DOCSLIB.ORG

Study of Mnemiopsis Leidyi Diet and Reproduction in the Southern Coasts of Caspian Sea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study of Mnemiopsis Leidyi Diet and Reproduction in the Southern Coasts of Caspian Sea Study of Mnemiopsis leidyi diet and reproduction in the southern coasts of Caspian Sea Item Type Report Authors Bagheri, Siamak; Mirzajani, A.; Sabkara, J.; Kiabi, B.; Makaremi, M.; Roohi, A.; Khodaparast, H.; Shuomali, M.; Ghasemi, S.; Parafkande, F. Publisher Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute Download date 07/10/2021 19:38:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/13061 MINISTRY OF JIHAD - E - AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION ORGANIZATION IRANIAN FISHERIES RESEARCH ORGANIZATION- INLAND WATERS AQUACUTURE RESEARCH CENTER Study of Mnemiopsis leidyi diet and reproduction in the southern coasts of Caspian Sea Executor : Siamak Bagheri 85.521 Ministry of Jihad e Agriculture Agriculture Research and Education Organization IRANIAN FISHERIES RESEARCH ORGANIZATION INLAND WATERS AQUACULTURE RESEARCH CENTER Title : Study of Mnemiopsis leidyi diet and reproduction in the southern coasts of Caspian Sea Approved Number :80-0710340000-09 Author: Siamak Bagheri Executor : Siamak Bagheri Collaborator : A. Mirzajani- J. Sabkara- B. kiabi- M. Makaremi- A. Roohi-H. Khodaparast- M. Shuomali. S- Ghasemi- F. Parafkande Advisor : B. Kiabi Location of execution : Guilan Date of Beginning : 2003 Period of execution : 1 years and 6 months Publisher : Iranian Fisheries Research Organization Circulation : 15 Date of publishing : 2007 All Right Reserved . No Part of this Publication May be Reproduced or Transmitted without indicating the Original Reference Lobata Ctenophora Mnemiopsis leidyi M.leidyi . M.leidyi M.leidyi METU net ± M.leidyi . ± Copepoda Acartia Cladocera Podon polyphemoides Lamllibranchia Acartia Copepoda M.leidyi Mnemiopsis leidyi Lobata Ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi Mnemiopsis (Agassiz, 1965 Mnemiopsis leidyi (A.Agassiz,1965) Miller Harbison et al., 1978 Mnemiopsis Simmons, 1975 Burrel & Van Engel., M.leidyi 1976 M.leidyi M.leidyi Pereladov, 1988 350 100 150 200 250 300 50 0 Dumont 1968 Coelenterata Ivanov 1970 Kideys 1972 Dumont , 1974 1994 1976 Y 1978 e a r s 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 Ctenophora M 1990 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 . M leidyi n e ( m GESAMP Mnemiopsis wet weight (g/m2) i o p s i s l e , i d 1997 y i M.leidyi Shiganova, 2002 Mnemiopsis M.leidyi Romanova Finenko Revkov Zaika Mutlu Purcell M.leidyi . Shiganova, 2002) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 (Shiganova, 2002 tee no fo rah Ctenophore Ctenophore Gilbert and Raonio, 1997) Beroidae Colloblast Pechenik, 2000) Macrocilia Mesoglea Triploblastic Pechenik, 2000 Pleurobrachia pileus Leucothea Cestus veneris (Macginitie & Macginitie, 1968 (Macginitie & Macginitie, 1968 Macginitie & Macginitie, 1968 Martindale & Henry, 1997 Zaika & Revkov, 1994 Centrolecithal Vitelline membrane Syncytium Martindale & Henry, 1997 Zaika & Revkov, 1994 (Martindale & Henry, 1997 Sinus Martindale & Henry, 1997 Martindale & Henry, 1997 Mnemiopsis Beroe Aster Martindale & Henry, 1997 Syngamy Mnemiopsis leidyi Beroe cucumis Bolinopsis Zaika & Revkov, 1994 Beroe ovata Arashkevich et al., 2001 Barnes, 1968 Cydippid Martindale & Henry, 1997 Mnemiopsis leidyi Dissogeny . Paedogenesis Cydippida Lobata Martindale & Henry, 1997 Shiganova, 2002 Martindale & Henry, 1997 . (Macginitie & Macginitie, 1968) Martindale & Henry, 1997 METU net M.leidyi METU net Bagheri & Kideys, 2002 R2=0.96 W= 0.0013*L2.33 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 0 10 20 30 40 Bagheri & Kideys, 2002 M.leidyi . ± Kideys et al., 2001 M.leidyi M.leidyi Judy net . Rutner Bogavrov Stample Newell, 1977 (Newell,1977.; Vollenweider,1974 ; Clesceri et al., 1989) Excel ± 4500 y = 677,01x1,3672 4000 R2 = 0,6822 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 ± 2 350 y = 0,1325x - 2,5418x + 23,954 R2 = 0,6002 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 3000 y = 1265,5x2,6382 R2 = 0,7329 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 ± M.leidyi 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 4 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 A.Kideys M.leidyi Cydippida M.leidyi 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 M .leidyi Copepoda Ciliata Cladocera M Ac .leidyi artia M .leidyi Ponon Cirripedia Acartia polyphemoides 40 Rotatoria 35 M 30 .leidyi Balanus 25 20 15 10 5 0 Rotatoria Lamllibranchia Ciliata Acartia Cirripedia Cladocera Brachionus Copepod egg M Copepoda .leidyi Digest zoo Fish egg Hydrozoa Lamllibranchia Rotatoria Rotatoria egg Thalasionema Chrysophyta Phacus Euglenaphyta Osillatoria Cyanophyta Senedesmus Chlorophyta Prorocentrum Pyrrophyta 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Chrysophyta Cyanophyta Euglenophyta Pyrrophyta chlorophyta M.leidyi M.leidyi 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 Lamllibranchia .leidyi M Daigest zoo Copepoda egg Rotifer egg Fish egg Rotatoria Rotatoria 7 6 Cirripedia 5 Lamllibranchia 4 Hydrozoa 3 Cladocera 2 Ciliata 1 Copepoda 0 Protozoa aminifera For ± a Copepod ± ± Rotatoria Acartia & Copepoda egg Copepoda nauplii Acartia Zoo digest Balanus nauplii Rotatoria Porotozoa Polychaeta Lamllibranchia Foraminifera 8000 Fish larvae 7000 Fish egg 6000 Cladocera 5000 Copepoda 4000 Cladocera 3000 Cirripedia Acartia 2000 , 0 Rotatoria 1000 a d o ep p o Halicyclops C Cladocera Cyanophyta Podon polyphemoides Chlorophyta Copepoda Pyrrophyta 900000 800000 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 Chryso Cyano Eugleno pyrro Chloro Shiganova Mnemiopsis Dumont Harbison Kremer, 1994 Ctenophora ± M.leidyi Shiganova et al., 1997 M.leidyi Baker and Reeve, 1974 Arashkevich Shiganova et al., 2001 Revkov Zaika Beroe Arashkevich et al., 2001 Finenko Romanova Arashkevich Mnemiopsis leidyi Zaika & Revkov, 1994 Romanova Finenko 2000 ; Kremer,1994 Kideys M.leidyi Arashkevich Zaika & Revkov, 1994 Shiganova ± Mnemiopsis Acartia Acartia Revkov Zaika M. leidyi Mnemiopsis Smayda Deason Mnemiopsis Thalasionema Chrysophyta Dumont Harbison Prorocentrum Pyrrophyta Acartia Acartia M.leidyi Rotatoria Podon polyphemoides Lamllibranchia Ciliata Balanus Acartia Rotatoria M.leidyi Mutlu Copepoda Copepoda ,Mollusca ,Cladocera ,Rotatoria Sergeeva M.leidyi Copepoda M. leidyi Purcell et al , 2001 Ciliata, Cirripedia, Copepoda Nelson,1925; Burrel &Van Engel, 1976; Larson,1987 Mnemiopsis Purcell Kremer, 1994 ± Copepoda Foraminifera Dumont Harbison Copepoda Podon polyphemoides Cladocera Halicyclops ,Acartia Copepoda Cladocera Copepoda Moina , Calanipeda , Cyclops Antoaneta et al., 2002) Mnemiopsis M. leidyi Purcell et al., 2001 ) Paracalanus parvus Ostrovskaya et al ., 1998) Centropages ponticus M.leidyi M.leidyi M.leidyi Narragansett M.leidyi Vinogradov Deason & Smayda, 1982 M.leidyi Purcell Shiganova et al., 2001 M. leidyi Shiganova et al., 1997 M. leidyi Cyanophyta Pyrrophyta Chrysophyta Pyrrophyta Kideys & Romanova, 2001) (Deason & Smayda, 1982) Kideys Kideys Huso huso Copepoda Acartia Acartia M.leidyi .(Bagheri & Kideys, 2002) Acartia CEP CEP Mnemiopsis leidyi Mnemiopsis leidyi . Mnemiopsis leidyi Mnemiopsis leidyi Agassiz A., 1965. North American Acalephae. Illustrated catalog of the Museum of Compar. Zool.Vol. 2. pp.1-234. Antoaneta, T.; Kremena, S.; Trayan.; T. and Ulrich, N., 2002. Zooplankton and macrozoobenthic communities of the Varna Beloslav Lakes System 1906-2001. How economy and industry affected the ecology? A case study. 