Russia/Chechnya the “Dirty War” in Chechnya: Forced Disappearances, Torture, and Summary Executions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Russia/Chechnya the “Dirty War” in Chechnya: Forced Disappearances, Torture, and Summary Executions March 2001 Vol.13, No.1 (D) RUSSIA/CHECHNYA THE “DIRTY WAR” IN CHECHNYA: FORCED DISAPPEARANCES, TORTURE, AND SUMMARY EXECUTIONS SUMMARY. 3 The Obligation to Investigate . 4 Searches by Relatives . 4 BACKGROUND NOTE ON THE RUSSIAN OPERATION IN CHECHNYA . .5 A Note on Detentions . .7 DETENTIONS AND “DISAPPEARANCE”. 7 “Disappearances” After Large-Scale Sweep Operations . 8 Novye and Starye Atagi (January 14 - 16, 2001). 8 The “Disappearance” of Akhmed Zaurbekov and Khamzad Khasarov . .8 The “Disappearance” of Said-Magomed Debizov and Iznaur Serbiev . 9 The Possible “Disappearance” of Bekkhan Bargaev . .9 Gekhi (August 8 to 11, 2000). 9 The “Disappearance” of Ali Musaev (age twenty-eight), Umar Musaev (age twenty-three). 10 The “Disappearance” of Adlan Eldarov . .. .. .11 “Disappearances” During Targeted Sweep and Special Operations . .. .11 The “Disappearance” of Akhdan Tamaev (Roshni-Chu, January 6, 2001). .. 11 The “Disappearance” of Aslan Dundaev, age twenty-four (Urus-Martan, December 18, 2000). 12 The “Disappearance” of Said-Rakhman Musaev, Magomed Magomadov, and Odes Mitaev (Raduzhnoe and Dolinskii villages, December 10, 2000) . 13 The “Disappearance” of Jabrail Alaskhanov (Grozny Central Market, November 26, 2000) . 13 The “Disappearance” of Edilbek Isaev (Sweep Operations at Starye Atagi Hospital, September 7, 2000). 14 The “Disappearance” of Nura Lulueva, Markha Gakaeva, and Raisa Gakaeva (Raid on Northern Market in Grozny, June 3, 2000) . 14 The Raid on Alkhan-Kala Hospital (February 3, 2000). 15 “Disappearances” from Checkpoints or Roads . 16 The “Disappearance” of Said-Khusein Imakaev, age twenty-three (On the Road Between Starye and Novye Atagi, December 17, 2000). .. .. 16 The “Disappearance” of Adam Davletukaev (Alkhan-Kala, December 18, 2000). 16 The “Disappearance” of Adam Abubakarov (Between Urus-Martan and Goity, March 14, 2000) . 16 The “Disappearance” of Islam Dombaev, Murat Lyanov, and Timur Tabzhanov (Sadovaya Street, Grozny, June 28, 2000). 17 The “Disappearance” of Nineteen People at the Checkpoint Between Duba-Yurt and Chiri-Yurt (January 13, February 18 and March 6, 2000). .18 “Disappearances” During Nighttime Raids . .19 The “Disappearance”of Musa Gairbekov (Grozny, October 8, 2000). 19 The “Disappearance” of Lom-Ali Aziev (age twenty-seven) and Umar-Ali Aziev (age twenty-six) (Grozny, September 24, 2000). 19 “Disappearances” from Detention Centers and Police Stations . 20 The “Disappearance”of Abdulkasim Zaurbekov (October district temporary police station, October 17, 2000) . 20 The “Disappearance” of Yusup Satabaev, Yunus Chadaev, Aslanbek Gugiev, and Kazbek Vakhaev (“Internat” Detention Center, Urus-Martan, August 14, 2000) . 21 THE RESPONSE OF STATE AUTHORITIES . .22 Procuracy Investigations into “Disappearances”. 22 Lack of Authority . 23 Lack of Diligence . .25 The Disposition of the Procuracy . 27 The Office of the Special Representative . 29 TORTURE AND SUMMARY EXECUTION . 30 Mass Dumping Site at Dachny Village, near Khankala . 31 The Bodies of Magomed Magomedov, Said-Rakhman Musaev, and Odes Mitaev . 32 The Bodies of Nura Lulueva, Raisa Gakaeva, and Markha Gakaeva . 32 Bodies at the Novye Atagi Quarry (Discovered January 26, 2001) . 32 Dumped Body at Abandoned Farm near Alkhan-Yurt (Discovered January 21, 2001) . 33 Unmarked Grave at Jalka (Discovered September 16 and 20, 2000) . 33 Grave No. 1, Three Dead Bodies, Found September 20, 2000 . 33 Grave No. 2, Two Dead Bodies, Found September 16, 2000 . 34 Unmarked Grave of the Musaev Brothers in Gekhi (Discovered September 12, 2000) . 35 Three Unmarked Graves at Starye Atagi (Discovered April or May, June 15, and September 13, 2000) . 35 Grave No. 1, At Least One Body, Found in April or May, 2000 . 35 Grave No. 2, Four Bodies, Found on June 15, 2000 . 36 Grave No. 3, Four Bodies, Found on September 11, 2000 . 36 Unmarked Grave in Tangi-Chu (Discovered May 10, 2000). 37 A Dumped Body in the Assa River (Discovered April 1, 2000). .37 A Dumped Body at the Urus-Martan Hospital (Discovered March 10, 2000). 37 RECOMMENDATIONS . .39 To the Government of the Russian Federation . 39 To the United Nations Commission on Human Rights . 39 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . 41 For me, every second feels like a whole year —Zulai Azieva, mother of “disappeared” Lom-Ali and Umar-Ali.1 [One official] said that the children were at Khankala, that they had drugs on them. I don’t care if they had taken them with an atomic bomb, but.
