DOCSLIB.ORG

Sir Anthony (Derrick) Parsons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sir Anthony (Derrick) Parsons SIR ANTHONY (DERRICK) PARSONS Interview Index. 2. Early life to 1954. Army. Studying Arabic and Turkish at Oxford. Entering FO. 3-4. Turkey and Jordan, 1955-60. Comments on local politics. (See also 17). 4-5. Press work in Cairo. Diplomatic relations with Nasser. 5-6. Refuses to head Middle East section of Information Research Department. 6-7. American Department. Cuban Missile crisis (calm reaction of Home). 7-10. Sudan. Local politics. Royal visit. 10-12. Bahrain, 1965-9. Local politics. 1967 war. British 'East of Suez' withdrawal. 13. Comments on Michael Stewart as Foreign Secretary. 13-14. United Nations 1969-71. 14. Assistant Under-Secretary, 1971-4. 14-18. Iran, 1971-9. The Shah. The Economy. Rising discontent. US colleagues. 18. Comments on Baghdad Pact meeting and Iraqi unrest in 1958. 18-19. Deputy Under-Secretary. 19-25. Ambassador to UN: Zimbabwe settlement (19-21); Namibia (22); Falklands War (22- 25). 25-28. Working with Thatcher, 1982-3. Personal relationship. Role in Downing Street. 28-29. Changes in the diplomatic service during his career. 1 British Diplomatic Oral History Project Jane Barder interviewing Sir Anthony Parsons on 22nd March 1996 at home in Devon. JB: Sir Anthony retired from the Diplomatic Service in 1982 as Permanent Representative at the United Nations in New York. Post retirement he worked as a Special Adviser on Foreign Affairs to the Prime Minister, Mrs. Thatcher, from 1982 to 1983. He was appointed LVO in 1965, CMG in 1969, KCMG in 1975, GCMG in 1982. He was born in 1922; he was educated at Kings School, Canterbury and Balliol College, Oxford; and then I think you were in the Army when you went to Oxford - were you not? AP: I was meant to go up to Oxford probably in 1940 when I was 18, but I went into the Army instead, like millions of the rest of us did, and at the end of the War I was seconded to the Palestine Government for three years and left in that disastrous scuttle we had from Palestine in 1948. I found myself still stuck with a Commission in the Army; I couldn't get out. Then I discovered to my great joy that the Army were prepared to release me from military duty to go back to Oxford, because my education there had been interrupted for a couple of years, and take a degree. I wanted to do English literature, but when I suggested this to the local General, who was interviewing me, he exploded and said that he wasn't going to let me go to Oxford and leave my military duties in order to learn poetry; and was there anything I could do that would be useful to the Army? So I said I knew Arabic, because I had been working in Arabic for the previous three years; so he said: very well, if you study Arabic then I'll let you go to Oxford if you can get yourself a place in the Oriental Studies School there, which I did. So I went to Balliol, the college which I would have gone to anyway if it hadn't been for the War, and I read Oriental Studies with Arabic and Turkish being my two languages. I was then stuck with another two or three years in the Army to work off the release from military duties that I had had. So after some argument about whether I should go back to Regimental duties I signed a piece of paper saying I forfeited all promotion beyond the rank of Major provided that I was permanently seconded to intelligence duties. So I went to the Embassy in Baghdad as Assistant Military Attaché, where I played out my time and had an extremely interesting job there; and then I joined the Diplomatic Service from there, having learnt all about it, as an over-age entry. JB: That was in 1954. 2 AP: Yes, that was in 1954. JB: Then you just spent a year in the Office and then went back to use your Turkish. AP: Yes, I spent a year in the Office and then one day I met the Head of Personnel in the corridor and he said: it’s about time we sent you somewhere in Europe; and I thought: that's fine; they will send me to Paris or Rome or somewhere like that and before I knew where I was I was in Ankara, obviously because of my Turkish. I was for four years the principal Turkish speaker in the Chancery of the Embassy in Ankara and taking pretty well all the political papers and also having special responsibility for studying the Turkish domestic situation. It was a fascinating time to be in Turkey because the country was in a kind of reverse transition - Ata Türk had secularised it, twenty years before; he had changed the Turkish language from the Arabic script to the Latin, changed the dress from traditional dress and so on and had made a determined resolution to transform Turkey into a western European Country; but by the time I was there Ata Türk's party had been thrown out of power and the Democratic Party, which was in power, was very much based in voting terms on the countryside and small provincial towns, which were, of course, still very traditional in their outlook. So you had a situation where in the big cities like