DOCSLIB.ORG

Drug Class Review on Skeletal Muscle Relaxants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drug Class Review on Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Drug Class Review on Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Final Report Update 2 May 2005 Original Report Date: April 2003 Update 1 Report Date: January 2004 A literature scan of this topic is done periodically The purpose of this report is to make available information regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of different drugs within pharmaceutical classes. Reports are not usage guidelines, nor should they be read as an endorsement of, or recommendation for, any particular drug, use or approach. Oregon Health & Science University does not recommend or endorse any guideline or recommendation developed by users of these reports. Roger Chou, MD Kim Peterson, MS Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Oregon Health & Science University Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, Director Copyright © 2005 by Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon 97201. All rights reserved. Note: A scan of the medical literature relating to the topic is done periodically (see http://www.ohsu.edu/ohsuedu/research/policycenter/DERP/about/methods.cfm for scanning process description). Upon review of the last scan, the Drug Effectiveness Review Project governance group elected not to proceed with another full update of this report. Some portions of the report may not be up to date. Prior versions of this report can be accessed at the DERP website. Final Report Update 2 Drug Effectiveness Review Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................................................................................................4 Scope and Key Questions ........................................................................................5 Methods...............................................................................................................................8 Literature Search......................................................................................................8 Study Selection........................................................................................................9 Data Abstraction....................................................................................................10 Quality Assessment................................................................................................10 Data Synthesis........................................................................................................11 Results ...............................................................................................................................12 Key Question 1. Symptoms and functional outcomes...........................................14 Key Question 2. Incidence and nature of adverse effects......................................21 Key Question 3. Subpopulations............................................................................28 Summary...........................................................................................................................29 References.........................................................................................................................30 Tables Table 1. Overview of included systematic reviews on skeletal muscle relaxants.........................................................................41 Table 2. Overview of head-to-head trials of skeletal muscle relaxants for spasticity............................................................................................47 Table 3. Overview of placebo-controlled trials of included skeletal muscle relaxants.........................................................................51 Table 4. Overview of head-to-head trials of skeletal muscle relaxants for musculoskeletal conditions .....................................................................54 Table 5. Overview of placebo-controlled trials of skeletal muscle relaxants for musculoskeletal conditions .....................................................................57 Table 6. Adverse events, head-to-head trials of skeletal muscle relaxants for spasticity............................................................................................62 