DOCSLIB.ORG

Aaron Swartz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aaron Swartz Vital Democracy This page intentionally left blank Vital Democracy A Theory of Democracy in Action Frank Hendriks Translated by R. Stuve 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX26DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York # Frank Hendriks 2010 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Library of Congress Control Number : 2009942566 Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by MPG Books Group, Bodmin and King’s Lynn ISBN 978 0 19 957278 6 13579108642 Contents List of Figures vii List of Boxes ix Preface xi Acknowledgements xv Opening Debate 1 Part I. Concepts 15 1. Plural Democracy 17 2. Layered Democracy 31 Part II. Practices 47 3. Pendulum Democracy 49 4. Consensus Democracy 66 5. Voter Democracy 86 6. Participatory Democracy 107 Part III. Lessons 133 7. Mixing Democracy 135 8. Reforming Democracy 157 Closing Debate 178 Notes 189 Bibliography 219 Index 235 This page intentionally left blank List of Figures 1.1. Models of democracy 27 2.1. Pure versus impure democracy 32 2.2. Models of democracy, expressions, and foundations 33 2.3. Political culture and democratic ethos 37 2.4. Societal cultures 38 2.5. Citizenship styles 42 2.6. Leadership styles 44 2.7. Expressions of democratic models dealt with in Part II 45 3.1. Pendulum democracy: qualities and drawbacks 64 3.2. Pendulum democracy: strengths and weaknesses 65 4.1. Consensus democracy: qualities and drawbacks 84 4.2. Consensus democracy: strengths and weaknesses 85 5.1. Voter democracy: qualities and drawbacks 105 5.2. Voter democracy: strengths and weaknesses 106 6.1. Participatory democracy opposed to voter democracy 108 6.2. Participatory democracy: qualities and drawbacks 129 6.3. Participatory democracy: strengths and weaknesses 131 7.1. Variations on a theme 138 7.2. Positive and negative feedback mechanisms 139 7.3. Pure versus impure democracy 140 7.4. Six hybrids 142 7.5. Democracy and good governance 148 7.6. Strengths and weaknesses of models of democracy revisited 152 7.7. Models of democracy and cultural perspectives 154 7.8. System, setting, and culture 156 8.1. Policy issues arranged 168 8.2. Recapitulation: consensus democracy in the Netherlands 173 vii This page intentionally left blank List of Boxes 1.1. A general definition of democracy 22 1.2. Some other definitions of democracy 22 1.3. Categories of democracy 25 ix This page intentionally left blank Preface – Why is it that when people talk about democracy they usually talk past one another? One important reason for this is that they often proceed from the idea that there is only a single, superior ‘true democracy’, while in reality democracy is a plural phenomenon. A simple principle – the con- traction of demos and kratia, the people who rule – gives rise to various forms of thinking and operating. – How are these various forms built and to what effect? Democracy takes myriad forms, but four elementary forms repeatedly appear in several variants and mixtures whenever and wherever democracy is tried and tested. These four have different strengths and weaknesses which reveal themselves when the models are compared. – What lessons can be learned from doing this? One important lesson is that productive blending of democratic models, and that sensitivity to the situational and cultural context of democracy are crucial for its develop- ment and vitality. Given that democratic idealists are usually keen on pure models and as a rule do not evidence the required contextual sensitivity, this is an important task for democratic realists. In a nutshell, these are the issues that I elaborate in the book, which I have divided into three parts: concepts (I), practices (II), and lessons (III). This preface outlines the structure of the book and the debate from which I proceed. The underlying debate Democracy is a core concept in the public domain. It is a concept that is often played as a trump card in public debates. Any proposed solution can be declared bad and set aside if labelled ‘undemocratic’. Any problem becomes more serious if it can be represented as a ‘problem of democracy’. An important problem today appears to be the ‘chasm’ that has grown xi Vital Democracy between citizens and their government; some maintain that the two have drifted too far apart. This threatens not only the legitimacy of and support for democracy but also its effectiveness and capacity to solve problems. The proposed solution in many cases is ‘more democracy’ or ‘democratic renewal’. That the solution lies in democracy is usually beyond dispute. Almost nobody makes the case for ‘less democracy’ or the ‘dismantling of democracy’. That is a sign of the times. It was once possible to be against democracy – Plato is the classic example – and yet still be respectable. These days such a position would hardly be tenable. Hans-Hermann Hoppe, author of Democracy: The God That Failed (2001), is one of the few exceptions. Yet, in principle, even he places democracy on high (‘The God That Failed’).1 Another exception is Fareed Zakaria who questions excessive democratization in The Future of Freedom. He does not, however, reject democracy itself.2 Just like Zakaria, today’s critic of democracy is generally an advocate of democracy-in-a-particular-form. The desired form is not sufficiently insti- tutionalized; there is either too much or too little of it. This kind of critique is often heard. There has yet to be a society which has unanimously declared its satisfaction with democracy. In opposition to those who advo- cate democracy-in-a-particular-form are adherents of democracy-in-another- form. There is nothing wrong with this on the face of it. Quite the contrary: a vital democracy demands serious discussion between adversaries in order to keep themselves and the system sharp.3 The problem is that this does not happen often enough. There is sufficient debate on democracy, but all too often it ends up being a dialogue of the deaf, a debate in which participants talk past each other; a series of monologues masquerading as dialogue. Everyone knows what democracy is, don’t they? ‘True democracy is ...’ People who find the rest of this sentence self-evident usually fail to recognize divergent if equally legitimate answers – answers others take for granted. The consequence is Babel-like confusion. In addition to suffering from poor hearing, participants in the debate on democracy also often evidence poor sight. In particular, myopia – short- sightedness – is all too common. Democratic reformers are often preoccu- pied with their own favourite model of democracy, and with its advantages. They usually have less interest in the disadvantages and in alternative models of democracy. When examined, the latter tend to be seen in a biased and sombre light. The literature on the subject does not always help. There are quite a few publications on democracy which present a single model as desirable or ideal, and sometimes even do so beatifically. Alternatively, two models are xii Vital Democracy juxtaposed in such a way that one of the two is clearly to be set aside: ‘weak versus strong democracy’, ‘thin versus deep democracy’, ‘old versus new democracy’.4 The present volume In this book I contrast four fundamental forms of democracy without any preconceived notions as to which are good or bad: pendulum democracy, consensus democracy, voter democracy, and participatory democracy. These four models are derived from the contrast between aggregative (majoritarian) and integrative (non-majoritarian) democracy on the one hand and direct (self-governing) and indirect (representative) democracy on the other. These are two well-known dimensions of democracy theory that are usually dealt with separately in the existing literature, but are here approached together. The combination of two dimensions in a single conceptual framework is illuminating, as this book aims to prove. The framework helps to untwine, compare, and understand democratic practices and reform debates. The combined dimensions broaden our view of fundamental democratic forms and their ramifications. The conceptual framework is refined, but not too refined. Particular expressions of democracy are endlessly variable, but its fundamental forms are not. The various ways in which democracy is practised are central to this book. The central part of this work, Part II (Chapters 3 to 6), examines how the four basic models of democracy are given form in the realities of states and places, in which capacities and varieties, and to what effects, positive and negative.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reviewing and Evaluating the Direct Elections to the Legislative Council and the Transformation of Political Parties in Hong Kong, 1991-2016
    Journal of US-China Public Administration, August 2016, Vol. 13, No. 8, 499-517 doi: 10.17265/1548-6591/2016.08.001 D DAVID PUBLISHING Reviewing and Evaluating the Direct Elections to the Legislative Council and the Transformation of Political Parties in Hong Kong, 1991-2016 Chung Fun Steven Hung The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong After direct elections were instituted in Hong Kong, politicization inevitably followed democratization. This paper intends to evaluate how political parties’ politics happened in Hong Kong’s recent history. The research was conducted through historical comparative analysis, with the context of Hong Kong during the sovereignty transition and the interim period of democratization being crucial. For the implementation of “one country, two systems”, political democratization was hindered and distinct political scenarios of Hong Kong’s transformation were made. The democratic forces had no alternative but to seek more radicalized politics, which caused a decisive fragmentation of the local political parties where the establishment camp was inevitable and the democratic blocs were split into many more small groups individually. It is harmful. It is not conducive to unity and for the common interests of the publics. This paper explores and evaluates the political history of Hong Kong and the ways in which the limited democratization hinders the progress of Hong Kong’s transformation. Keywords: election politics, historical comparative, ruling, democratization The democratizing element of the Hong Kong political system was bounded within the Legislative Council under the principle of the separation of powers of the three governing branches, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Popular elections for the Hong Kong legislature were introduced and implemented for 25 years (1991-2016) and there were eight terms of general elections for the Legislative Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek New Right and the Eve of Conservative Populism