1045 P. Arashkevich E. G.; Anokhina, L. L.; Vostokov, . S. V.; Dritz, A. V.; Lukasheva, T. A.; Luppova N. E.; Musaeva, E. I.and Tolomeev A. N., 2001. Reproductive Strategy of Beroe ovata (Ctenophora, Atentaculata, Beroida)-A New Invader in the Black Sea. Marine biology, Vol. 41. No. 1, pp. 111- 115. Bagheri, S. and Kideys, A. E., 2002. Distribution and abundance of Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Caspian Sea. Oceanography of the Eastern Mediterranean and Black Sea. METU Cultural and Convetion Center Ankara/ TURKEY. 342 P. Baker, L. D. and Reeve, M. R., 1974. Laboratoy culture of lobate Ctenophora Mnemiopsis with notes on feeding and fecundity. Marine Biol. Vol. 31. pp. 61-74. Barnes R., 1968. Invertebrates zoology. W.B. Sanuders company. 743 P. Burrel ,V. G. and Van Engel W.A., 1976. Predation by and distribution of a Ctenophora Mnemiopsis leidyi (A.Agassiz), in the York estuary. Estuarine Coast. Mar.Sci, Vol. 4. pp. 235-242. Clesceri, L. S.; Greenberg, A. F. and Trussell, R. R., 1989. Standard method, American Public Health Association,Washington, U.S.A. 548 P Deason, E. E and Smayda, T.J., 1982. Experimental evaluation of herbivory in the Ctenophora Mnemiopsis leidyi relevant to Ctenophora-zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island USA.j. plankton Res.Vol. 4. pp. 219-221. Dumont, H. J., 1995. Ecocide in the Caspian Sea. Marine Biology, Vol. 25. pp. 673-674. Finenko, G. A. and Romanova, Z. A., 2000. Population Dynamics and Energetic of the Ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi in Sevastopol Bay. Marin Biol. Vol. 40. pp. 677-685. GESAMP(IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP) Join Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection,. 1997. Opportunistic settlers and the problem of the Ctenophora Mnemiopsis leidyi invasion in the Black Sea. Rep Stud. Vol. 58. pp. 34-87. Gilbert, S. F. and Raonio, A. M., 1997. Embryology: Constructing the organism, Sinauer Associates. pp. 87-111. Harbison, G. R.; Madin L. P. and Swanberg, N. R., 1978. On the natural history and distribution of oceanic Ctenophoras. Deep- Sea Research. Vol. 25. pp. 233-256. Harbison, R. and Dumont, H.J., 2000. Invasion of the Caspian Sea by Comb Jellyfish Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora). Oceanography. pp.12-23. Ivanov, P. I.; Kamakima, A. M.; Ushivtzev, V.B.; Shiganova, T.A.; Zhukova, O.; Aladin. N.;Wilson, S. I.; Harbison, G. R.and Domunt, H. J., 2000. Invasion of Caspian Sea by the come jelly fish Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora), Biological Invasion. Vol. 2. pp. 255-258. Kideys, A. E., 1994. Recent dramatic changes in the Black Sea ecosystem: the reason for the sharp decline in Turkish Anchoy fisheries. J Mar Syst. Vol. 5. pp. 171-181. Kideys, E. A.; Ghasemi, S.; Ghaninejad, D.; Roohi, A. and Bagheri, S. 2000. Strategy for combating Mnemiopsis in the Caspian Waters of Iran.CEP, Final Report .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Author's Personal Copy
    Author's personal copy 554 Book reviews Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology – The Legacy of Charles The 30 chapters are well written, and David Richardson Elton. D.M. Richardson (ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford did an excellent job in editing the diverse contributions of 51 (2011). 432 pp., £45 (paperback), £95 (hardcover), authors, most of them from North America, South Africa, and ISBN: 978-1-4443-3586-6 (paperback), 978-1-4443-3585- Australia. Asia and South America are not represented by any 9 (hardcover) contribution, and European researchers are underrepresented. Most chapters are relatively short, with an easily accessible This book is intended for all scientists and students inter- essay style. This comes at the expense of presentation of ested in biological invasions. It is based on a conference held original data, mirrored by rather few tables and figures. On in South Africa in 2008 to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the other hand, we applaud the possibility to download illus- the famous volume by Charles S. Elton