DOCSLIB.ORG

Scanned Using Book Scancenter 7131

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ALEXANDER PUSHKIN THE QUEEN OE SPADES AND SELECTED WORKS Translated from the Russian by Anthony Briggs Pushkin Press LONDON The Queen of Spades [Pikovaya dama) CONTENTS originally published in Russian in 1834 The Stationmaster {Stanisionnyy smotritel’) originally published in Introduction Russian in The Tales of the Late Ivan Petrovich Belkin {Povestipokoynogo Ivana Petrovicha Belkina) in 1830 The Queen of Spades The Stationmaster All English language translations in this volume Extract from the Blank-Verse © A.D.P. Briggs, 2012 Tragedy Boris Godunov This edition first published in 2012 by Mozart and Salieri Pushkin Press The Bronze Horseman 71-75 Shelton Street Tsar Nikita and His Forty Daughters . London WC2H9JQ, Extract from Tevgeny Onegin The Prophet ISBN 978 1 908968 03 6 To Anna Kern All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be Winter Evening reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any The Upas Tree form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, Man Found Drowned recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing ‘Winter. What Shall We Do?’ from Pushkin Press ‘When I Stroll Down a Busy Street’ ‘Oh, I Have Loved You’ Frontispiece: Portrait of Alexander Pushkin ‘No, Not for Me the Stormiest by Vasili Andreevich Tropinin, © State Russian Museum, Pleasures of the Senses’ St Petersburg/Giraudon/The Bridgeman Art Library ‘When I Reach Over to Enfold You’ Set in 10 on 13 Monotype Baskerville ‘The Time Has Gome, Dear Friend’ by Tetragon, London Autumn (A Fragment) and printed in Great Britain on Munken Premium White 90 gsm Elegy by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall Remembrance ‘I Have My Monument’ www.pushkinpress.com Ignore them, please. Keep playing, move on quickly To fill my spirit overfull with sounds... MOZART. If only everyone could feel the power Of harmony, like you. But no. The world THE BRONZE HORSEMAN Could not exist if that were so. Nobody Would bother with the squalid cares of life. And all would wallow lavishly in art. We chosen men are few, we happy idlers Who disregard base functions of the day. Foreword We priests of nothing but the beautiful... Is it not true?... The occurrence described in this story is based on real events. But I’m not feeling well... Details of the flood are taken from contemporary journals. A heavy pain inside... I’ll have a sleep... Anyone interested may consult the report by V.N. Berkh. I’ll say goodnight. SALIERI. Goodnight. Introducthn Alone Gazing across a watery waste. You’ll go to sleep, Mozart, for a long time... But is he right? He of the mighty visions faced Perhaps I’m not a genius. Maybe genius The farthest deeps. Vast in its scope. Is incompatible with evil. No! The river carried, as it raced. Take Michelangelo... Or was that story One miserable little boat. Dreamt up by hoi polloi? The Vatican The swampy banks were mossy green May not have been created by a killer! Wfith dark huts few and far between. The homes of lowly Finnish folk. The forests, through their misty screen. Where hidden sunbeams never broke. Murmured with noises. 89 And he pondered: Dark, decorating every isle. “We’ll scare the Swedes away. This place Green were the gardens which had grown. Shall see a city strongly founded, The capital, of younger life. Flung in our brazen neighbour’s face. Outshone the Moscow that had been. A window into Europe we As an ascendant ruler’s wife Shall cut by Nature’s own decree, Outshines the purpled, widowed queen. And build a soHd sea-shore station. Borne here across the unknown main. All vessels we shall entertain. 0 Peter’s work, I love you so! And freely spread our celebration.” 1 love your stateliness and strength. The Neva’s soft, majestic flow. The granite bordering her length. A century saw the city’s birth, Your iron railings’ hard design. A lovely wonder of the north. And through the thoughtfulness of night From darkest woods and swampy earth Your limpid twilight’s moonless shine. Magnificently rising forth. When in my room I stay to write Where Finnish fishermen before. Or sit, without a lamp, to read. Stepsons of Nature, all alone. The sleeping streets shine clear indeed. Stood sadly on the shallow shore Vast masses emptied of their people; And cast into the depths unknown Briglit, too, the Admiralty steeple. Their rotting nets—in this place now The darkness is denied possession Along the living banks see how Of this, the golden firmament. Huge, shapely buildings throng and rise. Dawn follows dawn in swift succession; Tower and palace: vessels race Night’s borrowed half-hour is soon spent. In fleets from earth’s remotest place I love your cruel winter, too. To quaysides rich with all supplies. The still air and the frosty shiver. The Neva now was clad in storie. Girls’ cheeks with more than rosy hue, New bridges crossed the water, while. The sledging down the Neva river. 