DOCSLIB.ORG

4Th Annual (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4Th Annual (PDF) Fourth CaliforniaIndian Conference Program November 4-6, 1988 International House University of California, Berkeley THE FOURTH CALIFORNIA INDIAN CONFERENCE Co-sponsors: UCB, Departmentof Anthropology UCB, Depanmeni of Linguistics UCB, Program in Native American Studies UCB, Lowie Museum of Anthropology Program Comminee: Lowell Bean Rohen Black LoeDavis Leanne Hinton Kent Lightfoot Malcolm Margolin William Simmons, Chair Registration: On-site registrationwill beginat 7:30 A.M. on November4. 5, and 6 in the lobby to the International House auditorium. Registrationfees are $25.00regular and $15.00 studenL Native Americans are registered free. Note 10 Participants: Because of unprecedented interest this year, we found it necessary to schedule double sessions on Friday and Saturday. Moderators should be careful 10 keep symposia within the designated timeframe, and individuals who present volunteeredpapers will beexpected to observethe 30 minute time limit (approximately 20 minutes for the paper, and 10 minutes for discussion). Program Friday,November 4 7:30-5:30 Regisiration Auditorium Friday A.M. 7:55 Welcome, William S. Simmons, Program Chair (U.C. Berkeley). Section 1 Symposium: Northwesl California. Lee Davis (U.C. Berkeley) and Byron Nelson, Jr. (Hupa Tribe):Moderators. 8:00 Margot Schevi/1 (Brown University): Lila M. O'Neale: Ethnoaesthetics and the Y'urok-KarokWeavers of Nonhem California. 8:30 tee Davis(U.C. Berkeley): Time Keeping and the Hupa Calendar. 9:00 Thomas Bui:k/ey (University of MassachusettS, Boston): Nonhwest California and Kroeber'·sTheory of Culture Areas. 9:30 Byron Nels011, Jr. (Hupa Tribe): The Division of the HoopaValley Indian Reservation. I0:00 Break Section n. Lee Davis (U.C. Berkeley): Moderator. 10:30 Sara Lovell ('All Tribes' Counselling Center, Mariposa) and Tressa Prael ('All Tribes' Counselling Center, Mariposa): The Interfacing of Two Value Systems: Indian ru1d Non­ Indian People Work.ingTogether. 11:00 Steve Jerome-Wyatt (Affiliated Obsidian Nation): The Little School by ihe River: The AffiliatedObsidian Nation,the Indian Creek.Hydro-Project, and the "Injun Jim" School. -2- 11:30 lose Ignacio Rivera (Apache, Huichol, Nahuatl): Repatriation: A Moral, Ethical, and Constirutional Dilemma for California. Home Room Friday A.M. Section III Svmposium: Isabel Kelly's Notes on the Coast Miwok. Grace Buzaljko (U.C. Berkeley): Moderator. I 0:30 Sylvia Thalman (San Rafael, CA): What, Why, How and Where's the Money Coming From? 11 :00 Mary Collier (Mi wok Archaeological Preserve): Problems withPublishing Ethnographic Notes Not Intended for Publication. 11 :30 Grace Buzaljko(U.C. Berkeley): Isabel Kelly's Letters on the Coast Mi wok. Auditorium Friday P.M. Section JV, Leanne Hi111on (U.C. Berkeley): Moderator. l :30, Leanne Hi111on (U.C. Berkeley) and Jean Perry (U.C. Berkeley): lshi's Tales. 2:00 Kathleen M. O'Conner (NationalArchives): Federal Records Documenting California Indians. 2:30 Sylvia 8. Thalman (San Rafael,CA): Paper Trails: Some 19th and 20th Century Sources for Information about California Indian Families. 3:00 Break 3:30 Linda Dick Bissonnene (Fresno MetropolitanMuseum) and Lorrie Planas (Fresno Metropolitan Museum): Strands of Time: A Central CaliforniaRegional Basketry Project. SectionV Symposium: The Sinkyone lnterlribal Wilderness Park Project. Vic1oria Pauerson (Ethnographic Consultant, State Coastal Conservancy and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians): Moderator. 4:00-5:30 Priscilla Humer (Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians; Chairperson, Native American Heritage Commission). RicardoTapia (Yaqui, Interim Director, Sinkyone Intcnribal WildernessCouncil). Coyore (Wailaki, Sinkyone lntertribal Wilderness Council). Vicroria Parrerson (Ethnographic Consultant, State Coastal Conservancy and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians). Richard Gei11ger (Environmen1al Protection Wom1arion Center). Carmen Chrisry (Yokayo Pomo, Ethnographic Interviewer). Judy Fish (Ethnographic Interviewer). Home Room Friday P.M. Section VI,Larry Dawson (U.C. Berkeley): Moderator. J :30 M. Kar Anderson (U.C. Berkeley): Redbud (Cercis Occidentalis): Its Ecology, Use, and Management by the SouthernMiwok and Other California Indian Tribes. 2:00 MargarerMarhewson (U.C. Berkeley}: Contemporary Basketry and the Availability of Native Fiber Plants. 