DOCSLIB.ORG

Bay Du Nord Development Project Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bay Du Nord Development Project Environmental Impact Statement Bay du Nord Development Project Environmental Impact Statement TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.0 Existing Human Environment ..........................................................................................7-1 7.1 Commercial Fisheries ......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.1 Fisheries Management Areas and Data Boundaries ......................................... 7-3 7.1.2 Information Sources ..........................................................................................7-3 7.1.3 Historical Domestic Fisheries ............................................................................7-4 7.1.4 Recent Domestic Fisheries ................................................................................7-6 7.1.4.1 Domestic Harvesting Locations ...................................................... 7-6 7.1.4.2 Domestic Harvest Composition and Values .................................... 7-8 7.1.4.3 Seasonality ................................................................................... 7-12 7.1.5 International Fisheries .....................................................................................7-18 7.1.6 Key Fisheries ...................................................................................................7-22 7.1.6.1 Groundfish .................................................................................... 7-22 7.1.6.2 Snow (Queen) Crab ...................................................................... 7-38 7.1.6.3 Shrimp ........................................................................................... 7-41 7.1.6.4 Swordfish, Tunas and Sharks ....................................................... 7-44 7.1.7 Fishing Gear ....................................................................................................7-47 7.1.8 Potential Future Commercial Fisheries ...........................................................7-48 7.1.9 Industry and DFO Research Surveys .............................................................. 7-51 7.1.9.1 DFO Multispecies Research Vessel Surveys ............................... 7-51 7.1.9.2 Industry - DFO Collaborative Post-Season Snow Crab Trap Survey ........................................................................................... 7-51 7.1.9.3 Other Collaborative Surveys ......................................................... 7-51 7.2 Other Ocean Uses ............................................................................................................ 7-54 7.2.1 Marine Research .............................................................................................7-54 7.2.2 Marine Shipping ...............................................................................................7-54 7.2.3 Marine Tourism ................................................................................................7-57 7.2.4 Marine Ferry Traffic .........................................................................................7-57 7.2.4.1 Intra-provincial Travel ................................................................... 7-57 7.2.4.2 Inter-provincial Travel ................................................................... 7-57 7.2.5 Small Craft Harbours .......................................................................................7-62 7.2.6 Other Offshore Oil and Gas Activity ................................................................7-62 7.2.7 Military Operations ...........................................................................................7-65 7.2.8 Other Marine Infrastructure .............................................................................7-65 7.3 Indigenous Peoples ........................................................................................................... 7-68 7.3.1 Key Information Sources .................................................................................7-71 7.3.2 Newfoundland and Labrador ...........................................................................7-71 7.3.3 The Mi’kmaq People of Eastern Canada ......................................................... 7-88 7.3.4 Mi’kmaq of Nova Scotia ...................................................................................7-89 7.3.5 Mi’kmaq of Prince Edward Island ..................................................................7-107 7.3.6 Indigenous Peoples of New Brunswick ......................................................... 7-110 7.3.6.1 Mi’gmaq of New Brunswick ......................................................... 7-110 7.3.6.2 Wolastoqiyik of New Brunswick .................................................. 7-121 7.3.6.3 Peskotomuhkati Nation (Passamaquoddy) ................................. 7-130 7.3.7 Mi’kmaq and Innu of Québec .........................................................................7-132 7.3.7.1 Mi’gmaq First Nations of Québec ................................................ 7-132 7.3.7.2 Innu First Nations of Québec ...................................................... 7-140 7.3.8 Harvested Species ........................................................................................7-146 7.3.8.1 Commercial-Communal Fisheries ............................................... 7-146 i Bay du Nord Development Project Environmental Impact Statement 7.3.8.2 Current Use of Land and Resources for Traditional Purposes ... 7-149 7.4 Other Aspects of the Human Environment ...................................................................... 