Ankara and Istanbul and also in the Armed Forces you had the firm belief in Ata Türk's revolution and secularisation but the Government was putting a lot of money into building new mosques and that kind of thing; and so traditional Islam was beginning to return in the countryside and in the small towns and villages; you had this dichotomy between an European country, because of the revolution, and the re-emergence of a traditional Islamic country in part of the population. It was also, of course, in the period of four years during which the whole of the Middle East was more or less aflame. We had Nasserism sweeping the area, putting monarchies and pro-Western regimes at risk all the way from Egypt to the Persian Gulf. You had this clash between Iraq on the one hand and Egypt for pre-eminence in the Middle East. We had the Suez aberration which affected Turkey a great deal. Syria nearly went Communist. The Iraqi monarchy was brought down in a bloody revolution in 1958. British troops landed in Jordan and American troops landed in the Lebanon. And all through this period the main preoccupation in the Embassy was the Cyprus problem. These were our last years in Cyprus and we were trying to decolonize the country without creating either major inter-communal strife or even worse an actual inter-state war between Greece and Turkey, both members of NATO. We succeeded in the latter, but not in the former. 3 JB: That was a four year posting; and then you went to Jordan? AP: Then I went to Jordan. By 1959 when I was to leave Turkey (in any case I had been there too long for a First Secretary), Syria and Egypt were united in the UAR and the idea was that I would go and open up a Consulate General in Damascus subordinate to Cairo; but the resumption of diplomatic relations with Egypt /Syria kept on drifting into the distance - they had broken with us after Suez, of course - and so I was sent to Jordan, really in order to wait until Damascus opened up. That didn't happen; the whole thing dragged and so I went off to Cairo for 18 months or so. JB: What as? Still First Secretary? AP: Again I was kind of Oriental Secretary in Cairo - technically, I think, I was called the Press Attaché - but my main job again was to study the Egyptian internal political situation through the medium of the Press; because Egypt in those days was very very strictly controlled, a police state, and it was rather like being in a Communist country. You had to get your information through interpretation of what was coming out in the public media. That was one of my principal jobs, God help me. When I got to the office in the morning my first duty was to read all the Arabic newspapers and periodicals, not from cover to cover obviously, not the Art pages and that kind of thing, but all the political pages and the leaders, so I could inform some people of what was going on, not only in domestic terms but also in terms of foreign policy, because Egypt was at the time leading the newly born non-aligned movement between the two blocs - Nehru, Nasser, Nkrumah, Tito were the four originators of the non-aligned movement. "Non-aligned" to us in Cairo in those days seemed to be a process of giving the Soviet Union the benefit of every doubt and never giving the West benefit of any doubt! But still it was presented as non-alignment between the two blocs and there was some truth in that. And that was an exciting time because we were trying to resume full diplomatic relations, which we only got just before I left in the late summer of 1961. JB: So what did you have until then - a Chargé or a British Interests Mission? AP: We started out as a Trade Mission and then we became a Diplomatic Mission and then eventually in the spring of '61, I suppose it must have been, we got full diplomatic relations back.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55
    Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd i 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East Louise Kettle 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiiiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Louise Kettle, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/1 3 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3795 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3797 4 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3798 1 (epub) The right of Louise Kettle to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iivv 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Learning from History 1 Learning from History in Whitehall 3 Politicians Learning from History 8 Learning from the History of Military Interventions 9 How Do We Learn? 13 What is Learning from History? 15 Who Learns from History? 16 The Learning Process 18 Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • George Brown Den Britiske Utenrikspolitikkens Dr. Jekyll Og Mr