2:30 Judirh Polanich (U.C. Davis): StringBasketry. -3- 3:00 Break Section Vil, Roben Black (U.C. Berkeley): Moderator. 3:30 Richard Hirchcock (U.C. Berkeley): Ramona: A Protest Novel of SouthernCalifornia. 4:00 Carolyn Alvord (U.C. Berkeley): HubenHowe Bancroft'sDepiction of Indiansin CaliforniaHistory. 4:30 Tom Pinkson (Insti1u1e of Attitudinal Healing. Tibwon): The Coyote Runs Throughthe Camp of the People of the Anglos. 5:00 Marjorie Cummins(Hanford, CA): Songs of the Tachis. Friday Night Plenary Session Auditorium Section vm. Symposium: Issues in California Indian Education. Vicroria Pauerson (Willits SchoolDistrict) and Bev Ortiz (Miwok Archaeological Preserveof Marin), Moderators. 7:30-10:00 David Risfing(Hoopa Valley Tribe,U.C. Davis). Charles Vnaerwood(U.C. Berkeley). Jackie Frank (Point Arena Pomo, Singer). AndyAndreoli (StateDepartment of Education) LP�Davis (U.C. Berkeley). FrankTuttle (Yuki, Wailaki, ConcowMaidu, Artist). KarhJeen Smirh (Bodega Miwok and Dry Oeek Pomo,Pt Reyes National Seashore). Bev Ortiz (East Bay Regional Park District,Columnist, Newsfrom Narive Cafifornia). Vicroria Paaerson (Willits SchoolDistrict). Saturday,November 5 Auditorium Saturday A.M. SectionIX Symposium: Critical Issues: Archaeology, Ethnography, and the Native American Community, LcweU J. Bean (Hayward State University): Moderator. 8:00-10:00 Lcwe/1 J. Bean (Hayward State University): lncroductoryRemarks. Clay Singer (Santa Monica, CA): California ArchaeologyIs Not Anthropology. Chesrer King (Topanga,CA): California Archaeology,the White Man's Burden. WeldonJohnson, Sr. (Colorado Indian TribesMuseum): An AmericanIndian's View of the Conductof ArchcologistsWorking with the Native American Communities. Dororhea Theodorarus(Sacramento State University): Discussant. 10:00 Break Sec1ion X, Kem Lightfoot(U.C. Berkeley): Modera1or. 10:30 £. Breck Parkman (California StaieDepartment of Parks and Recreation):Sacred Mountain Thought. 11 :00 Jose Ignacio Rivera(Apache, Huichol, Nahuatl): Father Serra: An Answer 10 an Invitation. I I :30 Ed D. Castillo (Cahuilla, Laytonville SchoolDistrict): "The Most Powerful Witches We Ever Encountered": Serra, the Franciscans, and Indian Resistance in Colonial Hispanic California. Home Room Saturday A.M. Section XI, Mark Pedelry(U.C. Berkeley): Moderator. 8:00 John P. Marr (Fullenon, CA): Recollections by a Scholar and Assistant to Harrington. 8:30 U/lian D. Smirh(Santa Monica, CA): A Founh Inscribed Chumash Basket with a Design from a Spanish Colonial Coin. 9:00 Mark Pedelry(U.C. Berkeley):The New Mission System: CaliforniaMission Restorations and Museums asIdeology. 9:30 John Pryor (Copperopolis, CA): Defining the EthnographicPeriod for the Pomo. 10:00 Break Section Xll. Tim Buckley (U. Massachusetts, Boston): Moderator. 10:30 Kari Forbes (Chico State University): Oakonitupeh: Traditional Heroof the Concow Maidu 11 :00 Richard Burrill (Carmichael, CA): Spiritual Legacy of the Maidu-NisenanIndians. 11:30 Emily Chavez-Haack (San Francisco State University): Tuolumne Mi wok. Auditorium Saturday P.M. SectionXill, Lowell Bean (California State University, Hayward): Moderator. 1 :30 GeoffreyL. Gamble (Washington State University): The Origin of Basket Designs-A Modem YokutS Myth? 2:00 Greg Sarris (Stanford University): Who Wrote the California Indians' Story: A Study of California Indian Autobiography. 2:30 Robert M. Laidlaw (U.S. Bureau of Land Management) and LarryMyers (Executive Secretary,Native American Heritage Commission):The First Joint Agency Programin the United States to Address the Cultural Concernsof Native Americans. 3:00 Break Section XfV Symposium: The Consequences of Genocide upon California Indians Past and Present. Jack Norton (Humboldt State University, Hupa Tribe):Moderator. 3:30 Jack Norton (Humboldt State University, Hupa Tribe):California Indians as Victims. 4:00 Patricia Tswenaldin (Httpa-i-ribe): When Archetypal Images are Lost, Stolen, or Diffused. 4:30 Royal Alsup: The Impact of Genocideupon California Health. ,5:00 Rita McDonald A/sup: Historicaland Contemporary Genocide upon the California Indian Family. .5. Home Room Saturday P.M. Section XV.Robert Black (U.C. Berkeley): Moderator. I :30 N. Jed Riffe:Report on the Ishi Film Project Funded by the NationalEndowment for the Humanities. 2:00 Rosemary Cambra (Muwekma Oltlone Tribe):Our AncestralRemains and Cultural Herirage of the Past... A View from the Costanoan/Ohlone Indians. 