DOCSLIB.ORG

The Proposed Life Solar Plant Near Postmasburg, Northern Cape Province

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Proposed Life Solar Plant Near Postmasburg, Northern Cape Province FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 7 October 2016 THE PROPOSED LIFE SOLAR PLANT NEAR POSTMASBURG, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE PROJECT DETAIL DEA Reference No. : 14/12/16/3/3/2/933 Project Title : Proposed Life Solar Plant near Olifantshoek, Northern Cape Province Authors : Mrs. Carli Otte Ms. Marelie Griesel Ms. Liesl de Swardt Client : Life Solar (RF) (Pty) Ltd. Report Status : Final Environmental Impact Report Submission date : 7 October 2016 When used as a reference this report should be cited as: Environamics (2016) Final EIR: Proposed Life Solar Plant near Postmasburg, Northern Cape Province. COPYRIGHT RESERVED This technical report has been produced for Life Solar (RF) (Pty) Ltd. The intellectual property contained in this report remains vested in Environamics and Life Solar (RF) (Pty) Ltd. No part of the report may be reproduced in any manner without written permission from Environamics or Life Solar (RF) (Pty) Ltd. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT DETAIL .....................................................................................................................1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................2 LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................5 LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................................5 LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................6 APPENDICES ..........................................................................................................................7 GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS ..................................................................................8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 10 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 13 1.1 LEGAL MANDATE AND PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ............................................................ 13 1.2 DETAILS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER (EAP) .......................... 15 1.3 DETAILS OF SPECIALISTS ................................................................................................... 15 1.4 STATUS OF THE EIA PROCESS ............................................................................................ 19 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT ............................................................................................. 20 2 ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................ 24 2.1 THE LOCATION OF THE ACTIVITY AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ..................................... 24 2.2 ACTIVITY DESRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 25 2.3 PHOTOVOLTAIC TECHNOLOGY ......................................................................................... 27 2.4 LAYOUT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 28 2.5 SERVICES PROVISION ........................................................................................................ 30 3 LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY CONTEXT .......................................................................... 35 3.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 35 3.2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ...................................................................................................... 37 3.3 POLICY CONTEXT ............................................................................................................... 41 2 3.4 OTHER LEGISLATION ......................................................................................................... 49 3.5 RELEVANT GUIDANCE ....................................................................................................... 49 3.6 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................... 49 4 THE NEED AND DESIRABILITY ................................................................................... 50 4.1 THE NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY ......................................................................... 50 4.2 THE DESIRABILITY OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY ............................................................... 50 5 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ............................................................... 54 5.1 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................. 54 5.1.1 No-go alternative .............................................................................................................. 55 5.1.2 Location alternatives ......................................................................................................... 55 5.1.3 Activity alternatives .......................................................................................................... 56 5.1.4 Technical alternatives ....................................................................................................... 57 5.1.5 Design and layout alternatives ......................................................................................... 59 5.1.6 Technology alternatives .................................................................................................... 60 5.2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS ..................................................................................... 61 5.2.1 General .............................................................................................................................. 61 5.2.2 Consultation process......................................................................................................... 66 5.2.3 Registered I&APs ............................................................................................................... 66 5.2.4 Issues raised by I&APs and consultation bodies ............................................................... 66 5.3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 67 5.3.1 Biophysical environment .................................................................................................. 67 5.3.2 Description of the socio-economic environment ............................................................. 