Nucleus and Gene Expression Editorial Overview Elisa Izaurralde and Phillip D Zamore
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Nucleus and gene expression Editorial overview Elisa Izaurralde and Phillip D Zamore Current Opinion in Cell Biology 2009, 21:331–334 Available online 14th May 2009 0955-0674/$ – see front matter # 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.04.013 Elisa Izaurralde That most information flows from DNA through RNA to protein remains the Department of Biochemistry, Max-Planck- organizing principle of modern molecular biology. Thus we begin this issue Institute for Developmental Biology, with an introduction to DNA replication by Mike O’Donnell and Nina Yao. Spemannstrasse 35, D-72076 Tu¨ bingen, Germany They describe the composition and function of the replisome, the machine e-mail: [email protected] that organizes activities at the replication fork, highlighting the unique challenges solved in the evolution of DNA replication proteins. Not only Elisa Izaurralde leads the does the replisome coordinate DNA copying on the leading and lagging Department of Biochemistry at the strands, it also allows the replication apparatus to skip over DNA lesions and Max Planck Institute for to pass a transcribing RNA polymerase without interrupting either tran- Developmental Biology in Tu¨ bingen, scription or replication. Germany. Her research focuses on the molecular mechanisms that Initiating transcription at the right place, at the right time, and in the right regulate gene expression at the cells is, of course, the primary challenge of gene regulation. Timothy post-transcriptional level, with Sikorski and Stephen Buratowski identify a key paradox in initiating mRNA particular emphasis on mRNA transcription: a conserved set of transcription initiation proteins are used to surveillance, decay, and silencing in recruit a common RNA polymerase, RNA Pol II, to many different tran- scription initiation sequences (promoters). They describe our current un- animal cells. derstanding of how eukaryotes solve this problem, describing the Phillip D Zamore experimental support for distinct initiation pathways for different promoter types. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, Not all transcription is productive. Synthesis in yeast of seemingly futile United States cryptic unstable transcripts (CUTs), which are copied from intergenic DNA, e-mail: [email protected] underscores the truism that eukaryotic solutions to biological problems are often wasteful. CUTs are typically marked for destruction while still in the Phillip D Zamore is an investigator nucleus, where they are degraded by the nuclear exosome complex [1,2]. of the Howard Hughes Medical The late Dmitry Belostotsky reviews the function and mechanism of the Institute and the Gretchen Stone nuclear and cytoplasmic exosomes, complex assemblies of ribonucleases and Cook Professor of Biomedical other proteins that control RNA stability, participate in 30-end processing of Science in the Department of structured RNAs and in post-transcriptional gene silencing, as well as Biochemistry and Molecular provide quality control for RNA processing, folding, and RNP assembly. Pharmacology at the University of Belostotsky also reviews the growing number of noncoding transcript classes Massachusetts Medical School in whose RNAs are widely distributed across the genome, yet whose abun- Worcester, MA, USA. His laboratory dance suggests that like CUTs, they are degraded nearly as rapidly as they studies how small RNAs guide are made. silencing of gene expression in plants, fungi, and animals and how At the opposite end of the continuum of RNA stability lie highly stable, these RNA silencing pathways can structural RNAs, many of which regulate transcription globally or locally. be used to design novel therapies Among the most intensively studied are xist and its complementary counter- for human disease. part tsix. Jennifer Chow and Edith Heard describe how xist, tsix, and a host of protein factors act sequentially to silence one of the two X chromosomes in mammals. As females have twice as many X chromosomes as males, such X chromosome inactivation serves to equalize the expression of X-linked www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Cell Biology 2009, 21:331–334 332 Nucleus and gene expression genes between the sexes. (In flies, an unrelated structural a housekeeping gene required for snRNP assembly. RNA, roX, acts to upregulate the single X chromosome in snRNAs participate in pre-mRNA splicing as protein– males, allowing its single-copy X-linked genes to catch up RNA complexes whose production requires a remarkable with the corresponding two copies of each gene in number of assembly proteins. Utz Fischer describes our females [3].) The study of X inactivation in mammals current