on ‘The Ecology of trations from a companion website. The book is technically Invasions by Animals and Plants’. When a scientific disci- well done; virtually no typos could be spotted, and the over- pline starts exploring its history, defines terms and reviews lap among individual chapters is minimal. The terminology, achievements, this can be a sign of maturity, yet invasion for example on ‘alien’ and ‘non-indigenous’ species (chap- ecology continues to develop in a positive and dynamic way. ters 1 and 4), is not fully consistent, but this should not be The research dynamics in this field are enormous, building on taken too seriously.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkcam Fishes
    SharkCam Fishes A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower By Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie 1 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index Trevor Mendelow, designer of SharkCam, on August 31, 2014, the day of the original SharkCam installation. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition by Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For questions related to this guide or its usage contact Erin Burge. The suggested citation for this guide is: Burge EJ, CE O’Brien and jon-newbie. 2020. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition. Los Angeles: Explore.org Ocean Frontiers. 201 pp. Available online http://explore.org/live-cams/player/shark-cam. Guide version 5.0. 24 February 2020. 2 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index TABLE OF CONTENTS SILVERY FISHES (23) ........................... 47 African Pompano ......................................... 48 FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION .............. 6 Crevalle Jack ................................................. 49 IDENTIFICATION IMAGES ...................... 10 Permit .......................................................... 50 Sharks and Rays ........................................ 10 Almaco Jack ................................................. 51 Illustrations of SharkCam
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Predation Impact of the Introduced Ctenophore Mnemiopsis Leidyi in the Gullmars Fjord, West Coast of Sweden
    POPULATION DYNAMICS AND PREDATION IMPACT OF THE INTRODUCED CTENOPHORE MNEMIOPSIS LEIDYI IN THE GULLMARS FJORD, WEST COAST OF SWEDEN Lene Friis Møller & Peter Tiselius Dep. Of Marine Ecology – Kristineberg University of Gothenburg The Gullmar Fjord Always stratified Well-documented Rich and diverse fauna Kristineberg Also many jellies Cnidarians Aurelia aurita Cyanea capillata Many hydromedusae Ctenophores Pleurobrachia pileus Bolinopsis infundibulum Beroe cucumis Beroe gracilis What is dominating has now changed.... Mnemiopsis leidyi - invasive ctenophore Native species along the Eats zooplankton American East Coast (and fish eggs) Invaded northern Europe in 2005/2006 High reproduction Most famous for its invasion into the Black Sea in the 80´s Given the rapid growth and high reproductive output of the Mnemiopsis, severe effects on its prey populations may be expected It is impossible to predict the outcome of the introduction into Swedish waters based on observations from other areas – both potential prey and predators differ It is therefore necessary to investigate the development and impact of Mnemiopsis locally Mnemiopsis studies in the Gullmar Fjord In the current project we study the development of the Mnemiopsis population in the Gullmar fjord by regular sampling from March 2007 to present (for long periods every week) (+ zooplankton, chl a, primary production, CTD) x Biomass (g wet weight m-3) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 17‐Jun‐07 6‐Aug‐07 25‐Sep‐07 2009 2008 2007 14‐Nov‐07 3‐Jan‐08 22‐Feb‐08 Mnemiopsis biomass 12‐Apr‐08 2007-2009 1‐Jun‐08 21‐Jul‐08 9‐Sep‐08 29‐Oct‐08 18‐Dec‐08 6‐Feb‐09 28‐Mar‐09 17‐May‐09 6‐Jul‐09 25‐Aug‐09 14‐Oct‐09 3‐Dec‐09 22‐Jan‐10 Development Oral/aboral Rapoza et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Jellyfish Populations: Trends in Large Marine Ecosystems
