DOCSLIB.ORG

And Harrisia Aboriginum (Aboriginal Prickly-Apple); Final Rule

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And Harrisia Aboriginum (Aboriginal Prickly-Apple); Final Rule Vol. 81 Friday, No. 14 January 22, 2016 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Consolea corallicola (Florida Semaphore Cactus) and Harrisia aboriginum (Aboriginal Prickly-Apple); Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Jan 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\22JAR2.SGM 22JAR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 3866 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR preamble and/or at http:// proposed designation. We also www.regulations.gov. considered all comments and Fish and Wildlife Service FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: information received from the public Roxanna Hinzman, Field Supervisor, during the comment period. 50 CFR Part 17 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, South Previous Federal Actions [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2014–0057; Florida Ecological Services Office, 1339 4500030113] 20th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960; by Previous Federal actions for Consolea corallicola and Harrisia aboriginum are RIN 1018–AZ92 telephone 772–562–3909; or by facsimile 772–562–4288. If you use a outlined in our proposed and final rules Endangered and Threatened Wildlife telecommunications device for the deaf to list both species as endangered and Plants; Designation of Critical (TDD), call the Federal Information species published in the Federal Habitat for Consolea corallicola Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. Register on October 11, 2012 (77 FR 61836), and October 24, 2013 (78 FR (Florida Semaphore Cactus) and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Harrisia aboriginum (Aboriginal 63796), respectively. Executive Summary Prickly-Apple) Summary of Comments and Why we need to publish a rule. Under Recommendations AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Interior. amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (Act), We requested written comments from ACTION: Final rule. when we determine that any species is the public on the proposed designation threatened or endangered, we must of critical habitat for Consolea SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and designate critical habitat, to the corallicola and Harrisia aboriginum and Wildlife Service, designate critical maximum extent prudent and the associated DEA with the publication habitat for Consolea corallicola (Florida determinable. Designations of critical of the proposed rule to designate critical semaphore cactus) and Harrisia habitat can be completed only by habitat that published January 22, 2015 aboriginum (aboriginal prickly-apple) issuing a rule. (80 FR 3316). The comment period under the Endangered Species Act (Act). This rule consists of: A final rule opened on January 22, 2015, and closed In total, approximately 4,411 acres designating critical habitat for two on March 23, 2015. We did not receive (1,785 hectares) for Consolea corallicola endangered plant species, Consolea any requests for a public hearing. We in Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, corallicola and Harrisia aboriginum. also contacted appropriate Federal, Florida; and 3,444 acres (1,394 hectares) We have prepared an economic State, and local agencies; scientific for Harrisia aboriginum in Manatee, analysis of the designations. In order to organizations; and other interested Charlotte, Sarasota, and Lee Counties, consider economic impacts, we parties and invited them to comment on Florida, fall within the boundaries of prepared an incremental effects the proposed rule and DEA during the the critical habitat designations. memorandum (IEM) and screening comment period. DATES: This rule becomes effective on analysis which, together with our We received four comment letters February 22, 2016. narrative and interpretation of effects, directly addressing the proposed critical ADDRESSES: This final rule is available we consider our draft economic analysis habitat designation. All substantive on the internet at http:// (DEA) of the proposed critical habitat information provided during the www.regulations.gov and http:// designation and related factors. The comment period is addressed below. www.fws.gov/verobeach/. Comments analysis, dated October 15, 2014, was Peer Review and materials we received, as well as made available for public review from some supporting documentation we January 22, 2015, through March 23, In accordance with our peer review used in preparing this rule, are available 2015 (80 FR 3316). The DEA addressed policy published on July 1, 1994 (59 FR for public inspection at http:// probable economic impacts of critical 34270), we solicited expert opinions www.regulations.gov. All of the habitat