DOCSLIB.ORG

Parallel Courts in Post-Conflict Kosovo T Elena A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parallel Courts in Post-Conflict Kosovo T Elena A Article Parallel Courts in Post-Conflict Kosovo t Elena A. Baylis 1. IN TR OD UCT ION ................................................................................................................................ I 11. THE PARALLEL COURTS ............................................................... 9 A . PoliticalH istory .................................................................... ....................... 9 B. Source of the Parallel Courts ........................................................................................ 10 C. Development of the Parallel Systems ........................................................................... 12 D. The Parallel Systems' Current Role ............................................................................. 14 1. In C ivil Cases .................................................................................................... 14 2. In C rim inal Cases ............................................................................................. 18 3. Political Significance ........................................................................................ 19 III. C IV IL JUDG M ENT S .......................................................................................................................... 2 1 A . Tw o Civil Cases ................................................................................................................ 25 B. Bypassing Sovereignty as the Basis for Jurisdiction .................................................... 26 C. Framework for Recognition: A Default Rule and Exceptions ..................................... 30 D. Grounds and Procedures for Non-Recognition ........................................................... 32 1. Contrast between E. U. & U.S. Foreign Judgment Models .............................. 35 2. Contrast between Arbitration Award and Out of Court Settlement Models ......... 37 E. A Civil Judgm ent M odel ................................................................................................ 38 F. An Exception for Property .......................................................................................... 40 IV . C RIM INAL JUDG M ENTS .................................................................................................................. 4 1 A . Two Crim inal Cases ...................................................................................................... 43 B. International Human Rights Norms ............................................................................. 45 C. Frameworks for Recognition and Non-Recognition .................................................... 48 1. Sovereignty ............................................................................................................ 49 2. Default Rules and Grounds for Non-Recognition ............................................ 49 3. A Criminal Judgment Model: Case by Case Assessments ................................ 53 V . C O N C LU SIO N .................................................................................................................................. 5 5 I. INTRODUCTION In Kosovo' today, two parallel judicial systems each claim absolute and exclusive jurisdiction over the province. One system is sponsored by the t Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh School of Law. Thanks to the Center for International Legal Education at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and the University of Pittsburgh's Russian and East European Studies Center for funding my trips to Kosovo, and to Mark Walter and James Stockstill for facilitating my research there. I am grateful to Judge Kaplan Baruti, Daniel Deja, Enver Fezjullahu, Dara Katz, Francesca Marzatico, Lyubomir Pantovic, Knut Rosenhaug, Michael Scheutz, Alice Thomas, and Adem Vokshi for discussing these issues with me in Kosovo; to Dusan Jelic, Vegim Rugova, and Xhyli Selimi for interpreting for me; to Vjosa Osmani, Luljeta Plakolli, and Jeremy Seeman for their research; and to Paul Berman, Ron Brand, John Burkoff, Paul Dubinsky, Amanda Frost, Jamie Munro, John Parry, Matthias Reiman, Michael Scharf, Dinah Shelton, Linda Tashbook, Melissa Waters, Stephanie Zai, David Zaring, and the participants in the American Society of Comparative Law Workshop "Comparative Law in Progress," for their comments, advice, and encouragement. 1. Most place names in this Article are given in both Serbian and Albanian, as is the common practice within the United Nations and other international organizations operating in Kosovo. However, 2 THE YALE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW [Vol. 32: 1 United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo ("UNMIK"), the other by the government of Serbia ("Serbia"). The UNMIK courts are new creations, staffed mostly by Kosovo Albanians and a few members of the minority Serb population, but controlled primarily by the international UNMIK administration. 