DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Bahrain's Opposition and the 2014 Parliamentary Elections Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Bahrain's Opposition and the 2014 Parliamentary Elections Brief Bahrain’s opposition and the 2014 Parliamentary Elections Bahrain’s opposition and the 2014 Parliamentary Elections Brief Bahrain’s national democratic opposition societies will currently not Be partaking in the 2014 parliamentary elections. Although this is not the preferred position, due to their ongoing insistence of working within the system proactively for political reform, a lack of positive movements from the authorities render this position unavoidable. The powers of the elected parliament have in fact regressed during the past four years, and other outstanding concerns remain unaddressed. Meanwhile human rights violations remain flagrant and senior opposition figures continue to Be held Behind Bars, many of whom should Be accommodated into a political process. The Bahrain Government suffers from an acute crisis of legitimacy and the opposition must work to alter this, without alienating the people of Bahrain who have committed themselves to democratic change. Background Al Wefaq National Islamic Society came into inception in 2001 following the National Action Charter that permitted opposition political societies. A founding core of the society is to promote democratic reform through the transition to a genuine constitutional monarchy, engaging within the system to do so. It did not participate in the 2002 parliamentary elections, following the King’s reneging on the National Action Charter with the unilateral imposing of a new constitution that granted little power to the elected chamBer of Parliament1. However, in 2006 Al Wefaq did take part in the elections gaining 16 of the 40 seats2. In 2010 they gained two further seats affirming its position as the largest Bloc in the parliament3. In FeBruary 2011 mass protests took place across Bahrain, calling for greater democracy. They were Brutally crushed4; to this date more than 1005 protesters have Been killed either in detention or By heavy-handed violence from the security forces. In response all 18 of Al Wefaq’s MP’s resigned from parliament, refusing to legitimise the repression of peaceful protests6. Along with the treatment of protesters, Al Wefaq has complained over a lack of powers held By the elected chamBer of parliament, with the power of veto offered to Both the unelected shura council and the King himself. Furthermore, their MP’s, Both whilst in and out of parliament, criticized the inability to hold ministers to account, particularly over issues relating to corruption. In addition to the nature of the parliament Al Wefaq has descriBed the electoral system as “gerrymandered”, in order to ensure the opposition can never take hold of a majority in parliament. 1 http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67553/jane-kinninmont/Bahrains-re-reform-movement?page=show 2 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/26/AR2006112600280.html 3 http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/10/23/us-bahrain-elections-fb-idUSTRE69M0TO20101023 4 http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2011/02/201121714223324820.html 5 http://www.tasnimnews.com/English/Home/Single/373903 6 http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=44626 Al Wefaq National Islamic Society – OctoBer 2014 1 Bahrain’s opposition and the 2014 Parliamentary Elections An election is not dialogue Since the Beginning of the current political crisis in 2011, Al Wefaq has regularly pushed for a political dialogue with the authorities7, in order to reach agreement over a reform plan that can provide a solution. There have Been various attempts at doing this, with each having failed to ever truly get off the ground. Whilst there are some within the royal family who accept the need to negotiate a solution, the powerful hard-line Bloc, centred on the Prime Minister, have worked to undermine any talks By widening human rights abuses. For them, the only solution to the crisis is repression of the popular demands. Previous dialogue failures • March 2011 – Following 3 weeks of protest, Bahrain’s Crown Prince came forward and proposed a 7 point plan to discuss with the opposition8. The plan included: 1. Parliament will full powers 2. A government that represents the will of the people 3. Fair voting constituencies 4. Citizenship issues 5. Anti-corruption 6. Selling of state properties 7. Addressing sectarianism These seven principles are in fact very close to the general demands of the Bahraini people and make up the BackBone of the oppositions “Manama Document” that outlines their aspirations for a democratic Bahrain9. Therefore the opportunity was positively responded to By the opposition, But this chance was immediately taken away when the following day the King invited Saudi troops into the country to crush protests10. • July 2011 – The first “national consensus dialogue” Began in July 2011 following the ending of the emergency martial law. It was clear from early on that this would not Be following on from the principles of the Crown Prince and failed after just a few days. The opposition received just 5 seats at the table, out of the 300 in total, revealing how heavily weighted it would Be against the