7-153 7.4.1 Rural and Urban Setting ................................................................................7-153 7.4.2 Economy ........................................................................................................7-154 7.4.3 Human Health ................................................................................................7-155 7.4.4 Physical and Cultural Heritage ......................................................................7-157 7.5 References ...................................................................................................................... 7-158 7.5.1 Personal Communications .............................................................................7-158 7.5.2 Literature Cited ..............................................................................................7-158 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 7-1 Fisheries Management Areas and NAFO Fisheries Footprint ................................. 7-2 Figure 7-2 All Species Domestic Quantity of Harvest by Year, LSA 1986 to 2010 ................... 7-5 Figure 7-3 Groundfish vs Other Species, Domestic Quantity of Harvest by Year, LSA 1986 to 2010 ...........................................................................................................7-5 Figure 7-4 Domestic Commercial Harvesting Locations and Intensity, All Species, All Gear Types, All Months 2011 to 2016 .....................................................................7-7 Figure 7-5 Relative Quantity of Domestic Harvest by Unit Area, LSA 2011 to 2016 ................ 7-8 Figure 7-6 All Species Domestic Quantity of Harvest by Year, LSA and RSA 2011 to 2016 ......................................................................................................................7-11 Figure 7-7 All Species Domestic Value of Harvest by Year, LSA and RSA 2011 to 2016 ...... 7-11 Figure 7-8 All Species Domestic Quantity of Harvest by Month, LSA and RSA 2011 to 2016 ......................................................................................................................7-12 Figure 7-9 All Species Domestic Harvesting Locations and Intensity, January to April 2011 to 2016 .........................................................................................................7-13 Figure 7-10 All Species Domestic Harvesting Locations and Intensity, May to August 2011 to 2016 .........................................................................................................7-14 Figure 7-11 All Species Domestic Harvesting Locations and Intensity, September to December 2011 to 2016 ........................................................................................7-15 Figure 7-12 Fixed Gear Domestic Harvesting Locations and Intensity, by Quarter, 2011 to 2016 ..................................................................................................................7-16 Figure 7-13 Mobile Gear Domestic Harvesting Locations and Intensity, by Quarter, 2011 to 2016 ..................................................................................................................7-17 Figure 7-14 NAFO 3LM and RSA Domestic and Foreign Harvest by Year, 2007 to 2016 ....... 7-20 Figure 7-15 NRA Foreign and Domestic Fishing Effort Locations and Intensity 2008 to 2012 ......................................................................................................................7-23 Figure 7-16 Groundfish Domestic Harvesting Locations and Intensity, All Gear Types, 2011 to 2016 .........................................................................................................7-25 Figure 7-17 Groundfish Fixed Gear Domestic Harvesting Locations and Intensity, 2011 to 2016 ......................................................................................................................7-26 Figure 7-18 Groundfish Mobile Gear Domestic Harvesting Locations and Intensity, 2011 to 2016 ..................................................................................................................7-27
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2008 Agreement for the Recognition of The
    November 30, 2007 Agreement for the Recognition of the Qalipu Mi’kmaq Band FNI DOCUMENT 2007 NOVEMBER 30, 1 November 30, 2007 Table of Contents Parties and Preamble...................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1 Definitions....................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 General Provisions ......................................................................................... 7 Chapter 3 Band Recognition and Registration .............................................................. 13 Chapter 4 Eligibility and Enrolment ............................................................................... 14 Chapter 5 Federal Programs......................................................................................... 21 Chapter 6 Governance Structure and Leadership Selection ......................................... 21 Chapter 7 Applicable Indian Act Provisions................................................................... 23 Chapter 8 Litigation Settlement, Release and Indemnity............................................... 24 Chapter 9 Ratification.................................................................................................... 25 Chapter 10 Implementation ........................................................................................... 28 Signatures ..................................................................................................................... 30
    [Show full text]
  • The Siege of Fort Beauséjour by Chris M. Hand Notes
