DOCSLIB.ORG

Designation of Critical Habitat for Consolea Corallicola

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Designation of Critical Habitat for Consolea Corallicola 3316 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 14 / Thursday, January 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR We request that you send comments Secretary may exclude an area from only by the methods described above. critical habitat if she determines that the Fish and Wildlife Service We will post all comments on http:// benefits of such exclusion outweigh the www.regulations.gov. This generally benefits of specifying such area as part 50 CFR Part 17 means that we will post any personal of the critical habitat, unless she information you provide us (see determines, based on the best scientific [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2014–0057: Information Requested below for more data available, that the failure to 4500030113] information). designate such area as critical habitat RIN 1018–AZ92 The coordinates, plot points, or both will result in the extinction of the from which the maps are generated are species. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife included in the administrative record We have prepared an economic and Plants; Designation of Critical for this critical habitat designation and analysis of the proposed designations of Habitat for Consolea corallicola are available at http://www.fws.gov/ critical habitat. We are preparing an (Florida Semaphore Cactus) and verobeach/, at http:// analysis of the economic impacts of the Harrisia aboriginum (Aboriginal www.regulations.gov at Docket No. proposed critical habitat designation Prickly-Apple) FWS–R4–ES–2014–0057, and at the and related factors. We hereby South Florida Ecological Services Office announce the availability of the draft AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). economic analysis and seek additional Interior. Any additional tools or supporting public review and comment. ACTION: Proposed rule. information that we may develop for We will seek peer review. We are this critical habitat designation will also seeking comments from independent SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and be available at the U.S. Fish and specialists to ensure that our critical Wildlife Service, propose to designate Wildlife Service Web site and Field habitat designation proposal is based on critical habitat for Consolea corallicola Office set out above, and may also be scientifically sound data and analyses. (Florida semaphore cactus) and Harrisia included in the preamble and/or at We have invited these peer reviewers to aboriginum (aboriginal prickly-apple) http://www.regulations.gov. comment on our specific assumptions under the Endangered Species Act (Act). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and conclusions in this critical habitat In total, approximately 4,411 acres proposal. Because we will consider all (1,785 hectares) for Consolea corallicola Acting Field Supervisor Roxanna Hinzman, U.S. Fish and Wildlife comments and information received in Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, during the comment period, our final Florida; and 3,444 acres (1,394 hectares) Service, South Florida Ecological Services Office, 1339 20th Street, Vero determinations may differ from this for Harrisia aboriginum in Manatee, proposal. Charlotte, Sarasota, and Lee Counties, Beach, FL 32960; by telephone 772– Florida, fall within the boundaries of 562–3909; or by facsimile 772–562– Information Requested the proposed critical habitat 4288. If you use a telecommunications We intend that any final action designations. We also announce the device for the deaf (TDD), call the resulting from this proposed rule will be availability of a draft economic analysis Federal Information Relay Service based on the best scientific and of the proposed designation for these (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. commercial data available and be as species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: accurate and as effective as possible. DATES: We will accept comments Executive Summary Therefore, we request comments or information from other concerned received or postmarked on or before Why we need to publish a rule. Under March 23, 2015. Comments submitted government agencies, the scientific the Endangered Species Act (Act), when community, industry, or any other electronically using the Federal we determine that any species is eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES interested party concerning this threatened or endangered, we must proposed rule. We particularly seek below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. designate critical habitat, to the Eastern Time on the closing date. We comments concerning: maximum extent prudent and (1) The reasons why we should or must receive requests for public determinable. Designations and should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical hearings, in