DOCSLIB.ORG

Restoring Streams for Freshwater Fish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Restoring Streams for Freshwater Fish Restoring streams for freshwater fish Jody Richardson Ian Jowett NIWA Science & Technology Series No. 53 2005 Published by NIWA Wellington 2005 Edited and produced by Science Communication, NIWA Private Bag 14901, Wellington, New Zealand ISSN 1173-0382 ISBN 0-478-23272-1 © NIWA 2005 Citation: Richardson, J.; Jowett, I.G. (2005). Restoring streams for freshwater fish. NIWA Science and Technology Series No. 53. 55 p. Cover photograph: Restored section of Okeover Stream, Christchurch, by Bob Spigel. The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research is New Zealand’s leading provider of atmospheric, marine, and freshwater science Visit NIWA’s website at http://www.niwa.co.nz Contents Abstract.....................................................................................................................5 Introduction...............................................................................................................5 Types of fish communities........................................................................................7 Data selection and analysis ...................................................................................7 Results...................................................................................................................9 River morphology ...................................................................................................12 River classification..............................................................................................12 Gravel-bed.......................................................................................................12 Spring-/lake-fed ..............................................................................................13 Bush streams ...................................................................................................13 Low gradient ...................................................................................................13 Implications for restoration.................................................................................14 Community requirements........................................................................................14 Shortjaw kokopu community..............................................................................15 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................15 Water quality...................................................................................................15 Banded kokopu community ................................................................................17 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................17 Water quality...................................................................................................17 Redfin bully community .....................................................................................19 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................19 Water quality...................................................................................................19 Cran’s bully community .....................................................................................20 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................21 Water quality...................................................................................................21 Shortfin eel community.......................................................................................22 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................22 Water quality...................................................................................................24 Inanga community ..............................................................................................24 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................25 Water quality...................................................................................................25 Torrentfish community .......................................................................................26 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................26 Water quality...................................................................................................27 Upland bully community ....................................................................................29 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................29 Water quality...................................................................................................29 Brown trout community......................................................................................30 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................30 Water quality...................................................................................................32 Rainbow trout communities................................................................................32 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................32 Water quality...................................................................................................32 Koaro communities.............................................................................................34 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................34 Water quality...................................................................................................34 Longfin eel community.......................................................................................35 Location and physical attributes .....................................................................35 Water quality...................................................................................................37 Restoration