Table 7. Adverse events, placebo-controlled trials of skeletal muscle relaxants for spasticity............................................................................................66 Table 8. Adverse events, head-to-head trials of skeletal muscle relaxants for musculoskeletal conditions .....................................................................69 Table 9. Adverse events, placebo-controlled trials of skeletal muscle relaxants for musculoskeletal conditions ...............................................................71 Table 10. Summary of evidence ............................................................................75 Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Page 2 of 237 Final Report Update 2 Drug Effectiveness Review Project Evidence Tables Evidence Table 1. Included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of skeletal muscle relaxants in patients with spasticity.............................79 Evidence Table 2. Included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of skeletal muscle relaxants in patients with musculoskeletal conditions.................................................................................89 Evidence Table 3. Head-to-head trials of skeletal muscle relaxants in patients with spasticity ..........................................................................95 Evidence Table 4. Placebo-controlled trials of skeletal muscle relaxants in patients with spasticity...........................................................125 Evidence Table 5. Head-to-head trials of skeletal muscle relaxants in patients with musculoskeletal conditions............................................165 Evidence Table 6. Placebo-controlled trials of skeletal muscle relaxants in patients with musculoskeletal conditions ..........................185 Appendix A: Search Strategy...........................................................................................225 Appendix B: Clinical Trials Search Results ....................................................................231 Appendix C: Methods for Drug Class Reviews...............................................................232 Appendix D: Abstraction Tool for Adverse Effects ........................................................236 Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Page 3 of 237 Final Report Update 2 Drug Effectiveness Review Project INTRODUCTION Skeletal muscle relaxants are a heterogeneous group of medications commonly used to treat two different types of underlying conditions: spasticity from upper motor neuron syndromes and muscular pain or spasms from peripheral musculoskeletal conditions. Although they have by convention been classified into one group, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved only a few medications in this class for treatment of spasticity; the remainder are approved for treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES III) survey (1988-1994) estimated that 1% of American adults are taking muscle relaxants, often on a chronic basis.1 Spasticity, although difficult to define precisely, is a clinical condition that has been described as “a motor disorder characterized by velocity dependent increase in tonic stretch reflexes (muscle tone) with exaggerated tendon jerks, resulting from hyper-excitability of the stretch reflex, as one component of the upper motor neuron syndrome.”2 The upper motor neuron syndrome is a complex of signs and symptoms that, in addition to spasticity, can be associated with exaggerated cutaneous reflexes, autonomic hyperreflexia, dystonia, contractures, paresis, lack of dexterity, and fatigability.3 Spasticity from the upper motor neuron syndrome can result from a variety of conditions affecting the cortex or spinal cord. Some of the more common conditions associated with spasticity and requiring treatment include multiple sclerosis,4 spinal cord injury,5 traumatic brain injury, cerebral palsy, and post- stroke syndrome.6 In many patients with these conditions, spasticity can be disabling and painful with a marked effect on functional ability and quality of life.7 Common musculoskeletal conditions causing tenderness and muscle spasms include fibromyalgia,8 tension headaches,9 myofascial pain syndrome, and mechanical low back or neck pain. If muscle spasm is present in