writing, at the address revisions of critical habitat can only be habitat’’ under section 4 of the Act (16 shown in ADDRESSES by March 9, 2015. completed by issuing a rule. We listed U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) including whether ADDRESSES: You may submit comments Consolea corallicola (Florida semaphore there are threats to these species from by one of the following methods: cactus) and Harrisia aboriginum human activity, the degree of which can (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal (aboriginal prickly-apple) as endangered be expected to increase due to the eRulemaking Portal: http:// species under the Act on October 24, designation, and whether that increase www.regulations.gov. In the Keyword 2013 (78 FR 63795). in threat outweighs the benefit of box, enter FWS–R4–ES–2014–0057, What this rule contains. This rule designation such that the designation of which is the docket number for this consists of a proposed rule for critical habitat may not be prudent. rulemaking. Then, in the Search panel designation of critical habitat for two (2) Specific information on: on the left side of the screen, under the endangered plant species, Consolea (a) The amount and distribution of Document Type heading, click on the corallicola and Harrisia aboriginum. Consolea corallicola and Harrisia Proposed Rules link to locate this The basis for our action. Section aboriginum habitat, document. You may submit a comment 4(b)(2) of the Act states that the (b) What may constitute ‘‘physical or by clicking on ‘‘Comment Now!’’ Secretary shall designate critical habitat biological features essential to the (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail on the basis of the best available conservation of the species,’’ within the or hand-delivery to: Public Comments scientific data after taking into geographical range currently occupied Processing, Attn: FWS–R4–ES–2014– consideration the economic impact, by the species, 0057; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service national security impact, and any other (c) What areas, that were occupied at Headquarters, MS: BPHC, 5275 Leesburg relevant impact of specifying any the time of listing (or are currently Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–3803. particular area as critical habitat. The occupied) and that contain features VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:25 Jan 21, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22JAP2.SGM 22JAP2 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 14 / Thursday, January 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules 3317 essential to the conservation of the hard copy, we will post your entire berm, and buttonwood forests (Bradley species, should be included in the comment—including your personal and Gann 1999, p. 77; Gann et al. 2002, designation and why, identifying information—on http:// p. 480; Higgins 2007, pers. comm.). (d) Special management www.regulations.gov. You may request Consolea corallicola occurs on sandy considerations or protections that may at the top of your document that we soils and limestone rockland soils with be needed in the critical habitat areas withhold personal information such as little organic matter (Small 1930, pp. we are proposing, including managing your street address, phone number, or 25–26) and seems to prefer areas where for the potential effects of climate email address from public review; canopy cover and sun exposure are change, and however, we cannot guarantee that we moderate (Grahl and Bradley 2005, p. 4). (e) What areas not occupied at the will be able to do so. Detailed descriptions of these habitats time of listing are essential for the Comments and materials we receive, are presented in the proposed listing conservation of the species and why. as well as supporting documentation we rule for Chromolaena frustrata, (3) Land use designations and current used in preparing this proposed rule, Consolea corallicola, and Harrisia or planned activities in the subject areas will be available for public inspection aboriginum (October 11, 2012; 77 FR and their possible impacts on proposed on http://www.regulations.gov, or by 61836), with a revised description of critical habitat. appointment, during normal business buttonwood forests provided in the final (4) Information on the projected and hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife listing rule for these plants (October 24, reasonably likely impacts of climate Service, South Florida Ecological 2013; 78 FR 63796). change on Consolea corallicola and Services Office (see FOR FURTHER Harrisia aboriginum occurs on coastal Harrisia aboriginum and proposed INFORMATION CONTACT). berms, coastal strand, coastal grasslands critical habitat. and maritime hammocks, with a sand (5) Any probable economic, national Previous Federal Actions substrate. It also occurs on shell mounds security, or other relevant impacts of Previous Federal actions for Consolea with a calcareous shell substrate designating any area that may be corallicola and Harrisia aboriginum are (Bradley et al. 2004, pp. 4, 14). Detailed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taxonomy and Distribution of Opuntia and Related Plants