activities...............................................................................................37 Physical attributes ...............................................................................................39 Location and morphology ...............................................................................39 Flow regime ................................................................................................40 Sediment supply..........................................................................................41 Gradient.......................................................................................................41 Bank and bed material.................................................................................42 Access .............................................................................................................42 Cover...............................................................................................................44 Catchment land use.........................................................................................46 Water quality.......................................................................................................46 Water temperature...........................................................................................47 Dissolved oxygen and pH ...............................................................................47 Suspended sediment........................................................................................47 Ammonia and other chemical pollutants ........................................................48 Lessons from an active project ...............................................................................48 Summary.................................................................................................................51 Acknowledgments...................................................................................................51 References...............................................................................................................51 Abstract Richardson, J.; Jowett, I.G. (2005). Restoring streams for freshwater fish. NIWA Science and Technology Series No. 53. 55 p. This document provides an overview of factors to consider when restoring streams for freshwater fish communities. The fish community present in a stream depends on the location and physical characteristics of that stream. In some streams, environmental values might be enhanced by increasing species diversity or by increasing fish numbers. This might be achieved by habitat improvement or by excluding unwanted species. Twelve commonly occurring fish communities were identified using selected records from the New Zealand freshwater fish database. The data selection criteria meant that the analysis applied only to communities that occur in flowing water habitats. Relationships between the fish communities and various environmental variables, e.g., the site location, were examined to determine which variables were associated with each community. This allowed us to build models that could be used to predict the fish community in a particular stream from the physical attributes of that stream. Our analysis showed that site location and stream morphology were two of the most important determinants of fish community composition.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critical Habitat for Canterbury Freshwater Fish, Kōura/Kēkēwai and Kākahi
    CRITICAL HABITAT FOR CANTERBURY FRESHWATER FISH, KŌURA/KĒKĒWAI AND KĀKAHI REPORT PREPARED FOR CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL BY RICHARD ALLIBONE WATERWAYS CONSULTING REPORT NUMBER: 55-2018 AND DUNCAN GRAY CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL DATE: DECEMBER 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aquatic habitat in Canterbury supports a range of native freshwater fish and the mega macroinvertebrates kōura/kēkēwai (crayfish) and kākahi (mussel). Loss of habitat, barriers to fish passage, water quality and water quantity issues present management challenges when we seek to protect this freshwater fauna while providing for human use. Water plans in Canterbury are intended to set rules for the use of water, the quality of water in aquatic systems and activities that occur within and adjacent to aquatic areas. To inform the planning and resource consent processes, information on the distribution of species and their critical habitat requirements can be used to provide for their protection. This report assesses the conservation status and distributions of indigenous freshwater fish, kēkēwai and kākahi in the Canterbury region. The report identifies the geographic distribution of these species and provides information on the critical habitat requirements of these species and/or populations. Water Ways Consulting Ltd Critical habitats for Canterbury aquatic fauna Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Monitoring and Research for Improved Resilience on Argos Farms
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lincoln University Research Archive Environment Objective Rationale 1 of 136 ARGOS Working Paper No. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND RESEARCH FOR IMPROVED RESILIENCE ON ARGOS FARMS Henrik Moller, Alex Wearing, Andrea Pearson, Chris Perley, David Steven, Grant Blackwell, Jeff Reid and Marion Johnson University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand June 2005 Environment Objective Rationale EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report outlines a rationale for proposed environmental monitoring on 136 farms participating in the Agriculture Research Group on Sustainability (ARGOS) project. A transdisciplinary research team of around 20 researchers, including sociologists, economists, farm management experts and ecologists will assess the sustainability and socio-ecological resilience of farms and orchards participating in organic, Integrated Management (IM), conventional farming systems and Mori farming systems. The farming sectors represented range from (i) high-input:high- output agriculture for dairy and kiwifruit production (mainly in North Island New Zealand), through (ii) medium-input:medium-output sheep and beef farming on the plains or rolling low hill country of South Island, to (iii) very low-input-low-output sheep/beef farming in the South Island High Country. A parallel study of Mori land use and sustainable development amongst Ngi Tahu Rnanga will include a variety of other farming approaches. A meta-analysis over all farm sectors and farming systems will attempt to identify key drivers of change and barriers to improved resilience. Researchers will monitor social, economic and environmental changes on farms over the next 20 to 30 years as part of an ‘independent assessor’ role, but they will also seek to help the participating farmers improve the sustainability and resilience of their enterprise by acting as ‘involved assistors’.
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovering the Species in Community-Wide Predictive Modeling
    Ecological Applications, 16(4), 2006, pp. 1449–1460 Ó 2006 by the the Ecological Society of America REDISCOVERING THE SPECIES IN COMMUNITY-WIDE PREDICTIVE MODELING 1,3 2 2 JULIAN D. OLDEN, MICHAEL K. JOY, AND RUSSELL G. DEATH 1Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 680 N. Park Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 USA 2Institute of Natural Resources–Ecology, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand Abstract. Broadening the scope of conservation efforts to protect entire communities provides several advantages over the current species-specific focus, yet ecologists have been hampered by the fact that predictive modeling of multiple species is not directly amenable to traditional statistical approaches. Perhaps the greatest hurdle in community-wide modeling is that communities are composed of both co-occurring groups of species and species arranged independently along environmental gradients. Therefore, commonly used ‘‘short-cut’’ methods such as the modeling of so-called ‘‘assemblage types’’ are problematic. Our study demonstrates the utility of a multiresponse artificial neural network (MANN) to model entire community membership in an integrative yet species-specific manner. We compare MANN to two traditional approaches used to predict community composition: (1) a species-by-species approach using logistic regression analysis (LOG) and (2) a ‘‘classification-then-modeling’’ approach in which sites are classified into assemblage ‘‘types’’ (here we used two-way indicator species analysis and multiple discriminant analysis [MDA]). For freshwater fish assemblages of the North Island, New Zealand, we found that the MANN outperformed all other methods for predicting community composition based on multiscaled descriptors of the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Scales of Biological Variability in New Zealand Streams
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Multiple scales of biological variability in New Zealand streams A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand. Withanage Thushantha Sriyan Jayasuriya 2016 ii General Abstract Stream fish communities in Taranaki, New Zealand, were studied for the patterns and drivers of their spatial ecology. The study was focused on three main themes: a) complementarity between geography and landuse in driving regional distribution patterns of stream fish, b) the impact of agriculture on community composition, structure and variability of fish and invertebrates, and c) concordance among environmental distance and community dissimilarities of stream fish and invertebrates. Stream sampling and data collection for fish was conducted at regional scale using 96 sites distributed in the protected forest (44 sites) of Egmont National Park in Taranaki, and in surrounding farmlands (52 sites). Local scale sampling for fish and invertebrates was carried out at 15 stream sites in pasture (8 sites) and in adjacent forest (7 sites). Environmental data of geography, landuse and local habitat description were also gathered concurrently to biological sampling. The regional scale survey reported fifteen fish species, dominated by longfin eels (Anguilla dieffenbachia), redfin bullies (Gobiomorphus huttoni) and koaro (Galaxias brevipinnis), while 12 fish species and 69 different invertebrate taxa were recorded from the 15 sites at local scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish Taxonomic Workshop Focussing on New Zealand Non- Migratory Galaxias Taxonomic Issues
    Freshwater fish taxonomic workshop Focussing on New Zealand non- migratory galaxias taxonomic issues Proceedings compiled by: Sjaan Bowie, Lan Pham, Nicholas Dunn, Richard Allibone, and Shannan Crow How to cite this document: Bowie, S. Pham, L, Dunn, N, Allibone, R, & Crow, S. (Eds) 2014: Freshwater fish taxonomic workshop focussing on New Zealand non-migratory galaxias taxonomic issues. Proceedings of a workshop, Dunedin 14th May 2013. Unpublished DOC publication. Christchurch. © Copyright May 2014, New Zealand Department of Conservation DOCDM-1205404 In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4 2. Overview of genetic and morphological data used for current non- migratory galaxias groupings .................................................................................... 5 2.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Workshop group conclusion ................................................................................. 7 2.3 Non-migratory galaxias data management ........................................................... 7 3. Groupings of non-migratory Galaxias ....................................................................... 8 3.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 8 3.2 New Zealand
    [Show full text]
