DOCSLIB.ORG

Attachment File.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attachment File.Pdf 計画系 718 号 日本建築学会計画系論文集 第80巻 第718号，2923-2933， 2015年12月 【カテゴリーⅠ】 J. Archit. Plann., AIJ, Vol. 80 No. 718, 2923-2933, Dec., 2015 DOI http://doi.org/10.3130/aija.80.2923 サンボー・プレイ・クック遺跡群にみる初期クメール建築の多様性 DIVERSITYࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡ㑇㊧⩌࡟ࡳࡿึᮇࢡ࣓࣮ࣝᘓ⠏ࡢከᵝᛶ OF THE PRIMITIVE KHMER ARCHITECTURE IN SAMBOR PREI KUK DIVERSITY OF THE PRIMITIVE下 田 KHMER 一 太＊，中 ARCHITECTURE 川 武＊＊ IN SAMBOR PREI KUK Ichita SHIMODA and Takeshi NAKAGAWA ୗ⏣ ୍ኴ 㸪୰ᕝṊ Ichita SHIMODA and Takeshi NAKAGAWA In this paper, we attempted to classify the architectural style of brick shrines at the Sambor Prei Kuk monuments that is located in the central area of Cambodia and is recognized as the largest architectural complex in the Pre-Angkor period. A total of 28 brick shrines which are relatively well conserved in this group of monuments were selected and analyzed from several points of view; form of plan, interior form and layout of the pedestal in main chamber, form and roo�ng structure of antechamber, form of elevation, and form of corbel arch roo�ng of main chamber. As a result of above analysis, it was clari�ed that the variety of the architectural forms are mixed and irregularly arranged in this group of monuments. Diversi�ed style of brick shrines in the Pre-Angkor disappeared after the commencement of Angkor period in the 9th century. Architectural style of brick shrines was standardized in the Angkor period; thereafter the main construction material for the major structures in temple complex shifted from brick to sandstone in the beginning of the 11th century. The peak of brick architectures was reached in the Pre-Angkor period, and it was the most outstanding expression through design, structure, and construction technique in the shrines at the Sambor Prei Kuk. Keywords: Southeast Asia, Cambodia, Pre-Angkor, Brick structure, ISANAPURA ᮾ༡࢔ࢪ࢔㸪࢝ࣥ࣎ࢪ࢔㸪ࣉ࣭ࣞ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝ㸪↢⎰㑇ᵓ㸪࢖࣮ࢩࣕࢼࣉࣛ 1. ࡣࡌࡵ࡟ 㸦V. Goloubew㸧࡟ࡼࡿ1927ᖺࡢⓎ᥀ㄪᰝ3㸧ࡢ⤖ᯝࢆ⿵㊊ࡍࡿᘓ⠏┠ ࠉࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡࡣᮾ༡࢔ࢪ࢔ࡢึᮇ㞟ᶒᅜᐙࡢ୍ࡘ࡛࠶ 㘓ࢆ1935ᖺ࡟㏣⿵ࡋࡓ4㸧ࠋࣃ࣐ࣝࣥࢸ࢕࢚࡟ࡼࡿࡇࢀࡽ୍㐃ࡢ◊✲ ࡿࢳ࢙ࣥࣛ⋤ᮅࡢ⋤㒔࢖࣮ࢩࣕࢼࣉࣛ࡟ẚᐃࡉࢀࡿ㑇㊧⩌࡛࠶ࡿࠋ㸵 ᡂᯝࡣ㸪ࣉ࣭ࣞ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝᮇࡢᘓ⠏ࢆ⥙⨶ࡋࡓ၏୍ࡢ㈨ᩱ࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ ୡ⣖ึ㢌࡟᭱┒ᮇࢆ㏄࠼ࡓ࡜⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿࡇࡢ⋤㒔ࡣ㸪ᮾᆅ༊࡟ከᩘ ࠉᮏ✏ࡣࣃ࣐ࣝࣥࢸ࢕࢚ࡢᡂᯝࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼㸪㏆ᖺ➹⪅ࡽ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㐍ࡵࡽ ࡢ↢⎰㐀㑇ᵓࡼࡾ࡞ࡿࣄࣥࢻ࣮ࢗᩍᑎ㝔⩌ࢆ㓄ࡋ㸪すᆅ༊࡟ࡣ୍㎶ ࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ⌧ᆅㄪᰝࡢ⤖ᯝࢆࡶ࡜࡟㸪ࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡ㑇㊧⩌ ⣙2kmࡢ᪉ᙧࡢ㒔ᇛᆅ༊ࢆᵓ࠼ࡿࠋᮾᆅ༊࡟ࡣ㸪Prasat Sambor㸦໭ᑎ ࡢ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࡢᘓ⠏ᙧᘧ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ศᯒࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ㏆ᖺࡢㄪᰝ࡛ 㝔㸧㸪Prasat Yeai Poeun㸦༡ᑎ㝔㸧㸪Prasat Tao㸦୰ኸᑎ㝔㸧ࢆ୰ᚰ࡜ ᪂ࡓ࡟グ㘓ࡉࢀࡓ㑇ᵓࡶከࡃ㸪ࡇࢀࡲ࡛࡟ィ133ࢧ࢖ࢺࢆᩘ࠼ࡿ࡟⮳ ࡋ࡚㸪9ୡ⣖࡟㛤ᮅࡍࡿ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝ⋤ᮅ࡟ඛ❧ࡗ࡚㛤ⰼࡋࡓࣉ࣭ࣞ࢔ ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡽࡢࢧ࢖ࢺࡢ୰࡟ࡣ」ᩘࡢ↢⎰㑇ᵓ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ᵓᡂࡉࢀࡿ」ྜ ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝ᫬௦ࡢ㐀ᙧⱁ⾡ࢆ௦⾲ࡍࡿከᩘࡢᘓ⠏ࡸ᙮ീࡀṧࡉࢀ࡚࠸ ⓗ࡞ᑎ㝔ࡶከࡃྵࡳ㸪ࡑ࠺ࡋࡓ↢⎰㑇ᵓࢆಶู࡟ィᩘࡍࡿ࡜㑇㊧⩌඲ ࡿࠋࡑࢀࡽࡢసရࡣ࢖ࣥࢻள኱㝣ࡼࡾཷᐜࡋࡓⱁ⾡ⓗ≉ᚩࢆⰍ⃰ࡃṧ య࡛ࡢ↢⎰㑇ᵓᩘࡣ291ᇶ࡟ࡢࡰࡿ5㸧ࠋࡓࡔࡋ㸪ከࡃࡢ㑇ᵓࡣᦆയࡀⴭ ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ୍᪉࡛㸪ᚋ࡟࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝ᫬௦ࡢ㐀ᙧⱁ⾡࡬࡜ᒎ㛤ࡍࡿᆅᇦ໬ ࡋࡃ㸪ᔂቯࡋ࡚࣐࢘ࣥࢻ࡜໬ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡶࡢࡶᑡ࡞ࡃ࡞࠸ࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵ㸪 ࡬ࡢⴌⱆࡀㄆࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ ᮏ✏࡛ࡣⰋዲ࡞≧ែ࡛ᘓ⠏ᙧᘧࡢศᯒ࡟㈨ࡍࡿ28ᇶࡢ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽ࡟ᑐ ࠉ1890ᖺ௦࡟㑇㊧⩌ࡀⓎぢࡉࢀ࡚௨᮶㸪ᗄே࠿ࡢࣇࣛࣥࢫே⪃ྂᏛ⪅ ㇟ࢆ⤠ࡾ⪃ᐹࡋࡓ㸦ᅗ1㸧ࠋ ࡀᘓ⠏㑇ᵓࡢグ㏙ࡸ◊✲࡟ྲྀࡾ⤌ࢇࡔࡀ㸪ึࡵ࡚⥙⨶ⓗ࡞ヲ㏙ࢆ㐩ᡂ ࠉࡲࡓ㸪㑇㊧⩌࡟ࡣ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝᮇ௨㝆࡟ᨵኚࡸቑ⠏ࡀຍ࠼ࡽࢀࡓ㑇ᵓ ࡋࡓࡢࡣࣃ࣐ࣝࣥࢸ࢕࢚㸦H. Parmentier㸧࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋᙼࡣࢳࣕࣥࣃᘓ⠏ ࡶㄆࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ㑇㊧⩌ࡢ໭᪉࡟఩⨨ࡍࡿRobang Romeasᑎ㝔⩌ࡸSrei ࡢ◊✲ࢆ⓶ษࡾ࡟㸪࢖ࣥࢻࢩࢼ඲ᇦࡢྂ௦ࣄࣥࢻ࣮࣭ࢗ௖ᩍᘓ⠏ࢆᜳ Krup Leakᑎ㝔⩌࡟ࡶ㸪ẚ㍑ⓗⰋዲ࡞≧ែࡢ㑇ᵓࡀ࠶ࡿࡶࡢࡢ㸪ࡑࢀࡽ ⓙⓗ࡟ㄪᰝࡋ㸪ࡉࡽ࡟ࡣ࢖ࣥࢻᘓ⠏࡟ࡶ◊✲ࢆᒎ㛤ࡋࡓಠ▔ⓗ࡞ぢ㆑ ࡣ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝᮇ࡟ᘓ❧ࡉࢀࡓࡶࡢࡸ㸪ቑᨵ⠏ࡢᡭࡀຍ࠼ࡽࢀࡓ㑇ᵓ࡛ ࢆࡶࡘ㝶୍ࡢ┠฼ࡁ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡ㑇㊧⩌࡟௦⾲ ࠶ࡿࡓࡵ⪃ᐹࡢᑐ㇟እ࡜ࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓ㸪୰ኸᑎ㝔ࡢ୺⚆ᇽ㸦C1㸧ࡣ㸪୸ ࡉࢀࡿࣉ࣭ࣞ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝᮇࡢᘓ⠏ࢆ㸪࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝᮇ࡟ඛ⾜ࡍࡿᘓ⠏ᵝ ᙮ࡢ⊺Ꮚീࡸ⿦㣭ࣜࣥࢸࣝࡢ⨾⾡ᵝᘧ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡁ㸪୍⯡ⓗ࡞Ṕྐ༊ศ࡛ ᘧ࡜ࡋ࡚ࠕึᮇࢡ࣓࣮ࣝᘓ⠏㸦L'art Khmèr Primitif㸧ࠖ࡜࠸࠺᪂ࡓ࡞༊ ࠸࠼ࡤ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝ᭱ึᮇࡢᘓ❧࡜᥎ ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡀ6, 7㸧㸪ᘓ❧ᖺ௦ࡢ᰿ ศࢆࡶࡗ࡚఩⨨࡙ࡅࡓࠋ ᣐࡣ⬤ᙅ࡛ࣉ࣭ࣞ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝᮇ࡟㐳ࡿྍ⬟ᛶࡀ࠶ࡿࡇ࡜㸪ࡲࡓࣃ࣐ࣝ ࠉᙼࡣ1911ᖺ࡟ࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡ㑇㊧⩌࡟࠾ࡅࡿㄪᰝࢆ㛤ጞ ࣥࢸ࢕࢚ࡀࢡ࣮ࣞࣥᒣ୰࡟఩⨨ࡋྠ᫬௦࡜⪃࠼ࡓ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࢆࠕึᮇ ࡋ㸪1913ᖺ࡟ࡣ୺せ࡞㑇ᵓࡢከࡃࢆሗ࿌ࡋࡓ1㸧ࠋࡑࡢᚋ㸪1925ᖺࡢ㏣ ࢡ࣓࣮ࣝᘓ⠏ࠖࡢ୰࡛ㄽࡌࡓ㢸㸦ࡦࡑࡳ㸧࡟ೌࡗ࡚㸪᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࣉ࣭ࣞ ㄪᰝࢆࡶࡗ࡚㸪ᮏ㑇㊧⩌ࡢ⚆ᇽ55ᇶࢆྵࡴࣉ࣭ࣞ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝᮇࡢᘓ⠏ ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝᮇࡢᘓ⠏ᙧᘧ࡟ᙉࡃ౫Ꮡࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ᮏ✏࡛ࡣࡇࢀ ࢆໟᣓࡋࡓグ㘓ࢆከᩘࡢᅗ∧࡜࡜ࡶ࡟㞟ᡂࡋࡓ2㸧ࠋࡉࡽ࡟㸪ࢦࣝ࣋࢘ ࢆ⪃ᐹᑐ㇟࡟ྵࡵࡓࠋ *＊ 筑波኱Ꮫே㛫⥲ྜ⛉Ꮫ◊✲⛉ࠉຓᩍ࣭༤ኈ㸦ᘓ⠏Ꮫ㸧 Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Science, University of Tsukuba, Dr. Architecture 筑波大学人間総合科学研究科 助教・博士（建築学） Assist. Prof., Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Science, University of ** 早稲田大学理工学術院 教授・工博 Prof., SchoolTsukuba, of Science Dr.Arch. and Engineering, Waseda University, Dr. Eng. ＊＊ 早稲田大学理工学術院 教授・工博 Prof., School of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Dr.Eng. ─ 2923 ─ 計画系 718 号 2. ᖹ㠃ᙧᘧ 㢮ࡢᑎ㝔ᙧᘧࡀつᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࢡ࣓࣮ࣝᘓ⠏࡟࠾࠸࡚ᚋ⪅஧ᙧᘧࡣ ࠉ㑇㊧⩌ෆࡢ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࡢᖹ㠃ᙧ≧ࡣࠕṇ᪉ᙧࠖ㸪ࠕዟ⾜ࡁࢆ㛗㍈࡜ ⛥࡛࠶ࡿࡀ㸪ඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ㑇ᵓࡀᙜ㑇㊧⩌࡟」ᩘ࠶ࡿ௚㸪ࣂ࢖ࣚࣥᑎ ࡍࡿ㛗᪉ᙧࠖ㸪ࠕṇඵゅᙧࠖ㸪ࠕᩳ㎶ࡢ▷࠸ඵゅᙧࠖࡢᅄ✀࡟኱ูࡉ 㝔ࡢ୰ኸሪࡣኚ๎ⓗࡔࡀ෇ᙧ⚆ᇽ࡜ぢ೴ࡍࡇ࡜ࡶ࡛ࡁ㸪ࡑࡢ௚➹⪅ࡣ ࢀࡿὀ1㸧㸦⾲1㸧ࠋᘓ≀እቨࡢᖹ㠃ᙧ≧࡜ᐊෆࡢᖹ㠃ᙧ≧ࡣྠㄪࡍࡿࠋ ᐇぢࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡀPhnom Chidos࡜࠸࠺෇ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ↢⎰⚆ᇽࡀሗ࿌ࡉࢀ ࢡ࣓࣮ࣝᘓ⠏ࡢ୰࡛ඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ㑇ᵓࡣᙜ㑇㊧⩌ࡢ௚࡛ࡣ⟶ぢࡢཬࡪ ࡚࠸ࡿ10㸧ࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡟࢖ࣥࢻࡢ୰ୡᘓ⠏᭩࡟グࡉࢀࡓ୕✀㢮ࡢᖹ㠃ᙧ ⠊ᅖ࡛ࡣㄆࡵࡽࢀ࡞࠸ࡀ㸪ᮏ✏࡛ࡢㄪᰝᑐ㇟㑇ᵓࡢ࠺ࡕ㸪N7, S7, S8, ≧ࡀᥞࡗ࡚ㄆࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ S9, S10, S11, Y1ࡢ7⚆ᇽࡀඵゅᙧᖹ㠃࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡑࡢ௚࡟ࡶᮏ㑇㊧⩌࡛ ࠉ㑇㊧⩌ෆࡢ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࡢᖹ㠃つᶍࢆᏊ⣽࡟᥇ᑍࡍࡿ࡜㸪ྛ⚆ᇽࡣಶ ࡣPrasat Tropeang Ropeakࡢ๪⚆ᇽ4ᇶ㸦Z2~Z5㸧࡜㒔ᇛෆࡢKhnach Tol ู࡟␗࡞ࡿᘓ⠏ィ⏬࡟ᇶ࡙࠸࡚࠸ࡓࡇ࡜ࡀ᫂ࡽ࠿࡛࠶ࡿࠋ౛࠼ࡤ㸪໭ ᑎ㝔ෆࡢ2ᇶࡀඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ⚆ᇽ࡛࠶ࡿࠋຍ࠼࡚㸪☜ㄆࡉࢀࡿ⠊ᅖ࡛ ᑎ㝔࡟࠾࠸࡚୺⚆ᇽࢆྲྀࡾᕳ࠸࡚఩⨨ࡍࡿṇ᪉ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ๪⚆ᇽࡸ㸪༡ ࡣඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ⚆ᇽ࡟ࡣ෇ᙧྎᗙࡀᏳ⨨ࡉࢀࡿࡢࡀ୍⯡ⓗ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪 ᑎ㝔ࡢඵゅᙧ⚆ᇽࡣ㸪୍ぢࡋ࡚ྠࡌᙧᘧ㸪つᶍࡢᘓ⠏࡛࠶ࡿࡼ࠺࡟ぢ ୰ኸᑎ㝔ෆ࡛ಽቯࡋࡓ⚆ᇽ࡟ࡣ෇ᙧࡢྎᗙ∦ࡀㄆࡵࡽࢀࡿࡶࡢࡀ࠶ ࠼ࡿࡀ㸪N9࡜N10⚆ᇽࡢᖹ㠃つᶍࡀ࡯ࡰྠᑍ࡛࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ၏୍ࡢ౛እ ࡿࡓࡵ㸪ࡑࢀࡽࡢ⚆ᇽࡶࡲࡓඵゅᙧᖹ㠃࡛࠶ࡗࡓྍ⬟ᛶࡀ❚ࢃࢀࡿࠋ ࡜ࡋ࡚㸪ఞ⸛ࡢ୰࡛ᑐ⛠ⓗ࡞఩⨨࡟㓄ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ⚆ᇽ࡛࠶ࡗ࡚ࡶ㸪ྠ ࠉఞ⸛ෆࡢ⚆ᇽࡢ㓄⨨࡜ᖹ㠃ᙧᘧ࡟᭷ព࡞㛵ಀࡣㄆࡵࡽࢀ࡞࠸ࠋ౛࠼ つᶍࡢ㑇ᵓࡣ࡞࠸ࡢ࡛࠶ࡿ㸦ᅗ2㸧ࠋ ࡤ໭ᑎ㝔ࡢ๪⚆ᇽᅄᇶࡣඵゅᙧ࡜ṇ᪉ᙧࡢᖹ㠃ᙧᘧࡀΰᅾࡋ࡚㓄⨨ࡉ ࠉከࡃࡢ⚆ᇽࡣṇ㠃ࡢࡳ࡟㛤ཱྀࡋ㸪ᡬࢆ⤒࡚୺ᐊ࡟⮳ࡿ๓࡟ᑠ✵㛫㸦 ࢀ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ࡲࡓ༡ᑎ㝔ࡢ๪⚆ᇽ஬ᇶࡣ࠸ࡎࢀࡶඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡔࡀ㸪ṇඵ ๓ᡣ㸧ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ⚆ᇽ࡜┤᥋୺ᐊ࡟⮳ࡿ⚆ᇽ࡜ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ኱༙ࡢ⚆ᇽ࡛ࡣ ゅᙧ࡜ᩳ㎶ࡢ▷࠸ඵゅᙧ⚆ᇽ࡜ࡀΰᅾࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ṇ㠃ࡢ㛤ཱྀ㒊࿘ࡾࡣᙇࡾฟࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪␲ఝⓗ࡟๓ᐊࢆ⾲⌧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸦 ࠉᮾ༡࢔ࢪ࢔ࡢ௖ᩍ࣭ࣄࣥࢻ࣮ࢗᩍࡢ↢⎰㐀ᑎ㝔࡟ど㔝ࢆᗈࡆࡿ࡜㸪 ␲ఝ๓ᐊ㸧ࠋṧࡾࡢྛ㠃࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡶ㸪ቨయ୰ኸࢆእഃ࡟ᙇࡾฟࡋ␲ఝ ඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ⚆ᇽ౛ࡣ࣐ࣞ࢖ࢩ࢔ࡢBujang Valley࡟఩⨨ࡍࡿCandi Bukit ๓ᐊࢆ᭷ࡍࡿࢱ࢖ࣉ࡜㸪␲ఝ๓ᐊࡢ࡞࠸ᖹᆠ࡞ቨయࡢࢱ࢖ࣉ࡟኱ูࡉ Pendiat (Site17)ࡸ㸪ࢱ࢖ࡢU Thong㑇㊧ࡸFa Daet㑇㊧ (Site10)㸪ࡲࡓ࣋ ࢀࡿࠋࢳ࢙ࣥࡣ␲ఝ๓ᐊ࡟ࡼࡿᙇࡾฟࡋ㒊ࡢᵓ㐀ⓗ࡞ព⩏ࢆ㔜どࡋ㸪 ࢺࢼ࣒ࡢBangan㑇㊧➼࡟ᑡᩘ࡞ࡀࡽㄆࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ ࡇࢀࢆࣂࢵࢺࣞࢫ㸦᥍࠼ቨ㸧࡜࿧ࡧ㸪ࣉ࣭ࣞ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝᮇࡢ⚆ᇽ࡟ᑐ ࠉ୰ୡ࢖ࣥࢻࡢᘓ⠏᭩ࢩࣝࣃ࣭ࢩ࣮ࣕࢫࢺࣛ(Shilpa Sastras)ࡢ୰࡛ࡶ ࡋ࡚㸪9ୡ⣖௨㝆ࡢ⚆ᇽ࡛ࡣ␲ఝ๓ᐊࡢᙇࡾฟࡋࡀὸࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪ᨭᣢᵓ㐀 ௦⾲ⓗ࡞࣐࣮ࢼࢧ࣮ࣛ8㸧ࡸ࣐࣐ࣖࢱ9㸧࡛ࡣ⚆ᇽࡢᖹ㠃ᙧ≧࡟ࡘ࠸࡚グ య࡜ࡋ࡚ࡢᙺ๭ࡀῶ㏥ࡋ࡚࠸ࡃࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋࡓ11㸧ࠋࡓࡔࡋ㸪ࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ ㏙ࡉࢀ㸪ࠕṇ᪉ᙧ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ㛗᪉ᙧ(Nagara)ࠖ㸪ࠕභゅᙧ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣඵゅ ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡ㑇㊧⩌ෆࡢ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽ࡟㝈ࡗ࡚ࡶࡇࡢᙇࡾฟࡋᑍἲࡣ ᙧ(Dravida)ࠖࡑࡋ࡚ࠕ෇ᙧ㸪ᴃ෇ᙧ㸪࢔ࣉࢫᙧ(Vesara)ࠖ࡜࠸࠺୕✀ ୍ᵝ࡛ࡣ࡞ࡃ㸪౛࠼ࡤN24⚆ᇽࡢࡼ࠺࡟ᙇࡾฟࡋࡀᴟࡵ࡚ὸ࠸␲ఝ๓ᐊ ࡛ࡣ⿦㣭ⓗ࡞⾲⌧ࢆ୺ࡓࡿ┠ⓗ࡜ࡋ㸪ᵓ㐀ⓗ࡞ᙺ๭ࡣ࡯࡜ࢇ࡝ᮇᚅ࡛ ࡁ࡞࠸㑇ᵓࡀ࠶ࡿ➼㸪ㄪᰝᑐ㇟ࢆᗈࡆࡿࡇ࡜࡛౛እⓗ࡞㑇ᵓࡶྵࡲࢀ ⾲ࠉࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡ㑇㊧⩌ࡢ୺せ࡞↢⎰⚆ᇽ࡜࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ ࣝ᫬௦ࡢ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࡢᘓ⠏ᙧᘧࡢศ㢮㸦๓ᡣࡢᖹ㠃ᙧᘧࡢศ㢮ࡣᅗ 㸪ࣜࣥࢸࣝࡢᯛᩘࡣᅗࢆཧ↷࡟ࡉࢀࡓ࠸ࠋ࡞࠾㸪ṧᏑࡏࡎ☜ㄆ࡛ ࡁ࡞࠸ࡶࡢࡣ ࡜⾲グࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ㸧 6KULQH 3ODQ )LJ $QWHFKDPEHU 5RRI &REHOOLQJ ໭ᑎ㝔 VWHS OLQHDU 1DPH ,'1R VTXDUH )LJ ORZWLHU 6RPDVXWUD KLJKWLHU UHFWDQJOH UHIUDFWLRQ &RGH1R RFWDJRQDO 1XPEHURI/LQWHO 7\SHRISODQ )LJ HTXLODWHUDORFWDJRQDO 1 2 ; 1 2 ; 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 ; 2 2 0 3U6DPERU ୰ኸᑎ㝔 1 2 ; 2 2 1 2 ; 2 2 1 2 ; 2 1 2 2 2 0 1 2 ; 2 2 0 3U&KUH\ 1 2 2 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 ༡ᑎ㝔 0 1 2 2 0 3U6DQGDQ 1 2 ; 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 0 3U/RXQJ&KRP%RN 1 2 ; 2 2 6 2 ; 2 2 6 2 ; 2 2 6 2 ; 2 2 0 3U<HDL3RHXQ 6 2 ; 2 2 6 2 ; 2 6 2 ; 2 6 2 ; 2 2 0 3U7DR & 2 ; 2 2 0 < 2 ; 2 2 ᅗ ࠉࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡ㑇㊧⩌ᑎ㝔ᆅ༊࡟࠾ࡅࡿ」ྜᑎ㝔࡜ 0 3U7URSHDQJ5RSHDN = 2 ; 2 2 1 0 3U.RXNWURXQJ : 2 ; 2 2 ⚆ᇽࡢศᕸ㸦■ࡣᮏ✏࡛ศᯒᑐ㇟࡜ࡋࡓ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࠋT1㸪D2㸪Wࡢ 0 3U7DPRQ 7 2 ; 2 2 0 3U'RQPRQJ ' 2 2 2 ୕⚆ᇽࡣᅗ࡟♧ࡋࡓᆅ༊ࡢእഃ࡟఩⨨ࡍࡿ㸧 $QJNRU3HULRG 2 ; 2 2 2 ─ 2924 ─ ─ 2925 ─ 計画系 718 号 2. ᖹ㠃ᙧᘧ 㢮ࡢᑎ㝔ᙧᘧࡀつᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࢡ࣓࣮ࣝᘓ⠏࡟࠾࠸࡚ᚋ⪅஧ᙧᘧࡣ ࠉ㑇㊧⩌ෆࡢ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࡢᖹ㠃ᙧ≧ࡣࠕṇ᪉ᙧࠖ㸪ࠕዟ⾜ࡁࢆ㛗㍈࡜ ⛥࡛࠶ࡿࡀ㸪ඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ㑇ᵓࡀᙜ㑇㊧⩌࡟」ᩘ࠶ࡿ௚㸪ࣂ࢖ࣚࣥᑎ ࡍࡿ㛗᪉ᙧࠖ㸪ࠕṇඵゅᙧࠖ㸪ࠕᩳ㎶ࡢ▷࠸ඵゅᙧࠖࡢᅄ✀࡟኱ูࡉ 㝔ࡢ୰ኸሪࡣኚ๎ⓗࡔࡀ෇ᙧ⚆ᇽ࡜ぢ೴ࡍࡇ࡜ࡶ࡛ࡁ㸪ࡑࡢ௚➹⪅ࡣ ࢀࡿὀ1㸧㸦⾲1㸧ࠋᘓ≀እቨࡢᖹ㠃ᙧ≧࡜ᐊෆࡢᖹ㠃ᙧ≧ࡣྠㄪࡍࡿࠋ ᐇぢࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࡀPhnom Chidos࡜࠸࠺෇ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ↢⎰⚆ᇽࡀሗ࿌ࡉࢀ ࢡ࣓࣮ࣝᘓ⠏ࡢ୰࡛ඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ㑇ᵓࡣᙜ㑇㊧⩌ࡢ௚࡛ࡣ⟶ぢࡢཬࡪ ࡚࠸ࡿ10㸧ࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡟࢖ࣥࢻࡢ୰ୡᘓ⠏᭩࡟グࡉࢀࡓ୕✀㢮ࡢᖹ㠃ᙧ ⠊ᅖ࡛ࡣㄆࡵࡽࢀ࡞࠸ࡀ㸪ᮏ✏࡛ࡢㄪᰝᑐ㇟㑇ᵓࡢ࠺ࡕ㸪N7, S7, S8, ≧ࡀᥞࡗ࡚ㄆࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ S9, S10, S11, Y1ࡢ7⚆ᇽࡀඵゅᙧᖹ㠃࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡑࡢ௚࡟ࡶᮏ㑇㊧⩌࡛ ࠉ㑇㊧⩌ෆࡢ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࡢᖹ㠃つᶍࢆᏊ⣽࡟᥇ᑍࡍࡿ࡜㸪ྛ⚆ᇽࡣಶ ࡣPrasat Tropeang Ropeakࡢ๪⚆ᇽ4ᇶ㸦Z2~Z5㸧࡜㒔ᇛෆࡢKhnach Tol ู࡟␗࡞ࡿᘓ⠏ィ⏬࡟ᇶ࡙࠸࡚࠸ࡓࡇ࡜ࡀ᫂ࡽ࠿࡛࠶ࡿࠋ౛࠼ࡤ㸪໭ ᑎ㝔ෆࡢ2ᇶࡀඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ⚆ᇽ࡛࠶ࡿࠋຍ࠼࡚㸪☜ㄆࡉࢀࡿ⠊ᅖ࡛ ᑎ㝔࡟࠾࠸࡚୺⚆ᇽࢆྲྀࡾᕳ࠸࡚఩⨨ࡍࡿṇ᪉ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ๪⚆ᇽࡸ㸪༡ ࡣඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ⚆ᇽ࡟ࡣ෇ᙧྎᗙࡀᏳ⨨ࡉࢀࡿࡢࡀ୍⯡ⓗ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪 ᑎ㝔ࡢඵゅᙧ⚆ᇽࡣ㸪୍ぢࡋ࡚ྠࡌᙧᘧ㸪つᶍࡢᘓ⠏࡛࠶ࡿࡼ࠺࡟ぢ ୰ኸᑎ㝔ෆ࡛ಽቯࡋࡓ⚆ᇽ࡟ࡣ෇ᙧࡢྎᗙ∦ࡀㄆࡵࡽࢀࡿࡶࡢࡀ࠶ ࠼ࡿࡀ㸪N9࡜N10⚆ᇽࡢᖹ㠃つᶍࡀ࡯ࡰྠᑍ࡛࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ၏୍ࡢ౛እ ࡿࡓࡵ㸪ࡑࢀࡽࡢ⚆ᇽࡶࡲࡓඵゅᙧᖹ㠃࡛࠶ࡗࡓྍ⬟ᛶࡀ❚ࢃࢀࡿࠋ ࡜ࡋ࡚㸪ఞ⸛ࡢ୰࡛ᑐ⛠ⓗ࡞఩⨨࡟㓄ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ⚆ᇽ࡛࠶ࡗ࡚ࡶ㸪ྠ ࠉఞ⸛ෆࡢ⚆ᇽࡢ㓄⨨࡜ᖹ㠃ᙧᘧ࡟᭷ព࡞㛵ಀࡣㄆࡵࡽࢀ࡞࠸ࠋ౛࠼ つᶍࡢ㑇ᵓࡣ࡞࠸ࡢ࡛࠶ࡿ㸦ᅗ2㸧ࠋ ࡤ໭ᑎ㝔ࡢ๪⚆ᇽᅄᇶࡣඵゅᙧ࡜ṇ᪉ᙧࡢᖹ㠃ᙧᘧࡀΰᅾࡋ࡚㓄⨨ࡉ ࠉከࡃࡢ⚆ᇽࡣṇ㠃ࡢࡳ࡟㛤ཱྀࡋ㸪ᡬࢆ⤒࡚୺ᐊ࡟⮳ࡿ๓࡟ᑠ✵㛫㸦 ࢀ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ࡲࡓ༡ᑎ㝔ࡢ๪⚆ᇽ஬ᇶࡣ࠸ࡎࢀࡶඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡔࡀ㸪ṇඵ ๓ᡣ㸧ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ⚆ᇽ࡜┤᥋୺ᐊ࡟⮳ࡿ⚆ᇽ࡜ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ኱༙ࡢ⚆ᇽ࡛ࡣ ゅᙧ࡜ᩳ㎶ࡢ▷࠸ඵゅᙧ⚆ᇽ࡜ࡀΰᅾࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ṇ㠃ࡢ㛤ཱྀ㒊࿘ࡾࡣᙇࡾฟࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪␲ఝⓗ࡟๓ᐊࢆ⾲⌧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸦 ࠉᮾ༡࢔ࢪ࢔ࡢ௖ᩍ࣭ࣄࣥࢻ࣮ࢗᩍࡢ↢⎰㐀ᑎ㝔࡟ど㔝ࢆᗈࡆࡿ࡜㸪 ␲ఝ๓ᐊ㸧ࠋṧࡾࡢྛ㠃࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡶ㸪ቨయ୰ኸࢆእഃ࡟ᙇࡾฟࡋ␲ఝ ඵゅᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ⚆ᇽ౛ࡣ࣐ࣞ࢖ࢩ࢔ࡢBujang Valley࡟఩⨨ࡍࡿCandi Bukit ๓ᐊࢆ᭷ࡍࡿࢱ࢖ࣉ࡜㸪␲ఝ๓ᐊࡢ࡞࠸ᖹᆠ࡞ቨయࡢࢱ࢖ࣉ࡟኱ูࡉ Pendiat (Site17)ࡸ㸪ࢱ࢖ࡢU Thong㑇㊧ࡸFa Daet㑇㊧ (Site10)㸪ࡲࡓ࣋ ࢀࡿࠋࢳ࢙ࣥࡣ␲ఝ๓ᐊ࡟ࡼࡿᙇࡾฟࡋ㒊ࡢᵓ㐀ⓗ࡞ព⩏ࢆ㔜どࡋ㸪 ࢺࢼ࣒ࡢBangan㑇㊧➼࡟ᑡᩘ࡞ࡀࡽㄆࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ ࡇࢀࢆࣂࢵࢺࣞࢫ㸦᥍࠼ቨ㸧࡜࿧ࡧ㸪ࣉ࣭ࣞ࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ࣝᮇࡢ⚆ᇽ࡟ᑐ ࠉ୰ୡ࢖ࣥࢻࡢᘓ⠏᭩ࢩࣝࣃ࣭ࢩ࣮ࣕࢫࢺࣛ(Shilpa Sastras)ࡢ୰࡛ࡶ ࡋ࡚㸪9ୡ⣖௨㝆ࡢ⚆ᇽ࡛ࡣ␲ఝ๓ᐊࡢᙇࡾฟࡋࡀὸࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪ᨭᣢᵓ㐀 ௦⾲ⓗ࡞࣐࣮ࢼࢧ࣮ࣛ8㸧ࡸ࣐࣐ࣖࢱ9㸧࡛ࡣ⚆ᇽࡢᖹ㠃ᙧ≧࡟ࡘ࠸࡚グ య࡜ࡋ࡚ࡢᙺ๭ࡀῶ㏥ࡋ࡚࠸ࡃࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋࡓ11㸧ࠋࡓࡔࡋ㸪ࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ ㏙ࡉࢀ㸪ࠕṇ᪉ᙧ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ㛗᪉ᙧ(Nagara)ࠖ㸪ࠕභゅᙧ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣඵゅ ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡ㑇㊧⩌ෆࡢ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽ࡟㝈ࡗ࡚ࡶࡇࡢᙇࡾฟࡋᑍἲࡣ ᙧ(Dravida)ࠖࡑࡋ࡚ࠕ෇ᙧ㸪ᴃ෇ᙧ㸪࢔ࣉࢫᙧ(Vesara)ࠖ࡜࠸࠺୕✀ ୍ᵝ࡛ࡣ࡞ࡃ㸪౛࠼ࡤN24⚆ᇽࡢࡼ࠺࡟ᙇࡾฟࡋࡀᴟࡵ࡚ὸ࠸␲ఝ๓ᐊ ࡛ࡣ⿦㣭ⓗ࡞⾲⌧ࢆ୺ࡓࡿ┠ⓗ࡜ࡋ㸪ᵓ㐀ⓗ࡞ᙺ๭ࡣ࡯࡜ࢇ࡝ᮇᚅ࡛ ࡁ࡞࠸㑇ᵓࡀ࠶ࡿ➼㸪ㄪᰝᑐ㇟ࢆᗈࡆࡿࡇ࡜࡛౛እⓗ࡞㑇ᵓࡶྵࡲࢀ ⾲ࠉࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡ㑇㊧⩌ࡢ୺せ࡞↢⎰⚆ᇽ࡜࢔ࣥࢥ࣮ ࣝ᫬௦ࡢ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࡢᘓ⠏ᙧᘧࡢศ㢮㸦๓ᡣࡢᖹ㠃ᙧᘧࡢศ㢮ࡣᅗ 㸪ࣜࣥࢸࣝࡢᯛᩘࡣᅗࢆཧ↷࡟ࡉࢀࡓ࠸ࠋ࡞࠾㸪ṧᏑࡏࡎ☜ㄆ࡛ ࡁ࡞࠸ࡶࡢࡣ ࡜⾲グࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ㸧 6KULQH 3ODQ )LJ $QWHFKDPEHU 5RRI &REHOOLQJ ໭ᑎ㝔 VWHS OLQHDU 1DPH ,'1R VTXDUH )LJ ORZWLHU 6RPDVXWUD KLJKWLHU UHFWDQJOH UHIUDFWLRQ &RGH1R RFWDJRQDO 1XPEHURI/LQWHO 7\SHRISODQ )LJ HTXLODWHUDORFWDJRQDO 1 2 ; 1 2 ; 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 ᅗࠉᮏ✏࡛ศᯒᑐ㇟࡜ࡋࡓ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࡢᖹ㠃ᅗ 1 2 ; 2 2 0 3U6DPERU 㸦ቨయࡢட⿣ࡸഴᩳ࡞࡝ࡢ⤒ᖺኚ໬ࡶᥥ෗ࡋࡓ⌧≧ᅗ㸧 ୰ኸᑎ㝔 1 2 ; 2 2 1 2 ; 2 2 1 2 ; 2 1 2 2 2 0 1 2 ; 2 2 0 3U&KUH\ 1 2 2 2 2 ⾲ࠉቨయ࡟ᙇࡾฟࡋ㒊ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ⚆ᇽ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ⚆ᇽᖹ㠃ᙧᘧ࡜ᒇ⵹❧㠃ᙧᘧࡢ㛵ಀ 0 1 2 2 2 ᖹ㠃䚷 ᒇ⵹䚷 ༡ᑎ㝔 0 1 2 2 3ODQ 5RRI 0 3U6DQGDQ 1 2 ; 2 2 ṇ᪉ᙧ 㛗᪉ᙧ ṇඵゅᙧ ඵゅᙧ 㧗ᒙᘧ పᒙᘧ 0 1 2 2 2 2 6TXDUH 5HFWDQJOH (TXLODWHUDORFWDJRQDO 2FWDJRQDO +LJKWLHU /RZWLHU 0 3U/RXQJ&KRP%RN 1 2 ; 2 2 6 2 ; 2 2 ᖹᆠ䚷1RSURMHFWLRQ 1 6 2 ; 2 2 6 2 ; 2 2 6666 VWHS 16' 666< 66 0 3U<HDL3RHXQ 6 2 ; 2 2 ṇ㠃䛾䜏ᙇ䜚ฟ䛧 66< 6 2 ; 2 )URQWSURMHFWLRQ 6 2 ; 2 VWHSV 111 1 1111 6 2 ; 2 2 3URMHFWLRQ 0 3U7DR & 2 ; 2 2 111 1111 0 < 2 ; 2 2 0 3U7URSHDQJ5RSHDN = 2 ; 2 2 VWHSV 111= 116& 1116 ᅗ1ࠉࢧ࣮࣭ࣥ࣎ࣉࣞ࢖࣭ࢡࢵࢡ㑇㊧⩌ᑎ㝔ᆅ༊࡟࠾ࡅࡿ」ྜᑎ㝔࡜ ᅄ᪉䛻ᙇ䜚ฟ䛧䚷)RXU 0 3U.RXNWURXQJ : 2 ; 2 2 ᙇ䜚ฟ䛧䚷 : &=: VLGHVSURMHFWLRQ ⚆ᇽࡢศᕸ㸦■ࡣᮏ✏࡛ศᯒᑐ㇟࡜ࡋࡓ↢⎰㐀⚆ᇽࠋT1㸪D2㸪Wࡢ 0 3U7DPRQ 7 2 ; 2 2 0 3U'RQPRQJ ' 2 2 2 VWHSV 1 7 17 ୕⚆ᇽࡣᅗ࡟♧ࡋࡓᆅ༊ࡢእഃ࡟఩⨨ࡍࡿ㸧 $QJNRU3HULRG 2 ; 2 2 2 ─ 2924 ─ ─ 2925 ─ 計画系 718 号 ࡿࡇ࡜࡟ࡣ␃ពࡉࢀࡼ࠺ࠋ ෆࡢᵝᏊࡣ୙☜࠿࡞ࡶࡢ࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ྎᗙࡢཎ఩⨨࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡶᐃ ࠉṇ᪉ᙧ࡜㛗᪉ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ⚆ᇽ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ␲ఝ๓ᐊ࡟ࡼࡿቨయ୰ኸࡢᙇ ࠿࡛ࡣ࡞࠸⚆ᇽࡀከ࠸ࠋ ࡾฟࡋࡣ㸪ᘓ≀ࡢṇ㠃ࡢࡳ࡛࠶ࡿࡶࡢ࡜㸪඲ᅄ㠃࡟࠶ࡿሙྜ࡟኱ู ࠉࡑ࠺ࡋࡓ୰㸪ࢯ࣮࣐ࢫ࣮ࢺࣛࡣྎᗙࡢཎ఩⨨ࢆ᥎ ࡍࡿࡓࡵࡢ㔜せ ࡉࢀࡿ㸦⾲2㸧ࠋࡓࡔࡋ㸪N19⚆ᇽࡣṇ㠃࡟ࡶᙇࡾฟࡋࡢ࡞࠸≉␗࡞
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Connecticut College Alumni Magazine, Fall 1974 Connecticut College
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Linda Lear Center for Special Collections & Alumni News Archives Fall 1974 Connecticut College Alumni Magazine, Fall 1974 Connecticut College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/alumnews Recommended Citation Connecticut College, "Connecticut College Alumni Magazine, Fall 1974" (1974). Alumni News. Paper 188. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/alumnews/188 This Magazine is brought to you for free and open access by the Linda Lear Center for Special Collections & Archives at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Alumni News by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. .. .,..... ... ' ... .,-..... '"' .. .~. ' . ..... .' " ~.. - .,- ~il -,'; .. .- - • , -; " ... Connecticut College Alumni Magazine VOLUME 51, NUMBER 4, FALL 1974 The Ames Way: Introducing Our New President by Allen Carroll '73 2 At Home With Power Helen F. Mulvey 7 Home: Love Is All You Need David Case II History in Your Own Backyard: A Study of Homes Carol Broggini Catlin '60 12 The House You Call Home Sarah W. Wing '53 14 Homes For Sale-Real Estate, Everyone's Career Lotta Hess Ackerman '28 17 Sharing the Experience Katherine Meili Anderton '40 18 ROUND&ABOUT 22 In the Mailbox 25 What Do the Following Occupations Have in Common? 25 Class Notes Marion Vibert Clark '24 28 List of Class Correspondents 44 COVER: Rita Daly M.A. '71 PHOTOGRAPHS AND ILLUSTRATIONS: pp. 1,2 Constance Avery-Clark '75: pp. 3, 4, 5, 6 the Oakes Ames family: pp. [4, 15 Rita Daly '71: p.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Sambor Prei Kuk: an Interactive Learning Tool
    Virtual Sambor Prei Kuk: An Interactive Learning Tool Daniel MICHON Religious Studies, Claremont McKenna College Claremont, CA 91711 and Yehuda KALAY Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning The Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Haifa 32000, Israel ABSTRACT along the trade routes from its Indic origins into Southeast Asia—one of the great cultural assimilations in human history. MUVEs (Multi-User Virtual Environments) are a new media for researching the genesis and evolution of sites of cultural Much of this important work has, so far, remained the exclusive significance. MUVEs are able to model both the tangible and province of researchers, hidden from the general public who intangible heritage of a site, allowing the user to obtain a more might find it justifiably interesting. Further, the advent of dynamic understanding of the culture. This