opposition. Just a few months later, during the opening of the 66th General AssemBly, President OBama called for “meaningful dialogue” in Bahrain11, as a signal that the dialogue of July 2011 was far from realising this. 7 http://alwefaq.net/cms/2014/02/09/26690/ 8 http://alive.in/bahrain/blog/2011/03/13/crown-prince-asserts-that-the-right-of-security-and-safety-is- above-all-other-considerations-and-that-the-legality-to-claim-must-not-be-at-the-expense-of-security- staBility/ 9 alwefaq.net/cms/2011/10/12/5934/ 10 www.nytimes.com/2011/03/15/world/middleeast/15Bahrain.html?pagewanted=all 11 bahrainjdm.hopto.org/2011/09/21/president-obama-calls-for-meaningful-dialogue-and-peaceful-change- for-bahrain/ Al Wefaq National Islamic Society – OctoBer 2014 2 Bahrain’s opposition and the 2014 Parliamentary Elections • February 2013 – September 2013 – Despite regular calls from the opposition for a dialogue it took 18 months for it to finally arrive Back on the agenda. A new “national dialogue” was set up that was much smaller in size and initially provided some promise. However, no agreement was ever reached upon even an agenda or the make-up of the table. More importantly it was portrayed By the Authorities as Being Between the communities of Bahrain, whilst the Government stands aside and mediates. This was rejected By the opposition who felt the serious power Brokers in the country had to Be engaged in order for it to Be worthwhile. In SeptemBer 2013, after the arrest of Khalil Almarzooq a leading figure of Al Wefaq, the opposition suspended their involvement and it was formally ended in DecemBer 2013. • January 2014 – Crown Prince re-emerges – At the Beginning of this year there was some potential promise when the Crown Prince met with Sheikh Ali Salman, Al Wefaq Secretary General. They agreed to meet to discuss how to reignite a dialogue process, although little progress has since Been recorded. The main sticking point has Been the failure of the authority as a whole to endorse this process, leaving the Crown Prince in a position of acting on his own Behalf, rather than the authority as a whole. The international community, urging Both sides to come together in this regard, has supported the call for dialogue. What is clear is that an electoral process cannot Be a suBstitute for a dialogue. A dialogue is a step outside of the establishment, in order to review Best practices and to seek common agreement. An election is nothing more than a continuation of the current system and only legitimises the status quo, rather than challenging it. The people of Bahrain have underlined their rejection of this state of affairs and an election will not fix Bahrain’s proBlems. In order for a successful election to take place, a dialogue must come first that can address the issues of why the majority of the population feel unrepresented and alienated By the current system. Although some argue that engaging in parliament will give the opposition the opportunity to lay forward their demands, their experience of 5 years in parliament is contrary to this idea. 1) Weak parliamentary powers When Al Wefaq withdrew from parliament in 2011 they cited an inability to hold ministers to account. Since then this has taken a further step Back. In August 2014 the current parliament voted to weaken itself, agreeing a proposal to change how a Minister can Be summoned. Previously only a simple majority was needed, But this is changing to an absolute majority meaning 27 out of the 40 MP’s will Be needed in order to summon a Minster for questioning. In addition a commission must also Be formed to determine whether or not the question is in fact “valid”12. So whilst the 12 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:oR5lGWzZwxQJ:m.gulf-daily- news.com/NewsDetails.aspx%3Fnewsid%3D378449+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk (article removed from Gulf Daily News But availaBle as a cached version.) Al Wefaq National Islamic Society – OctoBer 2014 3 Bahrain’s opposition and the 2014 Parliamentary Elections powers the parliament held previously were weak, they have now Become even weaker, despite promises to make democratic reforms. Beyond the current attempts to weaken the parliament, the original make-up leaves much to Be desired. Bahrain has a Bi-cameral electoral system, the elected Council of Representatives and the unelected Shura Council, appointed By royal decree. Both chamBers hold equal weight, But the Shura Council is appointed By an unaccountable and unelected government, thereBy leaving no space to question the appointments. In practical terms this allows the government to handpick its supporters to sit in the upper house, acting as a stalwart against any legislation coming from the elected chamBer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POLICY and PREJUDICE Shia Divisionism in Bahrain Toward