understanding of how SMN protein, as a com- promises to inform our understanding of the more general ponent of the multiprotein SMN complex, acts to facili- problem of mono-allelic gene expression, whose role in tate the assembly of Sm proteins onto the U snRNAs in titrating mRNA production to appropriate levels remains the cytoplasm. The final step in snRNP assembly is the poorly understood. conversion of the 7-monomethyl guanosine cap of the U snRNA into a 2,2,7-trimethyl guanosine cap, permitting Most of the genome is transcribed in eukaryotes — per- its reimportation into the nucleus, where it can participate haps 90% in humans — although just a small percentage in pre-mRNA splicing. The devastating phenotype of encodes proteins. Some of these noncoding transcripts spinal muscular atrophy, thought to reflect the disruption pair to form double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) or are copied of splicing patterns of a subset of mRNAs particularly into dsRNA by RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Such important for neurons, underscores the importance of dsRNA can be the source of endogenous small interfering snRNP assembly. RNAs (endo-siRNAs) that silence protein-coding genes in trans. In plants, a specialized DNA-dependent RNA Errors in pre-mRNA splicing often produce mRNAs with polymerase, RNA Pol IV, transcribes endo-siRNA-gen- diminished coding potential. When these aberrant tran- erating loci involved in RNA-directed DNA methylation. scripts contain premature stop codons, a specialized qual- Marjorie Matzke and colleagues review our current un- ity control mechanism, the nonsense-mediated decay derstanding of the mechanism, genetics, and biological (NMD) pathway, ensures their destruction before they function of RNA-directed DNA methylation. They can produce aberrant, potentially toxic, protein. Indrani describe our current understanding of how plant RNA Rebbapragada and Jens Lykke-Andersen evaluate the polymerases specialized to transcribe ‘silent’ chromatin evidence supporting prominent explanations for how participate in siRNA production and how such endo- the NMD pathway distinguishes between premature siRNAs, in turn, act on chromatin and DNA. They and appropriate stop codons. One intriguing model is remind us that most RNA-guided silencing mechanisms that premature stop codons reside in regions of the in plants later found parallels in animals, so a thorough mRNA bearing a distinct complement of RNA-binding understanding of the RNA Pol IV mechanism may ulti- proteins deposited during nuclear pre-mRNA splicing, mately lead us to its animal analog. but sensed in the cytoplasm during a ‘pioneer round’ of translation — that is, the initial transit of the mRNA by a In most eukaryotes, the primary transcripts of nearly all ribosome. protein-coding genes are mainly intervening sequence (introns), punctuated by coding segments (exons). The Roy Parker and colleagues continue the theme of RNA pre-mRNA splicing pathway removes introns and joins degradation. They explain that high rates of translational exons from such pre-mRNA transcripts, thus assembling a initiation and mRNA turnover are inversely related: functional mRNA appropriate for export to the cyto- proteins that promote translational initiation discourage plasm. Correctly identifying splice sites is essential to mRNA destruction, whereas proteins that bind the this process. Both splice site identification and the sub- mRNA cap but do not recruit translational initiation sequent breaking and joining of phosphodiester bonds factors, as well as proteins that promote decapping, requires the spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) repress protein synthesis, and redirect the mRNA to U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6, or their equivalents in the specialized RNA–protein granules called processing or ‘minor’ spliceosome. Beyond simply removing introns, P bodies. Here, mRNAs can be degraded or stored for pre-mRNA splicing expands the genic repertoire of later re-entry into the actively translated pool. mRNAs eukaryotes by allowing a single gene to encode alterna- stalled in the process of translation also accumulate in tive forms of a single protein or alternative mRNA regu- stress granules. The movements of mRNAs among poly- latory sequences or both. Such alternative splicing is somes, P bodies, and stress granules are poorly under- thought to occur in most human genes. Britta Hartman stood. Moreover, as Parker and colleagues note, we do not and Juan Valca´rcel summarize our current understanding yet understand why mRNAs that have exited the poly- of how successful alternative splicing expands the num- some pool should accumulate in granules, since cells ber of functions encoded by our genes and how failures of unable to form such structures can