these conditions, it is related to local factors involving the affected muscle groups. There is no hypertonicity or hyperreflexia, and the other symptoms associated with the upper motor neuron syndrome are not present. These conditions are commonly encountered in clinical practice and can cause significant disability and pain in some patients. Skeletal muscle relaxants are one of several classes of medications (including antidepressants, neuroleptics, anti-inflammatory agents, and opioids) frequently used to treat these conditions.10-12 Skeletal muscle relaxants have been approved for either treatment of spasticity or for treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. Drugs classified as skeletal muscle relaxants are baclofen, carisoprodol, chlorzoxazone, cyclobenzaprine, dantrolene, metaxalone, methocarbamol, orphenadrine, and tizanidine. Only baclofen, dantrolene, and tizanidine are approved for the treatment of spasticity. These three antispasticity medications act by different 13, 14 mechanisms: baclofen blocks pre- and post-synaptic GABAB receptors, tizanidine is a centrally acting agonist of α2 receptors,15, 16 and dantrolene directly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What's the Best First Line Anticonvulsant?
    What’s the best first line anticonvulsant? Stephen Hanson, DVM, MS, Dip. ACVIM (Neurology) Recurring seizure activity is a relatively common problem in canine patients. Nowadays, there are several good options for medical treatment, which makes the choice of which drug to use a little more complicated. All anticonvulsant drugs have advantages and disadvantages, so the selection of a first-line drug should be tailored for the individual patient and client. Phenobarbital: This has been the standard first choice drug for decades. The nice thing about Phenobarbital is that it works fairly well, controlling seizures in about 70% of dogs with epilepsy. Also, it is inexpensive and readily available. The biggest down-sides are its induction of hepatic metabolism and the need for frequent upward dose adjustments, as well as its potential to cause hepatotoxicity. The potential for liver disease increases with time, so a 2 year old dog placed on this medication is more likely to develop hepatotoxicity in his life-time than a 10 year old dog. Phenobarbital can also cause sedation and ataxia. While this is usually mild/transient, it can be a real problem in dogs with other pre- existing signs of intracranial disease. Polyuria, polydipsia and polyphagia are other common side effects. These signs vary widely in severity between patients. Pros: cheap, available at any corner pharmacy, works well Cons: higher doses required with time, possible serious liver side-effects Good first-line choice for middle-aged to older dogs without any pre-existing liver issues Poor choice for dogs with liver disease, dogs with other intracranial signs Questionable choice for young epileptic dogs Potassium/sodium bromide: This was the most commonly-used add on anticonvulsant drug for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Once-Daily Skeletal Muscle Relaxant in SA
    NEWS Once-daily skeletal muscle relaxant in SA Myprocam (cyclobenzaprine with spine-related disorders and other 8. What are the classes of muscle a protective coating, and a polymer extended release [ER] sports injuries are excellent candidates relaxants? membrane that controls the rate of hydrochloride) is the most widely for Myprocam. Skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs) are drug release. prescribed skeletal muscle a group of structurally unrelated drugs, The formulation of the drug relaxant in the US, is now available 4. What are the common as shown in Figure 1. These are divided ensures early systemic exposure in SA. Myprocam’s safety and efficacy indications for which Myprocam into two categories: to cyclobenzaprine, with a plasma has been shown in more than 20 clinical is used, and what are the common • Antispasticity agents: Used to concentration at four hours that trials. It was recently launched by causes of these ailments? treat muscle spasticity caused by is similar to that observed with Adcock Ingram nationally, making SA Low back pain, neck pain, sports traumatic neurologic injury, multiple cyclobenzaprine IR. the second country (only to the US) to injuries, muscle sprains