    POLICY AND PREJUDICE Shia Divisionism in Bahrain Toward Completion of the MALD degree at: The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University Student: Pia Sawhney Date: May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. SUMMARY 3 B. INTRODUCTION i. The Volatile Political Climate in Bahrain and Shia Public Opinion 7 ii. Demographic Portrait 10 iii. Primary Concerns 12 C. POLITICAL BACKGROUND i. Recent Events: An Overview 14 ii. Historical Context 21 iii. King Hamad’s Reign 25 iv. The 1973 Constitution, the National Charter and Bahrain’s Judiciary 29 v. A Legacy of Shia Disempowerment 32 D. LAND AND LABOR REFORMS i. Restricted Lands and Housing Shortages 37 ii. Battling Unemployment 40 E. GERRYMANDERING 47 F. LITERATURE REVIEW i. Waves of Democratization 52 ii. Developing Transnational Networks 54 iii. Winning the Information War 55 iv. The Local-Global Framework 59 G. CONCLUSION 61 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________2 TITLE: POLICY AND PREJUDICE – SHIA DIVISIONISM IN BAHRAIN AUTHOR: PIA SAWHNEY A. SUMMARY In early 2011, demonstrations erupted across the Arab world in an unprecedented fashion and revealed how powerful globalizing forces can weaken strong and even otherwise impervious states.1 Nations that experienced widening political revolutions shared a singular, significant trait—all had governments that were either monarchial or autocratic in structure. They were also situated for the most part in the Arabian Gulf and the Maghreb. Youth and pro-democracy movements that took hold also flared up on the Persian Gulf island of Bahrain, which has had the same ruling monarchs in power since 1783. A tiny archipelago of 33 islands in one of the world’s geostrategic oil belts, Bahrain is a nation that relies heavily on revenues from oil refining, industrial enterprises, banking and financial services.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analysis Volume 6, Issue 1 Jan/Feb 2014
    Counter Terrorist Trends and Analysis Volume 6, Issue 1 Jan/Feb 2014 Annual Threat Assessment SOUTHEAST ASIA Myanmar, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia and Singapore SOUTH ASIA Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka EAST AND CENTRAL ASIA China and Central Asia MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Egypt, Libya and Somalia INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM RESEARCH S. RAJARATNAM SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2 ANNUAL THREAT ASSESSMENT Terrorism and Political Violence in 2013 Southeast Asia peace talks were held in January 2014. Iraq, too, remains besieged by sectarian violence and constant attacks. In Yemen, Southeast Asia has seen some of its insurgencies and conflicts multiple insurgencies and a robust threat from Al Qaeda in the diminish while others have continued unabated. In Thailand, the Arabian Peninsula have hampered an already difficult political restive south continued to see violence in 2013 while Bangkok transition. In Egypt, Morsi’s ouster has seen protests continuing witnessed a political crisis with protests against the government to plague the country while the military attempts another turning violent. In Myanmar, reforms have moved forward but political transition. Libya, meanwhile, faces a persistent security communal violence continues to plague the country and has challenge in its southern border region and the success of its evolved from targeting Rohingyas towards Muslim minority transition after Gaddafi will depend on the militias which communities in general. Indonesia continues to face a potent deposed the former dictator giving up their arms. In Somalia, threat from radicalization and concern has emerged over the al-Shabaab has intensified its campaign against the role its “hard” counterterrorist approach is playing in fueling government in the wake of a hardline faction emerging further extremism.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheikh Qassim, the Bahraini Shi'a, and Iran
    k o No. 4 • July 2012 o l Between Reform and Revolution: Sheikh Qassim, t the Bahraini Shi’a, and Iran u O By Ali Alfoneh The political stability of the small island state of Bahrain—home to the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet—matters to the n United States. And Sheikh Qassim, who simultaneously leads the Bahraini Shi’a majority’s just struggle for a more r democratic society and acts as an agent of the Islamic Republic of Iran, matters to the future of Bahrain. A survey e of the history of Shi’a activism in Bahrain, including Sheikh Qassim’s political life, shows two tendencies: reform and t revolution. Regardless of Sheikh Qassim’s dual roles and the Shi’a protest movement’s periodic ties to the regime in Tehran, the United States should do its utmost to reconcile the rulers and the ruled in Bahrain by defending the s civil rights of the Bahraini Shi’a. This action would not only conform to the United States’ principle of promoting a democracy and human rights abroad, but also help stabilize Bahrain and the broader Persian Gulf region and under- mine the ability of the regime in Tehran to continue to exploit the sectarian conflict in Bahrain in a way that broadens E its sphere of influence and foments anti-Americanism. e Every Friday, the elderly Ayatollah Isa Ahmad The Sunni ruling elites of Bahrain, however, l Qassim al-Dirazi al-Bahrani, more commonly see Sheikh Qassim not as a reformer but as d known as Sheikh Qassim, climbs the stairs to the a zealous revolutionary serving the Islamic pulpit at the Imam al-Sadiq mosque in Diraz, d Bahrain, to deliver his sermon.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitical Realignments
