Abstract Harris, Nyeema Charmaine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
EC) No 338/97 on the Protection of Species of Wild Fauna and Flora by Regulating Trade Therein
12.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 212/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 709/2010 of 22 July 2010 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, (7) The species Ctenosaura bakeri, C. oedirhina, C. melanosterna, C. palearis, Agalychnis spp., Dynastes satanas, Operculicarya hyphaenoides, O. pachypus, Zygosicyos pubescens, Z. Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European tripartitus, Aniba rosaeodora (with annotation), Adenia Union, olaboensis, Cyphostemma elephantopus, C. montagnacii and Bulnesia sarmientoi (with annotation) have been included in Appendix II. Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna 1 and flora by regulating trade therein ( ), and in particular (8) The Appendix II listing of Beccariophoenix madagascariensis Article 19(5) thereof, and Neodypsis decaryi was extended to include seeds from Madagascar. Whereas: (9) The following species have been deleted from Appendix III to the Convention at the request of Malaysia: Arbo (1) Regulation (EC) No 338/97 lists animal and plant species rophila campbelli, Arborophila charltonii, Caloperdix oculeus, in respect of which trade is restricted or controlled. Lophura erythrophthalma, Lophura ignita, Melanoperdix niger, Those lists incorporate the lists set out in the Appendices Polyplectron inopinatum, Rhizothera dulitensis, Rhizothera to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered longirostris and Rollulus rouloul, and the species Haliotis Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, hereinafter ‘the midae has been deleted from Appendix III to the Convention’. -
KHS Newsletter, No. 50 December 1982
KANSAS HIRPITOLOGICAL SOCIETY KHS Newsletter, No. 50 December 1982 KHS MEMBERS NOTE 1983 KHS MEETING AND FIELD TRIP DATES Listed below are the meeting dates and locations for the 1983 KHS field trips and the lOth ANNIVERSARY MEETING. Please mark these on your calendar, and plan to attend as many as you can. More detailed information will appear in forthcoming KHS Newsletter issues. - 1. Field Trip. 29 April - 1 May. Toronto Reservoir, Woodson County. Host: John Fraser (316) 378-3138. 2. Field Trip. 27-29 May. Meade County State Lake. Host: Kelly J. Irwin (913) 864-3573 or (913) 864-5587. 3. Field Trip. 16-18 September. Bourbon County State Lake. Host: Larry Miller (316) 845-2680. 4. lOth Anniversary Annual Meeting. 12-13 November. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Lawrence. Host: Joseph T. Collins (913) 864-4920. 1982 FALL FIELD TRIP HELD IN BUTLER COUNTY, KANSAS The final field trip for the KHS during 1982 was held at the Butler County Fishing Lake located south of El Dorado, Kansas. There were about a dozen and a half members and friends at the meeting and campout. The group spent some time exploring the cave near El Dorado the morning of the 18th of September. A northern water snake, some cricket frogs, leopard frogs, and bullfrogs were found near and in the damp cave. Collecting was done in many areas of Butler and Cowley counties during the weekend. The amphibians and reptiles collected frotn each county include: BUTLER COUNTY Small-mouthed Salamander (Ambystoma texanum) Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris crepitans blanchardi) (continued next page) \ \ One of the youn·ger herpers from Emporia looks over some of the carvings on the cave walls during the trip to the cave during the fall KHS meeting in Butler County, Kansas. -
P. 1 AC18 Inf. 11 (English Only/ Seulement En Anglais
AC18 Inf. 11 (English only/ Seulement en anglais/ Únicamente en inglés) THE POTENTIAL TO BREED APPENDIX-I REPTILES IN CAPTIVITY A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT IUCN/SSC Crocodile Specialist Group Florida Museum of Natural History Gainesville FL 32611 USA Background and Purpose Article VII.4 of the Convention provides for specimens of Appendix I species that have been bred in captivity, or artificially propagated, to be deemed to be specimens of species included in Appendix-II for the purposes of exports for commercial purposes. Implementation of this provision of the Convention has required commercial captive breeding operations to be registered with the Secretariat. The registration process has entailed a complicated and sometimes lengthy process involving scrutiny of the application through correspondence by the Secretariat, relevant experts and the Parties. As a consequence, the extent to which Parties have adopted the registration procedure has been has been limited. Numerous Parties authorize exports of Captive-bred specimens of Appendix-I species in accordance with Article III, paragraph 3(a), of the Convention. Resolution Conf. 11.14 (Gigiri, 2000) establishes a new approach to the registration process in an effort to streamline and simplify the procedure. Pursuant to Resolution Conf. 11.14, the Parties have agreed to compile an annex comprising “a list of Appendix-I species that are critically endangered in the wild and/or difficult to keep or breed in captivity”. In the same Resolution, the Parties also agreed: “that determination of whether or not to apply the exemptions of Article VII, paragraph 4, for the export of specimens of Appendix-I animals bred in captivity for commercial purposes, where the species are not included in Annex 3 to the Resolution, remains the responsibility of the Management Authority of the exporting Party on the advice of the Scientific Authority that each operation complies with the provisions of Resolution Conf. -
