DOCSLIB.ORG

Scrieri Vechi Pierdute Atingătoare De Dacia (Al.Papadopol-Calimah)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scrieri Vechi Pierdute Atingătoare De Dacia (Al.Papadopol-Calimah) AI. Papadopol-Calimah Scrieri vechi pierdute atin2atoare de Dacia COLEqIA BIBLIOTECA DACICA 2 AL. PAPADOPOL-CALIMAH SCRIERI VECHI PIERDUTE ATINGATOARE DE DACIA Editie lngrijitil de Aurora Petan DACICA Bucure§ti © Editura DACICA 2007 Sir. Tudor Arghezi nr. 21 020943 Sector 2 Bucure~ti/Romania Tel. 021-3121342, 0749-114711 e-mail: [email protected] www.dacica.ro Descrierea elP a Bibliotecii NationaIe a Rom&niei PAPADOPOL-CALIMAH, ALEXANDRU Scrieri vechi pierdute atingatoare de Dacia / AI. Papadopol-CaJimah; ed. ingrijitli de Aurora Petan. - Bucur~ti : Dacica, 2007 ISBN 978-973-88076-1-7 I. Petan, Aurora (ed.) 94(398.2) Coperta colecpei: arh. Marian Coman CUPRINS o carte a carpior pierdute despre daci ....................................... 11 Alexandru Papadopol-Calimah. Repere bio-bibliografice 21 _ olii asupra edipei .................................................................. 29 § l. Dio ...................................................................................... 32 § 2. Strabon ............................................................................... 33 § 3. Appian .............................................................. :................ 33 § 4. Caninius .............................................................................. 33 § 5. Hellanicus .......................................................................... 35 § 6-9. Agretas, Agathon, Ctesipus, Timonax ....................... 35 § 10-13. Pisander, Parmenion, Dexippus, Hecateu ............. 36 § 14. Ctesias .............................................................................. 36 § 15. Publius Ovidius Naso .................................................... 36 § 16. Tacitus .............................................................................. 42 § 17. Alexandru cel Mare ........................................................ 44 § 18-38. Istoricii lui Alexandru .............................................. 45 § 39. Quintus Curtius .............................................................. 46 § 40. Criton ............................................................................... 46 § 4145. Scymnos, Ephoros, Demetrios, Memnon .............. 47 § 46. Anaximenes din Lampsacos ......................................... 48 § 47. Alexandru ........................................................................ 48 § 48. Anacharsis ............................... ........................................ 49 § 49. Traian ............................................................................... 49 § 50-53. Istoricii lui Traian (Marius Maximus, Fabius Mar- cellinus, Aurelius Verus, Statius Valens) ............................. 50 5 § 54. Edictullui Traian (Edictum Traiani) .......................... .. 50 § 55-56. Octavius Augustus, Marcus Antonius .................... 51 § 57. Trogus Pompeius ............ ................................................ 52 § 58-59. Diodor din Sicilia, Polibiu ......................................... 53 § 60. Istoricii la care se referlt Pausanias .............................. 54 § 61-63. Ephoros, Choerilus, Diyllus .................................... 55 § 64-65. Calisthenes, Socrates - Istoricul .............................. 56 § 66. Sofode .............................................................................. 57 § 67-71. Poepi ciclici, Protesilaos, Arctinios, Sofocle, Eschil ......................................................... ~............... ... .............. 58 § 72-82. Porphyrios, lamblichsos, Libanius, Arbitio, Lollianus, Castor, Hylas, Sardonios, Sardatios, Menelaos, Aristarchos ................................................................................ 60 § 83. Menandru ......................................................................... 63 § 84-87. Agrippa, Cornelius Nepos, Statius Sebosus Quin- tus, MeteUus Celer .................................................................... 64 § 88. SaUustius ........................................................................... 65 § 89. Alexandru Peloplatonul ................................................. 65 § 90. Hippodromos Tessaliotul .............................................. 66 § 91-107. Autorii cita!i de Strabon .......................................... 66 § 108. Heradide Ponticul ......................................................... 67 § 109-110. Marcian HeradeotuI. Artemidor din Efes .......... 