DOCSLIB.ORG

Checklist of Reptiles and Amphibians Listed in the CITES Appendices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Checklist of Reptiles and Amphibians Listed in the CITES Appendices JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE CheckUst of reptiles and amphibians listed in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT fSSN 0^3-8il)'»J Checklist of reptiles and amphibians hsted in the CITES appendices JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 237 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F71-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report title: Checklist of reptiles and amphibians listed in the CITES appendices Contract title: Revise Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further herpetological edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: None Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Small, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG XI/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFHC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No. 237 Checklist of reptiles and amphibians hsted in the CITES appendices compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre Prepared under contract from the Joint Nature Conservation Committee by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK. Established in 1988 as a company limited by guarantee with charitable status. WCMC is managed as a joint-venture between the three partners in the WorUi Conservation Strategy and its successor Caring For The Earth: lUCN - The World Conservation Union, UNEP - United Nations Environment Programme, and WWF - World Wide Fund for Nature. The Centre provides information services on the conservation and sustainable use of species and ecosystems and supports others in the development of their own information systems. Published by: Joint Nature Conservation Cortunittee Copyright: 1995 Joint Nature Conservation Committee ISBN: 1st edition published 1979 ISBN 0-86139-075-X 2nd edition published 1981 ISBN 0-86139-095^ 3rd edition published 1983 ISBN 0-86139-224-8 4th edition published 1988 ISBN 0-86139-465-8 5th edition published 1993 ISBN 1 -87370 M6-2 6th edition published 1995 ISSN 0963-8091 Citation: World Conservation Monitoring Centre (1995). Checklist of amphibians and reptiles listed in the CITES Appendices. Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No. 237. Further copies of this report are available from: David H.W. Morgan International Policy Branch Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Peterborough PEl IJY United Kingdom Tel: -1-44 1733 62626 Fax: -1-44 1733 555948 The designations of geographical entities in this report, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of JNCC or WCMC concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Contents Acknowledgements 1 ANURA 46 Introduction i Bufonidae 46 Explanatory notes ii Dendrobatidae 47 Introductory references V Microhylidae 52 Myobatrachidae 52 Ranidae 52 Taxonomic List REFERENCES 53 REPTILIA 1 TESTUDINES 1 INDEX 71 Dermatemydidae 1 Emydidae 1 Testudinidae 2 Cheloniidae 6 Dermochelyidae 8 Trionychidae 8 Pelomedusidae 9 Chelidae 10 CROCODYLIA 10 Alligatoridae 10 Crocodylidae 11 Gavialidae 13 RHYNCHOCEPHALIA 13 Sphenodontidae 13 SAURIA 13 Gekkonidae 13 Agamidae 16 Chamaeleonidae 17 Iguanidae 25 Lacertidae 26 Cordylidae 26 Teiidae 29 Scincidae 30 Xenosauridae 30 Helodermatidae 30 Varanidae 30 SERPENTES 34 Boidae 34 Colubridae 42 Elapidae 43 Viperidae 44 AMPHIBIA 46 CAUDATA 46 Ambystomatidae 46 Cryptobranchidae 46 Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2010 witii funding from UNEP-WCIVIC, Cambridge littp://www.arcliive.org/details/cliecklistofrepti95wcmc Acknowledgements Introduction This checklist was compiled by the World In April 1991, the Nature Conservancy Council Conservation Monitoring Centre under contract for England, Countryside Council for Wales and F71-12-332 from the Joint Nature Conservation Scottish Natural Heritage acting together through Committee. the Joint Nature Conservation Committee were appointed by the Secretary of State for the The document was compiled by Brian Environment as the United Kingdom's Scientific Groombridge and produced by Helen Corrigan Authority for Animals under the Convention on and Julie Reay. Mary Cordiner and Jessica Pullen International Trade in Endangered Species of provided other assistance. Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). CITES regulates international trade in wild animals and plants and We are grateful to E.N. Arnold for advice and in products derived from them, to help to ensure access to information resources in the Amphibian their conservation on a worldwide scale. and Reptile section at The Natural History Museum (London), and thank Stephen Edwards, The intention of this work is to provide a Chairman CITES Nomenclamre Committee, for combined list of amphibian and reptile species assistance. David Denison provided a program to appearing in Appendices I, II and III of CITES, renumber the extensive reference list to this indicating both the current Appendix and the volume. lUCN conservation stattis category. David Morgan of the JNCC International Policy This revised edition incorporates additions and Branch is thanked for providing expert advice and amendments to the CITES appendices up to and guidance throughout. including those made at the 9th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties in Florida in November Timothy Johnson 1994 (effective from 16 February 1995). The Head, Species Unit lUCN stams categories given here are those World Conservation Monitoring Centre current at the time of preparation, as represented 219 Huntingdon Road in the 1994 lUCN Red List of Threatened Animals Cambridge (Groombridge, 1993). CB3 ODL United Kingdom For background material on the rationale of the lUCN threat categories, readers are referred to Tel; +44 1223 277314 Groombridge (1993); for background on the Fax: +44 1223 277136 workings of CITES, recommended works are email: [email protected] Favre (1989) and Wijnstekers (1992). For information by country on the diversity and stams of amphibians, reptiles and other taxonomic groups, and for a general review of biodiversity, readers are referred to WCMC (1992) and WCMC (1994). In a publication of this nature, it is inevitable that users will discover entries that need correcting or updating. The publishers would be grateful if their attention could be drawn to these entries, and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre would be grateful to receive details of such changes so that they can be incorporated in the database from which this publication is produced. Explanatory notes Boidae (Stimson, 1969; Sheplan and Schwartz, Each species is typically represented by a block 1974; Underwood and Stimson, 1990). of text; including scientific name (with Colubridae (several sources, see individual alternatives). Common names in the three official entries). CITES languages (where available), geographic Elapidae and Viperidae (Klemmer, 1963; Leviton, range, CITES Appendix, Red List category, and 1968). numerical reference codes. Where a sp)ecies has component populations or formal subspecies Common names which are treated differently by CITES, the species entry is subdivided ^propriately. Common names and trade names appear below the scientific names; few of the listed taxa have Scientific names regularly or universally used common names. In some cases, identical trade names appear to be Nomenclature follows that used in the CITES used for different taxa. Appendices for the forms appearing therein. Geographical range For each taxon listed, the scientific name and authority is given first, with alternative names After the scientific and common names of each given in parentheses on the following line. In the taxon, the geographical range is given in terms of majority of cases these alternatives are the most political units, listed in alphabetical order. In frequent synonyms in current use. In a few cases, several cases, particularly where islands are these are recently proposed taxonomic changes concerned, further distribution details are given not yet in common use, and in others the thus 'Indonesia: Sumatra'. When the name of a scientific name in parentheses is that accepted by country is given as part of the range of a certain taxonomists, but not the name used in the CITES species, that species not occur Appendices. may throughout the country and may even be of only peripheral occurrence. The sequence of families within orders also conforms to the CITES Appendices (thus the A question mark '?' has been used in front of a amphibian families are in alphabetical order while country to indicate that there is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modeling and Partitioning the Nucleotide Evolutionary Process for Phylogenetic and Comparative Genomic Inference
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2007 Modeling And Partitioning The Nucleotide Evolutionary Process For Phylogenetic And Comparative Genomic Inference Todd Castoe University of Central Florida Part of the Biology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Castoe, Todd, "Modeling And Partitioning The Nucleotide Evolutionary Process For Phylogenetic And Comparative Genomic Inference" (2007). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3111. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3111 MODELING AND PARTITIONING THE NUCLEOTIDE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS FOR PHYLOGENETIC AND COMPARATIVE GENOMIC INFERENCE by TODD A. CASTOE B.S. SUNY – College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1999 M.S. The University of Texas at Arlington, 2001 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biomolecular Sciences in the Burnett College of Biomedical Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2007 Major Professor: Christopher L. Parkinson © 2007 Todd A. Castoe ii ABSTRACT The transformation of genomic data into functionally relevant information about the composition of biological systems hinges critically on the field of computational genome biology, at the core of which lies comparative genomics. The aim of comparative genomics is to extract meaningful functional information from the differences and similarities observed across genomes of different organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Distribution and Population Density of the African Chameleon Chamaeleo Africanus and the Common Chameleon Chamae
