DOCSLIB.ORG

Against All Enemies: Inside Americas War on Terror PDF Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Against All Enemies: Inside Americas War on Terror PDF Book AGAINST ALL ENEMIES: INSIDE AMERICAS WAR ON TERROR PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Richard A. Clarke | 352 pages | 03 Oct 2004 | Simon & Schuster Ltd | 9780743268233 | English | London, United Kingdom Against All Enemies: Inside Americas War on Terror PDF Book Clarke pointed out that his book had been finished since the previous year; it was only released at that time because the White House took months to review it for classified information. Instead of doing everything possible to destroy that group the president decided Iraq was more important which played into the hands of bin Laden and other Islamists. The problem is Clarke includes everything he was involved in. This obsession with Iraq was apparent from the start of the Bush administration. Until March he was a career member of the Senior Executive Service, having begun his federal service in in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, as an analyst on nuclear weapons and European security issues. He is also an author. He encountered key officials who gave the impression that they had never heard of al Qaeda; who focused incessantly on Iraq; who even advocated long-discredited conspiracy theories about Saddam's involvement in previous attacks on the United States. Clarke writes that Wolfowitz attempted to connect Saddam Hussein to the first World Trade Center bombing in — a theory based on the writings of Laurie Mylroie that, according to Clarke, has been exhaustively investigated and disproven. For years, bin Laden had been producing propaganda saying that the US wants to invade and occupy an oil-rich middle eastern country, which was essentially validated by the US invasion of Iraq. Table of Contents Rave and Reviews. Clarke felt like Bush made a huge strategic error after this tragedy. Time magazine April 2, p. He knows, better than anyone, the hidden successes and failures of the Clinton years. Later, in a direct response to Cheney's statement, she said "I would not use the word 'out of the loop,' Raves and Reviews. Clarke responded by swearing under oath that he did not want another job in the government and would not accept one. Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz were two of the earliest advocates for confronting Iraq. From the moment the Bush team took office and decided to retain Clarke in his post as the counterterrorism czar, Clarke tried to persuade them to take al Qaeda as seriously as had Bill Clinton. This would eventually give rise to bin Laden and Al Qaeda. Clarke is an American, born in Product Details. That was delivered on September 13 and found no Iraqi role. For the spy novel, see Against All Enemies novel. Bush , charging that he failed to take sufficient action to protect the country in the elevated-threat period before the September 11 attacks and for the invasion of Iraq , which Clarke feels greatly hampered the War on Terrorism. Against All Enemies: Inside Americas War on Terror Writer You may also like: Fiction Staff Picks. But since his plan was not followed, and bin Laden was essentially ignored as the United States and allies invaded Iraq, Al-Qaeda has grown in strength and number, and is now going to be difficult to stop. Clarke felt so frustrated that he asked to be transferred to cyber security. He knows, better than anyone, how President Bush reacted to the attack and what happened behind the scenes in the days that followed. About The Book. I spoke with the President and he wants you all to know Clarke explained that he was a long-time friend of Beers, who had also worked extensively in the government on counterterrorism for Bush and other administrations, and would not give up his friendship simply because his friend had a new job. In it Clarke says that "there was no plan on al Qaeda that was passed from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration," and otherwise puts the Bush administration in a more favorable light. March 24, In his book, Clarke recounts a critical "principals" meeting close to the millennium celebration when Sandy Berger looked hard at Janet [Reno], George Tenet, and me, and said, "We have stopped two sets of attacks planned for the millennium. The New York Times, Now long outdated, this was a useful guide to the politics and conflicting priorities that plagued our foreign affairs and national security community in dealing with the thread of terrorism. By clicking 'Sign me up' I acknowledge that I have read and agree to the privacy policy and terms of use. After ignoring existing plans to attack al Qaeda when he first took office, George Bush made disastrous decisions when he finally did pay attention. Sign up and