990 PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES CONVENTION Subpart A—Introduction
Pt. 23 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–01 Edition) Service agent, or other game law en- 23.36 Schedule of public meetings and no- forcement officer free and unrestricted tices. access over the premises on which such 23.37 Federal agency consultation. operations have been or are being con- 23.38 Modifications of procedures and nego- ducted; and shall furnish promptly to tiating positions. such officer whatever information he 23.39 Notice of availability of official re- may require concerning such oper- port. ations. Subpart E—Scientific Authority Advice (c) The authority to take golden ea- [Reserved] gles under a depredations control order issued pursuant to this subpart D only Subpart F—Export of Certain Species authorizes the taking of golden eagles when necessary to seasonally protect 23.51 American ginseng (Panax domesticated flocks and herds, and all quinquefolius). such birds taken must be reported and 23.52 Bobcat (Lynx rufus). turned over to a local Bureau Agent. 23.53 River otter (Lontra canadensis). 23.54 Lynx (Lynx canadensis). 23.55 Gray wolf (Canis lupus). PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES 23.56 Brown bear (Ursus arctos). CONVENTION 23.57 American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Subpart A—Introduction AUTHORITY: Convention on International Sec. Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna 23.1 Purpose of regulations. and Flora, 27 U.S.T. 1087; and Endangered 23.2 Scope of regulations. Species Act of 1973, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 23.3 Definitions. 1531 et seq. 23.4 Parties to the Convention. SOURCE: 42 FR 10465, Feb. 22, 1977, unless Subpart B—Prohibitions, Permits and otherwise noted. -
Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, II R.G
In: Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, II R.G. Foottit & P.H. Adler, editors) John Wiley & Sons 2018 Chapter 17 Biodiversity of Ectoparasites: Lice (Phthiraptera) and Fleas (Siphonaptera) Terry D. Galloway Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch17 Summary This chapter addresses the two insect orders in which all known species are ectoparasites. The sucking and chewing lice (Phthiraptera) are hemimetabolous insects that spend their entire lives on the bodies of their hosts. Fleas (Siphonaptera), on the other hand, are holometabolous. The diversity of these ectoparasites is limited by the diversity of the birds and mammals available as hosts. Determining the community diversity of lice and fleas is essential to understanding ecological structure and interactions, yet offers a number of challenges to the ectoparasitologist. The chapter explores medical and veterinary importance of lice and fleas. They are more likely to be considered detrimental parasites, perhaps even a threat to conservation efforts by their very presence or by the disease agents they transmit. Perez-Osorio emphasized the importance of a more objective approach to conservation strategies by abandoning overemphasis on charismatic fauna and setting priorities in ecological management of wider biodiversity issues. When most people see a bird or mammal, they don’t look beneath the feathers or hair of that animal to see what is hidden. They see the animal at its face value, and seldom appreciate the diversity of life before them. The animal is typically a mobile menagerie, infested by external parasites and their body laden with internal parasites and pathogens. -
Keel-Scaled Boa, Casarea Dussumieri
Keel-scaled boa, Casarea dussumieri Photo by Johannes Chambon Compiler: Aurelie Hector Contributors: Nik Cole, Johannes Chambon, Luke A’Bear, Jamie Dunlop, Mala Currooah, Phil Lambdon, Beth Govier, Sarah West Suggested citation: Hector, A. (2018) Survival Blueprint for the conservation and management of Keel-scaled boa Casarea dussumieri in Mauritius. An output from the EDGE of Existence fellowship, Zoological Society of London. 1. STATUS REVIEW 1.1 Taxonomy: Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Reptilia Order Squamata Family: Bolyeriidae The keel-scaled boa Casarea dussumieri, also known as the Round Island boa and the split-jaw snake, is a nonvenomous constrictor. This species is the only living representative of the Bolyeriidae Family. Endemic to Mauritius, there is no subspecies. 1.2 Distribution and population status: The keel-scaled boa became restricted to Round Island (219 ha) during the mid-1800s due to the invasion of introduced mammalian predators, mainly rats Rattus norvegicus and R. rattus everywhere else in Mauritius (Cheke & Hume 2008). Based on sub- fossilised bone deposits and historical encounters the spe cies was once found on the mainland of Mauritius and other islets, including Gunner's Quoin (0.70 km2), Flat Island (2.53 km2) and Ile de la Passe (0.02 km2) (Arnold 1980, Cheke 1987, Cheke & Hume 2008). Seventy young healthy adult boas of equal sex-ratio were reintroduced to Gunner’s Quoin from Round Island between 2012 and 2014, where a population is now growing and dispersing across the island (Cole et al. 2013, Goder et al. 2015). The annual survival estimate calculated was 88.6% with 95% confidence intervals of 79.5% and 93.9% for the Boa on Round Island (Hector unpublished data 2017). -