67 § 111. Dionysios Charax .......................................................... 67 § 112. Cornelius Alexandru Poliistorul ..... ............................ 68 § 113. Polyainos ........................................................................ 68 § 114. Timagetos ....................................................................... 68 § 115. Marcellus ........................................................................ 69 § 116. Clearchos .................................................................... .. .. 70 § 117. Ammianus Marcellinus ......................................... ....... 70 § 118-129. Autorii citap de lornandes .................................... 70 § 130-131. Criton, Samonicus .... ................................ .............. 73 § 132. Eudoxos .......................................................................... 75 § 133-134. Pliniu cel Batr:ln, Aufidius Bassus ....................... 75 § 135. lulian imparatul ............................................................. 76 § 136-137. lulianus Titianus, chartele geografice ................. 77 § 138-139. Vibius Sequester, Stephanos Bysantion .............. 77 § 140-141. Imparapi Tiberius ~i Claudius ............................. 78 6 § 142-143. Diagnotus ~i Beton ................................................. 80 § 144. Marin din Tyr ................................................................. 81 § 145. Agathargides sau Agatharchides Cnidios ................. 81 § 146. Diophantus ..................................................................... 82 § 147. Didymos ......................................................................... 82 § 148. Damastes ............. ...................... .... ............ ... ..... .............. 82 § 149. Pliniu eel Tanar .............................................................. 83 § 150. Democrit din Abdera .................................................... 83 § 151-158. Posis Magnesiotul, Hellanicos, Philochoros, Pherecydes, Herodoros, Bion, Menecrates, Clidemos ........ 84 § 159. Abaris .............................................................................. 84 § 160. Memnon .......................................................................... 85 § 161. Theoxenes ....................................................................... 85 § 162. Marcianos ....................................................................... 85 § 163. Callistrat .......................................................................... 86 § 164. Mnaseas ......................................................................... 86 § 165. Proteas Zeugmatitul ..................................................... 86 § 166-171. Cephalion, Castor, Thallos, Phlegon, Demon, Phavorinus ................................................................................ 86 § 172. Alypios ................................. ........................................... 87 § 173. Appolonides ................................................................... 87 § 174. Dionysios ........................................................................ 88 § 175. Velleius Paterculus ........................................................ 88 § 176. Simrnias ........................................................................... 89 § 177-178. Artemidoros, Marcianos ....................................... 89 § 179-180. Hecateu din Milet, Hecateu din Abdera ............. 89 § 181. Pisander .......................................................................... 90 § 182. Mysorum Iibri ................................................................ 90 § 183-184. Antonius Diogenes, Antiphanes .......................... 90 § 185. Candidus ........................................................................ 91 § 186. Dexippos ......................................................................... 91 § 187. Hippys (Hippon) Rbeginus ......................................... 92 § 188. Valerius Antias ........ ................. ..................................... 92 § 189-191. Teucros, Sylla, Lucullus ........................................ 92 § 192. Cicero ................ .. .. .......................................................... 94 § 193. Parthenios ....................................................................... 96 § 194. Crates .............................................................................. 96 7 § 195. Callistrates .................................................................. .... 96 § 196-197. Mnesimachos, Herenaias ...................................... 97 § 198. Titus Livius ..................................................................... 97 § 199-209. Protarchos Trallianos, Antimachos, Damastes, Metrodorosl Hierodes, Homer, Hesiod, Boeos, Simoni­ des, Olenus de la Lycia, Melanopus de la Cuma, Aristeas de la Proconnes .......................... .................................. ............. 99 § 210-222. Orfeu, Epimenide Cnossius, Cleon Curieus, Dionysius Mitilineul, Onomacriton, Herodoros, Valerius Flaccus, P. Terentius Varro, Euphorion de la Chalcis, Cornelius Gallus, Marianus ...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15Th-17Th Century) Essays on the Spread of Humanistic and Renaissance Literary (15Th-17Th Century) Edited by Giovanna Siedina