79 5.4 SITE SELECTION MATRIX ................................................................................................... 82 5.5 CONCLUDING STATEMENT ON ALTERNATIVES................................................................. 88 6 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPACTS AND RISKS................................................................ 89 6.1 SCOPING METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................ 90 6.1.1 Checklist analysis .............................................................................................................. 90 3 6.1.2 Matrix analysis .................................................................................................................. 92 6.2 KEY ISSUES IDENTIFIED ................................................................................................... 107 6.2.1 Impacts during the construction phase .......................................................................... 107 6.2.2 Impacts during the operational phase ............................................................................ 107 6.2.3 Impacts during the decommissioning phase .................................................................. 107 7 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ....................................................................... 121 7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 121 7.2 Geographic Area of Evaluation ....................................................................................... 122 7.3 Temporal Boundary of Evaluation .................................................................................. 123 7.4 OTHER PROJECTS IN THE AREA ....................................................................................... 123 7.4.1 Existing projects in the area ............................................................................................ 123 7.4.2 Projects in the foreseeable future .................................................................................. 124 7.5 SPECIALIST INFORMATION ON CUMULATIVE EFFECTS................................................... 124 7.5.1 Geology ........................................................................................................................... 126 7.5.2 Soil, Land Capability and Agricultural Potential .............................................................. 127 7.5.3 Ecology ............................................................................................................................ 127 7.5.4 Birds ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Explore the Northern Cape Province
    Cultural Guiding - Explore The Northern Cape Province When Schalk van Niekerk traded all his possessions for an 83.5 carat stone owned by the Griqua Shepard, Zwartboy, Sir Richard Southey, Colonial Secretary of the Cape, declared with some justification: “This is the rock on which the future of South Africa will be built.” For us, The Star of South Africa, as the gem became known, shines not in the East, but in the Northern Cape. (Tourism Blueprint, 2006) 2 – WildlifeCampus Cultural Guiding Course – Northern Cape Module # 1 - Province Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Province Overview Module # 2 - Cultural Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Cultural Overview Module # 3 - Historical Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Historical Overview Module # 4 - Wildlife and Nature Conservation Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Wildlife and Nature Conservation Overview Module # 5 - Namaqualand Component # 1 - Namaqualand Component # 2 - The Hantam Karoo Component # 3 - Towns along the N14 Component # 4 - Richtersveld Component # 5 - The West Coast Module # 5 - Karoo Region Component # 1 - Introduction to the Karoo and N12 towns Component # 2 - Towns along the N1, N9 and N10 Component # 3 - Other Karoo towns Module # 6 - Diamond Region Component # 1 - Kimberley Component # 2 - Battlefields and towns along the N12 Module # 7 - The Green Kalahari Component # 1 – The Green Kalahari Module # 8 - The Kalahari Component # 1 - Kuruman and towns along the N14 South and R31 Northern Cape Province Overview This course material is the copyrighted intellectual property of WildlifeCampus. It may not be copied, distributed or reproduced in any format whatsoever without the express written permission of WildlifeCampus. 3 – WildlifeCampus Cultural Guiding Course – Northern Cape Module 1 - Component 1 Northern Cape Province Overview Introduction Diamonds certainly put the Northern Cape on the map, but it has far more to offer than these shiny stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Griqua Identity – and Often As Equally Contested - Is the Matter of Terminology
    INTRODUCTION Most scholars acknowledge that the origins of the Griqua people are rooted in the complex relationships between autochthonous KhoeSan, slaves, Africans and European settlers. Coupled with the intricacies that underpin the issue of Griqua identity – and often as equally contested - is the matter of terminology. Christopher Saunders and Nicholas Southey describe the Griquas as Pastoralists of Khoikhoi and mixed descent, initially known as Bastards or Basters, who left the Cape in the late 18th century under their first leader, Adam Kok 1 (c.1710- c.1795).1 They explain the name „bastards‟ as [The] term used in the 18th century for the offspring of mixed unions of whites with people of colour, most commonly Khoikhoi but also, less frequently, slaves.”2 Even in the context of post-apartheid South Africa, issues of identity and ethnicity continue to dominate the literature of the Griqua people. As the South African social anthropologist, Linda Waldman, writes: The Griqua comprise an extremely diverse category of South Africans. They are defined 3 neither by geographical boundaries nor by cultural practices. Waldman goes on to illustrate the complexities surrounding attempts to categorise the Griqua people by explaining how the Griqua have been described by some as a sub-category of the Coloured people,4 by others as either constituting a separate ethnic group,5 by others as not constituting a separate ethnic group6, and by still others as a nation.7 1 Christopher Saunders and Nicholas Southey, A dictionary of South African history. Cape Town: David Philip, 2001: 81-82. 2 Saunders and Southey, A dictionary of South African history: 22.