designation for Consolea from three knowledgeable individuals comments, materials, and corallicola and Harrisia aboriginum. We with scientific expertise that included documentation that we considered in did not receive any comments regarding familiarity with the species, the this rulemaking are available by the DEA; therefore, we consider the geographic region in which the species appointment, during normal business October 15, 2014, DEA, our IEM, and occurs, and conservation biology hours at the South Florida Ecological narrative interpretation of the effects to principles. We received responses from Services Office (see FOR FURTHER be the final economic analysis. two of the peer reviewers. INFORMATION CONTACT). Peer review and public comment. We Both peer reviewers noted that the The coordinates, plot points, or both sought comments from three proposal was comprehensive and that from which the maps are generated are independent specialists to ensure that the data which the Service relied upon included in the administrative record our designation is based on to delineate critical habitat was sound. for this critical habitat designation and scientifically sound data and analyses. Peer reviewers did not provide any new are available at http://www.fws.gov/ We obtained opinions from two of the information that would necessitate verobeach/, at http:// independent specialists with scientific changes to the final rule. Peer reviewer www.regulations.gov at Docket No. expertise to review our technical comments are addressed in the FWS–R4–ES–2014–0057, and at the assumptions, analysis, and whether or following summary. South Florida Ecological Services Office not we had used the best available Peer Reviewer Comments (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). information. These peer reviewers Any additional tools or supporting generally concurred with our methods (1) Comment: The proposed rule information that we developed for this and conclusions and provided references a population within John critical habitat designation will also be additional information, clarifications, Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park. This available at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and suggestions to improve this final population was planted by park staff Service Web site and Field Office listed rule. Information we received from peer and is, therefore, considered cultivated above, and may also be included in the review did not result in changes to the as there is no documentation that VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Jan 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22JAR2.SGM 22JAR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 3867 supports Consolea corallicola occurring many unmapped Keys cactus barren habitat units. While historical aerial historically within the park. areas are included in the final critical imagery would help us understand past Our Response: The proposed rule did habitat designation. habitat conditions and perhaps identify not identify a population of Consolea (3) Comment: One peer reviewer some areas lost to disrupted ecology or corallicola within John Pennekamp stated that proper management of nonnative species, we believe the Coral Reef State Park since the Service individual plants and their habitat may improvement to this critical habitat was unaware that C. corallicola was prove to be very expensive and time designation would be negligible because planted at this location. Although demanding, requiring quarterly the main limiting factor for these individuals of listed plant species population monitoring to remove species is habitat loss due to receive protection under section 7 of the Cactoblastis cactorum larvae, and to development and sea level rise, rather Act regardless of whether they were control other native and nonnative translocated (planted) or originated plants and animals around individual than due to lack of natural disturbance naturally, designation of critical habitat plants. and active management. at John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Our Response: The Service agrees that Comments From the State Park does not mandate the Florida Park conservation of these species will Service to manage the habitat or necessitate a commitment by the Service Section 4(b)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act reintroduce C. corallicola in the areas and our conservation partners. requires the Secretary to give actual identified. John Pennekamp Coral Reef Nonnative plant and animal control is notice of any regulation proposed State Park is located within critical ongoing at some sites, and most thereunder to the State agency in each habitat unit FSC2 that also contains populations are visited at least twice per State in which the species occur, and to Dagny Johnson Botanical State Park year to monitor for Cactoblastis invite comments. Comments received
