RUSSIA and QATAR Mark N

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RUSSIA and QATAR Mark N RUSSIA AND QATAR Mark N. Katz* This article discusses the improvement in relations between Russia and Qatar between the years 2004 to 2007 and the significance of this rapprochement. From 2004 to 2007, relations between Yandarbiyev was vice president of Russia and Qatar went from extremely poor to Chechnya under Dzhokhar Dudayev. When remarkably cooperative. How did this happen? the latter was killed by Russian forces in April Considering that Russia and Qatar are both 1996, Yandarbiyev became acting president. among the world’s three largest producers of Yandarbiyev, however, lost the Chechen natural gas (the third being Iran), what does presidential elections of January 1997. He then this Russian-Qatari rapprochement portend? went to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan where he Even early on in the Putin era, there was opened a Chechen embassy in Kabul and a recognition in Moscow that Russia could consulate in Kandahar. By 1999, though, he benefit from cooperating with Qatar in the oil had moved to Qatar where he reportedly raised and gas spheres.1 Moscow also hoped to sell money for the Chechen cause.6 From 1999 arms to Qatar as well as to boost trade and through most of 2002, Moscow “periodically investment ties with the country. The visit of raised the issue of Yandarbiyev’s presence in the emir of Qatar, Shaykh Hamad bin Khalifa Qatar,” but only “half-heartedly,” according to al-Thani to Moscow and his meeting with Vremya novostei.7 The Kremlin, however, Putin in December 2001 raised expectations stepped up its demands after the October 2002 for increased Russian-Qatari cooperation.2 seizure of a Moscow theater by Chechen There was even talk of Russia and Qatar rebels and the ensuing hostage crisis. One of working together to create a “gas OPEC the leaders of this group spoke to Yandarbiyev [Organization of the Petroleum Exporting by cell phone during the crisis, which was Countries].”3 proof enough for Moscow that Yandarbiyev None of these prospects for Russian-Qatari was an accomplice.8 In addition to getting cooperation, however, were fulfilled—at least Yandarbiyev placed on Interpol’s most- not then. There were also important wanted list, the UN Security Council’s differences between Moscow and Doha related counterterrorist committee added him to its to Chechnya. Even when he was still prime “sanctions list” in June 2003. Russia formally minister, Putin declared Qatar to be one of a requested Yandarbiyev’s extradition from dozen countries which he believed was Qatar in May 2003. Yet while “Officials in “exporting terrorism to Russia.”4 At the time Qatar promised to consider the request,” they of the visit made by the Russian president’s did not take any action against him.9 special representative Vasily Sredin to all the On February 13, 2004, Yandarbiyev died in Gulf Cooperation Council states in late 2000, Doha when the vehicle he was traveling in Nezavisimaya gazeta described these countries blew up. Shortly thereafter, Qatari authorities as “a very difficult region for Russia, in large detained three Russian officials whom they part due to the Chechen problem.”5 In accused of killing Yandarbiyev. As it would addition, a sharp dispute arose between on other occasions when Putin opponents died Moscow and Doha over former Chechen rebel suddenly and mysteriously, Moscow hotly president Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev. denied any involvement in Yandarbiyev’s Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 11, No. 4 (December 2007) 1 Russia and Qatar death.10 Yet circumstantial evidence strongly declined, though, to name the prison where suggested that it was. they were being held.18 Even if they are no Since one of the three detained Russians longer actually in prison, the two have not had a diplomatic passport, he was released to surfaced in public, and so there is no evidence the Russian Embassy in Doha. The other two, that Russia has violated the prisoner exchange however, were held and charged with agreement with Qatar. complicity in murder.11 Moscow’s initial During 2005 and 2006, Russian-Qatari reaction was extremely hostile and belligerent; relations quietly improved. In April 2006, a Qatari wrestler and his trainer were arrested Qatar joined Russia and Iran in announcing at Sheremetovo airport, in an apparent the provision of funds to the Palestinian retaliation for Qatar’s arrest of the two Authority despite the American-European- Russians. The trainer, though, turned out to be Israeli embargo against it. Vremya novostei a citizen of Belarus and not Qatar, while the seemed to delight in pointing out that this wrestler was a citizen of both Qatar and caused tension in U.S.