    Linn Sagøy Varmdal Linn Sagøy Varmdal George Brown Den britiske utenrikspolitikkens Dr. Jekyll og Mr. Hyde Et innblikk i George Browns tid som utenriksminister, med fokus på hans diplomatiske innsats i Egypt Masteroppgave George Brown, den britiske politikkens Dr. Jekyll og Mr. Hyde Jekyll og Mr. Dr. politikkens den britiske Brown, George Masteroppgave i Historie Veileder: Tore T. Petersen NTNU Trondheim, juni 2017 Det humanistiske fakultet Det humanistiske Institutt for historiske studier historiske for Institutt Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet teknisk-naturvitenskapelige Norges Forord Veien til en masteroppgave ble litt mer kronglete enn hva jeg først hadde tenkt. Med en bacheloroppgave om allianser i middelalderens Skottland, var det ingen som ble mer overrasket enn meg selv da jeg tok en «fast-forward» 650 år frem i tid og forkastet alle ambisjoner om å bli en middelalderhistoriker. Geografisk er øya den samme og temaet er fortsatt av politisk omfang, men samfunn og holdninger er blitt betydelig endret. Jeg tiltrekkes fortsatt av individets plass i historien og kunne i dag aldri tenkt meg å ikke kunne fått lov til å formidle George Browns forsøk på storhet. Vestens påvirkning i Midtøsten har aldri vært så aktuell som den er i dag, og denne oppgaven har gitt meg en helt annen forståelse for konfliktforholdet som eksisterer i dette området nøyaktig 50 år etter Seksdagerskrigen. Som seg hør og bør er det mange som skal takkes, bukkes og neies for, som har bidratt til at de siste to årene har vært mulig å gjennomføre. Kjære Tore Petersen, du har vært fantastisk tålmodig som veileder. Det finnes mange flotte ordtak om hvordan tålmodighet lønner seg i lengden, men siden vi har hatt flere runder med den faktiske betydningen av ulike metaforer, så velger jeg å frastå bruken av billedspråklige framstillinger denne gang.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth P. Maccallum, the Canadian Department of External Affairs, and the Palestine Mandate to 1947 By
    The Outsider: Elizabeth P. MacCallum, the Canadian Department of External Affairs, and the Palestine Mandate to 1947 by Richard Newport A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Carleton University Ottawa, Canada © 2014 Richard Newport i Abstract Elizabeth Pauline MacCallum was Canada’s leading expert on the Middle East in the first part of the twentieth century. From 1925 to 1935, as a research analyst and author for the Foreign Policy Association (FPA), she gained international recognition for her scholarship on the problems and challenges confronting the Middle East and the British Mandate in Palestine, the central ground of dispute between the Arab and Jewish peoples. MacCallum joined Canada’s Department of External Affairs (DEA) in 1942, not as a regional specialist, but as a wartime clerk. Where there had been previously no clear official thinking regarding the Middle East, MacCallum, using a combination of expertise and persistence, slowly gained recognition among her peers for her understanding of the region. The purpose of this thesis is to examine MacCallum’s ideas about the Middle East by investigating the foundation, development, and substance of her ideas about the region. The thesis also identifies the role that she played in the Department of External Affairs and interrogates the manner in which she applied her ideas as a member of the DEA. In particular, this study assesses her part in the making of Canada’s first policy towards the Middle East, which came together in 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FIGHT of BENJAMIN POGRUND These Publications Became Illegal
    Volume XXVII No. 5 May, 1972 INFORMATION ISSUED BY THE ASSOOAnOM OF JiWISH REFUGEES IN GREAT BRITAIN Margot Pottlitzer personally with people who have a con­ tribution to make, but who lack the time or the inclination to put it down on paper. We are particularly interested in reports REVIEWING OUR PAST from people outside London, as their experiences are bound to be more varied An Important New Venture and often more interesting in view of their closer contacts with their non-refugee In a few months' time it will be forty are compelling reasons for doing it now: environment. y^ars since the National Socialists came to If the history of the emigrants from Ger­ The history of the Jews from Germany P°*er in Germany. The SOth January, many is to be written at all, it will to a forms an integral part of Jewish history as ^33, will forever mark a turning point in large extent be based on the evidence pro­ a whole. What we are trying to achieve, oiodern European history. What happened vided by those who were part of it, and will in all probability not be the definite on that day was to aflfect the lives of count­ they are not getting any younger. The version—we are still too close in time to ess men, women and children and of framework is there: The extemal circum­ the events for that to be possible. It will, S^nerations yet unborn; to us, above all, it stances, the laws and regulations that however, provide the future historian with jnarked the opening of the last chapter of governed the life of a refugee from the the basic elements for his evaluation of ^^ history of Jews in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • ASPECTS of SOUTH YEMEN's FOREIGN POLICY L967-L982 by Fred Halliday Department of International History London School of Economic
