DOCSLIB.ORG

Cfreptiles & Amphibians

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS IRCF REPTILES • VOL15, & NAMPHIBIANSO 4 • DEC 2008 •189 22(3):102–105 • SEP 2015 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES Range. ChasingExtension Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi ) inand Wisconsin: Geographic Distribution On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: RecordA Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................ for the Burmese Python,Robert W. Henderson 198 RESEARCHPython ARTICLES bivittatus Kuhl 1820 . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida (Reptilia: ............................................. Pythonidae)Brian J. Camposano, Kenneth L. Krysko, in Kevin M.Northwestern Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 India CONSERVATION ALERT Ritesh Joshi1 and Abhishek Singh2 . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 1Conservation. More & Survey Than Mammals Division, ...................................................................................................................................................................... Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi, India ([email protected]) 223 2Endangered. The “DowFlora Jones and Index”Fauna of on Biodiversity Earth Conservation ........................................................................................................................................... Team, VasantVihar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India ([email protected]) 225 HUSBANDRY . Captive Care of the Central Netted Dragon ....................................................................................................... Shannon Plummer 226 nakes in the familyPROFILE Pythonidae include some of the Sworld’s largest and. Kraigmost Adler: spectacular A Lifetime Promoting reptiles Herpetology that ................................................................................................comprise Michael L. Treglia 234 an enormous diversity of morphology, behavior, and ecology COMMENTARY (Reynolds et al. 2014). The Indian Subcontinent is home to . The Turtles Have Been Watching Me ........................................................................................................................ Eric Gangloff 238 three species of pythons, the Indian Python (Python molu- rus Linnaeus 1758),BOOK the Burmese REVIEW Python (P. bivittatus Kuhl . Threatened Amphibians of the World edited by S.N. Stuart, M. Hoffmann, J.S. Chanson, N.A. Cox, 1820), and the ReticulatedR. Berridge, Python P. Ramani, (Malayopython and B.E. Young .............................................................................................................. reticulatus Robert Powell 243 Schneider 1801). Until recently, the Burmese Python was considered a subspecies CONSERVATION of the Indian RESEARCH Python REPORTS: (e.g., Summaries Smith of Published Conservation Research Reports ................................. 245 NATURAL HISTORY RESEARCH REPORTS: Summaries of Published Reports on Natural History ................................. 247 1943; Daniel 1983; NEWBRIEFS O’Shea 1998; ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Whitaker and Captain 248 2004) but the two taxaEDITORIAL now areINFORMATION considered ..................................................................................................................................................... distinct species 251 (Jacobs et al. 2009; ReynoldsFOCUS ON etCONSERVATION al. 2014; Barker: A Project et al. You 2015). Can Support ............................................................................................... 252 The Reticulated Python previously was assigned to the genus Fig. 2. Burmese Python (Python bivittatus) in the Mitthawali River flowing Python but was reassigned to Malayopython by Auliya et al. in the Chilla Forest of Rajaji National Park. Photograph by Ritesh Joshi. (2002) and Reynolds et al. (2014). Front Cover. Shannon Plummer. Back Cover. Michael Kern Bhupathy (1995) provided an Totatoverview et velleseque of audantthe distribu mo - Totat et velleseque audant mo tion of the latter two species in India,estibus inveliquowhich velique revealed rerchil that theestibus Burmese inveliquo veliquePython, rerchil which is a Malayan faunal element, has erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum aaut wide dolor apictodistribution invere pe dolum in northeastern India. That study also