DOCSLIB.ORG

Wednesday 3 July 2019 Thursday 4 July 2019 Friday 5 July

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wednesday 3 July 2019 Thursday 4 July 2019 Friday 5 July Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 3 July 2019 4 July 2019 5 July 2019 6 July 2019 Registration Registration Registration 08:30–09:00 08:30–09:00 08:30–09:00 Main Foyer, CYT Bldg Main Foyer, CYT Bldg Main Foyer, CYT Bldg Opening Ceremony 09:00–09:30 LT1, CYT Bldg Keynote Speech Panel Sction (S3) Panel Section (S7) 09:30–10:15 09:00–10:30 09:00–10:30 LT1, CYT Bldg CYT Bldg CYT Bldg Tea Break 10:15–10:30 Main Foyer, CYT Bldg Tea Break Tea Break Round Table: 10:30–11:00 10:30–11:00 Governance & 2/F Foyer, CYT Bldg 2/F Foyer, CYT Bldg Think-tanks in HK Panel Section (S4) Panel Section (S8) 10:30–12:30 11:00–12:30 11:00–12:30 LT1, CYT Bldg CYT Bldg CYT Bldg Lunch Time Lunch Time Lunch Time 12:30–14:00 12:30–14:00 12:30–14:00 3/F, CYT Bldg 3/F, CYT Bldg 3/F, CYT Bldg Panel Section (S1) Panel Section (S5) Editors’ Forum 14:00–15:30 14:00–15:30 14:00–15:30 CYT Bldg CYT Bldg LT1A, CYT Bldg Tea Break Tea Break Closing Ceremony 15:30–16:00 15:30–16:00 15:30–16:00 Main Foyer, CYT Bldg 2/F Foyer, CYT Bldg LT1A, CYT Bldg Panel Section (S2) Panel Section (S6) 16:00–18:00 16:00–18:00 CYT Bldg CYT Bldg Welcome Gathering Reception Gala Dinner Farewell Reception 18:00–19:30 18:00–19:00 *18:15–21:30 #17:40–21:30 Main Foyer, CYT Bldg Main Foyer, CYT Bldg ClubONE Riviera Victoria Habour Cruise * Coaches will be arranged for pick up from CYT Building to ClubONE Riviera at 18:15 # Coaches will be arranged for pick up from CYT Building to Hung Hom Pier at 17:40 1 1 OVERVIEW 23 FRIDAY( 5 JULY ) 23 ● Panel Section 3 (S3) 3 ABOUT US 30 ● Panel Section 4 (S4) 3 ● Organisers 37 ● Panel Section 5 (S5) 6 ● ICGRG 2019 Committees 43 ● Panel Section 6 (S6) 8 WEDNESDAY( 3 JULY) 50 ● Gala Dinner 8 ● Welcome Gathering 52 SATURDAY( 6 JULY ) 8 THURSDAY( 4 JULY ) 52 ● Panel Section 7 (S7) 8 ● Opening Ceremony 58 ● Panel Section 8 (S8) 8 ● Keynote Speech 64 ● Editors’ Forum 9 ● Roundtable: Governance & Think-tank in Hong Kong 64 ● Closing Ceremony 10 ● Panel Section 1 (S1) 65 ● Farewell Reception (Habour Cruise) 17 ● Panel Section 2 (S2) 22 ● Reception 2 Department of Government and Public Administration The Chinese University of Hong Kong Founded in 1970, the Department of Government and Public Administration has been committed to excellence in teaching, research and community service. Our faculty members are experts in their fields. In addition to their teaching duties, they participate in a wide range of scholarly, professional and community activities. The department is able to provide not only a rich curriculum but also an exciting place to learn and grow intellectually. It is one of the best of its kind in Hong Kong. The Department offers degree programmes at both undergraduate and graduate levels. The undergraduate programme provides a well-rounded training in political science and public administration. It comprises a group of core courses which introduce the disciplines as well as a series of elective courses dealing with a wide range of contemporary topics in politics and public administration. The Department is strongly committed to fostering critical thinking in students, so that our graduates are able to put their skills to work effectively in their future careers and lives. And at the graduate level, the Department offers programmes focused on research that can lead to MPhil and PhD degrees. 3 Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies The Chinese University of Hong Kong Established in 1990, the Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies (HKIAPS) aims to promote multi-disciplinary research on social, economic and political development. HKIAPS is devoted to fostering academic exchange by organising regular public lectures, seminars and international conferences. The Institute also disseminates research findings to the public through the publication of research monographs and occasional papers. The objectives of the HKIAPS are: 1. To develop the CUHK into a research and academic centre of excellence in the interrelated study of Hong Kong, mainland China, and the Asia-Pacific region; 2. To enable Hong Kong to better adjust to and make best use of the changes taking place in China and the Asia-Pacific region; 3. To serve as a “think-tank” for the Hong Kong government, the Chinese government, and policymakers in public and private sectors; 4. To broaden the intellectual horizon of the policymakers and to develop policy alternatives for the community. 