Flea News 53

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Flea News 53 flea NEWS 53 Department of Entomology Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 <http://www.ent.iastate.edu/FleaNews/ AboutFleaNews.html> or through the Table of Contents internet via anonymous FTP: Book Reviews....................613-617 <ftp.ent.iastate.edu> in the "Publications" directory. Electronic Literature........................626-632 versions are available for No. 46, July, Miscellanea...........................617 1993; No. 47, December, 1993; No. 48, Obituaries........................618-626 July, 1994; No. 49, December, 1994; No. 50, June, 1995; No. 51, December, Report...................................632 1995; No. 52, June, 1996 and this number. The opinions and assertions con- FLEA NEWS is a biannual newsletter tained herein are the private ones of devoted to matters involving insects the authors and are not to be constru- belonging to the order Siphonaptera (fleas) and related subjects. It is com- ed as official or as reflecting the views piled and distributed free of charge by of the Department of Entomology, Robert E. Lewis ([email protected]) Iowa State University or Sandoz in cooperation with the Department of Animal Health. Entomology at Iowa State University, Ames, IA, and a grant in aid from ❊❆❊❆❊❆❊ Sandoz Animal Health, based in Des Plaines, IL. It is mainly bibliograph-ic in nature. Many of the sources are NOTICE abstracting journals and title pages Effective 1-January-1997 I will and not all citations have been check- have retired from the Iowa State ed for completeness or accuracy. Ad- University. I intend to remain active ditional information will be provided professionally and will continue to upon written or e-mail request. Fur- produce this newsletter as long as ther, recipients are urged to contri-bute there is support for it. After January items of interest to the profess-ion for first I may be contacted in the following inclusion herein. ways: This newsletter is now available in electronic format. The preferred Snail Mail; 3906 Stone Brooke method of accessing the electronic Circle, Ames, IA 50010-4174 version is through the WorldWide Web Telephone; (515) 232 7714 at the following Universal Res-ource Fax; (515) 233 1851 Locator: E-mail; [email protected] DECEMBER 1996 612 BOOK REVIEWS heading of STATISTICS, "... the subjective nature of the infraspecific Since the last issue of Flea News, three category itself makes it likely that the rather extensive publications have number of valid North American taxa appeared dealing with three separate will diminish rather than increase as parts of the world. Two of these are generic revisions are completed." faunal inventories, one for North The chapter begins with a brief America north of Mexico (not yet Introduction and a short section on published at this writing), the other for Statistics, including the number of Australia. The third is a more species erected for the North American comprehensive treatment of the South fauna from 1758 to 1996 in increments African fauna. Following are reviews of of 10 years. Following this is a table in these publications. which the eight families found in North America are named, with the total Nomina Insecta Nearctica number of names associated with each Volume 3. Diptera, Lepidoptera, family, followed by the actual number Siphonaptera. of "valid" species names. The totals are 562 names and 314 valid species. Compiled by Robert W. Poole and Next is a list of all of the family edited by Robert W. Poole and Patricia names that have been applied in the Gentili. Published by Entomological order, including junior synonyms, and Information Services. P. O. Box 4350, families not represented in North Rockville, MD 20849-4350 USA. America. The junior synonyms are associated with currently accepted In Flea News 52: 600 I briefly family names. There follows a mentioned this series, based on an classification of the North American announcement of the publication of Siphonaptera in which the eight Volume 1, which dealt with the families are assigned to five Coleoptera and Strepsiptera. Shortly superfamilies following the system thereafter I was contacted by Dr. established by Smit (1982) in S. P. Poole, inquiring whether I would be Parker (ed.) Synopsis and classification willing to cooperate with him by of living organisms. McGraw-Hill Book providing the chapter on the Company, pp. 557-563. Siphonaptera for Volume 3. This I The remainder of the chapter have done, and it is my understanding consists of three parts in which the that the volume will be available early North American fauna is listed in in January of 1997. Though I have not differing formats. The first is an seen the finished product, I have a copy alphabetical listing of the families of the chapter in its final form, and am under which the genera and species are basing this review on it. also listed alphabetically, as well as The Siphonaptera chapter differs their original generic designation, from those dealing with the other subspecies, synonyms and other orders in that it includes