DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Justice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Justice Vol. 76 Monday, No. 238 December 12, 2011 Part II Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration 21 CFR Part 1308 Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Carisoprodol Into Schedule IV; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:56 Dec 09, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\12DER2.SGM 12DER2 jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES2 77330 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 238 / Monday, December 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (1) [The drug’s] actual or relative that the then-available data did not potential for abuse. support controlling carisoprodol. Id. Drug Enforcement Administration (2) Scientific evidence of its Thereafter, at the direction of the pharmacological effect, if known. National Institute on Drug Abuse 21 CFR Part 1308 (3) The state of current scientific (NIDA) and the College of Problems of knowledge regarding the drug or other Drug Dependence (CPDD), additional [Docket No. DEA–333] substance. pharmacological studies of (4) Its history and current pattern of carisoprodol’s abuse liability were Schedules of Controlled Substances: abuse. conducted. In the meantime, DEA Placement of Carisoprodol Into (5) The scope, duration, and gathered additional new data on actual Schedule IV significance of abuse. abuse and law enforcement encounters (6) What, if any, risk there is to the involving the drug, as well as other AGENCY: Drug Enforcement information, which it sent to HHS on Administration, Department of Justice. public health. (7) Its psychic or physiological November 14, 2005. FDA also acquired ACTION: Final rule. dependence liability. new data from the Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), the National Survey SUMMARY: With the issuance of this final (8) Whether the substance is an rule, the Administrator of the Drug immediate precursor of a substance on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), Enforcement Administration (DEA) already controlled under this Florida Medical Examiners Commission places the substance carisoprodol, subchapter. reports, FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting including its salts, isomers, and salts of 21 U.S.C. 811(c). System, as well as other information isomers, whenever the existence of such However, ‘‘before initiating from a variety of sources. On October 6, 2009, HHS concluded salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is proceedings * * * to control a drug its review of the evidence pertaining to possible, into Schedule IV of the * * * and after gathering the necessary the eight factors set forth in 21 U.S.C. Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This data,’’ the Attorney General is required 811 and recommended that carisoprodol action is pursuant to the CSA which to ‘‘request from the Secretary a be placed in schedule IV. GX 6, at 1. requires that such actions be made on scientific and medical evaluation, and Thereafter, on November 17, 2009, DEA the record after opportunity for a his recommendations, as to whether issued a Notice of Proposed hearing. The decision of the such drug * * * should be controlled.’’ Rulemaking, which proposed placing Administrator is reprinted in its entirety Id. 811(b). The statute further provides carisoprodol in schedule IV. ALJ Ex., at below. that ‘‘[i]n making such evaluation and 1 (74 FR 59108). Therein, DEA invited recommendations, the Secretary shall DATES: Effective Date: January 11, 2012. all persons to submit written comments consider the Factors listed in paragraphs FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: or objections to the proposed rule; DEA (2), (3), (6), (7), and (8) of subsection (c) Rhea D. Moore, Drug Enforcement also notified ‘‘interested persons’’ of * * * and any scientific or medical Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive, their right to request a hearing. Id. at 2 considerations involved in paragraphs Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone (citing 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557). (202) 307–5268. (1), (4), and (5) of such subsection. The DEA received seventeen comments on recommendations of the Secretary shall SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the proposed rule; sixteen of the include recommendations with respect commenters (which included law ALJ Docket No. 10–46 to the appropriate schedule, if any, enforcement officials, medical under which such drug * * * should be Background professionals and state regulators) listed.’’ Id. supported the proposed rulemaking.1 This is a proceeding under 21 U.S.C. Finally, ‘‘[t]he recommendations of One entity, Meda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 811(a) for the issuance of a rule placing the Secretary to the Attorney General (Meda), which manufactures the carisoprodol in schedule IV of the shall be binding as to such scientific branded drug Soma, objected to the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Under and medical matters, and if the proposed rule on the ground that the this provision, ‘‘the Attorney General Secretary recommends that a drug ‘‘the administrative record does not may, by rule,’’ add a ‘‘drug or other * * * not be controlled, the Attorney include substantial and reliable substance’’ to one of the five schedules General shall not control the drug evidence of potential for abuse of controlled substances, ‘‘if he * * * * * *. If the Attorney General sufficient to warrant scheduling finds that such drug or other substance determines that these facts and all other carisoprodol and because the proposal has a potential for abuse, and * * * relevant data constitute substantial gives inadequate weight to the negative makes with respect to such drug or evidence of potential for abuse such as impact on patient care of scheduling other substance the findings prescribed to warrant control * * * he shall carisoprodol.’’ ALJ Ex. 2, at 3. Meda also by [21 U.S.C. 812(b)] for the schedule in initiate proceedings for control * * * requested a hearing. Id. at 1. On March which such drug is to be placed.’’ 21 under subsection (a) of this section.’’ Id. 21, 2010, I granted Meda’s request and U.S.C. 811(a). However, a rule made assigned the matter to the Agency’s under this provision ‘‘shall be made on Procedural History Office of Administrative Law Judges the record after opportunity for a Pursuant to section 811(b), in March (ALJ). ALJ Ex. 3, at 2. 1996, the Drug Enforcement hearing pursuant to the rulemaking Following pre-hearing procedures, an Administration (DEA) requested from procedures prescribed by subchapter II ALJ conducted a hearing on July 6, 8, of chapter 5 of Title 5.’’ Id. the Department of Health and Human ‘‘[W]ith respect to each drug * * * Services (HHS) a scientific and medical 1 None of the commenters raised any issue as to proposed to be controlled,’’ the CSA evaluation of carisoprodol, and a the various Regulatory Certifications contained in requires that the Attorney General recommendation as to whether it should the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. See 74 FR at consider eight factors in making the be controlled. ALJ Ex 1, at 3. In 59111. One commenter, which represents wholesale distributors, requested that if the proposed rule is findings required under both February 1997, however, the U.S. Food finalized, its effective date be set at 120 days from subsections 811(a) and 812(b). These and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Drug the date of publication to provide adequate time to are: Abuse Advisory Committee concluded comply with various regulations. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:56 Dec 09, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12DER2.SGM 12DER2 jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 238 / Monday, December 12, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 77331 and 9, as well as on August 3–6, 2010. center, that he could not recall a single The ALJ then discussed three At the hearing, both the Government case of a person being treated at his different human studies. With respect to and Meda elicited the testimony of center for dependence on carisoprodol the Fraser study,2 the ALJ noted that witnesses and introduced various and his opinion that ‘‘the data and Meda’s Expert interpreted the results as documents into evidence. Thereafter, information presented by the FDA and showing that ‘‘ingestions ‘did not both the Government and Meda filed DEA do not establish that carisoprodol induce a characteristic barbiturate briefs containing their proposed has a potential for abuse similar’’ to intoxication pattern * * *, nor did the findings of fact and conclusions of law. schedule IV controlled substances. Id. abrupt withdrawal of carisoprodol reveal any signs of barbiturate-like The ALJ’s Recommended Decision However, the ALJ found ‘‘more compelling’’ data compiled by Meda abstinence’ behavior.’’ Id. at 85. On December 8, 2010, the ALJ issued and the predecessor holders of the New However, the ALJ then noted that ‘‘the her recommended decision. Therein, Drug Application for carisoprodol FDA and the DEA found that the prior to discussing the eight ‘‘factors which had been submitted to the FDA’s subjective and objective effects were determinative of control,’’ 21 U.S.C. Adverse Events Reporting System similar to those of barbiturates or 811(c), the ALJ discussed the weight to (AERS). Id. at 82. This data, which alcohol and different from those of be given the FDA’s findings as to includes reports from consumers and opiates’’ and that the drug ‘‘has scientific and medical matters. ALJ at 6; healthcare practitioners, showed that sedative-like effects.’’ Id. Here again, the see also 21 U.S.C. 811(b). As explained between January 1979 and May 1, 2010, ALJ found FDA’s findings binding on more fully below, the ALJ adopted the there had been ‘‘731 spontaneous the proceeding. Id. Government’s argument that the statute adverse event’’ reports of which eighty- Next, the ALJ discussed the studies ‘‘limits the scope of the administrative three used such terms as abuse, Meda had conducted to obtain FDA hearing to those issues outside of the dependency or withdrawal. Id. at 82–83. approval to market a smaller-strength medical and scientific fact-findings of The ALJ further noted that in 2009, dose.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for the Forensic Analysis of Drugs Facilitating Sexual Assault and Other Criminal Acts
    Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Guidelines for the Forensic analysis of drugs facilitating sexual assault and other criminal acts United Nations publication Printed in Austria ST/NAR/45 *1186331*V.11-86331—December 2011 —300 Photo credits: UNODC Photo Library, iStock.com/Abel Mitja Varela Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Guidelines for the forensic analysis of drugs facilitating sexual assault and other criminal acts UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 ST/NAR/45 © United Nations, December 2011. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. List of abbreviations . v Acknowledgements .......................................... vii 1. Introduction............................................. 1 1.1. Background ........................................ 1 1.2. Purpose and scope of the manual ...................... 2 2. Investigative and analytical challenges ....................... 5 3 Evidence collection ...................................... 9 3.1. Evidence collection kits .............................. 9 3.2. Sample transfer and storage........................... 10 3.3. Biological samples and sampling ...................... 11 3.4. Other samples ...................................... 12 4. Analytical considerations .................................. 13 4.1. Substances encountered in DFSA and other DFC cases .... 13 4.2. Procedures and analytical strategy...................... 14 4.3. Analytical methodology .............................. 15 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0224012 A1 Suvanprakorn Et Al
    US 2004O224012A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0224012 A1 Suvanprakorn et al. (43) Pub. Date: Nov. 11, 2004 (54) TOPICAL APPLICATION AND METHODS Related U.S. Application Data FOR ADMINISTRATION OF ACTIVE AGENTS USING LIPOSOME MACRO-BEADS (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 10/264,205, filed on Oct. 3, 2002. (76) Inventors: Pichit Suvanprakorn, Bangkok (TH); (60) Provisional application No. 60/327,643, filed on Oct. Tanusin Ploysangam, Bangkok (TH); 5, 2001. Lerson Tanasugarn, Bangkok (TH); Suwalee Chandrkrachang, Bangkok Publication Classification (TH); Nardo Zaias, Miami Beach, FL (US) (51) Int. CI.7. A61K 9/127; A61K 9/14 (52) U.S. Cl. ............................................ 424/450; 424/489 Correspondence Address: (57) ABSTRACT Eric G. Masamori 6520 Ridgewood Drive A topical application and methods for administration of Castro Valley, CA 94.552 (US) active agents encapsulated within non-permeable macro beads to enable a wider range of delivery vehicles, to provide longer product shelf-life, to allow multiple active (21) Appl. No.: 10/864,149 agents within the composition, to allow the controlled use of the active agents, to provide protected and designable release features and to provide visual inspection for damage (22) Filed: Jun. 9, 2004 and inconsistency. US 2004/0224012 A1 Nov. 11, 2004 TOPCAL APPLICATION AND METHODS FOR 0006 Various limitations on the shelf-life and use of ADMINISTRATION OF ACTIVE AGENTS USING liposome compounds exist due to the relatively fragile LPOSOME MACRO-BEADS nature of liposomes. Major problems encountered during liposome drug Storage in vesicular Suspension are the chemi CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER cal alterations of the lipoSome compounds, Such as phos APPLICATIONS pholipids, cholesterols, ceramides, leading to potentially toxic degradation of the products, leakage of the drug from 0001) This application claims the benefit of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Anesthetic Barbiturates in Refractory Status Epilepticus
    LE JOURNAL CANADIEN DES SCIENCES NEUROLOGIQUES Anesthetic Barbiturates in Refractory Status Epilepticus G.B. YOUNG, W.T. BLUME, C.F. BOLTON and K.G. WARREN SUMMARY: Two patients with previous INTRODUCTION hours). With intubation and respiratory cerebral damage and seizures and three Generalized status epilepticus is a support an intravenous bolus of 250 mgms. patients with acute inflammatory cerebral medical emergency requiring prompt thiopental was given, followed by 80-120 lesions developed status epilepticus. They mgm/hr. as a continuous infusion for four treatment to prevent cerebral damage days. The seizures stopped promptly. A were unresponsive to standard anticon­ or death. Rapidly acting anticonvuls­ vulsants, but anesthetic barbiturates right-sided hemiparesis resolved over the (thiopental and pentobarbital) stopped the ants such as diazepam, phenytoin or next week and he returned