fugiatis maionsequat eumque revealedfugiatis maionsequat that the eumquespecies is distributed along the Himalayan moditia erere nonsedis ma sectiatur moditia erere nonsedis ma sectia- ma derrovitae voluptam, as quos foothills,tur ma derrovitae which voluptam, include as part of the Rajaji National Park accullabo. (RNP), the terai (a belt of marshy grasslands, savannas, and forests located south of the outer foothills of the Himalayas, the Shivalik Hills, an area north of the Indo-Gangetic Plain of the Ganges, the Brahmaputra, and their tributaries), and the mangroves of the eastern coast at least as far as the Bhitarkanika Wildlife Sanctuary in India (the Mahanadi- Brahmani-Baitarani Delta). The Indian Python is widely distributed in peninsular India from Sind in the northwest to Bengal in the northeast, whereas the Burmese Python occurs in the Indo-Chinese Subregion, southern China, Hong Kong, and Hainan (Smith 1943). Precise information on the distribution of the Burmese Python in India is not available except for the Indo-Chinese Fig. 1. Burmese Python (Python bivittatus) in a rock crevice in the Khara Forest of the Chilla Forest Range of the Rajaji National Park. Photograph Subregion (i.e., parts of northeastern India; Daniel 1983; by Ritesh Joshi. Bhupathy 1995). These species differ morphologically in that Copyright © 2015. Ritesh Joshi. All rights reserved. 102 JOSHI1 AND SINGH IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • 22(3):102–105 • SEP 2015 (DFD) are located in northwestern India at 29°15’–30°31’N, 77º52’–78°22’E and 30°2’–31º26’N, 77°52’–78°19’E, and fall in the Gangetic Plains Biogeographic Zone and the Upper Gangetic Plains Province. The largest portion of RNP is in Shivalik’s Biogeographic Subdivision, which constitutes an important repository of reptilian fauna. Distinguishing Indian and Burmese Pythons in the field can be difficult, since diagnostic characters cannot always be seen when animals are moving, high in a tree, or in refugia. Consequently, we randomly collected photographic evi- dence in 2006–2010 to document the presence of both spe- cies in the Chilla Forest of the RNP and adjoining protected areas. Both species were identified based on descriptions in Smith (1943), Daniel (1983), O’Shea (1998), Whitaker and Captain (2004), and Jacobs et al. (2009). We also consulted forest officials, local people, and the Gujjar nomadic commu- Fig. 3. The largest Burmese Python (Python bivittatus; ~3.5 m) recorded nity residing both in and outside the park area. from the Chilla Forest of Rajaji National Park. Photograph by Raju Pushola. On 31 March 2007, a Burmese Python of unknown sex was recorded resting in a rock crevice in the Khara Forest of the Chilla Forest Range of the RNP (29°53’50.5ʺN, in Indian Pythons, the sixth or seventh labial contacts the eye, 78°16’47.8ʺE; Figs. 1–2). On 9 August 2007, an individual a lance-shaped mark on top of the head is indistinct in adults, was observed in the Chilla Forest near the Haridwar-Chilla- and the tongue is pink; whereas in Burmese Pythons the labi- Rishikesh Road; this snake was rescued and relocated inside als are separated from the eye by suboculars, the lance-shaped the forest (29°58’15.6ʺN, 78°12’41.8ʺE; Fig. 3). Another mark on the head is distinct, and the tongue is blue-black individual was sighted shortly thereafter near the Haridwar (Smith 1943; Daniel 2002; O’Shea 1998; Whitaker and Forest Range of the RNP (29°56’23ʺN, 78°7’23ʺE; Fig. 4). Captain 2004; Jacobs et al. 2009). Three additional observations of Burmese Pythons were Inventories conducted by the Zoological Survey of India made in the DFD. On 15 September 2010, an individual (ZSI) during 1995 and 2008 in RNP and the Corbett Tiger Burmese Python was observed near the Canal Road along Reserve (CTR) corroborated the presence of the Indian the Rispna River near Jakhan (30°21’57.7ʺN, 78°04’38.7ʺE). Python in these protected habitats (Husain and Tilak 1995; Subsequently, on 14 October 2011 and 8 November 2011, Bahuguna 2008). Subsequently, Bahuguna (2010) stated adults were observed in the Timli Forest Range of the Kalsi that the Indian Python occurs in RNP and parts of CTR Forest Division (30°20’–30°25’N, 77°40’–77°45’E; Figs. (Bahuguna 2010). After the first report of Burmese Pythons 5–6) and in the Lacchiwala Forest Range (30°15’19.1ʺN, in RNP by Bhupathy (1995), Whitaker and Captain (2004), 78°01’55.8ʺE; Fig. 7). Most
Recommended publications
  • Liasis Fuscus) in Tropical Australia

