DOCSLIB.ORG

The Electron Capture in 163Ho Experiment – Echo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Electron Capture in 163Ho Experiment – Echo Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 226, 1623–1694 (2017) © The Author(s) 2017 THE EUROPEAN DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2017-70071-y PHYSICAL JOURNAL SPECIAL TOPICS Regular Article The electron capture in 163Ho experiment – ECHo L. Gastaldo1,a,K.Blaum2, K. Chrysalidis3,T.DayGoodacre4,A.Domula5, M. Door2,H.Dorrer6,7,8,Ch.E.D¨ullmann6,9,10,K.Eberhardt6,10, S. Eliseev2, C. Enss1, A. Faessler11, P. Filianin2, A. Fleischmann1, D. Fonnesu1, L. Gamer1, R. Haas6, C. Hassel1, D. Hengstler1, J. Jochum12,K.Johnston4, U. Kebschull13, S. Kempf1,T.Kieck3,6,U.K¨oster14,S.Lahiri15, M. Maiti16, F. Mantegazzini1, B. Marsh4, P. Neroutsos13, Yu.N. Novikov2,17,18, P.C.O. Ranitzsch1,b, S. Rothe4, A. Rischka2,A.Saenz19, O. Sander20, F. Schneider3,6, S. Scholl12,R.X.Sch¨ussler2, Ch. Schweiger2, F. Simkovic21,T.Stora4,Z.Sz¨ucs22,A.T¨urler7,8, M. Veinhard4, M. Weber20, M. Wegner1, K. Wendt3, and K. Zuber5 1 Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany 2 Max-Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany 3 Institute for Physics, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany 4 ISOLDE, CERN, Geneve, Switzerland 5 Institute for Nuclear and Particle Physics, TU Dresden, Germany 6 Institute for Nuclear Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany 7 Laboratory of Radiochemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Department Biology and Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland 8 Laboratory of Radiochemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, Freiestrasse 3, Bern, Switzerland 9 GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨ur Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 10 Helmholtz Institute Mainz, Mainz, Germany 11 Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of T¨ubingen,T¨ubingen,Germany 12 Physics Institute, University of T¨ubingen,Germany 13 Goethe-Universit¨at, Frankfurt am Main, Germany 14 Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France 15 Chemical Sciences Division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, 1/AF Bidhannagar, Kolkata, India 16 Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India 17 Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, Russia 18 St.Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia 19 Institut f¨ur Physik, Humboldt-Universit¨atzu Berlin, Berlin, Germany 20 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Data Processing and Electronics, Karlsruhe, Germany 21 Department of Nuclear Physics and Biophysics, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia 22 Institute of Nuclear Research of the H.A.S., Bem ter 18/C, Debrecen, Hungary Received 17 March 2017 Published online 20 June 2017 a e-mail: [email protected] b Present address: Institut f¨urKernphysik, Universit¨at M¨unster,M¨unster, Germany 1624 The European Physical Journal Special Topics Abstract. Neutrinos, and in particular their tiny but non-vanishing masses, can be considered one of the doors towards physics beyond the Standard Model. Precision measurements of the kinematics of weak interactions, in particular of the 3H β-decay and the 163Ho electron capture (EC), represent the only model independent approach to de- termine the absolute scale of neutrino masses. The electron capture in 163Ho experiment, ECHo, is designed to reach sub-eV sensitivity on the electron neutrino mass by means of the analysis of the calorimet- rically measured electron capture spectrum of the nuclide 163Ho. The maximum energy available for this decay, about 2.8 keV, constrains the type of detectors that can be used. Arrays of low temperature metal- lic magnetic calorimeters (MMCs) are being developed to measure the 163Ho EC spectrum with energy resolution below 3 eV FWHM and with a time resolution below 1 μs. To achieve the sub-eV sensitivity on the electron neutrino mass, together with the detector optimization, the availability of large ultra-pure 163Ho samples, the identification and suppression of background sources as well as the precise parame- trization of the 163Ho EC spectrum are of utmost importance. The high-energy resolution 163Ho spectra measured with the first MMC prototypes with ion-implanted 163Ho set the basis for the ECHo exper- iment. We describe the conceptual design of ECHo and motivate the strategies we have adopted to carry on the present medium scale exper- iment, ECHo-1K. In this experiment, the use of 1 kBq 163Ho will allow to reach a neutrino mass sensitivity below 10 eV/c2. We then discuss how the results being achieved in ECHo-1k will guide the design of the next stage of the ECHo experiment, ECHo-1M, where a source of the order of 1 MBq 163Ho embedded in large MMCs arrays will allow to reach sub-eV sensitivity on the electron neutrino mass. 1 Introduction Although the current Standard Model (SM) is a very successful and accurate de- scription of particle physics, we know it is incomplete and an extension is needed to understand the structure of the universe, the hierarchy of masses and to achieve a grand unification. At the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) so far experimental hints to physics beyond the SM are missing and the favored supersymmetric extension of the SM seems to be less likely. The observation of neutrino oscillations [1,2]about20 years ago, establishing that neutrinos must be massive, gives a clear hint of physics beyond the SM. To guide the development of theories beyond the SM, one of the most interesting open questions is therefore the absolute scale of neutrino masses. From neutrino oscillations, only the differences of the masses squared can be ex- tracted [3], but not the absolute values. The determination of the neutrino mass scale is a challenging task due to the smallness of the masses and to the weak interaction with other standard model particles. There exist several approaches which can po- tentially yield this result: the analysis of the visible structures in the universe [4], the observation of neutrinoless double beta decay [5,6] and resonantly enhanced double electron capture [7], the measurement of the time of flight of neutrinos emitted in supernova explosions [8] and the analysis of the kinematics of low energy beta decays and electron capture (EC) processes [9]. In particular, direct kinematical methods allow to perform a model-independent measurement of the electron neutrino and an- tineutrino mass with high sensitivity and low systematic uncertainties. In the past this approach was mainly driven by the investigation of the 3H beta spectrum. KATRIN, the KArlsruhe TRItium Neutrino experiment [10], is designed to either measure the electron-antineutrino mass down to 0.3 eV/c2 or alternatively give an upper limit of The Electron Capture in 163Ho Experiment – ECHo 1625 0.2 eV/c2 with 95% C.L. [9]. These values are approximately a factor of ten smaller than the 95% C.L. upper limits of 2.12 and 2.30 eV/c2 that the two precursor experiments, “Troitsk neutrino mass experiment” and “The Mainz Neutrino mass experiment” respectively, determined [11–13]. Together with KATRIN, two other ex- periments are designed to improve the limit on the electron anti-neutrino mass ana- lyzing the 3H beta-spectrum, these are Project8 [14] and PTOLEMY [15]. The most 2 stringent limit for the electron neutrino mass is mνe < 225 eV/c (95% C.L.) obtained by the analysis of the Internal Bremsstrahlung in Electron Capture (IBEC) spec- trum of 163Ho [16]. The Electron Capture in 163Ho experiment, ECHo, is designed to investigate the electron neutrino mass in the sub-eV region by the analysis of the calorimetrically measured electron capture spectrum of 163Ho. 2 Electron capture in 163Ho and neutrino mass Given the present knowledge, 163Ho is the best candidate to perform an experiment 163 to investigate the neutrino mass in the sub-eV region. The half-life of Ho is T1/2 = 4570 ± 50 y [17,18]. According to the last release of the Atomic-Mass Evaluation by Audi et al. [19], the recommended value for the energy available to the decay 163 of Ho is QEC =2.555 ± 0.016 keV obtained by combining several measurements whose results actually span over a larger range, from QEC =2.3 ± 1 keV [20]to QEC 2.8 keV [21,22]. In all these measurements the QEC-value was determined by the analysis of the energy spectrum of 163Ho, measured with different techniques. In order to remove any systematic error in the interpretation of the measured spectra, which could have led to the large discrepancies, the ECHo collaboration has recently determined the energy available to the decay of 163Ho by directly measuring the mass difference between 163Ho and 163Dy using the Penning-trap mass spectrometry technique (PTMS). The result is QEC =2.833 ± 0.030stat ± 0.015syst keV [23]. The experimental technique and the challenges to reduce the uncertainties on the QEC- value to 1 eV will be described in Section 9. 