    VOL. 2015., No.1, Str. 36- 43 Original Scientific Paper Hyla Dimaki et al. 2015 ISSN: 1848-2007 New data on the distribution and population density of the African Chameleon, Chamaeleo africanus and the Common Chameleon, Chamaeleo chamaeleon in Greece Novi podatci o distribuciji i populacijskoj gustoći afričkog kamelenona, Chamaeleo africanus i običnog kameleona, Chamaeleo chamaeleo u Grčkoj 1 2 3 4 MARIA DIMAKI *, BASIL CHONDROPOULOS , ANASTASIOS LEGAKIS , EFSTRATIOS VALAKOS , MARIOS 1 VERGETOPOULOS 1Goulandris Natural History Museum, 100 Othonos St., 145 62 Kifissia, Greece, [email protected] 2Section of Animal Biology, Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Patra, Greece. 3Zoological Museum, Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Athens, Greece. 4Section of Animal & Human Physiology, Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Athens, Greece. Abstract New data on the distribution and the population density of the Common Chameleon Chamaeleo chamaeleon (Linnaeus, 1758) and the African Chameleon Chamaeleo africanus Laurenti, 1768 are reported from Greece. The data for the Common Chameleon was collected from Samos Island (Aegean Sea) and for the African Chameleon from the SW Peloponnese. The period of the data collection is from 1998 till 2014. The African Chameleon is an allochthonous species for Greece and its presence in the area of Gialova Pylos is likely due to its introduction in historical times, because chameleons were often used in the past as pets by people and kings (Bodson, 1984). Some months ago a new population of the Common Chameleon was discovered in Attica. The distribution of the African Chameleon has expanded in the western Peloponnese with at least two new populations. This expansion is due to the local translocation of the species by humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainforest Animals Question Sheet 2 the Answers to the Following Questions Can Be Found by Visiting
    www.ActiveWild.com Rainforest Animals Question Sheet 2 The answers to the following questions can be found by visiting: www.activewild.com/rainforest-animals-list/ (For each question, either underline or circle the correct answer.) 1. Is the Amazonian giant centipede 6. What is the smallest species of caiman? venomous? • Black caiman • Yes • No • Spectacled caiman 2. How does the Arrau turtle withdraw its neck into its shell? • Cuvier’s dwarf caiman • With a sideways motion 7. What type of animal is a coati? • It pulls its head straight back • Mammal in the cat family • It can’t withdraw its head • Mammal in the raccoon family • Reptile in the alligator family 3. What type of animal is an aye-aye? • Monkey 8. Where is the electric eel found? • Bushbaby • South America • Lemur • Southeast Asia • Africa 4. What is the Boa Constrictor’s scientific name? 9. The goliath beetle is the world’s largest • Corallus caninus beetle. Is it able to fly? • Yes • Boa constrictor • No • Boa imperator 10. True or false: the goliath birdeater spider’s diet consists almost entirely of 5. Is the Boa constrictor venomous? birds • Yes • True • No • False Copyright © 2019. All rights reserved. 1 www.ActiveWild.com 11. True or false: the green anaconda is the 17. True or false: piranhas are apex world’s longest snake. predators, with no predators of their own? • True • True • False • False 12. Why is the hoatzin also known as the ‘stinkbird’? 18. Tarsiers are known for having large… • It is found near swamps • Eyes • It ferments leaves in its crop • Brains • It feeds on dung • Teeth 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Reference Guide: Introduced Constrictors in Florida1 Steve A
    WEC302 Quick Reference Guide: Introduced Constrictors in Florida1 Steve A. Johnson and Monica E. McGarrity2 Three non-native species of large constrictor snakes are that these were escaped or released pets. View maps of loca- now breeding in Florida, and several others have been tions where each species has been encountered in Florida encountered but have not yet established wild populations. by visiting the EDDMapS Florida invasive species reporting This fact sheet, best viewed as a pdf (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ portal online at http://www.IveGot1.org. Learn more about pdffiles/UW/UW34700.pdf), is a quick reference guide how to scan for, recognize, and report introduced constric- to identification of the constrictors you are most likely to tors by completing the Introduced Reptile Early Detection encounter in Florida. Although many of these snakes are and Documentation training course. Visit http://ufwildlife. not established in the wild, they are common in the pet ifas.ufl.edu/reddy.shtml to learn more and get REDDy! trade, and each has been spotted in the wild—it is likely Pythons Burmese Python (Python bivittatus) Status: established, breeding populations; range expanding Head: dark arrowhead, light center line, dark and light in Florida wedges under eyes Size: up to 12 feet or longer Body: Giraffe-like spots, dark blotches not connected Figure 1. Burmese python. Credits: Head illustration by USGS; body illustration by Monica E. McGarrity, UF 1. This document is WEC302, one of a series of the Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date November 2010. Revised February 2014 and June 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Guidelines for Reptiles and Amphibians Used in Outreach
    RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS USED IN OUTREACH PROGRAMS Compiled by Diane Barber, Fort Worth Zoo Originally posted September 2003; updated February 2008 INTRODUCTION This document has been created by the AZA Reptile and Amphibian Taxon Advisory Groups to be used as a resource to aid in the development of institutional outreach programs. Within this document are lists of species that are commonly used in reptile and amphibian outreach programs. With over 12,700 species of reptiles and amphibians in existence today, it is obvious that there are numerous combinations of species that could be safely used in outreach programs. It is not the intent of these Taxon Advisory Groups to produce an all-inclusive or restrictive list of species to be used in outreach. Rather, these lists are intended for use as a resource and are some of the more common species that have been safely used in outreach programs. A few species listed as potential outreach animals have been earmarked as controversial by TAG members for various reasons. In each case, we have made an effort to explain debatable issues, enabling staff members to make informed decisions as to whether or not each animal is appropriate for their situation and the messages they wish to convey. It is hoped that during the species selection process for outreach programs, educators, collection managers, and other zoo staff work together, using TAG Outreach Guidelines, TAG Regional Collection Plans, and Institutional Collection Plans as tools. It is well understood that space in zoos is limited and it is important that outreach animals are included in institutional collection plans and incorporated into conservation programs when feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Membros Da Comissão Julgadora Da Dissertação
    UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, CIÊNCIAS E LETRAS DE RIBEIRÃO PRETO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOLOGIA COMPARADA Evolution of the skull shape in extinct and extant turtles Evolução da forma do crânio em tartarugas extintas e viventes Guilherme Hermanson Souza Dissertação apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, como parte das exigências para obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências, obtido no Programa de Pós- Graduação em Biologia Comparada Ribeirão Preto - SP 2021 UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, CIÊNCIAS E LETRAS DE RIBEIRÃO PRETO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOLOGIA COMPARADA Evolution of the skull shape in extinct and extant turtles Evolução da forma do crânio em tartarugas extintas e viventes Guilherme Hermanson Souza Dissertação apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, como parte das exigências para obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências, obtido no Programa de Pós- Graduação em Biologia Comparada. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Max Cardoso Langer Ribeirão Preto - SP 2021 Autorizo a reprodução e divulgação total ou parcial deste trabalho, por qualquer meio convencional ou eletrônico, para fins de estudo e pesquisa, desde que citada a fonte. I authorise the reproduction and total or partial disclosure of this work, via any conventional or electronic medium, for aims of study and research, with the condition that the source is cited. FICHA CATALOGRÁFICA Hermanson, Guilherme Evolution of the skull shape in extinct and extant turtles, 2021. 132 páginas. Dissertação de Mestrado, apresentada à Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto/USP – Área de concentração: Biologia Comparada.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevent Problems with Large Boas & Pythons
    Client Education—Snake Safety Tips Prevent Problems with Large Boas & Pythons ! According to the Humane Society of the United States,17 deaths and many more injuries have been related to large constrictors since 1978. Given the tens of thousands of large constrictors sold, the incidence of fatalities and injuries is relatively low, however every incident—including the death of four babies in their cribs and three additional children— is particularly tragic since such cases are completely preventable. So called “giant snakes” regularly exceed 8 feet (2.4 m) in length, potentially making them difficult or even unsafe to handle. Large constrictor species include the green anaconda (Eunectes murinus), Indian python (Python molurus), African rock python (Python sebae), amethystine python (Morelia amethistina), reticulated python (Python reticulatus), and Burmese python (Python molurus bivittatus). Only the latter two species, reticulated and Burmese pythons, are regularly found in the pet trade, however these species can exceed 20 feet (6.1 m) and are not recommended for casual hobbyists. One real life tragedy: In 2011, a Florida mother and her boyfriend were found guilty of the murder of her 2-year old daughter, strangled by her 8-foot 6- “The baby’s dead. inch pet Burmese python. The child was found in her crib, with the Our stupid snake snake coiled tightly around her neck and numerous bite marks on got out in the middle her face. of the night and strangled the Evaluation of the albino python named “Gypsy” found her to be baby”.