4 European Consortium of Political Research (ECPR) Standing Group on the Regulatory Governance The study of regulation and regulatory governance is attracting an increasing attention in the field of political science. The Standing Group was founded in March 2005 by David Levi-Faur, Hebrew University, and Jacint Jordana, Pompeu Fabra University. The Standing Group’s founding members and those who joined it subsequently believe that the study of regulation and governance is increasingly important topic in the social sciences. The aim of the Standing Group is to provide a platform and infrastructure for encouraging studies in this area and the creation of an institutional arena for mutual interaction and debate. We aim to bring together a broad range of scholars working on (various aspects) of “Regulatory Governance” in all parts of the world, including scholars from fields such as law, economics, sociology, criminology, (social) psychology and history for a fruitful exchange of ideas and knowledge on regulatory governance. However, as a Standing Group of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR), the main focus of the group will be on the political aspects of regulation. We believe in openness and pluralism and intend to open the group not only for different disciplines but to different theoretical perspective and to a variety of methodological approaches. 5 ICGRG 2019 Committees Co-Chairs Prof. Fanny M. Cheung (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Prof. Carlos W. H. Lo (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Advisory Committee Prof. Yury Blagov (St. Petersburg University, Russia) Prof. John Braithwaite (The Australian National University) Prof. Gerald Chan (The University of Auckland, New Zealand) Prof. Neil Gunningham (The Australian National University) Prof. Fiona Haines (The University of Melbourne, Australia) Prof. Grame Hodge (Monash University, Australia) Prof. Bridget Hutter (The London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom) Prof. Wai-Fung Lam (The University of Hong Kong) Prof. Eungkyoon Lee (Korea University) Prof. David Levi-Faur (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel) Prof. Jolene Lin (National University of Singapore) Prof. Peng Liu (Renmin University of China) Prof. Tak-Wing Ngo (The University of Macau) Prof. Christine Parker (The University of Melbourne, Australia) Prof. M Ramesh (National University of Singapore) Dr. Subhasis Ray (Xavier University, India) Prof. Colin Scott (University College Dublin, Ireland) Prof. Jodi Short (The University of California, Hastings College of the Law, United States) Prof. Ching-Ping Tang (Chengchi University, Taiwan) Prof. Shui-Yan Tang (The University of Southern California, United States) Prof. Veronica Taylor (The Australian National University) Prof. Benjamin van Rooij (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Prof. Richard Walker (City University of Hong Kong) Prof. Eric Windholz (Monash University, Australia) Prof. Jiannan Wu (Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China) Prof. Xun Wu (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) Prof. Lan Xue (Tsinghua University, China) Prof. Dali Yang (The University of Chicago, United States) Prof. Kaifeng Yang (Renmin University of China) Prof. Feihu Ying (Shenzhen University, China) 6 Organising Committee Prof. David Donald (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Prof. Julien Chaisse (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Prof. Peter Fong (Hong Kong Public Administration Association) Prof. Wei Li (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Dr Ning Liu (City University of Hong Kong) Prof. Michelle Miao (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Prof. William Smith (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Prof. Wilson Wong (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Dr Richard Wu (The University of Hong Kong) Dr Henry Yee (The University of Hong Kong) Dr Victor Zheng (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Dr Xueyong Zhan (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) Prof. Chao Xi (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Scientific Committee Prof. Nancy Reichman (Chair) (University of Denver, United States) Prof. David Levi-Faur (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel) Prof. Bridget Hutter (The London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom) Prof. Carlos Lo (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Prof. Salvador Parrado (Distance Learning University (UNED), Spain) Prof. Benjamin van Rooij (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Prof. Shui-yan Tang (The University of Southern