163 P − 163 P In the EC process, a 67Ho nucleus (J =7/2 ) decays to a 66Dy nucleus (J = 5/2−) by capturing an electron from an inner atomic shell and emitting an electron neutrino. A tiny fraction of energy, less than 1 meV, is taken by the nuclear recoil due to the emission of the neutrino. The rest of the energy is shared between the emitted electron neutrino and the atomic excitations of the daughter atom 163Dy. The small QEC-value energetically limits the capture processes to electrons occupying the third and higher shells. Among those, only electrons from s-levels and p1/2-levels can be captured due to angular momentum conservation and to the finite overlap of their wave function with the nucleus. The excited state in which the daughter atom 163Dy is left after the EC in 163Ho is characterized, for first order transitions, by a hole in an inner shell, corresponding to the captured electron, and an additional electron in the 4f-shell. Higher order excited states with more than one hole in the atomic shells, due to shake-up or shake- off processes, have a much smaller probability to be created [24].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CME Search Before Isobar Collisions and Blind Analysis from STAR
    CME Search Before Isobar Collisions and Blind Analysis From STAR Prithwish Tribedy for the STAR collaboration The 36th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics 1-7th March, 2020, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico In part supported by Introduction Solenoidal Tracker at RHIC (STAR) RHIC has collided multiple ion species; year 2018 was dedicated to search for effects driven by strong electromagnetic fields by STAR Isobars: Ru+Ru, Zr+Zr @ 200GeV (2018) Low energy: Au+Au 27 GeV (2018) Large systems : U+U, Au+Au @ 200 GeV P.Tribedy, WWND 2 The Chiral Magnetic Effect (Cartoon Picture) Quarks Quarks randomly aligned oriented along B antiquarks I II III IV More More right left handed handed quarks quarks J || B J || -B CME converts chiral imbalance to observable electric current P.Tribedy, WWND 2020 3 New Theory Guidance : Complexity Of An Event Magnetic field map Pb+Pb @ 2.76 TeV Axial charge profile b=11.4 fm, Npart=56 Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV, b=11.4 fm, dN5/dxT [a.u.] 0.3 6 uR>uL 0.2 4 uR<uL 0.1 2 0 0 y [fm] -2 -0.1 -4 -0.2 -6 -0.3 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 x [fm] Based on: Chatterjee, Tribedy, Phys. Rev. C 92, Based on: Lappi, Schlichting, Phys. Rev. D 97, 011902 (2015) 034034 (2018) Going beyond cartoon picture: 1) Fluctuations dominate e-by-e physics, 2) B-field & domain size of axial-charge change with √s P.Tribedy, WWND 2020 4 New Theory Guidance : Complexity Of An Event Pb+Pb @ 2.76 TeV Magnetic field b=11.4 fm, N Axial charge profile Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV, b=11.4 fm, dN5/dxT [a.u.] 0.3 6 u 0.2 4 u 0.1 2 0 0 y [fm] -2 -0.1 -4 -0.2 -6 -0.3 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 x [fm] Based on: Chatterjee,
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Isobar Nuclei in Mass Distributions of Heavy Fission Fragments of 235U Nuclei by Thermal Neutrons
    International Conference “Nuclear Science and its Application”, Samarkand, Uzbekistan, September 25-28, 2012 SEARCH FOR ISOBAR NUCLEI IN MASS DISTRIBUTIONS OF HEAVY FISSION FRAGMENTS OF 235U NUCLEI BY THERMAL NEUTRONS Abdullaeva G.A., Koblik Yu.N., Nebesniy A.F., Pikul V.P. Institute of Nuclear Physics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan To search for isobar nuclei in mass distributions of 235U nuclei heavy fission fragments (FF) caused by thermal neutrons we used experimental data from [1]. In [1] experimental data of yields for each value of mass number in FF mass numbers range from A=125 to A=155 a.m.u. depending on effective