2 For the United Nations, these courts are the incarnation of its claim to have established rule of law under principles of non-discrimination and ethnic integration. For Serbia, they are illegitimate occupiers' courts, symbolizing the continued foreign domination of Serbian territory. The Serbian parallel courts3 are courts-in-exile, transplants of the official Kosovo courts that existed before the NATO bombing and the UNMIK administration. To Serbia, they represent the original and legitimate courts of Kosovo and are an expression of Serbia's continuing claim to sovereignty over the province. To the United Nations, they are an obstacle to the resolution of Kosovo's still uncertain political status, since its "Standards for Kosovo" require that "parallel structures have been dismantled ' 4 when UNMIK yields administration to a permanent government. Kosovo's parallel courts raise a classic question of post-conflict justice: How should a transitional government and its courts address the legacy of the past regime? 5 "In the public imagination, transitional justice is commonly linked with punishment and the trials of ancien regimes,', 6 yet Kosovo's parallel courts represent the under-recognized reality that this legacy is not just a matter of historical events, but rather, permeates the very structures of transitional societies, including the legal system itself.7 Shaped in settings of violence and repression, post-conflict legal systems like Kosovo's maintain core features of these settings even after the conflict itself has formally ended. The very existence of the dual systems in Kosovo is a product of the Serbian- Albanian conflict. In their opposing claims to sole jurisdiction and their corresponding stance of mutual non-recognition, the parallel courts replicate, because it would be cumbersome to refer to "Kosovo/Kosova" throughout the Article in light of the frequency with which I use the term, I will refer solely to "Kosovo" throughout, as is also common practice in the U.N. and other organizations. This choice is purely a pragmatic one and is not intended to have political or other implications. 2. S.C. Res. 1244, 5, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1244 (June 10, 1999); U.N. Mission in Kosovo, On the Appointment and Removal from Office of InternationalJudges and InternationalProsecutors, U.N. Doc. UNMIK/REG/2000/6 (Feb. 15, 2000), available at http://www.unmikonline.org/exam/ testdata/doc/5948d29e 06.pdf; U.N. Mission in Kosovo, On Assignment of International Judges/Prosecutors and/or Change of Venue, U.N. Doc. UNMIK/REG/2000/64 (Dec. 15, 2000), availableat http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/2000/reg64-O0.htm. 3. Although these sets of courts are in a structural sense parallel to each other, and could thus technically both be called "parallel courts," it is common practice in Kosovo to use this term only for the Serbian courts. The UNMIK courts, in contrast, are never referred to as such. Accordingly, in order to be as clear as possible about which courts I am referring to for readers within and without Kosovo, I refer throughout this Article to the "Serbian parallel courts" on the one hand, and to the "UNMIK courts" on the other. Like the other linguistic choices in this Article, this one is purely pragmatic and is not intended to have any political or other implications. 4. Press Release, U.N. Mission in Kosovo, Standards for Kosovo, U.N. Doc. UNMIK/PR/1078 (Dec. 10, 2003), available at http://www.unmikonline.org/press/2003/ pressr/pr1 078.pdf. 5. See generally RUTI TEITEL, TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE (2002). 6. Id. at 27. 7. M. Cherif Bassiouni, Introduction to POST-CONFLICT JUSTICE xv (M. Cherif Bassiouni ed., 2002). 2007] ParallelCourts and thus perpetuate, the divisions and disputes of the conflict that produced them, serving as a potential catalyst for ongoing divisions and violence. Indeed, the legacy of parallel courts in Kosovo hampers everyday decisions, as well as the pursuit of justice on a larger scale. For the people of Kosovo, these parallel systems create legal uncertainty and conflict on a basic, day-to-day level. Judgments from one system are not recognized by the other, nor do the two systems share court files, cadastral records of title to land, or records of births, deaths, marriages, or divorces. To ensure enforcement of a divorce, a land sale, or a civil judgment, a Kosovo resident must pursue her claims in both systems. This presents a confusing, costly, and complex proposition that gives rise to conflicting judgments and to speculation and arbitrage. Because neither system recognizes the other's judgments, criminal suspects may face trial in both