California, United States) 7 3 July Welcome Gathering 18:00–19:00 Venue: Main Foyer, Henry Cheng International Conference Centre 1/F, Cheng Yu Tung Building The Chinese University of Hong Kong 4 July Opening Ceremony 09:00–09:30 Venue: LT1, Henry Cheng International Conference Centre 1/F, Cheng Yu Tung Building The Chinese University of Hong Kong Welcome Speech: Prof. Rocky S. Tuan Vice-Chancellor, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Opening Speech: Mr Matthew K. C. Cheung Chief Secretary for Administration, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 4 July Keynote Speech 09:30–10:15 Venue: LT1, Henry Cheng International Conference Centre 1/F, Cheng Yu Tung Building The Chinese University of Hong
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reviewing and Evaluating the Direct Elections to the Legislative Council and the Transformation of Political Parties in Hong Kong, 1991-2016
    Journal of US-China Public Administration, August 2016, Vol. 13, No. 8, 499-517 doi: 10.17265/1548-6591/2016.08.001 D DAVID PUBLISHING Reviewing and Evaluating the Direct Elections to the Legislative Council and the Transformation of Political Parties in Hong Kong, 1991-2016 Chung Fun Steven Hung The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong After direct elections were instituted in Hong Kong, politicization inevitably followed democratization. This paper intends to evaluate how political parties’ politics happened in Hong Kong’s recent history. The research was conducted through historical comparative analysis, with the context of Hong Kong during the sovereignty transition and the interim period of democratization being crucial. For the implementation of “one country, two systems”, political democratization was hindered and distinct political scenarios of Hong Kong’s transformation were made. The democratic forces had no alternative but to seek more radicalized politics, which caused a decisive fragmentation of the local political parties where the establishment camp was inevitable and the democratic blocs were split into many more small groups individually. It is harmful. It is not conducive to unity and for the common interests of the publics. This paper explores and evaluates the political history of Hong Kong and the ways in which the limited democratization hinders the progress of Hong Kong’s transformation. Keywords: election politics, historical comparative, ruling, democratization The democratizing element of the Hong Kong political system was bounded within the Legislative Council under the principle of the separation of powers of the three governing branches, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Popular elections for the Hong Kong legislature were introduced and implemented for 25 years (1991-2016) and there were eight terms of general elections for the Legislative Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Conference of the Hong Kong Political Science Association
    Annual conference of the Hong Kong Political Science Association (HKPSA) Hong Kong and Globalization, 21 October 2017 Hang Seng Management College Siu Lik Yuen, Shatin Morning Plenary Sessions: Fung Yiu King Hall Block A401 9:30 Welcome Remarks by Professor Simon HO, President, Hang Seng Management College 9:35 Souvenir presentation to Mr. Alan CHAN, CEO, Kentucky Fried Chicken-Hong Kong/Macao, conference lunch sponsor and to Consul Generals, and group photo 9:40-11:00 Consular Roundtable on Hong Kong Globalization (Fung Yiu King Hall, A401) Topic: Hong Kong and Globalization Chair: Sonny LO (HKPSA President) Ken GORDON, Australian Deputy Consul-General Eric BERTI, French Consul General Mehdi FAKHERI, Iranian Consul-General Esther BLYTHE, UK Deputy Consul-General Dante PARADISO, Chief of the Political & Economic Section for the US Consulate General (Hong Kong and Macau) 11:10-12:30 Premier Forum: China’s Hong Kong SAR at 20 (Fung Yiu King Hall, A401) Chair: Ming CHAN (Distinguished Practitioner, Center for East Asian Studies, Stanford University) WANG Zhenmin – Director-General, Law Department, PRC Central Government Liaison Office-HK, PRC NPC Hong 1 Kong Basic Law Committee member, ex-Dean of Law School at Tsinghua University George CAUTHERLEY – Hong Kong Democratic Foundation Chair/Vice Chair Martin LEE – Senior Counsel, Hong Kong Democratic Party Founding Chair; Legislative Councillor (1985-2008), Hong Kong Basic Law Drafting Committee member (1985-1989), Hong Kong Bar Association Chair (1980-1983) Willy LAM – Adjunct Professor, History Department & Centre for China Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong 12:30-1:30 Lunch and Luncheon lectures 1. Charles T.