charge state z* are published. In figure 1 such experimental dependence of FF yields Yi (Ai) =f(z*) and processing of this dependence by Gauss distribution with an error to one σ for each z* is presented. The basic difficulty consisted in correct transition from measured z* to charges of heavy fragments at the moment of nuclear fission. For this purpose we used the modified expression from [2] in the form of: k * α k1 i i ii VzV1zz 0 . Here zi* and zi - the measured effective charge of the i-th ion with mass number Ai and a charge of corresponding fragment, Vi - velocity of ion, Vo - average velocity of electrons interacting with fragment in the target matter and influencing to formation of an effective charge of the ion. Velocity Vi was defined with use of measured value Ek for each fragment. Velocity Vo can 8 changes in limits from Vo = 2.2×10 cm/s - electron velocity in the first orbit of hydrogen atom to 3.6×108 cm/s [2], constants: α =0.45 and k =0.6 are taken as from [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1901.01410V3 [Astro-Ph.HE] 1 Feb 2021 Mental Information Is Available, and One Has to Rely Strongly on Theoretical Predictions for Nuclear Properties
    Origin of the heaviest elements: The rapid neutron-capture process John J. Cowan∗ HLD Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, 440 W. Brooks St., Norman, OK 73019, USA Christopher Snedeny Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, 2515 Speedway, Austin, TX 78712-1205, USA James E. Lawlerz Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1150 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706-1390, USA Ani Aprahamianx and Michael Wiescher{ Department of Physics and Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, University of Notre Dame, 225 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA Karlheinz Langanke∗∗ GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany and Institut f¨urKernphysik (Theoriezentrum), Fachbereich Physik, Technische Universit¨atDarmstadt, Schlossgartenstraße 2, 64298 Darmstadt, Germany Gabriel Mart´ınez-Pinedoyy GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany; Institut f¨urKernphysik (Theoriezentrum), Fachbereich Physik, Technische Universit¨atDarmstadt, Schlossgartenstraße 2, 64298 Darmstadt, Germany; and Helmholtz Forschungsakademie Hessen f¨urFAIR, GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany Friedrich-Karl Thielemannzz Department of Physics, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, 4056 Basel, Switzerland and GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany (Dated: February 2, 2021) The production of about half of the heavy elements found in nature is assigned to a spe- cific astrophysical nucleosynthesis process: the rapid neutron capture process (r-process). Although this idea has been postulated more than six decades ago, the full understand- ing faces two types of uncertainties/open questions: (a) The nucleosynthesis path in the nuclear chart runs close to the neutron-drip line, where presently only limited experi- arXiv:1901.01410v3 [astro-ph.HE] 1 Feb 2021 mental information is available, and one has to rely strongly on theoretical predictions for nuclear properties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nucleus and Nuclear Instability
    Lecture 2: The nucleus and nuclear instability Nuclei are described using the following nomenclature: A Z Element N Z is the atomic number, the number of protons: this defines the element. A is called the “mass number” A = N + Z. N is the number of neutrons (N = A - Z) Nuclide: A species of nucleus of a given Z and A. Isotope: Nuclides of an element (i.e. same Z) with different N. Isotone: Nuclides having the same N. Isobar: Nuclides having the same A. [A handy way to keep these straight is to note that isotope includes the letter “p” (same proton number), isotone the letter “n” (same neutron number), and isobar the letter “a” (same A).] Example: 206 82 Pb124 is an isotope of 208 82 Pb126 is an isotone of 207 83 Bi124 and an isobar of 206 84 Po122 1 Chart of the Nuclides Image removed. 