Mike Prendergast Colonel, U.S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Record Version Statement by Major General Donna
RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY MAJOR GENERAL DONNA MARTIN THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL AND COMMANDING GENERAL OF THE U.S. ARMY CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON MILITARY PERSONNEL COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FIRST SESSION, 117TH CONGRESS ON MILITARY CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE ORGANIZATION REFORM RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE FORT HOOD INDEPENDENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MARCH 16, 2021 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES Chairwoman Speier, Ranking Member Banks, and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. I am here to discuss the United States Army Criminal Investigation Command, its mission, organizational structure, ongoing reform initiatives, and our efforts to address the findings and recommendations of the Fort Hood Independent Review Committee. I serve the United States Army in two capacities: as the Provost Marshal General of the Army and as the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command. As the Provost Marshal General, I am the principal military advisor to the Secretary of the Army and Chief of Staff of the Army on all Army policing and law enforcement matters. This includes law enforcement policy, criminal investigations, criminal intelligence, physical security, Army corrections and confinement, antiterrorism matters, and detention operations, as well as forensics and biometrics. As the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, I am responsible for overseeing the U.S. Army’s primary criminal investigative organization. The Criminal Investigation Command is responsible for conducting felony- level criminal investigations in which the Army is, or may be, a party of interest. -
MILITARY POLICE, an Official U.S
USAMPS / MANSCEN This medium is approved for the official dissemination 573-XXX-XXXX / DSN 676-XXXX of material designed to keep individuals within the Army COMMANDANT knowledgeable of current and emerging developments within BG Stephen J. Curry .................................................... 563-8019 their areas of expertise for the purpose of enhancing their <[email protected]> professional development. ACTING ASSISTANT COMMANDANT By Order of the Secretary of the Army: COL Charles E. Bruce .................................................. 563-8017 PETER J. SCHOOMAKER <[email protected]> General, United States Army COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR Chief of Staff CSM James F. Barrett .................................................. 563-8018 Official: <[email protected]> DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMANDANT—USAR COL Charles E. Bruce .................................................. 563-8082 JOEL B. HUDSON <[email protected]> Administrative Assistant to the DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMANDANT—ARNG Secretary of the Army LTC Starrleen J. Heinen .................................. 596-0131, 38103 02313130330807 <[email protected]> DIRECTOR of TRAINING DEVELOPMENT MILITARY POLICE, an official U.S. Army professional COL Edward J. Sannwaldt, Jr........................................ 563-4111 bulletin for the Military Police Corps Regiment, contains infor- <[email protected]> mation about military police functions in maneuver and DIRECTORATE of COMBAT DEVELOPMENTS mobility operations, area security operations, internment/ MP DIVISION CHIEF -
Military Police Transformation
USAMPS/MANSCEN This medium is approved for the official dissemination 573-XXX-XXXX/DSN 676-XXXX of material designed to keep individuals within the Army knowledgeable of current and emerging developments within COMMANDANT their areas of expertise for the purpose of enhancing their BG Rodney L. Johnson ................................................. 563-8019 professional development. <[email protected]> By Order of the Secretary of the Army: ASSISTANT COMMANDANT PETER J. SCHOOMAKER COL Colleen L. McGuire ............................................. 563-8017 <[email protected]> General, United States Army Chief of Staff COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR CSM James F. Barrett .................................................. 563-8018 Official: <[email protected]> DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMANDANT—USAR COL Charles E. Bruce .................................................. 563-8082 SANDRA R. RILEY <[email protected]> Administrative Assistant to the DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMANDANT—ARNG Secretary of the Army MAJ Bruce L. Barker..................................................... 563-8103 02313130503206 <[email protected]> MILITARY POLICE, an official US Army professional QUALITY ASSURANCE ELEMENT Ms. Sandra Pardue...............................................563-5892 bulletin for the Military Police Corps Regiment, contains infor- <[email protected]> mation about military police functions in maneuver and mobility operations, area security operations, internment/ resettlement operations, law and order operations, -