subspecies. invalid applications. Generic Opposed as I am to the subspecies synonyms and other misapplications category, arbitrarily ignoring it in this are included under their respective order without resorting to studying the genera. The second part is an types would be both confusing and a alphabetical list of all species, disservice to the taxonomic subspecies and synonyms, including community. As I point out under the the name of the author, original generic FLEA NEWS 613 assignment, family and present generic Page 136 contains illustrations of assignment. Junior synonyms are the head and prothorax of repre- accompanied by their senior sentatives of eight of the nine counterparts. The last section is an siphonapteran families found in alphabetical list of all genera, their Australia and adjacent islands. The authors and family assignment. Junior next six pages contain introductory synonyms are also indicated. The last remarks on the order, brief notes about two sections are indices and the the catalogue, acknowledge-ments and finished product will include page a list of pertinent refer-ences. The numbers. following pages con-tain accounts of While such checklists provide little the families, genera and species known beyond nomenclatural inform-ation, from the country, arranged they are essential, since they are an alphabetically. Each family account indication of taxonomic opinion at the begins with a brief intro-duction and a time of publication and provide a list of pertinent references. The framework for a more extensive genera, subgenera, species and treatment of the group. It is the subspecies are ac-companied by expectation of the compiler that this appropriate biblio-graphic, series will ultimately be extended to nomenclatural and distrib-utional include the entire world fauna. information, as well as host associations. Primary type data are Calder, A. N. (1996). Siphonaptera. also included. Discounting the few pp. 136-181, 185-197 (App. IV), 222- recognized subspecies, the 34 genera 226 (Index). In: A. Wells (ed.) and 81 species are distributed as Zoological Catalogue of Australia. follows: Volume 28. Neuroptera, Strepsiptera, Mecoptera, Siphonaptera. Melbourne : Ceratophyllidae 3 : 4 (3) CSIRO Publishing, Australia ISBN 0- Hystrichopsyllidae 2 : 2 643-05801-X. P.O.Box 1139 [Oxford Ischnopsyllidae 4 : 7 Street] Leptopsyllidae 1 : 1 (1) Collingwood, Victoria 3066, Aust-ralia). Macropsyllidae 2 : 2 <[email protected]> Pulicidae 5 : 20 (7): Pygiopsyllidae 14 : 33 Over the years the scientific Rhopalopsyllidae 1 : 4 community has come to expect a level Stephanocircidae 2 : 8 of excellence from the Common-wealth Scientific & Industrial Res-earch Eleven of these species are deemed Organization and its associates seldom adventive by this reviewer and these approximated in other parts of the are indicated by the numbers in world. The Zoological Catal-ogue of parentheses after the Ceratophyl-lidae, Australia, compiled under the auspices Leptopsyllidae and Pulicidae. of the Australian Biological Resources Appendix IV contains a listing of the Study and published by the CSIRO host-flea associations. Ignoring the admirably continues this tradition. single species taken from a snake as Although four insect orders are included an accidental association, 41 avian and in Volume 28, the following review 121 mammalian taxa are listed as applies only to the chapter on the hosts of Australian fleas. There is also Siphonaptera by Andrew A. Calder. a separate index for the Siphonaptera, FLEA NEWS 614 as there is for the three other insect Smit, 1979; tunneyi Mardon & Dunnet, orders included in this volume. 1972, and zethi (Rothschild, 1904). Certainly the most detailed treat- In summary, this is a most useful ment of the Australian flea fauna is treatment of the flea fauna, both that of Dunnet and Mardon (1974) because of its currency and its format. (Australian Journal of Zoology. The author, although not a specialist in Supplementary Series No. 30: 1-273) fleas, has done an excellent job of and workers seeking identification of reviewing the pertinent literature and Australian collections must still refer nomen-clature in the order and should to it for the necessary keys. However, be highly commended for his accom- in the intervening 22 years a few no- plishment. menclatural changes have been made and these may be easily traced in the Segerman, J. (1995). Siphonaptera present volume. They are described of southern Africa. Handbook for below, with the under-standing that the the identification of fleas. comments apply only to the Australian Publications of the South African members of the genera. Institute for Medic-al Research No. 57. Ceratophyllidae 264 pp. ISBN No. 1-874813-06-X. Although Dunnet & Mardon (1974) Natal Witness Printing & Publishing mention Glaciopsyllus antarcticus Company. (price not known). SAIMR, Smit & Dunnet, 1962, it is not included Hospital Street, P.O.Box 1038, in their key to the genera. Johannesburg 2000, South Africa. Ischnopsyllidae Serendipsylla marshalli Smit, It has been slightly over 35 years since 1975, was unknown in 1974.