    1 The Siege of Fort Beauséjour by Chris M. Hand Notes Early Conflict in Nova Scotia 1604-1749. By the end of the 1600’s the area was decidedly French. 1713 Treaty of Utrecht After nearly 25 years of continuous war, France ceded Acadia to Britain. French and English disagreed over what actually made up Acadia. The British claimed all of Acadia, the current province of New Brunswick and parts of the current state of Maine. The French conceded Nova Scotia proper but refused to concede what is now New Brunswick and northern Maine, as well as modern Prince Edward Island and Cape Breton. They also chose to limit British ownership along the Chignecto Isthmus and also harboured ambitions to win back the peninsula and most of the Acadian settlers who, after 1713, became subjects of the British Crown. The defacto frontier lay along the Chignecto Isthmus which separates the Bay of Fundy from the Northumberland Strait on the north. Without the Isthmus and the river system to the west, France’s greatest colony along the St. Lawrence River would be completely cut off from November to April. Chignecto was the halfway house between Quebec and Louisbourg. 1721 Paul Mascarene, British governor of Nova Scotia, suggested that a small fort could be built on the neck with a garrison of 150 men. a) one atthe ridge of land at the Acadian town of Beaubassin (now Fort Lawrence) or b) one more west on the more prominent Beauséjour ridge. This never happened because British were busy fighting Mi’kmaq who were incited and abetted by the French.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quest for Lobster Stock Boundaries in the Canadian
    NOT TO BE CITED WITHOUT PRIOR REFERENCE TO THE AUTHOR(S) Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No. N615 NAFO SCR Doc. 82/IX/107 FOURTH ANNUAL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 1982 The Quest for Lobster Stoclg Boundaries in the Canadian Maritimes by A. Camp ell and R. K. Mohnl Invertebrates and Marine Plants Division Fisheries Research Branch, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Biological Station, St. Andrews, N. B., Canada EOG 2X0 P. O. Box 550, H lifax, N. S., Canada B3J 2S7 Abstract Historical and recent datO on lobsters (Homarus americanus) from the Canadian maritimes were examin4d for stock differences with the object of defining lobster population bot ndaries. Using pattern recognition techniques, historical lobster landings (1892-1981) from 32 areas resulted in grouping the landing trends into 7-8 areas. Examination of morphometrics data, landing trends, population parameters (growth and size at aturity), movement of tagged lobsters, and general surface currents that might indicate larval drift, suggested the following general lobster stock areas: Western maritimes which included the Bay of Fundy, inshore and possibly offshore) southwestner Nova Scotia (to Shelburne Co.), The Eastern Coast of Nova Scotia (Queens to Cape Breton Counties) which seems to be a transition zone f,r lobsters between the Gulf of Maine and the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and 3. Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence STOCK DISCRI INATION SYMPOSIUM Key words: Homarus americanus; lobsters; stocks; population dynamics; morphonietrics; landing statistics; electrophoresis; recruitment; tagging; movement. General Introduction Historically, there have been various debates amongst biologists, fishery managers, and fishermen as to the geographic discreteness of lobster (Homarus americanus) populations on the Atlantic Coast of North America (eg.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report October 23 and 24, 2019 Huntsman Fundy Discovery Aquarium St. Andrews, Nb
    ACFFA AQUACULTURE RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FORUM FINAL REPORT OCTOBER 23 AND 24, 2019 HUNTSMAN FUNDY DISCOVERY AQUARIUM ST. ANDREWS, NB ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2 INTRODUCTIONS 4 AGENDA 5 PRESENTATION SYNOPSES AND SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES 7 • Life Beyond the River: Applying Stable Isotopes to Identify the Primary Marine Feeding Grounds of Endangered Inner Bay of Fundy Atlantic Salmon 7 • Post Causeway Construction Era - Ecological Stewardship and Activism on The Petitcodiac River 8 • Assessing the Effects of Multiple Stressors on the Estuarine and Early Marine Survival of Atlantic Salmon Post-Smolts 9 • Salmon Farm – Lobster / Rock Crab Interactions in Southwest New Brunswick 10 • Potential Impacts of Elevated Temperatures and Hypoxia on Salmon Cultured in Atlantic Canada 12 • Escapes and Collapse - Mitigating risks using Remotely Operated Vehicles 13 • Containment Standards in US Aquaculture – Enforcement and Compliance 14 • The Containment Standards for Sustainable Operations in Norway 16 • Development of a Scottish Technical Standard for Scottish Finfish Aquaculture 17 • Why Adoption, Iteration, and Legislation of Containment Standards is a Key to Building Public Trust in Finfish Aquaculture 18 • Sustainable Development of North Atlantic Ocean Food Systems (esp AQUACULTURE) in the Anthropocene 20 • Sea Lice Vaccines: Chapter 30! 22 • Impact of Different Benzoylphenylureas Across Various Life Stages of Lepeophtheirus Salmonis 23 • Tracing the Development of The Warm Water Shower Technology to Manage Sea Lice Infections in Atlantic Salmon
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Frequency Analyses for New Brunswick Rivers Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2920
    Flood Frequency Analyses for New Brunswick Rivers Aucoin, F., D. Caissie, N. El-Jabi and N. Turkkan Department of Fisheries and Oceans Gulf Region Oceans and Science Branch Diadromous Fish Section P.O. Box 5030, Moncton, NB, E1C 9B6 2011 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2920 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts. Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715-924 were issued as Department of Fisheries and Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 925. Rapport technique canadien des sciences halieutiques et aquatiques Les rapports techniques contiennent des renseignements scientifiques et techniques qui constituent une contribution aux connaissances actuelles, mais qui ne sont pas normalement appropriés pour la publication dans un journal scientifique.