    Taxonomy and Distribution of Opuntia and Related Genera Raul Puente Desert Botanical Garden Donald Pinkava Arizona State University Subfamily Opuntioideae Ca. 350 spp. 13-18 genera Very wide distribution (Canada to Patagonia) Morphological consistency Glochids Bony arils Generic Boundaries Britton and Rose, 1919 Anderson, 2001 Hunt, 2006 -- Seven genera -- 15 genera --18 genera Austrocylindropuntia Austrocylindropuntia Grusonia Brasiliopuntia Brasiliopuntia Maihuenia Consolea Consolea Nopalea Cumulopuntia Cumulopuntia Opuntia Cylindropuntia Cylindropuntia Pereskiopsis Grusonia Grusonia Pterocactus Maihueniopsis Corynopuntia Tacinga Miqueliopuntia Micropuntia Opuntia Maihueniopsis Nopalea Miqueliopuntia Pereskiopsis Opuntia Pterocactus Nopalea Quiabentia Pereskiopsis Tacinga Pterocactus Tephrocactus Quiabentia Tunilla Tacinga Tephrocactus Tunilla Classification: Family: Cactaceae Subfamily: Maihuenioideae Pereskioideae Cactoideae Opuntioideae Wallace, 2002 Opuntia Griffith, P. 2002 Nopalea nrITS Consolea Tacinga Brasiliopuntia Tunilla Miqueliopuntia Cylindropuntia Grusonia Opuntioideae Grusonia pulchella Pereskiopsis Austrocylindropuntia Quiabentia 95 Cumulopuntia Tephrocactus Pterocactus Maihueniopsis Cactoideae Maihuenioideae Pereskia aculeata Pereskiodeae Pereskia grandiflora Talinum Portulacaceae Origin and Dispersal Andean Region (Wallace and Dickie, 2002) Cylindropuntia Cylindropuntia tesajo Cylindropuntia thurberi (Engelmann) F. M. Knuth Cylindropuntia cholla (Weber) F. M. Knuth Potential overlapping areas between the Opuntia
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys Terrestrial Adaptation Planning (Keystap) Species
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330842954 FLORIDA KEYS TERRESTRIAL ADAPTATION PROJECT: Florida Keys Case Study on Incorporating Climate Change Considerations into Conservation Planning and Actions for Threatened and Endang... Technical Report · January 2018 CITATION READS 1 438 6 authors, including: Logan Benedict Jason M. Evans Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Stetson University 2 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION 87 PUBLICATIONS 983 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Conservation Clinic View project Vinson Institute Policy Papers View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jason M. Evans on 27 April 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. USFWS Cooperative Agreement F16AC01213 Florida Keys Case Study on Incorporating Climate Change Considerations into Conservation Planning and Actions for Threatened and Endangered Species Project Coordinator: Logan Benedict, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Project Team: Bob Glazer, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Chris Bergh, The Nature Conservancy Steve Traxler, US Fish and Wildlife Service Beth Stys, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Jason Evans, Stetson University Project Report Photo by Logan Benedict Cover Photo by Ricardo Zambrano 1 | Page USFWS Cooperative Agreement F16AC01213 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State Parks Data by 2021 House District
    30, Florida State Parks FY 2019-20 Data by 2021 House Districts This compilation was produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation . FloridaStateParksFoundation.org Statewide Totals • 175 Florida State Parks and Trails (164 Parks / 11 Trails) comprising nearly 800,000 Acres • $2.2 billion direct impact to Florida’s economy • $150 million in sales tax revenue • 31,810 jobs supported • 25 million visitors served # of Economic Jobs Park House Districts Parks Impact Supported Visitors 1 Salzman, Michelle 0 2 Andrade, Robert Alexander “Alex” 3 31,073,188 436 349,462 Big Lagoon State Park 10,336,536 145 110,254 Perdido Key State Park 17,191,206 241 198,276 Tarklin Bayou Preserve State Park 3,545,446 50 40,932 3 Williamson, Jayer 3 26,651,285 416 362,492 Blackwater Heritage State Trail 18,971,114 266 218,287 Blackwater River State Park 7,101,563 99 78,680 Yellow River Marsh Preserve State Park 578,608 51 65,525 4 Maney, Thomas Patterson “Patt” 2 41,626,278 583 469,477 Fred Gannon Rocky Bayou State Park 7,558,966 106 83,636 Henderson Beach State Park 34,067,312 477 385,841 5 Drake, Brad 9 64,140,859 897 696,022 Camp Helen State Park 3,133,710 44 32,773 Deer Lake State Park 1,738,073 24 19,557 Eden Gardens State Park 3,235,182 45 36,128 Falling Waters State Park 5,510,029 77 58,866 Florida Caverns State Park 4,090,576 57 39,405 Grayton Beach State Park 17,072,108 239 186,686 Ponce de Leon Springs State Park 6,911,495 97 78,277 Three Rivers State Park 2,916,005 41 30,637 Topsail Hill Preserve State Park 19,533,681 273 213,693 6 Trumbull, Jay 2 45,103,015 632 504,860 Camp Helen State Park 3,133,710 44 32,773 St.