  • Lethal Turbidity Levels for Common Fish and Invertebrates in Auckland
    Lethal Turbidity Levels for Common Fish and Invertebrates in Auckland Streams June 2002 TP337 Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication No. 337, 2002 ISSN 1175-205X" ISBN -13 : 978-1-877416-78-1 ISBN -10 : 1877416-78-9 Printed on recycled paper Lethal turbidity levels for common freshwater fish and invertebrates in Auckland streams D. K. Rowe A. M. Suren M. Martin J. P. Smith B. Smith E. Williams Prepared for Auckland Regional Council Information contained within this report should not be used without the prior consent of the client NIWA Client Report: ARC02283 June 2002 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Gate 10, Silverdale Road, Hamilton P O Box 11115, Hamilton, New Zealand Phone +64-7-856 7026, Fax +64-7-856 0151 www.niwa.co.nz Acknowledgements We would like to thank John Maxted (and his staff) for supplying the clay used for testing, as well as for his guidance on invertebrate selection and important aspects of the study’s design. Recommended Citation: Rowe, D.K., et. al. (2002). Lethal turbidity levels for common freshwater fish and invertebrates in Auckland streams. Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication Number 337. 37 p. CONTENTS 1.1.1. Executive Summary 111 2.2.2. Introduction 222 3.3.3. Sediment Characterisation 444 4.4.4. Effects Of Turbidity On Fish 666 4.1 Fish selection, collection and acclimation 6 4.2 Experimental methods 6 4.3 Data analysis 9 4.4 Results 10 4.5 Discussion 19 5.5.5. Effects of Turbidity on InvInvertebratesertebrates 222222 5.1 Choice of invertebrate species 22 5.2 Experimental methods 23 5.3 Results 26 5.4 Discussion 28 666 Conclusions 313131 777 Recommendations 323232 888 References 333333 Reviewed by: Approved for release by: Mike Scarsbrook Jody Richardson TP 337 - Lethal Turbidity Levels For Common Freshwater Fish and Invertebrates in Auckland Streams 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parasite Release Hypothesis and the Success of Invasive Fish in New Zealand
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. The parasite release hypothesis and the success of invasive fish in New Zealand A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Science at The University of Waikato by Keshi Zhang The University of Waikato 2012 Abstract Non-indigenous species are commonly released from their native enemies, including parasites, when they are introduced into new geographical areas. This has been referred to as the enemy release hypothesis and more strictly as the parasite release hypothesis. The loss of parasites is commonly inferred to explain the invasiveness of non-indigenous species. I examined parasite release in New Zealand non-indigenous freshwater fishes. A literature review was undertaken in order to collate lists of the known parasite fauna of 20 New Zealand non-indigenous freshwater fish species.
    [Show full text]
  • EARLY LIFE HISTORY of CAPTIVE-REARED GOBIOMORPHUS BASALIS (OSTEICHTHYES: ELEOTRIDAE) by David J. Riddell SUMMARY a Method for Rr
    TANE 28,1982 EARLY LIFE HISTORY OF CAPTIVE-REARED GOBIOMORPHUS BASALIS (OSTEICHTHYES: ELEOTRIDAE) by David J. Riddell Gordonton Road, R.D.I., Taupiri SUMMARY A method for rrearing Cran's bully (Gobiomorphus basalis) in captivity is outlined. The development of this species throughout the first four weeks after hatching is described, with illustrations. Cran's bully is seen to be more advanced at hatching than related species, though the rapid development observed may be due to artificial factors such as the temperature at which the aquarium was kept and the ready availability of food. INTRODUCTION Cran's bully is a common, though poorly-known species of native freshwater fish found primarily in rocky, bush-clad streams throughout the North Island of New Zealand, but known also from lakes in the Gisborne area, and from tarns near Molesworth in the South Island (McDowall 1978). It also occurs in Western Springs, Auckland (personal observation). Little is known of the reproductive biology of this species except that the eggs are quite large, and the young remain in fresh• water, hiding in the shallows at the water's edge. Spawning behaviour has been described by L.W. Spooner (McDowall 1978) although no details of the subsequent development of the eggs are given. MATERIALS AND METHODS Several specimens of Cran's bully, collected from Western Springs and the Waitakere Stream, together with several other species of native fresh-water fish were kept in an unheated aquarium measuring 1 240 x 440 x 440 mm. They were fed primarily on finely chopped earthworms, with occasional feedings of mosquito larvae, Daphnia, chopped beef or fish, and small Gambusia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Exotic Salmonids on Native Host-Parasite Dynamics
    The influence of exotic salmonids on native host-parasite dynamics Rachel A. Paterson A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand December 2010 ii Summary Native parasite acquisition provides introduced species with the potential to modify native host-parasite dynamics by acting as parasite reservoirs (with the ‘spillback’ of infection increasing the parasite burdens of native hosts) or sinks (with the ‘dilution’ of infection decreasing the parasite burdens of native hosts) of infection. Exotic salmonids are frequently shown to acquire native parasites; however, as research into the threats posed by exotic salmonids has largely focused on predation and competition, threats posed by shared native parasites are poorly understood. I used a multiple-pronged approach combining field observations, experimental infections and dynamic population modelling to investigate whether native parasite acquisition by exotic salmonids alters host-parasite dynamics in native fish populations from streams and lakes in New Zealand and Argentina. I also used a meta-analysis approach to investigate which trait(s) influence native parasite acquisition by exotic freshwater fish. My research demonstrated that two key factors strongly influence whether the dynamics of native parasites will be affected by exotic fish. On one hand, the competency of exotic fish for native parasites is an important determinant of whether native parasite populations are likely to increase or decrease. On the other hand, the relative abundance of the exotic species determines whether its competency for a native parasite will actually translate into altered native host-parasite dynamics, with highly abundant exotic species more likely to induce changes in native parasite dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations for Restoration of Native Freshwater Fish Populations in the Parangarahu Lakes