-Qatari relations.19 In Belarus. Further, Russian Defense Minister May 2006, Sergei Lavrov went to Doha to Sergei Ivanov stated that the “Russian participate in the Dialogue on Cooperation in leadership will use all available leverage on Asia. He delivered a message from Putin to Qatar to secure its citizens’ release,” thus the emir, but little of substance regarding raising the possibility that Moscow respond Russian-Qatari relations appears to have with the use of force.12 Doha initially refused occurred.20 In October 2006, the Qatari to allow into Qatar attorneys from abroad for Foreign Minister visited Moscow and met the detained Russians.13 with Putin, who made a point of thanking Yet the crisis began to de-escalate Qatar for supporting Russia in becoming an following a March 2004 telephone observer member of the Organization of the conversation between Putin and the Qatari Islamic Conference in 2005.21 Emir. Russian authorities soon thereafter Russian-Qatari relations appeared to released the Qatari wrestler and his trainer, improve dramatically when Putin himself paid who immediately flew to Doha. Qatar then a visit to Qatar (as well as Saudi Arabia and declared persona non grata the Russian with Jordan) in February 2007. His visit to Qatar, the diplomatic passport whom Doha believed however, appeared to be particularly was also involved in Yandarbiyev’s death; he significant since it occurred shortly after two immediately left for Moscow.14 Speculation events: first, the January 2007 proposal by soon arose that Moscow and Doha had Iranian Supreme Leader Khamene’i that reached a face-saving agreement to resolve the Russia and Iran work to form a natural gas crisis. In the months that followed, the two cartel;22 and second, Putin’s February 10, Russians were tried and convicted of murder, 2007 speech in Munich that was highly critical but were sentenced to life in prison—not to of American foreign policy and which seemed death.15 A Qatari appellate court soon upheld aimed at rallying other governments, as well both their guilty verdicts and their life as world public opinion, against it.23 sentences.16 Not long afterward, Russia and Despite his Munich speech, Putin did not Qatar signed a prisoner exchange agreement. emphasize this anti-American theme in Qatar. At the end of 2004, the Qatari Emir allowed He was also somewhat coy about the gas the two Russians to return to Russia to serve cartel proposal, stating that he had not rejected out their sentences.17 it but found the idea “interesting.” He Once this happened, the crisis in Russian- emphasized, though, that the idea needed to be Qatari relations appeared to come to an end. “examined,” especially in light of the Speculation arose that Moscow would release “mistakes” that “other cartel organizations” the two Russians, but in December 2005, a (apparently referring to OPEC) had made. He Russian official denied this and stated that also noted that there was nothing to prevent they were still serving their sentences. He gas producing countries from consulting and 2 Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 11, No. 4 (December 2007) Mark N. Katz coordinating their approaches.24 Putin even out, it would be extremely difficult (perhaps indicated that “Russia and Qatar will impossible) to create a cartel that could coordinate their actions in the gas sphere influence natural gas prices as effectively as irrespective of whether a gas equivalent of OPEC influences oil prices. Most of the OPEC is set up.”25 world’s natural gas (80 percent according to Indeed, there was no Russian-Qatari Valery Yazev, president of the Russian Gas agreement about working to create a gas Society) is sold under long-term contracts.32 cartel. Instead, a far more modest agreement This and the fact that most of the world’s was reached on protecting investments in each natural gas is conveyed by pipelines that are other’s countries.26 In addition, Russian expensive and cannot be rerouted when a presidential aide Sergei Prikhodko noted that pricing dispute occurs means that there is not a Russian companies, including Gazprom, global market for natural gas, but many Lukoil, and RUSAL, sought investment separate markets. In addition, the strong opportunities in Qatar.27 Lukoil and Qatar linkage that has so far existed between natural Petroleum signed an MOU on “possible joint gas prices and oil prices also limits the ability activities” in Qatar.28 Qatari-Russian military- of gas producers to set prices. technical cooperation was also discussed, As Kommersant noted in April 2007, though no specific agreements were though, liquefied natural gas (LNG) amounted announced.29 Shortly after Putin’s visit, to only 6.9 percent of global gas consumption Russian sources expressed the hope that Qatar in 2005, but is set to rise rapidly.33 Qatar, would purchase Russian weapons. A Gazprom which mainly ships its natural gas as LNG, delegation visited Qatar in March 2007 to could increase its exports tremendously. Qatar discuss cooperation in the oil and gas spheres (or any other LNG producer) can sell its with Qatar Petroleum, Qatargas, and the Qatar natural gas to any country with LNG re- State Investment Agency.30 gasification facilities, or countries that can In April 2007, the annual meeting of the build them—including those to which Russia Gas Exporting Countries Forum (GECF) took either now exports or hopes to export gas via place in Qatar.
