DOCSLIB.ORG

Briefing Kit Northern Caucasus Humanitarian Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Briefing Kit Northern Caucasus Humanitarian Action Briefing Kit Northern Caucasus Humanitarian Action United Nations in the Russian Federation June 2001 Table of Contents 1. Situation overview………………………………………………………………………… 1 1.1 Reference Information: Chechnya and Ingushetia……….………………….………… 1 1.2 Regional overview ……………………..…………………………………….………….... 3 2. Humanitarian action by sector and UN focal points……….………………….….… 3 a. Protection………………………………………………………………….……… 3 b. Food………………………………………………………………………….……. 4 c. Shelter and non-food items……………..………………………………….…… 4 d. Health……………………………………………………………………………... 5 e. Water and sanitation…………………………………………………………….. 5 f. Education…………………………………………………………………………. 5 g. Mine action *……………………………………………………………...……….. 6 3. Coordination and security overview…………………………………………………... 6 3.1 Coordination……………………………………………………………………………….. 6 3.2 Security…………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 4. The International Committee of the Red Cross……………………………………… 8 5. The NGO community……………………………………………………………………... 9 5.1 Overview of the NGOs working in the Northern Caucasus….……………………….. 10 6. Data and statistics………………………………………………………………………... 14 6.1 A note on population figures…………………………………………………...………... 14 6.2 Population movements…………………………………………………………………… 14 6.3 IDP Gender…………………………………………………………………………...…… 14 6.4 Where do the IDPs stay?………………………………………………………………… 14 6.5 UN, ICRC, and NGO geographic coverage……………………………………………. 15 6.6 UN, international organisations, and NGOs working in the Republics of Chechnya and Ingushetia…………..………………………………………………………………… 16 6.7 Food assistance in Ingushetia and Chechnya ……………………………………...… 17 6.8 Healthcare activities of NGOs in the Republic of Ingushetia…………….………...… 19 Annexes……………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 A) Memorandum of Understanding B) Donor support to humanitarian action in 2001 Table A. Summary of requirements and contributions by appealing agency Table B. Donor breakdown of contributions through appealing agency Table C. Additional humanitarian assistance to the Russian Federation outside of the framework of the UN consolidated inter-agency appeal C) UN monitoring: from purchase to final delivery D) Information on the course of rehabilitation work in the Republic of Chechnya E) Who’s who F) Organigramme (Federal) G) Organigramme (Regional) H) List of Acronyms and Abbreviations * Mine Action refers to mine awareness, victim assistance, and vocational training. Cover photo: 2 girls displaced by violence seek shelter in a spontaneous settlement. Source: UNHCR 1. SITUATION OVERVIEW Russian Federation Russian Federation Republic of Chechnya Republic of Ingushetia Reference Information Reference Information The Republic of Chechnya has been a constituent Republic of the The Republic of Ingushetia has been a constituent Republic of the Russian Federation since 1936 when it was a part of the Chechen- Ingush Russian Federation since 1936 when it was a part of the Chechen- Ingush Autonomous Soviet Social Republic. In 1991, the Chechen Republic Autonomous Soviet Social Republic. In 1991, the Chechen Republic declared itself independent and Ingushetia and Chechnya separated. The declared itself independent and Ingushetia and Chechnya separated. The Republic is divided into12 districts: Achkhoy-Martanovsky, Groznensky, Republic is divided into 4 districts: Dzhairakhsky, Nazranovsky, Gudermessky, Itum-Kalinsky, Nadterechny, Naursky, Nozhay-Yurtovsky, Malgobeksky, Sunzhensky. Shalinsky, Shatoisky, Shelkovskoy, Urus-Martanovsky, and Vedensky Territory Territory More than 16,000 sq km. 3,600 square kilometres Climate Climate Continental; average temperatures: -5 degrees Centigrade in January; +25 Continental; average temperatures: +5 degrees Centigrade in January; degrees Centigrade in July. +21 degrees Centigrade in July. Major Rivers Major Rivers Terek, Sunzha, Argun Terek, Assa, Sunzha Natural Resources Natural Resources Oil, gas, natural construction materials, mineral water, hot springs Oil, gas, marble, dolomite, chalkstone, mineral water, hot springs. Population Population 500,000 – 800,000 as of January, 1999 (latest available); urban population 316,900 as of January, 1999; urban population – 41.6%, rural population – – 67.8%, rural population – 32.2%. 58.4%. Indigenous nationality – Chechens (Nokhchiy) accounts for 75% of the Indigenous nationality – Ingushi (Galgai); other nationalities include total population; other nationalities include Russians, Ingushi, Armenians, Russians, Chechens, Armenians, Ukrainians, Turks. Ukrainians, Kumyks, Nogays, Ossetians, other North Caucasian peoples. Capital Capital Nazran - temporary administrative centre (76,200 population as of Grozny (approx. 200,000 population as of January, 1999; 2,007 km from January, 1998) Moscow). Magas – new capital, currently under construction Large Cities Large Cities Urus-Martan, Gudermes, Shali, Argun Malgobek, Karabulak Productive Sectors Productive Sectors Agriculture, oil and gas production, oil processing, petrochemistry, Agriculture, oil production, petrochemistry, construction materials, food machine-building, light industry, wood-processing. processing. Source: I.G.Kosikov, L.S.Kosikova ‘Northern Caucasus. Social and Economic Handbook.’ Moscow 1999. 1 2 1.2 REGIONAL OVERVIEW The humanitarian consequences of the events in the northern Caucasus continue to devastate the lives of some 330,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs) and 690,000 residents in the Republic of Chechnya and the Republic of Ingushetia. In late autumn 1999, the United Nations, thanks to the generous financial and in-kind support of the international donor community (see annex B), began to address the protection and assistance needs of civilians in the Northern Caucasus, thereby complementing the relief being provided by the Russian Government (see annex C). During October 2000, the UN agencies involved in humanitarian action, including the UN Development Programme (UNDP), UN Population Fund (UNFPA), UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), World Food Programme (WFP), and World Health Organization (WHO), and for the first time in this context Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), reviewed ongoing programmes in Chechnya and Ingushetia, assessed the current situation, and planned programmes for 2001. The Government's Ministry for Civil Defence, Emergencies, and the Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters (EMERCOM) and the Ministry on the Affairs of Federation, Nationalities and Migration Policy (Ministry of Federation), as well as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), participated in this process. Extensive consultations were held with non-governmental organisations (NGOs). The UN Humanitarian Coordinator, supported by OCHA, organised this process. As projected in the 2001 Consolidated Appeal, throughout the first half of 2001, there has been little or no return from Ingushetia to Chechnya (and of IDPs in Chechnya to their place of origin). This is a result of the continuing instability of the security environment inside Chechnya and the subsequent decision of IDPs to remain in Ingushetia until conditions improve to such an extent that they feel it is safe to return home. The overall goal of the UN's humanitarian programme is to complement governmental action to alleviate suffering and improve the quality of living conditions amongst civilians in need by continuing to provide humanitarian assistance. During 2001 UN agencies have continued to work in the following sectors: protection, food, shelter and non-food items, health, water and sanitation, education, mine awareness, and economic recovery and infrastructure. The number of beneficiaries varies by sector, for example 205,000 in education or 770,000 in water and sanitation, assuming that donor support continues to be provided. 2. HUMANITARIAN ACTION BY SECTOR AND UN FOCAL POINTS The UN coordination focal point for PROTECTION is UNHCR. The UNHCR Protection team continues to monitor IDP movement and conditions via their VESTA monitoring teams operational in Ingushetia and recently in Chechnya. The UN is aiming to: ensure that IDPs have access to secure locations and humanitarian assistance, including freedom of movement and the right to remain in safe areas; promote the creation of conditions that allow voluntary return; ensure the IDPs have access to necessary legal documentation and are treated according to human rights standards; empower regional and federal authorities and NGOs to implement effective protection monitoring and intervention; and focus psychosocial assistance on the civilians who have mental health needs, including victims of sexual violence. Other organisations in the Northern Caucasus, such as the Council of Europe who have three observers based in the northern Chechen town of Znamenskoye, the ICRC with expatriates visiting places of detention in Chechnya, and the Russian human rights group Memorial, are also playing a vital role in attempting to identify and assist IDPs with protection-related problems. On 15 June 2001, the Organisation for Security and Humanitarian Action in the Northern Caucasus: Briefing Kit 3 Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) returned to Chechnya, and is now also located in the town of Znamenskoye. Like the Council of Europe, the OSCE indicates in its operational mandate that it will ‘promote respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the establishment of facts concerning their violation’. The UN coordination focal point for FOOD is WFP. In February 2000, WFP replaced UNHCR as the primary supplier of basic foods to IDPs while UNHCR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Panthera Pardus, Leopard