get a free eBook! Press Secretary Scott McClellan claimed that Clarke timed the publication of his book in order to influence the upcoming election. Neither showed any interest in Al Qaeda. This obsession with Iraq was apparent from the start of the Bush administration. It is in many ways a tougher opponent than the original threat we faced before September 11, and we are not doing what is necessary to make America safe from that threat. The paper was quickly returned by a deputy with a note saying "Please update and resubmit," apparently unshown to the President. Against All Enemies: Inside Americas War on Terror Reviews He criticized U. For years, bin Laden had been producing propaganda saying that the US wants to invade and occupy an oil-rich middle eastern country, which was essentially validated by the US invasion of Iraq. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. By clicking 'Sign me up' I acknowledge that I have read and agree to the privacy policy and terms of use. Neither showed any interest in Al Qaeda. Get a FREE e-book by joining our mailing list today! He points out that had his plan been followed when he first presented it, Al-Qaeda could have been essentially eliminated. The problem is Clarke includes everything he was involved in. It was the president who made the ultimate decision but he ended up siding with the Pentagon and took the same view that Iraq was ultimately more important than Al Qaeda. Morell, Geoffrey R. Namespaces Article Talk. Photo Credit:. This would eventually give rise to bin Laden and Al Qaeda. Condoleezza Rice later contradicted this, claiming the opposite: Clarke was the loop, so any failure in terrorism-preparedness was his. About The Book. That all seems like a sound argument but this is only a part of the book. I think that's somewhat of an unrealistic thing to expect. Clarke argues that he made numerous urgent requests for a meeting about dealing with terrorism, had CIA Director George Tenet include numerous details about Al-Qaeda in daily briefings, found an unprecedented level of terrorist " chatter " before September Your First Name. That future day could happen at any time. Clarke said it was Al Qaeda but told his subordinates to do a review. Press Secretary Scott McClellan claimed that Clarke timed the publication of his book in order to influence the upcoming election. In the Reagan administration, Mr. Tell us what you like and we'll recommend books you'll love. Retrieved July 7, Resources and Downloads. Clarke also says that on September 12, , President Bush asked him to try to find evidence that Saddam Hussein was connected to the terrorist attacks. Thank you for signing up, fellow book lover! Clarke worked for four administrations dealing with terrorism under Clinton and the second Bush. About The Author. But perhaps most damagingly, Clarke claims that the administration has done "a terrible job" fighting terrorism, even since September Clark's main point is that U. Most disturbing of all are Clarke's revelations about the Bush administration's lack of interest in al Qaeda prior to September From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Clarke believed the White House was completely ignorant of the negative impact Iraq had in this struggle while claiming that it was the most important step in the war on terror. Fox News Channel released a transcript from an August briefing that Clarke gave to reporters while he was still working for the White House, as background meaning not for attribution. As a result, says Clarke, it's not surprising that Al-Qaeda and its offshoots are having much greater success recruiting new members. This obsession with Iraq was apparent from the start of the Bush administration. Table of Contents Rave and Reviews. In it Clarke says that "there was no plan on al Qaeda that was passed from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration," and otherwise puts the Bush administration in a more favorable light. Clarke , criticizing past and present presidential administrations for the way they handled the War on Terrorism. Clarke responded by swearing under oath that he did not want another job in the government and would not accept one. A new al Qaeda has emerged and is growing stronger, in part because of our own actions and inactions. The book's title comes from the oath of office taken by all U. According to Freeh, the passage was a "nice tale, but I was never at such a meeting, and Sandy Berger never would have spoken like that in front of the attorney general. Against All Enemies: Inside Americas War on Terror Read Online A new al Qaeda has emerged and is growing stronger, in part because of our own actions and inactions. For years, bin Laden had been producing propaganda saying that the US wants to invade and occupy an oil-rich middle eastern country, which was essentially validated by the US invasion of Iraq.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003