90 natural elements 109 total elements All elements with Z > 42 are man-made Except for technicium Z=43 Promethium Z = 61 More than 800 nuclides are known (274 are stable) “stable” unable to transform into another configuration without the addition of outside energy. “unstable” = radioactive Images removed. [www2.bnl.gov/ton] 2 Nuclear Structure: Forces in the nucleus Coulomb Force Force between two point charges, q, separated by distance, r (Coulomb’s Law) k0 q1q2 F(N) = 9 2 -2 r 2 k0 = 8.98755 x 10 N m C (Boltzman constant) Potential energy (MeV) of one particle relative to the other k q q PE(MeV)= 0 1 2 r Strong Nuclear Force • Acts over short distances • ~ 10-15 m • can overcome Coulomb repulsion • acts on protons and neutrons Image removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Fission Product Yield Data for Thermal Reactors
    Atomic Energy of Canada Limited STATUS OF FISSION PRODUCT YIELD DATA FOR THERMAL REACTORS by W.H. WALKER Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories Chalk River, Ontario February 1974 AECL-4704, tr - STATUS OF FISSION PRODUCT YIELD DATA FOR THERMAL REACTORS W.H. Walker Review Paper lla for the I.A.E.A. Panel on Fission Product Nuclear Data, held at Bologna, Italy, November 26 - 30, 1973. Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories Chalk River, Ontario February 1974 AECL-4704 STATUS OF FISSION PRODUCT YIELD DATA FOR THERMAL REACTORS by W.H. Walker ABSTRACT Methods of measuring fission product yields are discussed. Measured and evaluated chain yields from thermal neutron fission of 233U, 235U, 239Pu and 21flPu are reviewed and evaluated yields are compared in an appendix. Measured fractional and direct yields of interest in reactor cal- culations are discussed and compiled in an appendix. The few data on cumulative yields from fission by low energy epithermal neutrons are noted and their significance in reactor calculations estimated. Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories Chalk River, Ontario February 1974 AECL-4704 Connaissances actuelles, en matière de rendement des produits de fission, pour les réacteurs thermiques par W.H. Walker Résumé Les méthodes permettant de mesurer le rendement des produits de fission font l'objet de commentaires. Des rendements en chaîne ayant été mesurés et évalués à partir 2 3 3 235 239 de la fission, par neutrons thermiques, de U, U, Pu 241 et Pu sont passés en revue et les rendements évalués font l'objet d'une comparaison dans une annexe. Les rende- ments mesurés, directs ou fractionnels, qui présentent un intérêt pour les calculs de réacteur font l'objet de commen- taires et ils sent compilés dans une annexe.
    [Show full text]
  • The R-Process of Stellar Nucleosynthesis: Astrophysics and Nuclear Physics Achievements and Mysteries
    The r-process of stellar nucleosynthesis: Astrophysics and nuclear physics achievements and mysteries M. Arnould, S. Goriely, and K. Takahashi Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique, Universit´eLibre de Bruxelles, CP226, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium Abstract The r-process, or the rapid neutron-capture process, of stellar nucleosynthesis is called for to explain the production of the stable (and some long-lived radioac- tive) neutron-rich nuclides heavier than iron that are observed in stars of various metallicities, as well as in the solar system. A very large amount of nuclear information is necessary in order to model the r-process. This concerns the static characteristics of a large variety of light to heavy nuclei between the valley of stability and the vicinity of the neutron-drip line, as well as their beta-decay branches or their reactivity. Fission probabilities of very neutron-rich actinides have also to be known in order to determine the most massive nuclei that have a chance to be involved in the r-process. Even the properties of asymmetric nuclear matter may enter the problem. The enormously challenging experimental and theoretical task imposed by all these requirements is reviewed, and the state-of-the-art development in the field is presented. Nuclear-physics-based and astrophysics-free r-process models of different levels of sophistication have been constructed over the years. We review their merits and their shortcomings. The ultimate goal of r-process studies is clearly to identify realistic sites for the development of the r-process. Here too, the challenge is enormous, and the solution still eludes us.