2:30 Abel Silvas (Juaneno): Running Grunion Speaks. 3:00 Break Section XVI, Leanne Hinton (U.C. Berkeley): Moderator. 3:30 George H. Phillips (U.C. Riverside): Commerceof the Valley: Indian-White Trade in Mexican California. 4:00 DavidD. Earle (Palmdale,CA): Archaeological and Ethnohistorical Interpretationsof Indian Settlement in the Antelope Valley: Confusion, Controversy,and New Evidence. 4:30 Alice Ander1on (U.C.L.A.): Recent Research on the Kitanemuk Language. 5:00 Ca1herine A. Callaghan (Ohio State University):Practical Onhography for Indian Languages. Reception David W. Peri (Coast Miwok), co-editor of News from Native California,will be hosting a receptionfor Indians at 7:00P.M. in the Atriumof the Anthropology AMex (go down Bancroft Way to the fountain,turn right, cross the open areatowards the northeast.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-Creation of the Tribal Identity On
    From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican Contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 By Kumiko Noguchi B.A. (University of the Sacred Heart) 2000 M.A. (Rikkyo University) 2003 Dissertation Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Native American Studies in the Office of Graduate Studies of the University of California Davis Approved Steven J. Crum Edward Valandra Jack D. Forbes Committee in Charge 2009 i UMI Number: 3385709 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3385709 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Kumiko Noguchi September, 2009 Native American Studies From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 Abstract The main purpose of this study is to show the path of tribal development on the Tule River Reservation from 1776 to 1936. It ends with the year of 1936 when the Tule River Reservation reorganized its tribal government pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A
    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Kawaiisu Basketry
    Kawaiisu Basketry MAURICE L. ZIGMOND HERE are a number of fine basket Adam Steiner (died 1916), assembled at least 1 makers in Kern County, Califomia," 500 baskets from the West, and primarily from wrote George Wharton James (1903:247), "No Cahfornia, but labelled all those from Kern attempt, as far as I know, has yet been made to County simply "Kem County." They may weU study these people to get at definite knowledge have originated among the Yokuts, Tubatula­ as to their tribal relationships. The baskets bal, Kitanemuk, or Kawaiisu. Possibly the they make are of the Yokut type, and I doubt most complete collection of Kawahsu ware is whether there is any real difference in their to be found in the Lowie Museum of Anthro­ manufacture, materials or designs." The hobby pology at the University of Califomia, Berke­ of basket collecting had reached its heyday ley. Here the specimens are duly labelled and during the decades around the turn of the numbered. Edwin L. McLeod (died 1908) was century. The hobbyists were scattered over the responsible for acquiring this collection. country, and there were dealers who issued McLeod was eclectic in his tastes and, unhke catalogues advertising their wares. A Basket Steiner, did not hmit his acquisitions to items Fraternity was organized by George Wharton having esthetic appeal. James (1903:247) James who, for a one dollar annual fee, sent observed: out quarterly bulletins.^ Undoubtedly the best collection of Kern While some Indian tribes were widely County baskets now in existence is that of known for their distinctive basketry, the deal­ Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians
    PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS BY RUTH EARL MERRILL PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS RUTH EARL MERRILL INTRODUCTION In undertaking, as a study in economic botany, a tabulation of all the plants used by the California Indians, I found it advisable to limit myself, for the time being, to a particular form of use of plants. Basketry was chosen on account of the availability of material in the University's Anthropological Museum. Appreciation is due the mem- bers of the departments of Botany and Anthropology for criticism and suggestions, especially to Drs. H. M. Hall and A. L. Kroeber, under whose direction the study was carried out; to Miss Harriet A. Walker of the University Herbarium, and Mr. E. W. Gifford, Asso- ciate Curator of the Museum of Anthropology, without whose interest and cooperation the identification of baskets and basketry materials would have been impossible; and to Dr. H. I. Priestley, of the Ban- croft Library, whose translation of Pedro Fages' Voyages greatly facilitated literary research. Purpose of the sttudy.