90 91 The brilliance, noise and talk there is May Finland’s waters soon forget. At balls; the single fellow’s turn Nor with their futile rage upset To feast, when glasses foam and fizz. Tsar Peter’s everlasting sleep. And in the punch the blue flames burn. I love, in lively, warlike duty. A time of dread there was. We keep Cadets upon the Martian field. A memory of it not yet old... Foot soldiers, cavalry, revealed And of these times, my reader friend. In level and unchanging beauty. The story shall I now unfold The rippling, orderly array From sorry start to grievous end. Of banners torn, victorious ones. Their helmets, wrought in shining bronze. Shot through by bullets in the fray. I love you, capital of Mars, Part One When fortress cannons smoke and roar To welcome to the house of tsars On Petrograd the dark mists rose, A son, the northern queen’s gift, or November blew and autumn froze. To greet new victories in war The noisy Neva splashed ahead And raise triumphant Russian voices. And in her shapely confines heaved. Or when the Neva starts the motion As does a sick man, in his bed Of cracked blue ice towards the ocean Tossing and turning, unrelieved. And, with a sense of spring, rejoices. And in the midnight darkness rain Beat bitterly upon the pane. The keening tempest howled and squalled. O Peter’s town, like Russia, here After a visit homeward came Stand splendidly and firmly founded! A youth. Yevgeny was his name. Peace with the elements is near. Our present hero shall be called The elements which you confounded. By such a title, since its sound The wrath and chains of yesteryear Delights the ear: my pen has found 92 93 t Before a friendly air about it. From off the river, as it lifted. His surname? We can do without it, The Neva bridges had been shifted. Though years ago it might have been He and Parasha some few days In something of a bright position, Would walk in separated ways. And in the hands of Karamzin Yevgeny gave a heartfelt sigh. A great sound in our land s tradition. And set off dreaming like a poet: And yet the world and tongues of men Do not recall it now as then. “Marriage? Why should I never know it? Somewhere our hero is employed. Life would be hard, of course, but I, The great he chooses to avoid, With youth and health, am well prepared lives in Kolomna, never weeping To labour night and day, unspared. For ages lost or kinsfolk sleeping. And I shall find a way to build Yevgeny, then, arriving home. A humble shelter, plain to see. Took off his overcoat, undressed. Where all Parasha’s cares are stilled. Lay down, but couldn’t sleep or rest. And in a year or two, maybe. So widely did his wild thoughts roam. I’ll get a littie job and give What did he think about? That he Parasha care of where we live Was poor; that honest toil might see And also of the children: thus Him grow to be of good repute We shall live, and, hand in hand. And of the self-sufficient kind; Together till the grave we’ll stand. That God might further contribute Our grandchildren shall bury us...” To fill his pocket and his mind; That many a lucky man displays A lack of wit and lazy ways Thus did he dream that night, alone And yet lives easy and secure! In sadness. If the wind and rain That he had worked two years together. Would only ease their plaintive moan He also thought about the weather, And not attack the window pane Relendess still; by now, for sure. With such a fury... 94 95 Heavy-eyed, Petropolis was soon to be At last he slept. The stormy grey Waist-deep, like Triton, in the sea... Fades from the misty night outside, And thins before a pale new day... A siege! The wicked waters strike, A day of horror! Climbing through windows, burglar-like. AU that night The Neva faced both storm and sea. The stems of boats in full career Crushed by their wild stupidity. Smash panes. Now hawkers’ trays appear Until she could no longer fight... With covers soaked; beams, roofs go past From broken huts; cheap things amassed By poor, pale beggars, few by few; By morning crowds were teeming by Storm-shattered bridges; coffins, too. Along her banks to watch and wonder From steeping cemeteries exhumed. At waters splashing mountains high Swim down the streets!.. And foaming furiously asunder.
Recommended publications
  • Musorgsky's Boris Godunov