paper illustrates a immersive, interactive, Web-enabled, Multi-User Virtual cultural heritage project which captures and communicates the Environments (MUVEs) has provided us with the opportunity interplay of context (geography), content (architecture and to tell the story of Sambor Prei Kuk in a way that can help artifacts) and temporal activity (rituals and everyday life) visitors experience this remarkable cultural heritage as it might leading to a unique digital archive of the tangible and intangible have been in the seventh-eighth century CE. MUVEs are a new heritage of the temple complex at Sambor Prei Kuk, Cambodia, media vehicle that has the ability to communicate cultural circa seventh-eighth century CE. The MUVE is used to provide heritage experience in a way that is a cross between a platform which enables the experience of weaved tangible and filmmaking, video games, and architectural design.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Indian Architecture Pdf
    History of indian architecture pdf Continue Ancient Indian architecture In the Great Chaitya Buddhist Karla Caves in Maharashtra, India, c. 120 CEKailasa Temple, Ellora, largest rock-cut Hindu temple[1] Ancient Indian architecture is the architecture of the Indian sub-continent from the Indian Bronze Age to around 800 CE. At its endpoint, Buddhism in India was greatly diminished, and Hinduism was predominant, and religious and secular building styles had taken forms, a great regional variation, which they largely survived until and after the major changes that result from the arrival of the first Islam, and then the Europeans. Much of the early Indian architecture was wood, which is almost always dilapidated or burned, or brick, which is often taken away for reuse. The large number of Indian stone cutting architecture, which begins essentially around 250 BC, is therefore particularly important, as much of it clearly adapts the forms of modern built-up buildings, examples of which do not have. There are also several important sites where the floor plan has survived being excavated, but the upper part of the structures have disappeared. In the Bronze Age, the first cities emerged from the civilization of the Indus Valley. Archaeology has unearthed the urbanization phase at the beginning of the Tharappan kalibangan late Harappan phase, when urbanization declined, but was preserved in some pockets. Urbanization on the Gangetic plains began as early as 1200 BC, emerging as fortified cities and the appearance of northern black polished products. [2] [a] Europe [4] The Mahajanapada period was characterised by Indian coins and the use of stone in Indian architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mayas a Transplanted Indian Civilization
    THE MAYAS A TRANSPLANTED INDIAN CIVILIZATION by Alain Verdier In several speeches given between 1979 and 1988, indian philosopher and historian P.R. Sarkar made startling revelaons concerning the Mayan civilizaBon. According to him, the Mayan civilizaBon was a « transplanted Indian civilizaBon. It went From South India to Central America during the Chola, Pandya and Pallava dynasBes oF the Indian Middle Ages. » He specifically indicated that it first migrated to Central America during the rule oF the Pallavas. This period corresponds to the Classic Period oF the Mayan civilizaBon (4th to 10th century) which also sees a peak in large-scale construcBons and urbanism. Due to the contacts between India and America, many centuries beFore the discovery oF that conBnent by Christopher Colombus, the Indian and the transplanted Mayan civilizaBon existed side by side. Sarkar actually explained that ‘Mayadviipa’ (Mayan island), the Sanskrit name For America, came From the name oF the Mayan civilizaBon. However, while the Indians had invented the wheel several millenia beFore, the Mayas lagged behind due to the Fact that they never knew its use. Sarkar once pointed out that a true civilizaBon must have Four signs oF progress : agriculture, wheel, dress and script. According to him, many old civilizaBons disapeared From the annals oF history because they simply could not invent the wheel and could not make carts and chariots. It was For that very reason that the Mayan civilizaBon had its downFall and was Forced in subsequent Bmes to concede deFeat at the hands oF other civilizaBons. This was, he said « due to some slight deFect.
    [Show full text]
  • SAMBOR PREI KUK, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE Representing the Cultural LANDSCAPE of Ancient Ishanapura
    KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING MINISTRY OF CULTURE AND FINE ARTS SAMBOR PREI KUK, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE Representing the Cultural LANDSCAPE of Ancient Ishanapura PROPOSAL FOR MANAGEMENT PLAN Cambodian National Commission for UNESCO Comprehensive Cultural Heritage Conservation Management Plan (SPK-CCHCMP) Table of Contents Executive Summary Chapter 1: Methodology Page 09 Chapter 2: Contemporary Management Page 26 Chapter 3: Conservation and Management Page 30 Chapter 4: Policy Page 45 Chapter 5: Management Plan Page 64 Chapter 6: Implementation Page 93 Bibliography Page 99 Annexes EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State Party Kingdom of Cambodia State, Province, Region Kampong Thom province, commune of Sambor, and district of Prasat Sambor Name of Property Sambor Prei Kuk Archaeological Site Representing the Cultural Landscape of Ancient Ishanapura Geographic coordinates to the nearest second Point Zero: WGS84E 503808 - N 1423012. Point Zero is situated on the point at the approximate center of Prasat Tao Group or Central Group (C) of the much larger Sambor Prei Kuk Archaeological Site Representing the Cultural Landscape of Ancient Ishanapura Textual description of the boundary of the nominated property The 1354.2ha is located on the west bank of the Steung Sen (river) in an area that contains lowlands, a marsh, and plateau. The entire property is situated on a gentle incline from north to south in a relatively flat area with an elevation of 2 m to 10 m. Small rivers punctuate the lower areas. The place is a mixture of rice paddy, tropical forest, and subsistence habitation. The area comprises the cultural site of Sambor Prei Kuk Archaeological Group established by the Reform of the Royal Decree of 24 December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Name: ______History Channel
    Hi. I’m Peter Weller for the Name: _____________________ History Channel. Join me while we explore Engineering An Empire: Ancient Greece. Greece Introduction ~ Themistocles 1. What is the greatest empire the world has ever known that lies just outside of Greece? 2. Who is the one Greek poised and ready for battle against Persia? 3. What is a self-contained, self-reliant mini country within Greece? 4. What is the offensive weapon of the Trireme? How fast could it go (knots)? 5. Some historical sources claim that the Persians lost as many as _______ ships to the Greeks _______. Mycenaean Civilization 6. According to myth, Agamemnon’s epic struggles were written down by ____________, in two of history’s most famous tales, The Iliad & the Odyssey. 7. What was the fate of Agamemnon when he returned home from the Trojan War? 8. For all the inspiring visuals, nothing comes closer than what colossal main entrance to the citadel? 9. What is the little trick that allows for the corbel arch? 10. What was the corbel dome used for? The Tyrant Polycrates 11. Around 540 BC a tyrant named Polycates came to rule what island? 12. What problem did Polycrates set about to solve the that plagued many cities in the arid climate? 13. The floors of each tunnel connected with only __________ difference between them; a discrepancy of only _______ of a percent. 14. What did the Persians do to Polycrates when they thought he was getting too much autonomy? Pericles and the Golden Age 15. What everlasting monument is Pericles everlasting legacy? 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Survey of Sambor Prei Kuk66 号 (KUBO153 ～ 168Andページ， NAGUMO)2018 年 3 月 153
    早稲田大学 教育・総合科学学術院 学術研究（人文科学・社会科学編）第Geographical Survey of Sambor Prei Kuk66 号 (KUBO153 ～ 168andページ， NAGUMO)2018 年 3 月 153 Geographical Survey of Sambor Prei Kuk ̶ A World Heritage Archaeological Site in Cambodia ̶ Sumiko KUBO1) and Naoko NAGUMO2)3) Geographical survey of Sambor Prei Kuk Archaeological Site started in 1999 by S. Kubo in cooperation with late Dr. Y. Kojo (archaeology), Prof. T. Nakagawa (Architecture) and Cambodian Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts. N. Nagumo joined from 2004. Our main results are as follows: 1) Monuments and relics were mapped by using aerial photos and ground reconnaissance with GPS. 2) Geomorphological map of the area was made by interpreting of stereo pairs of aerial photos and ground survey. 3) Stratigraphy of subsurface deposits was researched by manual and mechanical drillings. 4) Landform evolution of the Stung Sen River lowland was revealed by drillings and radiocarbon (14C) dating of deposits. 5) Archaeological stratigraphy was detected by radiocarbon dating of samples. 