    45 BIBLIOTECA DI STUDI SLAVISTICI Giovanna Siedina Giovanna Essays on the Spread of Humanistic and Renaissance Literary Civilization in the Slavic World Civilization in the Slavic World (15th-17th Century) Civilization in the Slavic World of Humanistic and Renaissance Literary Essays on the Spread (15th-17th Century) edited by Giovanna Siedina FUP FIRENZE PRESUNIVERSITYS BIBLIOTECA DI STUDI SLAVISTICI ISSN 2612-7687 (PRINT) - ISSN 2612-7679 (ONLINE) – 45 – BIBLIOTECA DI STUDI SLAVISTICI Editor-in-Chief Laura Salmon, University of Genoa, Italy Associate editor Maria Bidovec, University of Naples L’Orientale, Italy Scientific Board Rosanna Benacchio, University of Padua, Italy Maria Cristina Bragone, University of Pavia, Italy Claudia Olivieri, University of Catania, Italy Francesca Romoli, University of Pisa, Italy Laura Rossi, University of Milan, Italy Marco Sabbatini, University of Pisa, Italy International Scientific Board Giovanna Brogi Bercoff, University of Milan, Italy Maria Giovanna Di Salvo, University of Milan, Italy Alexander Etkind, European University Institute, Italy Lazar Fleishman, Stanford University, United States Marcello Garzaniti, University of Florence, Italy Harvey Goldblatt, Yale University, United States Mark Lipoveckij, University of Colorado-Boulder , United States Jordan Ljuckanov, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria Roland Marti, Saarland University, Germany Michael Moser, University of Vienna, Austria Ivo Pospíšil, Masaryk University, Czech Republic Editorial Board Giuseppe Dell’Agata, University of Pisa, Italy Essays on the Spread of Humanistic and Renaissance Literary Civilization in the Slavic World (15th-17th Century) edited by Giovanna Siedina FIRENZE UNIVERSITY PRESS 2020 Essays on the Spread of Humanistic and Renaissance Literary Civilization in the Slavic World (15th- 17th Century) / edited by Giovanna Siedina. – Firenze : Firenze University Press, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Dioscorides Extended: the Synonyma Plantarum Barbara Autor(Es)
    Dioscorides extended: the Synonyma Plantarum Barbara Autor(es): Dalby, Andrew Publicado por: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra URL persistente: URI:http://hdl.handle.net/10316.2/45209 DOI: DOI:https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1721-3_1 Accessed : 11-Oct-2021 12:22:36 A navegação consulta e descarregamento dos títulos inseridos nas Bibliotecas Digitais UC Digitalis, UC Pombalina e UC Impactum, pressupõem a aceitação plena e sem reservas dos Termos e Condições de Uso destas Bibliotecas Digitais, disponíveis em https://digitalis.uc.pt/pt-pt/termos. Conforme exposto nos referidos Termos e Condições de Uso, o descarregamento de títulos de acesso restrito requer uma licença válida de autorização devendo o utilizador aceder ao(s) documento(s) a partir de um endereço de IP da instituição detentora da supramencionada licença. Ao utilizador é apenas permitido o descarregamento para uso pessoal, pelo que o emprego do(s) título(s) descarregado(s) para outro fim, designadamente comercial, carece de autorização do respetivo autor ou editor da obra. Na medida em que todas as obras da UC Digitalis se encontram protegidas pelo Código do Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos e demais legislação aplicável, toda a cópia, parcial ou total, deste documento, nos casos em que é legalmente admitida, deverá conter ou fazer-se acompanhar por este aviso. pombalina.uc.pt digitalis.uc.pt Série Diaita Carmen Soares Scripta & Realia Cilene da Silva Gomes Ribeiro ISSN: 2183-6523 (coords.) Destina-se esta coleção a publicar textos resultantes da investigação de membros do projeto transnacional DIAITA: Património Alimentar da Lusofonia. As obras consistem em estudos aprofundados e, na maioria das vezes, de carácter interdisciplinar sobre uma temática fundamental para o desenhar de um património e identidade culturais comuns à população falante da língua portuguesa: a história e as culturas da alimentação.