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taxonomy and Distribution of Opuntia and Related Plants
    Taxonomy and Distribution of Opuntia and Related Genera Raul Puente Desert Botanical Garden Donald Pinkava Arizona State University Subfamily Opuntioideae Ca. 350 spp. 13-18 genera Very wide distribution (Canada to Patagonia) Morphological consistency Glochids Bony arils Generic Boundaries Britton and Rose, 1919 Anderson, 2001 Hunt, 2006 -- Seven genera -- 15 genera --18 genera Austrocylindropuntia Austrocylindropuntia Grusonia Brasiliopuntia Brasiliopuntia Maihuenia Consolea Consolea Nopalea Cumulopuntia Cumulopuntia Opuntia Cylindropuntia Cylindropuntia Pereskiopsis Grusonia Grusonia Pterocactus Maihueniopsis Corynopuntia Tacinga Miqueliopuntia Micropuntia Opuntia Maihueniopsis Nopalea Miqueliopuntia Pereskiopsis Opuntia Pterocactus Nopalea Quiabentia Pereskiopsis Tacinga Pterocactus Tephrocactus Quiabentia Tunilla Tacinga Tephrocactus Tunilla Classification: Family: Cactaceae Subfamily: Maihuenioideae Pereskioideae Cactoideae Opuntioideae Wallace, 2002 Opuntia Griffith, P. 2002 Nopalea nrITS Consolea Tacinga Brasiliopuntia Tunilla Miqueliopuntia Cylindropuntia Grusonia Opuntioideae Grusonia pulchella Pereskiopsis Austrocylindropuntia Quiabentia 95 Cumulopuntia Tephrocactus Pterocactus Maihueniopsis Cactoideae Maihuenioideae Pereskia aculeata Pereskiodeae Pereskia grandiflora Talinum Portulacaceae Origin and Dispersal Andean Region (Wallace and Dickie, 2002) Cylindropuntia Cylindropuntia tesajo Cylindropuntia thurberi (Engelmann) F. M. Knuth Cylindropuntia cholla (Weber) F. M. Knuth Potential overlapping areas between the Opuntia
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys Terrestrial Adaptation Planning (Keystap) Species
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330842954 FLORIDA KEYS TERRESTRIAL ADAPTATION PROJECT: Florida Keys Case Study on Incorporating Climate Change Considerations into Conservation Planning and Actions for Threatened and Endang... Technical Report · January 2018 CITATION READS 1 438 6 authors, including: Logan Benedict Jason M. Evans Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Stetson University 2 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION 87 PUBLICATIONS 983 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Conservation Clinic View project Vinson Institute Policy Papers View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jason M. Evans on 27 April 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. USFWS Cooperative Agreement F16AC01213 Florida Keys Case Study on Incorporating Climate Change Considerations into Conservation Planning and Actions for Threatened and Endangered Species Project Coordinator: Logan Benedict, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Project Team: Bob Glazer, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Chris Bergh, The Nature Conservancy Steve Traxler, US Fish and Wildlife Service Beth Stys, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Jason Evans, Stetson University Project Report Photo by Logan Benedict Cover Photo by Ricardo Zambrano 1 | Page USFWS Cooperative Agreement F16AC01213 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State Parks Data by 2021 House District
    30, Florida State Parks FY 2019-20 Data by 2021 House Districts This compilation was produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation . FloridaStateParksFoundation.org Statewide Totals • 175 Florida State Parks and Trails (164 Parks / 11 Trails) comprising nearly 800,000 Acres • $2.2 billion direct impact to Florida’s economy • $150 million in sales tax revenue • 31,810 jobs supported • 25 million visitors served # of Economic Jobs Park House Districts Parks Impact Supported Visitors 1 Salzman, Michelle 0 2 Andrade, Robert Alexander “Alex” 3 31,073,188 436 349,462 Big Lagoon State Park 10,336,536 145 110,254 Perdido Key State Park 17,191,206 241 198,276 Tarklin Bayou Preserve State Park 3,545,446 50 40,932 3 Williamson, Jayer 3 26,651,285 416 362,492 Blackwater Heritage State Trail 18,971,114 266 218,287 Blackwater River State Park 7,101,563 99 78,680 Yellow River Marsh Preserve State Park 578,608 51 65,525 4 Maney, Thomas Patterson “Patt” 2 41,626,278 583 469,477 Fred Gannon Rocky Bayou State Park 7,558,966 106 83,636 Henderson Beach State Park 34,067,312 477 385,841 5 Drake, Brad 9 64,140,859 897 696,022 Camp Helen State Park 3,133,710 44 32,773 Deer Lake State Park 1,738,073 24 19,557 Eden Gardens State Park 3,235,182 45 36,128 Falling Waters State Park 5,510,029 77 58,866 Florida Caverns State Park 4,090,576 57 39,405 Grayton Beach State Park 17,072,108 239 186,686 Ponce de Leon Springs State Park 6,911,495 97 78,277 Three Rivers State Park 2,916,005 41 30,637 Topsail Hill Preserve State Park 19,533,681 273 213,693 6 Trumbull, Jay 2 45,103,015 632 504,860 Camp Helen State Park 3,133,710 44 32,773 St.