    Musorgsky's Boris Godunov

    22 JANUARY 2019 Musorgsky’s Boris Godunov PROFESSOR MARINA FROLOVA-WALKER Today we are going to look at what is possibly the most famous of Russian operas – Musorgsky’s Boris Godunov. Its route to international celebrity is very clear – the great impresario Serge Diaghilev staged it in Paris in 1908, with the star bass Fyodor Chaliapin in the main role. The opera the Parisians saw would have taken Musorgsky by surprise. First, it was staged in a heavily reworked edition made by Rimsky-Korsakov after Musorgsky’s death, where only about 20% of the bars in the original were left unchanged. But that was still a modest affair compared to the steps Diaghilev took on his own initiative. The production had a Russian cast singing the opera in Russian, and Diaghilev was worried that the Parisians would lose patience with scenes that were more wordy, since they would follow none of it, so he decided simply to cut these scenes, even though this meant that some crucial turning points in the drama were lost altogether. He then reordered the remaining scenes to heighten contrasts, jumbling the chronology. In effect, the opera had become a series of striking tableaux rather than a drama with a coherent plot. But as pure spectacle, it was indeed impressive, with astonishing sets provided by the painter Golovin and with the excitement generated by Chaliapin as Boris. For all its shortcomings, it was this production that brought Musorgsky’s masterwork to the world’s attention. 1908, the year of the Paris production was nearly thirty years after Musorgsky’s death, and nearly and forty years after the opera was completed.
  • Boris Godunov

    Boris Godunov

    Boris Godunov and Little Tragedies Alexander Pushkin Translated by Roger Clarke FE<NFIC; :C8JJ@:J ONEWORLD CLASSICS LTD London House 243-253 Lower Mortlake Road Richmond Surrey TW9 2LL United Kingdom www.oneworldclassics.com Boris Godunov first published in Russian in 1831 The Mean-Spirited Knight first published in Russian in 1836 Mozart and Salieri first published in Russian in 1831 The Stone Guest first published in Russian in 1839 A Feast during the Plague first published in Russian in 1832 This translation first published by Oneworld Classics Limited in 2010 English translations, introductions, notes, extra material and appendices © Roger Clarke, 2010 Front cover image © Catriona Gray Printed in Great Britain by MPG Books, Cornwall ISBN: 978-1-84749-147-3 All the material in this volume is reprinted with permission or presumed to be in the public domain. Every effort has been made to ascertain and acknowledge the copyright status, but should there have been any unwitting oversight on our part, we would be happy to rectify the error in subsequent printings. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of the publisher. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not be resold, lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the express prior consent of the publisher. Contents Boris Godunov 1 Introduction by Roger Clarke 3 Boris Godunov 9 Little Tragedies 105 Introduction by Roger Clarke 107 The Mean-Spirited Knight 109 Mozart and Salieri 131 The Stone Guest 143 A Feast during the Plague 181 Notes on Boris Godunov 193 Notes on Little Tragedies 224 Extra Material 241 Alexander Pushkin’s Life 243 Boris Godunov 251 Little Tragedies 262 Translator’s Note 280 Select Bibliography 282 Appendices 285 1.
  • The Inextricable Link Between Literature and Music in 19Th