Recommended publications
  • Russian-Speaking
    NOVEMBER 2017 ‘RUSSIAN-SPEAKING’ FIGHTERS IN SYRIA, IRAQ AND AT HOME: CONSEQUENCES AND CONTEXT FULL REPORT Mark Youngman and Dr Cerwyn Moore Centre for Russian, European and Eurasian Studies Department of Political Science and International Studies University of Birmingham This report was produced out of the Actors and Narratives programme, funded by CREST. To find out more information about this programme, and to see other outputs from the team, visit the CREST website at: https://crestresearch.ac.uk/projects/actors-and-narratives/ About the authors: Mark Youngman is an ESRC-funded doctoral student and Cerwyn Moore a Senior Lecturer in the Centre for Russian, European and Eurasian Studies at the University of Birmingham. Disclaimer: This report has been part funded by an ESRC IAA award and part funded by the Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (ESRC Award: ES/N009614/1). It draws on the existing work of the authors, and supplements their work with original research and ongoing data collection of Russian-speaking foreign fighters.www.crestresearch.co.uk The cover image, Caucasus Emirate, is a remixed derivative ofProposed divisions of the Caucasus Emirate by ArnoldPlaton, under CC BY-SA 3.0. Caucasus Emirate is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. by R. Stevens, CREST. ©2017 CREST Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence. www.crestresearch.ac.uk/copyright CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................4 PART I: ASSESSING THE ‘RUSSIAN-SPEAKING’
    [Show full text]
  • The North Caucasus Ways Forward for Russia and the European Union
    Building Stability in the North Caucasus Ways Forward for Russia and the European Union SIPRI Policy Paper No. 16 Neil J. Melvin Stockholm International Peace Research Institute May 2007 © SIPRI, 2007 ISSN 1652-0432 (print) ISSN 1653-7548 (online) Printed in Sweden by CM Gruppen, Bromma Contents Preface iv Map of the North Caucasus vi Table A.1. Data on the North Caucasus and the Russian Federation vii 1. Introduction: instability in the North Caucasus 1 The structure of this Policy Paper 6 2. The roots of instability in the North Caucasus 7 Incorporation and pacification 7 The North Caucasus in the Soviet Union 9 World War II and Stalin 11 The post-Stalin era and perestroika 12 The North Caucasus in the Russian Federation 15 Nationalist mobilization 15 The failure of state building in the North Caucasus 17 Religious revival 18 The first Chechen war 21 3. The North Caucasus in the Putin era 24 Putin’s new course 24 Replacing local elites 26 The second Chechen war 28 Russia’s ‘war on terrorism’ 31 The role of the international community 35 4. Prospects for the North Caucasus 37 National–territorial issues 37 Islam and Islamism 40 Governance in the North Caucasus 43 Socio-economic issues 44 Russia’s security policies 45 The North Caucasus and the European Union 46 5. Recommendations 48 Recommendations for the Russian Federation 48 Recommendations for the European Union 54 About the author 59 Preface For most people, the notion of conflict in the North Caucasus—a region within the Russian Federation, as distinct from the independent states of the South Cau- casus—is synonymous with Chechnya.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Islamic Diplom