Recommended publications
  • NEWS 84June 2019
    flea NEWS 84 June 2019 http://esanetworks.org/ FLEA NEWS is a twice-yearly newsletter about fleas (Siphonaptera). Recipients are urged to check any citations given here before including them in publications. Many of our sources are abstracting journals and current literature sources, and citations have not necessarily been checked for accuracy or consistent formatting. Recipients are urged to contribute items of interest to the profession for inclusion herein, including: Flea research citations from journals that are not indexed, Announcements and Requests for material, Contact information for a Directory of Siphonapterists (name, mailing address, email address, and areas of interest - Systematics, Ecology, Control, etc.), Abstracts of research planned or in progress, Book and Literature Reviews, Biography, Hypotheses, and Anecdotes. Send to: R. L. Bossard, Ph.D. Editor, Flea News [email protected] Organizers of the Flea News Network are Drs. R. L. Bossard and N. C. Hinkle. N. C. Hinkle, Ph.D. Dept. of Entomology Univ. of Georgia Athens GA 30602-2603 USA [email protected] (706) 583-8043 Assistant Editor J. R. Kucera, M.S. Contents Editorial Announcements Featured research Directory of Siphonapterists Editorial Dear Flea News Reader, The current Flea News is abbreviated so the Siphonaptera Literature list can appear in its entirety in the next Flea News. The change will consolidate all of 2019 citations in one Flea News. From The Lancet (Kneebone, 2019): "A collaboration with Erica McAlister, an entomologist at the Natural History Museum in London, UK, has revealed interesting parallels. As Senior Curator for Diptera and Siphonaptera, Erica is responsible for over a million two-winged insects in the museum's collection and she is a master at identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 41, 2000
    BAT RESEARCH NEWS Volume 41 : No. 1 Spring 2000 I I BAT RESEARCH NEWS Volume 41: Numbers 1–4 2000 Original Issues Compiled by Dr. G. Roy Horst, Publisher and Managing Editor of Bat Research News, 2000. Copyright 2011 Bat Research News. All rights reserved. This material is protected by copyright and may not be reproduced, transmitted, posted on a Web site or a listserve, or disseminated in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Publisher, Dr. Margaret A. Griffiths. The material is for individual use only. Bat Research News is ISSN # 0005-6227. BAT RESEARCH NEWS Volume41 Spring 2000 Numberl Contents Resolution on Rabies Exposure Merlin Tuttle and Thomas Griffiths o o o o eo o o o • o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o 0 o o o 1 E - Mail Directory - 2000 Compiled by Roy Horst •••• 0 ...................... 0 ••••••••••••••••••••••• 2 ,t:.'. Recent Literature Compiled by :Margaret Griffiths . : ....••... •"r''• ..., .... >.•••••• , ••••• • ••< ...... 19 ,.!,..j,..,' ""o: ,II ,' f 'lf.,·,,- .,'b'l: ,~··.,., lfl!t • 0'( Titles Presented at the 7th Bat Researc:b Confei'ebee~;Moscow :i'\prill4-16~ '1999,., ..,, ~ .• , ' ' • I"',.., .. ' ""!' ,. Compiled by Roy Horst .. : .......... ~ ... ~· ....... : :· ,"'·~ .• ~:• .... ; •. ,·~ •.•, .. , ........ 22 ·.t.'t, J .,•• ~~ Letters to the Editor 26 I ••• 0 ••••• 0 •••••••••••• 0 ••••••• 0. 0. 0 0 ••••••• 0 •• 0. 0 •••••••• 0 ••••••••• 30 News . " Future Meetings, Conferences and Symposium ..................... ~ ..,•'.: .. ,. ·..; .... 31 Front Cover The illustration of Rhinolophus ferrumequinum on the front cover of this issue is by Philippe Penicaud . from his very handsome series of drawings representing the bats of France.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What Can We Predict About the Spread of Vector-Borne Zoonotic Diseases?