    The Inextricable Link Between Literature and Music in 19Th

    COMPOSERS AS STORYTELLERS: THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN LITERATURE AND MUSIC IN 19TH CENTURY RUSSIA A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Music Ashley Shank December 2010 COMPOSERS AS STORYTELLERS: THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN LITERATURE AND MUSIC IN 19TH CENTURY RUSSIA Ashley Shank Thesis Approved: Accepted: _______________________________ _______________________________ Advisor Interim Dean of the College Dr. Brooks Toliver Dr. Dudley Turner _______________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Mr. George Pope Dr. George R. Newkome _______________________________ _______________________________ School Director Date Dr. William Guegold ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECULAR ART MUSIC IN RUSSIA……..………………………………………………..……………….1 Introduction……………………..…………………………………………………1 The Introduction of Secular High Art………………………………………..……3 Nicholas I and the Rise of the Noble Dilettantes…………………..………….....10 The Rise of the Russian School and Musical Professionalism……..……………19 Nationalism…………………………..………………………………………..…23 Arts Policies and Censorship………………………..…………………………...25 II. MUSIC AND LITERATURE AS A CULTURAL DUET………………..…32 Cross-Pollination……………………………………………………………...…32 The Russian Soul in Literature and Music………………..……………………...38 Music in Poetry: Sound and Form…………………………..……………...……44 III. STORIES IN MUSIC…………………………………………………… ….51 iii Opera……………………………………………………………………………..57
  • Russia in the Accounts of Sixteenth-Century English Voyagers, Ed

    Russia in the Accounts of Sixteenth-Century English Voyagers, Ed

    Rude and Barbarous Kingdom: Russia in the Accounts of Sixteenth-Century English Voyagers, ed. Lloyd E. Berry and Robert O. Crummey, Madison, Milwaukee and London: University of Wisconsin Press, 1968. xxiii, 391 pp. $7.50. This attractively-presented volume is yet another instance of the work of publishers in making available in a more accessible form primary sources which it was hitherto necessary to seek among dusty collections of the Hakluyt Society publications. Here we have in a single volume accounts of the travels of Richard Chancellor, Anthony Jenkinson and Thomas Randolph, together with the better-known and more extensive narrative contained in Giles Fletcher's Of the Russe Commonwealth and Sir Jerome Horsey's Travels. The most entertaining component of this volume is certainly the series of descriptions culled from George Turberville's Tragicall Tales, all written to various friends in rhyming couplets. This was apparently the sixteenth-century equivalent of the picture postcard, through apparently Turberville was not having a wonderful time! English merchants evidently enjoyed high favour at the court of Ivan IV, but Horsey's account reflects the change of policy brought about by the accession to power of Boris Godunov. Although the English travellers were very astute observers, naturally there are many inaccuracies in their accounts. Horsey, for instance, mistook the Volkhov for the Volga, and most of these good Anglicans came away from Russia with weird ideas about the Orthodox Church. The editors have, by their introductions and footnotes, provided an invaluable service. However, in the introduction to the text of Chancellor's account it is stated that his observation of the practice of debt-bondage is interesting in that "the practice of bondage by loan contract did not reach its full development until the economic collapse at the end of the century and the civil wars that followed".
  • The End of Boris. Contribution to an Aesthetics of Disorientation

    The End of Boris. Contribution to an Aesthetics of Disorientation

    The end of Boris. ConTriBuTion To an aesTheTiCs of disorienTaTion by reuven Tsur The Emergence of the Opera–An Outline Boris Godunov was tsar of russia in the years 1598–1605. he came to power after fyodor, the son of ivan the terrible, died without heirs. Boris was fyodor's brother-in-law, and in fact, even during fyodor's life he was the omnipotent ruler of russia. ivan the Terrible had had his eldest son executed, whereas his youngest son, dmitri, had been murdered in unclear circumstances. in the 16–17th centuries, as well as among the 19th-century authors the prevalent view was that it was Boris who ordered dmitri's murder (some present-day historians believe that dmitri's murder too was ordered by ivan the Terrible). in time, two pretenders appeared, one after the other, who claimed the throne, purporting to be dmitri, saved miraculously. Boris' story got told in many versions, in history books and on the stage. Most recently, on 12 July 2005 The New York Times reported the 295-year-late premiere of the opera Boris Goudenow, or The Throne Attained Through Cunning, or Honor Joined Happily With Affection by the German Baroque composer Johann Mattheson. Boris' story prevailed in three genres: history, tragedy, and opera. in the nineteenth century, the three genres culminated in n. M. Karamzin's monumental History of the Russian State, in alexander Pushkin's tragedy Boris Godunov, and in Modest Mussorgsky's opera Boris Godunov. each later author in this list liberally drew upon his predecessors. in her erudite and brilliant 397 reuven tsur the end of boris book, Caryl emerson (1986) compared these three versions in a Pimen interprets as an expression of the latter's ambition.
  • Pushkin and the Futurists