    THE REGIME CHANGE CONSENSUS: IRAQ IN AMERICAN POLITICS, 1990-2003 Joseph Stieb A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Wayne Lee Michael Morgan Benjamin Waterhouse Daniel Bolger Hal Brands ©2019 Joseph David Stieb ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joseph David Stieb: The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003 (Under the direction of Wayne Lee) This study examines the containment policy that the United States and its allies imposed on Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War and argues for a new understanding of why the United States invaded Iraq in 2003. At the core of this story is a political puzzle: Why did a largely successful policy that mostly stripped Iraq of its unconventional weapons lose support in American politics to the point that the policy itself became less effective? I argue that, within intellectual and policymaking circles, a claim steadily emerged that the only solution to the Iraqi threat was regime change and democratization. While this “regime change consensus” was not part of the original containment policy, a cohort of intellectuals and policymakers assembled political support for the idea that Saddam’s personality and the totalitarian nature of the Baathist regime made Iraq uniquely immune to “management” strategies like containment. The entrenchment of this consensus before 9/11 helps explain why so many politicians, policymakers, and intellectuals rejected containment after 9/11 and embraced regime change and invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Media, Law, and National Resolve in the War on Terror
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 33 Number 1 Winter - 2004 Sutton Colloquium Article 10 April 2020 The Role of the Media, Law, and National Resolve in the War on Terror Robert Hardaway Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Robert Hardaway, The Role of the Media, Law, and National Resolve in the War on Terror, 33 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 104 (2004). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA, LAW, AND NATIONAL RESOLVE IN THE WAR ON TERROR ROBERT HARDAWAY* I. INTRODUCTION In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the govern- ment of the United States took unprecedented steps to protect American lives and property.' Measures imposed included tightened security at nuclear power plants,2 airports,3 and numerous other government and private installations around the United States.4 Debate over an appropriate U.S. response centered on whether there was proof of a foreign state's complicity in the attacks. On September 15, 2001, a New York Times/CBS News poll revealed that eighty-five percent of Americans would Professor of Law, University of Denver Sturm College of Law. 1. See, e.g., Michael R. Gordon, After the Attacks: An Assessment, U.S. Force vs, Terrorists: From Reactive to Active, N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Options for U.S
    THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE POLICY FOCUS IRAQ: OPTIONS FOR U.S. POLICY LAURIE MYLROIE RESEARCH MEMORANDUM NUMBER TWENTY-ONE MAY 1993 Cover and title page illustrations from windows of the tom Bi-AmnW Mosque. 990-1013 THE AUTHOR Laurie Mylroie is Arab Affairs Fellow at The Washington Institute. She has previously taught in the Department of Government at Harvard University and at the U.S. Naval War College. Among Dr. Mylroie's many published works on Iraq are Saddam Hussein and the Crisis in the Gulf (with Judith Miller), and The Future of Iraq (Washington Institute Policy Paper Number 24). The views expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and should not necessarily be construed as representing those of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Clinton administration inherited a flawed Iraq policy from the Bush administration, but, in formulating a new policy, it has failed to accurately define those flaws. Its emphasis on "depersonalizing" the conflict with Iraq by shifting the focus from Saddam Hussein to Baghdad's compliance with relevant UN resolutions may mean that the Clinton administration will eventually, if reluctantly, come to terms with Saddam's dogged hold on power and accept a diluted form of Iraqi compliance with the resolutions. Although that may be far from the administration's intent, the present formulation of U.S. policy may weaken the coalition and lead to that result nonetheless. The Clinton administration has stated that it will enforce all UN resolutions, including Resolution 687, which, inter alia, provides for stripping Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, and Resolution 688, which demands that Baghdad cease to repress its population.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF Counterproliferation Center CPC Outreach Journal #103