    ASPECTS OF SOUTH YEMEN'S FOREIGN POLICY L967-L982 by Fred Halliday Department of International History London School of Economics and Political Science University of London Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 1985 Thesis Abstract This study analyses the foreign relations of South Yemen (since 1970 the People's Democratic Republic of Yemen) from independence in 1967 until 1982. It covers the first four Presidencies of the post- independence period, with their attendant policy changes, and ends with the resolution of two of the more pressing foreign policy conflicts with which South Yemen was concerned, its support for the guerrillas in North Yemen, who were defeated in the spring of 1982, and its conflict with the Sultanate of Oman, with whom diplomatic relations were concluded in October 1982. Chapter One provides an outline of the background to South Yemen's foreign policy: the outcome of the independence movement itself and the resultant foreign policy orientations of the new government; the independence negotiations with Britain; and the manner in which, in the post-independence period, the ruling National Front sought to determine and develop its foreign policy. The remaining four chapters focus upon specific aspects of South Yemen's foreign policy that are, it is argued, of central importance. Chapter Two discusses relations with the West - with Britain, France, West Germany and the USA. It charts the pattern of continued economic ties with western European states, and the several political disputes which South Yemen had with them. Chapter Three discusses the issue of 'Yemeni Unity' - the reasons for the continued commitment to this goal, the policy of simultaneously supporting opposition in North Yemen and negotiating with the government there, and the course of policy on creating a unified Yemeni state.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain and the Development of Professional Security Forces in the Gulf Arab States, 1921-71: Local Forces and Informal Empire
    Britain and the Development of Professional Security Forces in the Gulf Arab States, 1921-71: Local Forces and Informal Empire by Ash Rossiter Submitted to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Arab and Islamic Studies February 2014 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Abstract Imperial powers have employed a range of strategies to establish and then maintain control over foreign territories and communities. As deploying military forces from the home country is often costly – not to mention logistically stretching when long distances are involved – many imperial powers have used indigenous forces to extend control or protect influence in overseas territories. This study charts the extent to which Britain employed this method in its informal empire among the small states of Eastern Arabia: Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the seven Trucial States (modern day UAE), and Oman before 1971. Resolved in the defence of its imperial lines of communication to India and the protection of mercantile shipping, Britain first organised and enforced a set of maritime truces with the local Arab coastal shaikhs of Eastern Arabia in order to maintain peace on the sea. Throughout the first part of the nineteenth century, the primary concern in the Gulf for the British, operating through the Government of India, was therefore the cessation of piracy and maritime warfare.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Parker T. Hart
    Library of Congress Interview with Parker T. Hart The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR PARKER T. HART Interviewed by: William R. Crawford Initial interview date: January 27, 1989 Copyright 1998 ADST Q: Peter, what got you into the Foreign Service? HART: While I was nearing the end of my sophomore year in college at Dartmouth, I began to wonder what I was going to major in for my junior and senior years. A Rotary friend of my father—my father was a strong Rotarian in Boston—happened to sit with me at a dinner one evening and he asked me what I was going to do when I got out of college. I said, “I haven't the slightest idea.” He said, “What do you like to do?” I told him I liked to travel. I had had quite a lot of travel due to the generosity of my father and had gone on some rather remarkable trips by that time. So I told him that that's what I would like to do. He said, “Why don't you go into the Foreign Service?” I said, “What is it?” He then told me a little about it and said that he thought there was a booklet on examinations given. So when I got back to Dartmouth, I talked to my student counselor Interview with Parker T. Hart http://www.loc.gov/item/mfdipbib000484 Library of Congress and he brought out a copy of an old examination record which they published in those days.