    [Show full text]
  • House Districts (This Compilation Was Produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation, January 2019)
    Florida State Parks FY 2017-18 Data by 2019 House Districts (This compilation was produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation, January 2019) . State Wide Totals • 175 Florida State Parks and Trails (164 Parks / 11 Trails) comprising nearly 800,000 Acres • $2.4 billion direct economic impact • $158 million in sales tax revenue • 33,587 jobs supported • Over 28 million visitors served # of Economic Jobs Park House Districts Parks Impact Supported Visitors 1 Hill, Walter Bryan “Mike” 0 2 Andre, Robert Alexander “Alex” 3 28,135,146 393 338,807 Big Lagoon State Park 12,155,746 170 141,517 Perdido Key State Park 12,739,427 178 157,126 Tarklin Bayou Preserve State Park 3,239,973 45 40,164 3 Williamson, Jayer 3 22,545,992 315 275,195 Blackwater Heritage State Trail 15,301,348 214 188,630 Blackwater River State Park 6,361,036 89 75,848 Yellow River Marsh Preserve State Park 883,608 12 10,717 4 Ponder, Mel 2 46,877,022 657 564,936 Fred Gannon Rocky Bayou State Park 7,896,093 111 88,633 Henderson Beach State Park 38,980,929 546 476,303 5 Drake, Brad 9 75,811,647 1062 881,589 Camp Helen State Park 2,778,378 39 31,704 Deer Lake State Park 1,654,544 23 19,939 Eden Gardens State Park 3,298,681 46 39,601 Falling Waters State Park 5,761,074 81 67,225 Florida Caverns State Park 12,217,659 171 135,677 Grayton Beach State Park 20,250,255 284 236,181 Ponce de Leon Springs State Park 4,745,495 66 57,194 Three Rivers State Park 3,465,975 49 39,482 Topsail Hill Preserve State Park 21,639,586 303 254,586 6 Trumbull, Jay 2 76,186,412 1,067 926,162 Camp Helen State Park 2,778,378 39 31,704 St.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Botanic Garden Strategy for Plant Conservation 2016-2020 Botanic Gardens Conservation International
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Reports Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences 1-1-2016 North American Botanic Garden Strategy for Plant Conservation 2016-2020 Botanic Gardens Conservation International American Public Gardens Association Asociacion Mexicana de Jardines Center for Plant Conservation Plant Conservation Alliance See next page for additional authors Find out more information about Nova Southeastern University and the Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography. Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facreports Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Authors Botanic Gardens Conservation International, American Public Gardens Association, Asociacion Mexicana de Jardines, Center for Plant Conservation, Plant Conservation Alliance, Pam Allenstein, Robert Bye, Jennifer Ceska, John Clark, Jenny Cruse-Sanders, Gerard Donnelly, Christopher Dunn, Anne Frances, David Galbraith, Jordan Golubov, Gennadyi Gurman, Kayri Havens, Abby Hird Meyer, Douglas Justice, Edelmira Linares, Maria Magdalena Hernandez, Beatriz Maruri Aguilar, Mike Maunder, Ray Mims, Greg Mueller, Jennifer Ramp Neale, Martin Nicholson, Ari Novy, Susan Pell, John J. Pipoly III, Diane Ragone, Peter Raven, Erin Riggs, Kate Sackman, Emiliano Sanchez Martinez, Suzanne Sharrock, Casey Sclar, Paul Smith, Murphy Westwood, Rebecca Wolf, and Peter Wyse Jackson North American Botanic Garden Strategy For Plant Conservation 2016-2020 North American Botanic Garden Strategy For Plant Conservation 2016-2020 Acknowledgements Published January 2016 by Botanic Gardens Conservation International. Support from the United States Botanic Garden, the American Public Gardens Association, and the Center for Plant Conservation helped make this publication possible. The 2016-2020 North American Botanic Garden Strategy for Plant Conservation is dedicated to the late Steven E. Clemants, who so diligently and ably led the creation of the original North American Strategy published in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Notes
    Research Notes GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION AND HOST PLANTS OF THE CACTUS MOTH, CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM (BERG) IN PUERTO RICO AND THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS The cactus moth, Caddblastis cadorum (Berg)1, was described from Argentina in 1885 in the genus Zophodia. Ragonot2 transferred the species to the genus Caddblastis in his 1901 monograph. C. cadorum occurs endemically in the more northern provinces of Argen­ tina: Entre Ríos, Corrientes, Santa Fe, the northern part of Córdoba, Santiago del Estero, Tucumán, Salta, Juyuy and the Chaco. In Uruguay, it has been recorded along the Uruguay and Plata Rivers from Piriápolis in the south, northward to Salta. The distribution extends from Corrientes in northeastern Argentina northward through Paraguay, where the insect has been observed at Villa de la Concepción and in the vicinity of Asunción, into the Brazilian province of Matto Grosso, where the larva has been recorded at Corumba on the Paraguay River. Heinrich3'4 discussed this species taxonomically in his 1939 and 1956 revisions of the moths belonging to the Phycitinae (Lepidoptera). The most complete account on the biological control of this species was given by Dodd6 in 1940, while Mann6 in 1969 furnished an excellent account of the distribution, host plants and biology of C. cadorum. Simmonds and Bennett7 in 1966 discussed the introduction and host plants of the moth into the Leeward Islands of the West Indies (Nevis, Montserrat, Antigua, St. Kitts). The eggs of Caddblastis cadorum are laid in chains or egg sticks generally at the end of a cactus spine (fig. 1, A). It is well known that larvae (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarantine Host Range and Natural History of Gadirtha Fusca, a Potential Biological Control Agent of Chinese Tallowtree (Triadica Sebifera) in North America