6) We published these results in international journals. 1. Introduction Sambor Prei Kuk is a recently registered UNESCO World Heritage site of Pre-Angkor capital (7th Century), located 20 km northeast of Kampong Thom city in Central Cambodia (Photos 1 and 2). It is about 140 km southeast from Siem Reap, the center of the 9th to 15th century Angkor dynasty. Sambor Prei Kuk site is located on an upland along the lower Stung Sen River, a tributary of Lake Tonle Sap (Fig.1). Hindu temple complexes, city moats, and several other engineering works have been found at the site (Kojo and Kubo, 2003; Nagumo et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Typology and Origins of the Hindu-Buddhist Candis Which Were Built from 8Th to 17Th Centuries in the Island of Bali
    計画系 642 号 【カテゴリーⅠ】 日本建築学会計画系論文集 第74巻 第642号，1857-1866，2009年 8 月 J. Archit. Plann., AIJ, Vol. 74 No. 642, 1857-1866, Aug., 2009 MORPHOLOGICAL TYPOLOGY AND ORIGINS OF THE MORPHOLOGICALHINDU-BUDDHIST TYPOLOGY CANDI ANDARCHITECTURE ORIGINS OF THE HINDU-BUDDHIST CANDI ARCHITECTURE IN BALI ISLAND IN BALI ISLAND バリ島におけるヒンドゥー・仏教チャンディ建築の起源と類型に関する形態学的研究 �������������������������������������� ＊１ ＊２ ＊３ I WayanI Wayan KASTAWAN KASTAWAN * ,¹, Yasuyuki Yasuyuki NAGAFUCHINAGAFUCHI * ² and and Kazuyoshi Kazuyoshi FUMOTO FUMOTO * ³ イ �ワヤン ��� カスタワン ��������，永 渕 康���� 之，麓 �� 和 善 This paper attempts to investigate and analyze the morphological typology and origins of the Hindu-Buddhist candis which were built from 8th to 17th centuries in the island of Bali. Mainly, the discussion will be focused on its characteristics analysis and morphology in order to determine the candi typology in its successive historical period, and the origin will be decided by tracing and comparative study to the other candis that are located across over the island and country as well. As a result, 2 groups which consist of 6 types of `Classical Period` and 1 type as a transition type to `Later Balinese Period`. Then, the Balinese candis can also be categorized into the `Main Type Group` which consists of 3 types, such as Stupa, Prasada, Meru and the `Complementary Type Group` can be divided into 4 types, like Petirthan, Gua, ������ and Gapura. Each type might be divided into 1, 2 or 3 sub-types within its architectural variations. Finally, it is not only the similarities of their candi characteristics and typology can be found but also there were some influences on the development of candis in the Bali Island that originally came from Central and East Java.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide
    Teacher’s Guide Visit www.OdysseyEarth.com to access our supplementary short videos The First Americans If you go back in time 15 or 20 thousand years, the Americas looked much different than they do today. First of all, the climate was different. This was towards the end of the Pleistocene epoch. Glaciers covered as much as 30 percent of the Earth’s land. It was cooler, drier, and massive animals like mammoths, giant sloths and saber-toothed cats roamed. Sea levels were also much lower, exposing a strip of land that connected Siberia with Alaska. This is referred to as the Bering Land Bridge, and for a small window of geologic history, before the climate began to warm and sea levels rose again, it was possible for humans to cross from Asia into a new continent. Most anthropologists believe that humans crossing this land bridge were the first Americans, and they quickly spread throughout North, Central and South America. The Maya The Early Maya The first Americans were hunter-gatherers. As the climate began to warm, as early as 7,000 BC, Native Americans in Central America began to domesticate plants. Corn, squash, beans, chiles, tomatoes, cacao, avocados…these are all staple foods that we rely on today, and all are plants that had been selectively bred and thereby domesticated over time by ancient farmers in Central America. 1 The shift towards agriculture and the domestication of plants allowed early Americans to settle down; to “put down roots” rather than live a nomadic life. In the Yucatan Peninsula, these early farmers began to come together into complex societies around 2,000 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Angkorian Communities in the Middle Mekong Valley (Laos and Adjacent Areas) Michel Lorrillard