    CHANGING JELLYFISH POPULATIONS: TRENDS IN LARGE MARINE ECOSYSTEMS by Lucas Brotz B.Sc., The University of British Columbia, 2000 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Oceanography) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2011 © Lucas Brotz, 2011 Abstract Although there are various indications and claims that jellyfish have been increasing at a global scale in recent decades, a rigorous demonstration to this effect has never been presented. As this is mainly due to scarcity of quantitative time series of jellyfish abundance from scientific surveys, an attempt is presented here to complement such data with non- conventional information from other sources. This was accomplished using the analytical framework of fuzzy logic, which allows the combination of information with variable degrees of cardinality, reliability, and temporal and spatial coverage. Data were aggregated and analysed at the scale of Large Marine Ecosystem (LME). Of the 66 LMEs defined thus far, which cover the world’s coastal waters and seas, trends of jellyfish abundance (increasing, decreasing, or stable/variable) were identified (occurring after 1950) for 45, with variable degrees of confidence. Of these 45 LMEs, the overwhelming majority (31 or 69%) showed increasing trends. Recent evidence also suggests that the observed increases in jellyfish populations may be due to the effects of human activities, such as overfishing, global warming, pollution, and coastal development. Changing jellyfish populations were tested for links with anthropogenic impacts at the LME scale, using a variety of indicators and a generalized additive model. Significant correlations were found with several indicators of ecosystem health, as well as marine aquaculture production, suggesting that the observed increases in jellyfish populations are indeed due to human activities and the continued degradation of the marine environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles and Plankton
    Ocean Sci., 15, 1327–1340, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1327-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The Pelagic In situ Observation System (PELAGIOS) to reveal biodiversity, behavior, and ecology of elusive oceanic fauna Henk-Jan Hoving1, Svenja Christiansen2, Eduard Fabrizius1, Helena Hauss1, Rainer Kiko1, Peter Linke1, Philipp Neitzel1, Uwe Piatkowski1, and Arne Körtzinger1,3 1GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany 2University of Oslo, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway 3Christian Albrecht University Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, 24118 Kiel, Germany Correspondence: Henk-Jan Hoving ([email protected]) Received: 16 November 2018 – Discussion started: 10 December 2018 Revised: 11 June 2019 – Accepted: 17 June 2019 – Published: 7 October 2019 Abstract. There is a need for cost-efficient tools to explore 1 Introduction deep-ocean ecosystems to collect baseline biological obser- vations on pelagic fauna (zooplankton and nekton) and es- The open-ocean pelagic zones include the largest, yet least tablish the vertical ecological zonation in the deep sea. The explored habitats on the planet (Robison, 2004; Webb et Pelagic In situ Observation System (PELAGIOS) is a 3000 m al., 2010; Ramirez-Llodra et al., 2010). Since the first rated slowly (0.5 m s−1) towed camera system with LED il- oceanographic expeditions, oceanic communities of macro- lumination, an integrated oceanographic sensor set (CTD- zooplankton and micronekton have been sampled using nets O2) and telemetry allowing for online data acquisition and (Wiebe and Benfield, 2003). Such sampling has revealed a video inspection (low definition).