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contestation of Kosovo's Statehood from Within: EULEX Judges Adjudicating Privatization Matters Through 'Status Neutrality
    Review of Central and East European Law 45 (2020) 432-443 Contestation of Kosovo’s Statehood from Within: EULEX Judges Adjudicating Privatization Matters through ‘Status Neutrality’ Kushtrim Istrefi Assistant Professor of Human Rights Law and Public International Law, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Member of the Netherlands Institute of Human Rights and Utrecht Centre for Accountability and Liability Law, Utrecht, The Netherlands k.istrefi@uu.nl Abstract Kosovo’s statehood has been contested by foes as well as friends. Much is known about the former and less about the latter. This contribution explores the contestation of Kosovo’s independence by the judges of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (eulex) working on privatization matters before Kosovo courts. As put by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo (kcc), eulex judges working on privatization matters, “simply continued to ignore the existence of Kosovo as an independent State and its legislation emanating from its Assembly”. The kcc stated this after eulex judges working on privatization matters had refused to respect Kosovo laws and institutions subsequent to the 2008 Kosovo Declaration of Independence. This paper explores the judicial dialogue on Kosovo’s independence between eulex judges and the kcc and identifies the limitations and risks of the ‘status neutral’ policy applied by international organizations to collaborate with Kosovar institutions without prejudging its political status. This submission suggests that ‘status neutrality’ leads to either acceptance or contestation of Kosovo’s statehood and thus brings more uncertainty than clarity to Kosovo’s position in international relations. Keywords Kosovo – eulex – status-neutrality – contested statehood – international organizations © KUSHTRIM ISTREFI, 2020 | doi:10.1163/15730352-bja10036 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NCDownloaded 4.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition
    COMMUNITY RIGHTS ASSESSMENT REPORT FOURTH EDITION NOVEMBER, 2015 Cover photograph: OSCE/Šehida Miftari, March 2015 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe MISSION IN KOSOVO Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition November, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTER-COMMUNITY DIALOGUE ..................................................................................................... 6 Inter-ethnic dialogue and dealing with the past ................................................................................ 6 Education and dialogue ...................................................................................................................... 7 2. SECURITY AND JUSTICE SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 9 Security trends and responses ............................................................................................................ 9 Rule of Law ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Property rights and reduction of backlog ......................................................................................... 13 Access to Justice ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eudo Citizenship Observatory
    EUDO CITIZENSHIP OBSERVATORY COUNTRY REPORT: SERBIA Nenad Rava Revised and updated January 2013 http://eudo-citizenship.eu European University Institute, Florence Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies EUDO Citizenship Observatory Report on Serbia Nenad Rava Revised and updated January 2013 This report has been produced by the CITSEE project (The Europeanisation of Citizenship in the Successor States of the former Yugoslavia) in close cooperation with EUDO CITIZENSHIP. CITSEE is a project based at Edinburgh University Law School and funded by an Advanced Investigator Award for basic research made to Jo Shaw by the European Council. All CITSEE reports are available at http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/citsee EUDO Citizenship Observatory Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Country Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2013/9 Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy © Nenad Rava This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. Requests should be addressed to eudo-citizenship@eui.eu The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union Published in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Research for the EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Reports has been jointly supported, at various times, by the European Commission grant agreements JLS/2007/IP/CA/009 EUCITAC and HOME/2010/EIFX/CA/1774 ACIT and by the British Academy Research Project CITMODES (both projects co-directed by the EUI and the University of Edinburgh).