    [Show full text]
  • House Districts (This Compilation Was Produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation, January 2019)
    Florida State Parks FY 2017-18 Data by 2019 House Districts (This compilation was produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation, January 2019) . State Wide Totals • 175 Florida State Parks and Trails (164 Parks / 11 Trails) comprising nearly 800,000 Acres • $2.4 billion direct economic impact • $158 million in sales tax revenue • 33,587 jobs supported • Over 28 million visitors served # of Economic Jobs Park House Districts Parks Impact Supported Visitors 1 Hill, Walter Bryan “Mike” 0 2 Andre, Robert Alexander “Alex” 3 28,135,146 393 338,807 Big Lagoon State Park 12,155,746 170 141,517 Perdido Key State Park 12,739,427 178 157,126 Tarklin Bayou Preserve State Park 3,239,973 45 40,164 3 Williamson, Jayer 3 22,545,992 315 275,195 Blackwater Heritage State Trail 15,301,348 214 188,630 Blackwater River State Park 6,361,036 89 75,848 Yellow River Marsh Preserve State Park 883,608 12 10,717 4 Ponder, Mel 2 46,877,022 657 564,936 Fred Gannon Rocky Bayou State Park 7,896,093 111 88,633 Henderson Beach State Park 38,980,929 546 476,303 5 Drake, Brad 9 75,811,647 1062 881,589 Camp Helen State Park 2,778,378 39 31,704 Deer Lake State Park 1,654,544 23 19,939 Eden Gardens State Park 3,298,681 46 39,601 Falling Waters State Park 5,761,074 81 67,225 Florida Caverns State Park 12,217,659 171 135,677 Grayton Beach State Park 20,250,255 284 236,181 Ponce de Leon Springs State Park 4,745,495 66 57,194 Three Rivers State Park 3,465,975 49 39,482 Topsail Hill Preserve State Park 21,639,586 303 254,586 6 Trumbull, Jay 2 76,186,412 1,067 926,162 Camp Helen State Park 2,778,378 39 31,704 St.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Botanic Garden Strategy for Plant Conservation 2016-2020 Botanic Gardens Conservation International
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Reports Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences 1-1-2016 North American Botanic Garden Strategy for Plant Conservation 2016-2020 Botanic Gardens Conservation International American Public Gardens Association Asociacion Mexicana de Jardines Center for Plant Conservation Plant Conservation Alliance See next page for additional authors Find out more information about Nova Southeastern University and the Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography. Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facreports Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Authors Botanic Gardens Conservation International, American Public Gardens Association, Asociacion Mexicana de Jardines, Center for Plant Conservation, Plant Conservation Alliance, Pam Allenstein, Robert Bye, Jennifer Ceska, John Clark, Jenny Cruse-Sanders, Gerard Donnelly, Christopher Dunn, Anne Frances, David Galbraith, Jordan Golubov, Gennadyi Gurman, Kayri Havens, Abby Hird Meyer, Douglas Justice, Edelmira Linares, Maria Magdalena Hernandez, Beatriz Maruri Aguilar, Mike Maunder, Ray Mims, Greg Mueller, Jennifer Ramp Neale, Martin Nicholson, Ari Novy, Susan Pell, John J. Pipoly III, Diane Ragone, Peter Raven, Erin Riggs, Kate Sackman, Emiliano Sanchez Martinez, Suzanne Sharrock, Casey Sclar, Paul Smith, Murphy Westwood, Rebecca Wolf, and Peter Wyse Jackson North American Botanic Garden Strategy For Plant Conservation 2016-2020 North American Botanic Garden Strategy For Plant Conservation 2016-2020 Acknowledgements Published January 2016 by Botanic Gardens Conservation International. Support from the United States Botanic Garden, the American Public Gardens Association, and the Center for Plant Conservation helped make this publication possible. The 2016-2020 North American Botanic Garden Strategy for Plant Conservation is dedicated to the late Steven E. Clemants, who so diligently and ably led the creation of the original North American Strategy published in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Notes
    Research Notes GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION AND HOST PLANTS OF THE CACTUS MOTH, CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM (BERG) IN PUERTO RICO AND THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS The cactus moth, Caddblastis cadorum (Berg)1, was described from Argentina in 1885 in the genus Zophodia. Ragonot2 transferred the species to the genus Caddblastis in his 1901 monograph. C. cadorum occurs endemically in the more northern provinces of Argen­ tina: Entre Ríos, Corrientes, Santa Fe, the northern part of Córdoba, Santiago del Estero, Tucumán, Salta, Juyuy and the Chaco. In Uruguay, it has been recorded along the Uruguay and Plata Rivers from Piriápolis in the south, northward to Salta. The distribution extends from Corrientes in northeastern Argentina northward through Paraguay, where the insect has been observed at Villa de la Concepción and in the vicinity of Asunción, into the Brazilian province of Matto Grosso, where the larva has been recorded at Corumba on the Paraguay River. Heinrich3'4 discussed this species taxonomically in his 1939 and 1956 revisions of the moths belonging to the Phycitinae (Lepidoptera). The most complete account on the biological control of this species was given by Dodd6 in 1940, while Mann6 in 1969 furnished an excellent account of the distribution, host plants and biology of C. cadorum. Simmonds and Bennett7 in 1966 discussed the introduction and host plants of the moth into the Leeward Islands of the West Indies (Nevis, Montserrat, Antigua, St. Kitts). The eggs of Caddblastis cadorum are laid in chains or egg sticks generally at the end of a cactus spine (fig. 1, A). It is well known that larvae (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarantine Host Range and Natural History of Gadirtha Fusca, a Potential Biological Control Agent of Chinese Tallowtree (Triadica Sebifera) in North America