    #103 18 Sep 2001 USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Air University Air War College Maxwell AFB, Alabama Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with nuclear, biological and chemical threats and attacks. It’s our hope this information resource will help enhance your counterproliferation issue awareness. Established here at the Air War College in 1998, the USAF/CPC provides education and research to present and future leaders of the Air Force, as well as to members of other branches of the armed services and Department of Defense. Our purpose is to help those agencies better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction. Please feel free to visit our web site at www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-cps.htm for in-depth information and specific points of contact. Please direct any questions or comments on CPC Outreach Journal to Lt. Col. Michael W. Ritz, CPC Intelligence/Public Affairs or JoAnn Eddy, CPC Outreach Editor, at (334) 953- 7538 or DSN 493-7538. The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved Editor's Note: Dear Readers, still trying to get through all the recent news stories.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Trade Center Bombers ( 1993) John V
    Chapter 11 The World Trade Center Bombers ( 1993) John V. Parachini The February 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City marked the beginning of an ugly new phase of terrorism involving the indiscriminate killing of civilians. ’ Like the sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway in March 1995 and the bombing of the Alfred E. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in April 4995, the World Trade Center bomb- ing was motivated by the desire to kill as many people as possible. The target of the bomb plot was the World Trade Center (WTC) complex, a sixteen-acre site in lower Manhattan. Although mostly known for the Twin Towers, which are 110 stories tall and 1,550 feet high, the complex consists of seven buildings, including the Vista Hotel. Although the explosion killed six people and injured more than 1,000, the conse- quences could have been far worse: on any given day approximately 20,000 people work in the various businesses of the WTC complex and another 80,000 people either visit the complex or travel through it.2 On May 24,1994, during the sentencing of four of the convicted WTC bombers, Judge Kevin T. Duffy asserted that the perpetrators had incor- porated sodium cyanide into the bomb with the intent to generate deadly hydrogen cyanide gas that would kill everyone in one of the towers. The Judge stated: 1. Jim Dwyer, David Kocieniewski, Deidre Murphy, and Peg Tyre, Two Seconds Under the World: Terror Comes fo America-Ike Conspiracy Behind the World Trade Center Bombing (New York: Crown Publishers, 1994), p.
    [Show full text]
  • How Little We Know
    How Little WeBY LAURIE Know MYLROIE 22 THE AMERICAN SPECTATOR OCTOBER 2006 If al Qaeda is supposed to represent the “new” terrorism, it remains puzzling why U.S. intelligence since the Clinton era has not connected the dots and confronted their implications. L QAEDA REPRESENTS the most serious terrorist later that he had meant to kill 250,000 people. It is cru- threat we face, but how much do we under- cial to recognize that al Qaeda was not involved in this stand about this elusive enemy? Few Ameri- plot. Despite serious efforts to uncover evidence lead- cans even knew of al Qaeda’s existence during ing to Osama bin Laden, he has never been indicted for its first decade. We now know (from docu- this attack. (The United States did not indict bin Laden ments discovered since 9/11) that al Qaeda was until June of 1998, when he was charged with conspir- A founded in August 1988, by Osama bin Laden acy in another bombing plot that never materialized.) with 14 associates, as a relatively small and highly Moreover, the military charges issued against detain- secretive organization. There is virtually no public ees at Guantanamo Bay omit the Trade Center bomb- mention of it for a full ten years—a Lexis-Nexis search ing in the official account of al Qaeda’s conspiracy for al Qaeda, using all possible spellings, produces against the United States. only five articles—until the bombing of two U.S. em- Indeed, it would have been a truly massive failure bassies in Africa on August 7, 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Sentiment