—Florida man underweight, and the snake's enclosure had only a quilt for a lid.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Rule to List Reticulated Python And
    Vol. 80 Tuesday, No. 46 March 10, 2015 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife 50 CFR Part 16 Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing Three Anaconda Species and One Python Species as Injurious Reptiles; Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\10MRR2.SGM 10MRR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 12702 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 3330) to list Burmese (and Indian) Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, pythons, Northern African pythons, Fish and Wildlife Service FL 32960–3559; telephone 772–562– Southern African pythons, and yellow 3909 ext. 256; facsimile 772–562–4288. anacondas as injurious wildlife under 50 CFR Part 16 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob the Lacey Act. The remaining five RIN 1018–AV68 Progulske, Everglades Program species (reticulated python, boa Supervisor, South Florida Ecological constrictor, green anaconda, [Docket No. FWS–R9–FHC–2008–0015; Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife DeSchauensee’s anaconda, and Beni FXFR13360900000–145–FF09F14000] Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, anaconda) were not listed at that time and remained under consideration for Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing FL 32960–3559; telephone 772–469– 4299. If you use a telecommunications listing. With this final rule, we are Three Anaconda Species and One listing four of those species (reticulated Python Species as Injurious Reptiles device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service python, green anaconda, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Acrantophis Madagascariensis (Duméril & Bibron, 1844) and A
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Gardner, Charlie J. and McDonnell, Naidi and Ellis, Charlotte and Jasper, Louise D. (2017) Observations of aquatic behaviour in Malagasy ground boas Acrantophis madagascariensis (Duméril & Bibron, 1844) and A. dumerili Jan, 1860. Herpetology Notes, 10 . pp. 271-273. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/84414/ Document Version Author's Accepted Manuscript Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html 1 Observations of aquatic behaviour in Malagasy ground boas 2 Acrantophis madagascariensis (Duméril & Bibron, 1844) and A. 3 dumerili Jan, 1860 4 5 Charlie J. GardnerI, Naidi McDonnellII, Charlotte EllisII and Louise D. JasperIII 6 7 8 I Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NR, 9 UK 10 II Operation Wallacea, Wallace House, Old Bolingbroke, Spilsby, Lincolnshire, PE23 4EX, 11 UK 12 III Independent Researcher 13 14 Madagascar possesses a diverse snake fauna comprising over 90 species in four families 15 (Jenkins et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade in Live Reptiles, Its Impact on Wild Populations, and the Role of the European Market
    BIOC-06813; No of Pages 17 Biological Conservation xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bioc Review Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market Mark Auliya a,⁎,SandraAltherrb, Daniel Ariano-Sanchez c, Ernst H. Baard d,CarlBrownd,RafeM.Browne, Juan-Carlos Cantu f,GabrieleGentileg, Paul Gildenhuys d, Evert Henningheim h, Jürgen Hintzmann i, Kahoru Kanari j, Milivoje Krvavac k, Marieke Lettink l, Jörg Lippert m, Luca Luiselli n,o, Göran Nilson p, Truong Quang Nguyen q, Vincent Nijman r, James F. Parham s, Stesha A. Pasachnik t,MiguelPedronou, Anna Rauhaus v,DannyRuedaCórdovaw, Maria-Elena Sanchez x,UlrichScheppy, Mona van Schingen z,v, Norbert Schneeweiss aa, Gabriel H. Segniagbeto ab, Ruchira Somaweera ac, Emerson Y. Sy ad,OguzTürkozanae, Sabine Vinke af, Thomas Vinke af,RajuVyasag, Stuart Williamson ah,1,ThomasZieglerai,aj a Department Conservation Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Conservation (UFZ), Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany b Pro Wildlife, Kidlerstrasse 2, 81371 Munich, Germany c Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle de, Guatemala d Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, South Africa e Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA f Bosques de Cerezos 112, C.P. 11700 México D.F., Mexico g Dipartimento di Biologia, Universitá Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy h Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    [Show full text]