    DOI: 10.1111/eea.12737 Quarantine host range and natural history of Gadirtha fusca, a potential biological control agent of Chinese tallowtree (Triadica sebifera) in North America Gregory S. Wheeler1* , Emily Jones1, Kirsten Dyer1, Nick Silverson1 & Susan A. Wright2 1USDA/ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3225 College Ave., Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA, and 2USDA/ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA Accepted: 23 August 2018 Key words: biocontrol, classical biological control, weed control, Euphorbiaceae, defoliating caterpillar, host range tests, invasive weeds, Sapium, Lepidoptera, Nolidae, integrated pest management, IPM Abstract Classical biological control can provide an ecologically sound, cost-effective, and sustainable manage- ment solution to protect diverse habitats. These natural and managed ecosystems are being invaded and transformed by invasive species. Chinese tallowtree, Triadica sebifera (L.) Small (Euphorbiaceae), is one of the most damaging invasive weeds in the southeastern USA, impacting wetlands, forests, and natural areas. A defoliating moth, Gadirtha fusca Pogue (Lepidoptera: Nolidae), was discovered feeding on Chinese tallowtree leaves in the weed’s native range and has been tested for its suitability as a biological control agent. Natural history studies of G. fusca indicated that the neonates have five instars and require 15.4 days to reach pupation. Complete development from egg hatch to adult emergence required 25.8 days. No differences were found between males and females in terms of life history and nutritional indices measured. Testing of the host range of G. fusca larvae was conducted with no-choice, dual-choice, and multigeneration tests and the results indicated that this species has a very narrow host range.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaktuszok Télállósága Magyarországon
    KAKTUSZOK TÉLÁLLÓSÁGA MAGYARORSZÁGON Doktori értekezés MOHÁCSINÉ SZABÓ KRISZTINA Budapest, 2007. A doktori iskola megnevezése: Kertészettudományi (Interdiszciplináris) tudományága : Növénytermesztési és kertészeti tudományok vezet ője: Dr. Papp János egyetemi tanár, DSc Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Kertészettudományi Kar Gyümölcsterm ő Növények Tanszék Témavezet ők: Dr. Schmidt Gábor tanszékvezető egyetemi tanár, DSc Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Kertészettudományi Kar Dísznövénytermesztési és Dendrológiai Tanszék Dr. Mészáros Zoltán egyetemi tanár, DSc Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem A jelölt a Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Doktori Szabályzatában el őírt valamennyi feltételnek eleget tett, az értekezés m űhelyvitájában elhangzott észrevételeket és javaslatokat az értekezés átdolgozásakor figyelembe vette, ezért az értekezés nyilvános vitára bocsátható. ........................................................... ........................................................................... Az iskolavezet ő jóváhagyása Témavezet ők jóváhagyása A Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Élettudományi Területi Doktori Tanács 2007. december 11-i határozatában a nyilvános vita lefolytatására az alábbi bíráló Bizottságot jelölte ki: BÍRÁLÓ BIZOTTSÁG : Elnöke Rimóczi Imre DSc Tagjai Terbe István CSc Mihalik Erzsébet CSc Kiss Istvánné CSc Opponensek Isépy István CSc Neményi András PhD Titkár Nagy József PhD TARTALOMJEGYZÉK 1. Bevezetés……………………………………………………………………………..………1 2. Irodalmi áttekintés……………………………………………………………………..……..4 2. 1. A kaktuszok botanikai jellemzése……………...…………………………………..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into Chloroplast Genome Variation Across Opuntioideae (Cactaceae)
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.06.981183; this version posted March 8, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Insights into chloroplast genome variation across Opuntioideae (Cactaceae) Matias Köhler1,2, Marcelo Reginato1, Tatiana T. Souza-Chies1, Lucas C. Majure2,3 1 – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 2 – University of Florida Herbarium (FLAS), Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida, United States. 3 – Department of Research, Conservation and Collections, Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, Arizona, United States. Abstract Chloroplast genomes (plastomes) are frequently treated as highly conserved among land plants. However, many lineages of vascular plants have experienced extensive structural rearrangements, including inversions and modifications to the size and content of genes. Cacti are one of these lineages, containing the smallest plastome known for an obligately photosynthetic angiosperm, including the loss of one copy of the inverted repeat (~25 kb) and the ndh genes suite, but only a few cacti from the subfamily Cactoideae have been sufficiently characterized. Here, we investigated the variation of plastome sequences across the second-major lineage of the Cactaceae, the subfamily Opuntioideae, to address 1) how variable is the content and arrangement of chloroplast genome sequences across the subfamily, and 2) how phylogenetically informative are the plastome sequences for resolving major relationships among the clades of Opuntioideae.