    The Visio Journal ● Volume 4 ● 2019 The Greek New Right and the Eve of Conservative Populism By Athanasios Grammenos* The economic crisis in the Eurozone and its dire consequences for Greece terminated the post-1974 political consensus, which was based on a pro-European and democratic concord. The collapse of the social-democratic Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) in 2012 allowed space for the radical Left to become the new pole of the political system. To this advancement, the conservatives, being the other pole, responded with a prompt enlargement attempt to the populist right-wing, engulfing several elements of the New Right. This new political order had had evident effects on the party’s social and economic agenda, escalating the political debate at the expense of established liberal principles. While in opposition (2015-2019), New Democracy (ND), member of the European Peo- ple’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament, voted against a series of liberal bills (gender issues, separation of Church and State, the Macedonian issue, etc.) giving out positions with authoritarian and populist essence. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the rise of the New Right in Greece (2012-2019) in both rhetoric and practice, and its consequences for law institutions, human rights and foreign affairs. It is argued that ND, currently holding office, has been occupied by deeply conservative elements as a response to the rise of the radical Left, adopting occasionally ultra-conservative positions in a wide range of social issues. Although the case of Greece is unlike to those in other European countries, nevertheless, to the extent to which the preservation of traditional hierarchies come into question, the political platform of the Greek New Right, which has embedded authoritarian attitudes cultivating an anti-liberal sub-culture to the party’s voters, is in accordance with several European conservative movements like in Hungary, Austria or Czechia.
    [Show full text]
  • FCG Background-Paper
    FINANCE AND THE COMMON GOOD Background paper for the joint Socires & Sustainable Finance Lab programme (2019-2021) April 2019 Abstract In this three-year programme (2019-2021), Socires and the Sustainable Finance Lab (SFL) explore the feasibility of an alternative arrangement for the financial sector; a financial sector that fruitfully interacts with state and society, together setting goals for finance in service of’ the common good. Why is this necessary? In the past few decades, the ‘logic of finance’ has increasingly nestled itself in all domains of modern societies, crowding out other motives and relational modes for interaction; a phenomenon aptly referred to as ‘financialisation’. Now, with the 2008 financial crisis still fresh in our minds, and other crises - ecological, social and (geo-)political - unfolding before our eyes, research into alternative ways of economic and financial organisation is long overdue. We believe that the countries of the former ‘Rhineland’ - Benelux, Germany and France - still stand in a societal tradition that could be the breeding ground for a fruitful new arrangement between finance, state and society, one in which transactions are embedded in relations. As there is no possibility of dictating this kind of change to any one of the actors involved, we aim to generate such commitment by engaging in high-level dialogue with the relevant stakeholders from the Rhinelandic area. This programme has four pillars – 1) Organising for finance for the common good, 2) Young Professionals programme, 3) International conferences and 4) Working tables - in which different activities are developed, involving both experienced decision makers as well as promising young professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Burghers As Cultural Agents in the Low Countries and the Empire
    Burghers as Cultural Agents in the Low Countries and the Empire VON WIM BLOCKMANS The general theme of this volume, Germany and Western Europe, leaves open the question whether we shall deal with comparisons or with influences. In some cases of particular cul­ tural achievements such as the production of a manuscript or the construction of a major building, it may be possible to identify the intellectual authors and artists, to follow their movements and to compare their products. When we think of more encompassing pro­ cesses such as the dissemination of types of governance or the use of written documents, it becomes much more difficult to point to causes and effects. We will first have to clarify which phenomena we consider to be crucial, to observe the timing of their appearance and impact, before it becomes possible to compare these data and to try and look for influences. Even then, it remains an open question if the phenomena under consideration were really linked, since they might have appeared simultaneously or in succession without any causal relation. If we are looking for cultural transfers through space and time, its general conditions should be kept in mind: we need communication, mobility and the willingness to adopt dif­ ferent practices. None of these preconditions is self­evident; on the other hand, the intens­ ity of communication and mobility, and a tradition of openness enhance the probability of transfers. Adoption mostly requires adaptation in order to incorporate innovations into another cultural universe. This mental attitude presupposes interaction, curiosity and the preparedness to change established traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • West European Politics the Transformation of the Greek Party