    [Show full text]
  • Frances Baard District Municipality
    FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY REVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK DRAFT July 2019 TITLE AND APPROVAL PAGE Frances Baard District Municipality Project Name: Reviewed Environmental Management Framework Authority Reference: N/A Report Status Draft Client: Prepared By: Nemai Consulting +27 11 781 1730 147 Bram Fischer Drive, +27 11 781 1731 FERNDALE, 2194 [email protected] PO Box 1673, SUNNINGHILL, www.nemai.co.za 2157 Report Reference: 10692–20190717 R-PRO-REP|20150514 Authorisation Name Date Author: D. Henning 17 July 2019 Reviewed By: N. Naidoo 17 July 2019 This Document is Confidential Intellectual Property of Nemai Consulting C.C. © copyright and all other rights reserved by Nemai Consulting C.C. This document may only be used for its intended purpose Frances Baard District Municipality Reviewed EMF (Draft) AMENDMENTS PAGE Amendment Date: Nature of Amendment Number: 17/07/2019 First Version for Public Review 0 Frances Baard District Municipality Reviewed EMF (Draft) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. INTRODUCTION An Environmental Management Framework includes a framework of spatially represented information connected to significant environmental (i.e. ecological, social and economic) parameters. It is one of the key instruments used in strategic environmental planning. In its formal context, the Environmental Management Framework that is adopted by the Minister or Member of the Executive Council will be taken into consideration when reviewing an application for environmental authorisation following the completion of an Environmental Impact Assessment, where the proposed development is contemplated within the areas to which the EMF applies The Frances Baard District Municipality identified the need to review its Environmental Management Framework that was developed in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Ruralhealthstrat Draft020306.Doc
    EXPLORING THE USE OF MINERAL CORRIDORS AND STRANDED ORE DEPOSITS IN ORDER TO ALLEVIATE RURAL POVERTY AND EFFECT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CHANGE THROUGH A PROPOSED RURAL DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR IN SOUTH AFRICA. by Joan Charlaine Baartjes A dissertation submitted to the Department of Geology, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science Supervisor: Professor Baojin Zhao 2011 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To all who shaped my thoughts, hopes and dreams, I salute you. Over the years, many people contributed ideas, comments and inputs that culminated in the content of this thesis. Without denying the value of these inputs, the following specific people and organisations are thanked for their roles: To God, you are first in all of me, may this small work also glorify You. May the seeds you sow sprout and multiply a hundred fold. To my loving and supportive husband, without whom this thesis would not have been realised. To my mother and mother-in-law, the prayer warriors that kept us sane, the family functioning and the love flowing. To my children Je-Mé and Viam, ensuring humility and pride in good balance. To my supervisor, Professor Zhao, your guidance and assistance made this doable. To the staff of EcoPartners, your commitment to our company is exemplary, thank you for your support. To the professional editor: Melody Andrews, thank you for all your effort. To all my clients, thank you for your understanding and encouragement. ii DECLARATION This dissertation is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Geology in the Faculty of Science and Agriculture at the University of Fort Hare.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Killer Unchecked in S.African Toxic Towns 9 August 2012, by Justine Gerardy
    Blue killer unchecked in S.African toxic towns 9 August 2012, by Justine Gerardy Death knows the small town of Prieska all too well. asbestos exposure is killing up to 52 people a year in the Northern Cape, while nearly 90 percent of 36 communities he surveyed had one or more sites A poisonous legacy of South Africa's years as a ranked as severe risk. global blue asbestos hub, the Grim Reaper has snaked through here for decades, wiping out "This is really a national environmental emergency families and striking down neighbours with deadly that should be dealt with. It is analogous to Libby, precision. Montana in the US and Wittenoom, Australia," said Jones, who has studied contamination levels for the "In