and strains. sclerosis, and other conditions. However, in contrast to the bring the product to market. Common causes of these conditions • Antispasmodic agents: Used fluctuating peaks and troughs in Myprocam, indicated for the relief of include sports injuries, car accidents, to treat muscular pain or spasm plasma cyclobenzaprine concentration muscle spasm associated with acute work-related injuries, and everyday associated with acute, nonspecific after administration of the IR and painful musculoskeletal conditions, activities, which account for acute musculoskeletal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • CHLORZOXAZONE- Chlorzoxazone Tablet DIRECT RX ------CHLORZOXAZONE
    CHLORZOXAZONE- chlorzoxazone tablet DIRECT RX ---------- CHLORZOXAZONE DESCRIPTION SECTION Chlorzoxazone USP is a centrally acting skeletal muscle relaxant, available as tablets of 500 mg for oral administration. Its chemical name is 5-Chloro-2-benzoxazolinone, and its structural formula is: C7H4CINO2 MW 169.57 Chlorzoxazone USP is a white or practically white, practically odorless, crystalline powder. Chlorzoxazone is slightly soluble in water; sparingly soluble in alcohol, in isopropyl alcohol, and in methanol; soluble in solutions of alkali hydroxides and ammonia. Chlorzoxazone tablets contain the inactive ingredients Docusate Sodium, Lactose (hydrous), Magnesium Stearate, Microcrystalline Cellulose, Pregelatinized Starch, Sodium Benzoate, and Sodium Starch Glycolate. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY SECTION Chlorzoxazone is a centrally-acting agent for painful musculoskeletal conditions. Data available from animal experiments as well as human study indicate that chlorzoxazone acts primarily at the level of the spinal cord and subcortical areas of the brain where it inhibits multisynaptic reflex arcs involved in producing and maintaining skeletal muscle spasm of varied etiology. The clinical result is a reduction of the skeletal muscle spasm with relief of pain and increased mobility of the involved muscles. Blood levels of chlorzoxazone can be detected in people during the first 30 minutes and peak levels may be reached, in the majority of the subjects, in about 1 to 2 hours after oral administration of chlorzoxazone. Chlorzoxazone is rapidly metabolized and is excreted in the urine, primarily in a conjugated form as the glucuronide. Less than one percent of a dose of chlorzoxazone is excreted unchanged in the urine in 24 hours. INDICATIONS & USAGE SECTION Chlorzoxazone is indicated as an adjunct to rest, physical therapy, and other measures for the relief of discomfort associated with acute, painful musculoskeletal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Drugs List
    ^ ^ ^ ^ ^[ ^ The National Drugs List Of Syrian Arab Republic Sexth Edition 2006 ! " # "$ % &'() " # * +$, -. / & 0 /+12 3 4" 5 "$ . "$ 67"5,) 0 " /! !2 4? @ % 88 9 3: " # "$ ;+<=2 – G# H H2 I) – 6( – 65 : A B C "5 : , D )* . J!* HK"3 H"$ T ) 4 B K<) +$ LMA N O 3 4P<B &Q / RS ) H< C4VH /430 / 1988 V W* < C A GQ ") 4V / 1000 / C4VH /820 / 2001 V XX K<# C ,V /500 / 1992 V "!X V /946 / 2004 V Z < C V /914 / 2003 V ) < ] +$, [2 / ,) @# @ S%Q2 J"= [ &<\ @ +$ LMA 1 O \ . S X '( ^ & M_ `AB @ &' 3 4" + @ V= 4 )\ " : N " # "$ 6 ) G" 3Q + a C G /<"B d3: C K7 e , fM 4 Q b"$ " < $\ c"7: 5) G . HHH3Q J # Hg ' V"h 6< G* H5 !" # $%" & $' ,* ( )* + 2 ا اوا ادو +% 5 j 2 i1 6 B J' 6<X " 6"[ i2 "$ "< * i3 10 6 i4 11 6! ^ i5 13 6<X "!# * i6 15 7 G!, 6 - k 24"$d dl ?K V *4V h 63[46 ' i8 19 Adl 20 "( 2 i9 20 G Q) 6 i10 20 a 6 m[, 6 i11 21 ?K V $n i12 21 "% * i13 23 b+ 6 i14 23 oe C * i15 24 !, 2 6\ i16 25 C V pq * i17 26 ( S 6) 1, ++ &"r i19 3 +% 27 G 6 ""% i19 28 ^ Ks 2 i20 31 % Ks 2 i21 32 s * i22 35 " " * i23 37 "$ * i24 38 6" i25 39 V t h Gu* v!* 2 i26 39 ( 2 i27 40 B w< Ks 2 i28 40 d C &"r i29 42 "' 6 i30 42 " * i31 42 ":< * i32 5 ./ 0" -33 4 : ANAESTHETICS $ 1 2 -1 :GENERAL ANAESTHETICS AND OXYGEN 4 $1 2 2- ATRACURIUM BESYLATE DROPERIDOL ETHER FENTANYL HALOTHANE ISOFLURANE KETAMINE HCL NITROUS OXIDE OXYGEN PROPOFOL REMIFENTANIL SEVOFLURANE SUFENTANIL THIOPENTAL :LOCAL ANAESTHETICS !67$1 2 -5 AMYLEINE HCL=AMYLOCAINE ARTICAINE BENZOCAINE BUPIVACAINE CINCHOCAINE LIDOCAINE MEPIVACAINE OXETHAZAINE PRAMOXINE PRILOCAINE PREOPERATIVE MEDICATION & SEDATION FOR 9*: ;< " 2 -8 : : SHORT -TERM PROCEDURES ATROPINE DIAZEPAM INJ.