89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94Th Congress an Act Uct
89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94th Congress An Act Uct. /, 1975^ rpQ authorize certain construction at military installations, and for other purposes. [S. 1247] Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Military United States of America in Congress assenibled^ construction and guard and reserve TITLE I—ARMY forces facilities authorization acts, 1976. SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop mili Military tary installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, Construction rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, Authorization including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, Act, 1976. and equipment for the following acquisition and construction: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Defense Support Activity (Fargo Building), Boston, Massachu setts, $8,000,000. Fort Bragg, North Carolina. $13,214,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $13,680,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $10,732,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $46,281,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $870,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $31,861,000. Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, $2,892,000. Fort Ord, California, $32,209,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $54,361,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $1,685,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $14,879,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Airfield, Georgia, $39,480,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort Benning, Georgia, $44,212,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia, $633,000. Fort Gordon, Georgia, $6,945,000. Fort Jackson, South Carolina, $14,546,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky, $42,898,000. Fort Lee, Virginia, $719,000. Fort McClellan, Alabama, $41,090,000. -
Military Policeman
MHI C3 Copy 2 _I uEtAnIlmt.l OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL THE MILITARY POLICEMAN HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF tHE ARMY JULY 1959 *FM 19-5 FIELD MANUAL HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 19-5 J WASHINGTON 25, D. C., 7 July 1959 THE MILITARY POLICEMAN Paragraphs Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY Section I. Introduction ----------- 1, 2 3 II. History …-_-______ 3, 4 4 CHAPTER 2. THE MILITARY POLICE CORPS AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES Section 1. Personnel -__-___-_- 5-8 9 II. Standards and appearance 9-11 11 III. Uniform and equipment- 12,13 16 IV. Organizations and facili- ties -------- -- - _ 14,15 18 V. Other law enforcement agencies ------------- 16-19 22 CHAPTER 3. JURISDICTION AND AUTHORITY Section I. Jurisdiction _---__-___._ 20-24 28 II. Authority -------------- 25-30 31 CHAPTER 4. DUTIES OF THE MILI- TARY POLICEMAN Section I. Compliance .-----------31, 32 42 II. Military police public rela- tions and services ----- 33, 34 44 III. Military police patrols and fixed posts --- _-______ 35-41 45 IV. Crime prevention .------42-45 52 *This manual supersedes FM 19-5, 14 September 1950, including C 1, 22 April 1952, and C 2, 22 August 1952.. TAGO 6569C 1 Paragraphs Page Section V. Apprehension, restraint, and detention _____.-- 46-61 55 VI. Military police notebook and reports -. -_______62-65 86 VII. Assisting military police criminal investigators _ 66, 67 90 VIII. Investigating incidents __ 68-73 92 IX. Witness in court -.__. ...74-77 96 X. Military police traffic con- trol ___-__.___.__.---- 78-80 97 XI. -
Mountain Longleaf National Wildlife Refuge Habitat Management Plan
Mountain Longleaf National Wildlife Refuge ---.. Habitat Management Plan f 6/ji( ~ (1) Refuge Manager 421/z-rDate (2) Refuge£U~~Supervisor II()rfosDa e Mountain LongleafNWR Area 2 .~ C /t;; ~/~7dO.J A. z /7!~/iJ5 (3) ResourceManagement Date (41 a3ef - Divisionof Refuges ~ Southeast Region FJ.SR&~ SERVICE ~ -w . November 2005 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 1.1 Planning Process-----------------------------------------------------------------------1 1.2 Mountain Longleaf National Wildlife Refuge-------------------------------------2 1.3 Refuge Vision--------------------------------------------------------------------------2 1.4 Longleaf Pine Restoration------------------------------------------------------------3 1.5 Habitat Management Plan------------------------------------------------------------5 2.0 Environmental Setting and Background-------------------------------------------------6 2.1 Location---------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 2.2 Management Units---------------------------------------------------------------------6 2.3 Physical Features-----------------------------------------------------------------------6 2.3.1 Geology ------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 2.3.2 Topography ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 2.3.3 Hydrology ---------------------------------------------------------------------------7 2.3.4 Soils -