    Pushkin and the Futurists

    1 A Stowaway on the Steamship of Modernity: Pushkin and the Futurists James Rann UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2 Declaration I, James Rann, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 Acknowledgements I owe a great debt of gratitude to my supervisor, Robin Aizlewood, who has been an inspirational discussion partner and an assiduous reader. Any errors in interpretation, argumentation or presentation are, however, my own. Many thanks must also go to numerous people who have read parts of this thesis, in various incarnations, and offered generous and insightful commentary. They include: Julian Graffy, Pamela Davidson, Seth Graham, Andreas Schönle, Alexandra Smith and Mark D. Steinberg. I am grateful to Chris Tapp for his willingness to lead me through certain aspects of Biblical exegesis, and to Robert Chandler and Robin Milner-Gulland for sharing their insights into Khlebnikov’s ‘Odinokii litsedei’ with me. I would also like to thank Julia, for her inspiration, kindness and support, and my parents, for everything. 4 Note on Conventions I have used the Library of Congress system of transliteration throughout, with the exception of the names of tsars and the cities Moscow and St Petersburg. References have been cited in accordance with the latest guidelines of the Modern Humanities Research Association. In the relevant chapters specific works have been referenced within the body of the text. They are as follows: Chapter One—Vladimir Markov, ed., Manifesty i programmy russkikh futuristov; Chapter Two—Velimir Khlebnikov, Sobranie sochinenii v shesti tomakh, ed.
  • Nombre Autor

    Nombre Autor

    ANUARI DE FILOLOGIA. LLENGÜES I LITERATURES MODERNES (Anu.Filol.Lleng.Lit.Mod.) 9/2019, pp. 53-57, ISSN: 2014-1394, DOI: 10.1344/AFLM2019.9.4 PUSHKIN – «DON JUAN» IN THE INTERPRETATION OF P. HUBER AND M. ARMALINSKIY TATIANA SHEMETOVA M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0003-3342-8508 ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the description of the two mythologemes of Pushkin myth (PM). According to the first, the great Russian poet secretly loved one woman all his life and dedicated many unattributed poems to her. This is the mythologeme of Pushkin’s hidden love. The other side of the myth is based on the “Ushakova’s Album” (her personal notebook for her friends’ poetries), in which the poet joked down the names of all his beloveds (Don Juan List). On the basis of this document, the literary critic P. Guber and the “publisher” of Pushkin’s Secret Notes, M. Armalinsky, make ambiguous conclusions and give a new life to Pushkin myth in the 20-21st centuries. KEYWORDS: the myth of Pushkin, hidden love, Russian literature of the twentieth century, “Don Juan of Pushkin,” Pushkin’s Secret Notes, P. Guber, M. Armalinsky. INTRODUCTION: THE STATE OF THE QUESTION The application of the concept “Pushkin myth” (PM) is very diverse, which sometimes leads to an unreasonable expansion of the meaning of the term. Like any myth (ancient or modern), the PM is a plot that develops from episodes- mythologemes. In this article we will review two mythologemes of the PM: “monogamous Pushkin” and “Pushkin – Don Juan (i.
  • Boris Godunov