    [Show full text]
  • LORZONE- Chlorzoxazone Tablet Vertical Pharmaceuticals , LLC ---For Painful Musculoskeletal Conditions PRESCRIBING INFOR
    LORZONE- chlorzoxazone tablet Vertical Pharmaceuticals , LLC ---------- For Painful Musculoskeletal Conditions PRESCRIBING INFORMATION DESCRIPTION Each 375 mg Lorzone® tablet contains: chlorzoxazone USP 375 mg. Each 750 mg Lorzone® tablet contains: chlorzoxazone USP 750 mg. Chemical Name: 5-Chloro-2-benzoxazolinone. Structural Formula: Molecular Formula: C7H4CINO2 Molecular Weight: 169.56 Chlorzoxazone USP is a white or practically white, practically odorless, crystalline powder. Chlorzoxazone is slightly soluble in water; sparingly soluble in alcohol, in isopropyl alcohol, and in methanol; soluble in solutions of alkali hydroxides and ammonia. Inactive ingredients: anhydrous lactose, croscarmellose sodium, docusate sodium, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, pregelatinized corn starch and sodium benzoate. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Chlorzoxazone is a centrally-acting agent for painful musculoskeletal conditions. Data available from animal experiments as well as human study indicate that chlorzoxazone acts primarily at the level of the spinal cord and subcortical areas of the brain where it inhibits multisynaptic reflex arcs involved in producing and maintaining skeletal muscle spasm of varied etiology. The clinical result is a reduction of the skeletal muscle spasm with relief of pain and increased mobility of the involved muscles. Blood levels of chlorzoxazone can be detected in people during the first 30 minutes and peak levels may be reached, in the majority of the subjects, in about 1 to 2 hours after oral administration of chlorzoxazone. Chlorzoxazone is rapidly metabolized and is excreted in the urine, primarily in a conjugated form as the glucuronide. Less than one percent of a dose of chlorzoxazone is excreted unchanged in the urine in 24 hours. INDICATIONS AND USAGE Lorzone® is indicated as an adjunct to rest, physical therapy, and other measures for the relief of discomfort associated with acute, painful musculoskeletal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam Msc and Allister Vale MD
    Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam MSc and Allister Vale MD April 2015 CONTENTS General Toxicology 9 Metals 44 Management 22 Pesticides 49 Drugs 23 Chemical Warfare 51 Chemical Incidents & 36 Plants 52 Pollution Chemicals 37 Animals 52 CURRENT AWARENESS PAPERS OF THE MONTH Acute toxicity profile of tolperisone in overdose: observational poison centre-based study Martos V, Hofer KE, Rauber-Lüthy C, Schenk-Jaeger KM, Kupferschmidt H, Ceschi A. Clin Toxicol 2015; online early: doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1022896: Introduction Tolperisone is a centrally acting muscle relaxant that acts by blocking voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels. There is a lack of information on the clinical features of tolperisone poisoning in the literature. The aim of this study was to investigate the demographics, circumstances and clinical features of acute overdoses with tolperisone. Methods An observational study of acute overdoses of tolperisone, either alone or in combination with one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in a dose range not expected to cause central nervous system effects, in adults and children (< 16 years), reported to our poison centre between 1995 and 2013. Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology is produced monthly for the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology by the Birmingham Unit of the UK National Poisons Information Service, with contributions from the Cardiff, Edinburgh, and Newcastle Units. The NPIS is commissioned by Public Health England Results 75 cases were included: 51 females (68%) and 24 males (32%); 45 adults (60%) and 30 children (40%). Six adults (13%) and 17 children (57%) remained asymptomatic, and mild symptoms were seen in 25 adults (56%) and 10 children (33%).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 4,722,938 Sunshine Et Al
    United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 4,722,938 Sunshine et al. (45. Date of Patent: Feb. 2, 1988 (54 METHODS FOR USING 82,717, copy of patent and English translation thereof; MUSCULOSKELETAL RELAXANTS (10/83). Rego, "Mio-Relaxantes No Tratmento Das Lombalgias 75 Inventors: Abraham Sunshine, New York; Agudas E Das Lombo-Ciaticas Recentes'Muscle Re Eugene M. Laska, Larchmont; laxants in the Treatment of Acute Lumbalgias and Re Carole E. Siegel, Mamaroneck, all of cent Lumbo-Sciatica Cases, Acta Reumatologica Por N.Y. tuguesa, II, 2:363-364, (1974), copy of the original and English translation thereof. 73 Assignee: Analgesic Associates, Larchmont, Schror, "Analgetisch-Antiphlogistische Therapie Von N.Y. Schmerzzustanden des Bewegungsapparates'Anal 21 Appl. No.: 815,502 gesic-Antiphlogistic Therapy of Locomotor System Pain), Therapiewoche, 28, 5657-5663, (1978), copy of the (22 Filed: Jan. 2, 1986 original and English translation thereof. Schar, "Medikamentose Behandlung von Lumbois Related U.S. Application Data chialgien'Drug Treatment of the Lumbago-Sciatic Syndrome), Schweiz, Rundschau Med. (Praxis), vol. 68, 63 Continuation of Ser. No. 686,380, Dec. 26, 1984, aban No. 5, pp. 141-142, (Jan. 30, 1979), copy of original doned. article and English translation thereof. 51 Int. Cl....................... A61K 31/19; A61K 31/27 Kolodny and Klipper, "Bone and Joint Diseases in the Elderly', Hospital Practice, pp. 91-101, (Nov. 1976). (52) - O - 514/479; 514/568 Nascimento, "Use of an Association Containing an An 58 Field of Search ................................ 514/568, 479 algesic, a Muscle Relaxant and Vitamin B Complex in (56) References Cited Degenerative Joint Diseases, Extra-Articular Rheu matic Ailments and Traumatic Afflictions', F med, FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (BR), 83(3):361-363, (1981), original article and English 2121529 12/1971 France.