    Liasis Fuscus) in Tropical Australia

    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 1-1-2009 Spatial ecology of hatchling water pythons (Liasis fuscus) in tropical Australia Richard Shine University of Sydney Thomas R. Madsen University of Wollongong, [email protected] Ligia Pizzatto University of Sydney Gregory P. Brown University of Sydney Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers Part of the Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Shine, Richard; Madsen, Thomas R.; Pizzatto, Ligia; and Brown, Gregory P.: Spatial ecology of hatchling water pythons (Liasis fuscus) in tropical Australia 2009, 181-191. https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers/380 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Spatial ecology of hatchling water pythons (Liasis fuscus) in tropical Australia Abstract Young snakes are rarely seen in the field and little is known about their habits. mostly because they are too small for radio-telemetry (the primary method for Studying snake spatial ecology). However, the offspring or some larger species can be fitted with transmitters and we investigated the spatial ecology and habitat use of ten hatchling water pythons (Liasis fuscus: Pythonidae) in the floodplain of the Adelaide River, tropical Australia. Patterns of habitat use in the late wet season and during the dry season were similar to those of adults tracked in the same vicinity in an earlier study. Soon after release the young snakes moved to the floodplain, va oiding pasture areas.
  • The Faunal Assemblage of the Paleonto-Archeological Localities Of

    The Faunal Assemblage of the Paleonto-Archeological Localities Of

    G Model PALEVO-910; No. of Pages 20 ARTICLE IN PRESS C. R. Palevol xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Comptes Rendus Palevol www.sci encedirect.com Human palaeontology and prehistory The faunal assemblage of the paleonto-archeological localities of the Late Pliocene Quranwala Zone, Masol Formation, Siwalik Range, NW India L’assemblage faunique des localités paléonto-archéologiques de la zone Quranwala, Pliocène final, formation de Masol, chaîne frontale des Siwaliks, Nord-Ouest de l’Inde a,∗ a b Anne-Marie Moigne , Anne Dambricourt Malassé , Mukesh Singh , b a b b Amandeep Kaur , Claire Gaillard , Baldev Karir , Surinder Pal , b a a Vipnesh Bhardwaj , Salah Abdessadok , Cécile Chapon Sao , c c Julien Gargani , Alina Tudryn a Histoire naturelle de l’homme préhistorique (HNHP, UMR 7194 CNRS), Tautavel, France b Society for Archaeological and Anthropological Research, Chandigarh, India c Géosciences Paris-Sud (GEOPS, UMR 8148 CNRS), université Paris-Sud, Paris, France a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: The Indo-French Program of Research ‘Siwaliks’ carried out investigations in the ‘Quranwala Received 23 June 2015 zone’ of the Masol Formation (Tatrot), Chandigarh Siwalik Range, known since the 1960s Accepted after revision 17 September 2015 for its “transitional fauna”. This new paleontological study was implemented following the Available online xxx discovery of bones with cut marks near choppers and flakes in quartzite collected on the outcrops. Nine fieldwork seasons (2008–2015) on 50 hectares of ravines and a small plateau Handled by Anne Dambricourt Malassé recovered lithic tools and fossil assemblages in 12 localities with approximately 1500 fos- sils.
  • Quick Reference Guide: Introduced Constrictors in Florida1 Steve A