    Boris Godunov

    Modest Mussorgsky Boris Godunov CONDUCTOR Opera in a prologue and four acts Valery Gergiev Libretto by the composer, based on the play by PRODUCTION Alexander Pushkin (1875 version, with additions Stephen Wadsworth from the 1869 version) SET DESIGNER Ferdinand Wögerbauer Saturday, October 23, 2010, 12:00–4:15 pm COSTUME DESIGNER Moidele Bickel New Production LIGHTING DESIGNER Duane Schuler CHOREOGRAPHER Apostolia Tsolaki This production of Boris Godunov was made possible by generous gifts from Karen and Kevin Kennedy, Mr. and Mrs. Howard Solomon, and Mr. and Mrs. Wilmer J. Thomas, Jr. GENERAL MANAGER Peter Gelb MUSIC DIRECTOR James Levine 2010–11 Season The 268th Metropolitan Opera performance of Modest Mussorgsky’s Boris Godunov Conductor Valery Gergiev in o r d e r o f v o c a l a p p e a r a n c e Nikitich, a police officer Xenia, daughter of Boris Valerian Ruminski Jennifer Zetlan Mitiukha, a peasant Feodor, son of Boris Mikhail Svetlov Jonathan A. Makepeace Shchelkalov, a boyar Nurse, nanny to Boris’s Alexey Markov children Larisa Shevchenko Prince Shuisky, a boyar Oleg Balashov Boyar in Attendance Brian Frutiger Boris Godunov René Pape Marina Ekaterina Semenchuk Pimen, a monk Mikhail Petrenko Rangoni, a Jesuit priest Evgeny Nikitin Grigory, a monk, later pretender to the Russian throne Holy Fool Aleksandrs Antonenko Andrey Popov Hostess of the Inn Chernikovsky, a Jesuit Olga Savova Mark Schowalter Missail Lavitsky, a Jesuit Nikolai Gassiev Andrew Oakden Varlaam Khrushchov, a boyar Vladimir Ognovenko Dennis Petersen Police Officer Gennady Bezzubenkov Saturday, October 23, 2010, 12:00–4:15 pm This afternoon’s performance is being transmitted live in high definition to movie theaters worldwide.
  • Freedom from Violence and Lies Essays on Russian Poetry and Music by Simon Karlinsky

    Freedom from Violence and Lies Essays on Russian Poetry and Music by Simon Karlinsky

    Freedom From Violence and lies essays on russian Poetry and music by simon Karlinsky simon Karlinsky, early 1970s Photograph by Joseph Zimbrolt Ars Rossica Series Editor — David M. Bethea (University of Wisconsin-Madison) Freedom From Violence and lies essays on russian Poetry and music by simon Karlinsky edited by robert P. Hughes, Thomas a. Koster, richard Taruskin Boston 2013 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: A catalog record for this book as available from the Library of Congress. Copyright © 2013 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-61811-158-6 On the cover: Heinrich Campendonk (1889–1957), Bayerische Landschaft mit Fuhrwerk (ca. 1918). Oil on panel. In Simon Karlinsky’s collection, 1946–2009. © 2012 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn Published by Academic Studies Press in 2013. 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Effective December 12th, 2017, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. The open access publication of this volume is made possible by: This open access publication is part of a project supported by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book initiative, which includes the open access release of several Academic Studies Press volumes. To view more titles available as free ebooks and to learn more about this project, please visit borderlinesfoundation.org/open.
  • И Pavel N. Berkov • Wechselbeziehungen I Zwischen

    И Pavel N. Berkov • Wechselbeziehungen I Zwischen

    И Pavel N. Berkov • сi ад с 5 .с i ='N9 Ф <л Wechselbeziehungen _C U I J? I zwischen Rußland f 0) JZ u |J und Westeurapa Ц 2 0> 1 im 18.Jahrhundert I O s_ O) 00 щщ^ Bfpfegjjj AUS DEM INHALT Zur russischen Theaterterminologie des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts Zum Problem des tonischen Verses Frühe russische Horaz -Über setzer Aus der Geschichte der russisch-französischen Kulturbeziehungen „Wertheru-Motive in Puśkins „Eugen Onegin" Jakob Stählin und seine Materialien zur Geschichte der russischen Literatur Johann Gottlieb Willamov, ein Freund und Landsmann Herders tichutzumschlagentwitrf: Hans Kvrzhahn NEUE BEITRÄGE ZUR LITERATURWISSENSCHAFT Herausgegeben von Prof. Dr. Werner Krauss und Prof. Dr. Walter Dietze Band 31 PAVEL N.BERKOV Literarische Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Rußland und Westeuropa im 18. Jahrhundert RÜTTEN & LOENING • BERLIN 1968 Redaktion: Helmut GraßhofFund Ulf Lehmann i. Auflage 1968 Alle Rechte vorbehalten • Rütten & Loening, Berlin Lizenznummer: 220-415/4/68 Printed in the German Democratic Republic Einband und Schutzumschlag: Hans Kurzhahn VEB Druckhaus „Maxim Gorki", Altenburg Vorbemerkung Beim Erscheinen eines Sammelbandes mit Aufsätzen, die im Verlaufe einiger Jahrzehnte entstanden sind, sollte sich jeder Autor die Frage stellen, ob der Leser nicht Anspruch hat auf einige, wenn auch nur kurze Erläuterungen über die Entstehung des Buches und die Prinzipien, die den Verfasser bei seinen Forschungen leiteten. Wenn diesem Bedürfnis, wie die Praxis zeigt, aus den verschiedensten Gründen oft nicht ent­ sprochen wird, so folgt daraus noch keineswegs, daß derartige einleitende Worte des Autors an den Leser überflüssig sind. Dies trifft für jeden Sammelband zu, den ein Autor selbst besorgt, aber in noch stärkerem Maße gilt es für das vorliegende Buch, dessen Entstehung sich unter ganz besonderen Umständen vollzog.
  • The “Court Cases” of General Ye. F. Kern Kretinin, Gennady V