    [Show full text]
  • “Everything Is Politicized”
    2010 “Everyth ing is politicized” Competing governments in Strpce/Shtërpcë, Kosovo Abstract: The aim of the research is to gain insight into the practices of parallelism and the influence of framing on this governance system. I obtained this information by taking one municipality, Strpce/Shtërpcë, as a case study. While living there for three months, I analyzed the everyday reality of life for citizens and the local governments. Strpce/Sthërpcë, a municipality in Kosovo of which the population consists of a Serbian majority, has two parallel sets of government related institutions. The governments compete and both claim to be the only legitimate ruler in the municipality. Both base their legitimacy on the claim that the territory is indivisible. Peaceful development in parallelism in Strpce/Shtërpcë will only be achieved when the framing of the situation changes. Significant herein is the inclusion of the youth. By looking into the practices of Strcpe/Shtërpcë I found signs of the dynamics of framing and possibly the weakening of the ‘indivisibility frame’. However regarding subjects that have to do with culture, history or language the indivisibility frame is still strong. Merel Heijke University of Wageningen 1-11-2010 “Everything is politicized” Competing Governments in Strpce/Shtërpcë, Kosovo Merel Heijke MSc ‘International Development Studies’ University of Wageningen 1 November 2010 2 Colofon © 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form of by any means, without the prior consent of the authors. This thesis is produced by Merel Heijke, student of Wageningen University in the Netherlands, as part of her MSc-programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforms and Governance Within the Higher Education System of Kosovo
    Reforms and Governance within the Higher Education System of Kosovo By Granit Jakupi Submitted to Central European University Department of Economics In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Economic Policy in Global Markets Supervisor: Professor Lajos Bokros CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2013 i ABSTRACT A number of studies worldwide, for several decades, have placed considerable importance on higher education when analyzing the potential that this system has in improving the economic development and mitigating the poverty among developing countries. This thesis investigates how the higher education system is affecting the unemployment level among educated workforce. It has been structured using a descriptive study design by mapping out the issues and providing solutions from the perspective of policy makers responsible for the higher education system. The theoretical framework has been derived based on institutional theories of higher education and literature on human capital. The core findings from this study resulted from extensive field research and analysis of statistics. The results suggest that the higher education system in Kosovo is poorly structured and it is identified as the main contributor to the unemployment level among educated workforce. Additionally, those findings suggest that the root, risks, and response is located to central institutions and it is in their hands to tackle the issue of jobless graduates within the country of Kosovo. Finally, the policy recommendations are formed following the data suggestions and they represent joint efforts of higher education institutions to undertake policy reforms in restructuring and improving the system. CEU eTD Collection ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude for Professor Lajos Bokros, for his enthusiastic encouragement, patient guidance, and valuable critiques through this thesis work as well as my studies at the Central European University.
    [Show full text]
  • Allocation of Public Expenditures in the Post-War Kosovo: a Critical Analysis
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses 7-2020 Allocation of Public Expenditures in the post-war Kosovo: A critical analysis Leonita Krasniqi lxk6114@rit.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Krasniqi, Leonita, "Allocation of Public Expenditures in the post-war Kosovo: A critical analysis" (2020). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Senior Project is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact ritscholarworks@rit.edu. Allocation of Public Expenditures in the post-war Kosovo: A critical analysis An Honors Society Project Leonita Krasniqi Advisor: Venera Demukaj, PhD Second reader: Besnik Bislimi, PhD July 2020 ALLOCATION OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES IN KOSOVO Abstract How public expenditures are allocated can have profound effects on the macro-fiscal environment of a country. This research project analyzes how the Government of Kosovo allocates its public expenditures. Two particular strategic documents are examined—the Economic Vision 2011-2014 and the National Development Strategy 2016-2021. It does so by analyzing whether or not the priorities set in these strategies are translated in Medium-Term Expenditure Frameworks and the Budget Laws. Finally, this research project examines how the allocated public expenditures are realized. The research concludes that despite the well- established written strategies, a wide gap exists between the priorities set and their actual execution. 1 ALLOCATION OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES IN KOSOVO Acknowledgments To the professors who have encouraged me to follow the path of economics.
    [Show full text]
  • S/2019/797 Security Council
    United Nations S/2019/797 Security Council Distr.: General 4 October 2019 Original: English United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo Report of the Secretary-General I. Introduction and Mission priorities 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1244 (1999), by which the Council established the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) and requested me to report at regular intervals on the implementation of its mandate. The report covers the activities of UNMIK, and developments related thereto, from 16 May to 15 September 2019. 2. The priorities of the Mission remain to promote security, stability and respect for human rights in Kosovo and in the region. In furtherance of its goals, UNMIK continues its constructive engagement with Pristina and Belgrade, all communities in Kosovo and regional and international actors. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Kosovo Force continue to perform their roles within the framework of Security Council resolution 1244 (1999). The European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX) continues its presence in Kosovo, in line with the statement by the President of the Security Council of 26 November 2008 (S/PRST/2008/44) and my report of 24 November 2008 (S/2008/692). The United Nations agencies, funds and programmes work closely with the Mission. II. Key political and security developments 3. The reporting period was marked by the resignation of the Prime Minister of Kosovo, Ramush Haradinaj, on 19 July. The Prime Minister cited as a major reason his invitation to be interviewed by the Specialist Chambers and the Specialist Prosecutor’s Office, and clarified that he would continue to perform his functions pending the formation of a new government.