    Considerations for restoration of native freshwater fish populations in the Parangarahu Lakes Longfin eel (Anguilla dieffenbachii). Prepared for Roopu Tiaki By Amber McEwan (BSc, MSc) Riverscapes Freshwater Ecology 1 October 2013 1. Executive Summary........................................................................................................................4 2. Background.....................................................................................................................................4 3. Aim and scope of this report.....................................................................................................7 4. Interviews with key stakeholders..................................................................................................8 4.1 Interview questions.........................................................................................................................8 4.2. Hutt City Council..........................................................................................................................10 4.3. Fisheries Trust...............................................................................................................................11 4.4. Department of Conservation......................................................................................................13 4.5. Greater Wellington Regional Council........................................................................................15 4.6. Port Nicholson Block Settlement Trust....................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Pest Fish List As Part of a Consistent Approach to the Management of Ornamental Fish Throughout Australia
    Ornamental Fish Update – Important Information Regarding Pest Fish July 2017 On 16 December 2016, NSW government introduced further changes to the NSW Pest Fish List as part of a consistent approach to the management of ornamental fish throughout Australia. The NSW Pest Fish List now includes an additional 65 listings that have been nationally agreed as having a high-risk potential. ____________________________________________________________________________________ part 2, schedule 1 of the Biosecurity Regulation Why are there changes to the pest 2017, are subject to notification and must not be fish list? dealt with. Compliance with the NSW Pest Fish List is mandatory by law. In 2006, all Australian governments, in consultation with representatives of the ornamental fish industry, developed a National Strategy called the What should I do with any pest ‘A Strategic Approach to the Management of fish that I have? Ornamental Fish in Australia’. The National A number of ornamental fish species that were Strategy contains seven recommendations for the previously traded by the aquarium industry, management of ornamental fish in Australia, aquarium enthusiasts or hobbyists are now including the development of an agreed National prohibited from being sold and/or being in your Pest Fish List. possession. Pest fish possess characteristics that have the However, NSW DPI is providing a six month potential to trigger, or contribute to, aquatic pest or advisory period, which commenced on 1 March disease outbreaks, impacting upon natural 2017 to provide time for advisory materials to be biodiversity and fisheries resources. Weatherloach distributed and ornamental fish owners to comply and Tilapia are two examples of pest species with the new additions to the NSW pest fish list which, when released, are known to have impacts on our natural aquatic systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish Community Structure in Taranaki: Dams, Diadromy Or Habitat Quality?
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. FRESHWATER FISH COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN TARANAKI: DAMS, DIADROMY OR HABITAT QUALITY? A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ecology At Massey University, Palmerston North By MICHAEL KEVIN JOY 1999 ii ABSTRACT The relationships between freshwater fish community structure and habitat characteristics including dams were examined at 85 sites on 38 waterways draining Mount Taranaki during the summer of 1997 /98. Thirteen native and two exotic fish species were captured. Four groupings were identified based on species composition. The first two were high elevation site groups: one dominated by the diadromous Galaxiids: shortjawed kokopu, banded kokopu and koaro, the other dominated by longfin eels. The third group of sites was a mid-elevation group dominated by redfin bullies and longfin eels while the fourth group was made up of low elevation sites dominated by redfin bullies and shortfin eels. Discriminant analysis revealed that distance from the sea, site elevation and the presence of dams were the environmental variables most strongly associated with fish distribution patterns. Data from the New Zealand freshwater fish database (NZFFD) were used to examine the influence of dams and other environmental variables on the fish communities. The sites listed in the NZFFD as having free migratory access were used as reference sites for the construction of a predictive model of fish community assemblage.
    [Show full text]