    Russia's Islamic Diplom Russia's Islamic Diplomacy ed. Marlene Laruelle CAP paper no. 220, June 2019 "Islam in Russia, Russia in the Islamic World" Initiative Russia’s Islamic Diplomacy Ed. Marlene Laruelle The Initiative “Islam in Russia, Russia in the Islamic World” is generously funded by the Henry Luce Foundation Cover photo: Talgat Tadjuddin, Chief Mufti of Russia and head of the Central Muslim Spiritual Board of Russia, meeting with the Armenian Catholicos Karekin II and Mufti Ismail Berdiyev, President of the Karachay-Cherkessia Spiritual Board, Moscow, December 1, 2016. Credit : Artyom Korotayev, TASS/Alamy Live News HAGFW9. Table of Contents Chapter 1. Russia and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation: Conflicting Interactions Grigory Kosach………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 Chapter 2. Always Looming: The Russian Muslim Factor in Moscow's Relations with Gulf Arab States Mark N. Katz………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2 1 Chapter 3. Russia and the Islamic Worlds: The Case of Shia Islam Clément Therme ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 25 Chapter 4. A Kadyrovization of Russian Foreign Policy in the Middle East: Autocrats in Track II Diplomacy and Other Humanitarian Activities Jean-Francois Ratelle……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 1 Chapter 5. Tatarstan's Paradiplomacy with the Islamic World Guzel Yusupova……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 7 Chapter 6. Russian Islamic Religious Authorities and Their Activities at the Regional, National, and International Levels Denis Sokolov………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 41 Chapter 7. The Economics of the Hajj: The Case of Tatarstan Azat Akhunov…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 7 Chapter 8. The Effect of the Pilgrimage to Mecca on the Socio-Political Views of Muslims in Russia’s North Caucasus Mikhail Alexseev…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 3 Authors’ Biographies……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 9 @ 2019 Central Asia Program Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Predictive Game Theoretic Model to Assess US - Russian Response to an Islamic Safe-Haven in the Caucasus Region
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Computational Modeling & Simulation Computational Modeling & Simulation Engineering Theses & Dissertations Engineering Summer 2010 A Predictive Game Theoretic Model to Assess US - Russian Response to an Islamic Safe-Haven in the Caucasus Region Christopher Wayne Hartline Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/msve_etds Part of the Operational Research Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Hartline, Christopher W.. "A Predictive Game Theoretic Model to Assess US - Russian Response to an Islamic Safe-Haven in the Caucasus Region" (2010). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Computational Modeling & Simulation Engineering, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/sk27-wz76 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/msve_etds/37 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Computational Modeling & Simulation Engineering at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Computational Modeling & Simulation Engineering Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A PREDICTIVE GAME THEORETIC MODEL TO ASSESS US - RUSSIAN RESPONSE TO AN ISLAMIC SAFE-HAVEN IN THE CAUCASUS REGION by Christopher Wayne Hartline B.S. June 1997, University of Texas El Paso A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE MODELING AND SIMULATION OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2010 Approved by: John A. Sokolowski (Director) Catherine M. Banks (Member) Andrew J. Collins (Member) ABSTRACT A PREDICTIVE GAME THEORETIC MODEL TO ASSESS US - RUSSIAN RESPONSE TO AN ISLAMIC SAFE-HAVEN IN THE CAUCASUS REGION.