home without seizures promptly. paraldehyde are usually effective. additional neurologicaldeficit. Neurology texts, review articles and Case J. A 41 year old woman developed monographs on epilepsy occasionally measles a week prior to the onset of mention anesthesia for resistant cases. delirium and convulsions. Multi-focal RESUME: Deux patients souffrant pre- Anesthetic barbiturates are less com­ clonic or grand mal seizures continued for alablement de lesion cerebrate et d'epilepsie two days. These were refractory to et trois patients avec lesions cerebrates de monly specified and their effectiveness is not well documented. We present intravenous phenytoin (a loading dose of nature . inflammatoire aigue developpent 1000 mgm intravenously followed by 200 un status epilepticus. Les patients ne five cases successfully treated with mgm every twelve hours), phenobarbital repondent pas a la medication anticon­ anesthetic barbiturates after conven­ (200 mgm intravenous bolus and 60 mgm vulsive standard mais I'emploi de barbitur- tional anticonvulsants failed.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You w ill find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Misperceptions About Contraceptives Persist
    30 Women’s Health FAMILY P RACTICE N EWS • September 1, 2008 Misperceptions About Contraceptives Persist BY DOUG BRUNK trauterine device use; 50% thought IUD (SOGC). There may be inadequate in- Oral contraceptives are also safe in women San Diego Bureau failure was a major risk; and fewer than struction with regard to contraception in older than age 35 if they are healthy non- one-third would recommend an IUD as an physician-training programs, she said. smokers, and in women with systemic lu- C ALGARY, ALTA. — Physicians may option for nulliparous women, for post- “Not everybody does IUD insertions, sub- pus erythematosus provided they have no have a surprising number of misconcep- coital contraception, for women with fi- dermal progestin implant, or vasectomy.” antiphospholipid antibodies, vascular dis- tions about birth control, according to re- broids, or for women who had pelvic in- Other barriers to effective contraceptive ease, or nephritis. cent responses to a survey by 96 family flammatory disease within the last year use include exaggerated concerns about Another common exaggerated concern physicians in Kingston, Ont. (Can. Fam. Physician 2008;54:560-6). potential side effects. For example, women is that the use of oral and transdermal Contrary to evidence in the medical lit- “Only 41% of these physicians inserted with diabetes may use oral contraceptives patch contraceptives cause weight gain. erature, more than 60% of respondents IUDs,” Dr. Amanda Black said at the an- if they have no end-organ damage, said Dr. However, a recent Cochrane systematic re- thought pelvic inflammatory disease and nual meeting of the Society of Obstetri- Black of the division of general obstetrics view of randomized, controlled data con- ectopic pregnancy were major risks of in- cians and Gynaecologists of Canada and gynecology at the Ottawa Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Toxicology Laboratory Office of Chief Medical Examiner City of New York
    FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY OFFICE OF CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER CITY OF NEW YORK CARISOPRODOL , MEPROBAMATE and TOPIRAMATE by SOLID PHASE EXTRACTION and GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY (Selected Ion Monitoring) PRINCIPLE Carisoprodol is a carbamate derivative first synthesized in 1959. It is primarily used as a muscle relaxant. UncontrolledMeprobamate is also a carbamate derivative used as a muscle relaxant and the primary metabolite of carisoprodol. Topiramate is a sulfamate-substituted monosaccharide used as an anticonvulsant Carisoprodol, meprobamate and topiramate are quantitated by a selected ion monitoring (SIM) method using methapyrilene as the internal standard. Carisoprodol, meprobamate and topiramate are extracted from biological specimens by solid phase extraction. Drugs are temporarily bound to a sorbent in the solid phase cartridge as the prepared sample is poured through the column. The column is washed to remove interfering compounds, followed by elution of drugs from the column. The eluate is evaporated, reconstituted and injected in the GCMS. Quantitative analysis is performed by SIM GCMS using a six point calibration curve. SAFETY The handling of all biological specimens and reagents is performed within the guidelines which are detailed in the Safety and Health manual. Copy SPECIMEN PREPARATION The procedure is routinely applied to the following biological specimens and their aliquots unless otherwise specified: Blood 0.5 mL of the undiluted specimen Urine 0.5 mL for qualitative identification Brain 0.5 mL of a 1:3 homogenate Gastric Contents 0.5 mL of a 1:10 dilution Liver 0.5 mL of a 1:5 homogenate Vitreous Humor 0.5 mL of the undiluted specimen Bile 0.5 mL of the undiluted specimen Reviewed by: Date: Page 1 of 14 T:\FINALSOP\FINAL SOP PDF\G.