-There is perhaps no phase of American Indian culture which is better known, at least outside strictly anthro- pological circles, than basketry. Indian baskets are not only concrete, durable, and easily handled, but also beautiful, and may serve a variety of purposes beyond mere ornament in the civilized household. Hence they are to be found in. our homes as well as our museums, and much has been written about the art from both the scientific and the popular standpoints. To these statements, California, where American basketry.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840
    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873 Margaret A
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Masters Theses Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 5-1993 Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873 Margaret A. Field University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses Part of the Native American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Field, Margaret A., "Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873" (1993). Graduate Masters Theses. Paper 141. This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENOCIDE AND THE INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA , 1769-1873 A Thesis Presented by MARGARET A. FIELD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies and Research of the Un1versity of Massachusetts at Boston in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS MAY 1993 HISTCRY PROGRAM GENOCIDE AND THE I NDIAN S OF CALIFORNIA, 1769-187 3 A Thesis P resented by MARGARET A. FIELD Approved as to style and content by : Clive Foss , Professor Co - Chairperson of Committee mes M. O'Too le , Assistant Professor -Chairpers on o f Committee Memb e r Ma rshall S. Shatz, Pr og~am Director Department of History ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank professors Foss , O'Toole, and Buckley f or their assistance in preparing this manuscri pt and for their encouragement throughout the project .
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 98/Monday, May 24, 2021/Notices
    27892 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 98 / Monday, May 24, 2021 / Notices 225. Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of 273. Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Commission (‘‘Commission’’) Michigan 274. Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 226. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian 275. Tonto Apache Tribe 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the Community 276. Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla countervailing duty and antidumping 227. Samish Indian Tribe Indians duty orders on certain steel grating from 228. San Carlos Apache Tribe 277. Tulalip Tribes of Washington China would be likely to lead to 229. San Manual Band of Mission 278. Tule River Tribe continuation or recurrence of material Indians 279. Tunica-Biloxi Indians of Louisiana injury to an industry in the United 230. San Pasqual Band of Diegueno 280. Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk States within a reasonably foreseeable Mission Indians Indians time. 231. Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut 281. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Tribe Indians Background 232. Santa Ynez Band of Chumash 282. Twenty-Nine Palms Band of The Commission instituted these Mission Indians Mission Indians reviews on October 1, 2020 (85 FR 233. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe 283. United Auburn Indian Community 61981) and determined on January 4, 234. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa 284. Upper Sioux Community 2021 that it would conduct expedited Indians 285. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe of reviews (86 FR 19286, April 13, 2021). 235. Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians Washington The Commission made these 236. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 286. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe determinations pursuant to section 237.