Recommended publications
  • Panthera Pardus, Leopard
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T15954A5329380 Panthera pardus, Leopard Assessment by: Henschel, P., Hunter, L., Breitenmoser, U., Purchase, N., Packer, C., Khorozyan, I., Bauer, H., Marker, L., Sogbohossou, E. & Breitenmoser- Wursten, C. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Henschel, P., Hunter, L., Breitenmoser, U., Purchase, N., Packer, C., Khorozyan, I., Bauer, H., Marker, L., Sogbohossou, E. & Breitenmoser-Wursten, C. 2008. Panthera pardus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T15954A5329380. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T15954A5329380.en Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Carnivora Felidae Taxon Name: Panthera pardus (Linnaeus, 1758) Synonym(s): • Felis pardus Linnaeus, 1758 Regional Assessments: • Mediterranean Infra-specific Taxa Assessed: • Panthera pardus ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Law Enforcement and Internal Security Agencies
    September 14, 2020 Russian Law Enforcement and Internal Security Agencies Russia has an extensive internal security system, with Competition frequently leads to arrests and prosecutions, multiple, overlapping, and competitive security agencies often for real or imagined corruption allegations to undercut vying for bureaucratic, political, and economic influence. targeted organizations and senior leadership both Since Vladimir Putin assumed Russia’s leadership, these institutionally and politically. agencies have grown in both size and power, and they have become integral to the security and stability of the Russian Law Enforcement and Internal government. If Putin extends his rule beyond 2024, as is Security Agencies and Heads now legally permissible, these agencies could play a role in (as of September 2020) the leadership succession process and affect the ability of a transitional regime to quell domestic dissent. For Members Ministry of Interior (MVD): Vladimir Kolokoltsev of Congress, understanding the numerous internal security National Guard (Rosgvardiya, FSVNG): Viktor Zolotov agencies in Russia could be helpful in assessing the x Special Purpose Mobile Units (OMON) prospects of regime stability and dynamics of a transition x Special Rapid Response Detachment (SOBR) after Putin leaves office. In addition, Russian security agencies and their personnel have been targeted by U.S. x Interior Troops (VV) sanctions for cyberattacks and human rights abuses. x Kadyrovtsy Overview and Context Federal Security Service (FSB): Alexander Bortnikov
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Kit Northern Caucasus Humanitarian Action
    Briefing Kit Northern Caucasus Humanitarian Action United Nations in the Russian Federation June 2001 Table of Contents 1. Situation overview………………………………………………………………………… 1 1.1 Reference Information: Chechnya and Ingushetia……….………………….………… 1 1.2 Regional overview ……………………..…………………………………….………….... 3 2. Humanitarian action by sector and UN focal points……….………………….….… 3 a. Protection………………………………………………………………….……… 3 b. Food………………………………………………………………………….……. 4 c. Shelter and non-food items……………..………………………………….…… 4 d. Health……………………………………………………………………………... 5 e. Water and sanitation…………………………………………………………….. 5 f. Education…………………………………………………………………………. 5 g. Mine action *……………………………………………………………...……….. 6 3. Coordination and security overview…………………………………………………... 6 3.1 Coordination……………………………………………………………………………….. 6 3.2 Security…………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 4. The International Committee of the Red Cross……………………………………… 8 5. The NGO community……………………………………………………………………... 9 5.1 Overview of the NGOs working in the Northern Caucasus….……………………….. 10 6. Data and statistics………………………………………………………………………... 14 6.1 A note on population figures…………………………………………………...………... 14 6.2 Population movements…………………………………………………………………… 14 6.3 IDP Gender…………………………………………………………………………...…… 14 6.4 Where do the IDPs stay?………………………………………………………………… 14 6.5 UN, ICRC, and NGO geographic coverage……………………………………………. 15 6.6 UN, international organisations, and NGOs working in the Republics of Chechnya and Ingushetia…………..………………………………………………………………… 16 6.7 Food assistance in Ingushetia
    [Show full text]
  • Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam As a Tool of the Kremlin?