    2010 Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What can we predict about the spread of vector-borne zoonotic diseases? Ph.D. Dissertation Megan M. Friggens School of Forestry I I I \, l " FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? by Megan M. Friggens A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forest Science Northern Arizona University May 2010 ?Jii@~-~-u-_- Robert R. Parmenter, Ph. D. ~",l(*~ l.~ Paulette L. Ford, Ph. D. --=z:r-J'l1jU~ David M. Wagner, Ph. D. ABSTRACT FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? MEGAN M. FRIGGENS Vector-borne diseases of humans and wildlife are experiencing resurgence across the globe. I examine the dynamics of flea borne diseases through a comparative analysis of flea literature and analyses of field data collected from three sites in New Mexico: The Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, the Sandia Mountains and the Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP). My objectives were to use these analyses to better predict and manage for the spread of diseases such as plague (Yersinia pestis). To assess the impact of anthropogenic disturbance on flea communities, I compiled and analyzed data from 63 published empirical studies. Anthropogenic disturbance is associated with conditions conducive to increased transmission of flea-borne diseases. Most measures of flea infestation increased with increasing disturbance or peaked at intermediate levels of disturbance. Future trends of habitat and climate change will probably favor the spread of flea-borne disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleas and Flea-Borne Diseases
    International Journal of Infectious Diseases 14 (2010) e667–e676 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Infectious Diseases journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijid Review Fleas and flea-borne diseases Idir Bitam a, Katharina Dittmar b, Philippe Parola a, Michael F. Whiting c, Didier Raoult a,* a Unite´ de Recherche en Maladies Infectieuses Tropicales Emergentes, CNRS-IRD UMR 6236, Faculte´ de Me´decine, Universite´ de la Me´diterrane´e, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 5, France b Department of Biological Sciences, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA c Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA ARTICLE INFO SUMMARY Article history: Flea-borne infections are emerging or re-emerging throughout the world, and their incidence is on the Received 3 February 2009 rise. Furthermore, their distribution and that of their vectors is shifting and expanding. This publication Received in revised form 2 June 2009 reviews general flea biology and the distribution of the flea-borne diseases of public health importance Accepted 4 November 2009 throughout the world, their principal flea vectors, and the extent of their public health burden. Such an Corresponding Editor: William Cameron, overall review is necessary to understand the importance of this group of infections and the resources Ottawa, Canada that must be allocated to their control by public health authorities to ensure their timely diagnosis and treatment. Keywords: ß 2010 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Flea Siphonaptera Plague Yersinia pestis Rickettsia Bartonella Introduction to 16 families and 238 genera have been described, but only a minority is synanthropic, that is they live in close association with The past decades have seen a dramatic change in the geographic humans (Table 1).4,5 and host ranges of many vector-borne pathogens, and their diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Flea NEWS 56 Department of Entomology Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 50, June, 1995; No