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T15954A5329380 Panthera pardus, Leopard Assessment by: Henschel, P., Hunter, L., Breitenmoser, U., Purchase, N., Packer, C., Khorozyan, I., Bauer, H., Marker, L., Sogbohossou, E. & Breitenmoser- Wursten, C. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Henschel, P., Hunter, L., Breitenmoser, U., Purchase, N., Packer, C., Khorozyan, I., Bauer, H., Marker, L., Sogbohossou, E. & Breitenmoser-Wursten, C. 2008. Panthera pardus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T15954A5329380. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T15954A5329380.en Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Carnivora Felidae Taxon Name: Panthera pardus (Linnaeus, 1758) Synonym(s): • Felis pardus Linnaeus, 1758 Regional Assessments: • Mediterranean Infra-specific Taxa Assessed: • Panthera pardus ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Engineering Research, volume 177 International Symposium on Engineering and Earth Sciences (ISEES 2018) Unique Natural Objects of Mountain Landscapes of the Chechen Republic Zaburayeva Kh.Sh. Gatsayeva L.S. Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov, Complex Research Institute named Kh.I. Ibragimov, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Oil and Gas Grozny, Russia Grozny State Oil Technical University [email protected] named M.D. Millionshchikov Grozny, Russia [email protected] Gayrabekov U.T. Dzhabrailov S.-E.M. Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Faculty of Geography and Geoecology Complex Research Institute named Kh.I. Ibragimov, Chechen State University Russian Academy of Sciences, Grozny, Russia Faculty of Geography and Geoecology [email protected] Chechen State University Grozny, Russia [email protected] Daukayev Asl.A. Sediyeva M.B. Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Complex Research Institute named Kh.I. Ibragimov, Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov, Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Academy of Sciences Department of Earth Sciences Grozny, Russia Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic [email protected] Grozny, Russia [email protected] Abumuslimova I.A. Department of Biological and Medical Studies Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic Grozny, Russia indira_anChechen [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Sector Field Directory
    HEALTH SECTOR FIELD DIRECTORY Republic of Chechnya Republic of Ingushetia Russian Federation June 2004 World Health Organization Nazran, Republic of Ingushetia TABLE OF CONTENTS ORGANIZATION 1. Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) 2. CARE Canada 3. Centre for Peacemaking and Community Development (CPCD) 4. Danish Refugee Council/Danish Peoples Aid (DRC/DPA) 5. Hammer FOrum e. V. 6. Handicap International 7. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) 8. International Humanitarian Initiative (IHI) 9. International Medical Corps (IMC) 10. Islamic Relief (IR) 11. International Rescue Committee (IRC) 12. Medecins du Monde (MDM) 13. Medecins Sans Frontieres – Belgium (MSF-B) 14. Error! Reference source not found. 15. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Holland (MSF-H) 16. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Switzerland (MSF-CH) 17. Memorial 18. People in Need (PIN) 19. Polish Humanitarian Organisation (PHO) 20. Save the Generation 21. SERLO 22. UNICEF 23. World Vision 24. World Health Organization (WHO) 2 Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) Sector: Health; Food; Non-Food Items; Education Location: Chechnya and Ingushetia Objectives: To render psychosocial support to people affected by the conflict; to provide specialised medical services for women and medical aid for the IDP population; to support education and recreational activities; to supply supplementary food products to vulnerable IDP categories with specific nutritional needs; to provide basic hygienic items and clothes for new-born; to help the IDP community to establish a support system for its members making use of available resources. Beneficiaries: IDP children, youth, women and men in Ingushetia and residents in Chechnya Partners: UNICEF, SDC/SHA CONTACT INFORMATION: INGUSHETIA Moscow Karabulak, Evdoshenko St.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Persons Who Wish to Seek Asylum in the Russian Federation
    INFORMATION FOR PERSONS WHO WISH TO SEEK ASYLUM IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION “Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in the other countries asylum from persecution”. Article 14 Universal Declaration of Human Rights I. Who is a refugee? According to Article 1 of the Federal Law “On Refugees”, a refugee is: “a person who, owing to well‑founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of particular social group or politi‑ cal opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country”. If you consider yourself a refugee, you should apply for Refugee Status in the Russian Federation and obtain protection from the state. If you consider that you may not meet the refugee definition or you have already been rejected for refugee status, but, nevertheless you can not re‑ turn to your country of origin for humanitarian reasons, you have the right to submit an application for Temporary Asylum status, in accordance to the Article 12 of the Federal Law “On refugees”. Humanitarian reasons may con‑ stitute the following: being subjected to tortures, arbitrary deprivation of life and freedom, and access to emergency medical assistance in case of danger‑ ous disease / illness. II. Who is responsible for determining Refugee status? The responsibility for determining refugee status and providing le‑ gal protection as well as protection against forced return to the country of origin lies with the host state. Refugee status determination in the Russian Federation is conducted by the Federal Migration Service (FMS of Russia) through its territorial branches.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMANITARIAN AID for the Victims of the Chechnya Conflict in the Caucasus