    [Show full text]
  • Striped Bass Morone Saxatilis
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Striped Bass Morone saxatilis in Canada Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence Population St. Lawrence Estuary Population Bay of Fundy Population SOUTHERN GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE POPULATION - THREATENED ST. LAWRENCE ESTUARY POPULATION - EXTIRPATED BAY OF FUNDY POPULATION - THREATENED 2004 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2004. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Striped Bass Morone saxatilis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 43 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm) Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Jean Robitaille for writing the status report on the Striped Bass Morone saxatilis prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Claude Renaud the COSEWIC Freshwater Fish Species Specialist Subcommittee Co-chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Ếgalement disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation de bar rayé (Morone saxatilis) au Canada. Cover illustration: Striped Bass — Drawing from Scott and Crossman, 1973. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2004 Catalogue No. CW69-14/421-2005E-PDF ISBN 0-662-39840-8 HTML: CW69-14/421-2005E-HTML 0-662-39841-6 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2004 Common name Striped Bass (Southern Gulf of St.
    [Show full text]
  • An Organization of the Scientific Investigation of the Indian Place«Nomenclatiire of the Maritime Provinces of Canada by W
    FROM THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA THIRD SERIES—1914 VOLUME vin An Organization of the Scientific Investigation of the Indian Place«nomenclatiire of the Maritime Provinces of Canada by W. F. GANONG. M.AHBb.E OTTAWA PRINTED FOR THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA 19 14 Transactions of The Royal Society of Canada SECTION II SERIES III DECEMBER 1914 VOL. VIII An Organization of the Scientific Investigation of the Indian Place- nomenclature of the Maritime Provinces of Canada, (Fourth Paper). By W. F. GANONG, M.A., Ph.D. (Read by Title May 27, 1914.) This paper is identical in aim and method with its three pre­ decessors, which were published in the immediately foregoing volumes of these Transactions. In a word, I am trying to apply the principles of scientific analysis to a very interesting subject especially prone to doubt and error. The comparative method which I use, explained in the introduction to the first paper, is proving wonderfully successful in solving the problems, as this paper will further illustrate. For convenience of reference I may add that the former papers made analysis of the names Oromocto, Magaguadavic, Upsalquitch, Manan, Nepisiguit, Kouchibouguac, Anagance, Wagan, Pokiok, Penniac, Bocabec, Pentagoet-Penobscot, Pohenegamook, and Cobs- cook, and used the roots thus made available in the analysis of a good many other words, both existent and extinct, of lesser importance. Of these extinct Indian names,—indigenous to the country, ap­ propriate to the places, and often reducible to a highly pleasing form, —the greater number may be revived to obvious advantage when additional place-names become needed in future; and I have tried to suggest simplified and softened forms for such purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report - Quebec Lower North Shore- Labrador Straits Regional Collaboration Workshop November 22, 2014 Quebec Lower North Shore-Labrador Straits Final Report Regional Development Workshop List of acronyms ATR: Association touristique régionale CEDEC: Community Economic Development and Employability Corporation CLD: Centre local de développement CRRF: Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation FFTNL: Fédération des francophones de Terre-Neuve et du Labrador LNS: Lower North Shore MNL: Municipalities Newfoundland and Labrador MUN: Memorial Univeristy of Newfoundland MRC: Municipalité Régionale de Comté NL: Newfoundland and Labrador OSSC: Organizational Support Services Co-operative QC: Québec QLNS-LS: Québec Lower North Shore-Labrador Straits RED Boards: Regional Economic Development Boards RDÉE TNL: Réseau de développement économique et d’employabilité de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador UQAR: Université du Québec à Rimouski Page 2 of 42 Quebec Lower North Shore-Labrador Straits Final Report Regional Development Workshop Executive summary The Quebec Lower North Shore-Labrador Straits regional development workshop took place on October 14-16 2014 in Blanc Sablon (Québec) and L’Anse-au-Clair (Newfoundland and Labrador). The objective of this 2-day workshop was to learn from other jurisdictions on cross-boundary collaboration challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned; to assess and identify the local and regional contexts and priorities; and finally to explore and identify potential strategies and actors for moving forward with collaboration
    [Show full text]
  • American Eel Anguilla Rostrata
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the American Eel Anguilla rostrata in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the American eel Anguilla rostrata in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 71 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge V. Tremblay, D.K. Cairns, F. Caron, J.M. Casselman, and N.E. Mandrak for writing the status report on the American eel Anguilla rostrata in Canada, overseen and edited by Robert Campbell, Co-chair (Freshwater Fishes) COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Species Specialist Subcommittee. Funding for this report was provided by Environment Canada. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur l’anguille d'Amérique (Anguilla rostrata) au Canada. Cover illustration: American eel — (Lesueur 1817). From Scott and Crossman (1973) by permission. ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2004 Catalogue No. CW69-14/458-2006E-PDF ISBN 0-662-43225-8 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – April 2006 Common name American eel Scientific name Anguilla rostrata Status Special Concern Reason for designation Indicators of the status of the total Canadian component of this species are not available.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description
    Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description Rio Tinto Fer et Titane WSP Canada Inc. Adress line 1 Adress line 2 Adress line 3 www.wspgroup.com WSP Canada Inc. 300-3450, boul. Gene-H.-Kruger Trois-Rivières (Qc) G9A 4M3 Tél. : 819 375-1292 www.wspgroup.com Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description Final Version Approved by: Numéro de projet : 111-20171-02 J U N E 2 01 4 3450, boulevard Gene-H.-Kruger, bureau 300 ~ Trois-Rivières (Québec) CANADA G9A 4M3 Tél. : 819 375-8550 ~ Téléc. : 819 375-1217 ~ www.wspgroup.com Reference to be cited: WSP. 2014. Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine. Summary of the Project Description. Report produced for Rio Tinto Fer et Titane. 25 p. SUMMARY 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Rio Tinto Fer et Titane inc. (hereinafter “RTFT”) has operated, since 1989, the Havre-Saint-Pierre mine, consisting of a hemo-ilmenite deposit, at its Lake Tio mining property, located 43 km north of Havre-Saint-Pierre (see Figure 1). However, the mine has been in operation since 1950. The most recent data from the mining plan provides for the site to be in operation beyond 2050. According to this plan, the total amount of waste rock which will be generated exceeds the storage capacity available under the current mining leases, which will be reached by the end of 2017. RTFT would therefore like to obtain new land lease agreements for the disposal of waste rock to be generated until the end of the mine’s life.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Applications for Membership in the Qalipu Mi'kmaq First Nation Band Important Information for Applicants July 2013
    IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS JULY 2013 REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN THE QALIPU MI’KMAQ FIRST NATION BAND Note: Applicants are advised that this document is not a substitute for the June 2013 Supplemental Agreement, the June 2013 Directive to the Enrolment Committee, or the 2008 Agreement. This Information Update is intended to provide general guidelines on what information applicants can start to gather to support their application for enrolment in the Qalipu Mi’kmaq First Nation. On July 4, 2013, Canada and the Federation of Newfoundland Indians (FNI) announced a Supplemental Agreement that clarifies the process for enrolment in the Qalipu Mi’kmaq First Nation and resolves issues that emerged in the implementation of the 2008 Agreement. All applications submitted between December 1, 2008, and November 30, 2012, except those previously rejected, will be reviewed to ensure that applicants meet the criteria for eligibility set out in the 2008 Agreement. This includes the applications of all those who have gained Indian status as members of the Qalipu Mi’kmaq First Nation. No new applications will be accepted. In November 2013, all applicants, except those Checklist previously rejected, will be sent a letter. Where an application is invalid, the letter will advise applicants that Ensure your address is up to date (Section A) their application is denied. Where an application is valid, Provide birth certificate, and proof of the letter will outline general documentation and request, by September 3, 2013 (Section B) informational requirements as well as where to send additional information applicants may wish to submit. It Understand Requirements to support is the sole responsibility of applicants to determine what self-identification (Section C) additional documentation they wish to submit in support Gather documents to support demonstration of their applications.
    [Show full text]
  • C S a S S C C S
    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2005/051 Document de recherche 2005/051 Not to be cited without Ne pas citer sans permission of the authors * autorisation des auteurs * A Comprehensive Framework for Un protocole d'évaluation des Assessing Changes in Fish Habitat changements de capacité de Productive Capacity Resulting From production de l'habitat du poisson Large Hydroelectric Projects lors de grands projets hydroélectriques Michel Bérubé, Richard Verdon, Gabriel Durocher, Jean-Christophe Guay Hydro-Québec Équipement Direction développement de projet et environnement 855 Sainte-Catherine est, 9ième étage Montréal, Québec H2L 4P5 * This series documents the scientific basis for the * La présente série documente les bases evaluation of fisheries resources in Canada. As scientifiques des évaluations des ressources such, it addresses the issues of the day in the halieutiques du Canada. Elle traite des time frames required and the documents it problèmes courants selon les échéanciers contains are not intended as definitive statements dictés. Les documents qu’elle contient ne on the subjects addressed but rather as progress doivent pas être considérés comme des énoncés reports on ongoing investigations. définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2005 © Sa majesté la Reine, Chef du Canada, 2005 ABSTRACT The Policy for the management of fish habitat and its No net Loss of habitat productive capacity by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) represents a challenge for the hydroelectric industry in general.
    [Show full text]