    [Show full text]
  • First Report on Beroe Ovata in an Unusual Mixture of Ctenophores in the Great Belt (Denmark)
    First report on Beroe ovata in an unusual mixture of ctenophores in the Great Belt (Denmark) Shiganova, Tamara A.; Riisgard, Hans Ulrik; Ghabooli, Sara; Tendal, Ole Secher Published in: Aquatic Invasions DOI: 10.3391/ai.2014.9.1.10 Publication date: 2014 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: Unspecified Citation for published version (APA): Shiganova, T. A., Riisgard, H. U., Ghabooli, S., & Tendal, O. S. (2014). First report on Beroe ovata in an unusual mixture of ctenophores in the Great Belt (Denmark). Aquatic Invasions, 9(1), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2014.9.1.10 Download date: 27. sep.. 2021 Aquatic Invasions (2014) Volume 9, Issue 1: 111–116 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2014.9.1.10 Open Access © 2014 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2014 REABIC Research Article First report on Beroe ovata in an unusual mixture of ctenophores in the Great Belt (Denmark) Tamara A. Shiganova1*, Hans Ulrik Riisgård2, Sara Ghabooli3 and Ole Secher Tendal4 1P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia 2Marine Biological Research Centre (University of Southern Denmark), Hindsholmvej 11, DK-5300 Kerteminde, Denmark 3Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Canada 4Zoological Museum, SNM, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark E-mail: [email protected] (TAS), [email protected] (HUR), [email protected] (SG), [email protected] (OST) *Corresponding author Received: 16 September 2013 / Accepted: 23 January 2014 / Published online: 3 February 2014 Handling editor: Maiju Lehtiniemi Abstract Between mid-December 2011 and mid-January 2012 an unusual mixture of ctenophores was observed and collected at Kerteminde harbor (Great Belt, Denmark).
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Beroe Ovata Mayer, 1912 (Ctenophora: Beroida: Beroidae) Off the Mediterranean Coast of Israel
    Aquatic Invasions (2011) Volume 6, Supplement 1: S89–S90 doi: 10.3391/ai.2011.6.S1.020 Open Access © 2011 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2011 REABIC Aquatic Invasions Records Not far behind: First record of Beroe ovata Mayer, 1912 (Ctenophora: Beroida: Beroidae) off the Mediterranean coast of Israel Bella S. Galil1*, Roy Gevili2 and Tamara Shiganova3 1National Institute of Oceanography, Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, POB 8030, Haifa 31080, Israel 2Rogozin 54/25, Ashdod 77440, Israel 3P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS, Nakhimovsky av. 36, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation E-mail: [email protected] (BSG), [email protected] (RG), [email protected] (TS) *Corresponding author Received: 15 July 2011 / Accepted: 19 July 2011 / Published online: 22 July 2011 Abstract The American brown comb jelly, Beroe ovata, was first noted off the Mediterranean coast of Israel on 10 June 2011, outside the port of Ashdod. The occurrence of B. ovata soon after its prey, Mnemiopsis leidyi, had been recorded follows the pattern of spread elsewhere, yet its presence in the warm and saline waters of the SE Levant is a surprise. Key words: Beroe ovata, Ctenophora, invasive species, Mediterranean, Israel Introduction identical to photographs of B. ovata specimens from the Black Sea, Aegean and Adriatic (Figure Beroe ovata Mayer, 1912 is indigenous to 4 in Shiganova et al. 2007; Figure 3G in western Atlantic coastal waters, from the USA to Shiganova and Malej 2009). Argentina, (Mayer 1912; Mianzan 1999). The The occurrence of B. ovata in the Evvoikos first occurrence in the Mediterranean was noted Gulf was attributed to the outflow of the Black in November 2004, from the northern Evvoikos Sea water masses via the Bosphorus strait, the Gulf, Greece (Shiganova et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition of the Free Living Multicellular Invertebrate Animals