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID for the victims of the Chechnya conflict in the Caucasus GLOBAL PLAN 2007 Humanitarian Aid Committee – December 2006 ECHO/-EE/BUD/2007/01000 1 Table of contents Explanatory Memorandum page 1) Executive summary..................................................................................... 3 2) Context and situation.................................................................................. 3 2.1.) General Context.................................................................................... 3 2.2.) Current Situation.................................................................................. 4 3) Identification and assessment of humanitarian needs.............................. 5 4) Proposed DG ECHO strategy....................................................................... 8 4.1.) Coherence with DG ECHO´s overall strategic priorities.................... 8 4.2.) Impact of previous humanitarian response......................................... 9 4.3.) Coordination with activities of other donors and institutions............ 10 4.4.) Risk assessment and assumptions........................................................ 10 4.5.) DG ECHO Strategy.................................................................................11 4.6.) Duration............................................................................................. 12 4.7.) Amount of decision and strategic programming matrix..................... 13 5) Evaluation.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya
    Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya Egor Lazarev Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Egor Lazarev All rights reserved ABSTRACT Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya Egor Lazarev This dissertation explores how the social and political consequences of armed conflict affect legal pluralism; specifically, the coexistence of Russian state law, Sharia, and customary law in Chechnya. The study draws on qualitative and quantitative data gathered during seven months of fieldwork in Chechnya. The data include over one hundred semistructured interviews with legal authorities and religious and traditional leaders; an original survey of the population; and a novel dataset of all civil and criminal cases heard in state courts. First, the dissertation argues that armed conflict disrupted traditional social hierarchies in Chechnya, which paved the way for state penetration into Chechen society. The conflict particularly disrupted gender hierarchies. As a result of the highly gendered nature of the conflict, women in Chechnya became breadwinners in their families and gained experience in serving important social roles, most notably as interlocutors between communities and different armed groups. This change in women’s bargaining power within households and increase in their social status came into conflict with the patriarchal social order, which was based on men’s rigid interpretations of religious and customary norms. In response, women started utilizing the state legal system, a system that at least formally acknowledges gender equality, in contrast to customary law and Sharia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1222 RUS Khashiyev H/Exec Disappearance Cases
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND RULE OF LAW DIRECTORATE OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEPARTMENT FOR THE EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS H/Exec(2015)5 rev – 20 August 2015 ——————————————— Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russian Federation (No. 57942/00) group of cases Overview of the Court’s judgments concerning enforced disappearances in the North Caucasus Memorandum prepared by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights ——————————————— The opinions expressed in this document are binding on neither the Committee of Ministers nor the European Court. This document contains an overview of the judgments delivered by the European Court against the Russian Federation concerning enforced disappearances in the North Caucasus between 1999 and 2006 (Khashiyev and Akayeva group of cases). It also indicates the fate of the disappeared persons, where known, at the time of the examination by the European Court. 1 http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution/ 2 Case name Disappeared Facts as established by the Criminal investigation file, as Fate of disappeared persons Violations Application no. persons (name Court noted in the Court’s judgment as indicated in the Court’s found Date of definitive and year of birth) judgments (where known) judgment Bazorkina Mr Khadzhi-Murat The applicant’s son was Case no. 19112 opened on 14 July Unknown. Art. 2 69481/01 Yandiyev (1975) detained on 2 February 2000 2001 by the Chechnya Prosecutor’s (substantive 11/12/2006 by State servicemen during a Office under Article 126 § 2 of the and counter-terrorist operation in Criminal Code (aggravated procedural), the village of Alkhan-Kala kidnapping).