most of the houses in our street, there is state. someone who has died of asbestosis or mesothelioma," said Chris Julius, 58, who was Wittenoom was shut down by Australian authorities diagnosed with asbestos cancer three months after in 1966 and Libby has received millions of dollars his mother-in-law passed away next door. for rehabilitation. A former teacher, Julius never worked at the Yet, while South Africa once produced 98 percent town's mill or in the nearby hills where mining of the world's blue asbestos, the government has started in the late 1800s along rich deposits known yet to act with the same urgency for its dozens of as the country's "asbestos mountains" that run toxic communities. along the vast Northern Cape. The older generation in Prieska tells of playing But he has mesothelioma, an aggressive lung obliviously on soft dumps as children, with no cancer whose diagnosis is a death sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of South African Place Names
    DICTIONARY OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN PLACE NAMES P E Raper Head, Onomastic Research Centre, HSRC CONTENTS Preface Abbreviations ix Introduction 1. Standardization of place names 1.1 Background 1.2 International standardization 1.3 National standardization 1.3.1 The National Place Names Committee 1.3.2 Principles and guidelines 1.3.2.1 General suggestions 1.3.2.2 Spelling and form A Afrikaans place names B Dutch place names C English place names D Dual forms E Khoekhoen place names F Place names from African languages 2. Structure of place names 3. Meanings of place names 3.1 Conceptual, descriptive or lexical meaning 3.2 Grammatical meaning 3.3 Connotative or pragmatic meaning 4. Reference of place names 5. Syntax of place names Dictionary Place Names Bibliography PREFACE Onomastics, or the study of names, has of late been enjoying a greater measure of attention all over the world. Nearly fifty years ago the International Committee of Onomastic Sciences (ICOS) came into being. This body has held fifteen triennial international congresses to date, the most recent being in Leipzig in 1984. With its headquarters in Louvain, Belgium, it publishes a bibliographical and information periodical, Onoma, an indispensable aid to researchers. Since 1967 the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names (UNGEGN) has provided for co-ordination and liaison between countries to further the standardization of geographical names. To date eleven working sessions and four international conferences have been held. In most countries of the world there are institutes and centres for onomastic research, official bodies for the national standardization of place names, and names societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Redefining the Griqualand West Centre of Endemism
    Redefining the Griqualand West Centre of Endemism AW Frisby 25474014 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae in Botany at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University Supervisor: Prof SJ Siebert Co-supervisor: Mr DP Cilliers May 2016 DECLARATION I declare that the work presented in this Masters dissertation is my own work, that it has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university, and that all the sources I have used or quoted have been acknowledged by complete reference. Signature of the Student:………………………………………………………… Signature of the Supervisor:………………………………………………………. ii ABSTRACT The Griqualand West Centre (GWC) of plant endemism in the Northern Cape was defined and described in 2001 according to geological features and limited floristic data. Approximately 40 plant species were proposed to be endemic to the GWC in an area larger than Lesotho and similar in size to provinces such as KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga. As these political areas each contain one or more centres of endemism with hundreds of endemics, the existence of a GWC could be questioned considering its large size and few endemics. To test for the presence of the GWC, data regarding the plant species present in the region and their distributions were sourced from the Plants of Southern Africa database, literature surveys and herbaria with specimens collected from the region. After mapping the species distributions, 24 plant species were found to be restricted to the Griqualand West region. The disjunct distributions of two near-endemic taxa indicated a link between the GWC and two other centres of plant endemism, namely Gariep and Sekhukhuneland.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] 1–408–923–6800