    [Show full text]
  • The Security of the Caspian Sea Region
    17. The glitter and poverty of Chechen Islam Aleksei Malashenko I. Introduction Originally the separatist movement in Chechnya was unrelated to Islam. Its ideology was ethnic nationalism and its goal was the establishment of an inde- pendent national state. The Chechen separatists’ social base was limited: far from all members of Chechen society supported the idea of independence. Nor, it seems, did the leaders of the Chechen insurgents seriously believe that it was possible for Chechnya to attain true independence. The future president of the self-proclaimed Chechen Republic of Ichkeriya, Soviet Air Force Major- General Dzhokhar Dudayev, used to say that after Chechnya gained inde- pendence it would join the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and preserve its close economic and political ties with Russia. Before the beginning of the armed struggle for independence the Chechens aimed at maximum autonomy within the Russian Federation. The strategic tasks which the Chechen leaders set themselves were largely similar to those pursued, and realized for a period of time, by the ethno-political elite of Tatar- stan.1 In Chechnya, for a number of reasons (which are not the subject of the present study), the conflict between the centre and Grozny followed a different path—that of military–political confrontation, in which Islam became one of the main ideological and political vectors. In the Russian scholarly literature and other publications much has been written about the important role of Islam in the events of the 1990s in Chechnya. The more convincing work is that of Vakhid Akaev (a Chechen researcher),2 Alexei Kudryavtsev and Vladimir Bobrovnikov (two orientalists based in Moscow), and the journalist experts Ilya Maksakov and Igor Rotar.3 1 In 1993 only 2 republics—Tatarstan and Chechnya—refused to sign the Federation Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Terrorist Attack
    4 April 9, 2017 Debate Russia terrorist attack Home-grown terrorism in Saint Petersburg or Syrian spillover? he suicide and security policy. bombing in the The Russian Federation is a Saint Petersburg heterogeneous country, composed Metro was not of many religious groups, including unexpected. approximately 20 million Muslims. Russia has Many of them are heavily Russified witnessed some of and tend to be secular but over the Emmanuel the worst terrorist last two decades, and accelerating Karagiannis attacksT in Europe: The Budyon- in recent years, there has been a novsk hospital hostage crisis in process of radicalisation of Russia’s 1995, the attack at the Dubrovka Muslim communities. The hotbed Theatre in Moscow in 2002, the of political Islam remains the North Beslan school hostage crisis in Caucasus. 2004, the Moscow Metro bombings The Russian-Chechen conflict in 2010 and the suicide bombings started as a separatist conflict but in Volgograd in 2013. turned into a religious one. Russian authorities identified a Bombings and other attacks have Kyrgyz-born Russian citizen as the spread to neighbouring autono- perpetrator of the latest assault. mous republics of Karachay- The logic of the attack against a Cherkessia, Kabardino-Balkaria soft, high-profile target was and Dagestan, indicating an Lingering questions. Women grieve near the Tekhnologichesky straightforward: To inflict massive ever-widening scope of operations Institut subway station in Saint Petersburg, on April 3rd. (AP) casualties on the population and for jihadist groups. undermine Russian President The Saint Petersburg suicide targeted Russia and more attacks networks in a kind of self-fulfilling Vladimir Putin’s image as a strong bomber could have been a member are likely to take place.
    [Show full text]
  • Chechnya – War and History 400 Years of Colonial Conquest – 400 Years of Resistance
    Ekkehard Maaß | Bettina Kubanek Chechnya War and History 400 Years of Colonial Conquest – 400 Years of Resistance This exhibition was produced by the German-Caucasian Society An old Chechen legend A long, long time ago there was a violent storm. It plucked trees by their roots, caused rivers and seas to burst their banks and razed mountains flat. It was so violent that all living beings fled before it. None resis- ted but a lone wolf, who stood fast on all four legs to spite the storm. The storm grew angry, tearing the wolf’s hide from his body in tatters and biting him until his blood ran, and yet the wolf would not flinch from where he stood… for he had no other home but this and refused to abandon it, however great the misfortune that befell it. Chechnya – War and History 400 Years of Colonial Conquest – 400 Years of Resistance When Chechnya left the Soviet