    [Show full text]
  • Symptomatic Pharmacotherapy in ALS: Data Analysis from a Platform-Based Medication Management Programme
    PostScript J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp-2020-322938 on 21 April 2020. Downloaded from LETTER during the observation. Riluzole was ALS were provided with a mean number the drug most commonly used (93% of 3.2 symptomatic drugs. However, of patients; n=2219). Symptomatic the number of drugs per patient varied Symptomatic pharmacotherapy drugs were assorted to pharmacological substantially (figure 1D). Furthermore, in ALS: data analysis from a domains and to the attainment of treat- we identified an increasing number of ment goals (figure 1B). An overview prescribed drugs per patient in correla- platform- based medication and ranking of symptomatic drugs are tion to advanced stages of King’s clinical management programme summarised in the online supplementary stages of ALS (figure 1C).4 file 2. Based on the number of patients who received the drug, the following top INTRODUCTION 10 symptomatic medicines were identi- DISCUSSION Although symptomatic medicines fied (in decreasing order): mirtazapine, The symptomatic medication was anal- constitute an important intervention ipratropium bromide, pirenzepine, ysed at specialised ALS centres in in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), citalopram, lorazepam, baclofen, metam- Germany collaborating on multidisci- few systematic investigations into drug izole, quinine, fentanyl and tetrahydro- plinary managed care. Data assessment management have been reported so far.1 cannabinol:cannabidiol. Patients with was facilitated by the common use of Furthermore, symptomatic pharmaco- therapy is constantly evolving with an increasing number of drugs being used. Therefore, more detailed information on drug prescription must be obtained to monitor the current standards of care, identify potential shortcomings in drug management and elucidate progress in symptomatic pharmacotherapy.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0224012 A1 Suvanprakorn Et Al
    US 2004O224012A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0224012 A1 Suvanprakorn et al. (43) Pub. Date: Nov. 11, 2004 (54) TOPICAL APPLICATION AND METHODS Related U.S. Application Data FOR ADMINISTRATION OF ACTIVE AGENTS USING LIPOSOME MACRO-BEADS (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 10/264,205, filed on Oct. 3, 2002. (76) Inventors: Pichit Suvanprakorn, Bangkok (TH); (60) Provisional application No. 60/327,643, filed on Oct. Tanusin Ploysangam, Bangkok (TH); 5, 2001. Lerson Tanasugarn, Bangkok (TH); Suwalee Chandrkrachang, Bangkok Publication Classification (TH); Nardo Zaias, Miami Beach, FL (US) (51) Int. CI.7. A61K 9/127; A61K 9/14 (52) U.S. Cl. ............................................ 424/450; 424/489 Correspondence Address: (57) ABSTRACT Eric G. Masamori 6520 Ridgewood Drive A topical application and methods for administration of Castro Valley, CA 94.552 (US) active agents encapsulated within non-permeable macro beads to enable a wider range of delivery vehicles, to provide longer product shelf-life, to allow multiple active (21) Appl. No.: 10/864,149 agents within the composition, to allow the controlled use of the active agents, to provide protected and designable release features and to provide visual inspection for damage (22) Filed: Jun. 9, 2004 and inconsistency. US 2004/0224012 A1 Nov. 11, 2004 TOPCAL APPLICATION AND METHODS FOR 0006 Various limitations on the shelf-life and use of ADMINISTRATION OF ACTIVE AGENTS USING liposome compounds exist due to the relatively fragile LPOSOME MACRO-BEADS nature of liposomes. Major problems encountered during liposome drug Storage in vesicular Suspension are the chemi CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER cal alterations of the lipoSome compounds, Such as phos APPLICATIONS pholipids, cholesterols, ceramides, leading to potentially toxic degradation of the products, leakage of the drug from 0001) This application claims the benefit of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You w ill find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Muscle Relaxers Long Term