    Quick Reference Guide: Introduced Constrictors in Florida1 Steve A

    WEC302 Quick Reference Guide: Introduced Constrictors in Florida1 Steve A. Johnson and Monica E. McGarrity2 Three non-native species of large constrictor snakes are that these were escaped or released pets. View maps of loca- now breeding in Florida, and several others have been tions where each species has been encountered in Florida encountered but have not yet established wild populations. by visiting the EDDMapS Florida invasive species reporting This fact sheet, best viewed as a pdf (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ portal online at http://www.IveGot1.org. Learn more about pdffiles/UW/UW34700.pdf), is a quick reference guide how to scan for, recognize, and report introduced constric- to identification of the constrictors you are most likely to tors by completing the Introduced Reptile Early Detection encounter in Florida. Although many of these snakes are and Documentation training course. Visit http://ufwildlife. not established in the wild, they are common in the pet ifas.ufl.edu/reddy.shtml to learn more and get REDDy! trade, and each has been spotted in the wild—it is likely Pythons Burmese Python (Python bivittatus) Status: established, breeding populations; range expanding Head: dark arrowhead, light center line, dark and light in Florida wedges under eyes Size: up to 12 feet or longer Body: Giraffe-like spots, dark blotches not connected Figure 1. Burmese python. Credits: Head illustration by USGS; body illustration by Monica E. McGarrity, UF 1. This document is WEC302, one of a series of the Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date November 2010. Revised February 2014 and June 2017.
  • Chennai Snake Park

    Chennai Snake Park

    CHENNAI SNAKE PARK Annual Report for the year 2017-18 CHENNAI SNAKE PARK TRUST RAJBHAVAN POST, CHENNAI – 600 022. 1 CONTENTS S.No Section Page Number 1. Report of the Officer-in- charge 5 2. History of the Zoo 5 3. Vision 7 4. Mission 7 5. Objective 7 6. About us 8 7. Organizational Chart 11 8. Human Resources 11 9. Capacity Building of the zoo personnel 12 10. Zoo Advisory Committee 13 11. Health Advisory Committee 13 2 S.No Section Page Number 12. Statement of income and expenditure of the Zoo 13 13. Daily feed Schedule of animals 14 14. Vaccination Schedule of animals 14 15. De-worming Schedule of animals 14 16. Disinfection Schedule 16 17. Health Check-up of employees for zoonotic diseases 16 18. Development Works carried out in the zoo during the year 16 19. Education and Awareness programmes during the year 16 20. Important Events and happenings in the zoo 18 21. Seasonal special arrangements for upkeep of animals 18 22. Research Work carried out and publications 18 23. Conservation Breeding Programme of the Zoo 19 24. Animal acquisition / transfer / exchange during the year 19 3 S.No Section Page Number 25. Rescue and Rehabilitation of the wild animals carried out by the zoo 19 26. Annual Inventory of animals 20 27. Mortality of animals. 22 28. Status of the Compliance with conditions stipulated by the Central 22 Zoo Authority 29. List of free living wild animals within the zoo premises 24 4 1. Report of the Officer-in-charge During the year there is increase in the visitors when compare last year.
  • Opinion No. 82-811

    Opinion No. 82-811

    TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP Attorney General _________________________ : OPINION : No. 82-811 : of : APRI 28, 1983 : JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP : Attorney General : : JOHN T. MURPHY : Deputy Attorney General : : ________________________________________________________________________ THE HONORABLE ROBERT W. NAYLOR, A MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following question: Does "python" as used in Penal Code section 653o to identify an endangered snake include "anaconda"? CONCLUSION As used in Penal Code section 653o to identify an endangered snake, "python" does not include "anaconda." 1 82-811 ANALYSIS Penal Code section 653o, subd. (a), provides as follows: "It is unlawful to import into this state for commercial purposes, to possess with intent to sell, or to sell within the state, the dead body, or any part or product thereof, of any alligator, crocodile, polar bear, leopard, ocelot, tiger, cheetah, jaguar, sable antelope, wolf (Canis lupus), zebra, whale, cobra, python, sea turtle, colobus monkey, kangaroo, vicuna, sea otter, free-roaming feral horse, dolphin or porpoise (Delphinidae), Spanish lynx, or elephant." "Any person who violates any provision of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) or imprisonment in the county jail for not to exceed six months, or both such fine and imprisonment, for each violation." (Emphasis added.) We are asked whether or not the term "python" in this statute includes "anaconda." Section 653o was enacted in 1970 (Stats.
  • Prevent Problems with Large Boas & Pythons