    [Show full text]
  • Double-Beta Decay of 96Zr and Double-Electron Capture of 156Dy to Excited Final States
    Double-Beta Decay of 96Zr and Double-Electron Capture of 156Dy to Excited Final States by Sean W. Finch Department of Physics Duke University Date: Approved: Werner Tornow, Supervisor Calvin Howell Kate Scholberg Berndt Mueller Albert Chang Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2015 Abstract Double-Beta Decay of 96Zr and Double-Electron Capture of 156Dy to Excited Final States by Sean W. Finch Department of Physics Duke University Date: Approved: Werner Tornow, Supervisor Calvin Howell Kate Scholberg Berndt Mueller Albert Chang An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2015 Copyright c 2015 by Sean W. Finch All rights reserved except the rights granted by the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License Abstract Two separate experimental searches for second-order weak nuclear decays to excited final states were conducted. Both experiments were carried out at the Kimballton Underground Research Facility to provide shielding from cosmic rays. The first search is for the 2νββ decay of 96Zr to excited final states of the daughter nucleus, 96Mo. As a byproduct of this experiment, the β decay of 96Zr was also investigated. Two coaxial high-purity germanium detectors were used in coincidence to detect γ rays produced by the daughter nucleus as it de-excited to the ground state. After collecting 1.92 years of data with 17.91 g of enriched 96Zr, half-life limits at the level of 1020 yr were produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Magic Numbers: New Features Far from Stability
    Nuclear magic numbers: new features far from stability O. Sorlin1, M.-G. Porquet2 1Grand Acc´el´erateur National d’Ions Lours (GANIL), CEA/DSM - CNRS/IN2P3, B.P. 55027, F-14076 Caen Cedex 5, France 2Centre de Spectrom´etrie Nucl´eaire et de Spectrom´etrie de Masse (CSNSM), CNRS/IN2P3 - Universit´eParis-Sud, Bˆat 104-108, F-91405 Orsay, France May 19, 2008 Abstract The main purpose of the present manuscript is to review the structural evolution along the isotonic and isotopic chains around the ”traditional” magic numbers 8, 20, 28, 50, 82 and 126. The exotic regions of the chart of nuclides have been explored during the three last decades. Then the postulate of permanent magic numbers was definitely abandoned and the reason for these structural mutations has been in turn searched for. General trends in the evolution of shell closures are discussed using complementary experimental information, such as the binding energies of the orbits bounding the shell gaps, the trends of the first collective states of the even-even semi-magic nuclei, and the behavior of certain single-nucleon states. Each section is devoted to a particular magic number. It describes the underlying physics of the shell evolution which is not yet fully understood and indicates future experimental and theoretical challenges. The nuclear mean field embodies various facets of the Nucleon- Nucleon interaction, among which the spin-orbit and tensor terms play decisive roles in the arXiv:0805.2561v1 [nucl-ex] 16 May 2008 shell evolutions. The present review intends to provide experimental constraints to be used for the refinement of theoretical models aiming at a good description of the existing atomic nuclei and at more accurate predictions of hitherto unreachable systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Mass and Stability
    CHAPTER 3 Nuclear Mass and Stability Contents 3.1. Patterns of nuclear stability 41 3.2. Neutron to proton ratio 43 3.3. Mass defect 45 3.4. Binding energy 47 3.5. Nuclear radius 48 3.6. Semiempirical mass equation 50 3.7. Valley of $-stability 51 3.8. The missing elements: 43Tc and 61Pm 53 3.8.1. Promethium 53 3.8.2. Technetium 54 3.9. Other modes of instability 56 3.10. Exercises 56 3.11. Literature 57 3.1. Patterns of nuclear stability There are approximately 275 different nuclei which have shown no evidence of radioactive decay and, hence, are said to be stable with respect to radioactive decay. When these nuclei are compared for their constituent nucleons, we find that approximately 60% of them have both an even number of protons and an even number of neutrons (even-even nuclei). The remaining 40% are about equally divided between those that have an even number of protons and an odd number of neutrons (even-odd nuclei) and those with an odd number of protons and an even number of neutrons (odd-even nuclei). There are only 5 stable nuclei known which have both 2 6 10 14 an odd number of protons and odd number of neutrons (odd-odd nuclei); 1H, 3Li, 5B, 7N, and 50 23V. It is significant that the first stable odd-odd nuclei are abundant in the very light elements 2 (the low abundance of 1H has a special explanation, see Ch. 17). The last nuclide is found in low isotopic abundance (0.25%) and we cannot be certain that this nuclide is not unstable to radioactive decay with extremely long half-life.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Abundances