    DOI: 10.1111/eea.12737 Quarantine host range and natural history of Gadirtha fusca, a potential biological control agent of Chinese tallowtree (Triadica sebifera) in North America Gregory S. Wheeler1* , Emily Jones1, Kirsten Dyer1, Nick Silverson1 & Susan A. Wright2 1USDA/ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3225 College Ave., Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA, and 2USDA/ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA Accepted: 23 August 2018 Key words: biocontrol, classical biological control, weed control, Euphorbiaceae, defoliating caterpillar, host range tests, invasive weeds, Sapium, Lepidoptera, Nolidae, integrated pest management, IPM Abstract Classical biological control can provide an ecologically sound, cost-effective, and sustainable manage- ment solution to protect diverse habitats. These natural and managed ecosystems are being invaded and transformed by invasive species. Chinese tallowtree, Triadica sebifera (L.) Small (Euphorbiaceae), is one of the most damaging invasive weeds in the southeastern USA, impacting wetlands, forests, and natural areas. A defoliating moth, Gadirtha fusca Pogue (Lepidoptera: Nolidae), was discovered feeding on Chinese tallowtree leaves in the weed’s native range and has been tested for its suitability as a biological control agent. Natural history studies of G. fusca indicated that the neonates have five instars and require 15.4 days to reach pupation. Complete development from egg hatch to adult emergence required 25.8 days. No differences were found between males and females in terms of life history and nutritional indices measured. Testing of the host range of G. fusca larvae was conducted with no-choice, dual-choice, and multigeneration tests and the results indicated that this species has a very narrow host range.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaktuszok Télállósága Magyarországon
    KAKTUSZOK TÉLÁLLÓSÁGA MAGYARORSZÁGON Doktori értekezés MOHÁCSINÉ SZABÓ KRISZTINA Budapest, 2007. A doktori iskola megnevezése: Kertészettudományi (Interdiszciplináris) tudományága : Növénytermesztési és kertészeti tudományok vezet ője: Dr. Papp János egyetemi tanár, DSc Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Kertészettudományi Kar Gyümölcsterm ő Növények Tanszék Témavezet ők: Dr. Schmidt Gábor tanszékvezető egyetemi tanár, DSc Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Kertészettudományi Kar Dísznövénytermesztési és Dendrológiai Tanszék Dr. Mészáros Zoltán egyetemi tanár, DSc Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem A jelölt a Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Doktori Szabályzatában el őírt valamennyi feltételnek eleget tett, az értekezés m űhelyvitájában elhangzott észrevételeket és javaslatokat az értekezés átdolgozásakor figyelembe vette, ezért az értekezés nyilvános vitára bocsátható. ........................................................... ........................................................................... Az iskolavezet ő jóváhagyása Témavezet ők jóváhagyása A Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Élettudományi Területi Doktori Tanács 2007. december 11-i határozatában a nyilvános vita lefolytatására az alábbi bíráló Bizottságot jelölte ki: BÍRÁLÓ BIZOTTSÁG : Elnöke Rimóczi Imre DSc Tagjai Terbe István CSc Mihalik Erzsébet CSc Kiss Istvánné CSc Opponensek Isépy István CSc Neményi András PhD Titkár Nagy József PhD TARTALOMJEGYZÉK 1. Bevezetés……………………………………………………………………………..………1 2. Irodalmi áttekintés……………………………………………………………………..……..4 2. 1. A kaktuszok botanikai jellemzése……………...…………………………………..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into Chloroplast Genome Variation Across Opuntioideae (Cactaceae)
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.06.981183; this version posted March 8, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Insights into chloroplast genome variation across Opuntioideae (Cactaceae) Matias Köhler1,2, Marcelo Reginato1, Tatiana T. Souza-Chies1, Lucas C. Majure2,3 1 – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 2 – University of Florida Herbarium (FLAS), Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida, United States. 3 – Department of Research, Conservation and Collections, Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, Arizona, United States. Abstract Chloroplast genomes (plastomes) are frequently treated as highly conserved among land plants. However, many lineages of vascular plants have experienced extensive structural rearrangements, including inversions and modifications to the size and content of genes. Cacti are one of these lineages, containing the smallest plastome known for an obligately photosynthetic angiosperm, including the loss of one copy of the inverted repeat (~25 kb) and the ndh genes suite, but only a few cacti from the subfamily Cactoideae have been sufficiently characterized. Here, we investigated the variation of plastome sequences across the second-major lineage of the Cactaceae, the subfamily Opuntioideae, to address 1) how variable is the content and arrangement of chloroplast genome sequences across the subfamily, and 2) how phylogenetically informative are the plastome sequences for resolving major relationships among the clades of Opuntioideae.