    [Show full text]
  • Russia the Ingush-Ossetian Conflict in the Prigorodnyi Region
    Russia Page 1 of 32 RUSSIA THE INGUSH-OSSETIAN CONFLICT IN THE PRIGORODNYI REGION Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch New York · Washington · London · Brussels Copyright © May 1996 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalogue Number: 96-75960 ISBN: 1-56432-165-7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is based on a trip to the Republic of Ingushetiya, hereafter Ingushetiya, and the Republic of North Ossetia- Alaniya, hereafter North Ossetia, both states of the Russian Federation, from August 11-19, 1994. Until 1994, North Ossetia was the North Ossetian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR), a part of the former Soviet Union. Until 1992, Ingushetiya was part of the Checheno-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR), and was also part of the former Soviet Union. Human Rights/Helsinki representatives visited Vladikavkaz, Kartsa, Chermen, Tarskoye, Kurtat, Dachnoye, and Maiskii in North Ossetia and Nazran and Gaziyurt in Ingushetiya. Jeri Laber and Rachel Denber edited the report, and Shira Robinson provided production assistance for its publication. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki thanks both North Ossetian and Ingush authorities as well as officials from the Russian Temporary Administration (now the Temporary State Committee) for their cooperation with the mission participants. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki would like to express our appreciation to all those who read the report and commented on it, including Prof. John Collarusso of McMaster University. We would also like to thank the members of the Russian human rights group Memorial, who provided generous assistance and advice. In 1994 Memorial published an excellent report on the conflict in the Prigorodnyi region, "Two Years after the War: The Problem of the Forcibly Displaced in the Area of the Ossetian-Ingush Conflict." Finally, we would like to thank the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Henry Jackson Fund, the Merck Fund and the Moriah Fund for their support.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 Moscow, May 2006 CONTENT Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 Summary...........................................................................................................................................5 Article 2 ..........................................................................................................................................14 Measures taken to improve the conditions in detention facilities .............................................14 Measures to improve the situation in penal institutions and protection of prisoners’ human rights ..........................................................................................................................................15 Measures taken to improve the situation in temporary isolation wards of the Russian Ministry for Internal Affairs and other custodial places ..........................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent torture and cruel and depredating treatment in work of police and other law-enforcement institutions ............................................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent cruel treatment in the armed forces ................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Text In
    The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS ISSN: 2357-1330 https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.470 SCTCMG 2019 International Scientific Conference «Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism» TRANSFORMATION OF THE REGIONAL ECONOMY FOR PRIVATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP Murat Bulguchev (a)*, Malika Yusupova (b), Musa Merzho (c), Aina Kostoeva (d) *Corresponding author (a) Ingush state University, 7, Zyazikova Av., Magas, 386101, Russia, [email protected], 89287300906. (b) Chechen State University, 32, Sheripova str., Grozny, 364024, Russia, [email protected], 89298995387 (c) Ingush state University, 7, Zyazikova Av., Magas, 386101, Russia, [email protected], 89888205111 (d) Ingush state University, 7, Zyazikova Av., Magas, 386101, Russia, [email protected], 89286976240 Abstract In the context of the economic law functioning, bread is literally needed by all. Its production should be organized so as to constantly meet the needs of the population. The study of the history of the village, the legal framework adopted in the country in recent decades, give reason to believe that there are features of a modern entrepreneur in the Russian peasant. Further formation of its business character will depend on the conditions created by society for motivated work, indirectly promoting economic policy in matters of parity pricing, improvement of the system of state support, etc. Despite a number of measures taken by the government to development of farming and to reorganize unprofitable collective farms, except for the allocation of land for the future individual economy, subsequent problems in the regions are not always solved in time. The proposed concept of development of private agricultural entrepreneurship based on group creation of peasant Enterprise in rural settlements would be appropriate in the allocation of land, the operation of agricultural machinery by farmers and other economic funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 232.22 Kb
    Danish Refugee Council ASF / Danish People’s Aid North Caucasus Situation Report No. 41 DRC/ASF PROGRAM OF EMERGENCY AND INTEGRATION ASSISTANCE TO THE VICTIMS OF THE ARMED CONFLICT IN CHECHNYA 30 September 2001 Latest developments On 31 August a spokesperson of the International Committee of Other News the Red Cross in Moscow said that more than 2,000 children from Chechnya have undergone mine awareness training, On 10 September Lecha Kadyrov, the nephew of the organized by the ICRC. She said this training program is head of the pro-Moscow civil intended for the Chechen children currently living in Ingushetia, administration was killed in who will have to return to Chechnya soon and may get Chechnya. His car came under confronted with this danger. She announced that the committee fire at about 10:00 am as Lecha had produced a puppet show on the basis of North Caucasian and three of his friends drove fairy tales specially for the Chechen children. from the settlement of Tsentoroy to Kurchaloy to On 18 September, the Head of pro-Moscow civil administration donate blood for Lecha's sister, who is undergoing treatment at of the Chechen Republic Akhmad Kadyrov started a 6-day the local hospital. Lecha working visit to the Middle East, Kadyrov’s press secretary Edi Kadyrov died immediately. Isayev reported. Kadyrov is expected to visit Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Iraq. He will meet a number of regional leaders, On 17 September, Russian including Husni Mubarak, Bashar Assad, King Abdallah II and Federal Security Service’s Saddam Hussein. The main objective of the trip was announced department in Chechnya reported that a technical as "demonstration of Chechnya’s true face to leaders of Middle description of the Boeing-737 East states." Kadyrov is accompanied by top Muslim clerics of jet and pilot’s manual had been Dagestan, Karachai-Cherkessia and Ingushetia.
    [Show full text]