The Available Name for the Taxonomic Group Uniting Boas and Pythons
70 (3): 291 – 304 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2020. 2020 Constrictores Oppel, 1811 – the available name for the taxonomic group uniting boas and pythons Georgios L. Georgalis 1, 2, * & Krister T. Smith 3, 4 1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso 35, Torino, 10125, Italy — 2 Department of Ecology, Labora- tory of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina, Bratislava, 84215, Slovakia — 3 Department of Messel Research and Mammalogy, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt am Main, 60325, Germany — 4 Faculty of Biological Sciences, Institute for Ecology, Diversity and Evolution, Max-von-Laue- Straße 13, University of Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany — * Corresponding author; [email protected] Submitted April 25, 2020. Accepted June 17, 2020. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/vertebrate-zoology on June 26, 2020. Published in print on Q3/2020. Editor in charge: Uwe Fritz Abstract Recent advances in the phylogenetic relationships of snakes using both molecular and morphological data have generally demonstrated a close relationship between boas and pythons but also induced nomenclatural changes that rob the least inclusive clade to which both belong of a name. This name would be tremendously useful, because it is the least inclusive group to which a large number of fossil boa-like or python-like taxa can be assigned. Accordingly, an update of higher-level nomenclature is desirable. We herein provide an overview of all the names that have historically been applied to boas and pythons. We show that the earliest name for the supra-familial group encompass- ing boas and pythons is Constrictores Oppel, 1811. -
Higher-Level Snake Phylogeny Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA Sequences of 12S Rrna and 16S Rrna Genes
Higher-Level Snake Phylogeny Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA Sequences of 12s rRNA and 16s rRNA Genes Philip J. Heise, * Linda R. Maxson, * ’ Herndon G. Dowling,? and S. Blair Hedges* *Department o f Biology and Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Pennsylvania State University; and t 18 11 Rendalia Motorway, Talladega, Alabama Portions of two mitochondrial genes ( 12s and 16s ribosomal RNA) were sequenced to determine the phylogenetic relationships among the major clades of snakes. Thirty-six species, representing nearly all extant families, were examined and compared with sequences of a tuatara and three families of lizards. Snakes were found to constitute a monophyletic group (confidence probability [CP] = 96%) with the scolecophidians (blind snakes) as the most basal lineages (CP = 99%). This finding supports the hypothesis that snakes underwent a subterranean period early in their evolution. Caenophidians (advanced snakes), excluding Acrochordus, were found to be monophyletic (CP = 99%). Among the caenophidians, viperids were monophyletic (CP = 98%) and formed the sister group to the elapids plus colubrids (CP = 94%). Within the viperids, two monophyletic groups were identified: true vipers (CP = 98%) and pit vipers plus Azemiops (CP = 99%). The elapids plus Atructaspis formed a monophyletic clade (CP = 99%). Within the paraphyletic Colubridae, the largely Holarctic Colubrinae was found to be a monophyletic assemblage (CP = 98%), and the Xenodontinae was found to be polyphyletic (CP = 9 1%). Monophyly of the henophidians (primitive snakes) was neither supported nor rejected because of the weak resolution of relationships among those taxa, except for the clustering of Culabaria with a uropeltid, Rhinophis (CP = 94%). Introduction Snakes arose from lizards approximately 125 blunt heads, smooth shiny scales, reduced eyes and pig- million years ago (Rage 1984; Carroll 1988, p. -
Host-Parasite Associations of the Cratogeomys Fumosus Species Group and Their Chewing Lice, Geomydoecus Alex Popinga, James W