    [Show full text]
  • The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora
    THE REMAKING OF THE DACIAN IDENTITY IN ROMANIA AND THE ROMANIAN DIASPORA By Lucian Rosca A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Sociology Committee: ___________________________________________ Director ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Department Chairperson ___________________________________________ Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date: _____________________________________ Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University, Fairfax, VA The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at George Mason University By Lucian I. Rosca Bachelor of Arts George Mason University, 2015 Director: Patricia Masters, Professor Department of Sociology Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, VA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis coordinators: Professor Patricia Masters, Professor Dae Young Kim, Professor Lester Kurtz, and my wife Paula, who were of invaluable help. Fi- nally, thanks go out to the Fenwick Library for providing a clean, quiet, and well- equipped repository in which to work. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables................................................................................................................... v List of Figures ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FRONTIER IDENTITIES Roman Villa and Settlement Excavation and Survey
    LIFE BY THE IMPERIAL ROAD - FRONTIER IDENTITIES Roman Villa and Settlement Excavation and Survey IDENTITY AND WEALTH: ROMAN PROVINCIAL LANDSCAPE STRATEGIES Rapolt, Transylvania, Romania June 7 - July 4; July 20 - August 1, 2020 During the Roman colonial occupation, southern Transylvania shows a very dynamic and intensive synthesis of Roman provincial life, where a multitude of processes of colonization and creolization take place side by side. Prior to the Roman conquest of 102AD, it was also the most densely populated region of the Dacian Kingdoms. Our project seeks to explore the integration of all the structural provincial elements present along the main Roman axes of communication and transport. Our research area is in the immediate proximity of both the imperial road and the Mures River, the extremely important gold deposits of the Carpathian Gold Moutains, and the political and military centers of Sarmizegetusa Ulpia Traiana and Apulum. We will continue the excavation of the well preserved structures, including a villa rustica of palatial size, identified during our 2013-2019 field seasons. Our 2020 excavation and survey will aim at understanding the importance and impact of the proximity of the main axis of movement, communication and commerce on the Roman provincial rural life, and its evolution through time, as well as the local processes of identity creation. Our participants will participate to the villa excavation, geochemical and geophysical survey, Duration: 4 week sessions STP survey and laboratory analysis. This Costs: US$1695 for each 4-week session extraordinary environment with its associated It includes: monuments and material culture, combined with excavation registration, taxes, fees lectures and spectacular surrounding natural landscapes and most gear beautiful Transylvanian churches and castles, housed as guests of Romanian families in a guarantees all students and volunteers with a highly beautiful traditional Transylvanian village full room and board, Monday-Friday rewarding archaeological and cultural experience.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: 11-09-2006 I, Mark Andrew Atwood, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts in: The Department of Classics It is entitled: Trajan’s Column: The Construction of Trajan’s Sepulcher in Urbe This work and its defense approved by: Chair: Peter van Minnen William Johnson Trajan’s Column: The Construction of Trajan’s Sepulcher in Urbe A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Classics of the College of Arts and Sciences 2006 By MARK ANDREW ATWOOD B.A., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 2004 Committee Chair: Dr. Peter van Minnen Abstract Eutropius (8.5.2) and Dio (69.2.3) record that after Trajan’s death in A.D. 117, his cremated remains were deposited in the pedestal of his column, a fact supported by archeological evidence. The Column of Trajan was located in urbe. Burial in urbe was prohibited except in certain circumstances. Therefore, scholars will not accept the notion that Trajan overtly built his column as his sepulcher. Contrary to this opinion, I argue that Trajan did in fact build his column to serve as his sepulcher. Chapter 1 examines the extensive scholarship on Trajan’s Column. Chapter 2 provides a critical discussion of the relevant Roman laws prohibiting urban burial. Chapter 3 discusses the ritual of burial in urbe as it relates to Trajan. Chapter 4 identifies the architectural precedent for Trajan’s Column and precedent for imperial burials in urbe.
    [Show full text]
  • By CHRISTER BRUUN King Decebalus of the Dacians Has His
    THE LEGEND OF DECEBALus· By CHRISTER BRUUN 1. Introduction King Decebalus of the Dacians has his given place in the series of great en­ emies of Rome, a series including names such as Hannibal, Viriathus, lugur­ tha, Mithridates, and Boudicca. Classicists working in many different fields are today very much aware of the king: epigraphers, art historians who ad­ mire Trajan's Column in Rome, students of Roman military history, scholars who write about the emperor Trajan, and - why not - those with an interest in anthropology who study the ancient practice of beheading enemies or col­ lecting their heads. 1 Decebalus is also of obvious interest to those who focus on the province of Dacia, and - true to the topic of this volume - the relations between the imperial centre and one of the last provinces to be acquired by Rome will be explored in this paper by means of an investi­ gation of what I call "the legend of Decebalus". In other words, this study concerns how the memory of King Decebalus lived on in a somewhat different form in Dacia than it did elsewhere. The interest of modem anthropologists in the fate of the Dacian king was of course spurred by the sensational presentation by Professor Michael P. Speidel of the "autobiography" of the "Captor ofDecebalus" in 1970. The funerary inscription commemorating the career of the Roman cavalry officer Ti. Claudius Maximus contains a dramatic description of how Decebalus ended his life: quod cepisset Decebalu(m) et caput eius pertulisset ei Ra- • For helpful comments in Leiden I wish to thank in particular J.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Continuity in Geto-Dacian Foreign Policy