    [Show full text]
  • Coercive Diplomacy of NATO in Kosovo
    Coercive Diplomacy of NATO in Kosovo Coercive Diplomacy of NATO in Kosovo By Enver Bytyçi Coercive Diplomacy of NATO in Kosovo By Enver Bytyçi Editor: Dr. Arian Starova Reviewers: Prof. Dr. Beqir Meta - Academic Prof. Dr. Jusuf Bajraktari – Academic Prof. Dr. Muharrem Dezhgiu – Historian Prof. Dr. Hamit Kaba – Historian Proof reader: Lloyd Barton Translated from Albanian into English: Iris Gjymshana This book first published 2015 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2015 by Enver Bytyçi All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-7272-5 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-7272-0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter I ...................................................................................................... 3 Kosovo Crisis: A Historical Overview 1. The roots of the Serbian-Albanian conflict 2. Kosovo after Albania’s declaration of independence 3. Exploiting freedom in autonomy 4. Removal of autonomy in 1989 5. Construction and operation of self-governing institutions Chapter II ................................................................................................... 33 International Law and the Legitimacy of NATO Intervention in Kosovo 1. The historical development of international law 2. The development of human rights 3. The right to self-determination and the right to state sovereignty Chapter III ................................................................................................. 71 NATO and the Diplomacy to Avoid War 1. Military intervention as part of conflict prevention 2.
    [Show full text]
  • [ 2007 ] Part 1 Chapter 5 Europe and the Mediterranean
    Chapter V Europe and the Mediterranean The restoration of peace and stability in the post- (Moscow Agreement), and Georgia demanded the conflict countries in the European and Mediter- withdrawal of Russian peacekeeping forces from the ranean region advanced in 2007, as efforts to re- conflict zone. Compliance with the Moscow Agree- establish their institutions and social and economic ment and with Security Council resolutions 858(1993) infrastructure continued. However, a number of and 937(1994) was monitored by the United Nations issues remained unresolved. Observer Mission in Georgia (unomig) and by a col- Led by the European Union (eu), the international lective peacekeeping force of the Commonwealth of community continued to assist Bosnia and Herze- Independent States. govina to move towards full integration into Europe No progress was made towards settling the conflict through the eu Stabilization and Association Process. between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina signed a security agreement Nagorno-Karabakh region in Azerbaijan. In July, with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (nato), Nagorno-Karabakh held presidential elections, the but the country was not successful in securing a Sta- results of which were rejected by Azerbaijan, several bilization and Association Agreement with the eu. neighbouring States, the eu, the Organization of the In Kosovo (Serbia), the United Nations Interim Islamic Conference and the Organization for Security Administration Mission in Kosovo (unmik) contin- and Cooperation in Europe, and its status remained ued to assist in the building of a modern, multi- uncertain at year’s end. ethnic society. In March, the Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for the future status of Kosovo pre- Similarly, no progress was made towards settling sented the Secretary-General with his proposal on the conflict with regard to the Transnistrian region Kosovo’s future status.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kosovo Report
