16-11 Resolution of Reaffirmation & Support For Discussion of Faculty Responsibility for Dual Credit Professor Ralph Kaufmann 16. Senate Document 16-16 Resolution on Mental Health Awareness For Discussion Professor Russell Jones 17. Presentation on Performance Review Standards for Faculty For Information Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs Peter Hollenbeck 18. New Business 19. Memorial Resolutions 20. Adjournment UNIVERSITY SENATE Sixth Meeting, Monday, 20 March 2017, 2:30 p.m. Stewart Center, Room 302 Present: President M. E. Daniels, Jr., D. A. Sanders (Chairperson of the Senate), J. W. Camp (Secretary of Faculties and Parliamentarian), P. M. Aaltonen, S. C. Chang Alexander, C. L. Ashendel, S. P. Beaudoin, A. M. Beck, B. Bhargava, G. Blaisdell, B. Blankenship, J. Stuart Bolton, S. S. Broyles, R. Cabot, N. Carroll, A. Ciftci, C. W. Clifton, E. Coda, M. R. Conaway, C. Cooky, R. A. Cosier, J. Cover, L. P. DeBoer, P. E. Dunn, D. S. Elliott, L. T. Esters, C. D. Fisher, A. M. Friedman, M. A. Hill, R. E. Jones, R. Kaufmann, C. M. Krousgrill, S. Landry, J. Ma, K. Matsuki, H. A. McNally, S. I. Mohammed, J. Mohler, N. Neumeister, D. L. Nichols, L. Nies, J. C. Niser, B. Nowack, L. Prokopy, A. J. Rodriguez, J. H. Rodriguez, A. Ruple, G. E. Shively, J. Sinfield, K. Sriramesh, J. A. Story, E. Strickland, J. M. Thom, F. Wang, L. Weldon, P. Wenthold, K. Williams, F. J. Dooley, B. Frazee, P. Hollenbeck, J. Huber, L. Mason, L. Parker, J. Ross, S. Johnson (Sergeant-at-Arms). Absent: R. Adams, B. J. Alge, K. D. Alter, J. Appenzell, J. Ann Banks, T. Bhattacharya, E. Blackwood, M. Boutin, K. Bross, C. E. Butzke, J. Cheng, G. Cheng, M. Ming Chiu, M. Comer, M. Corless, B. Craig, G. Denger, D. Dutta, D. M. Fekete, D. Ferullo, E. A. Fox, C. A. Hrycyna, G. S. Hundley, W. J. Hutzel, M. Ivantysynova, R. Johnson-Sheehan , Y. Kaakeh, T. Kelley, S. Liu, V. Lowell, R. Lucht, J. R. Mariga, C. Morales, R. Pasupathy , R. Pinal, V. Quinn, D. Ragland, C. S. Ross, S. M. Rotar, H. L. Servaty-Seib, T. Sizyuk, E. Slamovich, W. E. Sullivan, J. Watt, F. Yang, J. F. Yatcilla, A. K. Zeller, C. (Hanley) Archer, H. Beasley, M. B. Cline, T. Eakin, L. Kane, A. C. Rollock, K. L. Sermersheim. Guests: Valerie O’Brien (Marketing & Media), Chris Kulesza (PGSG), Spencer Deery (Public Affairs), Dave Bangert (J&C), Stan Jastrzebski (WBAA Radio), Jason Fish (ITAP-TLT), Cameron Mann (Human Pledge Student), Mateo Menchaca (Exponent), Brent Drake (OIRAE), Meghan Holden (J&C). 1. The meeting was called to order at 2:35 p.m. by Chairperson David Sanders. 2. The minutes of the 20 February 2017 Senate meeting were approved as distributed. 3. The Agenda was accepted as distributed. 4. Professor Sanders presented the remarks of the Chairperson (see Appendix A). 5. President Daniels presented the remarks of the President (see Appendix B). 6. Question Time- No written questions had been received and no Senators asked questions from the Senate floor. 7. Professor Gerald Shively, Chair of the Steering Committee, presented the Résumé of Items under Consideration (ROI) by various standing committees (see Appendix C). The Chairs or designees of the Senate standing committees briefly described the current activities of their respective committees. One of the issues under consideration by the Educational Policy Committee (EPC) is the functioning of the Academic Organization Committee (AOC) that reports to the EPC. The Chair of the AOC, Professor Craig Dobbins, recently sent a letter to the EPC emphasizing the important functions relative to changes that impact organizational changes on all the Purdue University campuses (see Appendix D). 8. Professor Michael Hill, Vice-Chair of the Senate Nominating Committee, introduced Senate Document 16-06, Nominees for Senate Vice-Chair, for Action. The nominees for the position of Vice-Chair of the Senate were Professor Natalie Carroll and Professor Ralph Kaufmann. A motion was made and seconded to approve the document. No additional nominations were made from the Senate floor. Professors Carroll and Kaufmann spoke briefly to the assembled Senators. The vote was taken and Professor Carroll was selected as the next Vice-Chair of Senate with a term beginning on 1 June 2017. 