    [Show full text]
  • A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 9 Issue 2 Time, Movement, and Space: Genocide Article 8 Studies and Indigenous Peoples 10-2015 ‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California Jeremiah J. Garsha University of Cambridge Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Garsha, Jeremiah J. (2015) "‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 9: Iss. 2: 61-75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.9.2.1292 Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol9/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California Acknowledgements The author is grateful to the two anonymous reviewers who strengthened this paper with their careful reading and accurate critiques, to Benjamin Madley who offered valuable feedback on an earlier draft of this paper, and to Jamie Lynnae for her nuanced edits and suggestions. This article is available in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol9/iss2/8 ‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California Jeremiah J. Garsha University of Cambridge Cambridge, United Kingdom Abstract: This article is a microhistory of not only the massacre of the indigenous Pomo people in Clear Lake, California, but also the memorialization of this event.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land
    DRECP Proposed LUPA and Final EIS CHAPTER III.8. CULTURAL RESOURCES III.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES This chapter presents the Affected Environment for the Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) Decision Area and the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) area for cultural resources. These areas overlap, and in the following programmatic discussion are referred to broadly as the “California Desert Region.” More than 32,000 cultural resources are known in the DRECP area in every existing environmental context ⎼ from mountain crests to dry lake beds ⎼ and include both surface and subsurface deposits. Cultural resources are categorized as buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts (including cultural landscapes and Traditional Cultural Properties) under the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Historic properties are cultural resources included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), maintained by the Secretary of the Interior (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 60.4). See Section III.8.1.1 for more information on federal regulations and historic properties. This chapter discusses three types of cultural resources classified by their origins: prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic. Prehistoric cultural resources are associated with the human occupation of California prior to prolonged European contact. These resources may include sites and deposits, structures, artifacts, rock art, trails, and other traces of Native American human behavior. In California, the prehistoric period began over 12,000 years ago and extended through the eighteenth century until 1769, when the first Europeans settled in California. Ethnographic resources represent the heritage of a particular ethnic or cultural group, such as Native Americans or African, European, Latino, or Asian immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Transportation Environmental Justice Collaborative Project “End of Project Final Report”
    California Central Valley Tribal Transportation Environmental Justice Collaborative Project “End of Project Final Report” Prepared by: Dr. Donna Miranda-Begay, Grant Project Manager Tribal Chairwoman of Tubatulabals of Kern Valley Prepared for Caltrans Districts 6 and 10, and the eight San Joaquin Valley Regional Transportation Planning Agencies: San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG), Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG), Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG), Madera County Transportation Commission (MCTC), Council of Fresno County Governments (Fresno COG), Kings County Association of Governments (KCAG), and Kern Council of Governments (KCOG) and Grant Participants www.caltribalej.com November 9, 2010 Preface This grant report is dedicated to the California Tribal Ancestors and current day Tribal Leaders who understood the need to balance the protection of cultural resources and plan for sustainable communities. We also pay tribute to Darrel Hildebrand, Kern Council of Government (KCOG) – Assistant Director. Darrel passed away on November 5, 2009. Darrel promoted the importance for Tribal input to County and California Statewide Regional Blueprint planning process. Darrel encouraged KCOG to apply for this Caltrans Environmental Justice Planning Grant and collaborated with Kern County area Tribes regarding San Joaquin Blueprint and local and regional planning. This grant invited 47 California Central Valley Tribes to participate in this grant project. We thank the Tribal participants for all their input, report writing, and support. In the past, many of the participating Tribal leaders had developed trust and good rapport with Anthropologists, Archeologists, Linguists, and other environmental and historical researchers. However, today - there is still a need to continue to develop Tribal rapport and trust with local and regional government representative and planners.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of Kitanemuk Prehistory
    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Some Aspects of Kitanemuk Prehistory Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3mm1r5kt Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 2(2) ISSN 0191-3557 Author Sutton, Mark Q Publication Date 1980-12-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 214-225(1980). Some Aspects of Kitanemuk Prehistory MARK Q. SUTTON HE Kitanemuk are one of the lesser tern, economy, and social organization of the Tknown native groups in California. The valley inhabitants took place at that time. The Kitanemuk spoke a Serran language of the post 300 B.P. population ofthe valley repre­ Takic family (Bright 1975) and inhabited sent the ethnographically documented Kitane­ and/or claimed portions of the Tehachapi muk. It would appear, however, that the pre- Mountains and the southwesternmost portion 300 B.P. populations, were quite different of the Mojave Desert (Antelope Valley) during culturally. The extant archaeological data the proto-historic period. seem to be substantial enough to distinguish Relatively little ethnographic and archaeo­ this cultural change and to suggest economic, logical data on the Kitanemuk are available for socio-political, and territorial changes during study. The ethnographic data (cf. Harrington's the late prehistoric period. Comparisons Kitanemuk notes) were gathered fairly late, between the ethnographic Kitanemuk and the represent a shallow time depth, and pertain archaeological record from the Antelope mainly to the Tehachapi Mountains. The Valley support this hypothesis and are dis­ archaeological data are limited, primarily from cussed below.
    [Show full text]