    [Show full text]
  • Lantau Tomorrow Vision: to Reclaim Or Not to Reclaim?
    LANTAU TOMORROW VISION: TO RECLAIM OR NOT TO RECLAIM? Case ID: 2020008B Introduction Housing is one of the most challenging livelihood issues in Hong Kong. In fact, current Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor considers housing a formidable and complex problem. A direct cause of the housing shortage is the limited supply of land for housing. As the demand for housing as well as commercial and office space continues to increase, the need to find or create land for development is becoming all the more pressing. Adopting a multi-pronged approach, the government set up the Land Supply Task Force that conducted a study that included a public consultation on the various potential sources for land. Among these options is the creation of artificial islands off the coast of Southeast Lantau. Lam has made this a priority policy area of her government, launching the Lantau Tomorrow Vision proposal in her 2018 Policy Address. The plan is envisioned to provide as many as 400,000 residential units by the year 2032, of which 70 per cent will be public housing, with some units planned to be released earlier for occupancy. Various concern and environmental groups such as the Save Lantau Alliance oppose the development plan. According to these groups, the plan is wasteful and unnecessary, since there is still sufficient existing land that can be utilised, provided there is sufficient political will on the part of the government. Other groups such as Our Hong Kong Foundation support this plan, with some even proposing an enhanced version of the development plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey: English
    Survey on 2016 Legislative Council Elections Public Governance Programme, Lingnan University Hello! We are from Lingnan University. We are conducting a survey on 2016 Legislative Council Elections. Is your number XXXX XXXX ? Among your household members, how many of them are registered voters? Yes, enter the number and find the computer-chosen one for interview. No, interview stops and say “thank you”. The survey is a part of an important research project. It is a bit long and will last for more than 15 minutes. Are you ok with that? 1. How interested would you say you are in politics? Are you very interested, somewhat interested, not very interested, or not at all interested? (1) Very interested (2) Somewhat interested (3) Not very interested (4) Not at all interested (7) Refused to answer (8) Don’t know 2. How closely do you follow politics on TV, radio, newspapers, or the Internet? Very closely, fairly closely, not very closely, or not at all? (1) Very closely (2) Fairly closely (3) Not very closely (4) Not at all (7) Refused to answer (8) Don’t know Please tell me whether you strongly agree, somewhat agree, neither agree nor disagree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with each of the following statements. 3. [Do you strongly agree, somewhat agree, neither agree nor disagree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with the following statement:] You feel you understand the most important political issues of this country. (1) Strongly agree (2) Somewhat agree (3) Neither agree nor disagree (4) Somewhat disagree (5) Strongly disagree (7) Refused to answer (8) Don’t know 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong Power For
    Public Opinion Programme, The University of Hong Kong Power for Democracy 2016 Legislative Council Election Pre-nomination Survey Questionnaire Survey Method： Random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers Target Population： Cantonese-speaking registered voters living in Hong Kong aged 18 or above Sample Size： No fewer than 5,000 cases Survey Date： 20 June to 8 July 2016 Part I - Introduction Good evening, sir/miss/madam, this is Mr/Ms X, I am an interviewer from the Public Opinion Programme (POP) at The University of Hong Kong. We would like to ask for your opinion regarding the 2016 Legislative Council Election, which would take you a couple of minutes, and you can choose to terminate the interview any time. Please rest assured that your number was randomly selected by our computer and your responses will be kept strictly confidential and used for aggregate analysis only. If you have any questions about the research, you can call xxxx-xxxx to talk to our supervisors. If you want to know more about the rights as a participant, please contact The University of Hong Kong (full name: Human Research Ethics Committee of The University of Hong Kong) at xxxx-xxxx during office hours. For quality control purpose, our conversation may be recorded and kept for 6 months at most which will be destroyed after our quality control process is complete. Is it okay for us to start this survey? Yes No (Interview ends) [S1] Is your telephone number xxxx-xxxx? Yes No Interview ends, thank you for your cooperation, bye-bye 1 Part II - Selection of
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL RECORD of PROCEEDINGS Wednesday, 17