    Analytical Update: Ukrainian Sentiment By Laurie Ann Mylroie, Ph.D. RIWI Editorial Fellow September 26, 2014 In the two weeks since The RIWI Corporation (RIWI) published its September 10 Ukraine study, Russia has continued its slow-paced assault on Ukraine. Its actions and rhetoric never quite rise (at least in the mainstream media) to the level of mobilizing collective Western outrage, but, nonetheless, constitute a steady aggression—ongoing for seven months, since Special Operations Forces seized Crimea in March. RIWI’s September Ukrainian sentiment data suggests that the country as a whole opposes the Russian aggression, while sentiment in the East is fluid, with a significant percentage of the population undecided about the best course for the future. RIWI’s Ukraine data capture (September 4-10) followed a successful Ukrainian counter- offensive against rebels in the east, which was reversed in mid-August, when Russian forces entered the fray. Within two weeks, rebels stood on the outskirts of the port city of Mariupol, raising fears that they intended not only to capture the city, but even to establish a land bridge to Crimea. German Chancellor Angela Merkel asserted that the fighting was not an internal Ukrainian affair but a “conflict between Ukraine and Russia.” However, Western reaction was limited. Western powers affirmed their intent to stop Russian aggression beyond Ukraine at a NATO summit (September 4-5), but showed themselves prepared to do little for Ukraine itself, beyond imposing new sanctions on Russia. The options of Ukraine’s government were, thus, limited when it met in Belarus with the rebels and Russia under the auspices of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
    [Show full text]
  • DEMOCRACY in DEFINING the CHALLENGE
    DEMOCRACY in DEFINING THE CHALLENGE Contributors: Joshua Muravchik Laurie Mylroie Graham Fuller Martin Kramer Mohammed Abdelbeki Hermassi Edited by Yehudah Mirsky and Matt Ahrens A WASHINGTON INSTITUTE MONOGRAPH Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Democracy in the Middle East: defining the challenge/ edited by Yehudah Mirsky and Matt Ahrens ; contributors, Josh Muravchik ... [et al.]. p. cm. "A Washington Institute Monograph/' ISBN 0-944029-53-1 1. Democracy—Middle East. 2. Middle East— Politics and government—1979- 3. United States— Foreign Relations—Middle East. 4. Middle East— Foreign Relations—United States. I. Mirsky, Yehudah. II. Ahrens, Matt. III. Muravchik, Joshua. IV. Washington Institute for Near East Policy. JQ1758.A91D46 1993 321.8/0956--dc20 93-28820 C1P Copyright © 1993 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street, N.W., Suite 1050 Washington, D.C. 20036 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 93-28820 ISBN 0-944029-53-1 Cover Design by Jill Indyk Cover photograph © Gregoire/EEA/SABA October 1992 Borj-Mlain, Algeria A FIS RALLY CONTENTS Contributors v Preface vii Exporting Democracy to the Arab World Joshua Muravchik 1 Promoting Democracy as a Principle of U.S. Middle East Policy Laurie Mylroie 11 A Phased Introduction of Islamists Graham Fuller 21 Where Islam and Democracy Part Ways Martin Kramer 31 Islam, Democracy and the Challenge of Political Change Mohammed Abdelbeki Hermassi 41 SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS 53 CONTRIBUTORS Graham Fuller, a senior political scientist at the RAND Corporation, served as the National Intelligence Officer for the Near East and South Asia responsible for long-range intelligence forecasting from 1982 to 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Threat Inºation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas
    Threat Inºation and the Marketplace of Ideas Threat Inºation and Chaim Kaufmann the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas The Selling of the Iraq War Mature democracies such as the United States are generally believed to be better at making foreign policy than other regime types. Especially, the strong civic institutions and ro- bust marketplaces of ideas in mature democracies are thought to substantially protect them from severe threat inºation and “myths of empire” that could promote excessively risky foreign policy adventures and wars. The market- place of ideas helps to weed out unfounded, mendacious, or self-serving for- eign policy arguments because their proponents cannot avoid wide-ranging debate in which their reasoning and evidence are subject to public scrutiny.1 The marketplace of ideas, however, failed to fulªll this function in the 2002–03 U.S. foreign policy debate over going to war with Iraq. By now there is broad agreement among U.S. foreign policy experts, as well as much of the American public and the international community, that the threat assessments that President George W. Bush and his administration used to justify the war against Iraq were greatly exaggerated, and on some dimensions wholly baseless. Postwar revelations have made clear that President Bush and top ofªcials of his administration were determined from early 2001 to bring about regime change in Iraq.2 It was not until the summer of 2002, however, that they began Chaim Kaufmann is Associate Professor of International Relations at Lehigh University. For helpful comments, the author is indebted to Robert Art, Karen Ballentine, Stephen Biddle, Mia Bloom, Jane Kellett Cramer, Michael Desch, Peter Feaver, Christopher Herrick, Seymour Hersh, Robert Jervis, Jack Levy, David MacMichael, John Mearsheimer, Ivan Oelrich, Robert Pape, Ken- neth Pollack, Edward Rhodes, Gideon Rose, John Schuessler, Jack Snyder, Stephen Van Evera, par- ticipants in the University of Chicago Program on International Security Policy, and to International Security’s anonymous reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iraq War Reader