    flea NEWS 56 Department of Entomology Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 50, June, 1995; No. 51, December, 1995; No. 52, June, 1996, No. 53, December, Table of Contents 1996; No. 54, June, 1997, 55, January, 1998 and this number. Literature..............................662 Mailing List Changes .............668 ❊❄❊❄❊❄❊ Miscellanea...........................660 MISCELLANEA Flea News (Online) has now been FLEA NEWS is a biannual newsletter assigned the following International devoted to matters involving insects Standard Serial Number: ISSN 1089- belonging to the order Siphonaptera (fleas) 7631 and related subjects. It is compiled and distributed free of charge by Robert E. Lewis ❖❏❖❏❖❏❖ <[email protected]> in cooperation with the Department of Entomology at Iowa State Dr. Glen Chilton of the Department University, Ames, IA, and a grant in aid of Biology, St. Mary's College, Calg- from Wellmark International. ary, Alberta, T2S 2N5, Canada, rec- Flea News is mainly bibliographic in nature. Many of the sources are abstracting ently called my attention to the Birds journals and title pages and not all citations of North America accounts published have been checked for completeness or jointly by the American Ornithol- accuracy. Additional information will be ogists' Union and the Academy of provided upon written or e-mail request. Natural Sciences, Philadelphia. To Further, recipients are urged to contribute date 320 accounts have been publish- items of interest to the professon for ed and the following titles include inclusion herein. information on fleas: This newsletter is now available in 7. Northern Mockingbird electronic format. The preferred method of 11. Tree Swallow accessing the electronic version is through the 12.
    [Show full text]
  • BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (Takım Düzeyinde)
    BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (TAKIM DÜZEYİNDE) GÖKHAN AYDIN 2016 Editör : Gökhan AYDIN Dizgi : Ziya ÖNCÜ ISBN : 978-605-87432-3-6 Böceklerin Sınıflandırılması isimli eğitim amaçlı hazırlanan bilgisayar programı için lütfen aşağıda verilen linki tıklayarak programı ücretsiz olarak bilgisayarınıza yükleyin. http://atabeymyo.sdu.edu.tr/assets/uploads/sites/76/files/siniflama-05102016.exe Eğitim Amaçlı Bilgisayar Programı ISBN: 978-605-87432-2-9 İçindekiler İçindekiler i Önsöz vi 1. Protura - Coneheads 1 1.1 Özellikleri 1 1.2 Ekonomik Önemi 2 1.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 2 2. Collembola - Springtails 3 2.1 Özellikleri 3 2.2 Ekonomik Önemi 4 2.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 4 3. Thysanura - Silverfish 6 3.1 Özellikleri 6 3.2 Ekonomik Önemi 7 3.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 7 4. Microcoryphia - Bristletails 8 4.1 Özellikleri 8 4.2 Ekonomik Önemi 9 5. Diplura 10 5.1 Özellikleri 10 5.2 Ekonomik Önemi 10 5.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 11 6. Plocoptera – Stoneflies 12 6.1 Özellikleri 12 6.2 Ekonomik Önemi 12 6.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 13 7. Embioptera - webspinners 14 7.1 Özellikleri 15 7.2 Ekonomik Önemi 15 7.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 15 8. Orthoptera–Grasshoppers, Crickets 16 8.1 Özellikleri 16 8.2 Ekonomik Önemi 16 8.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 17 i 9. Phasmida - Walkingsticks 20 9.1 Özellikleri 20 9.2 Ekonomik Önemi 21 9.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 21 10. Dermaptera - Earwigs 23 10.1 Özellikleri 23 10.2 Ekonomik Önemi 24 10.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 24 11. Zoraptera 25 11.1 Özellikleri 25 11.2 Ekonomik Önemi 25 11.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 26 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Hastings Slide Collection3
    HASTINGS NATURAL HISTORY RESERVATION SLIDE COLLECTION 1 ORDER FAMILY GENUS SPECIES SUBSPECIES AUTHOR DATE # SLIDES COMMENTS/CORRECTIONS Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Diamanus montanus Baker 1895 221 currently Oropsylla (Diamanus) montana Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Diamanus spp. 1 currently Oropsylla (Diamanus) spp. Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella ignota acuta Stewart 1940 402 syn. of F. ignota franciscana (Roths.) Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella ignota (Baker) 1895 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella spp. 15 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Malaraeus spp. 1 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Malaraeus telchinum Rothschild 1905 491 M. telchinus Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus fornacis Jordan 1937 57 currently Eumolpianus fornacis Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus wagneri (Baker) 1904 131 currently Aetheca wagneri Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus wagneri ophidius Jordan 1929 2 syn. of Aetheca wagneri Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Opisodasys nesiotus Augustson 1941 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas sexdentatus (Baker) 1904 134 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas sexdentatus nevadensis (Jordan) 1929 15 syn. of Orchopeas agilis (Baker) Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas spp. 8 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas latens (Jordan) 1925 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas leucopus (Baker) 1904 2 Siphonaptera Ctenophthalmidae Anomiopsyllus falsicalifornicus C. Fox 1919 3 Siphonaptera Ctenophthalmidae Anomiopsyllus congruens Stewart 1940 96 incl. 38 Paratypes; syn. of A. falsicalifornicus Siphonaptera
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Fleas (Siphonaptera) in Iran: Diversity, Host Range, and Medical Importance
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The Fleas (Siphonaptera) in Iran: Diversity, Host Range, and Medical Importance Naseh Maleki-Ravasan1, Samaneh Solhjouy-Fard2,3, Jean-Claude Beaucournu4, Anne Laudisoit5,6,7, Ehsan Mostafavi2,3* 1 Malaria and Vector Research Group, Biotechnology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran, 2 Research Centre for Emerging and Reemerging infectious diseases, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Akanlu, Kabudar Ahang, Hamadan, Iran, 3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pasteur institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran, 4 University of Rennes, France Faculty of Medicine, and Western Insitute of Parasitology, Rennes, France, 5 Evolutionary Biology group, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 6 School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 7 CIFOR, Jalan Cifor, Situ Gede, Sindang Barang, Bogor Bar., Jawa Barat, Indonesia * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 Background Flea-borne diseases have a wide distribution in the world. Studies on the identity, abun- dance, distribution and seasonality of the potential vectors of pathogenic agents (e.g. Yersi- OPEN ACCESS nia pestis, Francisella tularensis, and Rickettsia felis) are necessary tools for controlling Citation: Maleki-Ravasan N, Solhjouy-Fard S, and preventing such diseases outbreaks. The improvements of diagnostic tools are partly Beaucournu J-C, Laudisoit A, Mostafavi E (2017) The Fleas (Siphonaptera) in Iran: Diversity, Host responsible for an easier detection of otherwise unnoticed agents in the ectoparasitic fauna Range, and Medical Importance. PLoS Negl Trop and as such a good taxonomical knowledge of the potential vectors is crucial. The aims of Dis 11(1): e0005260. doi:10.1371/journal. this study were to make an exhaustive inventory of the literature on the fleas (Siphonaptera) pntd.0005260 and range of associated hosts in Iran, present their known distribution, and discuss their Editor: Pamela L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleas (Siphonaptera) Are Cretaceous, and Evolved with Theria
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/014308; this version posted January 24, 2015. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Fleas (Siphonaptera) are Cretaceous, and Evolved with Theria Qiyun Zhu1, Michael Hastriter2, Michael Whiting2, 3, Katharina Dittmar1, 4* Jan. 23, 2015 Abstract: Fleas (order Siphonaptera) are highly-specialized, diverse blood-feeding ectoparasites of mammals and birds with an enigmatic evolutionary history and obscure origin. We here present a molecular phylogenetic study based on a compre- hensive taxon sampling of 259 flea taxa, representing 16 of the 18 extant families of this order. A Bayesian phylogenetic tree with strong nodal support was recovered, consisting of seven sequentially derived lineages with Macropsyllidae at the base and Stephanocircidae as the second basal group. Divergence times of flea lineages were estimated based on fossil records and host specific associations to bats (Chiroptera), showing that the common ancestor of extant Siphonaptera split from its clos- est mecopteran sister group in the Early Cretaceous and basal lineages diversified during the Late Cretaceous. However, most of the intraordinal divergence into families took place after the K-Pg boundary. Ancestral states of host association and bioge- ographical distribution were reconstructed, suggesting with high likelihood that fleas originated in the southern continents (Gondwana) and migrated from South America to their extant distributions in a relatively short time frame. Theria (placental mammals and marsupials) represent the most likely ancestral host group of extant Siphonaptera, with marsupials occupying a more important role than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Fleas (Siphonaptera: Ctenophthalmidae