    [Show full text]
  • Chloral Hydrate and Paraldehyde As Drugs of Addiction
    Sept., 1932J CHLORAL HYDRATE DRUG HABIT : CHOPRA & SINGH CHOPRA 481 certain parts of the Punjab. This is not the outcome of the use of the drug in the treatment Original Articles of insomnia, but is due to entirely different causes. Until a few years ago in that province potable country-made spirits were allowed to CHLORAL HYDRATE AND PARALDE' be sold to retail dealers in bulk and the vendors HYDE AS DRUGS OF ADDICTION bottled the liquor themselves. Some of these ingenious people conceived the idea of diluting R. N. m.d. By CHOPRA, m.a., (Cantab.) the spirit and adding small quantities of chloral I.M.S. LIEUTENANT-COLONEL, hydrate to make up for the loss in its potency and which would result from dilution. The know- GURBAKHSH SINGH CHOPRA, m.b., b.s. ledge that the drug had hypnotic and narcotic was obtained from the (Drug Addiction Inquiry, Indian Research Fund effects undoubtedly Association) medical profession and compounders work- in It was further learnt that Series No. 15 ing dispensaries. the effects chloral hydrate in many Chloral produced by hydrate and paraldehyde belong to resemble those by alcohol, the of ways produced group drugs known as soporifics or especially when the latter is taken in large The chief use of hypnotics. this class of drugs quantities. When the two articles are taken is in the treatment of one insomnia, of the together they act in a manner synergistic to worst evils of modern times from which man- each other and in this way the effect of either kind can suffer.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolism of Drugs in Old Rats (Ii) Metabolism in Vivo and Effect of Drugs in Old Rats
    METABOLISM OF DRUGS IN OLD RATS (II) METABOLISM IN VIVO AND EFFECT OF DRUGS IN OLD RATS RYUICHI KATO AND AKIRA TAKANAKA Department of Pharmacology, National Institute of Hygienic Sciences, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo Received for publication March 16, 1968 It is well known that the effects of some drugs in old animals quite differ from those in young animals. For example, Farner and Verzar (1) observed that the action of am phetamine to increase moter activity was more marked in young rats than in old rats and the action of hexobarbital to antagonized against the amphetamine action was more ef fective in old rats than in young rats. Moreover, the duration of hexobarbital anesthesia was longer in old rats than in young rats (2). Similarly, Petty and Karler (3) observed that anticonvulsive activity of acetazolamide and phenobarbital was more marked in old rats than in young rats. However, there is no study on the mechanism of such altered drug response in rela tion to the rate of drug metabolism. In a previous paper it was reported from our labo ratory that the activities in the oxidation and reduction of drugs and NADPH-linked elec tron transport system in liver microsomes of male and female rats were progressively decreased with aging (4). It is, therefore, of interest to investigate whether or not the metabolism in vivoof vari ous drugs is decreased in old rats in accordance with the decrease in the metabolic activi ties of liver microsomes observed in the in vitro experiments. Moreover, the relationship between the effects of drugs and the rate of in vivo metabolism of drugs in the old rats was studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 16. Crimes and Offenses Chapter 13. Controlled Substances Article 1
    TITLE 16. CRIMES AND OFFENSES CHAPTER 13. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS § 16-13-1. Drug related objects (a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Controlled substance" shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 2 of this chapter, relating to controlled substances. For the purposes of this Code section, the term "controlled substance" shall include marijuana as defined by paragraph (16) of Code Section 16-13-21. (2) "Dangerous drug" shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 3 of this chapter, relating to dangerous drugs. (3) "Drug related object" means any machine, instrument, tool, equipment, contrivance, or device which an average person would reasonably conclude is intended to be used for one or more of the following purposes: (A) To introduce into the human body any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; (B) To enhance the effect on the human body of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; (C) To conceal any quantity of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; or (D) To test the strength, effectiveness, or purity of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state. (4) "Knowingly" means having general knowledge that a machine, instrument, tool, item of equipment, contrivance, or device is a drug related object or having reasonable grounds to believe that any such object is or may, to an average person, appear to be a drug related object.