97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98Th Congress an Act
PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1984, and for Oct. 11, 1983 other purposes. [H.R. 2972] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That this Act may Military be cited as the "Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984'\ Au'thorizSn Act, 1984. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $31,100,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $15,300,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $17,760,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $3,000,000. Fort Douglas, Utah, $910,000. Fort Drum, New York, $1,500,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $76,050,000. Fort Hunter Liggett, California, $1,000,000. Fort Irwin, California, $34,850,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $35,310,000. Fort Meade, Maryland, $5,150,000. Fort Ord, California, $6,150,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $16,180,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $940,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $76,600,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia, $29,720,000. Presidio of Monterey, California, $1,300,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $31,900,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, $1,500,000. Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, $5,900,000. -
Chemical Corps Regimental Association Newsletter
Chemical Corps Regimental Association April 2012 Newsletter 2012 CBRN JIIM-IA Special Interest Articles: Register at the Link: 2012 JIIM-IA Conference & Exhibition Information theme for the conference Register now for Mark your calendars! The Strong Presence by the 2012 CBRN second CBRN Joint is “The CBRN JPEO-CBD: The Joint JIIM-IA Interagency Profession—2020 and Program Executive Conference at Intergovernmental & Multi Beyond.” This theme Officer, Joint Project Fort Leonard - National-Industry & focuses on the CBRN Managers, and Subject Wood Academia (JIIM-IA) capabilities, units, Matter Experts will be on Conference and Exhibition Soldiers, and technology CSM Gabriel required to enable the hand to share insight into will be held at Fort the future of CBRN Arnold becomes Leonard Wood 26-28 future force as described th in the current or defense as well as the 12 RCSM June 2012. developing Army updates on fielded CBRN See our Planning for this year's Capstone and Army equipment, products, and Scholarship conference is well Operating Concept. We capabilities via 10 booth Winners page 2 underway, and we will engage our strategic spaces ---both indoor and anticipate an even better thinkers of today and outdoor! There will also event than last year. The be a strong Presence by discuss preparations for th Individual our next set of challenges. 20 Support Command Highlights: (CBRNE). CSM Gabe Arnold becomes the New Regimental CSM CBRN Ladies Only Command Sergeant Major Sergeant, Delta Network 2 Gabriel Arnold becomes Company, 82d Chemical the 12th Regimental Battalion, Fort McClellan, Loss of Commandant’s Command Sergeant Major AL; Battalion CBRN NCO, Mother 3 for the U.S. -
Records of Military Agencies Relating to African Americans from the Post-World War I Period to the Korean War
Records of Military Agencies Relating to African Americans from the Post-World War I Period to the Korean War R EFERENCE I NFORMATION P APER 105 N ATIONAL A RCHIVES AND R ECORDS A DMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC R EVISED 2006 Records of Military Agencies Relating to African Americans from the Post-World War I Period to the Korean War COMPILED BY LISHA B. PENN R EFERENCE I NFORMATION PAPER 105 NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC Revised 2006 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records of military agencies relating to African Americans from the post World War I period to the Korean War/compiled by Lisha B. Penn.—Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration, revised 2006. 166 p.; 28 cm.—(Reference information paper 105) Includes index. 1. United States—Armed Forces—Afro-Americans—History—20th century— Sources. 2. Afro-American soldiers—History—20th century—Sources. 3. Afro-American sailors—History— 20th century—Sources. I. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. II. Title III. Series 42303670 COVER: “On parade, the 41st Engineers at Ft. Bragg, NC, in color guard ceremony.” Contents Preface . 1 Part I I NTRODUCTION Scope of the Paper . 3 Overview of Pertinent Records . 4 Principles of Arrangement . 5 How to Use This Paper . 5 Acknowledgments . 7 Part II A IR F ORCE C LUSTER RG 18 Records of the Army Air Forces . 8 RG 340 Records of the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force. 12 RG 341 Records of Headquarters United States Air Force (Air Staff) . 15 Part III O LD A RMY C LUSTER RG 77 Records of the Office of the Chief of Engineers . -
166 Public Law 86-500-.June 8, 1960 [74 Stat