    Historia naturalis bulgarica, 21: 49-168, 2015 Species composition of the free living multicellular invertebrate animals (Metazoa: Invertebrata) from the Bulgarian sector of the Black Sea and the coastal brackish basins Zdravko Hubenov Abstract: A total of 19 types, 39 classes, 123 orders, 470 families and 1537 species are known from the Bulgarian Black Sea. They include 1054 species (68.6%) of marine and marine-brackish forms and 508 species (33.0%) of freshwater-brackish, freshwater and terrestrial forms, connected with water. Five types (Nematoda, Rotifera, Annelida, Arthropoda and Mollusca) have a high species richness (over 100 species). Of these, the richest in species are Arthropoda (802 species – 52.2%), Annelida (173 species – 11.2%) and Mollusca (152 species – 9.9%). The remaining 14 types include from 1 to 38 species. There are some well-studied regions (over 200 species recorded): first, the vicinity of Varna (601 spe- cies), where investigations continue for more than 100 years. The aquatory of the towns Nesebar, Pomorie, Burgas and Sozopol (220 to 274 species) and the region of Cape Kaliakra (230 species) are well-studied. Of the coastal basins most studied are the lakes Durankulak, Ezerets-Shabla, Beloslav, Varna, Pomorie, Atanasovsko, Burgas, Mandra and the firth of Ropotamo River (up to 100 species known). The vertical distribution has been analyzed for 800 species (75.9%) – marine and marine-brackish forms. The great number of species is found from 0 to 25 m on sand (396 species) and rocky (257 species) bottom. The groups of stenohypo- (52 species – 6.5%), stenoepi- (465 species – 58.1%), meso- (115 species – 14.4%) and eurybathic forms (168 species – 21.0%) are represented.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Literaturliste Zu Porifera Und Coelenterarta
    LITERATUR PORIFERA (SCHWÄMME) ARTIKEL ZU PORIFERA (SCHWÄMME ) VAN SOEST, R.W.M. (1976): First European record of Haliclona loosanoffi Hartman, 1958 (Porifera, Haplosclerida), a species hithero known only from the New England coast (U.S.A.). Beaufortia 24: 177-187 VAN SOEST, R.W.M. (1977): Marine and freshwater sponges (Porifera) of the Netherlands. Zool Meded 50: 261-273 VAN SOEST, R.W.M., KLUIJVER, M.J. DE, BRAGT, P.H. VAN, FAASSE, M., NIJLAND, R., BEGLINGER, E.J., WEERDT, W.H. DE & VOOGD, N.J. DE (2007): Sponge invaders in Dutch coastal waters. J Mar Biol Ass U.K. 87: 1733-1748 COELENTERATA (HOHLTIERE) ARTIKEL ZU CTENOPHORA (RIPPENQUALLEN ) ANTAJAN, E., BASTIAN, T., RAUD, T., BRYLINSKI, J.-M., HOFFMANN, S., BRETON, G., CORNILLE, V., DELEGRANGE, A. & VINCENT, D. (2014): The invasive ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz, 1865 along the English Channel and the North Sea French coasts: another introduction pathway in northern European waters? Aquatic Invasions 9: 167- 173 BILIO, M. & NIERMANN, U. (2004): Is the comb jelly really to blame for it all? Mnemiopsis leidyi and the ecological concerns about the Caspian Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 269: 173-183 BOERSMA, M., MALZAHN, A.M., GREVE, W. & JAVIDPOUR, J. (2007): The first occurrence of the ctenophore Mneniopsis leidyi in the North Sea. Helgol Mar Res 61: 153-155 DIDŽIULIS, V. (2013): NOBANIS – Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet – Mnemiopsis leidyi. From: Online Database of the North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species – NOBANIS www.nobanis.org (10.07.2013) FAASSE, M. & BAYHA, K.M. (2006): The ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi A.