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 17 June 2015 13095 OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Wednesday, 17 June 2015 The Council met at Eleven o'clock MEMBERS PRESENT: THE PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JASPER TSANG YOK-SING, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALBERT HO CHUN-YAN THE HONOURABLE LEE CHEUK-YAN THE HONOURABLE JAMES TO KUN-SUN THE HONOURABLE CHAN KAM-LAM, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG YIU-CHUNG THE HONOURABLE EMILY LAU WAI-HING, J.P. THE HONOURABLE TAM YIU-CHUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ABRAHAM SHEK LAI-HIM, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TOMMY CHEUNG YU-YAN, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE FREDERICK FUNG KIN-KEE, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE VINCENT FANG KANG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-HING, B.B.S., M.H. PROF THE HONOURABLE JOSEPH LEE KOK-LONG, S.B.S., J.P., Ph.D., R.N. 13096 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 17 June 2015 THE HONOURABLE JEFFREY LAM KIN-FUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ANDREW LEUNG KWAN-YUEN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG TING-KWONG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE RONNY TONG KA-WAH, S.C. THE HONOURABLE CYD HO SAU-LAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE STARRY LEE WAI-KING, J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE LAM TAI-FAI, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN HAK-KAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN KIN-POR, B.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE PRISCILLA LEUNG MEI-FUN, S.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE LEUNG KA-LAU THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG KWOK-CHE THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-KIN, S.B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Legislative Council Election Rolling Survey
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG 香港大學 PUBLIC OPINION PROGRAMME 民意研究計劃 Tel 電話: (852) 3917 7700 Fax 傳真: (852) 2546 0561 Website 網址: http://hkupop.hku.hk Address: Room 706, 7/F, The Jockey Club Tower, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong 地址: 香港薄扶林香港大學賽馬會教學樓 7 樓 706 室 Public Opinion Programme The University of Hong Kong 2016 Legislative Council Election Rolling Survey Questionnaire August 2016 The Public Opinion Programme (POP) was established in June 1991 at the Social Sciences Research Centre under the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Hong Kong. It was transferred to the Journalism and Media Studies Centre of the University of Hong Kong in May 2000, and then back to the Faculty of Social Sciences in January 2002. 香港大學民意研究計劃在一九九一年六月成立，初時隸屬香港大學社會科學學院的社會科學研究中心， 二零零零年五月轉往香港大學新聞及傳媒研究中心，二零零二年一月再轉回香港大學社會科學學院管轄。 2016 Legislative Council Election Rolling Survey Questionnaire Part I Introduction Good evening, sir/miss/madam, this is Mr/Ms X, I am an interviewer from the Public Opinion Programme (POP) at The University of Hong Kong. We would like to ask for your opinion regarding the 2016 Legislative Council Election, which would take you a couple of minutes. Please rest assured that your number was randomly selected by our computer and your responses will be kept strictly confidential and used for aggregate analysis only. If you have any questions about the research, you can call xxxx-xxxx to talk to our supervisors. If you want to know more about the rights as a participant, please contact The University of Hong Kong (full name: Human Research Ethics Committee of The University of Hong Kong) at xxxx-xxxx during office hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannah Arendt and the Problem of Democratic Revolution
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Hannah Arendt and the Problem of Democratic Revolution A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science John Louis LeJeune Committee in charge: Professor Tracy B. Strong, Chair Professor Harvey Goldman Professor Gerry Mackie Professor Richard Madsen Professor Philip Roeder 2014 Copyright John Louis LeJeune, 2014 All rights reserved. The dissertation of John Louis LeJeune is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2014 iii Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of my aunt, Melanie Maria LeJeune (1965-2013), who was a mother to all, and to Wang Ke, of two! iv Epigraph The ceaseless, senseless demand for original scholarship in a number of fields, where only erudition is now possible, has led either to sheer irrelevancy, the famous knowing of more and more about less and less, or to the development of pseudo-scholarship which actually destroys its object. Hannah Arendt 1972 v Table of Contents Signature Page……………………………………………………………………………………….. iii Dedication……………………………………………………………………………………………... iv Epigraph………………………………………………………………………………………………... v Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………… vi Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………... vii Vita………………………………………………………………………………………………………... viii Abstract of the Dissertation….……………...…………………………………………………. ix Chapter I: Revolutionary Narrative and the Twentieth
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the Internet and Manually Processed Into .Txt Files