    Prevent Problems with Large Boas & Pythons

    Client Education—Snake Safety Tips Prevent Problems with Large Boas & Pythons ! According to the Humane Society of the United States,17 deaths and many more injuries have been related to large constrictors since 1978. Given the tens of thousands of large constrictors sold, the incidence of fatalities and injuries is relatively low, however every incident—including the death of four babies in their cribs and three additional children— is particularly tragic since such cases are completely preventable. So called “giant snakes” regularly exceed 8 feet (2.4 m) in length, potentially making them difficult or even unsafe to handle. Large constrictor species include the green anaconda (Eunectes murinus), Indian python (Python molurus), African rock python (Python sebae), amethystine python (Morelia amethistina), reticulated python (Python reticulatus), and Burmese python (Python molurus bivittatus). Only the latter two species, reticulated and Burmese pythons, are regularly found in the pet trade, however these species can exceed 20 feet (6.1 m) and are not recommended for casual hobbyists. One real life tragedy: In 2011, a Florida mother and her boyfriend were found guilty of the murder of her 2-year old daughter, strangled by her 8-foot 6- “The baby’s dead. inch pet Burmese python. The child was found in her crib, with the Our stupid snake snake coiled tightly around her neck and numerous bite marks on got out in the middle her face. of the night and strangled the Evaluation of the albino python named “Gypsy” found her to be baby”.—Florida man underweight, and the snake's enclosure had only a quilt for a lid.
  • Final Rule to List Reticulated Python And

    Final Rule to List Reticulated Python And

    Vol. 80 Tuesday, No. 46 March 10, 2015 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife 50 CFR Part 16 Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing Three Anaconda Species and One Python Species as Injurious Reptiles; Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\10MRR2.SGM 10MRR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 12702 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 3330) to list Burmese (and Indian) Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, pythons, Northern African pythons, Fish and Wildlife Service FL 32960–3559; telephone 772–562– Southern African pythons, and yellow 3909 ext. 256; facsimile 772–562–4288. anacondas as injurious wildlife under 50 CFR Part 16 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob the Lacey Act. The remaining five RIN 1018–AV68 Progulske, Everglades Program species (reticulated python, boa Supervisor, South Florida Ecological constrictor, green anaconda, [Docket No. FWS–R9–FHC–2008–0015; Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife DeSchauensee’s anaconda, and Beni FXFR13360900000–145–FF09F14000] Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, anaconda) were not listed at that time and remained under consideration for Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing FL 32960–3559; telephone 772–469– 4299. If you use a telecommunications listing. With this final rule, we are Three Anaconda Species and One listing four of those species (reticulated Python Species as Injurious Reptiles device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service python, green anaconda, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
  • Bulletin 107 FRONT COVER FIXED.Indd