    The “Court Cases” of General Ye. F. Kern Kretinin, Gennady V

    www.ssoar.info The “court cases” of General Ye. F. Kern Kretinin, Gennady V. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Kretinin, G. V. (2012). The “court cases” of General Ye. F. Kern. Baltic Region, 2, 53-61. https:// doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2012-2-6 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-326632 G. V. Kretinin This article focuses on the battle ca- THE “COURT CASES” reer of the Russian general, Ye. F. Kern, OF GENERAL who dedicated sixty years to the service of the country. General Kern participated in YE. F. KERN most wars and military campaigns the Russian state was involved in in the last quarter of the 18th-the first quarter of the * th G. V. Kretinin 19 centuries. Despite being a contempo- rary and often a companion-in-arms to outstanding Russian public and military officers, he could not secure a dominant position on the military Areopagus. More- over, in the post-war period his life was scarred by tragedies. In the Russian culture, he became notorious because of his wife.
  • BORIS GODUNOV Modest Mussorgsky Prologue: at the Instigation of the Boyars, Headed by Shuisky, Russian Peasants Are Forced by P

    BORIS GODUNOV Modest Mussorgsky Prologue: at the Instigation of the Boyars, Headed by Shuisky, Russian Peasants Are Forced by P

    BORIS GODUNOV Modest Mussorgsky Prologue: At the instigation of the Boyars, headed by Shuisky, Russian peasants are forced by police into demonstrating for Boris Godunov's ascension to the vacant throne of Russia. Shchelkalov, Secretary of the Duma (Council of Boyars), appears at the monastery doorway to announce that Boris still refuses and that Russia is doomed. A procession of pilgrims passes, praying to God for help. Amidst cheering crowds, the great bells of Moscow herald the coronation of Boris. As the procession leaves the cathedral, Boris appears in triumph. Haunted by a strange foreboding, he prays for God's blessing. Addressing his people, he invites them all to the feast, as the crowd resumes rejoicing. ACT I: The old monk Pimen is finishing a history of Russia. Young Grigory, a novice, awakes and describes to Pimen his nightmare in which he climbed a lofty tower and viewed the swarming multitude of Muscovites below who mocked him until he stumbled and fell. Pimen tells Grigory that fasting and prayer bring peace of mind, and compares the quiet solitude of the cloister to the outside world of sin and idle pleasure. Grigory questions Pimen about the dead Tsarevich Dimitri, legal heir to the Russian throne; Pimen recounts how Boris ordered the boy's murder. Left alone, Grigory condemns Boris and his crime and decides to leave the cloister. Three guests interrupt the innkeeper's ballad: two drunken monks-Varlaam and Missail-and the disguised Grigory, who is being pursued by the police for escaping from the monastery. Now considering it his mission to expose Boris, Grigory is attempting flight to Lithuania, where he will assemble forces and, proclaiming himself the Tsarevich Dimitri, claim the Russian throne.