    THE KOSOVO REPORT CONFLICT v INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE v LESSONS LEARNED v THE INDEPENDENT INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON KOSOVO 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford Executive Summary • 1 It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, Address by former President Nelson Mandela • 14 and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Map of Kosovo • 18 Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogotá Buenos Aires Calcutta Introduction • 19 Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris São Paulo Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw PART I: WHAT HAPPENED? with associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Preface • 29 Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the uk and in certain other countries 1. The Origins of the Kosovo Crisis • 33 Published in the United States 2. Internal Armed Conflict: February 1998–March 1999 •67 by Oxford University Press Inc., New York 3. International War Supervenes: March 1999–June 1999 • 85 © Oxford University Press 2000 4. Kosovo under United Nations Rule • 99 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) PART II: ANALYSIS First published 2000 5. The Diplomatic Dimension • 131 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, 6. International Law and Humanitarian Intervention • 163 without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, 7. Humanitarian Organizations and the Role of Media • 201 or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Anti-Discrimination Legislation in the Western Balkans
    Warsaw, 28 March 2014 Opinion-Nr..: NDISCR -BPRI/229/2013 [MWrz/AT] www.legislationline.org OVERVIEW OF ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LEGISLATION IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Ul. Miodowa 10 PL-00-251 Warsaw OSCE/ODIHR Overview of Anti-Discrimination Legislation in the Western Balkans TABLE OF CONTENTS I. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS II. INTRODUCTION III. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. International Definitions and Standards Related to Anti-Discrimination Legislation 2. Protected Characteristics 2.1. Discrimination Based on Assumed Characteristics or Based on Association 3. Personal Scope 4. Material Scope 5. Key Definitions and Concepts 5.1. Direct Discrimination 5.2. Indirect Discrimination 5.3. Harassment 5.4. Instruction to Discriminate 5.5. Victimization 5.6. Reasonable Accommodation 5.7. Segregation 6. Exceptions from the Prohibition of Discrimination 6.1. Genuine and Determining Occupational Requirement 6.2. Religious Ethos 6.3. Other Exceptions 7. Equality Bodies 8. Remedies and Sanctions 8.1. Judicial Procedures 8.2. Third-Party Intervention 8.3. Burden of Proof Annex 1: Table of Anti-Discrimination Laws (Western Balkans) (Annex 1 constitutes a separate document) 2 OSCE/ODIHR Overview of Anti-Discrimination Legislation in the Western Balkans LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BiH – Bosnia and Herzegovina BPRI - Best Practices for Roma Integration CERD - UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination CRPD - UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ECHR - European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR - European Court of Human Rights
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    EASTeWEST MANAGEMENT FROM -THE AMERiCAN PEOPLE INSTITUTE FINAL REPORT KOSOVO NGO ADVOCACY PROJECT Cooperative Agreement No. 167-A-00-01-00108-00 September 2001 through May 2005 Submitted to: U. S. Agency for International Development Submitted by: East -West Management Institute, Inc. August 2005 .LWARC Albanian National Training, Technical Assistance and Resourn Center .L\fPPKO Association of hlik Producers and Proeffsors of Korovo ATRC Advocacy Training and Resource Center AVOKO Iiosovo Adroeaey NGOs Setwork BCIF Balkan Community Initiative Fund BTD Balkan Trust for Democracy CEE Central and Eastern Europe CFA Call for Applications CIDh Canadian International Development Agency E\nn East-Wesl hlanagement Institute. Inc. EFC European Foundation Center EU European Union FDI Foundation for Democratic Initiatives FOIL Freedom of Information Law GMP Generally Accepted Acmunting Principles GTZ German Agency for Technical Cooperation IAS International Accounting Standards ICNL International Center for Not-for-profit Law Irn International Criminal Tribunal for ex-Yugoslavia IDEA International Institute for Democracy and Electoral .\ssistaoce IKDO Kosovar Institute for SGO Law IRC International Rescue Committee KFOS Kosovo Foundation for an Open Society KNAP Kwovo NGO Advocacy Project KTA Kosovo Transition Authority KOhT Kacovo Organization for Sew Initiatives KT1 Kosovo Transition Initiatives n\-I Kosovo \Yomen's Initiative sms htillenium Development Goals NAAC National Albanian .%merican Council NGO Non-governmental organization OCG Office
    [Show full text]