    Bulletin 107 FRONT COVER FIXED.Indd

    The HERPETOLOGICAL BULLETIN Number 107 – Spring 2009 PUBLISHED BY THE BRITISH HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE HERPETOLOGICAL BULLETIN Contents NEWS REPO R TS . 1 RESEA R CH AR TICLES Possible decline in an American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) population on Turneffe Atoll, Belize Thomas R. Rainwater and Steven G. Platt ............................. 3 Range extension of Kaestlea beddomeii (Boulenger, 1887) (in part) (Reptilia: Sauria: Scincidae) S. R. Ganesh and P. Gowri Shankar ................................. 12 The herpetofauna of Koanaka South and adjacent regions, Ngamiland, Botswana Aaron M. Bauer, Alicia M. Kennedy, Patrick J. Lewis, Monte L. Thies and . Mohutsiwa Gabadirwe . 16 Prodichotomy in the snake Oreocryptophis porhyraceus coxi (Schulz & Helfenberger, 1998) (Serpentes: Colubridae) David Jandzik . 27 Reptiles and amphibians from the Kenyan coastal hinterland N. Thomas Håkansson . 30 NATU R AL HISTO R Y NOTES Nucras taeniolata Smith, 1838 (Striped Sandveld Lizard) (Sauria, Lacertidae): additional records William R. Branch and M. Burger . 40 Oreocryptophis porphyraceus coxi (Thai Bamboo Ratsnake): pattern abnormality David Jandzik . 41 Norops sagrei (Brown Anole): pathology and endoparasite Gerrut Norval, Charles R. Bursey, Stephen R. Goldberg, Chun-Liang Tung and Jean-Jay Mao . 42 - Registered Charity No. 205666 - - Registered Charity No. 205666 - THE HERPETOLOGICAL BULLETIN The Herpetological Bulletin is produced quarterly and publishes, in English, a range of articles concerned with herpetology. These include society news, selected news reports, full-length papers of a semi- technical nature, new methodologies, natural history notes, book reviews, letters from readers and other items of general herpetological interest. Emphasis is placed on natural history, conservation, captive breeding and husbandry, veterinary and behavioural aspects. Articles reporting the results of experimental research, descriptions of new taxa, or taxonomic revisions should be submitted to The Herpetological Journal (see inside back cover for Editor’s address).
  • RETICULATED PYTHON Malayopython Reticulatus (SCHNEIDER 1801) : RESCUE, RECOVERY and RECENT SIGHTINGS from GREAT NICOBAR ISLAND-A CONSERVATION APPROACH

    RETICULATED PYTHON Malayopython Reticulatus (SCHNEIDER 1801) : RESCUE, RECOVERY and RECENT SIGHTINGS from GREAT NICOBAR ISLAND-A CONSERVATION APPROACH

    ECOPRINT 22: 50-55, 2015 ISSN 1024-8668 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/eco.v22i0.15470 Ecological Society (ECOS), Nepal www.nepjol.info/index.php/eco; www.ecosnepal.com RETICULATED PYTHON Malayopython reticulatus (SCHNEIDER 1801) : RESCUE, RECOVERY AND RECENT SIGHTINGS FROM GREAT NICOBAR ISLAND-A CONSERVATION APPROACH S. Rajeshkumar 1*, C. Raghunathan 1 and Kailash Chandra 2 1Zoological Survey of India, Andaman and Nicobar Regional Centre Port Blair-744 102, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India 2Zoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkatta-700 053, India *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Previously the Reticulated python was recorded by few researchers from Nicobar Islands In 2006, four individuals were observed, but there was no more information added in their literature about sightings in Great Nicobar Island. Pythons were considered as an uncommon and rare encountered species in India also to the Nicobar Islands. Pythons considered relatively rare appearance to have declined due to frequent eradication by habitat destruction On 25 th August 2013, first individual of reticulated python was caught by the local people at Govind Nagar (Lat: 07° 00.074' N, Long: 093° 54.128' E, Altitude at 49.4 meter) in Great Nicobar Island The second one was rescued on 31 st August 2013 in the same area by the local people. Both the recovered individuals were appeared as juvenile. Investigations on population census of this threatened species and their habitat have been felt from the present incidences. Key words : .................................... INTRODUCTION as Malayopython reticulatus (Schneider 1801). Snakes are perhaps one of the most difficult Python is locally (in Nicobarese) called as vertebrate groups to survey (Groombridge and ‘Yammai’ or ‘Tulanth’ (Chandi 2006) and Luxmoore 1991).
  • Biodiversity of Earthworm Resources in Gangetic Plain of Uttar Pradesh, India