www.mastozoologiamexicana.org La Portada Colonia reproductiva de lobos marino (Zalopus californicus) en la costa del Pacífico de la isla Margarita, Baja California Sur. Se observa como el macho del grupo vigila y se coloca entre los extraños al grupo y las hembras con crías (Fotografía Sergio Ticul Álvarez Castañeda). Nuestro logo “Ozomatli” El nombre de “Ozomatli” proviene del náhuatl se refiere al símbolo astrológico del mono en el calendario azteca, así como al dios de la danza y del fuego. Se relaciona con la alegría, la danza, el canto, las habilidades. Al signo decimoprimero en la cosmogonía mexica. “Ozomatli” es una representación pictórica de los mono arañas (Ateles geoffroyi). La especie de primate de más amplia distribución en México. “ Es habitante de los bosques, sobre todo de los que están por donde sale el sol en Anáhuac. Tiene el dorso pequeño, es barrigudo y su cola, que a veces se enrosca, es larga. Sus manos y sus pies parecen de hombre; también sus uñas. Los Ozomatin gritan y silban y hacen visajes a la gente. Arrojan piedras y palos. Su cara es casi como la de una persona, pero tienen mucho pelo.” THERYA Volumen 10, número 2 mayo 2019 EDITORIAL The holistic specimen and parasites of mammals Jesús A. Fernández. 65 ARTICLES Detection of Bartonella and Rickettsia in small mammals and their Contenido ectoparasites in México Sokani Sánchez-Montes, Martín Yair Cabrera-Garrido, César A. Ríos-Muñoz, Ali Zeltzin Lira-Olguin; Roxana Acosta-Gutiérrez, Mario Mata-Galindo, Kevin Hernández-Vilchis, D. Melissa Navarrete-Sotelo, Pablo Colunga-Salas, Livia León-Paniagua and Ingeborg Becker. -
MWF Annual Report 2019
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 24th March 2020 THE MAURITIAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION The Mauritian Wildlife Foundation (MWF) is a Registered Charity established in 1984. MWF works in close cooperation with the Government of Mauritius and the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, formalized in separate memorandums of understanding. The headquarters is located in Vacoas, Mauritius and the Rodrigues branch is based in Solitude. MWF is the only Mauritian NGO to be exclusively concerned with the conservation of terrestrial endemic species and their habitats, and in Rodrigues has a specialization in habitat restoration. The principal objective of the organization is to save threatened native and endemic species from extinction. Achievements MWF’s best known achievement is the saving of the Mauritian Kestrel. The MWF, has in recent years, brought the Pink Pigeon, the Echo Parakeet and the Mauritius Fody back from the brink of extinction. MWF's work in the area of captive-breeding and hands-on wild management of endemic animals is of internationally high repute. Our expertise is also being used in Rodrigues to address problems caused by degradation of habitat. Here we are propagating native plants in nurseries and planting them out to restore vegetation communities. The Foundation also works actively to restore offshore islands, by removing exotic vertebrates and plants and by restoring vegetation and vertebrate communities. The MWF is currently working on several islands including Ile aux Aigrettes, Round Island, Ile Cocos and Ile aux Sables. All of these are high profile projects of national and global biological significance. The MWF believes that the work it is doing benefits the Mauritian nation both for the present and future generations. -
Flea News 53
flea NEWS 53 Department of Entomology Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 <http://www.ent.iastate.edu/FleaNews/ AboutFleaNews.html> or through the Table of Contents internet via anonymous FTP: Book Reviews....................613-617 <ftp.ent.iastate.edu> in the "Publications" directory. Electronic Literature........................626-632 versions are available for No. 46, July, Miscellanea...........................617 1993; No. 47, December, 1993; No. 48, Obituaries........................618-626 July, 1994; No. 49, December, 1994; No. 50, June, 1995; No. 51, December, Report...................................632 1995; No. 52, June, 1996 and this number. The opinions and assertions con- FLEA NEWS is a biannual newsletter tained herein are the private ones of devoted to matters involving insects the authors and are not to be constru- belonging to the order Siphonaptera (fleas) and related subjects. It is com- ed as official or as reflecting the views piled and distributed free of charge by of the Department of Entomology, Robert E. Lewis ([email protected]) Iowa State University or Sandoz in cooperation with the Department of Animal Health. Entomology at Iowa State University, Ames, IA, and a grant in aid from ❊❆❊❆❊❆❊ Sandoz Animal Health, based in Des Plaines, IL. It is mainly bibliograph-ic in nature. Many of the sources are NOTICE abstracting journals and title pages Effective 1-January-1997 I will and not all citations have been check- have retired from the Iowa State ed for completeness or accuracy. Ad- University. I intend to remain active ditional information will be provided professionally and will continue to upon written or e-mail request. Fur- produce this newsletter as long as ther, recipients are urged to contri-bute there is support for it. -
An Annotated Catalog of Primary Types of Siphonaptera in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution
* An Annotated Catalog of Primary Types of Siphonaptera in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution NANCY E. ADAMS and ROBERT E. LEWIS I SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 560 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.