    69 HIRUNDO 2008 Pattern of Continuity in Geto-Dacian Foreign Policy Under Burebista Paul Vădan Following the death of Alexander the Great, the ancient world was affected by prolonged po - litical turmoil as many states emerging after 323 BC, both within and without Alexander’s former Em - pire, sought to impose their regional hegemony at each other’s expense in an attempt to restore stability. In the context of such discourse in power politics, the Geto-Dacian state emerged and sought to assert itself in the Carpathian-Danubian-Pontic region under the rule of Burebista in the 1 st century BC. De - spite modern claims that Burebista’s achievements were without precedent in the history of Geto-Dacia, 1 this paper will attempt to place the rule of Burebista in the context of a long tradition of Geto-Dacian foreign policy of assertion and interaction with the Hellenistic οιкоυµένη (oikoumene the perceived Greek world as opposed to barbarian lands). In order to do this, we will need to analyze Burebista’s political and economic goals in order to determine whether his rule conformed to an established pattern. Unfortunately, such a project is ir - reparably flawed because no Geto-Dacian written accounts (if there were any) have survived; all that has been passed on to us in terms of literary “evidence” are approximately four hundred Geto-Dacian words that are still in use in the Romanian language. As a result, scholars are forced to appeal exclu - sively (and with caution) to Greek and Roman written sources if they are to construct a generally co - herent history of the Geto-Dacians.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXIII No 2 2017 the UNWRITTEN HISTORY in OUR TEXTBOOKS Elen
    International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXIII No 2 2017 THE UNWRITTEN HISTORY IN OUR TEXTBOOKS Elena-Tereza DANCIU University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania [email protected] Abstract: In his book “The Dacians”, Hadrian Daicoviciu showed that “only a few pages have been preserved of the great book of this people’s ancient history; dozens of pages, undoubtedly among the most interesting, were lost forever and many, perhaps even more interesting, were never written by ancient authors”. There is a text that keeps coming to my mind very often, especially lately, because I have noticed that there is a tendency to remove or skip several pages of our history. The mission of a historian is to try to find out the historical truth with as many pages as possible. We should not overlook, we should not mitigate anything from our past. The lost or unwritten pages of history hinder this mission, it is true, but what should we do about the pages that were written and, deliberately, are not included in the history books? Keywords: history, ancient, pages, textbooks, historical truth 1. The history of the Geto-Dacians - a Isidore of Seville wrote about Spain “where paradox of the foreign and Romanian the glorious fecundity of the Getic genius medieval historiography flourished”. Alfonso X el Sabio, King of 1.1. Are the Geto-Dacians the ancestors Spain, wrote in his book Cronica General of the Scandinavian peoples? about Dacia or Gothia, about Zamolxis who I will never understand why we “was greatly wise in philosophy”, about intentionally fragment historical truth.
    [Show full text]
  • EPIGRAPHIC FORGERIES in TRANSYLVANIA (15Th–18Th CENTURIES) (I)
    EPIGRAPHIC FORGERIES IN TRANSYLVANIA (15th–18th CENTURIES) (I) MONICA DRAGOSTIN* Abstract: In this article the author intends to analyze epigraphic forgeries regarding the history of Dacia, from a perspective that takes into account the context that favored their emergence and proliferation. Late 15th century and early 16th century represent the heyday of literary forgeries in the Hungarian Kingdom. Political propaganda, local patriotism and the passion for ancient manuscripts make up a mix of history and myth, of true and false, melted all in the aestheticized humanism of the Renaissance. Keywords: epigraphic forgeries, humanism, manuscripts, patriotism, myth. “Any forger, however deft, imprints the pattern and texture of his own period’s life, thought and language on the past he hopes to make seem real and vivid1.” The subject of fake inscriptions2 was addressed only incidentally by Romanian historiography, usually in studies focused on other topics, and mainly from a normative perspective. Being limited to the simple identification and condemning of forgeries, these studies did not allow progress in the comprehension of a practice highly prevalent at the beginning of modern epigraphic investigation. There are a few possible explanations for the historians’ lack of interest towards forgeries. Firstly, the classicists and the epigraphists have considered that their mission ends at telling the fake from the authentic. Secondly, the weak liaison between modern and ancient age specialists has led to the ignoring of certain documents that involve the knowledge of two historical periods: the one in which the forgery was done and the one that the forgery refers to3. All in all, the historiographical work of Transylvanian scholars has been more or less ignored in * Centre Régional Francophone de Recherches Avancées en Sciences Sociales (CEREFREA); e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • From Augustus to Marcus Aurelius
    IMPERIAL REPRESENTATIONS OF CLEMENTIA IMPERIAL REPRESENTATIONS OF CLEMENTIA: FROM AUGUSTUS TO MARCUS AURELIUS By JESSICA V ARL, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Jessica Yah!, August 2007 MASTER OF ARTS (2007) McMaster University (Classics) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Imperial Representations of Clementia: from Augustus to Marcus Aurelius AUTHOR: Jessica Vahl, B.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Michele George NUMBER OF PAGES: vii, 78 11 ABSTRACT This thesis examines imperial representations of clementia from the time of Augustus to Marcus Aurelius. Since there is, to my knowledge, no study devoted exclusively to the examination of clemency's appearance in the material culture, it is meant to round out the study of the virtue's place in the Roman world by examining its depiction on the imperial monuments. With each consideration of a clemency scene, the thesis has three aims. 1) To set up the socio-political and historical context of the era and how the scene is reflective of or in response to that. 2) To examine the iconography in detail and to compare and contrast the scene to earlier or contemporary representations of clemency. 3) To consider the intent behind the production ofthe scene and intended viewer reaction. The study finds that an emperor used clemency to strengthen his position and to gain support from the people and the elite. It was also an opportunity to show the superiority and might of Rome, while depicting the enemy as defeated and begging for mercy.