    [Show full text]
  • Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature and National Meaning
    Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature and National Meaning Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Burtner, Marcus Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 04:13:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/268613 CRAFTING AND CONSUMING AN AMERICAN SONORAN DESERT: GLOBAL VISIONS, REGIONAL NATURE AND NATIONAL MEANING by Marcus Alexander Burtner ____________________________________ copyright © Marcus Alexander Burtner 2012 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2012 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Marcus A. Burtner entitled “Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature, and National Meaning.” and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Katherine Morrissey ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Douglas Weiner ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Jeremy Vetter ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Jack C. Mutchler Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Management Program Fiscal Year
    Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Management Program Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Final Program Report 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary•3 Introduction•4 Invasive Plant Control Projects•13 East Central Working Group Projects•16 Florida Keys Working Group Projects•28 Mosquito Coast Working Group Projects•37 Northeast Working Group Projects•46 Panhandle Working Group Projects•54 Southeast Working Group Projects•69 Southwest Working Group Projects•81 Sun Coast Working Group Projects•96 Treasure Coast Working Group Projects•110 West Central Working Group Projects•121 Withlacoochee Working Group Projects•136 Melaleuca Program•149 Lygodium Strike Team Projects•152 Herbicide Bank Projects•153 Uplands Program Operations Summary•154 2 Executive Summary ver one-and-one-half million acres of Florida’s melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian Opublic conservation lands have been invaded pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and Old by alien (exotic, nonnative, nonindigenous) plants World climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum) such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, Australian on public conservation lands. These and over pine, and climbing ferns. However, invasive alien one hundred other alien plants have invaded plants respect no boundaries and millions of acres at least 1.5 million acres of Florida’s nearly 11 of private land are also affected. This ongoing million acres of public conservation lands, alien invasion has degraded and diminished affecting an ecotourism economy valued at $13 what remains of Florida’s natural areas, affected billion annually.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Blue Carbon Scoping Study
    Background paper North American Blue Carbon Scoping Study September 2013 Commission for Environmental Cooperation Please cite as: CEC. 2013. North American Blue Carbon Scoping Study. Montreal, Canada. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 49pp. This report was prepared by Samantha D. Sifleet for the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation. The information contained herein is the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily reflect the views of the CEC, or the governments of Canada, Mexico or the United States of America. Reproduction of this document in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes may be made without special permission from the CEC Secretariat, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. The CEC would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication or material that uses this document as a source. Except where otherwise noted, this work is protected under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial-No Derivative Works License. © Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2013 Publication Details Publication type : Background paper Publication date : September, 2013 Original language : English Review and quality assurance procedures : Final Party review: August, 2013 QA12.30 Disponible en français: (Sommaire de rapport) Disponible en español : ( Resumen ejecutivo) Cover photo: Jessica Sypher For more information: Commission for Environmental Cooperation 393, rue St-Jacques Ouest, bureau 200 Montreal (Quebec) H2Y 1N9 Canada t 514.350.4300 f 514.350.4372 [email protected]
    [Show full text]