Union in 1991 to declare independence, its prospects were just as real as those of former Soviet republics in the Baltic, South Caucasus and Asia. Never did the Chechens imagine that their country would be totally destroyed by air raids and artillery fire during two Russian wars while Western democracies, for the most part, stood by. 200,000 dead, the plight of refugees, concentration camps, purges and cruel torture have uprooted Chechen society and driven people to a despair that makes them increasingly unpredictable. The spread of the conflict throughout the North Caucasus and its devastat- ing impact on Russian society itself should be a cause for deep concern among the governments of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Caucasus Ways Forward for Russia and the European Union
    Building Stability in the North Caucasus Ways Forward for Russia and the European Union SIPRI Policy Paper No. 16 Neil J. Melvin Stockholm International Peace Research Institute May 2007 © SIPRI, 2007 ISSN 1652-0432 (print) ISSN 1653-7548 (online) Printed in Sweden by CM Gruppen, Bromma Contents Preface iv Map of the North Caucasus vi Table A.1. Data on the North Caucasus and the Russian Federation vii 1. Introduction: instability in the North Caucasus 1 The structure of this Policy Paper 6 2. The roots of instability in the North Caucasus 7 Incorporation and pacification 7 The North Caucasus in the Soviet Union 9 World War II and Stalin 11 The post-Stalin era and perestroika 12 The North Caucasus in the Russian Federation 15 Nationalist mobilization 15 The failure of state building in the North Caucasus 17 Religious revival 18 The first Chechen war 21 3. The North Caucasus in the Putin era 24 Putin’s new course 24 Replacing local elites 26 The second Chechen war 28 Russia’s ‘war on terrorism’ 31 The role of the international community 35 4. Prospects for the North Caucasus 37 National–territorial issues 37 Islam and Islamism 40 Governance in the North Caucasus 43 Socio-economic issues 44 Russia’s security policies 45 The North Caucasus and the European Union 46 5. Recommendations 48 Recommendations for the Russian Federation 48 Recommendations for the European Union 54 About the author 59 Preface For most people, the notion of conflict in the North Caucasus—a region within the Russian Federation, as distinct from the independent states of the South Cau- casus—is synonymous with Chechnya.
    [Show full text]
  • Believed to Target Chechen Leaders Pentagon Analysts Cite April Attack;
    Russian hit squad believed to target Chechen leaders Pentagon analysts cite April attack; BySusan Katz Keating SPECIALTOTHEWASHIMGTONTIMES ' Pentagon analysts believe Rus sia's Federal Counterintelligence Service has deployed a new covert squad assigned to assassinate leaders of the ethnic Chechen re bellion. The sources say they believe the •secret assassination unit scored its first success a month ago with an attack on Sultan Geliskhanov, head of the Chechen state security apparatus. Mr. Geliskhanov is said to have been seriously wounded and perhaps killed in an attack in the Degstani region of Kha- savyurt. Other targets on the unit's "pri ority hit hst" reportedly include Chechen President Dzhokhar Dudayev and Vice President Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev. President Dzhokhar Dudayev is A Pentagon source, speaking on on the "priority hit list." the condition of anonymity, said the assassination unit was formed about two months ago after intelli Russia finds it hard to jettison gence officials determined the these extraconstitutional meth war in Chechnya could drag on for ods. They have a long history of as long as five years. special operations. It comes as no The source said Russian offi surprise this is being employed in cials moved quickly to activate the Chechnya," unit of 40 to 50 trained comman "I'm surprised the Russians dos, some of whom previously haven't done it sooner," said John served as Soviet Spetsnaz troops Lenczowski, director of the Insti oras KGB or GRU (military intel tute of World Politics in Wash ligence) operatives. Many mem ington. "Their efforts against the bers of the assassination squad Chechens have been brutal are believed to have served in enough, one would have suspected Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Khasavyurt Accord Background Paper