    Biodiversity of Earthworm Resources in Gangetic Plain of Uttar Pradesh, India

    Tropical Natural History 10(1): 53-60, April 2010 ©2010 by Chulalongkorn University Biodiversity of Earthworm Resources in Gangetic Plain of Uttar Pradesh, India DEEPSHIKHA VERMA, SHACHI BHARTI AND YADAV SHWETA * Vermiculture Research Station, Department of Zoology, D.S. College, Aligarh – 202001, INDIA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Received: 8 October 2009; Accepted: 30 December 2009 ABSTRACT.– Based on an extensive survey of Gangetic Plain of Uttar Pradesh during August – October 2008, the communication reports 11 taxa of earthworms, namely, Eutyphoeus incommodus, E. orientalis, E. pharpingianus, E. waltoni, Lampito mauritii, Metaphire anomala, M. birmanica, M. posthuma, Pellogaster bengalensis, Perionyx sansibaricus, Polypheretima elongata belonging to 6 genera and 2 families that were commonly found in the study area. This constitutes 2.6 per cent of total Indian earthworm fauna. Of these, 4 taxa are exotic with extra-Indian origin. Collection and environmental information on each occurrence of a species are given. The study contributes first-hand material on earthworm fauna of the study area, thus far neglected, and likely to add more native species to the existing ones, which are very specific for vermicomposting processes. KEY WORDS: biodiversity, earthworm, agro-climatic zones, Gangetic Plain, India INTRODUCTION been cleared on a large scale primarily for agricultural practices, construction and other Earthworms (folk names, include dew- developmental activities. Changes in land worm, rain worms, night crawler, angle use pattern have directly affected the worm, and Kechua, Giduala, in Uttar composition and population structure of Pradesh) are important biological resources earthworm communities in different agro- that have a tremendous potential in agro- climatic regions of the country (Blanchart ecosystems because they significantly affect and Julka, 1997; Behera et al., 1999; soil physical structures and organic matter Bhadauria et al., 2000).
  • Biodiversity and Community Structure of Spiders in Saran, Part of Indo-Gangetic Plain, India

    Biodiversity and Community Structure of Spiders in Saran, Part of Indo-Gangetic Plain, India

    Asian Journal of Conservation Biology, December 2015. Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 121-129 AJCB: FP0062 ISSN 2278-7666 ©TCRP 2015 Biodiversity and Community structure of spiders in Saran, part of Indo-Gangetic Plain, India N Priyadarshini1*, R Kumari1, R N Pathak1, A K Pandey2 1Department of Zoology, D. A. V. College, J. P. University, Chhapra, India 2School of Environmental Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India (Accepted November 21, 2015) ABSTRACT Present study was conducted to reveals the community structure and diversity of spider species in different habitat types (gardens, crop fields and houses) of Saran; a part of Indo – Gangetic Plain, India. This area has very rich diversity of flora and fauna due to its climatic conditions, high soil fer- tility and plenty of water availability. The spiders were sampled using two semi-quantitative methods and pitfall traps. A total of 1400 individual adult spiders belonging to 50 species, 29 genera and 15 families were recorded during 1st December 2013 to 28th February 2014. Spider species of houses were distinctive from other habitats it showed low spider species richness. The dominant spider fami- lies were also differs with habitat types. Araneidae, Pholcidae and Salticidae were the dominant spi- der families in gardens, houses and crop fields respectively. Comparison of beta diversity showed higher dissimilarity in spider communities of gardens and houses and higher similarity between spi- der communities of crop fields and gardens. We find that spiders are likely to be more abundant and species rich in gardens than in other habitat types. Habitat structural component had great impact on spider species richness and abundance in studied habitats.
  • Evidence for Range Maintenance and Homing in a New World Elapid, The

    Evidence for Range Maintenance and Homing in a New World Elapid, The

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/092833; this version posted December 9, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Evidence for Philopatry and Homing in a New World Elapid Snake Alexander S. Hall1, Abigail M. K. Vázquez-Quinto2, Antonio Ramírez-Velázquez2, Eric N. Smith1 1 Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA. E- mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2 Zoológico Regional Miguel Álvarez del Toro, Calzada Cerro Hueco, Col Zapotal, C. P. 29094, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, México. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Short running title: Homing elapid bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/092833; this version posted December 9, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Homing elapid 2 Abstract Animal navigation allows individuals to efficiently find and use best available habitats. Despite the long history of research into well-studied taxa (e.g., pigeons, salmon, sea turtles), we know relatively little about squamate navigational abilities. Among snakes, documented philopatry (range maintenance) in a non-colubrid species has been rare. In this study, we document the first example of philopatry and homing in a new world elapid snake, Micrurus apiatus.