    [Show full text]
  • Images Included in This Publication Are Sourced from Public Domain
    Invasive Alien Species of India S. Sandilyan Authors S. Sandilyan Citation Sandilyan, S, Meenakumari, B, Babu, C.R,and Mandal, R.2019.Invasive Alien Species ofIndia. National Biodiversity Authority, Chennai. Corresponding Authors B. Meenakumari, C.R.Babu,and R. Mandal Copyright © National Biodiversity Authority 2018 Published by Centre for Biodiversity Policy and Law (CEBPOL) National Biodiversity Authority 5th Floor, TICEL Biopark, CSIR Road, Taramani Chennai – 600 113, Tamil Nadu, India Website: http://nbaindia.org/cebpol/ Layout and Design: N. Singaram IT Executive, CEBPOL Disclaimer: This publications is prepared as an initiative under CEBPOL programme. All the views expressed in this publication are based on established legal principles. Any error or lapse is purely unintended and inconsequential and shall not make either the NBA or the CEBPOL liable for the same. Some pictures and images included in this publication are sourced from public domain. This publications is purely for non- commercial purposes including awareness creation and capacity building. Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Criteria adopted for designating an alien species as invasive ....................................................... 3 3. Terrestrial Invasive Alien Plant Species ......................................................................................... 8 4. Aquatic Invasive Alien Plant Species ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Diver Course
    Conservation Diver Course Conservation Diver Course 1 Inhoud 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Taxonomy ........................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 What is taxonomy? .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 A brief history of taxonomy ............................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Scientific names ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.5 The hierarchical system of classification ....................................................................................... 12 2.5.1 Species ................................................................................................................................... 13 2.5.2 Genus ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2.5.3 Family .................................................................................................................................... 14 2.5.4 Order ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CTENOPHORA Comb Jellies
    THREE Phylum CTENOPHORA comb jellies HERMES MIANZAN, ELLIOT W. Dawson, CLAUDIA E. MILLS tenophores have been described as the most beautiful, delicate, seem- ingly innocent yet most voracious, sinister and destructive of plankton Corganisms. They are exclusively marine, are found in all oceans at all depths, have many different shapes, and range in size from a few millimetres diameter to two metres long. They are mostly planktonic, but one order is bottom- dwelling with a creeping mode of existence. The planktonic forms are stunningly beautiful, diaphanous creatures, flashing iridescence as their comb-like cilia plates catch the light. Their bodies are soft, fragile, gelatinous. The phylum is small and well defined, with about 150 species worldwide (Mills 2008). Like the Cnidaria, they are radiate animals and at one time the two phyla were linked together as the Coelenterata. Ctenophoran symmetry is biradial and the general body plan somewhat more complicated than that of Cnidaria (Harbison & Madin 1982; Mills & Miller 1984; Harbison 1985). The two phyla are now thought to be only very distantly related. Recent evidence from ribosomal RNA sequencing shows that the Ctenophora lie close to the Porifera as the second-most-basic group of the Metazoa (Bridge et al. 1995; Collins 1998; Podar et al. 2001). Similarity in body form between pelagic ctenophores and medusae is a phenomenon of convergence. Ctenophores (literally, comb bearers) are named for their eight symmetrical tracks (comb rows) of fused ciliary plates (ctenes) on the body surface (Hernán- dez-Nicaise & Franc 1993). These constitute the locomotory apparatus that Leucothea sp. characterises the group.
    [Show full text]