166 PUBLIC LAW 86-500-.JUNE 8, 1960 [74 STAT. Public Law 86-500 June 8. 1960 AN ACT [H» R. 10777] To authorize certain construction at military installation!^, and for other pnriwses. He it enacted hy the Hemite and House of Representatives of the 8tfiction^'Acf°^ I'raited States of America in Congress assemoJed, I960. TITLE I ''^^^* SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con- \'erting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equip ment, for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES I'ECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Training facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $6,221,000. Benicia Arsenal, California: Utilities, $337,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Utilities and ground improvements, $353,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Research, development, and test facilities, $850,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, Colorado: Operational facilities, $369,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Community facilities and utilities, $1,000,000. Umatilla Ordnance Depot, Oregon: Utilities and ground improve ments, $319,000. Watertow^n Arsenal, Massachusetts: Research, development, and test facilities, $1,849,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Operational facilities and utilities, $1,2'33,000. (Quartermaster Corps) Fort Lee, Virginia: Administrative facilities and utilities, $577,000. Atlanta General Depot, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, $365,000. New Cumberland General Depot, Pennsylvania: Operational facili ties, $89,000. Richmond Quartermaster Depot, Virginia: Administrative facili ties, $478,000. Sharpe General Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $218,000. (Chemical Corps) Army Chemical Center, Maryland: Operational facilities and com munity facilities, $843,000. -
Army in Europe Regulation 550-175, 15 July 2011
Headquarters Army in Europe United States Army Europe United States Army Installation Management Command Regulation 550-175* Europe Region Heidelberg, Germany Headquarters CNE-CNA-C6F U.S. Naval Forces Europe/U.S. Naval Forces Africa/ U.S. Sixth Fleet Instruction 5840.1F* Naples, Italy Headquarters USAFE United States Air Forces in Europe Ramstein, Germany Instruction 51-702* 15 July 2011 Foreign Countries and Nationals U.S. Forces Customs Controls in Germany *This publication supersedes AE Regulation 550-175/USNAVEUR Instruction 5840.1E/USAFE Instruction 51-702, 24 January 2003. For the Commander: Authenticated: JAMES C. BOOZER, SR. K. J. NORTON MARK A. WELSH Major General, GS Rear Admiral, USN General, USAF Chief of Staff Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, Commander Resources, and Plans DWAYNE J. VIERGUTZ G. E. MODARAI JEFFREY A. ROCKWELL Chief, Army in Europe Captain, JAGC, USN Colonel, USAF Document Management Force Judge Advocate Staff Judge Advocate Summary. This publication establishes customs policy and procedures for the U.S. Forces, their military personnel, the civilian component, and their dependents stationed in Germany. It also prescribes responsibilities of the USAREUR Provost Marshal (PM) as the CG USAREUR Customs Executive Agent and Customs Mission Operator. Additionally, this publication prescribes responsibilities of United States Forces Customs-Europe (USFC-E). Summary of Change. This revision— ● Transfers customs-control responsibility from the 560th Military Police Company to USFC-E. ● Transfers Customs Mission Operator’s responsibilities from the Commander, 560th Military Police Company, to the USAREUR PM. 1 AE Reg 550-175/CNE-CNA-C6F Inst 5840.1F/USAFE Inst 51-702 ● 15 Jul 11 ● Removes the provision that authorized personnel can lend a privately owned vehicle only to visitors who are U.S. -
U.S. Marshal at Gettysburg
The U.S. Marshal at Gettysburg Charles Teague A typical American envisioning U.S. Marshals may imagine them bringing peace and order to the frontier with the fabled Wyatt Earp or the Hollywood hero, Matt Dillon. But the historic accounts of marshals during the American Civil War are no less intriguing and are more significant. That is particularly so regarding the provost marshal of the Army of the Potomac, Marsena Patrick, who served at Gettysburg during and immediately after the battle. Each of the two words in his title has a storied past still hinted at in twenty-first-century America. Marshal is derived from the Teutonic, meaning “master of the horse,” and is commonly used yet today to describe the one responsible for a parade. Provost comes from the Latin conveying the idea of “one who is placed above others.” Many colleges today have a provost, the chief academic officer who stands second only to the president. A provost marshal general serves as a high-ranking officer who carries the authority of his commander in assuring order in the army. In recent years, the U.S. Army has again brought the terminology to prominence, replacing the term provost marshal with military police, or MP’s.1 One of the earliest documents prescribing the duties of the provost marshal is a 1629 edict from King Charles of England: The Provost must have a horse allowed him and some soldiers to attend him and all the rest commanded to obey and assist, or else the Service will suffer: for he is but one man and must correct many and therefore cannot be beloved.