9. Professor Natalie Carroll, Chair of the Senate Nominating Committee, introduced Senate Document 16-10, Nominating & Steering Committee Nominees, for Action. Professor Linda Prokopy made a motion to postpone the vote as not all the biographical sketches had been obtained. Her motion was seconded and passed with 39 votes in favor of postponing the vote on this document until the April Senate meeting and 16 votes in opposition to this motion. The Nominating Committee will seek the additional biographical sketches from those individuals who had not submitted one, to date. 10. Professor Carroll introduced, for Action, Senate Document 16-13, Faculty Committee Nominees. A motion was made to approve the document by Professor Carroll. Her motion was seconded. The motion to approve the document passed by unanimous voice vote. 11. Professor Carroll introduced Senate Document 16-14, Senate Standing Committee Nominees, for Action. A motion to approve was made and seconded. A subsidiary motion made and seconded to amend the document to remove part C, the Faculty Affairs Committee nominees. Following the discussion of the pros and cons of removing this section, the vote was taken. The motion to approve the amendment to delay the vote on the Faculty Affairs Committee nominees passed with 35 votes in favor and 19 in opposition. The delay will allow the Nominating Committee to obtain additional nominees for the FAC, especially female nominees. Following the approval of the amendment, the main motion was approved with 52 votes in favor and 1 in opposition. 12. Senate Document 16-07, Student Affairs Committee Resolution in Support of the Student- led Honor Pledge, was presented, for Action, by Professor Russell Jones, Chair of the Student Affairs Committee (SAC), and Board of Trustees student member Cameron Mann. A motion to approve the document was made and seconded. Professor Kip Williams asked: “Is it a single pledge done once or on all exams?” Trustee Mann responded: “This would be done on all exams on the first page and all students would sign the pledge, but no words of the pledge have specified, at this time.” Professor Steve Beaudoin noted at other institutions, if a student violates the honor code, they are dismissed. He asked: “Would that occur with this pledge?” Trustee Mann said that would not occur. Currently, they are working with Associate Dean of Students Jeff Stefancic on this matter. Dean Stefancic directs the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities (OSRR). Procedures are already in place to handle incidents of academic dishonesty through the OSRR. Professor Cheryl Cooky mentioned that the current focus is on academic integrity and is a narrow focus. She asked: “Were there any discussions on broader issues?” Trustee Mann noted that the working committee of students hoped that the other, broader attributes would be included even if they were not specifically mentioned. Professor Hill asked how the paperwork for the pledges would be handled. Professor Jones stated that paperwork is kept in an academic file. Trustee Mann suggested that a two-sentence pledge would not take up much space or require much paperwork. Professor Mark Thom expressed concern that if he was encouraged to do this by the Dean would make him look hypocritical because there are no specific sanctions associated with violations of the pledge. The lack of sanctions or punishments for violations will make a professor look powerless or impotent. The inherent authority of the professor will be undermined. Trustee Mann said that the pledge does not eliminate any of the existing processes and procedures for handling cases through the OSRR. An honor code already exists that is utilized by the OSRR when dealing with cases involving academic integrity issues. This resolution would put the pledge in front of the students. Professor Laurel Weldon suggested that the point of the matter is that the students are doing something on their honor and that implementation and punishment are antithetical to the resolution. Trustee Mann agreed that the proposed pledge is not about the punishment aspect. Professor Williams mentioned the newest research on public commitment to principles is most likely to result in consistency when it is more pertinent and predictive. Anything more abstract becomes less predictive. Professor Christopher Clifton suggested that the pledge will be irrelevant for courses that do not utilize examinations for assessment of the students.