    [Show full text]
  • Life by the Imperial Roads
    LIFE BY THE IMPERIAL ROAD Roman Provincial Excavation and Survey ROMAN PROVINCIAL LANDSCAPE STRATEGIES Rapolt, Transylvania, Romania May 31 – July 4, 2015 During the Roman colonial occupation, southern Transylvania shows a very dynamic and intensive synthesis of Roman provincial life, where a multitude of processes of colonization and creolization take place side by side. Prior to the Roman conquest of 102AD, it was also the most densely populated region of the Dacian Kingdoms. Our project seeks to explore the integration of all the structural provincial elements present along the main Roman axes of communication and transport. Our research area is in the immediate proximity of both the imperial road and the Mures River, the extremely important gold deposits of the Carpathian Gold Moutains, and the political and military centers of Sarmizegetusa Ulpia Traiana and Apulum. We will continue the excavation of the well preserved structures, including a villa rustica, identified during our 2013 and 2014 field seasons. Duration: 5 weeks (2 weeks minimum) Costs: US$1575 for 5 weeks ($450/week for shorter stays). It includes: Our 2015 excavations will aim at understanding x Excavation registration, taxes, fees the importance and impact of the proximity of the main and most gear axis of movement, communication and commerce on the Roman provincial rural life, and its evolution through x Housed as guests of Romanian time. This extraordinary environment with its associated families in a beautiful traditional monuments and material culture, combined with Transylvanian village spectacular surrounding natural landscapes and beautiful x Full room and board – Monday-Friday Transylvanian churches and castles, guarantees all students and volunteers with a highly rewarding 72$33/< archaeological and cultural experience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sun Worship with the Romanians
    THE SUN WORSHIP WITH THE ROMANIANS DOINA IONESCU, CRISTIANA DUMITRACHE Astronomical Institute of Romanian Academy Str. Cutitul de Argint 5, 40557 Bucharest, Romania Email: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. We summarize the main aspects of the solar cult with the Romanian people and the populations that lived on their territory. We highlight the origin of the solar cult and its evidence with the ancestors of the Romanians, the Dacians, as well as its manifestations in present popular art and other aspects of Romanians life. Key words: astronomy history, Sun. 1. INTRODUCTION The Sun, our day star, has always impressed people all over the world, who included it in their cultures. The Sun gives warmth, light, life and therefore it is associated with a powerful symbolism in all forms of culture. There are many stud- ies concerning the worshipping of the Sun in different cultures such as the ancient Egyptian, Aztec, Asian, Greek, as well as in the European countries. We note here the book of Bhatnagar and Livingston (2005), that presents a nice review of solar worship all over the world. One can speak about the existence of a solar cult on the territory of Romania beginning with ancient times, more precisely with the Neolithic. This cult was taken over by the Romanians ancestors, called the Getae-Dacians, and it has continued to exist until nowadays. First, let us say a word about the ancient inhabitants of Romania. The hearth of present day Romania was initially inhabited by the Getae, a branch of the Thra- cians, a people of Indo-European origin who were archaeologically attested on the territory between the Balkan Mountains (South), The Forest Mountains (North), the Black Sea shore (East) and beyond the river Siret (West).
    [Show full text]