Solidarity Beyond the National Boundary: Solidarity of Individuals in the Netherlands with the Papuans Living in West Papua
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Solidarity beyond the national boundary: Solidarity of individuals in the Netherlands with the Papuans living in West Papua TRI MULYASARI, M.SC. Master’s thesis Human Geography: Conflicts, Territories and Identities JUNE 2021 Solidarity beyond the national boundary: Solidarity of individuals in the Netherlands with the Papuans living in West Papua Author: Tri Mulyasari, M.Sc. (s1027059) Supervisors: Dr. B.M.R. van der Velde and A. Fajri, MA words in core text: 32,515 A master’s thesis Human Geography: Conflicts, Territories and Identities Submitted to the Department of Geography, Planning and Environment Nijmegen School of Management Radboud University In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science June 2021 1 Preface Before you lies the master’s thesis “Solidarity beyond the national boundary: Solidarity of individuals in the Netherlands with the Papuans living in West Papua”, a phenomenology study about solidarity conducted among people in the Netherlands who have experienced solidarity with the Papuans. This master’s thesis has been written to contribute to an MSc Human Geography degree from Radboud University. On 8 February 2020, I attended a Papua Solidarity day in Amersfoort, the Netherlands. This year, the chosen topic was violence in West Papua. Actually, I came for my former first topic of my master’s thesis. Before attending the event, I had assumed that this event would be attended mainly by Papuan Dutch, either first-generation or later generation, due to their identity who have Papuan origin and identification with West Papua as an imagined community (Anderson, 2006). However, this assumption was erroneous as there were many non-Papuan- Dutch that came to this event as well. My experience, having the reality versus initial hunch, made me aware that this event showed solidarity with rather than common solidarity among a group of people. More fascinating, it was solidarity with, in the dimension beyond the national boundary. So, a study about people’s solidarity in the Netherlands with the Papuans living in West Papua provides insight into this ‘particular’ solidarity. For this study, I contacted HAPIN as a well-known Papua support foundation in the Netherlands, in which HAPIN then served as a facilitator in reaching respondents. The research process of this master’s thesis has been challenging and enriching for me. At the beginning of the research, I was worried about finding the research participants, thinking it would be difficult to find them. The fact, it was not the case. Once I contacted HAPIN and other organisations and used my network, despite the world pandemic of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), I had several respondents willing to share their story and were enthusiastic about participating in my research. Moreover, they also contacted and recommended other people who might be interested in participating; despite its limitation, this contributed to the approaching of more respondents. During collecting data, I enjoyed conducting the interviews and having conversations with the respondents. I found it very interesting to know different perspectives and obtain new information. The respondents mentioned that they enjoyed the interviews, as some questions made them think thoroughly as they never thought about the topic beforehand. Although I enjoyed the interviews, the process of transcribing the interviews was the slightest task I enjoyed. 2 The analysis and result writing were the most learning processes for me. As a student doing research, I doubted whether I had done the research correctly and adequately and had enough good data, and whether I analysed and presented the data thoroughly. In fighting this doubt, I am very grateful that my thesis supervisors made valuable comments, feedback, and supports and helped me through these processes. I realised that what I could do was just do it, keep writing, try to do better rather than try to do the best. I learned how to make and take the decision with bravery as a researcher. For this, I would like to thank my supervisors for their tremendous guidance and support during the research and writing process. I also wish to thank Wietse Tolsma from HAPIN as my contact person. He answered my email and granted me access to opportunities in approaching respondents. Without him, it would not be easy to convince respondents considering my background as a female Javanese Indonesian researcher researching West Papua. Having conversations with him was also valuable, helped me in preparing data collection and writing the historical relations between the Netherlands and West Papua. Furthermore, I thank all of the respondents for participating in the research, sharing their stories of having solidarity with the Papuans, which made me able to collect data and carry out the analysis. To my beloved husband “Cinta” and family, I would like to thank you for your wonderful support and trust in me that I could do it. You always kept me motivated every time I was down. My thesis writing buddy, Sayaka, I was glad that we supported each other. “Lift up our heads, princess! If not, the crowns fall.” We were a proper sample of solidarity among students. I hope you enjoy the thesis and have a new insight into solidarity with, from the Netherlands to West Papua. Tri Mulyasari, M.Sc. Tilburg, June 11, 2021 3 Abstract The objective is to understand the existence of solidarity of individual actors in the Netherlands with the Papuans. The qualitative research method with phenomenological strategy, collecting data through conducting semi-structured in-depth interviews, and grounded theory as a method of coding and analysing were employed to attain the objective. The research looked at the individual solidarity actors, their foundations and actions of solidarity, and their networks to understand the solidarity. The solidarity emerged because the individual solidarity actors had certain backgrounds and connection with West Papua and the Papuans. The solidarity also related to the foundations for solidarity, in which identity, brotherhood in struggle, place tie, and idealism combined with knowledge about West Papua and the Papuans, and empathy or sympathy, influenced the emergence of solidarity. The individual solidarity actor took actions from having solidarity feeling: giving financial donations, raising awareness, and/or joining demonstrations. The solidarity foundation affected taking certain actions when the foundation entailed issues or causes that required action. Because of the network possessed by individuals, solidarity emerged, strengthened, or solidarity actions could be performed. Keywords: solidarity, individual solidarity actor, foundation for solidarity, solidarity action, network 4 Table of contents Preface ............................................................................................................................ 2 Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 4 Table of contents ............................................................................................................. 5 List of figures .................................................................................................................. 7 List of tables .................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Background of the study ................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Research objective and research questions ...................................................................... 10 1.3 Societal and scientific relevance ...................................................................................... 11 1.4 Chapters outline .............................................................................................................. 13 Chapter 2. Theoretical framework ..................................................................................15 2.1 Solidarity......................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.1 Aspects of solidarity: foundation and action ...................................................................................... 17 2.1.2 Solidarity beyond national boundary: transnational and international solidarity ............................... 19 2.1.3 Solidarity in conflict situation ............................................................................................................ 21 2.2 Actor: individual ............................................................................................................. 22 2.3 Network .......................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 Conceptual framework .................................................................................................... 25 Chapter 3. Methodology..................................................................................................27 3.1 Qualitative research: phenomenological strategy ............................................................ 27 3.2 Data collection ................................................................................................................. 28 3.2.1 Type of data .......................................................................................................................................