    www.minresco.com [email protected] 1–408–923–6800 Systematic Mineral List ABERNATHYITE - Rivieral, Lodeve, Herault Dept., France ABHURITE - Wreck of SS Cheerful, 14 Miles NNW of St. Ives, Cornwall, England ACANTHITE – Alberoda, Erzgebirge, Saxony, Germany ACANTHITE – Brahmaputra Vein, Alberoda, Schlema-Hartenstein District, Erzgebirge, Saxony, Germany ACANTHITE – Centennial Eureka Mine, Tintic District, Juab County, Utah ACANTHITE – Horn Silver Mine, near Frisco, Beaver County, Utah ACANTHITE – Ingleterra Mine, Santa Eulalia, Chihuahua, Mexico ACANTHITE – Pribram-Trebsco, Central Bohemia, Czech Republic ACANTHITE – Tombstone, Cochise County, Arizona ACHTARAGDITE - Achtaragda River/Wilui River District, Sakha Republic (Yakutia), Russian Fed. ADAMITE Var. Cuproadamite – Kintore Opencut, Broken Hill, New South Wales, Australia ADAMITE Var. Cuproadamite - Mine de Cap-Garonne, near Hyers, Dept. Var, France ADAMITE Var. Cuproadamite - Tsumcorp Mine, Tsumeb, Namibia ADAMITE Var. Cuproadamite – Zinc Hill, Darwin, Inyo County, California ADAMITE Var. Manganoan Adamite – El Potosi Mine, Santa Eulalia, Chihuahua, Mexico ADREALITE – Moorba Cave, Jurien Bay, W.A., Australia AEGIRINE Var. Blanfordite - Tirodi Mines, Madhya Pradesh, Central Provinces, India T AENIGMATITE – Chibiny (Khibina) Massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia AERINITE - Estopinan, Pyrenees Mountains, Huesca Province, Spain AESCHYNITE-(Y) (Priorite) – Arendal, Aust-Adger, Norway AFGHANITE – Casa Collina, Pitigliano, Grosseto, Tuscany (Toscana), Italy AFGHANITE - Laacher See Region, Ettringen,
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Moffat One of God's Gardeners
    ROBERT M O FFAT AT VORTY-THJm i-: ROBERT MOFFAT ONE OF GOD'S GARDENERS By EDWIN W. SMITH LITERARY SU~BRINTENDBNT OP' THE lJ:RITISH AND FOREIGN IlIBLE SOCIETY CHIEF TRANSLATOR OF THrt ILA NB\\' TF.STAMENT AUTHOR OF A Hat<d6011k ef tlu Ila Lang11age Tlte Rtligim ef LMuu• Races, ttc, co~AUTHOR OP' Tire lla.Spealdng Peoples o/ Nortlurn Rfrodesia And there you 'JI see lhe gardeners, the men and 'prt!ntice boys Told off to do as they arc bid and <lo it without noise: For, except when seeds are planted .anrl we shout to scare the bird:s, The Glory of the Garden it abidetb not in words. RUDYARD KIPLING LONDON CHURCH MISSIONARY SOCIETY SALISBURY SQUARE, E.C.4 1923 First f11b/isked April 19115 i.'Wadt and Printtd in &'reat Britain l>;- T>"rnb1fll &> Sp1an, Edi,.6u.-1'1· EDITORIAL NOTE THIS volume is the fifth of a uniform series of new missionary biographies, in the production of which a group of unusually able writers are collaborating. The series makes no pretence of adding new facts to those already known. The aim rather is to give to the world of to-day a fresh interpretation and a richer understanding of the life and work of great missionaries. The enterprise is being undertaken by the United Council for Missionary Education, for whom the series is published by the Student Christian Movement. K. M. A. E. C. U.C.M.E. 2 EATON GA.TB S.W.l TO NAMUSA, MY WIFE ANOTHER GARDENER AUTHOR'S PREFACE MY object throughout this volume has been to place Moffat in the historical and ethnological setting of South Africa-a country that has changed so much during the last hundred years that it is difficult for the present generation to realize the conditions under which he worked.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleural Mesothelioma And· Asbestos Exposure in the North Western Cape Province by J, C
    Bri~. J. industr. Med.,.1960, 17,.260. ; i i DIFFUSE· PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA AND· ASBESTOS EXPOSURE IN THE NORTH WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE BY J, C. fwAGNER, c. AYSLEGGS, and PAUL [MARCHANµ From the Pathology Division, Pneumoconiosis Research Unit of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Johannesburg, West End Hospital, Kimberley, and the . Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand and Joha1111esburg Geneml Hospital • (RECEIVED FOR PUBLICATION APRIL 24, ]960) Primary malignant. tumours of the pleura are uncommon. Thirty-three cases (22 males, 11 females, ages 31 to 68) ,of diffuse pleural mesothelioma are described; all but one have a probable exposure to crocidolite asbestos (Cape blue). In a majority this exposure was in the Asbestos Hills which lie to the west of Kimberley in the north west of Cape Province. The tumour is rarely seen elsewhere in South Africa. Mesoihelioma of the pieura is regarded as an the lungs of the first case (Case 1), and secondly, uncommon tumour. In the last four years we have 10 of the cases came from a hospital to which seen 33 histologically proven cases; 28 of these had suspected· cases of tuberculosis were referred fro:p1 a some association with the Cape asbestos field and large asbesto/l mining area. This hypothesis could four cases had been exposed to asbestos in industry. not be supported at once from the original histories The tumour is rarely encountered elsewhere in obtained from the patients, for they included house­ South Africa. During the past five years, with the wives, domestic servants, cattle herders, farmers~ a exception of the present series, no neoplasm of this water bailiff, an insurance agent, and an accountant, nature has been diagnosed amongst 10,000 lungs none of whom were working on the asbesto.s mines examined at the Pneumoconiosis Bureau in , at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTATIONS and TERMS Absolute Dating: Absolute Dating Provides Specific Dates Or Range of Dates Expressed in Years
    DANFIR (PTY) LTD: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER PLANT DEVELOPMENT ON PORTION 2 OF THE FARM VLAKPAN 59, HOPETOWN, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Archaeological Impact Assessment Prepared for: Danfir (Pty) Ltd Document version 2.0 (Final) Compiled by N. Kruger November 2014 Danfir: Vlakpan Solar Park Project Archaeological Impact Assessment Report Prepared by Danfir: Vlakpan Solar Park Project Archaeological Impact Assessment Report ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (AIA) OF A DEMARCATED SURFACE PORTION ON THE FARM VLAKPAN 59 FOR THE PROPOSED VLAKPAN PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER PLANT DEVELOPMENT, SIYANCUMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, PIXLEY KA SEME DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE November 2014 Document Version 1 (Draft): May 2014 Document Version 2 (Final): November 2014 Conducted on behalf of: Danfir (Pty) Ltd AGES Gauteng Compiled by: Nelius Kruger (BA, BA Hons. Archaeology Pret.) Reviewed by: Engela Grobler GAUTENG PROVINCE: The Village Office Park (Block E),309 Glenwood Road, Pretoria 0081, Postnet no 74, Private Bag X07, Arcadia, 0007 Tel: +27-12 751 2160 Fax: +27 (0) 86 607 2406 www.ages-group.com Offices: Eastern Cape Gauteng Limpopo Province Namibia North-West Province Western Cape Zimbabwe AGES Board of Directors: SJ Pretorius JA Myburgh JJP Vivier JH Botha H Pretorius THG Ngoepe SM Haasbroek R Crosby JC Vivier FN de Jager CJH Smit AS Potgieter AGES Gauteng Directors: JJP Vivier JC Vivier E van Zyl M Grobler Danfir: Vlakpan Solar Park Project Archaeological Impact Assessment Report Although Africa Geo-Environmental Services Gauteng (Pty) Ltd exercises
    [Show full text]
  • Vaal Gamagara Regional Water Supply Scheme Phase 2: Upgrading of Project Name: the Existing Scheme
    VAAL GAMAGARA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY SCHEME PHASE 2: UPGRADING OF THE EXISTING SCHEME ASIC SSESSMENT EPORT B A R NOVEMBER 2019 DRAFT DEFF REFERENCE: 14/12/16/3/3/1/2062 PREPARED FOR: SEDIBENG WATER Title and Approval Page Vaal Gamagara Regional Water Supply Scheme Phase 2: Upgrading of Project Name: the Existing Scheme Report Title: Basic Assessment Report Authority Reference: 14/12/16/3/3/1/2062 Report Status: Draft Applicant: Sedibeng Water Prepared By: Nemai Consulting +27 11 781 1730 147 Bram Fischer Drive, +27 11 781 1731 FERNDALE, 2194 [email protected] PO Box 1673, SUNNINGHILL, www.nemai.co.za 2157 Report Reference: 10689-VGRWSS-II: Upgrade BAR R-PRO-REP|20170216 Name Date Authors: D. Henning & C. van der Hoven 29/11/2019 Reviewed By: N. Naidoo 29/11/2019 This Document is Confidential Intellectual Property of Nemai Consulting C.C. © copyright and all other rights reserved by Nemai Consulting C.C. This document may only be used for its intended purpose VGRWSS-II: Upgrade of Existing Scheme Basic Assessment Report (Draft) Amendments Page Amendment Date: Nature of Amendment Number: 27/08/2019 Draft BAR for Public and Authority Review 0 05/12/2019 Draft BAR for Second Public and Authority Review 1 VGRWSS-II: Upgrade of Existing Scheme Basic Assessment Report (Draft) Executive Summary A. INTRODUCTION The Vaal Gamagara Regional Water Supply Scheme (VGRWSS) is a water supply scheme located in the Northern Cape Province that was completed in 1968 by the Department of Water Affairs, now Department of Human Settlements, Water and Sanitation (DHSWS), and transferred to Sedibeng Water in 2008.
    [Show full text]