    Taking Muscle Relaxers Long Term Teeny and saltant Yankee sortes while inappreciable Gabriell razzes her curtailment apace and redeploy argumentatively. Interior-sprung Laurence hoarsens no electrodes quarrelled inscrutably after Puff participate currently, quite quick-witted. Scot gibbers untimely if step-up Torry palavers or overdid. Why you think properly and are already have been associated with multiple sclerosis, or cdc or glycerol injection. Neck pain is a muscle spasms or other muscle relaxers are taking a supervised detox. Signs of a Cyclobenzaprine Overdose? NSAIDs and acetaminophen in high doses, or if god for making long both, can cause serious side effects. Down Arrow keys to bloat or in volume. The serious risks associated with long-term NSAID benzodiazepine. Com is there a subsidiary of flexeril abuse was generally prescribed mainly because we may help manage your liver or trigger points on your doctor? Greenhouse treatment at risk when this medicine, if a long term. Muscle relaxants used at random have been shown to relieve immediate pain. Will i need something that she previously worked as long term treatment provider a long term rehab better if they work. They may have shown one is comprised of visits, dr leonard said, take it in the aim of? Pomona, NY: Barr Laboratories. Then research demonstrated that prolonged bedrest was use a bad repair It he no better and what worse than taking it secret for hour day his two. Flexeril without a prescription or using it in a manner utilize it is something intended example be used. Long-term Flexeril use can sure to withdrawal symptoms Learn better about the symptoms and surpass to safely quit taking study drug.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Manifestation of Juvenile and Pediatric HD Patients: a Retrospective Case Series
    brain sciences Article Clinical Manifestation of Juvenile and Pediatric HD Patients: A Retrospective Case Series 1, , 2, 2 1 Jannis Achenbach * y, Charlotte Thiels y, Thomas Lücke and Carsten Saft 1 Department of Neurology, Huntington Centre North Rhine-Westphalia, St. Josef-Hospital Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany; [email protected] 2 Department of Neuropaediatrics and Social Paediatrics, University Children’s Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany; [email protected] (C.T.); [email protected] (T.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] These two authors contribute to this paper equally. y Received: 30 April 2020; Accepted: 1 June 2020; Published: 3 June 2020 Abstract: Background: Studies on the clinical manifestation and course of disease in children suffering from Huntington’s disease (HD) are rare. Case reports of juvenile HD (onset 20 years) describe ≤ heterogeneous motoric and non-motoric symptoms, often accompanied with a delay in diagnosis. We aimed to describe this rare group of patients, especially with regard to socio-medical aspects and individual or common treatment strategies. In addition, we differentiated between juvenile and the recently defined pediatric HD population (onset < 18 years). Methods: Out of 2593 individual HD patients treated within the last 25 years in the Huntington Centre, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), 32 subjects were analyzed with an early onset younger than 21 years (1.23%, juvenile) and 18 of them younger than 18 years of age (0.69%, pediatric). Results: Beside a high degree of school problems, irritability or aggressive behavior (62.5% of pediatric and 31.2% of juvenile cases), serious problems concerning the social and family background were reported in 25% of the pediatric cohort.
    [Show full text]