    [Show full text]
  • INF.20/Rev.1
    INF.20/Rev.1 Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee 17 January 2017 Working Party on the Transport of Dangerous Goods Joint Meeting of Experts on the Regulations annexed to the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Inland Waterways (ADN) (ADN Safety Committee) Thirteenth session Geneva, 23 - 27 January 2017 Item 5 (b) of the provisional agenda Proposals for amendments to the Regulations annexed to ADN: other proposals Autonome Schutzsysteme Mitteilung von EBU, ESO und ERSTU Ausgangslage Zur 29. Sitzung des Sicherheitsausschusses sind zahlreiche Dokumente vorgelegt worden, die die Anforderungen an Explosionsgruppen für nicht-elektrische Geräte betreffen. Weil es aus Zeitgründen nicht möglich war, im ADN 2017 Änderungen vorzunehmen, hat sich der Sicherheitsausschuss darauf geeinigt, die Probleme in der ersten Phase durch multilaterale Abkommen zu regeln. Hierfür ist das Binnenschifffahrtsgewerbe dankbar. Allerdings verlangt die multilaterale Vereinbarung ADN / M 018 von denjenigen Schiffen, deren Zulassungszeugnis nach dem 31. Dezember 2018 erneuert werden muss, schon sehr bald Maßnahmen, die gründlicher Vorbereitung bedürfen. Aus diesem Grunde ist es erforderlich, sich mit einigen vom Schifffahrtsgewerbe aufgeworfenen Fragen rechtzeitig zu beschäftigen. Frage Im Protokoll der 29. Sitzung des Sicherheitsausschusses ADN/WP.15/AC.2/60 ist unter Ziffer 44. festgehalten worden, dass die informelle Arbeitsgruppe „Stoffe“ mittlerweile um die Prüfung verschiedener Sachverhalte gebeten worden ist. Wie weit sind diese Prüfungen gediehen ? Nachfrage zum Protokolls der 29. Sitzung Im Protokoll der 29. Sitzung des Sicherheitsausschusses ADN/WP.15/AC.2/60 ist unter Ziffer 44. – zweiter Unterpunkt - festgehalten worden, dass das Gewerbe die Arbeitsgruppe Stoffe mit einschlägigen Informationen versorgen müsse. Diese Formulierung des Protokolls bedarf der Nachfrage.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Molecular Action of Direct Gating and Allosteric Modulatory Effects of Carisoprodol (Somartm) on GABA a Receptors
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2015 Assessment of molecular action of direct gating and allosteric modulatory effects of carisoprodol (SomaRTM) on GABA A receptors Manoj Kumar Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Kumar, Manoj, "Assessment of molecular action of direct gating and allosteric modulatory effects of carisoprodol (SomaRTM) on GABA A receptors" (2015). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 6022. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6022 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASSESSMENT OF MOLECULAR ACTION OF DIRECT GATING AND ALLOSTERIC MODULATORY EFFECTS OF MEPROBAMATE (MILTOWN®) ON GABAA RECEPTORS Manish Kumar, MD, MS Dissertation submitted to the School of Pharmacy at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 64.59 KB, for Carisoprodol Letter
    The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Office of Medicaid 600 Washington Street Boston, MA 02111 MITT ROMNEY TIMOTHY MURPHY Secretary Governor KERRY HEALEY BETH WALDMAN Medicaid Director Lieutenant Governor September 1, 2005 Dear Prescriber: As of October 3, 2005, all products containing carisoprodol will require prior authorization when prescribed for MassHealth members. This change reflects MassHealth’s and the Drug Utilization Review (DUR) Board’s review of carisoprodol. Carisoprodol has shown limited efficacy in the relief of acute pain associated with musculoskeletal conditions, as an adjunct to rest, physical therapy, and other measures. Carisoprodol does not act directly on the skeletal muscles, but its effects are thought to be related to its sedative properties. Carisoprodol is metabolized to meprobamate, a Schedule IV anxiolytic with a known potential for abuse. According to data collected by the Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), a surveillance system operated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, carisoprodol had a similar abuse pattern to meprobamate. Carisoprodol abuse was often identified in combination with other drugs of abuse such as benzodiazepines, opioid analgesics, alcohol and barbiturates*. Carisoprodol abuse can lead to seizures, coma, and death. The MassHealth Drug List can be found at www.mass.gov/druglist. We would encourage you to review the site because it provides valuable information about the pharmacy benefit for MassHealth members. Specifically, the List lets you know which drugs require prior authorization in the MassHealth program and provides other useful clinical information. We also encourage you to use the MassHealth Web site to subscribe to our service that will automatically send you e-mail alerts when the MassHealth Drug List is updated.
    [Show full text]