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Boyle, Martin (2019) Republic of China Independence (Huadu): A Realist-Constructivist Account of Taiwan's Maintenance of Its de facto Independence. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent,. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/75555/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Republic of China Independence (Huadu): A Realist-Constructivist Account of Taiwan’s Maintenance of Its De Facto Independence Martin Boyle Thesis submitted for the award of PhD in International Relations School of Politics and International Relations University of Kent February 2019 Approved as to style and content by Head of School: First supervisor: Second supervisor: Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................. vii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ ix Note on Translation and Romanisation .............................................................xiii Glossary of Chinese Terms .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Participation and EIA Effectiveness: Empirical Case Studies in Hong Kong
    Public Participation and EIA Effectiveness: Empirical Case Studies in Hong Kong By: Hung Shiu Fung A thesis submitted in accordance to the requirement of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Prof. Thomas Fischer, my supervisor, for accepting my PhD application and provide his guidance throughout my five years of research. I would like to thank Dr Urmila Jha Thakur, Dr Oliver Sykes, and Dr Samuel Heyes for their help in progressing my works. I would also like to acknowledge the support from the University of Liverpool staff, who provided me training and assistance. I am grateful to all the interviewees for providing me with the information on the subject and their experiences. They helped me better understand the issues and conduct a more comprehensive analysis in the research. Finally, I would like to thank my parents for supporting my decision to do a PhD. DECLARATION This is a self-funded research project. While the author worked as an environmental consultant in Hong Kong and involved in several EIA projects, the author does not have any direct involvement in any of the case studies used in this study. ABSTRACT While public participation is now considered a crucial component in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) practice, many contexts on the role and function of public participation in EIA practices have yet to be explored. There is a need for advancing the theories on the EIA in the light of nowadays challenges. This PhD thesis adopted an inductive approach to seek answers to the research questions of "Does public participation make EIA more effective?" and “How does public participation make EIA more effective?”.
    [Show full text]
  • Aaron Swartz
    Vital Democracy This page intentionally left blank Vital Democracy A Theory of Democracy in Action Frank Hendriks Translated by R. Stuve 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX26DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York # Frank Hendriks 2010 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Library of Congress Control Number : 2009942566 Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by MPG Books Group, Bodmin and King’s Lynn ISBN 978 0 19 957278 6 13579108642 Contents List of Figures vii List of Boxes ix Preface xi Acknowledgements xv Opening Debate 1 Part I.
    [Show full text]
  • Dividing Classes: Segregation of Ethnic Minorities in Hong Kong Schools
    DIVIDING CLASSES: SEGREGATION OF ETHNIC MINORITIES IN HONG KONG SCHOOLS By Ma-Theresa M. CUNANAN A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Education and Life-Long Learning, University of East Anglia June 2011 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognize that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived may be published without the author’s prior written consent Declaration I certify that the work contained in this thesis submitted by me for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy is my original work, except where due reference is made to other authors, and has not previously been submitted by me for a degree at this or any other University. Signature: ________________________________________ Date: June 2011 PhD Thesis Title Dividing Classes: Segregation of Ethnic Minorities in Hong Kong Schools by MA-THERESA M. CUNANAN 2011 Abstract This thesis examines some of the issues surrounding the schooling experiences of ethnic minority students who attend mainstream, but segregated, secondary schools in Hong Kong. These ethnic minority students have been labelled by the Education Bureau as “non-Chinese speaking” (NCS) students and the schools they attend have been labelled as “designated schools”. This is a case study which looks into the complex ways in which meritocracy, segregation and social justice work within the Hong Kong education system, affecting higher education opportunities for ethnic minorities. It is commonly accepted that higher education opens doors to more opportunities and higher socio-economic status.
    [Show full text]