    [Show full text]
  • Far Apart but Close Together
    1 Far Apart but Close Together A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of the Career Structure and Organisational Culture of the Post-War British Diplomatic Service. Michael J. Hughes and Roger H. Platt Abstract A good deal has been written about the organisation and structure of the British diplomatic establishment since 1945. This paper seeks to use detailed quantitative and qualitative data to help develop an understanding of the background and career trajectories of the most senior figures in the Diplomatic Service in 1975. By tracing their careers it is possible to identify more precisely than before the changing educational and social background of these individuals when compared with previous generations of diplomats. The paper also examines certain core features of the culture of the diplomatic establishment during the post-war decades, analysing how it both shaped and was shaped by particular structures and practices. The paper argues that, despite the existence of a peripatetic career structure that dispersed members of the diplomatic establishment around the globe, there were still numerous opportunities for the kinds of personal contact necessary to maintain an integrated culture. 1 2 During the three decades following the end of the War against the Axis powers, British governments faced a complex and evolving set of issues when managing their country’s external relations. Although both the nature and extent of British ‘decline’ has been questioned by historians,1 the unmistakeable shift in global hard power towards the two
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Thatcher's Falklands Crisis Benjamin F
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2015 Climbing the Mountain of Conflict: Margaret Thatcher's Falklands Crisis Benjamin F. Waldman Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Waldman, Benjamin F., "Climbing the Mountain of Conflict: Margaret Thatcher's Falklands Crisis" (2015). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 1112. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1112 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE ‘CLIMBING THE MOUNTAIN OF CONFLICT’ MARGARET THATCHER’S FALKLANDS CRISIS SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR LILY GEISMER AND PROFESSOR ILAI SALTZMAN AND DEAN NICHOLAS WARNER BY BENJAMIN FINE WALDMAN FOR SENIOR THESIS FALL 2014 & SPRING 2015 APRIL 27, 2015 This page intentionally left blank. 2 Acknowledgements This project required the help of more people than I can thank here, especially those friends forced to sit through countless white board lessons on the Royal Navy’s fleet of jump jets or the various intricacies of British politics, which seem to fascinate only me. Professor Ilai Saltzman provided terrific help as a reader, ensuring I answered an actual question in my thesis. Naturally, I am inclined to compose a work entirely of interesting but loosely connected anecdotes, and he was instrumental in guiding me towards something more significant. Professor Lily Geismer deserves acknowledgement far beyond her incredibly helpful work as an adviser for this project. She has been the most significant academic influence on me in my four years of college. Any competency I’ve achieved as a writer, I owe to her years of dedicated teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Harold Macmillan and the Middle East Crisis of 1958
    Proceedings of the British Academy, 94, 207–228 ELIE KEDOURIE MEMORIAL LECTURE Harold Macmillan and the Middle East Crisis of 1958 WILLIAM ROGER LOUIS University of Texas Fellow of the Academy ELIE KEDOURIE’S ANALYSIS of Britain and the Middle East was always based on meticulous and detailed research. But the distinction of his work lay in his critical and sustained examination of assumptions and calculations, and in his belief that British ministers and officials must be held accountable for their decisions. He was fully aware that the evidence could be read in different ways. Elie Kedourie’s own assump- tion was that nothing was inevitable. My lecture this afternoon draws inspiration from his idea that the British in the