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. Competing Visions of the State Political and Security Trends in the Arab World and the Middle East Highlights from the conference 19-20 January 2012, Ottawa Think recycling This document is printed with environmentally C friendly ink FSC World Watch: Expert Notes series publication No 2010-09-02 This report is based on the views expressed by presenting experts and other participants at a conference organised by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service as part of its academic outreach program.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain: Reform Shelved, Repression Unleashed
    Bahrain: reform shelved, repression unleashed amnesty international is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the universal declaration of human rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. first published in 2012 by amnesty international ltd peter Benenson house 1 easton street london WC1X 0dW united Kingdom © amnesty international 2012 index: mde 11/062/2012 english original language: english printed by amnesty international, international secretariat, united Kingdom all rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. for copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo : police try to restrain a suspected protester during clashes in the Bahraini capital, manama, 21 september 2012. © epa/maZen mahdi amnesty.org Bahrain 1 Reform shelved, repression unleashed BAHRAIN: REFORM SHELVED, REPRESSION UNLEASHED CONTENTS 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................2 2. Investigations into past torture and use of excessive force .............................................5 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain: Civil Society and Political Imagination Contents
    Research Paper Jane Kinninmont and Omar Sirri Middle East and North Africa Programme | October 2014 Bahrain: Civil Society and Political Imagination Contents Summary 2 Introduction 3 Political Disputes and Failed Dialogues 7 Bahraini Civil Society, Youth and Informal Political Processes 16 The International Context 28 Conclusions 33 About the Authors 36 Acknowledgments 36 1 | Chatham House Bahrain: Civil Society and Political Imagination Summary • Bahrain’s political crisis continues, following the failure of dialogue efforts since 2011. That crisis is not only damaging the country’s economy and social fabric; it is also contributing to a deepening of sectarian tensions and an increased risk of violence. • The failure of the dialogue efforts to date is radicalizing the opposition and weakening the reformist elements within the government. At the same time, tight restrictions on freedom of association, speech and political activity are not silencing the most vocal and radical of the political opposition; rather, they are squeezing out the very moderates with whom the authorities will eventually need to work if they are to reach a sustainable political resolution to the crisis. • Because of the stalemate, many Bahrainis expect the future of their country to be determined by the government’s interactions with larger powers – especially the United States, Iran and Saudi Arabia – adding to the sense of disempowerment among the population. But those countries have many other priorities; and it is unclear whether they have a clear vision for the future of Bahrain. • Despite the stalling of the formal dialogue, Bahrain’s traditionally active civil society could make a valuable contribution to sincere efforts to reach a political resolution – if, that is, it were given the political space to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • House Foreign Affairs Committee Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission
    House Foreign Affairs Committee Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission Briefing on Bahrain: 2018 Elections June 10, 2018 - 10:00 a.m. 2255 Rayburn House Office Building Statement of Michael Payne Director of Advocacy Americans for Democracy & Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB) In May 2011, former President Barack Obama said that “mass arrests and brute force are at odds with the universal rights of Bahrain’s citizens, and such steps will not make legitimate calls for reform go away. The only way forward is for the government and opposition to engage in a dialogue, and you can’t have a real dialogue when parts of the peaceful opposition are in jail.”1 Yet more than seven years later, the Government of Bahrain has not just jailed parts of the opposition – it’s dismantled it entirely. Ahead of the parliamentary elections set for this fall, Bahraini authorities have closed virtually all space for peaceful political dissent – and the United States (US) has rubberstamped repression with new arms sales. While Bahrain is technically a constitutional monarchy, near-absolute political power is concentrated in the Al Khalifa ruling family, and its members hold almost all key posts. The parliament, known as the National Assembly, is deeply hamstrung and lacks the authority to serve as a check on the ruling family. All members of the upper house are appointed by the king, and the government has engaged in a host of electoral abuses – including gerrymandering, voter fraud, and the outright dissolution of political opposition groups – to ensure that the elected lower house is not representative.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry
    www.pomed.org ♦ 1611 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 300 ♦ Washington, DC 20009 Implementation of the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry Report Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission Hearing Rayburn House Office Building – 2237 2120 Rayburn, Washington, D.C. 20515 Wednesday, August 1, 2012, 1:00pm-3:00pm On Wednesday, the U.S. House of Representatives Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission held a hearing on the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry (BICI). The hearing consisted of three panels. The first panel featured Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR). The second panel featured Michael H. Posner, Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. The third panel consisted of: Matar Ebrahim Matar, former member of Bahrain’s Parliament; Leslie Campbell, senior associate and regional director of the Middle East and North Africa Programs at the National Democratic Institute; Tom Malinowski, Washington director of Human Rights Watch; and Richard Sollom, deputy director of Physicians for Human Rights. Members present were Co-Chairman Rep. James McGovern (D-MA), Rep. James Moran (D-VA), Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), and Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN). In his opening remarks Rep. James McGovern stressed that the BICI reforms remain incomplete, and expressed concern “that some of the most important recommendations – in particular, the recommendations calling for accountability at all levels of the chain of command for human rights abuses, the release of individuals who have only engaged in peaceful political expression, and integration of all Bahraini communities into the security forces – have not been implemented.” While noting the close security relationship between the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain: Change of the Regime Or Changes Within the Regime?
    Bahrain: Change of the Regime or Changes within the Regime? The 14th February Uprising opposition of all shades was in agreement with Bahrain has been witnessing an uprising since the uprising, despite differences on the agenda 14th February 2011, the eruption of which had and means of protests. been signaled by a call on Facebook two weeks The first days of the uprisings (14–17 before. The call promoted two slogans: one, that February) witnessed increasingly dramatic the protests should be of a peaceful nature; and developments, which led to an unprecedented two, that the aim is to topple the regime. Both situation in the country. None of the concerned demands were in line with their precedents parties, neither the opposition nor the security in Tunisia and Egypt, and with the popular establishment, government or the general public expected such a large turnout of protesters amid tight security measures. Tens of Despite the peaceful nature thousands showed up in defiance. Despite the of the protests, it was quelled peaceful nature of the protests, it was quelled with ruthless force resulting in with ruthless force resulting in deaths and tens deaths and tens of causalities of causalities among the protesters. The funeral among the protesters. of a victim at Al-Daih village east of the island’s capital Manama on 15th February was massive. Thousands advanced towards the so-called expression “The People want the downfall of Lulu (eng: Pearl) roundabout1 in Manama. the regime“ (ash-sha’b yurid isqat al-nizam). The call came from anonymous persons, but thousands of Bahrainis supported it on the Facebook group entitled “14th February Bahrain Revolution”.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain's Compliance with the International Covenant on Civil And
    121st Session – ICCPR State of Bahrain Shadow Report submitted by Salam for Democracy and Human Rights Gulf Institute for Democracy and Human Rights Bahrain Forum for Human Rights Bahrain’s Compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 24 July 2017 Introduction The Government of Bahrain ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Convention against Torture (CAT), and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). However, despite its ratification of the international treaties and commitment to defend human rights, the brutal human rights abuses have been continuously reported. A worrying new set of methods repressing the human rights of the Bahraini citizens has come into practice. The government have continued to curtail civil rights, particularly freedoms of expression, association and assembly through various unlawful measures. By revoking nationality of more than 350 Bahrainis, the government has been wielding ‘citizenship’ as a weapon of control and oppression. It has also criminalised freedom of assembly and expression, by implementing unnecessary restraints and inappropriate regulations on peaceful assembly. Prison officers; who had not given any proper training on the lawful use of force, have physically assaulted a number of detainees. The security apparatus, also, has continued to use torture to extract false confessions. Regrettably, children have been no exception from becoming victims of human rights abuses, and have been routinely detained without clear charges, which often results in ill-treatment on a serious level. Assessment Article 6. Death Penalty Bahrain ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) on September 20, 2006 (Opening sentence).