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: 383-390, 2014 Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: 383-390, 2014 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.42071 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.42071383 New records of fleas (Siphonaptera: Ctenophthalmidae: Rhopalopsyllidae and Stephanocircidae) from Argentinean Patagonia, with remarks on the morphology of Agastopsylla boxi and Tiarapsylla argentina Nuevos registros de pulgas (Siphonaptera: Ctenophthalmidae: Rhopalopsyllidae y Stephanocircidae) de la Patagonia argentina, con comentarios sobre la morfología de Agastopsylla boxi y Tiarapsylla argentina Juliana Sánchez and Marcela Lareschi Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores, Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Bv. 120 s/n e/ Av. 60 y calle 61, 1900 La Plata, Argentina. [email protected] Abstract. A high diversity of fleas parasitizing sigmodontine rodents has been mentioned for Patagonia. Several of these fleas have been described having their type localities in the region, including several endemic taxa. For many species, however, the original descriptions are brief and there are no new morphological contributions. In the present study we report 8 species of fleas (Ctenophthalmidae, Rhopalopsyllidae and Stephanocircidae) parasitizing sigmodontine rodents from Argentinean Patagonia. Nineteen new parasite–host associations are reported and all studied fleas extend their known geographic range. Among them, Tiarapsylla argentina is mentioned for the first time for Patagonia; Craneopsylla minerva, Sphinctopsylla ares, Polygenis (P.) platensis and Polygenis (P.) rimatus are registered for the first time for Chubut, and Agastopsylla boxi, Ectinorus (E.) ixanus and Ectinorus (E.) hapalus for Santa Cruz, extending the southernmost limit of their geographical distribution. Also, for A. boxi and T.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity from Caves and Other Subterranean Habitats of Georgia, USA
    Kirk S. Zigler, Matthew L. Niemiller, Charles D.R. Stephen, Breanne N. Ayala, Marc A. Milne, Nicholas S. Gladstone, Annette S. Engel, John B. Jensen, Carlos D. Camp, James C. Ozier, and Alan Cressler. Biodiversity from caves and other subterranean habitats of Georgia, USA. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 82, no. 2, p. 125-167. DOI:10.4311/2019LSC0125 BIODIVERSITY FROM CAVES AND OTHER SUBTERRANEAN HABITATS OF GEORGIA, USA Kirk S. Zigler1C, Matthew L. Niemiller2, Charles D.R. Stephen3, Breanne N. Ayala1, Marc A. Milne4, Nicholas S. Gladstone5, Annette S. Engel6, John B. Jensen7, Carlos D. Camp8, James C. Ozier9, and Alan Cressler10 Abstract We provide an annotated checklist of species recorded from caves and other subterranean habitats in the state of Georgia, USA. We report 281 species (228 invertebrates and 53 vertebrates), including 51 troglobionts (cave-obligate species), from more than 150 sites (caves, springs, and wells). Endemism is high; of the troglobionts, 17 (33 % of those known from the state) are endemic to Georgia and seven (14 %) are known from a single cave. We identified three biogeographic clusters of troglobionts. Two clusters are located in the northwestern part of the state, west of Lookout Mountain in Lookout Valley and east of Lookout Mountain in the Valley and Ridge. In addition, there is a group of tro- globionts found only in the southwestern corner of the state and associated with the Upper Floridan Aquifer. At least two dozen potentially undescribed species have been collected from caves; clarifying the taxonomic status of these organisms would improve our understanding of cave biodiversity in the state.
    [Show full text]