    [Show full text]
  • Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature and National Meaning
    Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature and National Meaning Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Burtner, Marcus Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 04:13:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/268613 CRAFTING AND CONSUMING AN AMERICAN SONORAN DESERT: GLOBAL VISIONS, REGIONAL NATURE AND NATIONAL MEANING by Marcus Alexander Burtner ____________________________________ copyright © Marcus Alexander Burtner 2012 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2012 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Marcus A. Burtner entitled “Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature, and National Meaning.” and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Katherine Morrissey ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Douglas Weiner ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Jeremy Vetter ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Jack C. Mutchler Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Management Program Fiscal Year
    Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Management Program Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Final Program Report 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary•3 Introduction•4 Invasive Plant Control Projects•13 East Central Working Group Projects•16 Florida Keys Working Group Projects•28 Mosquito Coast Working Group Projects•37 Northeast Working Group Projects•46 Panhandle Working Group Projects•54 Southeast Working Group Projects•69 Southwest Working Group Projects•81 Sun Coast Working Group Projects•96 Treasure Coast Working Group Projects•110 West Central Working Group Projects•121 Withlacoochee Working Group Projects•136 Melaleuca Program•149 Lygodium Strike Team Projects•152 Herbicide Bank Projects•153 Uplands Program Operations Summary•154 2 Executive Summary ver one-and-one-half million acres of Florida’s melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian Opublic conservation lands have been invaded pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and Old by alien (exotic, nonnative, nonindigenous) plants World climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum) such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, Australian on public conservation lands. These and over pine, and climbing ferns. However, invasive alien one hundred other alien plants have invaded plants respect no boundaries and millions of acres at least 1.5 million acres of Florida’s nearly 11 of private land are also affected. This ongoing million acres of public conservation lands, alien invasion has degraded and diminished affecting an ecotourism economy valued at $13 what remains of Florida’s natural areas, affected billion annually.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Blue Carbon Scoping Study
    Background paper North American Blue Carbon Scoping Study September 2013 Commission for Environmental Cooperation Please cite as: CEC. 2013. North American Blue Carbon Scoping Study. Montreal, Canada. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 49pp. This report was prepared by Samantha D. Sifleet for the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation. The information contained herein is the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily reflect the views of the CEC, or the governments of Canada, Mexico or the United States of America. Reproduction of this document in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes may be made without special permission from the CEC Secretariat, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. The CEC would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication or material that uses this document as a source. Except where otherwise noted, this work is protected under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial-No Derivative Works License. © Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2013 Publication Details Publication type : Background paper Publication date : September, 2013 Original language : English Review and quality assurance procedures : Final Party review: August, 2013 QA12.30 Disponible en français: (Sommaire de rapport) Disponible en español : ( Resumen ejecutivo) Cover photo: Jessica Sypher For more information: Commission for Environmental Cooperation 393, rue St-Jacques Ouest, bureau 200 Montreal (Quebec) H2Y 1N9 Canada t 514.350.4300 f 514.350.4372 [email protected]
    [Show full text]