    KA Khasavyurt Accord Committee: Khasavyurt Accord Situation: The Chechen-Russian Conflict (December 1994-August 1996) Written By: Romina Pérez I. Specialized Committee A specialized committee focuses on a specific situation, rather than broad themes or topics. A specialized committee is often categorized by its own protocol and is usually unique to every simulation. Participants in a specialized committee will have very specific roles and are encouraged to study a single person’s point of view on the assigned situation, rather than a whole country’s general point of view. During ISRMUN, participants in the Khasavyurt Accord are referred to as representatives. These participants represent a member of the Russian or Chechen government during the Chechen-Russian Conflict between December 1994 and August 1996. Moreover, specialized committees are recognized for being relatively small, which allows the debate to flow smoothly, as there are only a few participants debating or discussing ideas. It is important to note that specialized committees can be significantly more challenging than regular committees, and require a more thorough research process. II. Quorum Chechens • Akhmed Zakayev • Aslan Maskhadov • Dokka Umarov • Dzhokhar Dudayev • Salman Raduyev • Vakha Arsanov • Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev Russians • Alexander Lebed • Anatoly Kulikov • Boris Yeltsin • Lev Rokhlin • Pavel Grachev • Viktor Chernomyrdin • Vladimir Shamanov III. The Situation A. Background on the Topic The Chechen–Russian conflict is an ongoing, centuries-long dispute over religious freedom, self-determination and cultural preservation. The Chechens are a Northeast Caucasian ethnic group native to the North Caucasus in Eastern Europe. The majority of Chechens are Muslims and live in the Checheno-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republica (also known as Chechnya), an autonomous republic within the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Caucasus on the Brink
    IntERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND SECURITY NETWORK THE NORTH CAUCASUS ON THE BRINK Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich IntERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND SECURITY NETWORK THE NORTH CAUCASUS ON THE BRINK Jeronim Perovic Senior Researcher Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich TABLE OF CONTEntS Summary ..........................................................................................................................4 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 6 Peoples, Territory and Languages .................................................................................7 A History of Violence ....................................................................................................10 The Chechen Factor and the Spread of War ...............................................................13 The North Caucasus as a Conflict Zone ...................................................................... 16 The Dagestani Theater of War .................................................................................... 18 Moscow’s Assessment of the Situation ..................................................................... 19 Cadre Policy and Territorial Reorganization ............................................................. 20 Military Build-Up and a New Policy on Islam ............................................................22 The Consequences of “Chechenization” ....................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • HOMO JIHADICUS Islam in the Former USSR and the Phenomenon of the Post-Soviet Militants in Syria and Iraq
    HOMO JIHADICUS ISLAM IN THE FORMER USSR AND THE PHENOMENON OF THE POST-SOVIET MILITANTS IN SYRIA AND IRAQ Maciej Falkowski, Józef Lang WARSAW SEPTEMBER 2015 HOMO JIHADICUS ISLAM IN THE FORMER USSR AND THE PHENOMENON OF THE POST-SOVIET MILITANTS IN SYRIA AND IRAQ Maciej Falkowski, Józef Lang © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITORS Adam Eberhardt, Krzysztof Strachota EDITOR Halina Kowalczyk CO-OPERATION Katarzyna Kazimierska, Anna Łabuszewska TRANSLATION Józef Lang CO-OPERATION Nicholas Furnival GRAPHic DESigN PARA-bucH ILLUSTRATiON ON COVER Józef Lang DTP GroupMedia MAPS Wojciech Mańkowski PUBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw Tel. + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-62936-70-0 Contents KEY POINTS /5 INTRODUCTION /8 I. FROM THE RETURN TO FAITH TO JIHAD: SALAFISM AND MILITANT ISLAM IN THE POST-SOVIET AREA /11 1. Soviet and post-Soviet Islam /11 2. Salafism in the post-Soviet area /15 3. Militant Islam after the fall of the USSR /19 II. ORIGINS OF THE INFLUX OF VOLUNTEERS TO SYRIA /26 1. Ideological reasons /27 2. Exceptionality of Syria in the Muslim perception /29 3. Jihadist propaganda /30 4. Political reasons in the countries of origin /31 5. Solidarity with co-believers and religious duty /31 6. Personal motivations. Social causes /33 7. War as a way of life /35 III. PROFILE OF THE POST-SOVIET MILITANTS IN SYRIA AND IRAQ /37 1. Size and ethnic composition /37 2.
    [Show full text]