    This article was downloaded by: [Harvard University] On: 11 July 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 915668586] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK West European Politics Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713395181 The transformation of the Greek party system since 1951 Takis S. Pappasa a Politics at the Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece To cite this Article Pappas, Takis S.(2003) 'The transformation of the Greek party system since 1951', West European Politics, 26: 2, 90 — 114 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/01402380512331341121 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402380512331341121 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and Its Political Consequences: the Effects On
    Globalization and its Political Consequences: The Effects on Party Politics in the West Helen V. Milner, Princeton University∗ Current Draft: September 20, 2018 Abstract Globalization has grown much since 1980s. What political trends have been associated with this growth? This paper examines two aspects of the political consequences of globalization. Economic globalization, according to some economic theories, has adverse consequences for la- bor, especially less skilled labor, in the rich democracies. If these voters are the median, then we might expect parties to respond to this by turning against globalization and the openness to flows of goods, services, people and capital that it brings. Have parties turned against economic openness? And have parties, especially extreme right-wing ones, that oppose openness advanced in terms of their electoral strength as a result? Furthermore, have these pressures from global- ization been mitigated by social welfare policies, as earlier research claimed? First, updating and extending the research of Burgoon(2009), I ask whether political parties in the advanced indus- trial countries have adopted more anti-internationalist platforms as globalization has advanced. Second, I examine whether parties have been affected deferentially by globalization; in particular, have extreme, right-wing populist parties gained vote share as globalization has proceeded, while mainstream left ones have lost. The evidence suggests that globalization, especially trade, is associated with a political turn to anti-internationalism and to extremist parties. Word Count: 13647 words (Excluding Abstract, Appendix, and References) ∗Prepared for the annual APSA conference, August 2018 Boston MA. Thanks to Dominic De Sapio, Sayumi Miyano, and Bryan Schonfeld for their excellent research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Political Data Set, 1960-2019 Codebook
    1 Codebook: Comparative Political Data Set, 1960-2019 Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET 1960-2019 Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann The Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2019 (CPDS) is a collection of political and institutional data which have been assembled in the context of the research projects “Die Handlungsspielräume des Nationalstaates” and “Critical junctures. An international comparison” directed by Klaus Armingeon and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU- member countries for the period of 1960 to 2019. In all countries, political data were collected only for the democratic periods.1 The data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time-series analyses. The present data set combines and replaces the earlier versions “Comparative Political Data Set I” (data for 23 OECD countries from 1960 onwards) and the “Comparative Political Data Set III” (data for 36 OECD and/or EU member states from 1990 onwards). A variable has been added to identify former CPDS I countries. For additional detailed information on the composition of government in the 36 countries, please consult the “Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2019”, available on the CPDS website. The Comparative Political Data Set contains some additional demographic, socio- and economic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD, Eurostat or AMECO. When using data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source.
    [Show full text]
  • SOEP-IS 2018—ILANGUAGE: Variables from Innovative Language Modules
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics DIW Berlin / SOEP (Ed.) Research Report SOEP-IS 2018 - ILANGUAGE: Variables from innovative language modules SOEP Survey Papers, No. 851 Provided in Cooperation with: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) Suggested Citation: DIW Berlin / SOEP (Ed.) (2020) : SOEP-IS 2018 - ILANGUAGE: Variables from innovative language modules, SOEP Survey Papers, No. 851, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/219075 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • Uniqueness and Possession: Typological Evidence for Type Shifts in Nominal Determination