    Notes de l’Ifri Russie.Nei.Visions 99 Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam as a Tool of the Kremlin? Marlène LARUELLE March 2017 Russia/NIS Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the few French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European and broader international debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. This text is published with the support of DGRIS (Directorate General for International Relations and Strategy) under “Observatoire Russie, Europe orientale et Caucase”. ISBN: 978-2-36567-681-6 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2017 How to quote this document: Marlène Laruelle, “Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam as a Tool of the Kremlin?”, Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 99, Ifri, March 2017. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15—FRANCE Tel.: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00—Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Ifri-Bruxelles Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 1000—Brussels—BELGIUM Tel.: +32 (0)2 238 51 10—Fax: +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection dedicated to Russia and the other new independent states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan).
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Russia's Closed City: Moscow's Movement Restrictions and the Rule Of
    LIFE IN RUSSIA'S "CLOSED CITY": MOSCOW'S MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS AND THE RULE OF LAW DAmIAN S. SCHAIBLE* The City of Moscow continues to enforce a restrictive residence registrationregime similar to the propiska system that prevailed in the Soviet era-despite constitu- tional guarantees of the freedom of movement, federal statutory provisions imple- menting that right, and Constitutional Court rulings that such restrictions are unconstitutional In this Note, Damian Schaible argues that the continued restric- tions representmore than simply an ongoing violation of the human rights of Mos- cow's illegal residents; they are also an indicatorof Russia's imperfect transition to the rule of law and a practicalobstacle to the success of that transition. IN7MODUCrION In October 1999, while Moscow was gripped by terror in the wake of a series of apartment bombings, 20,000 people in the city were arrested and detained by police,1 while another 15,000 were or- dered to leave the city.2 A family of three was told one morning that they had twenty-four hours to vacate the apartment where they had lived for seven years and to leave Moscow.3 There may be as many as three million other people, still living in Moscow, who are effectively nonpersons in the eyes of local law.4 They are unable to vote, marry * This Note is dedicated to the memory of John Joseph Ostertog (1917-2000), who taught me so much. I would like to thank Professor Alexander Domrin for his helpful comments, and the members of the New York University Law Review, especially Margaret Lemos, David McTaggart, Michael Russano, and David Yocis, for their excellent advice and editorial assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily re ect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scienti c institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the rst time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Engineering Research, volume 177 International Symposium on Engineering and Earth Sciences (ISEES 2018) Environmental Pollution Monitoring of the Chechen Republic (within the period of 2015-2017) Sedieva M.B. Gayrabekov U.T. Department of geology, geophysics and eco-geology Department of geology, geophysics and eco-geology Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of the Russian Academy of Sciences the Russian Academy of Sciences Grozny, Russia the Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic [email protected] Chechen State University Grozny, Russia [email protected] Islamov D.A. Abubakarova E.A. Department of geology, geophysics and eco-geology Department of geology, geophysics and eco-geology Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of the Russian Academy of Sciences the Russian Academy of Sciences Grozny, Russia Oil and Gas Institute [email protected] Grozny State Oil Technical University named after Academician M. D.Millionshchikov Grozny, Russia [email protected] Daukaev A.A. Zaburaeva Kh.Sh. Department of geology, geophysics and eco-geology Department of geology, geophysics and eco-geology Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of the Russian Academy of Sciences the Russian Academy of Sciences the Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic Oil and Gas Institute Chechen State University Grozny State Oil Technical University named Grozny, Russia after Academician M. D.Millionshchikov [email protected] Grozny, Russia [email protected] Badaev S.V. Akhmatkhanov R.Sh.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress the Import Nce
    stress the import nce 2009 Social REPoRT “ We believe that charitable programmes are even more important today than they were during the pre-crisis period. So in the future, as each year throughout the Bank’s history, we will continue to render comprehensive support and financial assistance to essential projects, reaffirming our reputation of a socially responsible company.” Rushan Khvesyuk Chairman of the Executive Board, Member of the Board of Directors Message from Alfa-Bank management As a biggest financial institution in Russia, Alfa-Bank has always attached great importance to social and charitable activities. We are pleased to present our social report telling about some of our most significant events and undertakings in 2009. Alfa-Bank has a profound respect for the cultural heritage of our great country and endeavours to contribute to preserving it. For instance, we financed restoration work on a number of unique books in the Orenburg Universal Scientific Library named after N. Krupskaya, including Decrees of Ekaterina Alexeevna and Peter II published as early as in 1743 and works of Mikhail Lomonosov. In Nizhniy Novgorod, we sponsored restoration of Nikolay Koshelev’s canvas The Burial of Christ which was the ver y fir st ar t work in the collection of the regional museum. Alfa-Bank also covered the costs of restoring two pictures of the globally recognised artist Ivan Shishkin — Evening in a Forest and Evening in a Pine Forest belonging to the Tatarstan State Museum of Fine Arts in Kazan. Having supported initiatives aimed at preserving memory of our past for many years running, we also prioritise care for the young and talented, since they are our future.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation
    MEMORIAL Human Rights Center Migration Rights Network Edited by Svetlana A. Gannushkina On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation August 2006 – October 2007 Moscow 2007 1 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. The project is funded by the European Commission Based on the materials gathered by the Migration Rights Network, Memorial Human Rights Center, Civic Assistance Committee, Internet Publication Caucasian Knot, SOVA Information and Analysis Center, and others S.A. Gannushkina, Head of the Migration Rights Network, Chairwoman of the Civic Assistance Committee L.Sh. Simakova, compiler of the Report Other contributors to the Report included: E. Burtina, S. Magomedov, Sh. Tangiyev, N. Estemirova The Migration Rights Network of Memorial Human Rights Center has 56 offices providing free legal assistance to forced migrants, including five offices located in Chechnya and Ingushetia (www.refugee.memo.ru). In Moscow lawyers from the Migration Rights Network use the charitable Civic Assistance Committee for Refugee Aid as their base (www.refugee.ru). ISBN 978-5-93439-246-9 Distributed free of charge 2 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. CONTENTS I. Introduction............................................................................................................5 II. Svetlana Gannushkina’s speech at the seminar for administrative law judges in Hohenheim, Germany (November 25, 2006): Chechen refugees and the EU qualification rules....................................................................................................6 III. Living conditions and security situation of internally displaced persons and residents of the Chechen Republic......................................................................18 IV. Situation of people from Chechnya in the Republic of Ingushetia......................42 V.
    [Show full text]
  • “As If They Fell from the Sky” RIGHTS Counterinsurgency, Rights Violations, and Rampant Impunity in Ingushetia WATCH
    Russia HUMAN “As If They Fell From the Sky” RIGHTS Counterinsurgency, Rights Violations, and Rampant Impunity in Ingushetia WATCH “As If They Fell From the Sky” Counterinsurgency, Rights Violations, and Rampant Impunity in Ingushetia Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-345-5 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org June 2008 1-56432-345-5 “As If They Fell From the Sky” Counterinsurgency, Rights Violations, and Rampant Impunity in Ingushetia Map of Region.................................................................................................................... 1 I. Summary.........................................................................................................................2 II. Recommendations.......................................................................................................... 7 To the Government of the Russian Federation..................................................................7 To Russia’s International Partners .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The 1999-2004 Georgia Border Monitoring Operation and the 2005-2009 Follow-Up Projects – Lessons Learned and Potential Offerings for Future Engagement
    In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2015, Baden-Baden 2016, pp. 343-357. Rory McCorley The 1999-2004 Georgia Border Monitoring Operation and the 2005-2009 Follow-up Projects – Lessons Learned and Potential Offerings for Future Engagement Introduction As the tenth anniversary of the OSCE’s Border Security and Management Concept (BSMC) approaches, now is an appropriate time to reflect on the Organization’s engagement in border management. Drawing from my experi- ence, with a particular focus on Georgia and reference to projects in Tajiki- stan and Turkmenistan, this article reviews the OSCE’s engagement and identifies lessons related to the management of “green borders”. I will look in detail at the Border Monitoring Operation (BMO) established in Georgia in 1999 as a conflict prevention measure and the follow-on training projects that have come, whether by design or default, to be considered as examples of the Organization’s ability to adapt to and address the needs of participating States. The OSCE’s Border Monitoring Operation Why Was It Necessary? Georgia was faced with many challenges in managing its borders. It had functioned as a somewhat autonomous region since the foundation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). On the collapse of that multi- ethnic state, Georgia declared independence in 1991, and the “former admin- istrative borders between Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Russian Fed- eration became international. But none of these borderlines have been offi- cially delineated or demarcated.”1 The only exceptions this EU report identi- fies are borders with Turkey, which had been established in pre-independence days.
    [Show full text]