    Stellar Abundances As probes of stellar nucleosynthesis and chemical evolution I. Basic principles of stellar nucleosynthesis II. Basic ingredients III. Deciphering abundances Francesca Primas ESO KES Lecture – Mar 6, 2017 GCE: some basics The chemical history of the Galaxy is dominated by the nucleosynthesis occurring in many generations of stars • Ini<ally: X=Xi (~0.75) Y=Yi (~0.25) Z=Zi (0.0) Today: X=Xj (~0.73) Y=Yj (~0.25) Z=Zj (0.02) • Elements are made in stars, ejected into the ISM by stellar winds and supernova explosions. • Elements are mixed into the ISM out of which new stars form. Each new stellar generaon is born from gas with higher metallicity: X Y Z yield, IMF, SFR • The cycle repeats itself over billions of years Chemical abundances in the solar system/ vicinity provide the richest informaon. Different ways to sort and group the elements … • By nucleosynthe-c origin and nuclear proper-es • primordial, H-, He-, C-, Ne-, Si-burning, n-captures • stable, long-lived or short-lived radioac<ve Big Bang CR spalla,on H-burning (hydro) H-burning (expl) He-burning C-burning O-burning Ne-burning Expl. Nucleosyn. NSE s-process r-process Origin of atoms in the solar system • Two sources: nucleosynthesis in the BIG BANG and in STARS • The Big Bang made only H and He (and some Li) • All other nuclei are created/produced in stars, by 3 kinds of processes: Nuclear burning (fusion) PP cycles, CNO bi-cycle, He-, C-, O-, Si-burnings … make atoms up to 40Ca (in MS + RG stars) Photodisintegraon rapid nuclear rearrangements, at γ-ray energies
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1908.10231V2 [Nucl-Th] 25 Oct 2019 Could Disentangle the Background from the Signal
    Influence of the neutron-skin effect on nuclear isobar collisions at RHIC Jan Hammelmann,1, 2, ∗ Alba Soto-Ontoso,3, y Massimiliano Alvioli,4, z Hannah Elfner,5, 1, 2, x and Mark Strikman6, { 1Goethe-Universit¨atFrankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 2Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Ruth-Moufang-Strasse 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 3Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA. 4Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Ricerca per la Protezione Idrogeologica, via Madonna Alta 126, I-06128 Perugia, Italy. 5GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung GmbH, Planckstr. 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany. 6Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. The unambiguous observation of a Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME)-driven charge separation is 96 96 96 96 pthe core aim of the isobar program at RHIC consisting of 40Zr+40Zr and 44Ru+44Ru collisions at sNN = 200 GeV. We quantify the role of the spatial distributions of the nucleons in the isobars on both eccentricity and magnetic field strength within a relativistic hadronic transport approach (SMASH, Simulating Many Accelerated Strongly-interacting Hadrons). In particular, we introduce isospin-dependent nucleon-nucleon spatial correlations in the geometric description of both nuclei, 96 96 deformation for 44Ru and the so-called neutron skin effect for the neutron-rich isobar i.e. 40Zr. The 96 96 main result of this study is a reduction of the magnetic field strength difference between 44Ru+44Ru 96 96 and 40Zr+40Zr by a factor of 2, from 10% to 5% in peripheral collisions when the neutron-skin effect is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrinoless Quadruple Beta Decay (0Ν4β) Is 2 2 2 and Zero, Respectively
    Neutrinoless Quadruple Beta Decay Julian Heeck∗ and Werner Rodejohann† Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany We point out that lepton number violation is possible even if neutrinos are Dirac particles. We illustrate this by constructing a simple model that allows for lepton number violation by four units only. As a consequence, neutrinoless double beta decay is forbidden, but neutrinoless quadruple beta decay is possible: (A, Z) → (A, Z +4)+4 e−. We identify three candidate isotopes for this decay, the 150 most promising one being Nd due to its high Q0ν4β -value of 2 MeV. Analogous processes, such as neutrinoless quadruple electron capture, are also possible. The expected lifetimes are extremely long, and experimental searches are challenging. INTRODUCTION We will first construct a simple toy model that for- bids Majorana neutrinos but allows for LNV by four Of all the open questions concerning neutrinos—mass units. Then we will search for interesting isotopes that scale and hierarchy, possible CP violation, origin of the can undergo 0ν4β and estimate the expected lifetimes. mixing pattern—the conceptually most interesting has Interestingly, all three isotopes that we identify as po- 96 136 150 to be its very nature: is the neutrino its own antiparti- tential 0ν4β-emitters ( Zr, Xe, and Nd) are fa- cle, and hence a Majorana fermion, or do neutrino and miliar from searches for neutrinoless double beta decay. 150 antineutrino differ, making the neutrino a Dirac particle The most interesting candidate is Nd, with a Q0ν4β- like all the other fermions of the Standard Model (SM).
    [Show full text]