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain: Reform, Security, and U.S. Policy
    Bahrain: Reform, Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs November 6, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 95-1013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Bahrain: Reform, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary The uprising that began in Bahrain on February 14, 2011, at the outbreak of the uprisings that swept several Middle Eastern leaders from power, began a political crisis that has defied resolution. The crisis since 2011 has been more intense than previous periods of unrest in Bahrain, and demonstrates that the grievances of the Shiite majority over the distribution of power and economic opportunities have not satisfied by reform efforts instituted since 1999. The bulk of the Shiite majority in Bahrain says it demands a constitutional monarchy in which an elected parliament produces the government, but many in the Sunni minority government of the Al Khalifa family believe the Shiites want outright rule. In March 2011, Bahrain’s government rejected U.S. advice by inviting direct security assistance from other Gulf Cooperation Council countries, declaring a state of emergency, forcefully suppressing demonstrations, and arresting dissident leaders and pro-opposition health care workers. Although the state of emergency ended on June 1, 2011, a “national dialogue” held in July 2011 reached consensus on only a few modest political reforms. Hopes for resolution were raised by a pivotal report by a government-appointed “Independent Commission of Inquiry” (BICI) on the unrest, released November 23, 2011, which was critical of the government’s actions against the unrest as well as the opposition’s dismissal of all of the government’s reform proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngos Call for the Immediate Release of Al-Wefaq General-Secretary Shaikh Ali Salman
    NGOs Call for the Immediate Release of Al-Wefaq General-Secretary Shaikh Ali Salman On 28 December 2014, Bahraini authorities arrested Shaikh Ali Salman, Secretary-General of Al-Wefaq Political Society. The Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR), Americans for Democracy for Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB), and the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD) strongly condemn the Bahraini government’s detention of Shaikh Salman for his peaceful political activities and his work as a leader of the largest opposition political party in Bahrain. The undersigned NGOs are extremely concerned for the well-being of Shaikh Salman, and fear that his arrest will lead to the further deterioration of the human rights situation and may strengthen extremism in the country. On the morning of 28 December, Shaikh Ali Salman went to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) after receiving a summons from the Ministry of Interior (MOI) following the conclusion of Al-Wefaq's General Assembly conference, which the MOI had banned. On the morning of 28 December, Shaikh Salman went to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), where he was arrested and interrogated. The CID refused his lawyers entry twice before eventually granting one lawyer access to Shaikh Salman’s interrogation. Shaikh Ali Salman and his lawyer were told that the CID would transfer him to the Office of the Public Prosecution. However, according to available information, he was never taken to the Public Prosecution and the MOI has ordered his ongoing detention. Shaikh Ali Salman’s lawyers stated that he is accused of inciting hatred against the government, calling for the government the regime using force, religiously sanctioning youths to disobey the government, insulting the judiciary and the executive power, inciting hatred against an unspecified group of people, seeking external support, broadcasting false information and news that may cause panic, and breaching security and participating in gatherings and protests causing economic harm.
    [Show full text]