    THE IRAQ WAR READER History, Documents, Opinions SUB Gflttingen 215 929 683 • IHIII ••• • mii IIHI mil in 2003 A 12035 Edited by Micah L. Sifry and Christopher Cerf A TOUCHSTONE BOOK Published by Simon & Schuster NEW YORK LONDON TORONTO SYDNEY SINGAPORE Contents Introduction and Acknowledgments be PART ONE SINS OF THE FATHERS ONE ROOTS OF CONFLICT: 1915-1989 3 Imperial Legacy Phillip Knightley 5 The Rise of Saddam Hussein Judith Miller and Laurie Mylroie 18 What Washington Gave Saddam for Christmas Murray Waas 30 The Men Who Helped the Man Who Gassed His Own People Joost R. Hiltermann 41 TWO THE FIRST GULF WAR 45 Realpolitik in the Gulf: A Game Gone Tilt Christopher Hitchens 47 U.S. Senators Chat with Saddam 58 The Glaspie Transcript: Saddam Meets the U.S. Ambassador 6 J The Experts Speak on the Coming Gulf War edited by Christopher Cerf and Victor Navasky 72 How Saddam Misread the United States Kenneth Pollack 76 PART TWO AFTERMATHS OF THE GULF WAR THREE SADDAM SURVIVES 89 "We Have Saddam Hussein Still Here" Andrew Cockburn and Patrick Cockburn 91 Why We Didn't Go to Baghdad George Bush and Brent Scowcroft 101 Why the Uprisings Failed FalehA.Jabar 103 xiv • Contents How Saddam Held On to Power Kanan Makiya 114 FOUR CASUALTIES OF WAR 127 What Bodies? Patrick]. Sloyan 129 Remember Nayirah, Witness for Kuwait? John R. MacArthur 13 5 "Thank God for the Patriot Missile!" edited by Christopher Cerf and Victor Navasky 138 Did Iraq Try to Assassinate ex-President Bush in 1993? A Case Not Closed Seymour M.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IRAQ WAR -- PART I: the U.S
    1 THE IRAQ WAR -- PART I: The U.S. Prepares for Conflict, 2001 National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 326 Timeline By Joyce Battle 1985 – Academic Albert Wohlstetter supporter, neoconservative Richard Perle, introduces Iraqi expatriate Ahmad Chalabi reportedly raises most of the group’s to Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle, funding from defense contractors and a neoconservatives later influential in the right-wing foundation. Bandar attracts George W. Bush administration. 1 support from several Jewish organizations by telling them that if Saddam Hussein 1989 -- Petra Bank of Amman, founded were eliminated other governments in the by Ahmad Chalabi and influential through region would deal with the Arab-Israeli its strategic lending to prominent conflict on more “pragmatic terms."5 Jordanians, including the king of Jordan’s brother, is seized by the government for October 10, 1990 -- An informal alleged irregularities. Chalabi flees the association called the Congressional country in the trunk of a car. Two years Human Rights Caucus holds a hearing on later he is convicted in absentia for reported Iraqi atrocities. The association embezzlement and fraud and sentenced to is chaired by Tom Lantos (D-CA) and John 22 years in prison.2 Porter (R-IL) who also head the Congressional Human Rights Foundation, 1990 – Prominent neoconservative which is headquartered in free office space academic Bernard Lewis meets Ahmad at Hill & Knowlton's Washington, D.C. Chalabi and becomes one of his leading office. At the hearing a 15-year-old advocates.3 Kuwaiti girl says she witnessed Iraqi soldiers leaving babies on the floor to die August 2, 1990 -- Iraq invades Kuwait, in order to steal incubators; the story is accusing it of conspiring with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muslim World After 9/11 / Angel M
    CHILD POLICY This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as CIVIL JUSTICE a public service of the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE 6 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY effective solutions that address the challenges facing SUBSTANCE ABUSE the public and private sectors around the world. TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. ѮF.VTMJN8PSME "/(&-.3"#"4" ] $)&3:-#&/"3% ] 1&5&3$)"-, $$)3*45*/&'"*3 ] 5)&0%03&,"3"4*, 30--*&-"- ] *"/-&44&3 ] %"7*%5)"-&3 0REPAREDFORTHE5NITED3TATES!IR&ORCE !PPROVEDFORPUBLICRELEASEDISTRIBUTIONUNLIMITED The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF.
    [Show full text]