aftermath of the Suez Crisis had choices, and that the consequences of initial decisions would be determined in part by further choices or decisions. In this process individuals and individual style played a major part. In the case of Harold Macmillan it is possible to view his ideas in 1956 as an alternative to those pursued by Anthony Eden, the Prime Minister, and to study the way in which Macmillan attempted in 1958 not to repeatEden’smistakes.MycommentsarebasedinpartontheMac- millan Diaries, which are not yet in the public domain though they along with Macmillan’s other papers have been deposited in the Bod- leian.1 I should also at the outset mention that I had an ulterior motive Read at the Academy 22 October 1996. q The British Academy 1997. 1 I am indebted to Alistair Horne for allowing me to read the copies of the Macmillan Diaries in his possession.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAY, Sir John Walton David, KBE
    BDOHP Biographical Details and Interview Index Sir John Walton David GRAY KBE 1995; CMG 1986. Born 1 October 1936. Married 1957, Anthoula Yerasimou. Educated at Blundell's School and Christ's College, Cambridge. National Service, 1954-56. Career (with, on right, relevant pages in interview) Entered Foreign Office 1962 pp 2-3 Middle East Centre for Arabic Studies 1962 pp 3-5 Bahrain 1964 p 5 FO (Defence Dept., then Egypt Desk) 1967 pp 5-7 UK Mission to UN, Geneva 1970 pp 7-9 (See pp 8-9 on CSCE) Sofia 1974 pp 9-14 Counsellor (Commercial) 1978; then Counsellor and Head of Chancery 1980, Jeddah pp 14-23 Head of Maritime, Aviation and Environment Dept 1982 pp 23-28 Ambassador to Beirut 1985 pp 28-36 Ambassador and UK Permanent Rep. to OECD, Paris 1988 pp 36-41 Ambassador to Brussels 1992-6 pp 42-47 (pp 44-46 includes general reflections) 1 Interview with Sir John Gray by Malcolm McBain on 29th October, 2001. McB I see that you were educated at Blundell’s School, went on to Christ’s College, Cambridge, and then went to do National Service from l954 - 56. Some time later, in 1962, you joined the Foreign Service, so would you tell me first of all about your National Service and then, secondly, how you came to join the Foreign Service. JG I actually did National Service immediately after school, l954 - 56. And then I went to University and stayed there for six years, doing research until l962, when I joined the Diplomatic Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine: How Bad, & Good, Was British Rule?
    Palestine: How Bad, & Good, Was British Rule? Avishai Margalit, NYReview of Books, Feb. 7, 2013 Out of Palestine: The Making of Modern Israel by Hadara Lazar Atlas & Co., 290 pp., $25.95 The British rule over Palestine lasted roughly thirty years, from 1917 until 1948. In a country that has three thousand years of recorded history, thirty years is a tiny fraction. If we conceive of three thousand years on a scale of one day, the period of British rule takes barely eight minutes. In comparison, Turkish Ottoman rule over Palestine, which lasted four hundred years, takes an hour and forty minutes. Yet the influence of these thirty years was deep and wide-ranging.1 Under British rule, Palestine became a political unit, not a marginal province of something else. The British made Jerusalem the capital city of Palestine; they introduced the idea of professional civil service, and they encouraged a lively civil society; they built roads and airfields, and provided sound legal institutions and reliable police. The legal frame for British rule was based on a mandate conferred on Britain by the League of Nations. It was meant to be a transitory trusteeship so as to prepare the country to be a “national home for the Jews,” without “impairing the civil and religious rights of the indigenous Arab people.” This contradictory task is at the heart of the story of the British Mandate. It is this mandate of the League of Nations that makes us call the political and military rule of the British over Palestine “The Mandate.” And it’s the Mandate that revived the old term “Palestine” (already used by Herodotus in his writings) to describe the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.
    [Show full text]