    Uniqueness and possession: Typological evidence for type shifts in nominal determination Albert Ortmann University of D¨usseldorf Abstract. This paper highlights the analogy of definiteness and pos- session by utilising the distinction between semantic and pragmatic as outlined in L¨obners(2011) Concept Type and Determination approach. Assuming, on the basis of the features [ unique] and [ relational], a classification into the four logical types sortal, relational, individual, and functional concept, nouns will be used either in congruence with or deviating from their underlying type. I present evidence from Germanic and Mayan languages for the following claims: (1) noun uses that deviate from the underlying type tend to be reflected by overt morphology. (2) In article split languages, phonologically 'strong' forms indicate prag- matic uniqueness, thus, denote a function from [− unique] to [+ unique], whereas `weak' forms tend to be semantically redundant. Regarding pos- session, `alienable' morphology denotes a function from non-relational to relational (pragmatic possession), whereas `inalienable' morphology is re- stricted to semantic possession. Overall, split systems imply a strong cor- relation between conceptual markedness and morphosyntactic marked- ness. Keywords: type shift, definiteness, possession, alienability, definite ar- ticles, typology, compositional semantics 1 Introduction1 In this paper I highlight the analogy of two types of nominal determination, namely definiteness and possession, and their cross-linguistic manifestation. I utilise the distinction between semantic and pragmatic as outlined in the Concept Type and Determination (CTD) approach to definiteness in L¨obner(1985, 2011; cf. also Ortmann 2014). This perspective on determination will be pursued in case-studies from, among others, Mayan and Germanic languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN GREECE 17th June 2012 European Elections monitor The Greeks called to ballot again on June 17th in a bid to break the stalemate Corinne Deloy Translated by helen Levy The Shock of May 6th The general elections of May 6th in Greece caused a political earthquake in a country suffering an extremely serious financial and socio-economic crisis. People voted en masse against austerity and Analysis the European Memorandum, the agreement signed in February by Athens with the International 1 month before Monetary Fund (IMF), the Union and the European Central Bank. Both of the main government the pool parties – the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) and New Democracy (ND) collapsed, whilst together they won 77.40% of the vote in the previous elections of October 4th 2009, they only won 32.03% of the vote on May 6th last. ND won 18.85% of the vote (108 seats, +17) in comparison with the last general elections on October 4th 2009 and PASOK were totally wiped out with 13.18% of the vote (41 seats, -119). The real winner of the election was the Radical Left Coalition government together suggesting the establishment of a “na- (SYRIZA) which under the banner “They chose without us. tional salvation” coalition. After failing to do this the leader of Let’s move on without them,” campaigned on the rejection the party that came second, Alexis Tsipras (SYRISA) tried to of the Memorandum and the maintenance of Greece in the form a coalition. This was to no avail since the KKE refused euro zone.
    [Show full text]
  • 9-Camiel Hamans
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The minority language debate: the case of Yiddish in the Dutch language landscape Hamans, C.S.J.M. Publication date 2006 Published in Werkwinkel: a journal of Low Countries and South African studies Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Hamans, C. S. J. M. (2006). The minority language debate: the case of Yiddish in the Dutch language landscape. Werkwinkel: a journal of Low Countries and South African studies, 1(1), 225-252. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:02 Oct 2021 The minority language debate: The case of Yiddish in the Dutch language landscape CAMIEL HAMANS European Parliament, PSE-group Dutch Delegation, Brussels-Strasbourg [email protected] Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Conference of the Hong Kong Political Science Association
    Annual conference of the Hong Kong Political Science Association (HKPSA) Hong Kong and Globalization, 21 October 2017 Hang Seng Management College Siu Lik Yuen, Shatin Morning Plenary Sessions: Fung Yiu King Hall Block A401 9:30 Welcome Remarks by Professor Simon HO, President, Hang Seng Management College 9:35 Souvenir presentation to Mr. Alan CHAN, CEO, Kentucky Fried Chicken-Hong Kong/Macao, conference lunch sponsor and to Consul Generals, and group photo 9:40-11:00 Consular Roundtable on Hong Kong Globalization (Fung Yiu King Hall, A401) Topic: Hong Kong and Globalization Chair: Sonny LO (HKPSA President) Ken GORDON, Australian Deputy Consul-General Eric BERTI, French Consul General Mehdi FAKHERI, Iranian Consul-General Esther BLYTHE, UK Deputy Consul-General Dante PARADISO, Chief of the Political & Economic Section for the US Consulate General (Hong Kong and Macau) 11:10-12:30 Premier Forum: China’s Hong Kong SAR at 20 (Fung Yiu King Hall, A401) Chair: Ming CHAN (Distinguished Practitioner, Center for East Asian Studies, Stanford University) WANG Zhenmin – Director-General, Law Department, PRC Central Government Liaison Office-HK, PRC NPC Hong 1 Kong Basic Law Committee member, ex-Dean of Law School at Tsinghua University George CAUTHERLEY – Hong Kong Democratic Foundation Chair/Vice Chair Martin LEE – Senior Counsel, Hong Kong Democratic Party Founding Chair; Legislative Councillor (1985-2008), Hong Kong Basic Law Drafting Committee member (1985-1989), Hong Kong Bar Association Chair (1980-1983) Willy LAM – Adjunct Professor, History Department & Centre for China Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong 12:30-1:30 Lunch and Luncheon lectures 1. Charles T.
    [Show full text]