    Pre-Angkorian Communities in the Middle Mekong Valley (Laos and Adjacent Areas) Michel Lorrillard To cite this version: Michel Lorrillard. Pre-Angkorian Communities in the Middle Mekong Valley (Laos and Adjacent Areas). Nicolas Revire. Before Siam: Essays in Art and Archaeology, River Books, pp.186-215, 2014, 9786167339412. halshs-02371683 HAL Id: halshs-02371683 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02371683 Submitted on 20 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. hek Thak Thakhek Nakhon Nakhon Phanom Phanom Pre-Angkorian Communities in g Fai g g Fai n n the Middle Mekong Valley Se Ba Se Se Ba Se Noi Se Se Noi (Laos and Adjacent Areas) That That That Phanom Phanom MICHEL LORRILLARD Laos Laos on on P P Vietnam Se Se Vietnam i i n n het Savannak Savannakhet Se Xang Xo Xang Se Se Xang Xo Introduction Se Champho Se Se Champho Se Bang Hieng Bang Se Se Bang Hieng he earliest forms of “Indianisation” in Laos have not been the Mekong Mekong Se Tha Moak Tha Se Se Tha Moak Tsubject of much research to date. Henri Parmentier (1927: 231, 233-235), when introducing some two hundred sites related to Se Bang Hieng Bang Se Se Bang Hieng “Khmer primitive art” – soon reclassified as “pre-Angkorian art” as being prior to the ninth century – took into account only five such sites located upstream of the Khone falls.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Construction Order of the Major Shrines of Sambor Prei Kuk Based on an Analysis of Bricks
    heritage Article Estimated Construction Order of the Major Shrines of Sambor Prei Kuk Based on an Analysis of Bricks 1, 2, 2, Ichita Shimoda y, Etsuo Uchida y and Kojiro Tsuda * 1 World Heritage Studies, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan 2 Department of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Ohkubo 3-4-1, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 18 June 2019; Accepted: 12 July 2019; Published: 15 July 2019 Abstract: Sambor Prei Kuk is a predominantly brick monument complex identified as Ishanapura, the capital of the Chenla Dynasty, which reached the height of prosperity in the first half of the 7th century. In the east area of this ancient city, the religious area was formed by three temple complexes which are composed of brick shrines and a multiple number of smaller temples with single or a few shrines scattered in the area. One of the challenging issues is to identify the dates and order in which these structures are constructed. Previous studies based on epigraphy and decorative style have estimated a simple dating of the three temple complexes. In this research, 59 major brick structures which are relatively well preserved in this area were analyzed in terms of the size and chemical composition of their component bricks. This analysis revealed that these brick structures can be classified into several groups corresponding to construction stages. The results revealed that the individual shrines in each temple complexes were built in a more complex process than previously stated, and the construction stages of the individual shrines in the vicinity were also identified as an equally complex process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Angkor Wat? Hile Most Tourists in Cambodia Still Make a W Beeline for Angkor Wat, More Discerning Travellers Might Want to Consider Sambor Prei Kuk Instead
    Compass The next Angkor Wat? hile most tourists in Cambodia still make a W beeline for Angkor Wat, more discerning travellers might want to consider Sambor Prei Kuk instead. Located 200km from Phnom Penh, the complex (which translates to “temple in the richness of the forest” in Khmer) received UNESCO World Heritage status this July. Believed to have flourished in the late sixth and early seventh centuries as the capital of the Chenla Kingdom, the site pre-dates Angkor Wat and is notable for the craftsmanship employed in its 100-odd temples. According to UNESCO, “the art and architecture developed here became models for other parts of the region and lay the ground for the unique Khmer style of the Angkor period”. Open daily, Sambor Prei Kuk can be reached via a short detour from Highway 6, which connects Siem Reap and Phnom Penh. samborpreikuk.com ANOTHER SIDE TO SIEM REAP Venture beyond the temples of Angkor with this one-day itinerary MARK ANDREWS MARK ANDREWS MORNING AFTERNOON EVENING by Photos Koh Ker Beng Mealea Apsara Theatre Located three hours from Siem Reap, One hour from Koh Ker is Beng Mealea, Head back to town and round off your the 10th-century temple complex of Koh built in the 12th century. Its floor cultural immersion with a Khmer dance Ker is where King Jayavarman IV held plan suggests it may have served as a performance at the Angkor Village court from 928 to 944 AD. It is home prototype for Angkor Wat, but its true Apsara Theatre (Wat Bo Rd).
    [Show full text]